Trivia: Glenn Howerton (Dennis) was actually involved in a traffic accident where he was eating a bowl of cereal. This episode came about after discussing it in the IASIP writer's room and no one could get past the fact he was driving while eating cereal.
@@somepointenoughisenough The DVD commentary is fun to listen to in the first 5 or 7 seasons but after that is kinda boring because they barely said anything for some reason. thank god they made a podcast
Interesting! I knew that almost all episode ideas came to them from stuff they heard on the radio, saw on tv, or had happened to them, but not about this particular one. Best comedy show to this day, because despite being in 2022, they are, to my knowledge, the only ones who do not shy from dark humour, racism and non pc humour, violence and drug and alcohol abuse as means of comedy, which I absolutely love, and applaud them for, despite all the butthurt people being triggered. (of course I mean comedy show with real people, cause Family Guy isn't far off)
“This is getting out of hand” sir as long as an episode of this show ends with no buildings burning down and nobody grievously injured, it’s a victory of restraint
There’s an entire wiki page dedicated to crimes the gang has commited and the crimes in this episode are nothing compared to their various accounts of attempted manslaughter 😭
@@wafflefalafel9442That's awesome. I'd say the simultaneous like 10 counts of attempted murder and arson is their most heinous crime. xD ...and a damn funny Thanksgiving episode.
Hello fellow American. This you should vote me. I leave power good. Thank you. Thank you. If you vote me I'm hot. What? Taxes they'll be lower son. The democratic vote for me is right thing to do Philadelphia. So do.
Objection: When Dennis says that the burden of proof is not on him, he is referring to the accusation that he has donkey brains. When Charlie accuses Dennis of having donkey brains, the burden of proof for that accusation is on Charlie. The burden is not on Dennis to prove that he does not have donkey brains.
@@LegalEagle Great channel. Every video is a gem. The comment in the form of an objection thing is really fun, but also kind of hard because there is so little that is objectionable in the video. You didn't have the usual Legal Beagle comment courtesy warning on this video. At least we got to see Stella at 11:58.
Imagine... Several years in law school, thousands of dollars, years of experience as a lawyer... All leading up to you explaining the legal ramifications of a donkey brain certificate. Im proud
Well he's an actual trial attorney, it's not like this is his day job. But in addition to being a trial attorney he also sells a law school prep course that these videos rely on to substantiate his knowledigibility in the law and credibility as a tutor. And I never would have known any of that if not for youtube recommending me these videos, meaning they work very well as free advertisement for both.
Imagine being so dense you think this lawyer works full time as a RUclipsr lol. Honesty if his channel blows up even more, he could potentially make more money on YT than his law firm
I still remember the theory that Pepe Sylvia was Charlie failing to read Pennsylvania on the incoming mail. Shame the writer said that wasn't the intent, because that would have made the whole thing better.
To be fair, Charlie is not completely unable to read. He is just functionally illiterate. Hence, him deciphering "Pepe Sylvia" from "Pennsylvania". Besides, I'm sure Frank provided the documentation and Charlie just followed.
@@rodriguezelfeliz4623 for real not just some of the time practically all the time , assumptions have to be made to create logical models to explain the data that is produced through experimentation
Mac's look of pride when Dee asks if it took him 3 hours to make that says it all. He designed, got the materials, and put it together with care in ONLY 3 hours. He's a master arts and craftsman
I bet the only way Paddy's Pub makes any money is because there are a few regulars who show up every day. Not for the beer or the service, of course. They just want to quietly observe the insane shit the gang argues about
*”I AM GOING TO SCRATCH THE EYES OUT OF EVERYONES SOCKETS”* “And that’s why you never wanna represent yourself in court...” I love how calmly he approaches all of it
This makes you realize how intelligent Charlie, Glenn, and Rob are. Well written and their chemistry makes it seem like they aren't acting. It's one of the best shows ever!
@Melissa Crowell I just thought “how cute”. People who don’t watch it’s Always Sunny are a generally nicer, more innocent breed than the rest of us. They don’t realise that Charlie writes in pictorials... like a caveman.
Charlie: "CAN READ WORDS ON A PAGE" Objection, on several occasions, Charlie has actually shown that he is almost certainly illiterate. Frequently trying to spell words phonetically and being unable to pronounce words not spelled phonetically.
Objection: in the shot at 7:02 it states that Charlie Kelly is a bird expert but in actuality his expertise is in bird LAW. A subtle but important difference. Not to say there isn't any overlap between the two.
Yeah. I don't think he watches It's always sunny. Or if he does, I'm a little worried about his capacity for thought, in which case I wouldn't want the man as my lawyer. Boy I hope he just isn't familiar with the show. Although, it might explain why someone went to school to become a lawyer, yet decided to run a RUclips channel...
Always Tempted yeah, he likely doesn’t watch the show. All he does is just study recommended TV scenes to explain them. Also, he made this channel in order to educate people on the topic of law. It’s like Doctor Mike (a common comparison). Doc. is a confirmed practitioner of medicine, but the fact he owns a channel doesn’t soil his record. Same applies here. Mr. Eagle is a confirmed practitioner of law, but the fact he owns a channel doesn’t soil his record.
Always Tempted he CLEARLY isn’t familiar with the show. Don’t attack someone’s credibility in their profession AND their intelligence just because they don’t watch the same media as you
In a recent IASIP podcast they reveiled that they wrote this script on what happened to Glenn that morning. He was actually driving while eating cereal and someone bumped into him, they got into the same argument in the office.
Watching a man... who has persevered his way through law school... who has come to such a high point in a great career... attempt to interpret and discuss the antics of "The Gang"... gives me a weird sense of hope for the universe. I feel oddly content right now.
@@St1ckY72 That's how it always should be, if you agree or disagree and got nothing to add. Instead of writing a variation of "I wish I could like this more than once!" or "your stupid". This isn't Facebook. Well...at some point in the past Google wanted it to be something similar.
10:14 Objection: Chatlie was likely not, fact, being facetious. He has a character for being easily convinced to change his stance on a variety of issues related to the gang.
@@mikebarnes7441 "Please learn English" due to a simple typo. T is the neighboring key of T, so it's reasonable to assume that it was a simple mistake. By your logic, I could say the same thing to you due to your lack of a full stop at the end of your sentence. Knock yourself down a peg. Arrogance is very irritating to almost everyone.
@@mikebarnes7441 And as for the "not, fact, being facetious...," There was likely a line break there for him. Regardless of the circumstance, his minor errors are inconsequential at best.
@@jayq.mcburger9030 So, by your logic everyone that gets "screwed because everyone else is on the majority" is searching to "play the victim & get more government handouts." That logic seems flawed, and really quite bigoted. The reality revolving around the minority, is much different. Not only do a large percentage do well in society, but they are fighting against a system that was not designed to be easy for them. I do not believe it is wise pretend you know what Corto Maltese is referring to. He did not even describe any particular example that you can analyze to determine anything.. you have just prejudged him, and assumed the worst.. even though the worst is not the most common scenario. But maybe I'm wrong in my thinking. Maybe society is better when we don't listen to each other, and we just form horrible biased opinions of each other with very little basis in reality.
