Why Did This Boeing 747 Bursts Into FLAMES Over the OCEAN?! | Asiana Flight 991

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 29 июл 2023
  • Grab Atlas VPN for just $1.83/mo + 3 months extra before the SUMMER DEAL expires: get.atlasvpn.com/CuriousPilot
    This Asiana airlines Boeing 747 was on route to shanghai, unbeknown to the crew a fire had broken out in the cargo bay and within minutes had grown to engulf the aircraft. What you are about to see is what happened to this flight and how it was able to occur, to see what happens in this air crash investigation, keep watching!
    Final Report: skybrary.aero/sites/default/f...
    ** Asiana Airlines Boeing 747-400 Passenger livery used, I was unable to find a freighter version and would not have had sufficient time to make one before the video needed to be out! The Livery would be the same just with the passenger windows covered up .
    Asiana Airlines Livery by baik1120:
    forums.x-plane.org/index.php?...
    #aircrashinvestigation
  • КиноКино

Комментарии • 123

  • @CuriousPilot90
    @CuriousPilot90  10 месяцев назад +11

    Grab Atlas VPN for just $1.83/mo + 3 months extra before the SUMMER DEAL expires: get.atlasvpn.com/CuriousPilot
    *** Asiana Airlines Passenger livery was used as freighter variant was unavailable.

  • @joecrammond6221
    @joecrammond6221 10 месяцев назад +57

    watching this video reminds me of UPS 6, the crew followed all the checklists for a cargo fire but couldn't reach safety in time

    • @CuriousPilot90
      @CuriousPilot90  10 месяцев назад +13

      True, another flight carrying many batteries (Not that I am blaming the batteries because it was not proven, but a coincidence at the very least.)

    • @BobbyGeneric145
      @BobbyGeneric145 10 месяцев назад +8

      Ups now has these crazy devices that form a bubble around the instrument panel so the crew can see the instruments.

    • @joecrammond6221
      @joecrammond6221 10 месяцев назад +4

      was nice to hear UPS going above and beyond in order to try and protect their pilots, by all accounts being unable to see their instruments made any chance of a safe landing impossible, relay planes passing on information which was slightly outdated, the final factor was the first officer being told to turn to 095 but in the smoke turned it to 195

    • @yookalaylee2289
      @yookalaylee2289 10 месяцев назад +1

      Didn’t that flight crew turn around to their origin which was further than their destination. Because they thought landing with known procedures was the best option. Very hard to see the complete logic of that choice that doomed them.

    • @jirehla-ab1671
      @jirehla-ab1671 10 месяцев назад

      ​@@CuriousPilot90would you also argue that there was poor quality control in the production of the batteries?

  • @richardmcleod1930
    @richardmcleod1930 10 месяцев назад +16

    A very experienced flight crew for Asiana Airlines didn't seem to make much of a difference in the flight of this airplane. A truly sad situation for all those involved with this flight.
    May the Pilots Rest In Peace.

  • @ChabbaD90
    @ChabbaD90 10 месяцев назад +36

    I hadn’t heard of this one before-absolutely tragic for the crew but as always, you described the situation very well. Thanks again for another excellent video :-)

    • @CuriousPilot90
      @CuriousPilot90  10 месяцев назад +6

      Thank you, this was in interesting one to research and make. Interesting but tragic.

  • @rilmar2137
    @rilmar2137 10 месяцев назад +11

    Major resemblence of UPS flight 6

    • @josh2961
      @josh2961 10 месяцев назад +2

      I was just writing this too! I knew of UPS flight 6 but not this one!

  • @tallymedic
    @tallymedic 10 месяцев назад +15

    RIP pilots, very sad incident. Congrats on the sponsors, you deserve it!

  • @SuperchargedSupercharged
    @SuperchargedSupercharged 10 месяцев назад +10

    Great video. Thank you for not trying to shorten it to 10 minutes.

