Nice video . for outdoor walks, street and portraits of my little daughter, what do you recommend on Nikon Z f? tamron 28-75mm f2.8 di iii vxd g2 or Nikkor z 24-120 f4 s
Just bought the Tamron for doing some professional events and corporate photography and videography work. Your video was a big factor in going with this over the 24-70 f/2.8 S and so far, I'm absolutely glad I did. I do kinda mess the 24-27mm but other than that, the sharpness, light weight and performance at $999 is just unbeatable. Big thank you!
How is it going for you so far? I've been considering buying this over the Nikon for wedding photography (mostly because the Nikon is so expensive and I'm not one of those 'need to have the logo' people), but would be keen to hear how it is going for professional events, especially the video aspect.
@@AngryAnt0 Hey there! I'm still really pleased with how the Tamron 28-75mm f/2.8 G2 is performing overall. I must have gone through dozens of RUclips videos (including this one) researching this lens on both the Nikon Z mount and the Sony E mount versions. So far, I've shared the positive experiences that I've seen on other RUclipsrs videos. I've really liked it for video as well as the lighter weight makes it easier to use handheld. I don't think I would appreciate using the Nikon 24-70 f/2.8 S as it might be a bit too front heavy with the added weight. Video quality and auto-focus performance has been good as well. My only minor complaint about this lens has still been the lack of width at 28mm. Again, it's minor and while it would be nice to capture just a bit more of the surrounding environment, I still get by with 28mm. I think it comes down to whether you need that extra width from 24-27mm and whether you need sharper corners as I've read the Nikon is sharper on the edges but the Tamron holds up fine, especially if you stop down. For me personally, I can't see myself spending an extra $1,400 (or $1,000 if the NIkon is on sale). Now, if the Nikon also had an internal zoom and perhaps VR, maybe that would entice me a bit more, but neither have that. So far though, this lens gets the job done and haven't had any issues with it. As long as it performs and clients are happy with it, that's what matters to me.
@@lolfirepoisonftl Thanks for the reply, that's brilliant to hear it's been working out for you. I've been a strictly prime guy for weddings and shoots, but looking to branch back into zoom and always had a soft spot for Tamron, ever since I bought their 70-300 for some light sports on a DSLR many moons ago. I personally would be sticking to 35mm+ I think so the extra 4mm isn't too much of a hassle for me. I also tend to shoot a at a low F stop more often than not anyway so that's good to hear. Like you I've spent hours looking at videos etc, trying to see if it's worth buying the Nikon, the price difference is utterly silly isn't it? I don't believe the Nikon has VR either, so it's a tick in the box for Tamron as far as I'm concerned, like you said though internal zoom so it wouldn't upset the gimbal. I think you'd just pushed me towards the Tamron over the Nikon, so my bank manager would like to thank you!
@@AngryAnt0 You're welcome! I'm sure you'll enjoy using the Tamron if you do end up going with it.And totally agree on how silly the price difference is. I know the Nikon is a stellar lens but definitely not worth the extra $1,400 when you have this Tamron available. Better off taking the extra savings and upgrading other areas of your equipment that will make a bigger impact on improving your performance.
Hi Ralph. A quick correction on focusing distance myths. In this case, the nearest focusing distances. That distance isn't measured from the front of the lens to the subject, it's measured from the focal plane to the subject. The focal plane (front of the sensor) and that is marked on the top of your Nikon body by a thin short line on one side or the other of the (view)finder. Get a tape measure & prove it to yourself.
I often shoot for pre-wedding ( in studio only) and wedding day. Does the Tamron 28-75 G2 good for it? Sr for my English. Hope u rep me soon, sir. ( i use Z6 - FTZ1 - 24-70F4 - 50 1.4G and 70-200 vr2).
Great review!! Tamron close focus is a feature which they excell across alot of their lenses. I hace the 35mm 1.8 (no longer for sale) ans I can nearly touch what im shooting with the front of the lens. Can you let us know how the speed of focus is with Tamron 28-75?? I really love having 24mm on my standard zoom, but i think this lens will me over
Actually the minimum focus distance is measured from the focal plane, not the front lens. But the comparison still stands, just thought to mention, just to be accurate.
Please change your channel name to Monkey Out of a Hat 🐵😆 Quick note on measuring minimum focus distance, that’s measured from the sensor plane. Only mention that because it brings the Tamron even closer, which is really impressive for this price point.
Just grabbed the Tamron 28-75 G2 for ~740 EUR in a local promo, similar to current EU summer promo on the 28-75 G2 E-mount version (699 E). Just didn't make sense to throw 2k on the Nikon now. Plus I can adapt all of my 77mm filters... dooh.
@@petercintula6750 EXTRA20 discount code on checkout (might need to re-enter it if you change/update your cart) . Looks like it might be valid until 07/23 but not sure...