@@SDsc0rch Republic and democracy refer to two separate things - a republic is a country with an elected head of state, and has nothing to do with being a democracy or not.
@@5them334 The Chewbacca Defense. Based on an episode of South Park in which Chef sues a major record label and Johnny Cochran, the label's lawyer, starts bringing up ridiculous arguments about Chewbacca being on Endor in Star Wars: Return of the Jedi. Within legal circles it's become a term for when a defense attorney makes completely irrelevant and illogical arguments with the goal of confusing the jury. The hope for the defense attorney in that case is that the jury then interprets their confusion as doubt, which could then result in a not guilty verdict.
Better Call Saul with the cell phone trial next! --Didn't expect this to blow up so quickly! Would also love to see his take on "Hero or Hate Crime" from IASIP
Objection: Hadley v. Baxendale is a contracts case about the extent of damages owed. The more on point 1L case would be Palsgraf, since this is a tort case and the issue is whether Frank is the proximate cause of Dennis’s damages. But the test for each case is basically the same-foreseeability. Also can someone please send this to my parents so they know I only wasted most my time messing around in school?
I concur in the objection. Furthermore, a specific analysis should be done to determine whether the question is now that of proximate cause or, in fact, an instance where the Defendant takes the Plaintiff as he comes. I would move on summary judgment (or motion in limine) to exclude any and all arguments about assumption of the risk, as assumption requires Plaintiff's speicifc knowledge of the harm that could occur. I think, as a matter of law, you do not assume the risk of a rear-end collision. As opposed to walking over ice and falling (one of the more popular AOR defenses). Similarly, no comparative or contributory negligence is available as Dennis' act in eating the cereal doesnt require any duty and was not the proximate cause of the spill. 2 cents. PS- glad you circled back at the end and cleaned up that (if it was an arb) party's make their rules in arb, so objectionable evidence in normal proceedings could be entirely permissible! Great video!
The assumption of risk, seems to be that in any given situation the cereal could spill and ruin the interior of the car. It could have happened with a hard left turn, or with a rear end collision.
This show has TOUCHED almost every sensitive and taboo subjects out there few shows are willing to delve into. Unapologetically confronted the societal hypocrisies and double standards. This was practically a documentary of human behavior if we were to actually FREELY express and act on our thoughts and emotions. To think he would say that in an episode which actually is about attacking one's character. Wow. Just offensive. That's like saying a show couldn't be RIDICULOUS and smart at the same time. Practically contradicted himself applauding something good (less than a minute ago) coming from something "stupid".
Well I think we’re being pedantic for the sake of it here. Really it’s a smart show ABOUT stupid people. A show can be simultaneously clever and stupid, and you’re reading too much into it if you think it was meant as an insult.
Overruled: dicta from the case McPoyle v Ponderosa indicates that birds can in fact be held legally liable even to the point of execution via tiny guillotine.
Your honor, I would like to submit into evidence this recording of my defendant's voice. The shrill tones indicate her relation to the hummingbird family (trochilidae) and thus makes her a legal tender, subject to a different set of rules under the jurisdiction of the Department of Treasury
The bird in question is Deandra Reynolds, and since the party has many a time claimed that Dee is in fact a "bird" and the party agreed upon her being capable of paying, the sentencing should stay on place.
@@wvman2374 objection: precedent doesn't act retrospectively, therefore obiter in a later case should have no bearing on this. let the bony bird lady be acquitted
Thank you for going to law school and building a legal career so you could make these videos and seriously utter statements involving phrases like donkey brains.
This was an ACTUAL thing that happened to Glenn/Dennis irl; he was, in fact, eating cereal in an event where he got rear ended. He had to pay for his own vent cleaning.
5:52 It just hit me that Dennis, just like Ted Bundy, Mike DeBardeleben and Alton Coleman, three narcissistic serial killers, defended himself in that fake trial.
i know this is old but dennis was made by the creators to become more sociopathic over the seasons. idk why but that’s why probably why it’s like that.
@@OccupancyZero he could do a combo episode with the world series defense, kitten mittens, and the one where Frank buys that foreclosed house since there wouldnt be enough in each episode to do a full length
20:05 Objection: while the arbitration doesn't set a precedent for state or federal law, the main characters can still agree to treat it as a precedent for disputes within their group, which I think is what Dee wanted.
Yeah, her car(s) is always the one being destroyed, of course she wants to set a precedent for the group to pay for damages, but I’m assuming LegalEgal didn’t infer this because he doesn’t commonly watch the show
If no one has recommended this already, there is an always sunny episode where they meet with an arbitrator to settle the dispute over who is the rightful owner of this scratch off lottery ticket. You should definitely review that one as well!
if i remember right, that's what it appears as at first but it turns out they were trying to figure out whether or not one of them committed a hate crime or was a hero for calling mac a slur whilst saving him from a falling piano
The terminology used here simply states "•Established that Frank Recieved document •Can Read Words on page" meaning that Frank's eyesight is good enough to read what is on the document and in turn is good enough for him to be a safe driver
@@spacemonkey3051 False, myopia allows one to read close up objects, but not see far away objects. For instance, I would have no problem reading a certificate in my hands without my glasses, but without my glasses I would be unable to identify really anything while driving.
Objection: When Dennis was talking about not having the burden of proof, he was not referring to the case itself, but only the argument that he doesn't have Donkey Brains
Yep was gonna say that. Charlie made the claim that Dennis might have Donkey Brains, it's his job to make an argument on why Dennis would have Donkey Brains not on Dennis to prove he doesn't.
@@Robot-Overlord I challenge your motion to include a "no pants" stipulation based on testimony from [pants dance V. no pants dance] and move to strike any reference to being pantsless from the record.
please cover the actual arbitration episode of its always sunny called - "Hero or Hate Crime?" there is also another episode held in an actual court room thats called the world series defense....i never realized how many legal episodes its always sunny has
Of course there would be lots of legal episodes. One of the main gags of It’s always sunny is seeing how horrible, insane, and asinine the gang can be. What better way to showcase this after seasons of “normal people” and other crazies interacting with and being corrupted by the gang then by putting them into a typically professional environment(and watching the professionals interact with, and be corrupted by, the gang.)
7:19 “can read words on a page” That’s supposed to be a joke where like “oh obviously, an adult person can read” but at the same time Like I’m pretty sure Charlie can’t read that.
The tragic humor at the end with poor Dee having to pay for the car damages is- that in previous episodes of the show, her car or cars she had always in up damaged by the rest of the gang. 😃
This channel is a great example of something I had no idea I wanted. I've always been interested in law, but not really enough to go to school for it. I feel like this is a great way for me to passively learn while also getting a good laugh. Doing episodes on It's Always Sunny was a great call. The show has a huge audience and people like me found the channel because of the subject matter of the episode. Your editing is great as well. Huge props to this channel. I will be subscribing!
