Sony Plan to Ditch OLED & Use Mini LED for 2024 Flagship TV. Here's Why
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 30 июн 2024
- Sony is pivoting from OLED to Mini LED as the display technology of choice for its 2024 flagship TV. Here are the reasons as explained by Sony in a Tokyo media briefing.
The "Includes Paid Promotion" message in this video refers to the sponsorship by UK electrical retailer Crampton & Moore. If you're thinking about buying a new TV, even if it's not the new Sony Mini LED TV, please support this channel by considering buying from them. Call 0113 244 6607, or click the link below for more details:
www.cramptonandmoore.co.uk/tv...
========================
**Click Below to SUBSCRIBE for More Reviews, Sneak Peeks & Tips:
/ @hdtvtest
========================
VISIT HDTV Test
www.hdtvtest.co.uk/
FOLLOW US!
www.threads.net/@hdtvtest
/ hdtvtest
/ hdtvtest
/ vincent_teoh
/ hdtvtest 
Наука
I don’t think the ultimate TV customer cares how much power a TV uses. It cares whether the picture is great or not . Black levels are very important to the video connoisseur.
Black levels are great on just about any tv you get today, whether oled or not. Brightness is where you get a really good TV.
@@scythelord Viewing angles, black levels, contrast and colors are not even close to compete with OLED.
@@scythelordOLED TVs already get super bright.
You would be wrong with that assumption. People in europe have high electricity costs, and when you use a TV or other devices (PCs, consoles etc.) a lot, it energy efficiency because pretty important.
@@XennialGeek Europe wouldn't be suffering under such high energy costs if they hadn't let the U.S. dupe them into helping antagonize Russia with coups & NATO encroachment.
"this means you are still failing, but with more effort..." - made my day, thank you! :)
"Still failing, but going in the right direction" is how I'd put it.
@@IMelkor42 Exactly. They have unlocked an improvement. That's gotta be appreciated.
I just bought my first Oled and am blown away by the picture
Yes, I love Vincent's complete analysis (some of which is beyond me, but I'm learning! LOL) but if you see an OLED in the flesh, the picture quality is amazing and takes your breath away. I understand everyone has different standards and needs, especially gamers. But the average person will be more than satisfied with an OLED TV.
That demo with only the backlights enabled on the two mini leds versus the OLED was really interesting to see
But it also highlights a key problem with FALD displays, the backlight LEDs lag the image being displayed. You can see how the image jump cuts (no fade/transition) at 6:44 between each scene (use the OLED as reference), but the LEDs are clearly taking a while to go from fully dim to whatever light level they need to achieve. This creates a very distorted imagine for about 300ms, easy to miss on most content, but it drives me crazy on a bunch of games that I play.
Yeah, I like when manufacturers do stuff like that
@@MaMuSlol that's interesting, I was worried about this when getting a miniled tv but I've never noticed it in movies/games
I hope the dimming zones density will increase drastically over the next years. The current density is too low for my taste, you usually can see a lot of blooming in some content.
You are literally watching this on whatever you own. The side by side comparison is literally displayed on your TV or monitor. Bear it in mind when you notice differences...
OLED reignited my love for home cinema. Going back to LCD, regardless of the backlight, is going to be tough.
You won't have to.
Since I went OLED black I'l never go back!
I could never go back to LCD personally
I've had too many burn-in issues with OLEDs. Got the X95L and it's fantastic.
I can't wait to go back to mini led personally. I'm tired of my screen dimming when watching sports and playing games. And the lack of full field brightness is really distracting when watching high luminance content. I have the a90j and x930e and I still, in may aspects, think the x930e pops more in hdr
Sony: We expect content creators to push high brightness levels.
Content Creators: Darkness levels it is.
Not to mention if they ***just*** came out with the new mastering monitor, how long will it be till we can even watch a movie that was made with it?
Especially idiotic, when there is only like 1% of movies and 4K blu rays to be rated above 1000 nits
@@wile123456this is what Dolby Vision is for. Only HDR10 is limited to 1000 nits.
@@mtrebtreboschi5722let’s put it this way. Avatar 2 was using the Sony Venice camera YEARS before it was released to the public. It’s just how the creation industry works. Same with Top Gun
Game of Thrones The Long Night and House of Dragon episode only look shit on cable/Satalite and streaming because of compression on Blu ray disc)4K Blu ray disc both episodes where clear.
I am so happy with my OLED, that I can't see myself switching to another panel technology any time soon.
once you go oled, you don't go back
Agreed, but it sure would be nice to have a QD-OLED panel that hits at or close to 100” in a price range of no more than $10K. The picture on my A90J 83” Master Series is still breathtaking, and I won’t go smaller in size - only larger.
@@darkknight2864 which model? I find that hard to believe there's burn in "everywhere", I have the alienware oled monitor and I have no burn in at all. Unless you've just been blasting HDR on normal computer usage
@@nathanbraun2067 if they bring this to 98" Then it will be a great alternative
@@993mike seriously, how hard can it be to make a TV 20 inches larger without charging 5x the price?
It's cheaper to make but I'll bet the pricing will be on par with other OLEDs being a 'flagship' and new technology. The idea that customers will save is corporate spin BS
100pct I agree
Paying for a service more than a product 😅
Yeah Oled will be more affordable cuz Sony is greedy.
Yes and no. Once the tech is launched it will be copied and sold for less.
you know shit about competition, they will offer better prices than similar quality, that is the way to compete and win and make more profit, profit is the goal, not about being nice.
It was good to see Vincent on Digital Trends. Even if it was only brief
Top 5 anime crossovers
Top 5 tv crossovers
Like in the background or actually talking? Gotta look for it.
@@yappa6222in the background
A95L continues through 2024 as the OLED flagship. Makes sense for Sony to take that gap year and make a comeback in the LCD sector, especially with no real improvements from Samsung Display’s panels this year. Looking forward to seeing how the X95M performs next to the BVM-HX310 in your tests.
That’s right. The A95L will be the top Oled dog for 2024, so Sony can bring a top mini LCDTV for 2024 with improvements than last years X95L, which was the best Mini-LED in the market and was widely praised.
Yeah I wanna save up for an A95L
The X95L was absolutely insane, could it really be that much better?
No matter how good the dimming is on this flagship Mini LED TV, there will be some blooming artifacts. I was planning on buying a new TV this year, so I think I’ll stick with the A95L when it’s on a good sale.
@@oppa1319 in business n Mareketing. Professor train us about SONY TV Business model idental to BMW : they produce VERY HIGH END TV on the show, having all the influncers talk about it. Then the GOAL is to NOT having MOST ppl own it . Because if u own it, u will NOT want to up grade for at least 4-5 yrs. Slows down sales. Also ruins lower tier TVs sale. So they will always PRODUCE this ….insane tv like RoceRoyce level, give to Hollywood for FREE, call it “reference Monitor” to UP the market value. Then they want 99.9% ppl buy the 2 tier down. Because thoes ppl are MOST prone to “upgrade” Lured by NEW Launch of “CES flagship” nest year n year after .