  • @jamiecheslo
    @jamiecheslo 10 месяцев назад +15

    I was not familiar with this tragic incident at all. Thanks so much for another thorough and well-documented presentation! Always look forward to your videos. Cheers from Canada!

  • @segfault-berlin
    @segfault-berlin 10 месяцев назад +8

    I can't think of a more lonely and tragic place to die than on the flight deck of a cargo aircraft.

  • @ZombieSazza
    @ZombieSazza 10 месяцев назад +15

    Amazing quality video, your hard work shines through in your video. Absolutely devastating fire, the pilots tried their absolute best, I cannot imagine their terror during their last moments knowing there’s nothing that could be done.

    • @CuriousPilot90
      @CuriousPilot90  10 месяцев назад +5

      Thank you! It was really chilling to script and record those last moments. A very sad and tragic moment.

  • @GuyNamedSean
    @GuyNamedSean 10 месяцев назад +3

    I'm glad I saw the community post. I didn't get notified for this one.

  • @consumedbywanderlust9095
    @consumedbywanderlust9095 10 месяцев назад +4

    Very good videos brother. Short and informative. Keep it up. I watched all your videos

  • @nigelbond4056
    @nigelbond4056 10 месяцев назад +11

    Great video, excellent explanation and fantastic narration. 👌

  • @curbyourshi1056
    @curbyourshi1056 10 месяцев назад +6

    RIP Good Pilots.

  • @Flies2FLL
    @Flies2FLL 10 месяцев назад +6

    Man, main deck fire, me: Pull the speed brake, put the fucking gear down, and MMO descent, maybe a little more! I'm going to get as close to the ground as soon as possible and if I even have to push the speed of sound to get there, I'm getting there! I don't care about the gear doors, and I'll put out the flaps just above flap speeds if I have to and even do a full slip to get this airplane down NOW!
    Folks, as a 30 year airline pilot and former 747 Captain, a fire on board is the one thing that scares me the most. You need to be on the ground YESTERDAY if you want to preserve your own life. And YES I would do all the above, I don't care about the pile of aluminum I'm in, I care about my own ass!

  • @nicholasdean3869
    @nicholasdean3869 10 месяцев назад +10

    Lithium batteries create their own oxygen when burned so no amount of oxygen deprivation would put the fire out if indeed it was the lithium batteries that caught fire

    • @darrenbathurst
      @darrenbathurst 10 месяцев назад +2

      But you can’t mention that too loud……EV’s are going up everywhere!

    • @nicholasdean3869
      @nicholasdean3869 10 месяцев назад

      It’s happened multiple times on aircraft too. UPS lost one as well to a lithium battery fire

    • @MST545
      @MST545 10 месяцев назад

      @@nicholasdean3869 I know these guys haven't covered it but I think it was either Air Disasters or Green Dot Aviation, the tragedy of UPS Flight 6
      EDIT: It was Mayday Air Disasters and Mentour Pilot that covered the disaster. I think there's also a record of the CVR from that flight online and it's just downright heartbreaking :(

  • @haphap1000
    @haphap1000 10 месяцев назад +7

    Top notch videos bro. Your research and details are best out there. Thank you for your efforts!!

    • @CuriousPilot90
      @CuriousPilot90  10 месяцев назад +4

      Thank you, I really appreciate the comment.

  • @mikemoreno4469
    @mikemoreno4469 10 месяцев назад +19

    Fantastic video. If the fire was definitely caused by lithium batteries, no amount of fire suppression would have worked. The only solution is to jettison the cargo, which they were unable to do. So, from the moment the fire started they were doomed!

    • @bobwilson758
      @bobwilson758 10 месяцев назад +2

      Sad but true !