Same! I've seen some episodes of Legal Eagle before, but this one definitely got me to subscribe. The earlier episodes just focused on short scenes from various works. I love these more in depth episodes about one show or movie. Especially when they center around something as entertaining as IASIP.
@@celia9112 this isnt a court room episode either. It's an arbitration -although it's not an official one- which means he would probably do an actual arbitration episode
Objection: when Dee talks about precident, she does not say ‘legal precident.’ I think it is reasonable to assume that she wants to set the (non-legal) precident among her (lunk-headed) friends that actions have consequences.
@@Trazynthekleptomaniac69 Ah yes. My one typo made from a cell phone while at a cafe is equal to all the idiocy these people get up to in this episode, let alone the whole of the series. Also, person calling out grade-school level English mistakes forgot to put a period at the end of their sentence so . . . maybe don't judge a person's intellect based on a single error made from one of the most obfuscating written languages of the planet? FYI, I have a master's degree in Linguistics. Doesn't mean I always spell everything 100% perfect on the internet. No one does.
Let's make a list of all the sunny episodes with law clips. - Dennis Gets Divorced (arbitration over properties and the first we see of Uncle Jack's obsession with hand size) - The Gang Takes Advantage of the Mortgage Crisis (beginning of bird law ppl!! Standard boiler plate, y'all.) - Paddy's Pub: Home of the Original Kitten Mittens (contract validity after ingestion by the other party? This contract had ink that had been dry for many forknights, mind you. Also, alternative forms of payment for legal services!!) - The World Series Defense (might be a shorter one, but there's always little clips you can add on for a misc episode! Like the end of The Gang Gets Extreme: Home Makeover Addition, and Dennis and Dee's Mom is Dead) ... I can't think of anymore rn, but please add on if you can!! Mr. LegalEagle please do more episodes from my favorite show! ty
My best friend growing up turned out to be almost exactly like Dennis, from the way he talks down to his mannerisms. Even some of his logic, how he thinks so highly of himself, and his outbursts. When I started watching Always Sunny I was freaking out because of how similar they are, it felt like they based the character off of him.
When the Legal Eagle guy said he shouldn't represent himself ...well yes it's not a good idea but the thing is narcissistic people frequently opt to represent themselves in court so it makes perfect sense for his character. LOL. He's a five star man in his own mind.
Objection: When Charlie is accusing Dennis of having Donkey Brains, the burden of proof is not on Dennis because Dennis is the one being accused. He is not the plaintiff vis-a-vis the Donkey Brains question
"I hope we get back to the root issue and the original case." Ahhhh lol. Whenever I start an episode of It's Always Sunny, whatever the first thing in the episode is, is a good indication for what the episode is NOT gonna be about lmao.
A Legality Check of Season 12 Episode 6, It's Always Sunny in Philadelphia. "Hero or Hate Crime?" The gang seeks help from a professional arbitrator. It is the final installment to date of legal proceedings in the series.
Objection! At 21:11, you referred to It’s always sunny in Philadelphia, a 12 season long, regarded by many as the best show of all time, as “a stupid show”. I move to have that subjective comment stricken from the record.
i don't think he's trying to say that it's not a good show/a bad show? like this is my favorite show but he's valid in calling it stupid bc the gang r stupid..... iasip is morosexual rights!!
@@MrMongoose221 Wasn't there also something with Hugh Honey and Vic Vinegar? Maybe when Frank was trying to evict a family out of a house he bought? I feel like they have quite a few "legal" episodes. LOL
19:39 Oh No, Not touching that one! ...so I looked it up. Among the most controversial figures of the Simpson trial was L.A. homicide detective Mark Fuhrman. Responsible for discovering the "bloody glove" at the murder scene, Fuhrman did what the LAPD refused to do to Simpson - he threw the former NFL star in jail. Although Fuhrman denied ever having racist tendencies or using the n-word, a taped interview he had chosen to do 10 years earlier revealed otherwise. In the recording, he was quoted as saying to incarcerated Black people: "You do what you're told, understand, n-word?"
Washington State distracted driving law allows for eating, but if you get pulled over for a distracted driving citation you could get penalized for eating. But WA State allows for cereal and other items to be eaten while driving. :)
What makes this show funny is how everything occurs in an absurdly incongruous environment. In the Bird Law episode, a funny, unrealistic, family drama is taking place in an actual courtroom, and in this episode, a much more realistic, trial-like proceeding is taking place in a bar.
If your name is legal eagle does that mean you are a professional in bird law?
Jared Bonner YES
Ooooohhhh! Wish I'd thought of that one.
Jared Bonner OGLGMOFKDNSNDMKEOF
kinda mad i didnt think of this
Really underrated comment 😂👏🏻
Trivia: Glenn Howerton (Dennis) was actually involved in a traffic accident where he was eating a bowl of cereal. This episode came about after discussing it in the IASIP writer's room and no one could get past the fact he was driving while eating cereal.
That's what they said in the podcast
@@ollcanoe he also said it long ago on the DVD commentary
@@somepointenoughisenough The DVD commentary is fun to listen to in the first 5 or 7 seasons but after that is kinda boring because they barely said anything for some reason. thank god they made a podcast
Interesting! I knew that almost all episode ideas came to them from stuff they heard on the radio, saw on tv, or had happened to them, but not about this particular one. Best comedy show to this day, because despite being in 2022, they are, to my knowledge, the only ones who do not shy from dark humour, racism and non pc humour, violence and drug and alcohol abuse as means of comedy, which I absolutely love, and applaud them for, despite all the butthurt people being triggered. (of course I mean comedy show with real people, cause Family Guy isn't far off)
@@andrewlemmon2678 it didn't exist 9 months ago when i wrote that brother
“This is getting out of hand” sir as long as an episode of this show ends with no buildings burning down and nobody grievously injured, it’s a victory of restraint
🧐😂😂
- How's anybody gonna get hurt?
"Frank Sets Sweet Dee On Fire".
There’s an entire wiki page dedicated to crimes the gang has commited and the crimes in this episode are nothing compared to their various accounts of attempted manslaughter 😭
@@wafflefalafel9442That's awesome. I'd say the simultaneous like 10 counts of attempted murder and arson is their most heinous crime. xD ...and a damn funny Thanksgiving episode.
Don't forget, Cricket looking more grotesque every episode
LegalEagle: "Charlie Kelly can read words on a page."
Me: "Objection!"
Hello fellow American. This you should vote me. I leave power good. Thank you. Thank you. If you vote me I'm hot. What? Taxes they'll be lower son. The democratic vote for me is right thing to do Philadelphia. So do.