SONY’s MONEY Come from Tier downs. U will BE shocked they --LOSE- money produce A95L n those REFERENCE monitors. They MAKE money over A80L X90L ….etc n below. D EXACT reason they PRODUCE X95L in only 85”. It’s NOT for MOST ppl to own. They want a few get it to show off, they do NOT want ppl to have it. They also want to make it so large that ppl will pay Extra for A95L.
YES,,,,,U will see a “better” tv than X95L. But for Flagship, expect to be HUGE n over priced. That they will do WELL at SHOOTOUT knowing MOST ppl will buy Tier down or TIERS down. Cuz the LOW budget PPL actually PROFIT the SONY NOT the flagship. They LOSE MONEY producing Flagship.
Strangest thing…u only hear in Business School.
I’m on a CX and I’ll be waiting for fully phosphorescent OLED to upgrade. Massive increase in efficiency that should effectively eliminate burn in while increasing brightness. MLA should be a standard feature by that point as well.
Same here, especially exciting monitor-wise when they switch to RGB subpixels
CX is a massive step down from just the C2 or C3 with MLA. Waiting for that is like going from a Calculator to a Supercomputer. Good luck with that
@@DNGR369 What are you talking about? The C2 is basically imperceptibly different than the CX other than improved viewing angles, and the C3 is up to 20% brighter in HDR, and like 5% brighter in SDR. Color Gamut identical between all 3 TVs. If I upgraded to a C3, an argument could be made that for the majority of content, I might not even notice a difference.
@@suni08 Oh absolutely mandatory before I’d consider buying an OLED computer monitor. The way I use my computer monitor would be absolutely abusive to my TV.
@@MechAdv Using a G2 as a monitor (before that the B8, and both) without issues here on my gaming rig. But I can imagine in office use cases it wouldn't be desirable.
I also own a HTC Vive vr headset with OLED panels and a HTC Vive Pro2 with LCD panels but whilst the resolution is higher the original Vive outshines the newer Vive Pro2 in dark scenes. If you are playing a driving/racing game in night time conditions with little light elements it will seem as if you are driving in a fog with the Vive Pro2.
Also I bought a Samsung Galaxy S20+ with AMOLED and after that a Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 with LCD panel... again a dissapointment.
If it's not OLED nowadays I am not going to buy it anymore. It is just causing me to be annoyed with the poor image quality and a backlight display is more tiring for the eyes than a self-emissive display, so even for eye strain and fatigue I'd prefer OLED.
I love how Vincent provides more detail, the bits that help you understand why something works or doesn't work.
6:58 You can't beat OLEDs response time.
But it also is not really a thing, because content is 60-144 hz or 16-6.9ms.
Which is part of why OLED sucks. The horrible stuttering on OLEDs as a result of high response times defeats the benefits.
@@needsmoreclippingwhat do you mean? They were saying that OLEDs have great (almost instant) response times. Not that they don’t have good response times.
@@erickbodom10v312that same instant pixel response time creates a distracting strobing effect when a continuous pattern is displayed, BFI was set to remedy this but the panel takes a massive hit in brightness, reduces your frame-rate by half, disables vrr and other processes, and it obviously increases the response time
@@erickbodom10v312 Near instant response times are not a good thing for motion it turns out.
I purchased my first OLED in 2020, a 77 LG CX, after hearing horror stories of burn in but also hearing how great the picture looks on those tv's. Well, after a little over 3 years, I am never, ever buying an LCD tv again. I was upgrading LCD tv's almost every year before getting the CX due to one issue or another (blooming, slow response times, HDMI handshake issues), but the CX has been the best TV I have owned and when it's time to replace it, I will only replace it with another OLED. I host movie night at my house and even though the CX is considered fairly old at this point, people still comment on how great the picture looks while we watch movies. I want to try the Sony OLED but the lack of 2.1 HDMI inputs has so far kept me away from them. As far as energy use, I couldn't care less and I believe this is nonsense that Sony is coming up with to sell LCD tv's for for a premium price, only to make a bigger profit.
I felt the same way as you did back in the day with Plasma TVs. Except, I knew not to even buy a LCD TV in the first place. I went from CRT TVs straight to Plasma TVs, then straight to OLED TVs.
Lcd is horrible
@@wakaflockaproject I agree but I also think that the majority of the population doesn't see a difference and believe all tv's are the same. I went over to my neighbors house a few months ago and noticed a pink halo all around the entire screen, the screen was burned out all around the edges, but they didn't even notice until I pointed it out to them. I would say they represent the regular consumer who believes that a 300 dollar TCL or Westinghouse LCD is comparable to a 3000 or 4000 dollar OLED panel because they look the same in the store, under bright lights and in VIVID mode, which their new tv is set to, with all the motion settings set to HIGH. I stopped providing any input cause it's their tv and they're enjoying it, so who am I to say they're doing it wrong.
Same here. My cx is 3 years old old never a single problem..
@@Bug13I always prefer saving $2,700 on something that’s going to die in a few years 😂
Thank you for yet another outstanding video with your excellent knack for detailed descriptions and tremendous knowledge!
Well, time to pull the trigger on the A95L. Although I may wait a month to take advantage of price drops, if any.
I was about to do the same thing, however the much touted A95L Multiview feature (side by side, split screen) has not been delivered by Sony. If Sony is canning the A95L, it's a fair bet Multiview will never see the light of day.
Not good, I want to be able to play a video game over HDMI on one side while following a RUclips tutorial on the other. I want to keep an eye on a sports event while watching a movie, etc. Can't do any of that without Multiview. Looks like it's going to be LG. Sad.
The vast majority of people keep their TVs for a long period of time. I remember the days of Trinitron where the tv would last decades and corss generations. Mini LED would ensure longevity, and would make more practical sense for most consumers. With OLED you get outstanding image quality that degrades over time. Mini LED gives more consistent image quality over time, given a bit of tradeoff with image quality, which will be more acceptable to most consumers.
I'm using an LCD TV from the 2000s. I like the small screen and it has very good front-facing speakers.
Nothing is ensuring longevity these days because the software will eventually go out of support and become a hazard for hacking in your private network, it will miss out on support for new HDR modes, and the new HDCP encryption required to display content in a way that's harder to pilot means eventually any TV purchased today simply won't work for most content eventually. Isn't the future grand?
@@DemmrirYou can use the TV without Internet in fact you should use it offline as soon as you get proper equipment..
Not only does the embedded software gets dated within a couple years.. but processing power of the TV gets split between picture quality and having to render the interface of the internal apps..
That's why several features are disabled until you use an external source.
Ahhh i kinda miss my old 300 pound 32" trinitron wega.. except when i had to move it
"Once you go black, you never go back".
After I made the switch to OLED and considering how completely and utterly satisfied me myself, my family, friends, everyone who watches movies on my OLED-TV are, this is the panel technology I will stay at.
As usual Vincent you break the news down the best.
