Leica Q3 43 First Look with Nick Rains.
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 24 ноя 2024
- Photographer Nick Rains has been up in the north once more, this time to Canada and Alaska. This is his impression of the long desired Q3 model with almost a standard lens - an APO-Summicron 43mm instead of the highly regarded Summilux 28mm.
The USB microphone feature described in this video has been unavoidably delayed and a new firmware including this feature should be out in October.
Instead of….. “hey, it’s a Leica!”……all you need is..”hey, it has an APO lens!”…the side by side 75mm photo done with both the 3 and the 43 really showed the difference in the lenses of each…… well done as usual Mr. Rains……. Thank you
I got mine the day before yesterday (Sept 26th) the day it was presented officially, I actually own one of the first few in my country. I already love it very much, complements the Q2 28 I also have. For sports, wildlife, etc. I use my Nikons (much, much faster AF), but for street the Q3 43 is unbeatable. The lens is breathtakingly good!
Another brilliant video, Nick. Looks great (bar the grey, black and red colour scheme of course!)
Nice video. Since I often find myself cropping my Q3 28mm images, this camera will be my go to FF, AF light weight travel camera along with the 28mm Q3.
Thanks Nick, your reviews are superb! I loved the comparison of both Q3 cameras, I have a Q3 and a Q2M and was very interested to see similar images shot from the 28 and 43mm perspective. Like you, I bounce back and forth from 35 to 50 with my M11, I think about what images I intend to make and my surroundings before I head out and usually grab one or the other, rarely both. I am very intrigued by the new Q3 43, I guess I’ll have to add my name to the waitlist!
I have mine Q3 43 since 1 week and will use it next week on my first vacation first time intensively.
Thanks for showing that differences between older and current version. I was really thinking if it’s a mistake to choose 43 version over the wider one. But now I am confident with my choice.
Glad I could help!
I'm stunned with my Leica Q quality, it's almost hard to imagine how good the Q3 sensor is 😍
Totally agree!
Thanks Nick. I love the original Q3 and have found the 28mm focal length great for travel. I’ve looked at a few other reviews and am considering the new Q3 43. Wish I could have both, but have to weigh the advantages of one other the other.
Great video Nick, I can see how much you are liking the focal length. 43mm sits so well as a walk around lens, sometimes 50mm is too tight and I often find 35mm a bit too wide.
Totally agree
I like Nick's Videos, very smooth and his voice is soothing . I think buying the q3 for wider shots and q3 43 for everything else is too much - many will get one due to price and not having 2 carry 2 when they are not sure of focal lengths required while traveling and for family pictures . I have a 50 mm on a mirrorless and sometimes it is not wide enough and unable to move back due to boundary limitations etc but with the q3 you can crop for > 28 mm shots and still have decent resolution pics .Having said that , my pick would be 43 due to better perspective for portraits . Now a q4 with a 28-43 f2 lens would be a dream :)
Thoroughly enjoyed the review Nick. I may pick one up in a year or so once the used ones start popping up in the market. I think that 43mm will be off putting to many people, much like lukewarm tea, as it is neither wide nor telephoto. For me it would be ideal and something I would definitely use as autofocus is becoming a must as my eyes age.
wow, I just got my 28mm yesterday. Wish i knew this was coming.
All this advertisement of the 43 from those who really loved the 28mm.. thats like changing your beloved fotball team half way through the season..
Great info. That is a 4 Real Camera. Like the way you explain about the camera
Thanks for watching
I appreciated the justification of the focal length, citing Cartier-Bresson’s aperçu of natural perspective.