@@africanoblackaldo1569 please write comments that are even slightly coherent and i might vote you or whatever you want
@@ChirpFPV I…I seriously can’t tell if this was serious or not
@@ChirpFPV just in case you don't know, it's a reference to the show. It's a campaign speech Charlie wrote for Dennis
He'll adapt
Objection: When Dennis says that the burden of proof is not on him, he is referring to the accusation that he has donkey brains. When Charlie accuses Dennis of having donkey brains, the burden of proof for that accusation is on Charlie. The burden is not on Dennis to prove that he does not have donkey brains.
Ya, that could be fair. Sustained.
@@LegalEagle Great channel. Every video is a gem. The comment in the form of an objection thing is really fun, but also kind of hard because there is so little that is objectionable in the video.
You didn't have the usual Legal Beagle comment courtesy warning on this video. At least we got to see Stella at 11:58.
...and that's why the law is complicated.
Imagine... Several years in law school, thousands of dollars, years of experience as a lawyer... All leading up to you explaining the legal ramifications of a donkey brain certificate. Im proud
He seems like he does just fine lol
HUNDREDS of thousands of dollars
basically free advertising, but can make some change, if get enough views lol smart def a real lawyer
Well he's an actual trial attorney, it's not like this is his day job. But in addition to being a trial attorney he also sells a law school prep course that these videos rely on to substantiate his knowledigibility in the law and credibility as a tutor. And I never would have known any of that if not for youtube recommending me these videos, meaning they work very well as free advertisement for both.
Imagine being so dense you think this lawyer works full time as a RUclipsr lol. Honesty if his channel blows up even more, he could potentially make more money on YT than his law firm
>Charlie Kelly
>Can Read Words On a Page
That's debatable
Yeah! Charlie's whole premise in the show is that he cannot read.
He adapts to reading
I still remember the theory that Pepe Sylvia was Charlie failing to read Pennsylvania on the incoming mail. Shame the writer said that wasn't the intent, because that would have made the whole thing better.
To be fair, Charlie is not completely unable to read. He is just functionally illiterate. Hence, him deciphering "Pepe Sylvia" from "Pennsylvania". Besides, I'm sure Frank provided the documentation and Charlie just followed.
@@psychesomatic690
Hey you see that door marked "Pirate" over there? You think a pirate lives there?
The “Science is a Liar Sometimes” part is hands down the funniest part of the episode.
I know I am taking this way too seriously, but science is actually a liar sometimes
@@rodriguezelfeliz4623 for real not just some of the time practically all the time , assumptions have to be made to create logical models to explain the data that is produced through experimentation
Charlie: "Yeah, he's making me feel stupid, like one of those science bitches." XD
@@rodriguezelfeliz4623 Haha it's not that science is a liar tho, its that humans are flawed and imperfect
@@rodriguezelfeliz4623 And religion is a liar ALL the time 🤷♂️😂
Mac's look of pride when Dee asks if it took him 3 hours to make that says it all. He designed, got the materials, and put it together with care in ONLY 3 hours. He's a master arts and craftsman
he's so proud it's adorable lmao
It’s also genuinely a way better graph than any other member of the gang has created, regardless of the time it took them to do it
I love that one guy sitting in the background drinking a beer during the whole thing.
That is a on going thing throughout the series.
Check it out sometime I noticed it awhile back i think its awesome its like a easter egg.
For some reason I think I seen a R.I.P. for him after an episode. Can anyone confirm that?
@@danp1471 yes. He died, I think during season 11
@@tylorkelly168 Different guy. The Ernie during season 5 where they had a memorial for the actor after the episode after the kitten mittens episode
I bet the only way Paddy's Pub makes any money is because there are a few regulars who show up every day. Not for the beer or the service, of course. They just want to quietly observe the insane shit the gang argues about
THERE IS LITERALLY AN EPISODE WHERE THE GANG HIRE AN ARBITRATOR!
Why don't you analyse that episode? 'Hero or Hate Crime?'
yes please do this ep! (season 12, episode 6)
I was literally coming to the comments to say this lol. I agree!
That's the one I was trying to remember too.
That episode is HILARIOUS!!! 😂🤣
*arbitrators 😂😂
Wow maybe yell about it some more kid
*”I AM GOING TO SCRATCH THE EYES OUT OF EVERYONES SOCKETS”*
“And that’s why you never wanna represent yourself in court...”
I love how calmly he approaches all of it
7:00
Objection!
Charlie Kelly is not a bird expert, he's "The best goddamn bird lawyer in the world"
Suspect.
bird law isnt governed by reason.
Charlie is definitely not a bird, so he can't be a bird lawyer.
I hope the Legal Beagle didnt read this. XD
@@88michaelandersen
The bombshell!
Poor Dee, even an actual lawyer won’t side with her.
Lmaoooooo
This guy's got nothing to do with her. He doesn't specialise in bird law
Dan Saunders the implication of his name title says so
Shut up bird
It's the best when she's constantly belittled by idiots, yet constantly tries to be a part of them. Sad, but it makes her one of my favorites.
This makes you realize how intelligent Charlie, Glenn, and Rob are. Well written and their chemistry makes it seem like they aren't acting. It's one of the best shows ever!
And explains why the show has gotten worse as other people have taken over the writing.
WatcherFall it’s still a great show
@@capo328 I love some of the newer episodes
@@capo328 for it to be the longest running live-action comedy series of all time, I think its done very well staying consistent
@watcherfall. Shut up dee!
“I think Charlie is being facetious”
No, he’s just...he’s special.
Lmao I thought Charlie was being dead serious in that scene
Hes made himself perfectly redundant
@@Ziploc-vg8oz He was 100% serious in that scene
“Charlie is being facetious here”
What. No. Charlie is pretty straightforwardly dumb. 😂😂
I was like, he clearly doesn't watch sunny enough to know how Charlie acts
Never attribute facetiousness to Charlie when idiocy is wide open.
I don't know that he is even capable of being facetious or even pronouncing the word.
@Melissa Crowell I just thought “how cute”. People who don’t watch it’s Always Sunny are a generally nicer, more innocent breed than the rest of us.
They don’t realise that Charlie writes in pictorials... like a caveman.
Your forgot the Objection
"I think charlie is being facetious here".... charlie couldn't even say the word facetious
Much less spell it
he can say face t-shirt, what are you talking about?
Uh filibuster?
Of course he can.
Fay See Tee Us
That’s like 7:19 “can read words on a page”. Nope.
Charlie:
"CAN READ WORDS ON A PAGE"
Objection, on several occasions, Charlie has actually shown that he is almost certainly illiterate. Frequently trying to spell words phonetically and being unable to pronounce words not spelled phonetically.
Spelling bees they ask language of origin because they have different phonetic rules.
Objection sustained
ILL ALLOW IT
Jesse Cook That’s why Charlie had Mac read the certificate.
@@hydrolito you just blew my mind and also explained something I've always kind of wondered.
He can read. He just doesn’t like to.