HaHa. I used to think the same. At f/2.8 the corners of any photo on any lens will be softer as they’re further away from the centre of the image, which has a shorter distance to the lens than the corners. causing the corners to sit beyond the focal plane of f2.8. I explain in other videos why I don’t do this test.
Купил никон z 28-75 2.8 . То же самое что и тамрон по цене но всё же родное решение всегда лучше. Автоматическое исправление искажений и виньетирования на высоте.
Can someone explain why Nikon 28-75 also is much cheaper than 24-70? Also I always thought, that 24-70f4 would be nice for not proffesional use eslecially because of weight, now this tamron looks very interesting as well :o
LOL, why would you compare a mid level Tamron to Nikon's flagship 24-70. People are obviously going to go for the cheaper option if they're not pros - which is the majority of the population. If anything, compare it to Nikons version of the 28-75
Which of these lenses would you buy and why?
Nice video .
for outdoor walks, street and portraits of my little daughter, what do you recommend on Nikon Z f?
tamron 28-75mm f2.8 di iii vxd g2
or
Nikkor z 24-120 f4 s
@@seba3233if it were me I’d go the f2.8 belonging to the Tamron in your choice criteria.
@@RalphMayhewPhotography thanks 🙏🏼
Hello from Buffalo, NY! Thank you for the in depth and informative review, I believe I'm about to cash out with the Tamron!!
Hello! Lovely to meet ya. Glad I could help with your decision making.
I've seen some lab test results in which the Tamron slightly outperformed the Nikon offering. I bought the Tamron, and I love it.
That doesn’t surprise me at all.
Just bought the Tamron for doing some professional events and corporate photography and videography work. Your video was a big factor in going with this over the 24-70 f/2.8 S and so far, I'm absolutely glad I did. I do kinda mess the 24-27mm but other than that, the sharpness, light weight and performance at $999 is just unbeatable. Big thank you!
Hey Charles. I’m happy for you mate. That’s great news!!
How is it going for you so far?
I've been considering buying this over the Nikon for wedding photography (mostly because the Nikon is so expensive and I'm not one of those 'need to have the logo' people), but would be keen to hear how it is going for professional events, especially the video aspect.
@@AngryAnt0 Hey there! I'm still really pleased with how the Tamron 28-75mm f/2.8 G2 is performing overall.
I must have gone through dozens of RUclips videos (including this one) researching this lens on both the Nikon Z mount and the Sony E mount versions. So far, I've shared the positive experiences that I've seen on other RUclipsrs videos.
I've really liked it for video as well as the lighter weight makes it easier to use handheld. I don't think I would appreciate using the Nikon 24-70 f/2.8 S as it might be a bit too front heavy with the added weight. Video quality and auto-focus performance has been good as well.
My only minor complaint about this lens has still been the lack of width at 28mm. Again, it's minor and while it would be nice to capture just a bit more of the surrounding environment, I still get by with 28mm.
I think it comes down to whether you need that extra width from 24-27mm and whether you need sharper corners as I've read the Nikon is sharper on the edges but the Tamron holds up fine, especially if you stop down.
For me personally, I can't see myself spending an extra $1,400 (or $1,000 if the NIkon is on sale). Now, if the Nikon also had an internal zoom and perhaps VR, maybe that would entice me a bit more, but neither have that.
So far though, this lens gets the job done and haven't had any issues with it. As long as it performs and clients are happy with it, that's what matters to me.
@@lolfirepoisonftl Thanks for the reply, that's brilliant to hear it's been working out for you. I've been a strictly prime guy for weddings and shoots, but looking to branch back into zoom and always had a soft spot for Tamron, ever since I bought their 70-300 for some light sports on a DSLR many moons ago. I personally would be sticking to 35mm+ I think so the extra 4mm isn't too much of a hassle for me.
I also tend to shoot a at a low F stop more often than not anyway so that's good to hear.
Like you I've spent hours looking at videos etc, trying to see if it's worth buying the Nikon, the price difference is utterly silly isn't it?
I don't believe the Nikon has VR either, so it's a tick in the box for Tamron as far as I'm concerned, like you said though internal zoom so it wouldn't upset the gimbal.
I think you'd just pushed me towards the Tamron over the Nikon, so my bank manager would like to thank you!
@@AngryAnt0 You're welcome! I'm sure you'll enjoy using the Tamron if you do end up going with it.And totally agree on how silly the price difference is. I know the Nikon is a stellar lens but definitely not worth the extra $1,400 when you have this Tamron available. Better off taking the extra savings and upgrading other areas of your equipment that will make a bigger impact on improving your performance.
I'm looking for two lens comparison so long and many thanks for sharing. It is very helpful to make decision to balance cost and quality. Great job!
Fantastic. Great to hear. Thanks.
Hi Ralph. A quick correction on focusing distance myths. In this case, the nearest focusing distances. That distance isn't measured from the front of the lens to the subject, it's measured from the focal plane to the subject. The focal plane (front of the sensor) and that is marked on the top of your Nikon body by a thin short line on one side or the other of the (view)finder. Get a tape measure & prove it to yourself.
