Absolutely not. Kiksuya and his scenes with Maeve and Bernard in season 2 were extraordinary, let alone the James Delos plotline, were one of the best I’ve ever seen.
If Ford died then Ford won, he had managed to make a conscious being using his and Arnold's theory of the Bicameral Mind, that by giving the Hosts an "inner voice" they could "bootstrap" consciousness. "Wyatt" was Dolores' inner voice, the driving force for her to become conscious.
@@Delosian Funny thing is that the inner voice is simply an effect not the cause. The cause is intent which is even more mysterious than the voice itself because it is its creator. The inner voice is a lie we tell ourselves to keep us human. It is the last door, the last testament of our humanity. When a human becomes truly silent and the inner voice dissapears he is no longer human. He is God. The show almost got the right answer, almost.
"I have touched vs I am touching...." But, what if it is a condition that could be broken, and the result would be still "I am touching"... The maintainer and creator of the split, who is it(that is the nature)? And most importantly without the split is it still the same... my guess split is found one way or another, though it is two different paths. He drove Arnold mad, and spent lots of time trying to understand the nature, looking for him, on the other hand, alternative path would be Arnold's spirit that haunts for even more time than that...
Both "I have touched" and "I am touching" are in the painting!!! The one with the brain in the background is the one that "have already touched"; how come this part is still able to do the touching in the present with someone who is doing it for the first time? Is there a difference in perception as well as perspective? Clearly there is wrath the one that is on top, on the other hand there is resentment in a form of condescendence the one that is on the bottom. Those parts are the split, they are conflicting to exist at once within one person. It gives a clue about how the person perceives time, specifically how time influences the person's perception.
![[Westworld] Ford just wants to tell his stories](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/jF8-cDL-Brg/mqdefault.jpg)
![[Westworld] Ford just wants to tell his stories](/img/tr.png)
Jesus, the background score,Sir Anthony Hopkins's dialogue's on philosophy and existentialism, the plot....this series should have ended at season 2.
Absolutely not. Kiksuya and his scenes with Maeve and Bernard in season 2 were extraordinary, let alone the James Delos plotline, were one of the best I’ve ever seen.
@@עידוכסלוseason 2 loses its footing in a few places but still has some of the best moments in the series. Seasons 1 and 2 are a masterpiece.
He walked into his own assassination with acceptance and didn't even flinch.
If Ford died then Ford won, he had managed to make a conscious being using his and Arnold's theory of the Bicameral Mind, that by giving the Hosts an "inner voice" they could "bootstrap" consciousness. "Wyatt" was Dolores' inner voice, the driving force for her to become conscious.
@@Delosian Funny thing is that the inner voice is simply an effect not the cause.
The cause is intent which is even more mysterious than the voice itself because it is its creator.
The inner voice is a lie we tell ourselves to keep us human. It is the last door, the last testament of our humanity.
When a human becomes truly silent and the inner voice dissapears he is no longer human. He is God.
The show almost got the right answer, almost.
or maybe not
Wow. A little gem
"I have touched vs I am touching...." But, what if it is a condition that could be broken, and the result would be still "I am touching"... The maintainer and creator of the split, who is it(that is the nature)? And most importantly without the split is it still the same... my guess split is found one way or another, though it is two different paths. He drove Arnold mad, and spent lots of time trying to understand the nature, looking for him, on the other hand, alternative path would be Arnold's spirit that haunts for even more time than that...
Both "I have touched" and "I am touching" are in the painting!!! The one with the brain in the background is the one that "have already touched"; how come this part is still able to do the touching in the present with someone who is doing it for the first time? Is there a difference in perception as well as perspective? Clearly there is wrath the one that is on top, on the other hand there is resentment in a form of condescendence the one that is on the bottom. Those parts are the split, they are conflicting to exist at once within one person. It gives a clue about how the person perceives time, specifically how time influences the person's perception.
Buridan's donkey is to be IN the split.
fake 1080p 60fps
reported
Such a hero, thanks for getting the video taken down with your massive influence
Shameless New Age rhetoric, fair enough.
Lol an angry fundamentalist stuck in the bronze age.