That's certainly surprising. I wonder whether it's a decision that makes sense for the general customer (who never touches the settings and watches a variety of content in random lighting conditions) but not for the enthusiast who is willing to spend the time and watts for the best possible experience? I can't wait to see Vincent's review comparing the final TV with the top-tier models and see what the real-world results are like.
Basically the best TV Sony will sell in 2024 will be the A95L. Simpls
OLEDs are the lowest selling TVs for any brand lol
@@DV-ou1yuI think OP meant the best-quality TV, not the best-selling one
@felixfourcolor You are correct. Read it wrong lol
That's because people don't know anything.😂
@@cmontes7961Also most people are broke.
It's probably because Sony needs to keep the margins and improve sales. They cant't keep the prices low enough if Samsung doesn't sell them the panels at a low enough cost.
Yes cause they fucked up with pricing in Europe and barely anyone is choosing Sony over LG or Samsung. Low energy use nice but I doubt we will see much noticeable image improvement over X95L. G4 will provide even better picture this year and Sony not releasing new oled will loose even more sales.
@@whitecrowuk575what are you smoking lol. LGs OLED sales are in the toilet this year and next year is basically a copy and paste of this year.
Samsung's doing well but I think consumers will end up regretting it.
@@salesfocus6270lg had over 66% market share in 22 on oleds and last year bit over 30% so not too bad imo
@@salesfocus6270hey, where is your Data from?
@@salesfocus6270 no data has been released for a year yet so the only person smoking something is you. G3 can be had for 60% price of A95L. In UK barely anyone buys Sony for that reason. Either Samsung or LG. Sony is awful value here
I’ll be purchasing a new flagship 85” tv this year and have always loved my Sony tv’s. Should I expect to see this new tech in a 85” display this year?? Probably need to buy around May due to a move.
thank you! very informative...
I wonder how this advanced led processing will affect backlight speed in gaming mode?
My brother bought the s90c qd oled 55 inches and i bought the qn90b mini qled 55 inches. When we compared both side by side we couldn't see any major differences apart from the obvious perfect black levels of the qd oled and that was only when we made the room pitch black with no light pollution at all, and of course the advantage of brightness the qn90b has over every other tv out there, but still both amazing with their advantages and disadvantages, you simply can't have it all in one for the time being. Now when it comes to Sony as a previous user of a sony tv, well it had its issues but it wasn't a flagship and I've seen Sony's flagships last very long with no signs of quality degradation at all.
Oh well, let’s get those liquidation savings on Sony OLEDs then. I’m ready!
This right here.
Power use on TVs seems pointless, the draws are minuscule compared to refrigerator or dryer…
True, and half the year they are helping to heat your home anyway.
Depends on the fridge. Mine draws 34W avg, according to Energy Star. Dryer is infrequent enough to not be enormous. Most places, A/C is major though.
Some mini led can hit 800w
@@maou5025 Peak power is only relevant to circuit design, not to consumption. My electric kettle is 1500W, but its consumption is negligible.
@@concinnusYour electric Kettle doesn't run the full season of a Netflix Series.
I'm calling it now...Sony will release a QD-OLED A95M once Samsung implements phosphorescent OLED. This feels like a stop gap move to let the Panel prices go down. Also since Sony has position the brand as Premium brand, they will see sales drop in the year(s) in between the transition to phosphorescent OLED. Most AV companies/Installers will still continue to push OLED as the only premium choice for their clients.
Same way they told me in the 90s plasma was it
@@frostgodxplasma WAS it. Plasma was the best picture until they quit making it in 2014. Plasma had deep blacks and natural skin tones that LED couldn't match. My Pioneer Elite 60 inch still works beautifully, though it has been moved to my bedroom in favor of my Sony A95L 77 inch which now graces my living room.
Plasmas were heavy. Heavy means less profits for TV manufacturers due to increased shipping costs. Heavy means installers need help, so installation costs more for the average consumer that can't do it themselves because they are paying two installers instead of one. And plasma was just better than its competition in terms of video quality in its day, and more complicated to manufacture, so it cost more to start with. There are lots of reasons why one technology dies while another continues. Most consumers are looking for low prices. Not nearly as many are looking for quality.
LOL@@frostgodx
Honestly I've had a LG OLED and now own a TCL mini led QLED, I am amazed with the quality of the picture on the TCL. I still prefer the LG but the quality is very close and we're talking about TCL here not Sony so I have very high hopes for a Sony mini led tv!
Are you talking about qm8?
@@chembsajin5235 No I have the 55r646.
I don't watch TV enough to justify buying a OLED, so went the same route, and while OLED's certainly look better - it's not like it used to be, the gap has narrowed a decent amount, so if you're not someone always watching TV, OLED is a hard sell with it's price point, and how good some of the higher end LED's have gotten recently.
I have one of their 2023 mini led tvs, it's really good and I've enjoyed it thoroughly.
Interesting thanks for the information. I enjoy the breakdown of the technology in your videos. I am less interested in power consumption for a tv. Instead I like high-quality 4K images with fast processing and low latency. I use my tv mainly for gaming and streaming like netflix and hulu etc. So features that improve those functions are appreciated. I enjoy the true black of the OLED. Waiting for the QOLED tvs to come out.
I would still buy oled as my new TV in 2024 if I would decide to upgrade my current oled one... it's the best tv you can get, quality of the picture/blacks by far.
too dim
@@racephase not for me.. I use my TV as a PC monitor and never had this problem.. if anything, during night it feels too bright compared to my other 2 older monitors... and during day I have curtains if it's too sunny which in UK is not very often xD
One major downside of this is that now with this News arriving, we can't expect prices for A95L to drop anytime soon then 😕
Ouch...haven't considered that as well....
I hope the price goes down. Up in Canada they want $4999 for the A95L 65 inch and I have seen the same size of LG G3 on sale for$3098. You can't convince me that the Sony at $1900 more is that huge of an improvement in picture. If that price doesn't come down a good margin then I am buying the G3
It won't drop. Sony keeps very tight control of inventory on the Master series which is why the 95K never got discounted much at all.
@@flynncrawford1960i bought the 77 G3. Pretty amazing tv!
In Lithuania A95L 65 inch screen size price - from
3 400,00 Euros.
@@flynncrawford1960 LG TV's track you, Sony (as far as I'm aware) do not, however with their recent controversy surrounding removing Discovery purchased content it's difficult to trust any company nowadays.
This makes me so happy I bought the 77" A95L this year.
I love this guys reviews on display technology! 🙏 Now he just needs to tell me what the cheapest 45-50 inch screen is with 4k, 120fps, Freesync, HDR10, low input latency & good brightness is that would work great as computer screens so I can replace my 2nd gen 6 series Samsungs that are over 7 years old and delaminating from backlight panels and flickering like crazy.
6:10 That should reduce flicker somewhat (making the peaks less bright, and making them last for longer before going black), but certainly not remove it. Are there any flicker-free mini LED TVs?
When I bought my LG C1, there were literally just a few flicker-free non-OLED TVs of any kind on the market (most of which were Sonys).
Can you Tell me the Flicker free OLED tv's :)?