Objection: in the shot at 7:02 it states that Charlie Kelly is a bird expert but in actuality his expertise is in bird LAW. A subtle but important difference. Not to say there isn't any overlap between the two.
"I think Charlie was being facetious here." You obviously do not know Charlie, my friend.
thank you
Yeah. I don't think he watches It's always sunny. Or if he does, I'm a little worried about his capacity for thought, in which case I wouldn't want the man as my lawyer.
Boy I hope he just isn't familiar with the show.
Although, it might explain why someone went to school to become a lawyer, yet decided to run a RUclips channel...
Always Tempted yeah, he likely doesn’t watch the show. All he does is just study recommended TV scenes to explain them. Also, he made this channel in order to educate people on the topic of law. It’s like Doctor Mike (a common comparison). Doc. is a confirmed practitioner of medicine, but the fact he owns a channel doesn’t soil his record. Same applies here. Mr. Eagle is a confirmed practitioner of law, but the fact he owns a channel doesn’t soil his record.
@@2350CST Objection, hearsay.
That's lawyer talk, that's stuff a lawyer says
Always Tempted he CLEARLY isn’t familiar with the show. Don’t attack someone’s credibility in their profession AND their intelligence just because they don’t watch the same media as you
I find it amusing that this seems more accurate to court, than the episode where they were actually in court.
This episode is more accurate than some great courtroom dramas.
CHARLIE ISN'T A BIRD EXPERT, HE'S AN EXPERT IN BRID LAW, THIS VIDEO SHOULD BE STRICKEN FROM THE RECORD
Jack Carlyle....filibuster....
What’s “brid law”?
Tived Nagol maybe Charlie wrote this
@@tivednagol9127 it's the judicial processes involving bird lawyerings
Unfavourably, they misspelled “bird”. That’s what my original comment was about.
In a recent IASIP podcast they reveiled that they wrote this script on what happened to Glenn that morning. He was actually driving while eating cereal and someone bumped into him, they got into the same argument in the office.
Watching a man... who has persevered his way through law school... who has come to such a high point in a great career... attempt to interpret and discuss the antics of "The Gang"... gives me a weird sense of hope for the universe. I feel oddly content right now.
I love how many people agree and yet no replies 3 days later...
@@St1ckY72 That's how it always should be, if you agree or disagree and got nothing to add. Instead of writing a variation of "I wish I could like this more than once!" or "your stupid". This isn't Facebook. Well...at some point in the past Google wanted it to be something similar.
blinus42 Is
Arbitration is a thing in this case. Also the gang should sue for libel.
@@Brax1982 true
Objection: putting an eyepatch on Stella the legal Beagle doesn't make her scary. It only makes her more adorable.
Am I allowed to second an objection?
Third.
Fourth.
Overruled!
Order in the court! I'd agree with you, but then I wouldn't be impartial.
10:14 Objection: Chatlie was likely not, fact, being facetious. He has a character for being easily convinced to change his stance on a variety of issues related to the gang.
I'll allow it!
Please learn English
@@mikebarnes7441 stfu not everyone in the world knows to speak English like it's their first language
@@mikebarnes7441 "Please learn English" due to a simple typo. T is the neighboring key of T, so it's reasonable to assume that it was a simple mistake. By your logic, I could say the same thing to you due to your lack of a full stop at the end of your sentence. Knock yourself down a peg. Arrogance is very irritating to almost everyone.
@@mikebarnes7441 And as for the "not, fact, being facetious...," There was likely a line break there for him. Regardless of the circumstance, his minor errors are inconsequential at best.
Did any other Sunny fans chuckle when they saw Charlie’s description slide say “can read words on a page”?😂
hahaha yes
"Sometimes you get screwed because everyone else is on the majority" couldn't say it better.
that's why the United States is a republic and NOT a democracy
democracy is mob rule - the minority gets... "screwed"
Corto Maltese lol sometimes you just wanna play the victim & get more government handouts
Jay Q. McBurger sometimes you try to be clever in the comments and fall flat on your face lol
@@jayq.mcburger9030 So, by your logic everyone that gets "screwed because everyone else is on the majority" is searching to "play the victim & get more government handouts."
That logic seems flawed, and really quite bigoted. The reality revolving around the minority, is much different. Not only do a large percentage do well in society, but they are fighting against a system that was not designed to be easy for them. I do not believe it is wise pretend you know what Corto Maltese is referring to. He did not even describe any particular example that you can analyze to determine anything.. you have just prejudged him, and assumed the worst.. even though the worst is not the most common scenario.
But maybe I'm wrong in my thinking. Maybe society is better when we don't listen to each other, and we just form horrible biased opinions of each other with very little basis in reality.
@@SDsc0rch Republic and democracy refer to two separate things - a republic is a country with an elected head of state, and has nothing to do with being a democracy or not.
Sunny has a whole episode about arbitration.
Hero or Hate Crime? s12 e6. Do that next!
Absolutely....my favorite all time episode
Yes that would be a great episode to do.
Lee Campbell YESSS!!!
yesssssss
Not to mention the ass pounder
"Reasonability! Foreseeability! NEGLIGENCE! This is FUN STUFF!" Only a lawyer could make such an statement
But you could tell by the joy on his face that he meant it. And philosophical debate is so great.
Btw, that's *a* statement.
...so why are you watching?
I get an enormous amount of enjoyment from hearing a legitimate lawyer repeatedly using the words "donkey brains."
It's so funny! 😂😂😂
Will he do "Hero or Hate Crime" next? because its literally about an arbitration lol
I’d also like to the see the World Series defense and MAC is a serial killer
I want to see that one but he’d probably have to bleep out the whole episode for RUclips
@@alexanderfrasco3698 this would fall under torts. I tort is a job contractual of civil wrong. It isn't actually illegal it's just wrong.
raidthanfl omg the World Series episode is one of my favorites
The fact that lawyers use a term coined on southpark might be the best thing I've ever heard.
What term
@@5them334 The Chewbacca Defense
It's not the only term lawyers use from Southpark. I forget what the other one is though.
We've memed our way into culture dominance.
@@5them334 The Chewbacca Defense. Based on an episode of South Park in which Chef sues a major record label and Johnny Cochran, the label's lawyer, starts bringing up ridiculous arguments about Chewbacca being on Endor in Star Wars: Return of the Jedi. Within legal circles it's become a term for when a defense attorney makes completely irrelevant and illogical arguments with the goal of confusing the jury. The hope for the defense attorney in that case is that the jury then interprets their confusion as doubt, which could then result in a not guilty verdict.
There's another arbitration scene in always sunny, episode named "Hero or Hate Crime". A cunning mix of lawyers and dildos.
@@CongoTheBongo objection: badgering the witness
“If it smells like shit you must acquit!”
That would be a great episode
I would love to see a video on the IASIP episode “Hero or Hate crime” with the arbitration scenes
They all just smoking cigarettes before the end of that episode 😂
One of my favorites!