Good call. Thanks mate 👍
Thanks mate, great review. Tamron seems like a good companion for my Z5
Absolutely. A great combo.
I often shoot for pre-wedding ( in studio only) and wedding day. Does the Tamron 28-75 G2 good for it? Sr for my English. Hope u rep me soon, sir. ( i use Z6 - FTZ1 - 24-70F4 - 50 1.4G and 70-200 vr2).
I can’t see why it wouldn’t be. I imagine you’d use flash so as long as you focus well should be fine 🤷🏼♂️
Great review!! Tamron close focus is a feature which they excell across alot of their lenses. I hace the 35mm 1.8 (no longer for sale) ans I can nearly touch what im shooting with the front of the lens.
Can you let us know how the speed of focus is with Tamron 28-75?? I really love having 24mm on my standard zoom, but i think this lens will me over
I did t notice any issues with speed of focus. It felt fast and natural.
Actually the minimum focus distance is measured from the focal plane, not the front lens.
But the comparison still stands, just thought to mention, just to be accurate.
Yeah true. Others mentioned it too 👌
Great review! The Tamron is a winner, no doubt! 👍👍
Thank you. I agree.
Great review. I'd go with the Tamron.
(that GD dust spot!) 😁
Hahaha I’ve finally cleaned the sensor!
I am looking to upgrade my tamron 17-50 2.8 on my z6ii think I might go with the tamron again! Can’t justify the Nikon price great video thanks!
The Tamron is a very solid offering. My pleasure.
Спасибо огромное, Ральф. Все думал, тамрон брать или никон который в два раза дороже. Буду покупать тамрон.
так рад, что смог помочь
Please change your channel name to Monkey Out of a Hat 🐵😆
Quick note on measuring minimum focus distance, that’s measured from the sensor plane. Only mention that because it brings the Tamron even closer, which is really impressive for this price point.
Bahahahha love it!!
Good call. Thanks legend.
Just grabbed the Tamron 28-75 G2 for ~740 EUR in a local promo, similar to current EU summer promo on the 28-75 G2 E-mount version (699 E). Just didn't make sense to throw 2k on the Nikon now. Plus I can adapt all of my 77mm filters... dooh.
Sounds wise to me. Well done 👍
Where did you find summer promo? I cannot find it anywhere in EU :/ Thanks for answer
@@petercintula6750 EXTRA20 discount code on checkout (might need to re-enter it if you change/update your cart) . Looks like it might be valid until 07/23 but not sure...
why didn't you show the tamron's corners at 2.8? Should be the most important thing. f8 or f16 is always sharp...
HaHa. I used to think the same. At f/2.8 the corners of any photo on any lens will be softer as they’re further away from the centre of the image, which has a shorter distance to the lens than the corners. causing the corners to sit beyond the focal plane of f2.8.
I explain in other videos why I don’t do this test.
24 and 28 is a big difference, 70 vs 75 is not... and the close focus distance is measured from the sensor, not then end of the lens.
The 24-37 difference depends on what you shoot and how you shoot it. And yep we’ve covered the focal length in other comments 👍
Купил никон z 28-75 2.8 . То же самое что и тамрон по цене но всё же родное решение всегда лучше. Автоматическое исправление искажений и виньетирования на высоте.
Nice 👌
Can someone explain why Nikon 28-75 also is much cheaper than 24-70?
Also I always thought, that 24-70f4 would be nice for not proffesional use eslecially because of weight, now this tamron looks very interesting as well :o
I have the f4 and it’s a great lens but the f2.8 seems to make a huge difference.
Because it's also tamron 28-75 (but 1st generation) with "nikon" nameplate on it
Thank you Ralph.
My pleasure.
I must say, I don't think I've ever licked my lenses before.
Really!! You gotta try it.
....i am from india ......i think Quality 97% to 98% same .....so tamron lens 98% also very good for photography ....save money... 🔍🔍
Yep 👍
LOL, why would you compare a mid level Tamron to Nikon's flagship 24-70. People are obviously going to go for the cheaper option if they're not pros - which is the majority of the population. If anything, compare it to Nikons version of the 28-75
You could help everyone out with an argument as to why to go for the Nikon 🤷🏼♂️
I have the Tamron 28-75 and was looking to see what the big difference is. If the Nikon was way better I’d buy it. (I’m not a pro).
28mm is not wide enough for me but may be great for others 🙂 Great channel you have here, such an underrated gem with tons of useful info! 👏
I hear what ur saying. That extra 4mm can be extremely handy. Thanks so much for saying that. I really appreciate it.
@@RalphMayhewPhotography Would you consider the Nikon 24-120/F4
I would, but I really, really like 2.8 or higher.
@@dannytsui1105 It depends on your needs. I have one and it's a perfect all-rounder.
You can pair it with excellent Nikkor 17-28mm f2.8. Also Tamron design.