@@cardinalroma7495 Almost all of them should be very close to flicker free, only having a tiny dip in brightness at the refresh rate, so usually 120 Hz. The dip is way smaller than the dip in an incandescant light bulb (at 100/120 Hz), so anyone who could tolerate them should be able to tolerate OLEDs!
RTINGS always tests for this in their reviews, so check there. You can even filter on it.
Lol notice they dont have QD OLED in the comparison.
Thank you, Vincent
You can see the massive bloom in the first comparison between OLED and miniLED already ...
I have two mini led products and I can tell you the only problem has been flight simulator 2020 at night. That's it!
I have the qn90b, and let me tell you that if you setup the tv properly you can barely notice the blooming. If you raise everything at max then yes it won't only have blooming but it will scorch your eyeballs as well. Oleds are great but they are still weak compared to mini qleds. I had the C1 for about a year and i sold it to get the qn90b, because i couldn't see a damn thing during the day. So my brother bought the s90c qd oled for 1.500 euros, and i bought the qn90b on discount for 870 euros, but the s90c no matter if it's a qd oled it still suffers from that brightness weakness, which is a shame if you consider its price, a step up from regular oleds yes but still behind mini qleds. The qn90b is still far superior in this department let me tell you like any other flagship mini qled in the price range of the qn90b.
Its due to it being filmed. When you see it in person the blooming can’t be seen
Typically spoken by someone who doesn't know anything. Like that other guy said, in person you don't see any blooming for most part with the top LCD TV's. Only if you're watching in a perfectly dark room you might notice slight blooming. What you see on a youtube video is not representative to what you see in-person at all. Sadly most OLED fanboys don't seem to be aware of this fact.
And the fact is that the best of OLED and the best of LED (which I also count mini-LED under) have pretty minor differences. LED can get brighter, OLED has a slight advantage in very dark rooms and some specific types of scenes like a night sky with stars. Outside of those specific scenes you won't even notice a difference for even the dark scenes unless you're in a perfectly dark room (and even then it's a minor difference).
It's a shame RUclipsrs don't properly cover this and just OLED wank all the way for most part.
@@thenonexistinghero that's utter copium. oled has massively better response times, lower input latency, way better dark image detail, better black levels, no blooming (YES YOU CAN SEE IT if you take off the bias-tinted glasses), better almost everything other than full screen brightness. youtubers say what they say because it's what they see and they don't have an agenda to cover, like you do.
That's strategy. To show independence. This goes in the direction of Samsung and LG in the form: "Hey look here, if you don't give us a good price for OLED, we won't buy anything, we'll build mini-LED instead." It's similar to what Samsung is doing with the Exynos: "Hey, look here, give us a cheap Snapdragon chips because we could also switch everything to Exynos..."
What? Lol samsung is making there own qd oled panels haha. The only oled panels they buy from lg are regular oled and they will have an 80 series oled this year. Just no qd oled. Sony doesn't usually make flagship master seriees oled tvs every year. They skipped a year after releasing the a90j also. This is nornal with sony but again there flagship qd oled panels are made by Samsung not lg. Lg only makes wrgb oled panels.
First of all, LOL! Sony doesn't care about its customers so that "strategy" and "independence" is solely for their bottom line and nothing else. No reason to celebrate that as a consumer. This is the company that installed rootkits on their CDs to infect the computers of those they thought were stealing their music. They also just removed a ton of content from people's PS libraries that they paid for and thought it was all cool to just steal from their customers. It took a tsunami of internet backlash for them to reverse the baffling decision. Point being? Sony does not GAF about its customers, only its bottom line. Same could likely be said by most if not all companies and that's fine. But then there's no reason to admire their strategy if it's also their strategy to extract as much money from your wallet as possible.
Regardless, this doesn't change that, at the end of the day, OLED is simply superior from an image quality standpoint. Consumers in search of the best image quality were virtually always steered to Sony OLEDs year after year. That won't be the case for 2024 and whether they were showing "independence" or not, they still left a lot of cash on the table and likely irritated a lot of their fans who were waiting for this year's OLED offering instead of buying last year's. Kinda silly to lose BOTH image quality and irritate your customers all for the sake of "independence". Perhaps they could, idk, charge less for their insanely overpriced offerings and maybe even include 4 2.1 HDMI ports by default?...
@@reviewforthetube6485 -i don not know what you are talking about. Sony can buy oled from Samsung or LG. I f they show that their flagship will be mini-led, this will do cause pressure to OLED sellers which want to sell their OLED panels...
@@daisyduck8593 samsung and Sony don't hsve an issue. Lg and Sony have but that's it. That was my point. Believe me we will see more qd oled tvs. A1e, a9g and a90j were all skip years Sony does this. They srent going to release a master series oled or qd oled every year. Especially when the a95l was just released a few months ago and alot of countries still have them on back order. This is normal for Sony.
@@daisyduck8593 but I do get what you were saying now but Sony isn't having issues with Samsung. My mind goes to lg and Sony issues in the past with panels so in my mind samsung and Sony are fine.
Having made the switch to OLED, I can’t see myself ever willingly using an LCD again, unless it’s a mature microLED panel.
How do you deal with the burned images and all the dead pixels?
@@FreshLyte Haven't had any issue with either and, honestly, don't expect to.
@@avenged110 i'm getting some dead pixels around the edges of both my lg b9 and my c1. it is certainly less distracting than the dirty screen effect i usually got from LCDs tvs at this age, not to mention less distracting than all of the natural image defects of an LCD tv. a worn out oled is still better than a brand new lcd. no burn in, though. both of them still 100% clear.
6:44 this summary the video, and it is more than impressive. If last x95l was so good, i cannot wait until this year version.
So long as they dont skimp on the resolution support (as in support 1440p) get the panel to 144hz and give us lots of full bandwidth 2.1 ports, sounds good to me. Of course, some FPR 3D support would really kick this into the must buy section though.
Why would a TV makers waste time as resources on an irrelevant resolution? TVs should *avoid* 1440p as even the really inexpensive TVs can do 4k.
@@AntonioCunninghamExactly they should just get a high end monitor for 1440p.
Pretty big move considering the industry marketing has been OLED OLED OLED for years now. Now the flagship is going to be an LED. Interesting to see how they compare.
In game mode, horrible, because backlight control is turned down to a few zones only. No LCD TV with FALD/Mini LED backlight does well in gaming, because you loose tons of IQ -or- get 200-300ms of added input lag. Backlight control is slow.
@@Dr.WhetFarts You couldn't be more wrong, but it's to be expected that rabid OLED fanboys get their facts wrong.
The 'flagship' for Sony might be an LED; but it won't be the flagship for the industry.
OLED will still get destroyed by the LED when compared in anything other than a completely dark room.
@@jaimem1788 Nope. Not even close to true. I've owned both. LED looks presentable in a brightly lit room, but that's it. The only LCD I have worth owning is HP's DreamColor monitor. Fantastic picture in terms of color volume (98% Adobe RGB); but it lacks contrast ratio and black level compared to OLED.