    • @teslacoiler
      @teslacoiler 10 месяцев назад +2

      Or point the plane on a safe direction and jump with a parachute (which is not possible in these planes).
      BTW, today we are in the middle of a similar accident involving a cargo ship and electric cars..... luckily the crew of a ship can escape trough life boats (but the ship is probably doomed)

    • @gnarthdarkanen7464
      @gnarthdarkanen7464 10 месяцев назад +1

      Lithium Ion batteries are a damnably dubious lot... I don't know if there's any good to come of a new standard of manufacture or what, but it seems like it takes almost nothing to cause just enough "warp" to send them into thermal runaway...
      Consider all the hoverboards and E-bikes going "pffft" recently... and there's the e-cigs and vaping mod's blowing people's faces off...
      ALL the technologies are pretty great when they work... but damn... one little thing just so slightly off and it's not even a funny inconvenience you can laugh off after the smoke clears and you get over the toy spouting a few sparks or turning into a "burnt-out husk of its former self" or something like ordinary batteries when they pop or fail... People are getting killed by stupid little things. ;o)

    • @teslacoiler
      @teslacoiler 10 месяцев назад +1

      @@gnarthdarkanen7464 Li-Fe-Po (usually called LFP) batteries seems a better choice because are very unlikely to self ignite due to a thermal runaway (are still extremely flammable BTW but at least they shouldn't start the fire by themselves) and are also cheaper and much more durable than Li-Ion.... but unfortunately there are also some drawbacks.....
      .... LFP are less energy dense than Li-Ion and doesn't like fast charges and discharges, which means that the range will be lower and the charge will be slower....
      LFP might be a good choice for an hybrid veicle or for very small city 4 wheels vehicles (not considered cars) or for insanely bulk and heavy cars only (where the range is limited to the range of the battery and the charging stops are not an option).

    • @gnarthdarkanen7464
      @gnarthdarkanen7464 10 месяцев назад

      @@teslacoiler Maybe (with a little luck) LFP's will be a useful "bridge-gap" between the tech thus far, and the manufacturing standard or materials needed for Li-Ion based tech to really take off.
      It's worth admitting that I suspect at least some level of the "cheap-*ss knock-offs" being more responsible for the treacherous lemons among Li-Ion batteries. We simply can't allow the factories to "slouch" on productions for the higher production outputs or lowering costs. It's going to have to cost what it costs at some level.
      AND I suspect as much because I've seen a rampant "explosion" in popularity for knock-off and "unbranded" batteries among the 18650's that I get for tactical flashlights, stunners, and a few other accessories I have on hand.
      In yesteryear's tech', the "tops" were alkaline batteries, but the "unbranded" and "knock-off" communities only got so far against the likes of Duracell and Energizer, so they came out with "Ultra Duty" but those were "alkalide" or "alkaloid" batteries and offered less voltage at best and less than half the lifespan even at the lower ratings. They were only marginally cheaper and terrible...
      SO this is the results of that same kind of trend, only on Li-Ion, because I'm not particularly gentle... especially with a device claiming "tactical"... It's for field use and that's tough out here in the mountains... BUT I haven't had trouble yet {knocks wood furiously} At least, nothing fire-worthy. I've bought more than the usual "lemon factor" in fresh-made DEAD ones, though. ;o)

  • @josh2961
    @josh2961 10 месяцев назад +12

    Really amazing job on this one! You said you put in the most time and it shows! I have seen other people say that this is like UPS flight 6 and I was thinking the same thing but this is not known as much. A fascinating video and chilling at times. But thank you for all the research and presentation.

    • @CuriousPilot90
      @CuriousPilot90  10 месяцев назад +3

      I appreciate that Josh, thank you.