Love the review thank you so much, I was waiting this camera for ages (I was hoping for 50mm). Said that I am a bit upset to see I cannot attach a filter with the provided lens hood. This is not acceptable, who cares if Q3 43 and Q3 28 have the same dimensions, I want a function tool. Second there is no battery charger provided in the box. I do need 2 batteries, while charging one I want to be able to use my camera. Last but not least why change the color of the classic black leatherette? I do not like it at all. Leica is selling Q3 43 for way more money than Q3 28 but giving us no essential accessories I am really disappointed, said that yes if I can find one I will buy it. I hope Leica send an updated lens hood for Q3 43 that will fit a filter and a free charger to apologize for it stinginess... (This is the case in USA I do not know about other countries, if the packaging is different.)
I had a feeling you'd like the 43mm focal length Nick. :)
I love the Q3 and plan to say goodbye to my Canon gear and get the 43.
My go to guy for leica related products
APO lens quality opens a lot of more options provided by the Q3 43 for both, film and cinema
When is a proper super slim filter that will work with the square hood will come out?
Excellent perspective on the Q43. As a brand new owner of my first Leica ( a Q2 Mono), wondering if this camera or an SL3 should be my next? Nice things to ponder.
If you need the SL3 to have great autofocus I would skip it. I really like the SL3 as a slow/no action camera. But...the interchangeable lens piece is really taken care of by my M bodies. When I absolutely, positively have to get the shot on a moving subject I go to the Canon.
Great analysis, but I stay with Summilux 28mm...!👍👍👍
Wonderful camera overall. But only a single UHS-II SD card slot in a camera at this price point in 2024 is a glaring omission, IMHO.
What about dji mics , I have invested a lot on the dji mic system. I hope this is something that can be adapted. Thanks for review I have and love the Q3 , for now will dream of the Q3 43 😂
Thank you, great video. Question: will you offer the Leica Q3 43 with black leatherette (or is there a way to get this change done at Leica)? I really dislike this grey.
Another great video, Nick. Appreciate your detailed overview and personal comments. Just a question about the original Q3. Is a firmware update forthcoming to add video output the usb c jack? Thanks
Not that I know of
K|Just put mine on order. Are you going to do a setup tutorial as you did previously
The menus are the same as the Q3 so no need for a seperate set up video.
When will it be available in AUstralia ?
Hi Nick great video. Does the new 43 have a macro function?
Yes it does
Great video Nick. How do you think the lens compares with the 35mm and 50mm SL APO lenses?
I think you'd have trouble telling them apart.
UK here.
Ordered.
Ideally it would be Q3, Q3 43 and Q3 90 😀. I think that is what Leica wants. Buying one Q is a stretch, let alone two.
If Leica made a Q camera with a zoom lens, say 28 to 70mm, it would be a real winner
The D-Lux 8 is that camera, just with a micro 4/3rds sensor.
To put a zoom on the Q3 body form would mean it would have to be a very slow (f4) aperture otherwise the size advantage would be lost. If you want a small(ish) camera with a tiny zoom, try a TL 18-56 on an SL3. Way better than you'd imagine.
Hi there! I am a Q3 user desperate to get a mic that will help me to record audio while I do some video interviews!
Couple questions:
1. When will the Q3 get the firmware update you mentioned?
2. Do you know which RODE microphones will be compatible with the Q3?
Thanks!
I was told the f/w update was due in October. And the mics are the Wireless mics and VideoMic Go2. These have the necessary USB output connections (as well as 3.5mm jacks).
What's delivery?
What is the delivery?
Hi Nick, is there any explanation why Leica decided that it is not possible to use a filter with the supplied square lens hood?
To correctly shade the lens for the 43mm focal length so as to maximise contrast, the hood needs to be a certain size and there is not enough space between the lens front and the back of the rectangular hood shroud.
You can remove the hood and replace it with the supplied lens ring to cover the exposed threads. Then 49mm filters can be fitted as usual. You can then add one of the accessory hoods to this combination.
How does this camera do in black and white...wonder if they will make a Q3 43 Mono hehe
I have no knowledge of this, but it sounds like a nice idea!
Unpopular opinion: The new Leica Q3/43 patent of Panasonic / Japan optics, housing and assembly Portugal, price "Wetzlar", i feel a bit fooled.