The backlight technology is certainly impressive, but aside blooming which is getting better and better, what it is a bit offputing for me compared to any OLED display is this kind of latency particularly visible at 6:46, the time it takes to go from one brightness to another... (I say that but i do have a fald tv myself and i'm ok with it ^^)
Some brands already have made blooming completely disappear (TCL)
I only read the title. I am super happy! Finally TVs again that don't degrade in a mere year.
Thanks for doing what you do man!
I'm really curious how this stacks up against OLED TV... and honestly I'll probably still
buy a 55" LG OLED TV for gaming... lol.
But I am still curious.
HEY, I took SCIENCE side programs in university when my main focus was Interntantinal business, exporting/importing, Market expansion. So FYI the OLED was always OVER RATED tech (explained in business school) that make consumer RUSH to buy. When manipulate our believe that d “BEST….Experience is…..” that change our perception of “want” to a “NEED”. For example if they make guys believe “if u want BEST Drivin experience , get Standard car, if u get Auotmatic, its NOT as FULL Masculin man will do, its MOm car >….” Suddenly it make ppl believe its a MUST for Tech, n also internally believe its also a MUST for Image. N all echo chamber .it turn out Standard cars are most PAin i the ASS, those SUVARU Impreza WRX OMG so annoying. U need 2 arms all the time. In fact the standard n Automatic are just Side by Side, Apple vs Google type of thing. But when consumer made to believe its a “MUST” or “HAVE to” . They live thru fear. They r willing to pay 2X money. OLED marketing knows.
And IN Science/health program….our PHD professor scientist coach us about EYES. lol at passing at END of semester she was coaching us about TV watching . D FUNNIEST “useless topic” lol i thought why i need that.
Apparently she ask :” do u see what’s AROUND u when u driving in pitch black country road or highway?” “How come the CAR lights are so bright but the things at side moving fast u see it but u do NOT SEE it.” “ WHY ppl always run deers over ?? Or run ppl over even they were in front of them ???” “Can u see ppl’s face in movie Theater when lights are Dim” ? “ Can we see ppl’s FACE , arm tattoos clear when they are UNDER the LARGE TREE shadow when u are In mid bright parking lot racking them??? If it’s too dim at night but now a LOT of sun? “ “how about MALL, why is MALL creat the MOST bright lights but comforting n u SEE d MOST?? “
Yeah our FOCUS level is only RIGHT in front of us. We see only 30% in the MIDDLE of TV( if u sit close) d rest are seen in peripheral vision. U see but u don’t Focus on those Trim. In IMAX movies, the scenes are always at Center of Tv.so even tho screen so big most things are in the middle so our eyes don’t move much in Theater. BUT when we play Video game, watching sports. We need to have eyes seeing moving image constantly, we NEED OUR BRAIN to -Make sense of something Instnatly even thru our peripheral vision. It’s d BRAIN makes the judgement of its “a thing in 3D” or “background Noise “ being filtered away/not registered.
If we use OLED tv play a LOT of video games, oftenly a LOT of things will look Dim. Yes the highlight look okay, just the things are MEDIUM colored are VERY DIM, u watching OLED tv when AVERAGE scenes are as dim as iPhone 3GS to iPhone 6 in bright room experience. That even OLED is FAST response, the HUMAN biology our BRAIN can NOT process those dim dull image in the shadows FAST enough. For example if in dim room , 5 zombies combing up the 1-2 coming from way back back but way to dim….that u wont even see it till up closer. The same Diufference that Driving at END of Sunset, the 15 min before Full Sundown to 5 min before Full Sundown. Both dim but makes epic difference subtle but VERY large impact how MUCH/fast enough your EYES can SEE decided by d “BRAIN” .
Of courses SONY LG know that. They are in cohorts for longest time to PROMOTE OLED as premium . In a lot of ppls mind they are MORE of Dim n underwhelming.
Yeah dude the Hisense, TCL MINI LED are insane seriously. That Hisense ADS-PRO OLED visual 75” i want that one. In the store employees all came to ask me about it when i was playing with the Remote. Even the dude checking Sony A95K was like kept asking me about it. Because just image quality speaks volume 😊
The last, and I mean dead last thing I care about is the power consumption of my tv.
Personally I’m anal about it even if I know deep down it’s only costing me the price of a few energy drinks a year. Someone leaving a TV on for hours not doing anything drives me nuts lol
Said Panasonic plasma owners...
@@1MTEKguilty as charged. My 14 year old G25 still has a great picture. I bought a oled last week because I wanted a bigger screen size. I don’t know….can’t get used to the dark picture.
As if most people are content creators…lol wtf is sony thinking? 😂
I'm sure it will take years, until we see movies that hit 4K nits. Right now, most movies don't push TVs too much. Content needs to catch up or the higher nits etc will be wasted.
great comment, finally someone actually thinking here lol
Exactly
@@paulc5389Believe it or not yes, when Sony started rolling out brighter displays it was the first time 480p content on my old DVDs & my laserdiscs finally looked good to me on modern displays, they now closely match how they used to look on my old boob tube TVs that glowed like a radioactive rod. It makes up for the low resolution and lower color palettes.
When I decided to get a new TV after many years, I expected to get an OLED, but ended up with an X90L because the increase in brightness was way more importatn to me than the blooming. It is rare that I notice the bloom, usually only in the credits, but the brightnes of daylight scens or special effects is very impactful.
Plus no burn in issues to worry about
Yeah most people don’t care about accurate colors, fluid motion and great viewing angles. Just make the display as bright as the sun.
@@ZackSNetwork I was very concerned about fluid motion, which is why I got the Sony. It's been a big concern of mine for a long time, and one fo the reasons I put off buying an expensive TV for so long, the jumpiness was so bad it was nauseating to watch. The Sonys were better than the LGs in this regard, and I didn't detect any difference between the backlit and OLED models. You're right about viewing angles, there is a limited area from which anyone will watch my TV, but I spent time examining this in stores, and again, something that was a big issue in the past is close to unnoticeable on modern TVs. Accurate colors are hard to judge, since there are so many ways shops can manipulate that via different settings, although I thought the Samsungs seemed too colorful.
People like OLEDs because they read they have infinite contrast, a function of the mathematics of dividing by zero, anything can have infinite contrast if it can shut all the way off, even if it's the dimmest TV in the world.
What equipment would you recommend for someone that wants to get something to try and calibrate their own displays.. or is it not worth doing?
What I'm hearing is that Sony sees higher profit margins on mini led tvs, and so they are putting marketing and engineering resources into driving that market even if it is inferior in overall picture quality to oled.
Will they drop prices below other OLEDs then? If not, it's going to be a hard sell. I still have to see a single LCD that comes close to OLEDs for my taste.
I can't see Sony discontinuing OLED. That would be stupid but we will see. Choice is important.
Howdy Vincent. Been a while since I've posted a comment on your channel (always watching though). I hope you had a good and healthy festive period. I have a request; since i understand you to be a man of impeccable colour accuracy. Could you possibly check out the new Forza games HDR implementation. I really enjoy this game, and on the series consoles for the most part it looks great. But the HDR definitely has something going on with it. I feel this needs your attention sir.