  • @Thewinteryeepfr
    @Thewinteryeepfr 10 месяцев назад +5

    hii

  • @scaramonga
    @scaramonga 10 месяцев назад +6

    Lithium batteries are 'volatile' under normal circumstances. These things can just explode for no reason whatsoever, I know, as I use them in my vape device, and one 18650 decided to do just that one day, for no reason at all. This thing vented with furious aplomb, and shot across my apartment in a ball of fire, taking at least 5 mins to settle from its mighty discharge. (one battery not getting charged, nor doing anything). It just came to life, and decided to blow. Now, we all know the conditions of any pressurised aircraft, the contractions of such an environment, which can add/subtract many inches to heavy metal under normal conditions. Lithium cells, in phones, laptops etc, all go through this when we fly, and will always pose a threat, hence they are no longer allowed in the cargo hold, but can just as easily decide to explode when the mood takes them ;) They are a necessity in today's world, but one that should be replaced ASAP, as there is now an alarming trend of these things taking on a life of their own, not just in the air, but in other cases, such as the house which burnt down 2 weeks ago (killing whole family), because the lithium battery on an electric 'scooter', parked in the family hall, decided to just vent. Can you really trust them???
    Do not underestimate the ferocity of which these things (regardless of size and capacity) can act. They are lethal, and in the right environment, will prove that 10 fold.
    Unfortunately, there was not a lot this crew could do about it, as they were doomed from the start. God bless them, and RIP.

  • @alec_s18
    @alec_s18 10 месяцев назад +12

    Thanks for covering this! Seems like UPS 6 got extensive coverage but I’ve never heard of this crash

    • @josh2961
      @josh2961 10 месяцев назад +5

      It’s amazing how similar they are but you are right, I hadn’t heard of this one either! Crazy that it could happen many times before change was implemented.

    • @crypton7572
      @crypton7572 10 месяцев назад +1

      interesting how everyone is aware of ups 6 but not this crash even if both involve the same type of plane and same causes
      there were only 4 recorded fatal plane crashes during the 2010s, this one, ups one which both crashed due to lithium ion battery fire, other than that there was national airlines 102, which was a 747 which stalled after take off due to load shift( (its a well known crash because someone had recorded the plane taking off and stalling) and turkish/act airlines 1906 which crashed on go around due to basic pilot error

  • @aldenconsolver3428
    @aldenconsolver3428 10 месяцев назад +4

    Interesting and educational. Thank you

  • @Curious-Minds
    @Curious-Minds 10 месяцев назад +7

    Well done on getting sponsorship.
    Great videos.

  • @Konigwilson123
    @Konigwilson123 10 месяцев назад +7

    Wow already getting sponsors

  • @mikekeenan8450
    @mikekeenan8450 10 месяцев назад +4

    Tragic, but one positive thing stands out for me - the Chinese ATC working seamlessly with the KAL crew, with whom they doubtless would have disagreements if you sat them down to talk politics, doing their darnedest to try to save those guys.

  • @graeggede
    @graeggede 10 месяцев назад +6

    This is similar kinda to Swiss 111

    • @Eruma_27
      @Eruma_27 2 месяца назад

      More like UPS flight 6 tbh

  • @islandzuk8531
    @islandzuk8531 10 месяцев назад +5

    I would think cargo planes would have anti fire systems.

    • @JasonTan-9757
      @JasonTan-9757 7 месяцев назад

      Unfortunately, Lithium batteries fire consume most of the anti-fire system thrown at it. Like CO2 and water (H2O), Lithium batteries fire will take the O - oxygen for burning, making the fire even stronger. I am not sure what can stop a lithium batteries fire. Perhaps the only anti lithium fire solution is to starve it of Oxygen. I think there are some modern cargo systems that can compartmentize the cargo area into different zones and if there is fire in one area, it can shut down the area and close off the air supply into that area.

  • @desdicadoric
    @desdicadoric 5 месяцев назад +3

    RIP gentlemen. Sometimes there’s nothing you can do

  • @calikid3336
    @calikid3336 10 месяцев назад

    Thankfully there were no passengers on board; just 2 crew members! Good video.

  • @user-ns5fv9wu9g
    @user-ns5fv9wu9g 10 месяцев назад +3

    As a korean this accident was a controversial event due to links to the insurance fraud but thank fully it was denied and gave justice to the families of the. Pilots

    • @josephphillips9243
      @josephphillips9243 10 месяцев назад +2

      What was the fraud you mentioned?