Gotta love "the bike"
One of my fav episodes
That was an amazing episode
i still maintain that the ticket should've been Dee's since she bought it
Better Call Saul with the cell phone trial next!
--Didn't expect this to blow up so quickly! Would also love to see his take on "Hero or Hate Crime" from IASIP
yes please
And chicanery
Great suggestion
When? All I see is the first episode
Very this.
Objection:
Hadley v. Baxendale is a contracts case about the extent of damages owed. The more on point 1L case would be Palsgraf, since this is a tort case and the issue is whether Frank is the proximate cause of Dennis’s damages. But the test for each case is basically the same-foreseeability. Also can someone please send this to my parents so they know I only wasted most my time messing around in school?
Mrs. Knight, please excuse Dylan from his chores. He made a very good point on the internet. -DJ
Damn it, I typed a whole objection outlining the crazy facts of Palsgraff before seeing what you already wrote.
I concur in the objection. Furthermore, a specific analysis should be done to determine whether the question is now that of proximate cause or, in fact, an instance where the Defendant takes the Plaintiff as he comes. I would move on summary judgment (or motion in limine) to exclude any and all arguments about assumption of the risk, as assumption requires Plaintiff's speicifc knowledge of the harm that could occur. I think, as a matter of law, you do not assume the risk of a rear-end collision. As opposed to walking over ice and falling (one of the more popular AOR defenses). Similarly, no comparative or contributory negligence is available as Dennis' act in eating the cereal doesnt require any duty and was not the proximate cause of the spill. 2 cents. PS- glad you circled back at the end and cleaned up that (if it was an arb) party's make their rules in arb, so objectionable evidence in normal proceedings could be entirely permissible! Great video!
@@Sam_on_RUclips Oh yea... Me too!
The assumption of risk, seems to be that in any given situation the cereal could spill and ruin the interior of the car. It could have happened with a hard left turn, or with a rear end collision.
Always sunny: hero or hate crime next please
anon ymous the best
great idea
YES!! i was just thinking that!
THIS
Yes!
You had me until “stupid show “
I’ll see you in court
This show has TOUCHED almost every sensitive and taboo subjects out there few shows are willing to delve into. Unapologetically confronted the societal hypocrisies and double standards. This was practically a documentary of human behavior if we were to actually FREELY express and act on our thoughts and emotions. To think he would say that in an episode which actually is about attacking one's character. Wow. Just offensive.
That's like saying a show couldn't be RIDICULOUS and smart at the same time. Practically contradicted himself applauding something good (less than a minute ago) coming from something "stupid".
Well I think we’re being pedantic for the sake of it here. Really it’s a smart show ABOUT stupid people. A show can be simultaneously clever and stupid, and you’re reading too much into it if you think it was meant as an insult.
I wouldn't call the show stupid but the characters are really stupid. I love always sunny its like a live-action cartoon.
@@savagebuck the show used to be like that until Rob went woke and now the shows garbage 🗑.
I mean it is stupid.
It's also smart
That why it's great.
“I can’t believe this is coming from this stupid show!”
Well that’s because it’s NOT stupid. It’s silly and immature but also clever and satirical.
I agree. Brilliant show. I don't think this guy understands.
@@halleycapps1885 He is bloody lawyer. Cut him some slack.
@@bahadrozturk2086 why cut him slack? How does going to law school allow you a pass??
@@bahadrozturk2086 What even is a *bloody* lawyer?
@Bert Visscher I believe it is a lawyer on halloween.
Season 12 Episode 6: “Hero or Hate Crime” is an arbitration episode
I TOTALLY FORGOT ABOUT THIS ONE I would love to see him do this one.
Oh he has to do that one.
Yes please
Objection!
This lawyer's hands are much too small.
jimjam totheflimflam they are I can’t focus
He should do commercials and hold products to make them look bigger. He missed his calling
jimjam totheflimflam I THOUGHT THE CAMERA WAS GONNA ADD TEN POUNDS
Somehow, your objection is an example of both a non sequitur and an ad hominem
@@rosegold5720 stupid law nerd couldnt even make I more smarter!
(Both lines are jokes taken from It's always sunny, btw)
Every time the real life lawyer says the phrase “donkey brains” I lose my shit lol
I kept expecting him to use a different word like, "dumb" , "spacy" or "irresponsible" but everytime he said donkey brains made my day lol 💫
Objection: This is not a just outcome as birds cannot be held legally accountable for damages to a vehicle. See Boeing v Bird Strike (1956)
Overruled: dicta from the case McPoyle v Ponderosa indicates that birds can in fact be held legally liable even to the point of execution via tiny guillotine.
Your honor, I would like to submit into evidence this recording of my defendant's voice. The shrill tones indicate her relation to the hummingbird family (trochilidae) and thus makes her a legal tender, subject to a different set of rules under the jurisdiction of the Department of Treasury
The bird in question is Deandra Reynolds, and since the party has many a time claimed that Dee is in fact a "bird" and the party agreed upon her being capable of paying, the sentencing should stay on place.
I actually had to stop myself from howling with laughter at 3 am when I read this. Well done
@@wvman2374 objection: precedent doesn't act retrospectively, therefore obiter in a later case should have no bearing on this. let the bony bird lady be acquitted
Oh god, another Always Sunny one. Does this mean the episode with the arbitration over the lottery ticket is next?
We can only hope🤞.
Bismuth Crystal I certainly hope so
I hope so!
it's called hero or hate crime?
PLEASE
Thank you for going to law school and building a legal career so you could make these videos and seriously utter statements involving phrases like donkey brains.
That's a legal certificate buddy
This was an ACTUAL thing that happened to Glenn/Dennis irl; he was, in fact, eating cereal in an event where he got rear ended.
He had to pay for his own vent cleaning.
5:52 It just hit me that Dennis, just like Ted Bundy, Mike DeBardeleben and Alton Coleman, three narcissistic serial killers, defended himself in that fake trial.
Rodney Alcala too, that trial was a circus
i know this is old but dennis was made by the creators to become more sociopathic over the seasons. idk why but that’s why probably why it’s like that.
Please do S12E6 "hero or hate crime?" next!
Condor yes please!
Also s5ep6 the world series defense
this thread is making me realize how many pseudo-legal-themed episodes there are.
@@OccupancyZero he could do a combo episode with the world series defense, kitten mittens, and the one where Frank buys that foreclosed house since there wouldnt be enough in each episode to do a full length
this
20:05 Objection: while the arbitration doesn't set a precedent for state or federal law, the main characters can still agree to treat it as a precedent for disputes within their group, which I think is what Dee wanted.
Yeah, her car(s) is always the one being destroyed, of course she wants to set a precedent for the group to pay for damages, but I’m assuming LegalEgal didn’t infer this because he doesn’t commonly watch the show
If no one has recommended this already, there is an always sunny episode where they meet with an arbitrator to settle the dispute over who is the rightful owner of this scratch off lottery ticket. You should definitely review that one as well!
if i remember right, that's what it appears as at first but it turns out they were trying to figure out whether or not one of them committed a hate crime or was a hero for calling mac a slur whilst saving him from a falling piano
The episode is actually called "Hero or Hate crime"!! Definitely on the list of top 10 episodes.hahah
7:17
Objection!