My Sony 85 ZG9 (from 2020, released in 2019) with 4000 !!! Nits is still absolutely stunning, especially for HDR movies.
Only major disadvantage it consumes 1kW! 😅
I am sure many movies will just pop with this technology, but I love the inky blacks of my OLED. I based my TV on the type of movies I watched. My list is like sci-fi, space, and horror so John Wick, Aliens, IT, Star Wars, Star Trek, Dark Knight Trilogy, etc...all look great. It is just a matter of compromising on brightness or blackness when deciding on what TV to buy. For some people, the blacks in the non-OLED are perfectly fine, so maybe those are a better option ? Only thing I hate is the OLED will probably get wrecked in trying to move it to another place.
are local contrast ratios on mini LED going through the roof with the increases in brightness, or is it the same old LCD problem just with brighter images?
Mini LED is a backlight type.
LCD is a panel type.
Mini LED is nothing more than a band-aid for LCD's weak contrast ratio.
The contrast ratio is tied to the number of local dimming zones.
OLED has 1:1 pixel level dimming which means over 8 million "dimming zones" for 4K resolution and over 33 million "dimming zones" for 8K resolution.
No Mini LED LCD TV will ever reach OLED's contrast ratio. EVER.
The closest consumer LCD TV that came the closest to OLED is the now-discontinued Hisense U9DG Dual Cell LCD TV which has a secondary 1080p grayscale panel behind the 4K main panel aka over 2 million local dimming zones.
@@PSYCHOV3N0M contrast ratio is overrated.
I have never walked into an electronic store, looked at the TVs and said that Mini LED looks better than that OLED. I doubt I will be saying that in 2024 either.
Because the SONY purposely make mini LED inferior to promote OLED that sells for 2X price. The technology is there. They produce the lower tier for makeing the OLED seem its “worthwhile”. It’s all markeing . So creat the perception of “better vs worse” like iPhone 15pro vs 15
Can't wait!
Hasn't Sony always (in the last few years at least) kept its "flagship" TV for 2 years before a new "flagship" comes out? So it really shouldn't be "news" that in 2024 Sony won't replace its A95L until 2025.
I dunno what youre talking about, a95l 2023, a95k 2022, a90j 2021.
@@mtrebtreboschi5722none of this makes sense because I thought the Z series was the flagship 😂
@@mtrebtreboschi5722Z series is Sony's flagship.
NOT the A series.
@@mtrebtreboschi5722a95k was not a master series tv. A90J then A95L
@@yanniobkirk5744 A95K was absolutely a master series. Also, their flagship and won best tv of the year. BRAVIA XR MASTER Series A95K, that is the official name of it on their site.
At the end of the day, Oled especially QD-Oled still provide pixel level light control with no blooming, wide colour gamut/volume and wider viewing angle due to it's characteristics. I think that these pros are considered as flagship instead of determine it by higher brightness.
Higher brightness effects the eyes and is not good for long periods also,Reason why i go to OLED
@@Jza-GZa40k It's not about the full screen being bright, it's about objects like lights, candles, reflections etc, being the proper brightness. A Tv that can't show the proper brightness, will have to tone map the image and that causes detail to be lost, on top of the improper brightness of the scene or object.
@@micker9830 OLED have the best contrast and pure black levels unmatched.
@@micker9830recommended brightness for using monitors during daytime is around 120 nits, for tvs that’s about 200 nits full screen at a distance.
Current OLEDs already achieve 300 nits or more full screen and 1000 nits highlights is plenty bright with current OLEDs, 2000 nits will be marginally better and 4000 nits will be too bright. Especially if you got light controlled room.
Sure progress is necessary, but OLEDs benefits like OP mentioned before, of pixel level control, viewing angles and wider gamut due to better contrast of panel matter too.
After trying OLED, there is no going back to MiniLED, next stop is phosphorescent blue or MicroLED 85-95’’ in 2030 for me, I am plenty happy with my S90C 77’’.
In SDR during a night time I already have to put it to 32 brightness (on scale of 50) or it’s too bright. In HDR at night time, it could benefit from maybe 2000 nits 10% window, but the image already wows everyone, for cartoonish movies Active tone mapping actually makes it too bright (that’s about 1300-1500 nits 2nd gen panel)
@@micker9830 anything using "zone" brightness and not individual pixel brightness is losing detail, zones are garbage
Reason why I bought mini led was due to reflection and burning issues with OLED…
You are the best bro.
I just bought a TCL QM8 (Mini Led) to replace my old LG Oled, it lasted a week the motion control was dreadful I tried every permutation of the motion smoothing control I just kept seeing jitter in fast moving scenes. I ended up giving it to my daughter and purchasing a LG C3
We need one dimming zone every 4 pixels squared
Never moved to oled due to burn-in worry and love bright screens. I own a Samsung 75"Q90R and use a mini led ASUS ROG Swift PG32UQX 32" 4K which I'm very impressed with for gaming with pc
Anybody else notice that the demonstration screen fit the Sony had color. I wonder if this is to help with color saturation?
Honestly shocked by this move.
Yeah,the lower cost of LCD and potential of higher profits is definitely the real reason. Higher brightness is just a side effect and the only positive thing PR could come up with.
follow the money seems like the correct take here.. otherwise they'd be increasing the # of backlights drastically vs profit margin
QD-OLEd cannot be improved on that much where as mini led can be improved on greatly with it's brightness, blacks and eliminating blooming. Sony has proven this with the X95L and it will be very apparent with their new flagship coming, There is also the fact Mini LED can come out in a 98 inch size without a ridiculous price nobody would pay for
Let me preface my comments by saying I've long been a fan of Sony TVs. My first new color TV was a 27" Sony Trinitron CRT. Then a decade later, I replaced that 27" Sony with the 35 inch XBR Sony flagship CRT that came out 6 months after DVD was introduced to the American market. And that particular 35" TV (a 198 lb. beast of a table model) was the exact Sony Trinitron 35" model that TV reviews recommended as the top TV for getting the best possible picture quality out of the then new DVD video format. And in our basement's dark theater room we now use a terrific Master Series Sony OLED that's a 77" version of the 65" A9G OLED which won a Value Electronics Shootout. So certainly, we've had a great run with Sony TVs, but I recall a claim Sony made for LCD TV as 1080p was the state of the art resolution, that makes me skeptical about Sony's claims for its newest local dimming LCD. Because during the 1080p era just mentioned, promotional materials for Sony's 1080p Bravia LCD TVs, claimed that those TVs would keep up with plasma TVs in EVERY area of performance, even saying that usable viewing angles would not be compromised compared to plasma. But anyone who then experienced Pioneer's Kuro Plasmas just laughed at Sony even trying to imply that ANY 1080p Bravia LCD could compare favorably with a 1080p Kuro! And that's why I now question how even a top notch Sony version of local dimming tech could possibly match a quality OLED which is capable of controlling EACH one of its 8.3 million pixels, so each of those millions of pixels is virtually its OWN dimming zone! And that's why so many of the tiniest stars in a star field, such as those in deep space scenes on the BD of the movie "Gravity", are nowhere to be seen, simply not showing up, as such a scene is displayed on even the best available local dimming LCDs. Yet those same tiny stars that are always missing on a local dimming LCD are clearly visible on ANY good OLED, due to that TV's capability of controlling each pixel, giving OLED a level of precision that even LCDs with 50 thousand zones would NOT have!
