I usually don't insert my opinions in these, as the point is for it to be fully A.I. generated. But I got to be honest Mankar takes this one with ease lmao.
If you decide not to kill Paarthurnax, the game will end with a conversation between you and him, where he explains that he will be teaching other dragons the Way of the Voice. Other than that, there are no major changes. If you don't complete the quest 'Paarthurnax', you still have the Greybeards' favor, but can't rebuild the Blades or continue with their missions. You can also choose to kill Astrid in the abandoned house when you first meet her instead of killing any of the victims. If you do that, the quest 'With Friends Like These...' will fail, and you will start 'Destroy the Dark Brotherhood!' where you have to tell the Penitus Oculatus about what you did, and kill the remaining members in the Sanctuary.(Note: If you decide to kill Astrid, you should consider getting some of the best armor and weapons you can get in your stage of the game. She has much health and can also deal a lot of damage)
I agree with Mankar Camoran. Both games are good, but Oblivion has a large amount of content that is completely unique and fun to replay, while Skyrim's missions can be a bit repetitive at times
I'm with Cameron on this one, Skyrim does many things better than Oblivion like combat, graphics, soundtrack, world design & modding but let's be real Skyrim can't hold a candle to Oblivion when it comes to lore, depth of mechanics, role-playing, factions, quests, DLC you name it Oblivion clears Skyrim 😂
Funny how Mankar is trying to use the same arguments on Miraak Dagoth Ur used on him. Make up your mind Mankar. Having played both games, while i like Oblivion's story it's much more generic fantasy. Skyrim at least has it's own unique identity instead of being just a bag of fantasy tropes. Besides Oblivion's leveling system makes leveling completely pointless. Witcher 3 blows them all out of the water easily tho. It has everything. Stunning graphics, relatable characters, compelling villains, interesting story. And while you are locked into playing Geralt, because the devs didn't have to account for a billion different characters players may create you can really roleplay as Geralt the witcher a lot more then you usually can.
![Felix "Unfair" | [Stray Kids : SKZ-PLAYER]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/Oswujxm2Ag0/mqdefault.jpg)
I usually don't insert my opinions in these, as the point is for it to be fully A.I. generated. But I got to be honest Mankar takes this one with ease lmao.
He fought valiantly against fate, but i am stronger here
Oblivion has some really sweet quests. It's like fallout new Vegas of elder scrolls.
I'm sorry - since when did Skyrim have multiple endings!?
I may prefer Skyrim over Oblivion (barely), but yeah, multiple endings are a flat-out lie on Miraak's part.
the closest thing I can gather is what you decise to do with party snacks
@Michael Cutler Will you get the feed the party snacks to Alduin ending? Or keep them for yourself ending?
If you decide not to kill Paarthurnax, the game will end with a conversation between you and him, where he explains that he will be teaching other dragons the Way of the Voice. Other than that, there are no major changes. If you don't complete the quest 'Paarthurnax', you still have the Greybeards' favor, but can't rebuild the Blades or continue with their missions.
You can also choose to kill Astrid in the abandoned house when you first meet her instead of killing any of the victims. If you do that, the quest 'With Friends Like These...' will fail, and you will start 'Destroy the Dark Brotherhood!' where you have to tell the Penitus Oculatus about what you did, and kill the remaining members in the Sanctuary.(Note: If you decide to kill Astrid, you should consider getting some of the best armor and weapons you can get in your stage of the game. She has much health and can also deal a lot of damage)
I actually think Mankar's wild disembodied ramblings while you're in his paradise are really well done, better than Dagoth Ur's imo.
Miraak is just upset because he got destroyed by Dagoth Ur in the last debate
I agree with Mankar Camoran. Both games are good, but Oblivion has a large amount of content that is completely unique and fun to replay, while Skyrim's missions can be a bit repetitive at times
I'm with Cameron on this one, Skyrim does many things better than Oblivion like combat, graphics, soundtrack, world design & modding but let's be real Skyrim can't hold a candle to Oblivion when it comes to lore, depth of mechanics, role-playing, factions, quests, DLC you name it Oblivion clears Skyrim 😂
Oblivion really knew how to use its bugs and wierd accidental features to its advantage with Shivering Isles
You that somethbing? On the other hand it is something.
I love listening to george clooney talk about my favorite video game
Funny how Mankar is trying to use the same arguments on Miraak Dagoth Ur used on him. Make up your mind Mankar.
Having played both games, while i like Oblivion's story it's much more generic fantasy. Skyrim at least has it's own unique identity instead of being just a bag of fantasy tropes. Besides Oblivion's leveling system makes leveling completely pointless.
Witcher 3 blows them all out of the water easily tho. It has everything. Stunning graphics, relatable characters, compelling villains, interesting story. And while you are locked into playing Geralt, because the devs didn't have to account for a billion different characters players may create you can really roleplay as Geralt the witcher a lot more then you usually can.
No u