    • @user-ns5fv9wu9g
      @user-ns5fv9wu9g 10 месяцев назад

      @@josephphillips9243 life insurance of the pilot

  • @ImperrfectStranger
    @ImperrfectStranger 10 месяцев назад +1

    The extinguishing system for the main deck cargo relies on the cabin being automatically depressurised to 25,000' when the cargo fire button is pressed. A reduction in airconditioning pack output and, critically, the pressurisation outflow valves are modulated to facilitate this. Unfortunately, you can't have a negative differential pressure. If they descended to 10,000', the cabin pressure would have to go with it. Checklist notwithstanding, the pilot's early request to descend doesn't make sense to someone who understands the aircraft systems properly. Training issue again?

  • @ronduncan9527
    @ronduncan9527 6 месяцев назад +2

    Sounds just like UPS6!

  • @andrewvogt3001
    @andrewvogt3001 10 месяцев назад

    Curious pilot please look into flight 232. Its pretty remarkable story.

  • @MiturBinEsderty
    @MiturBinEsderty 9 месяцев назад +1

    They need a fire watch on board and equatorial stop fires. Or stop lithium batteries on flights

  • @trinity72gp
    @trinity72gp 10 месяцев назад +1

    Such a sad story. They never had a chance 😢😑

  • @phugoid
    @phugoid 10 месяцев назад +5

    A cargo aircraft with those many windows? ;)

    • @CuriousPilot90
      @CuriousPilot90  10 месяцев назад +10

      I know! 😬😬 I forgot to add the note to the captions on screen, but as you can tell I couldn’t get the freighter livery only the passenger variant! I did add a note to the description but I doubt anyone reads that. 😁😁

    • @phugoid
      @phugoid 10 месяцев назад +4

      @@CuriousPilot90 No worries, mate. Excellent video

    • @freddiecunningham2860
      @freddiecunningham2860 10 месяцев назад

      Not if it was converted right?

  • @MsDenver2
    @MsDenver2 10 месяцев назад +1

    The obvious answer is don’t carry such cargo on a aircraft , send it by sea instead , why hadn’t they learned from past incidents with that dangerous cargo. If I was flight crew I would not allow that cargo on my flight.

  • @Cons_studios
    @Cons_studios 5 месяцев назад +1

    Dam didn’t know a plane crash happened like 2 weeks prior to you know

  • @Splicer
    @Splicer 10 месяцев назад +4

    👍🏼👍🏼👍🏼👍🏼

  • @laylaplaysgames6980
    @laylaplaysgames6980 7 месяцев назад +1

    Just curious, couldn’t they have done an emergency water landing?

  • @davesmith5656
    @davesmith5656 10 месяцев назад

    It is fairly well-known and understood that whitewash, composed principally of lime and water, is not a flammable liquid - although it is a bit viscous. What is not so clearly understood, is that while not a source of hazard itself, it tends to obfuscate other sources of hazard, to the point where these are indiscernible. If for example, substantial quantities of whitewash were in the cargo hold of an airplane on fire due to lithium-ion battery combustion, that whitewash might make it difficult to ascribe the source of the fire to the lithium-ion batteries.

  • @Codehead3
    @Codehead3 10 месяцев назад

    1) Why don’t they use a halogen fire suppression system like what is used on ships? 2) Wouldn’t it have been preferable to ditch in the ocean rather than burn up? The cargo was a total loss anyway.

  • @3316xtendedmedia
    @3316xtendedmedia 10 месяцев назад +2

    To much info in a situation, where they where on heavy stress.Reading a guiding manual as thick as a book, is very disturbing.

  • @davesmith5656
    @davesmith5656 10 месяцев назад

    I have a suggestion: when lithium-ion batteries are transported, especially by air, place them in a disposable cargo container. When they catch fire, ditch them, and give fish one more reason to despise humans. (One day maybe, airplanes will have a detachable passenger compartment with parachutes attached. Just blow the cargo, wings, and tail off, and fly the parachutes.)

  • @richardmcleod1930
    @richardmcleod1930 10 месяцев назад +1

    A shame the World is now so dependent on Lithium Batteries which are extremely dangerous in practically all situations.