That's why ALL OLEDs have ZERO blooming, & can do ABSOLUTE BLACK, since every single OLED pixel can be fully shut off!
So it's likely that since LCD panels are FAR less COSTLY to produce than OLED panels are, a need to increase TV profit margins in an industry that's seeing profit margins rapidly shrinking, is THE main factor causing Sony to suddenly give such priority to LCD!
@hdtvtest. If you were choosing between an A80L and X95L on sale right now - which would you choose to best replicate creative intent of the HX310? For movies and streaming.
I'm glad I hope that also means their FALD screens get replaced by mini led or at least get more dimming zones. Sony's dimming zones with 1000 plus zones? Yes, please
The problem with dimming zones is that in game or pc mode the image quality drastically lowers, or you will get 200-300 ms added latency. Useless for gaming.
@@Dr.WhetFarts Yeah that is completely nonsense. Modern FALD TV's have anywhere from 20/10ms latency. They don't get 200/300ms latency for using the FALD. IDK what type of FALD screens you've used but the ones I own don't turn off FALD when you switch to PC or Gaming mode. It turns off other processing like motion smoothing etc which is why gaming mode always tends to look worse, because it's turning off all that image processing they normally use for movies and shows. But FALD isn't one of the things that is turned off.
Source: .. I owned and x900f, I own a "perfect for ps5" (according to Sony) x94j. and I own a samsung neo g8 gaming monitor with over a 1000 dimming zones and extremely low latency
Even for MiniLED Sony's amount of dimming zones is on the low end. I wish they just went all out instead of going with such low amounts.
@@3choblast3r4 Yeah, it is complete nonsense. Straight up lies. Even my 5 year old LED still has about maybe 20 ms or so latency even with HDR turned on. The image quality doesn't lower at all. In fact, it still looks absolutely fantastic.
But what about input lag? Are they finally able to achieve single digit input lag when using the best local dimming mode?
According to rtings, the G3 or C3 have the lowest input lag at half the A95L
@@RealGreyGhostBut it's irrelevant because you lose something for that lag and that lag is nothing compared to the lag of the game itself...
@@techsamurai11 Too many gamers dont understand this. They're fretting over differences of like 3-5ms on the displays, all while console games are frequently running 70ms+, sometimes even over 100ms of lag just inherent to the game. Sure, some more competitive games will get down to like 40-50ms, but again, the difference of another 3-5ms or so will not be perceptible, much less meaningful for anybody but the most hardcore of hardcore.
@@maynardburger yeah Digital Foundry was complaining about 160ms for some games ;-)
@@techsamurai11 When you compare everything side by side, you're not losing anything. Dolby Vision? Very few movies and games even ship with it on a disc or streaming so it doesnt matter. The lower the number, the better.
I want Mini LED for my monitors due to static imagery and lights on work, but would defiantly prefer for OLED TV's to stay around, for that lights off cinema experience.
Which one has better energy saving? Mini LED, QD or QLED
Hopefully this leads to improved mini led screen technology for phones, tablet, monitors, and tvs..
I'm hoping that Samsung puts 2 and 2 together and releases a MicroLED-QD. MicroLED tech isn't there to drive smaller displays just by itself, but I have to imaging that you could substantially reduce the cost by making a bigger, lower resolution, blue-monochromatic MicroLED panel and using that to drive some Quantum Dots.
This is like when Pioneer got out of the plasma game. Get em while you can
Yup, and just like pioneer they are digging their own grave
@@andyh4464Google Sony’s holdings einstein. The grand daddy of media
Pioneer and then Panasonic wrote the history of the best TVs in the world with their plasma TVs for about 10 years. Sony was a poor loser in that period.
AMAZING! im still happy with my S95B model from 1 year and half ago from samsung... i will see if sony improves even further this new tech after a few iterations, however i believe PHOLED will be the game changer in a few years time no burn in risk and more brigtness from oled.... so who knows.
My only issue with LED-LCD is that recently they have much greater issues of DSE compared to OLED since all brands purchase their panels from a few Chinese comoanies who offer lower quality control.
What about motion with all the motion interpolation settings off, will it still blur like normal lcd panel's horrible refresh rate? Also what about off angle viewing?
Dude look up the : Hisense U8K 75” …with some story display …that will answer all yr questions :)
That panel mini LED look Identical to QD-OLED. They cal that panel unicorn because d only one in North America.
@@birdtj82def not identical to a qdoled, if it were microLED then yes but nothing currently out looks identical to oled until microLED drops at the consumer level in smaller than wall sizes.
Lcd black levels are good enough, however I needed oled for the pixel response time and no dse or vignetting during sports
Response time on the new SONy LED seems slower than the X95L and OLED. I think this will be an issue. Similar issue that the QN90A exhibited. While bright with many LEDs, the QN90A had a very bad case of slow backlighting transitions between images.
So they are essentially giving up on the "best" option in order to offer a cheaper, larger, and more energy-efficient "really close 2nd best"? Seems reasonable.
@@paulc5389for the life of me I just can’t ever buy a Samsung product again if I can help it, had one of their TVs fall apart and glitch out on me, their totl phone at the time I had was an overheating lemon, meanwhile I bought a Sony LCD 15 years ago that’s still going strong in my buddy’s son’s bedroom. Have a heft of other Sony products from their headphones to game consoles & even a 80s stereo receiver, not one has gone defunct. I know it’s all anecdotal but still.
Likely we are being had by Sony here. I think they want to sell more LCDs and make it look like LCD is their big thing now to make that happen. Nex year or the year after they will be totally OLED again.
I was a judge at one of the recent tv shootouts (invited since I’m a video and post production professional).
In every case mini LED was noticeably inferior to OLED. Sony’s A95L was a good bit ahead to to their processing, but on the 8K sets, the Oled LG was far superior to Sony’s mini LED 8K, even with its processor advantage. Unless they can get black levels down, I fear this is a bad move as far as quality. And I’m no black level freak! I recently purchased Sony’s xw6000 projector, due to its brightness, since the JVC couldn’t go as big as I wanted to, despite its better blacks. (I’m projecting a diagonal of 200”-220”)
I now plan to get an a95L at some point, since it’s the last of the best of the OLED’s. But I’m a sucker for dead technology, since I recently purchased some JOLED panels for my editing suite for their color accuracy, despite the low brightness, which is fine for an edit suite.
Hey I read your comment and I’m curious as to why you believe the A95L is “the last of the best OLEDs” Thanks
@@xReyes94 Sony's processing is the best of the tv manufactures, regardless of whose panels they are using. Now that Sony has announced they are going away from OLED, their A95L seems to be the best OLED.
