R6 Is meant to capture the chaos of battle, usally after the fight the end result of the bomb zone looks like there was a gun fight, all CS2 shows is the bodies. Also he shot a destructible wall as a "door"
Really good point. In CS2, the aftermath of a battle feels like a killing simulator in a flat map, however, in R6 the map is affected in a way tracks and visual proof is left of how the battle resulted, giving the overall shootout more weight and value. Also, siege doesn't even have one single functional door (maybe some background props) and barricades is the closest but simulate sheer planks, not wood. I think showing actual wood made his example more clear in comparison to the CS2 door
I love the lighting in cs2, everything looks and feels like a real place, nothing feels like it's just floating there in a game engine, and the image feels cohesive.
you cant compare both games bruh , R6 definitely has better breakable physics cause the whole game is design to be breakable. the recoil is also weird to compare since one gets accurate with hipfire the other gets accurate through ads.
@@diceslayer1 I have 10 thousand hours of cs and 5 thousand hours of r6. and I'll tell you, for some reason the R6 has mibile graphics. This game already had better graphics. CS2, which is a current version of CSGO, even with the same maps just ported, presents more current graphics than R6. Look at the CS2 smoke and compare it to the R6 smoke. Look at the water in the CS2 and compare it with the water in the R6. I stopped playing r6 for a few months and when I started playing again, I was scared by the poor graphics. I don't know what ubsoft did with this game. As for CS2, whenever I'm playing, I never tire of being enchanted by the reflection of the lights on the weapons, by the physics of the smoke, by the lighting in some points on the maps, by the shadows of your character projected on the walls. But for you to realize the beauty of CS2's graphics you have to play at least in 1080p, most play in 720p. cs2, being a version of csgo, shouldn't be more beautiful than r6, but for some reason it is. When you enter r6 nowadays you realize you are in an old game. And I always thought this game was beautiful.
But maps were he displayed "graphics quality" were from 2012 aka office, that map hasn't changed, it even has got downdrades in some ways, for example till i think 2017 windows were shootable and bullets left holes were windows were shot and rest of window just shattered and stayed till player walked through or nade exploded it or if player made bigger holes with bullets. And the small objects were more destructible, but in cs2 they really went for compettetive game type and removed a buch of stuff
I have 10 thousand hours of cs and 5 thousand hours of r6. and I'll tell you, for some reason the R6 has mibile graphics. This game already had better graphics. CS2, which is a current version of CSGO, even with the same maps just ported, presents more current graphics than R6. Look at the CS2 smoke and compare it to the R6 smoke. Look at the water in the CS2 and compare it with the water in the R6. I stopped playing r6 for a few months and when I started playing again, I was scared by the poor graphics. I don't know what ubsoft did with this game. As for CS2, whenever I'm playing, I never tire of being enchanted by the reflection of the lights on the weapons, by the physics of the smoke, by the lighting in some points on the maps, by the shadows of your character projected on the walls. But for you to realize the beauty of CS2's graphics you have to play at least in 1080p, most play in 720p. cs2, being a version of csgo, shouldn't be more beautiful than r6, but for some reason it is. When you enter r6 nowadays you realize you are in an old game. And I always thought this game was beautiful.
R6 water isn’t made well because in the maps of the game u can’t find any type of water beside of the background water u can find in the map Kanal or Yatch which has no functionality in terms of gameplay
remeber that cs2 is competitive game that is optimised in a way to run on almost all type of computers, the things that are done in rainbow six are also possible in cs, but the maps are made in a way so you can have a good and playable competitive expirience without needing a beefy pc
Bro forgot that siege is about tactics and the ability to create holes in walls for better views and that the recoil is kinda more realistic than the cs 2. My guy, counter strike might be the og of competitive team tactical shooter but siege is just the upgrade. I love both tho... more so because i played counter strike 1.6 when it came out😂.
Coming from an Environment Artist, R6 is one of the best games out there for it's graphics to performance ratio. The Environments are still holding up to our standards today and has really wwll lighting despite running ridiculously good on even lower end machines. CS definitely went in more what we can call semi stylized look. And the video certainly misses out on things R6 is made for.