  • @SomerandompersonGD
    @SomerandompersonGD 7 месяцев назад +1

    So THATS what happened to my package when I was in vacation.

  • @The_luckynumberis7
    @The_luckynumberis7 8 месяцев назад

    I was 1 year old when that happened

  • @stevegibb6421
    @stevegibb6421 10 месяцев назад +2

    In the near future we are going to see an airliner loss with hundreds on board when Lithium batteries ignite in the baggage compartment. Passengers are told not to put Lithium batteries in checked baggage but never over estimate the average person to F….. it up. Airline rules and procedures are way too vague on the very dangerous possibility

  • @olef.
    @olef. 10 месяцев назад +1

    Fire extinguisher and other stuff has absolutely NO EFFECT on thermal runaway LIPO batteries..
    so I don´t queite get it here..??

  • @sindeecharlton8857
    @sindeecharlton8857 10 месяцев назад +1

    Yumm wonder what was in cargo hold of M-370. Could This be the untold story of M-370?

    • @Eruma_27
      @Eruma_27 2 месяца назад +1

      No cuz a plane on fire won’t stay in the air for 6 hours after catching fire

  • @Dovietail
    @Dovietail 3 месяца назад

    They should have ditched in the sea earlier, when they knew they were beginning to lose navigation control, maybe?

  • @skyhigh1154
    @skyhigh1154 7 месяцев назад

    -26C ??? Really😮

  • @blackhawkorg
    @blackhawkorg 10 месяцев назад +4

    Their only hope of survival with that cargo was to descend immediately to 300 feet and prepare to ditch before critical systems were lost.
    At least they would've had a chance. You can't fight a lithium fire...

    • @nicolainielsen7700
      @nicolainielsen7700 10 месяцев назад

      In a pressure vessel? Absolutely. Fire needs oxygen. If you are able to remove the oxygen, then there's no fire....

  • @JWUniverse
    @JWUniverse 10 месяцев назад +1

    At the start of the video, I said It must have been Lithium Batteries that caused this… Ans sure enough it was… Why are these allowed to Fly on planes. They should have been banned after the last crashes! RIP to the crew!

  • @30yearsfuelingbigjets
    @30yearsfuelingbigjets 3 месяца назад

    if you know your on fire...#1...why didnt the copilot go try and put out the fire with a fire extinguisher? 2nd... knowing your on fire, why not pancake into the ocean...at least you have a chance, opposed to the aircraft burning up high in the sky...where death is certain!

  • @jamest2401
    @jamest2401 10 месяцев назад +1

    This business about which switches were in what position, or which checklist they used, or even which simulator they trained in; are all, in this case, completely irrelevant. There was no procedural order, or anything else, that was going to stop that fire from consuming the aircraft. The minute that fire started, their fates were sealed. The only thing that could have remedied the situation, would have been some kind of sprinkler fire suppression system.

  • @stavrosk.2868
    @stavrosk.2868 10 месяцев назад

    Why are these highly flammable goods stored in airplanes in the first place?

  • @peribe438
    @peribe438 10 месяцев назад

    Way too much details on pilots background and hours etc etc. Skip the details, not relevant

  • @RaymondHaley-lv2mo
    @RaymondHaley-lv2mo 13 дней назад

    A cargo/passenger jet how ridiculous, the passengers were just guinea pigs,on this flight.

  • @DBEdwards
    @DBEdwards 5 месяцев назад

    Lithium batteries. A recipe for self destruction

  • @jonathanchow9036
    @jonathanchow9036 10 месяцев назад

    Which is why ICAO modify safety guidelines after this tragic crash👉stating dangerous goods are allowed on freighter aircrafts, must travel by ship

  • @user-dk1zh7bd3y
    @user-dk1zh7bd3y 10 месяцев назад +1

    I allso think battery’s and flammable liquids and pair should be banned

  • @user-dk1zh7bd3y
    @user-dk1zh7bd3y 10 месяцев назад +1

    Hi why wasn’t the cargo checked I bleave who ever loaded the 747 991 should be held responsible for the pilots lifes that was lost because of Mel practice negligence thy should be put before the courts and be done for man slaughter and sentenced to ps god bless the pilots and their families

    • @CuriousPilot90
      @CuriousPilot90  10 месяцев назад +4

      All the cargo was loaded in accordance with the procedures Asiana Airlines required, and the source of the fire could not be determined, there wasn't any malpractice discovered or suspected. It did however, add to the list of similar incidents to allow for more safety measures to be implemented so future incidents could be avoided.