I'm not entirely convinced, but they have my attention! My current sony x90j looks great in terms of contrast and color but can't get very bright (on my ub820 I have to set the tv to basic luminance)
The X95L is the best tv I have ever owned, coming from a G1 and many other LEDs and OLEDs before that (still have a CX and a QD-OLED monitor). Can’t wait for the new miniled flagship
won't the G4 surpass the X95L?
Switched from LG oled last year to tcl c845 mini led and it turned out to be a great choice. The brightness is spectacular and especially sdr content is very pleasing. I don't think I will go back to oled any time soon. It's great for dark room home theater setups but that's not how I use my TV. For me personally mini led is the superior overall experience.
Once you buy real OLED/QD OLED TVs off Sony you can't go back to LCD/LED/Mini LED TVs it's hit or miss with LG OLED and Samsung QD OLED TVs.
I'd rather go for the mini LED as well but for another reason, My current old 2006 52 inch Sony Bravia LCD TV is used as a pc monitor, 18 years later still perfect picture.
No way these OLED's would last more than 3 years with the way I use them, They would get screen burn in guaranteed no matter how much I baby sit the tv.
@@paulc5389 not broken but I typically watch content in a well lit (but not super bright) room. I found SDR just underwhelming on OLED. Not necessarily terrible but just too dim for my liking under my lighting conditions. The c845 can do almost 1100 nits sustained 100% window in SDR at max setting (which is WAY too much), I have my SDR brightness set to 70/100 which should be about 800 nits and I find that very pleasing even though I'm aware it's certainly not a "correct" picture that a professional calibration expert would agree with. OLED can't get anywhere near that kind of SDR sustained brightness, not even remotely close. Another thing I found disappointing on my LG was its picture processing. I came from a 2018 flagship Sony lcd and the LG C2 was just noticeably worse at producing a pleasing SDR picture quality. HDR on OLED is absolutely fantastic, HDR movies and games alike, but anything SDR and especially 1080p content wasn't good enough for me. My next TV will probably be a Sony mini LED but I'm sticking with this TCL for two years at least.
TCL hahahaha
@@ElGrueso Yeah it's pretty funny isn't it. TCL makes a better product than LG for half the price. I initially bought it as a second TV thinking if it was bad, I'd just return it. I ended up getting rid of my LG instead. I'm probably never getting another OLED unless they triple the 100% window brightness at a minimal. 178 nits vs 900 nits on mini LED. That's hilarious indeed.
After using an OLED (I use the LG C1) as a computer monitor, you will never want to go back to LCD. Whenever I switch over to my old LCD panel the blacks just look mid grey now compared . . . .
Could you make some early measurements on 2024 lg and Samsung tv like last year?
The usual company vaporware to conceal a financial decision: not wanting to rely anymore on OLED panels made by Samsung or LG.
They don't buy Samsung or LG for OLED or QD OLED panels Sony buy off their sister companies LG and Samsung Display different companies altogether.
@RobertK1993 Yes I know. But those are still companies part of the Korean companies conglomerates. And OLED panels are Samsung's (QD-OLED) and LG's (WOLED) patents, while LCD panels are sold by many different companies (I dunno if Sony builds them itself).
I just bought an A95L over an X85L due to that “best” mini LED only coming in the (too big for me) 85 inches. I hope that means they’ll bring their best tech to smaller sizes…. Not that I’m going to buy a new TV for a looooong time.
EDIT: I meant the x95l, which only comes in 85 inches in the U.S.
X95L exists also in 55 and 65 sizes, just not sold in the US
That's false.
X95L is sold in the U.S.
X95L is the best Mini LED LCD TV of 2023. NOT the X85L.
@@PSYCHOV3N0M what's false ? Read my comment again carefully...
@@AndrasMihalyi it's 65", 75" and 85", mine's the 75" I think.
Hey Vince!!! Question please... So is this kind of like a successor to the original Backlight Master Drive on the Z9D, in which each individual LED was controlled as its own zone, but super-charged? I imagine if each driver controls 6 zones which contain 4 mini-LEDs per zone, we'll be seeing at least a double of total zones on this TV as compared to the mighty Z9D? The 65Z9D had approx 480 zones, and the 75 version had approx north of 820.
We could be looking at a 75 inch Z9M (with this technology) packing in 1,600 zones!!! I'm drooling already 🤩
But the main reason why we are switching from our x95 K in the living room to a new QD OLED TV is coming here is because the mini LED TVs are so huge and heavy so what they should also simultaneously do is find a way to reduce the size closer to OLED
Exactly those Sony LCD TVs weigh a ton. My A95K 65 weighs about 50 pounds I think.
Can't wait to see 2024 Mini LED TV's performance, I wish on the gaming side, these TVs line-up can perforce low input lag and remain burn in free long gaming sessions.
Been saying from the start, I enjoy OLED but I don't think it's a default technology for the main stream consumer - too many comprmises and too expensive to make. Mini-LED can display more HDR scenes with less issue (it's just not happened to be the scene most enthusiasts focused on), and the cheaper price often mean you get bigger screen for the same money.
Size is king for a TV. A larger display can make far more different than any deep black contrast that OLED offers
High five . Finally. A LOTTTTTTTTTT of ppl see OLED as Inferior: burn in = stress Inducing, Dim, low color volume, black crushing, glare, over priced……just bad bad bad bad bad bad . 😊 i cant stand OLED.
When it comes to watching movies bigger really does give better experience that's why I still watch movies on my larger LCD TV even though smaller OLED picture quality superior!
MiniLED is hugely increasing in cost as zone count increases so i'm not sure what you mean. OLED's now, at least in my country are about as dirt cheap as their LCD counter parts, only many times better. Unless you want to talk like 200 dollar budget jobs, but you cant really expect shit for that kind of money.
Other than potential burn in and not as bright. There are more advantages to OLED than LCD. Your comment is very foolish.
@@jaimem1788Okay and if you had a bigger OLED display you would be on that over the LCD.
Seeing as how i just got a Sony X95L last year, which I'm very happy with, i can wait a few years(or several)before buying a new model. Let me know Vincent when Sony has an 8K/60, 4000+ nits, glasses-free 3D display, and with deep black levels. X95R perhaps?
Do they even make 3d content anymore?
They should just do a double stack LCD like their reference monitor.
As someone who has a X95L, I am all for this decision. It has so many more benefits without any cons of OLED.
OLED con is limited brightness they almost same price high end Mini LED and have better picture quality burn in is overblown by ignorant people
@@RobertK1993 I disagree that burn-in is "overblown" - but sure, call me ignorant as a coping mechanism 🤣
Your OLED panel will degrade over time, no matter what. The burn in mitigation tech emploeyed just makes sure the panel equally burns in, so picture quality will suffer with time.
@@NicMediaDesignmy A95L has burn in already I’m getting the X95l next week facts they do burn in faster those QD oled and don’t rate the Samsung panels they’re using I was blown away by X95L today
@@RobertK1993wrong pal I own the A95L it as burn in