Which EU4 Nation Is THE BEST For TRADE?

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 27 июл 2024
  • Which EU4 Nation Is THE BEST For TRADE? or, what's the highest value you can get in your home trade node in EU4 in one hour? That's what we asked Absolute Habibi and Quarbit in the second duel of the first week in EU4 Para Bellum. Habibi went with The Ottomans and Quarbit chose France. Which one is better? Let's find out!
    Live every WEDNESDAY at 17:00 BST!
    Habibi: / absolutehabibi
    Quarbit: / @quarbit
    Timestamps:
    0:00 Intro
    0:42 Introducing Habibi
    02:17 Introducing Quarbit
    03:26 Challenge (Have The Highest Value In Your Home Trade Node)
    24:18 Results
    #eu4 #eu4parabellum
  • ИгрыИгры

Комментарии • 28

  • @snakeoil7089
    @snakeoil7089 27 дней назад +12

    14:24 Laith jumpscare

  • @sasi5841
    @sasi5841 27 дней назад +15

    Well of course ottomans are an un-orthodox pick. They are sunni after all.
    *_Ba dum tiss_*

  • @AcornFrog
    @AcornFrog 27 дней назад +90

    Does anyone else think this format would be better if the players had two or even three hours? EU4 campaigns take dozens and dozens of hours. Sometimes I wonder how much of a reflection of the players’ skill this actually is, just having an hour. I feel like giving more time would allow for more variety in strategy, and therefore more opportunity for novel and interesting plays.

    • @AcornFrog
      @AcornFrog 27 дней назад +1

      Six hour livestreams are very common. Lots of gaming tournaments run the entire day, so six hours is not outside the norm for livestreamed events. If total runtime is a concern, then they could find a format with fewer players, or one where multiple groups are playing at once, or an event with teams, etc. There’s lots of possibilities, and I think they should experiment beyond just one hour.

    • @aqvamarek5316
      @aqvamarek5316 27 дней назад +4

      They are aöready 1470 in 1hour, if you add +1 hour, you add +30 ingame years. So we are 1500/1530/1560, than this nations are all snowballing even harder.

    • @Thorum0
      @Thorum0 27 дней назад +12

      I prefer these abbreviations anyway, would be even better in 15-20 min probably. The 1 hour playtime timer seems perfect for stategy-building

    • @Mattis06
      @Mattis06 27 дней назад

      They probably don’t have enough time for it if the event sponsored they could experiment about the idea of longer challenges.

    • @TheSocialStreamers
      @TheSocialStreamers 25 дней назад +23

      3 three hour duels just isn't feasible to be honest. The last livestream was around 4 hours, triple that, trim some fat and you still have 10+ hours of a streamed tournament with live commentary and constant switching of POVs. We also intentionally give 30 minutes heads-up about the challenges as we don't want them to be a complete shock, but we also don't want extensive, year-on-year theory crafting.
      In addition to that, longer challenges just aren't as entertaining in my opinion - there's a compromise between competition and entertainment at play. We're not testing skill to the highest degree of accuracy, we're trying to put on a show that entertains as many people as possible. If we think about people who play EU4 more casually, for example, or someone who has never played, this format works much better.
      Thanks for then feedback though!

  • @Oiyss
    @Oiyss 27 дней назад +1

    02:30 fallen comrade"S"
    while That just one sliding picture

  • @derekskelton4187
    @derekskelton4187 21 день назад +1

    Would really enjoy something like this for CK3, Imperator, and Vic3

  • @villus9384
    @villus9384 27 дней назад

    Great game

  • @oKnuTo
    @oKnuTo 27 дней назад +3

    wouldnt it be better to play ottomans and move you main trade note to venice in an idea situation you have maxe cotnroll over all notes leading into venice but you dont care about venice itself. that way you dont fight the italien merchants and instead ally them.

  • @theminingsage
    @theminingsage 27 дней назад +1

    Litcherly my two favorite eu4 nerds

  • @user-zg4bk6rv1q
    @user-zg4bk6rv1q 26 дней назад

    My first thought was going for Ottomans since they have a lot of mana to dev diplo and have easy access many nodes to steer trade to them

  • @Klijavards
    @Klijavards 26 дней назад +5

    Really hard to understand what is being played for and what is the format. Would be nice if there would be some graphic in the introduction to tell the viewer whats going on (smth like football or hockey cup tournament graphics).

  • @azpont7275
    @azpont7275 27 дней назад +8

    Best trade nations are the ones who can do WCs super fast, so probably the Oirat or Ottomans. One can raze, the other doesn't need to core.

    • @roullemaskin
      @roullemaskin 10 дней назад +2

      if it was in x ammount of in game years i think you would be right, but becouse its 1 hour irl oirat is not a great pick imo

  • @seanstamler1035
    @seanstamler1035 21 день назад

    “69% war score against the Mamaluks. Very nice”. 😂😂😂

  • @olivermahon5618
    @olivermahon5618 26 дней назад

    I kind of wish rhat it was just one challenge for each pair but make it a little longer

  • @marcel582
    @marcel582 27 дней назад +1

    Can someone please explain that beef between Habibi and Quarbit to me? Can't find anything but I'm interested

  • @abhinavnair7471
    @abhinavnair7471 27 дней назад

    Quarbit took Negroponte, Crete, and Naxos in the war with Venice.

  • @mokrysama
    @mokrysama 17 дней назад

    why no ming?

  • @jevonjames3241
    @jevonjames3241 27 дней назад

    Less than a hair thats like 5% difference...

  • @Al-Basha_
    @Al-Basha_ 27 дней назад

    Absolute Ganker