Charlie Kelly is illiterate and most certainly CANNOT read words on a page
How do we know Charlie doesn't have Donkey Brains 😎
*"Does he have such certif-icateeee?* 😄
i second this
The terminology used here simply states "•Established that Frank Recieved document •Can Read Words on page" meaning that Frank's eyesight is good enough to read what is on the document and in turn is good enough for him to be a safe driver
Charlie's illiteracy is actually rather inconsistent. Sometimes he can sorta read things
@@spacemonkey3051 False, myopia allows one to read close up objects, but not see far away objects. For instance, I would have no problem reading a certificate in my hands without my glasses, but without my glasses I would be unable to identify really anything while driving.
Always Sunny the most legally accurate show on TV CONFIRMED
Yeah, law and order has nothing on always sunny
Objection: When Dennis was talking about not having the burden of proof, he was not referring to the case itself, but only the argument that he doesn't have Donkey Brains
I would love to see a video on the IASIP episode “Hero or Hate crime” with the arbitration scenes
Yep was gonna say that. Charlie made the claim that Dennis might have Donkey Brains, it's his job to make an argument on why Dennis would have Donkey Brains not on Dennis to prove he doesn't.
@@ruthlee5021 sure you've seen it by now but if not, he did that one too
I love that you're trying to find a single grain of logic in these psychopaths
Objection! Only Dennis is a psychopath.
Please, please, please do the Always Sunny episode, Hero or Hate Crime!!!
oh my god yes please!!!
Bumping this
Sweet Jesus yes
I came here to say this.
yes
Objection.
LegalEagle is probably not wearing pants since he's filmed from the waist up.
His credentials have been shattered.
I would like to counter your objection with another objection... how do we know you were wearing pants when you made this objection?
@@MrNickyDalenz I object to the idea that anyone writes youtube comments in pants.
@@Robot-Overlord I challenge your motion to include a "no pants" stipulation based on testimony from [pants dance V. no pants dance] and move to strike any reference to being pantsless from the record.
Jack Lazer he’s totally not wearing pants, and for that I’m grateful
Au contraire, we still don't know the quality of his credentials. Until he stands up, anyway.
please cover the actual arbitration episode of its always sunny called - "Hero or Hate Crime?" there is also another episode held in an actual court room thats called the world series defense....i never realized how many legal episodes its always sunny has
Roger Hamilton haha yeah this has been eyeopening
they're always committing crimes lmao
Of course there would be lots of legal episodes. One of the main gags of It’s always sunny is seeing how horrible, insane, and asinine the gang can be. What better way to showcase this after seasons of “normal people” and other crazies interacting with and being corrupted by the gang then by putting them into a typically professional environment(and watching the professionals interact with, and be corrupted by, the gang.)
I wonder if he would also look at S5Ep6 "The World Series Defense"
Hero or Hate Crime is probably one of the best episodes in the show.
7:19 - OBJECTION! It's been well established that Charlie cannot read, and "writes" in pictures.
Overruled! The evidence demonstrates that Frank has a basis ( "can read words on a page" ) to say what the document is, not Charlie.
7:19 “can read words on a page”
That’s supposed to be a joke where like “oh obviously, an adult person can read” but at the same time
Like I’m pretty sure Charlie can’t read that.
An person, read obviously can adult oh
The tragic humor at the end with poor Dee having to pay for the car damages is- that in previous episodes of the show, her car or cars she had always in up damaged by the rest of the gang. 😃
Frank was the one driving so he'd be at fault regardless of what Dee was saying. As long as she wasn't touching frank or the car
@@phlpcockrell She did start shouting which is incredibly distracting.
Oh! That explains why she wanted to establish precedent so desperately!
"end" up, not "in" up
10:13
"Alright, I think Charlie's being facetious here..."
Oh, how little you know...
WWLinkMasterX 😂😂😂😂😂 facts he knows nothing about this gang. Especially Charlie.
For a bit of context about why Dee wanted there to be precedent. At this point in the show, the gang has destroyed at least 2 of her cars already.
This channel is a great example of something I had no idea I wanted. I've always been interested in law, but not really enough to go to school for it. I feel like this is a great way for me to passively learn while also getting a good laugh. Doing episodes on It's Always Sunny was a great call. The show has a huge audience and people like me found the channel because of the subject matter of the episode. Your editing is great as well. Huge props to this channel. I will be subscribing!
Same! I've seen some episodes of Legal Eagle before, but this one definitely got me to subscribe. The earlier episodes just focused on short scenes from various works. I love these more in depth episodes about one show or movie. Especially when they center around something as entertaining as IASIP.
You should audit a semester of bird law
>Arbitration
You gotta do the lottery ticket episode now.
YES!
yes, that ones awesome and I would love to see his reaction to the bike
Yes next next next
It’s called hero or hate crime and it’s not a court room episode, they get an arbitrator!
@@celia9112 this isnt a court room episode either. It's an arbitration -although it's not an official one- which means he would probably do an actual arbitration episode
"I think charlie is being facetious here..." Oh dear only if you knew charlie.
Orangebike666 hello fellow American.
This, you should vote, me! If you vote me, I am hot.
So do...
I had the exact same thought.
Uhhhh ghouls
“Not touching that one” that’s some good lawyering right there lol
Objection: when Dee talks about precident, she does not say ‘legal precident.’ I think it is reasonable to assume that she wants to set the (non-legal) precident among her (lunk-headed) friends that actions have consequences.
VampByDay it’s pretty ballsy to call someone lunk headed while misspelling precedent
I absolutely agree. SECONDED.
@@Trazynthekleptomaniac69 Ah yes. My one typo made from a cell phone while at a cafe is equal to all the idiocy these people get up to in this episode, let alone the whole of the series. Also, person calling out grade-school level English mistakes forgot to put a period at the end of their sentence so . . . maybe don't judge a person's intellect based on a single error made from one of the most obfuscating written languages of the planet?
FYI, I have a master's degree in Linguistics. Doesn't mean I always spell everything 100% perfect on the internet. No one does.
"Hey, this is interesting! I think they're about to actually be smart!"
*they do something stupid*
"...Oh"
OchaTime that's basically the entire show in a nutshell
Let's make a list of all the sunny episodes with law clips.
- Dennis Gets Divorced (arbitration over properties and the first we see of Uncle Jack's obsession with hand size)
- The Gang Takes Advantage of the Mortgage Crisis (beginning of bird law ppl!! Standard boiler plate, y'all.)
- Paddy's Pub: Home of the Original Kitten Mittens (contract validity after ingestion by the other party? This contract had ink that had been dry for many forknights, mind you. Also, alternative forms of payment for legal services!!)