CS2 is a game developed with Source 2 architecture. R6 is a game released in 2015. It would be more accurate to compare r6 and csgo. It was better than CS:GO, but now it is an old and 10 year old game.
Hey there! I appreciate you being the first to comment! Not much, just working on more content for you all. How about you? What's up on your end, bro? 😄
Bro forgot that you can aim down sights in r6 siege 💀
you can ads in CS, but with most guns you can't
bro thats just false
@@thewiseone2717that sucks
why do I think that this dude never actually played R6
cause he def hasnt
R6 Is meant to capture the chaos of battle, usally after the fight the end result of the bomb zone looks like there was a gun fight, all CS2 shows is the bodies.
Also he shot a destructible wall as a "door"
Really good point. In CS2, the aftermath of a battle feels like a killing simulator in a flat map, however, in R6 the map is affected in a way tracks and visual proof is left of how the battle resulted, giving the overall shootout more weight and value.
Also, siege doesn't even have one single functional door (maybe some background props) and barricades is the closest but simulate sheer planks, not wood. I think showing actual wood made his example more clear in comparison to the CS2 door
I love the lighting in cs2, everything looks and feels like a real place, nothing feels like it's just floating there in a game engine, and the image feels cohesive.
you cant compare both games bruh , R6 definitely has better breakable physics cause the whole game is design to be breakable. the recoil is also weird to compare since one gets accurate with hipfire the other gets accurate through ads.
You can compare, the only thing that r6s done better is its physics in breaking objects and the rest goes to cs2
They used an old version of R6@@yoimiya_ei
@@yoimiya_ei Lmfaoo don’t kid ur self, comparing r6 to cs2 is like comparing calculus to counting.
@@diceslayer1 I have 10 thousand hours of cs and 5 thousand hours of r6. and I'll tell you, for some reason the R6 has mibile graphics. This game already had better graphics.
CS2, which is a current version of CSGO, even with the same maps just ported, presents more current graphics than R6.
Look at the CS2 smoke and compare it to the R6 smoke. Look at the water in the CS2 and compare it with the water in the R6.
I stopped playing r6 for a few months and when I started playing again, I was scared by the poor graphics. I don't know what ubsoft did with this game.
As for CS2, whenever I'm playing, I never tire of being enchanted by the reflection of the lights on the weapons, by the physics of the smoke, by the lighting in some points on the maps, by the shadows of your character projected on the walls.
But for you to realize the beauty of CS2's graphics you have to play at least in 1080p, most play in 720p.
cs2, being a version of csgo, shouldn't be more beautiful than r6, but for some reason it is.
When you enter r6 nowadays you realize you are in an old game. And I always thought this game was beautiful.
@@diceslayer1CS2 is calculus and r6 is counting.
when doing the recoil comparison you need to aim down the sights in rainbow as that is how most of the shooting will be done
Pretty good, and you know, siege is almost 9 years old
U know cs is just a update from csgo, 13 year old game
@@nguyenngocanhquan4tc-20acn7 cs2 uses a new engine, while siege uses an old engine built in 2014 specifically for siege
But maps were he displayed "graphics quality" were from 2012 aka office, that map hasn't changed, it even has got downdrades in some ways, for example till i think 2017 windows were shootable and bullets left holes were windows were shot and rest of window just shattered and stayed till player walked through or nade exploded it or if player made bigger holes with bullets. And the small objects were more destructible, but in cs2 they really went for compettetive game type and removed a buch of stuff
I have 10 thousand hours of cs and 5 thousand hours of r6. and I'll tell you, for some reason the R6 has mibile graphics. This game already had better graphics.
CS2, which is a current version of CSGO, even with the same maps just ported, presents more current graphics than R6.
Look at the CS2 smoke and compare it to the R6 smoke. Look at the water in the CS2 and compare it with the water in the R6.
I stopped playing r6 for a few months and when I started playing again, I was scared by the poor graphics. I don't know what ubsoft did with this game.
As for CS2, whenever I'm playing, I never tire of being enchanted by the reflection of the lights on the weapons, by the physics of the smoke, by the lighting in some points on the maps, by the shadows of your character projected on the walls.