  • @notvalidcharacters
    @notvalidcharacters 10 месяцев назад

    Sooooo.... the plane was scheduled to go at 04h11, its crew showed up an hour before, inspected the plane at 02h15 an hour before they got there, and departed at 03h01, an hour and ten minutes early and also before they got there?
    It was probably all that time machine stretching.

  • @daniellantos26
    @daniellantos26 10 месяцев назад +1

    I’d rather have an event like this with a Tesla owner.

  • @BobbyGeneric145
    @BobbyGeneric145 10 месяцев назад +3

    Its pronounced "A-zhee-ah-nuhh"

    • @giggiddy
      @giggiddy 10 месяцев назад +7

      Does it really matter?

    • @mattteee2973
      @mattteee2973 10 месяцев назад

      @@giggiddy it is very jarring to hear tbh. Enough to make me scroll down to see if anyone could confirm that this airline is named in relation to Asia, rather than something else entirely.
      Narrator sounds like they grew up in the UK, where we definitely learned about continents in geography lessons.

    • @CuriousPilot90
      @CuriousPilot90  10 месяцев назад +8

      I double checked this before making the video just to make sure. I watched an official Asiana Airlines advert and the person narrating pronounced it how I did.

    • @billmcg1676
      @billmcg1676 10 месяцев назад +4

      @@CuriousPilot90 Wow.- you were thorough with the double-check! Nicely done. Keep rolling - great video, informative and great narration!

    • @josh2961
      @josh2961 10 месяцев назад +2

      @@billmcg1676agreed!

  • @EstorilEm
    @EstorilEm 10 месяцев назад +1

    Lol it’s definitely “As-iana” Airlines not “Osh-iana” 🙈😂

  • @user-ek4zy9ly1y
    @user-ek4zy9ly1y 10 месяцев назад +1

    It's supposed to be:
    "A fire had BROKEN out"
    NOT: "a fire had BROKE out" . . . that's a pitiful mistake.
    Let's not dumb things down any more than they have been despite the degraded educational system.
    You are not pronouncing many of the G's at the ends of words as well.
    For example you'll say LANDIN' not LANDING
    Of course that could be a British thing like the snooker commentators saying, "balls carreering intead of careening" and "cannon" instead of carom or speaking of the commenTRY box instead of the commentARY box. They all pronounce commentary like Coventry is pronounced. Really sloppy stuff.
    You said they "made contact with Seol center . . .
    and WAS instructed to climb.
    It is supposed to be WERE INSTRUCTED to climb, NOT WAS INSTRUCTED.
    I enjoy your presentations and think they are very well done so I hope you appreciate the fact that correcting your grammatical and punctuation mistakes is important to your work.
    More:
    You said, "The flight continued as NORMAL
    is supposed to be: "the flight continued as normally"
    Continued is a verb and adverbs like normally have an LY at the end.
    You said: "PREVENTIN any further fire destruction . . . instead of PREVENTING
    People now say: drive safe instead of safely, I'm taking you serious instead of seriously.
    It's sad, this dumbing down.

  • @danko6582
    @danko6582 10 месяцев назад

    "Arseyerarnah" 😂 That's like saying "Blittish Airway".

  • @kennethforrest3457
    @kennethforrest3457 10 месяцев назад

    Far to many adverts

  • @kennethforrest3457
    @kennethforrest3457 10 месяцев назад

    Far to many adverts
    Need to unsubscribe