- The World Series Defense (might be a shorter one, but there's always little clips you can add on for a misc episode! Like the end of The Gang Gets Extreme: Home Makeover Addition, and Dennis and Dee's Mom is Dead)
... I can't think of anymore rn, but please add on if you can!!
Mr. LegalEagle please do more episodes from my favorite show!
ty
My best friend growing up turned out to be almost exactly like Dennis, from the way he talks down to his mannerisms. Even some of his logic, how he thinks so highly of himself, and his outbursts. When I started watching Always Sunny I was freaking out because of how similar they are, it felt like they based the character off of him.
That is very concerning.
But is he a golden god?
@@MrpoopMan8152 he couldn't be, bc im the golden god
That's one way to find out your friend has npd
When the Legal Eagle guy said he shouldn't represent himself ...well yes it's not a good idea but the thing is narcissistic people frequently opt to represent themselves in court so it makes perfect sense for his character. LOL. He's a five star man in his own mind.
Objection: When Charlie is accusing Dennis of having Donkey Brains, the burden of proof is not on Dennis because Dennis is the one being accused. He is not the plaintiff vis-a-vis the Donkey Brains question
I'll allow it
Please do IASIP: hero or hate crime, it involves more arbitration
World Series Defence.......huh.....HUH?
Please do the always sunny episode "hero or hate crime" next please
anon ymous
Yeah that’d be good
anon ymous agree
YES
or the one about who has to wash the dishes
I just heard a lawyer say "donkey brains" like eight times and it got funnier every time LOL
"I hope we get back to the root issue and the original case."
Ahhhh lol. Whenever I start an episode of It's Always Sunny, whatever the first thing in the episode is, is a good indication for what the episode is NOT gonna be about lmao.
You having to repeat "donkey brains" so much brought me so much joy. Thanks!
A Legality Check of Season 12 Episode 6, It's Always Sunny in Philadelphia. "Hero or Hate Crime?" The gang seeks help from a professional arbitrator. It is the final installment to date of legal proceedings in the series.
What about the World Series defense
“That hero cop Mark Fuhrman” has to be one of the funniest lines in the entire series.
Objection! Charlie can't read.
That boy ain’t right
He'll adapt.
Sustained
William Gao "He'll adapt to reading?"
Hey! We'll make an adjustment...to it...and we'll make a tradition out of it :)
"This thing is getting out of hand" should be Sunny's tag line...
Objection! At 21:11, you referred to It’s always sunny in Philadelphia, a 12 season long, regarded by many as the best show of all time, as “a stupid show”. I move to have that subjective comment stricken from the record.
Haha
Got a "haha" on your objection. Great job!
I was horrified when he said that. Clearly one of the best comedic shows on tv.
i don't think he's trying to say that it's not a good show/a bad show? like this is my favorite show but he's valid in calling it stupid bc the gang r stupid..... iasip is morosexual rights!!
I"ll allow it! 😂😂😂😂
Charlie was absolutely *not* being facetious when he immediately switched sides 😂
"Frank has a character for lack of Donkey Brains!"
-LegalEagle 2018
Vote for Frank Reynolds 2020, a politician who won't blast you in the ass.
"Charlie Kelly
Bird Expert
Donkey Amateur" 😂
Cat Enthusiast
Rat Terminator
It’s only fitting to do It’s Always Sunny in Philadelphia S12 E6 Hero or Hate Crime next........
that and The World Series Defense are probably the last remaining episodes with a hint of law in them.
Yes this one.
@@ridespirals Isn't there also the episode with the contracts and the lawyer? Think its the one about the rights to merchandising of Paddy's.
@@MrMongoose221 oh yeah, kitten mittens!
@@MrMongoose221 Wasn't there also something with Hugh Honey and Vic Vinegar? Maybe when Frank was trying to evict a family out of a house he bought? I feel like they have quite a few "legal" episodes. LOL
19:39 Oh No, Not touching that one! ...so I looked it up.
Among the most controversial figures of the Simpson trial was L.A. homicide detective Mark Fuhrman. Responsible for discovering the "bloody glove" at the murder scene, Fuhrman did what the LAPD refused to do to Simpson - he threw the former NFL star in jail.
Although Fuhrman denied ever having racist tendencies or using the n-word, a taped interview he had chosen to do 10 years earlier revealed otherwise. In the recording, he was quoted as saying to incarcerated Black people: "You do what you're told, understand, n-word?"
This is just your standard boiler-plate lawyerings.
Manuel M We’re all hungry. We’ll get to out hot plates soon.
Not quite, because it's 'cereal bowl' lawyering
Filibuster
@@AlexiLaihoFan do you?.... know what.. that word means..?
Objection!
You can't say that Sunny is improving when this episode aired prior to the episode referenced in your last video.
JeffGraw This past season was top notch!!
What an oddly specific channel. I'm so glad I found it
RUclips is littered with this content
Proper Plank like who? I’d love to watch more! Ik of Dr Mike who makes similar content but mostly to do with Medical stuff.
"Like they did to that hero cop, Mark Fuhrman." I love his reaction.
I think about this episode everytime i eat cereal while driving
...And how often is that, exactly?
I have eaten cereal and driven many times. And when this episode came out I laughed so hard.
DISTRACTED DRIVING!
Washington State distracted driving law allows for eating, but if you get pulled over for a distracted driving citation you could get penalized for eating. But WA State allows for cereal and other items to be eaten while driving. :)
Barry Freed • I prefer salad while driving.
"I think Charlie is being facetious here.."
No, no he is not.
This guy looks like Charlie Day and John Krasinski's kid
To be honest he looks exactly like Billy eichner
@anarchy 1408 no he doesn’t.
@@Zack29810 he does to me
@@Zack29810 he reminds me of ryan reynolds for some reason
Mikey Carrero
Maybe because the case is Reynolds v Reynolds.
4:45 - Mac's proud little "Yeh 😀"
Genuine question: Do you wear pants during these videos?
In one video he should stand up and walk off camera wearing only the top half of a suit
@@Aweedproductions wouldn't that be epic
Of course he's wearing pants. It's the bunny slippers he's hiding ^^
No. He has no legs
It depends on if he was driving while eating a bowl of cereal on his way to record this video. If he was, then no pants most likely
Can you just only do It’s Always Sunny from now on.
This is a great episode, if only for the brilliant Mac evolution bit.
McPoyle was also hilarious, but this was shockingly accurate (though they may have gotten everything intentionally wrong in McPoyle).
That is one of my favorite moments in it's Always Sunny.
That fact that LegalEagle said anything about Always Sunny is accurate makes me fear for humanity!
What makes this show funny is how everything occurs in an absurdly incongruous environment.
In the Bird Law episode, a funny, unrealistic, family drama is taking place in an actual courtroom, and in this episode, a much more realistic, trial-like proceeding is taking place in a bar.