But for you to realize the beauty of CS2's graphics you have to play at least in 1080p, most play in 720p.
cs2, being a version of csgo, shouldn't be more beautiful than r6, but for some reason it is.
When you enter r6 nowadays you realize you are in an old game. And I always thought this game was beautiful.
R6 water isn’t made well because in the maps of the game u can’t find any type of water beside of the background water u can find in the map Kanal or Yatch which has no functionality in terms of gameplay
So the deciding factor in weather it's good or not in water? Are you a fish
Uhm csgo water also doesnt have any functionality and its not visible on many places
@@brawldude2656 ancient and anubis in CS2 have a lot of water, and R6 Siege has none that is accessible
4:03 you are not actually hitting the water tho, but the platform
0:24 that's not realistic, it's just competetive shooter feature 🤣Trust me, I'm a soldier
You shot a wall for a door and you forgot to aim 99% of the time
I'm astonished how this guy managed to find a "door" in the doorless R6S :D
remeber that cs2 is competitive game that is optimised in a way to run on almost all type of computers, the things that are done in rainbow six are also possible in cs, but the maps are made in a way so you can have a good and playable competitive expirience without needing a beefy pc
Well actually siege runs better on most pc cuz source 2 is an unoptimized piece of shit
Cs2 is harder to run than r6.
Bro forgot that siege is about tactics and the ability to create holes in walls for better views and that the recoil is kinda more realistic than the cs 2. My guy, counter strike might be the og of competitive team tactical shooter but siege is just the upgrade. I love both tho... more so because i played counter strike 1.6 when it came out😂.
Good joke siege recoil r not realistic by any means.
Also how siege is upgrade?siege is not even close to cs2 when it comes to graphic part.
@@Killer_bear-j8s nope it ain't... i was drunk when I wrote that dumbass shit.
Coming from an Environment Artist, R6 is one of the best games out there for it's graphics to performance ratio. The Environments are still holding up to our standards today and has really wwll lighting despite running ridiculously good on even lower end machines. CS definitely went in more what we can call semi stylized look. And the video certainly misses out on things R6 is made for.
CS2 is a game developed with Source 2 architecture. R6 is a game released in 2015. It would be more accurate to compare r6 and csgo. It was better than CS:GO, but now it is an old and 10 year old game.
u forgot to change the logo of the game in 2:17 bro
Even tho cs2 grenade has a cooler animation siege grenades are more realistic. Grenades don't really cause fiery explosion. 6:50
4:57 cap in r6 recoil is ez if you can't control idk bro
5:05 Weapons are not "extremely challenging to control" in r6s, just aim down sights ffs
siege has shadow but not visible for your own character
1st I think 🤔. Btw wassup bro
Hey there! I appreciate you being the first to comment! Not much, just working on more content for you all. How about you? What's up on your end, bro? 😄
in true cs fashion just had to bring up the volumetric smoke
0:13 This looks like a foam not smoke 😂😂
Way better than siege.
@@Killer_bear-j8s Dgas about siege, never played it
Well lets cook that chicken 3:07
Dude it's a 5 year difference
More actually
8 year
CS2 2025, you hit enemy and he dont get damage. Fake death animation etc... 😂😂😂
Why does rainbow six siege look so good
because it is the better game
@@s0meRand0m129💀💀💀
@@Pr0xyyGGhe is right, cs is shit
@@s0meRand0m129 bro 💀💀
@@s0meRand0m129☠️☠️☠️☠️
If rage bait was a video
Somehow siege runs better than CS2
"somehow"
somehow palpatine returned@@iagohb
Palpatine returning doesn't make much sense, but siege running better than cs2 does @@Shamoneee
Source 2 sure is something
I think rainbow is more than cs2
9 years old siege is better than new counter strike😂😂
8*
Bud's talking crap that a 2023 game is worse than a 2015 game even though they're not the same 💀💀
Do u have eyes?CS2 has far better graphics than siege.
@@Killer_bear-j8s And it runs like absolute dogshit because of it
@@Artician its not properly optimized
noob hitbox game vs better hitbox game
R6>>>
rainbow six is the best
its not bro cs2 faceit is harder in competitive