I have the Q3 and really like 35mm. This focal length is interesting! But I think that grey colour is ugly, and the black version looks way better!
Q3M 43 please
When will we see a Leica "Q" Camera with Leica M-mount ??
That's called an SL3. Same sensor, takes M lenses via adapter. Image stabiliser but no AF of course.
@@LeicaCameraAustralia NO, much too big, a much better and cheaper alternative to a SL3 are the Sony A7RV which are better than SL3 ! AND the SAME Sony sensor !
With the Q3 28mm f1,7 60mp a crop down to 43mm will give very similar results as a 43mm f2. Leica should focus more on size imo the D-lux 8 have a horrible zoom lens the Q3 versions have big lenses. I would love a Qmini or call it a digital minilux.
A RUclipsr is suggesting that with a filter and lens good on it is not possible to go into Macro mode; because the filter is stopped by the lens hood. Will a Leica filter avoid that problem?
Yes. The lens hood is much shallower and, unlike the hood on the Q3, it has a rectangular light baffle. When changing to macro mode the front element of the lens moves forward and there is no room for a filter. I have no knowledge of whether Leica will address this by making a low profile filter. Personally, I don't use filters, but I know some people do.
The other lens hoods for the Q cameras will accomodate a 49 mm filter.
leica-store.com.au/products/19657
@@LeicaCameraAustralia Thank you Nick. I know, technically, that one shouldn’t use a filter for protection ~ but I am not wealthy enough to be able to easily afford a new front element. Have you had scratches develop on your lenses?
Another question: is dust able to work its way in to the rear element of the lens? Without the ability to remove the lens that could be an issue?
I am still using my M9 and M8 but by eyes are not as good as they were and the Q3 43 might just be the answer.
I like to listen to your very well presented videos and it pleases me to see that your own photos are so good as well! Well done.
No, not any problems with scratches. And dust is way less of an issue than people think. You can actually have a surprising amount of dust in a lens and never see any difference in the results. It looks terrible, but affects the optical quality much less than you think.
Having said that, as far as I know, I have never had dust in or behind the lenses of my Qs over the years. The IP52 weather sealing certainly helps in that regard.
Why not make the camera for interchangeable lenses .. and save the environment :)
Leica offers the M11 and SL3 which have interchangeable lenses.
what about night photography please
Same night photography characteristics as SL3, M11 and Q3. Same sensor.
Anyone else a tiny bit amused/horrified by the focus points at 7:30? lol
Sad for the SL line with two Q cameras 28 & 43 mm I don’t need to carry more gear with me even for professional use they will be lighter to carry than the SL with many lenses.
My Q's supplement, not replace my SL3's. To many lens options in the SL system for the Q's to be a threat.
my Q3 will often go to video spontaneously and can shoot many shots before I realize and loose much. very, very, annoying and others apparently have similar problem. A real turn off since most modern cameras produce great pics. Needless to say, not good for leica to have this problem in 6k point and shoot camera.
It's most likely that you are accidently pressing the default custom button (to the right of the Crop tool button) to switch to video mode, you can assign that function to another button, or remove it totally.
Oh dear, oh dear! Perspective has absolutely nothing to do with the focal length of the lens. Its purely distance to subject that governs the perspective.
That is true. However, to maintain the same framing (i.e. same subject size within the frame) with a different focal length, your subject distance must change. Therefore with a different subject distance, as you say, the perspective must change too.
@@LeicaCameraAustralia Thank you for your reply. I feel privileged to get one from you. Your are right about the faming, and had a nice demonstration in the video, but the point I was making is that it was the moving of the camera that changed the perspective. Take your stunning picture within Sacre Coeur on the 43. You can achieve the same framing on the 28 taken from the same place by appropriate cropping - and both will have the same perspective. Thank you again.
Lopez Thomas Clark Linda Walker Lisa
Just another consumer item.