I have not seen this before now. My sister's office was where the nose of the plane went in. My solace is that she probably did not know what happened. Thanks for a terrific animation.
Ah man, I’m so sorry. At least it was a quick death may she rest in piece and her memory never forgotten as with the many who lost their lives or were injured during the attack.
It’s disturbing to think there were people in that plane, and people right there at their desks, that were either crushed or incinerated or both. The ones who died instantly were spared the horror, despair, injury and pain of those who survived, only to die in the collapse.
Based on a couple of witnesses that were near the buildings after the first plane hit, there were body parts littered around the grounds. They go into a little bit of detail about it in the Nat Geo docuseries on 9/11. It sounds to me like the wings sent a lot of people flying, many in pieces, down to the ground from the upper floors. I would've much rather have gone instantly on impact than be stuck above or around the impact site(s).
@@BryanClark-gk6ie - There was the one story of a young woman, just got to work, did a pregnancy test, it was positive. She was at her desk in the North Tower, telling her husband the good news over the phone. She must have seen the plane barreling toward her, screamed OMG, and the line went dead. Sickening. Her name was Patricia A. Massari age 25. She worked for Marsh & McLennan on the 98th floor of the North Tower.
There are videos of people who God only knows survived the impact zone, standing on the very edge of the torn and mangled building with fire all around them...some where till it collapsed, so sad for families who identified there loved one by the clothes worn & seen on the images
I can't actually believe that I'm reading people comment that its impossible for aluminum to penetrate steel as if the plane should have bounced off the exterior of the building. Apparently they don't understand kinetics or shearing force. I imagine if this was a steel plane crashing into an aluminum building they would expect an intact plane to have popped out the other end and kept on flying.
+Jeff L A lump of aluminum at sufficient velocity could turn NYC into an irradiated crater. Ignoring high-relativistic impact, jet airliners move *fast*, and regardless of what they're made of, weigh many tons. That much mass doesn't give fucks about whether it's iron or compressed feathers, if it's moving at ~300MPH, it'll blow holes in shit. I'm not saying all the damage to the World Trade Center was caused by the planes alone, but hey.
i don't think for myself because I typed in caps, infallible sheep logic. Uses my own term of sheep against me, can't come up with his own thoughts. You are just a filter for other people's thoughts to be re-projected out onto others. You have probably managed to live your entire life thus far without a truly original thought crossing your tiny mind. I very much doubt you are a real person.
Sheeple Herder And yet you still haven't provided an actual argument for your side of the debate. Insulting people and screaming in all caps- Which is considered by intelligent citizens of the internet to be a sign of idiocy, and regardless of your actual intelligence, causes people to dismiss you as a random angry idiot -doesn't constitute a sound explanation.
I did,I lost my brother Kohn M Rigo at the WTC in NYC. He was working for Marsh in the self insured group at the time. I think about my brother John every day and still I miss him. FYI - I pray for all the folks murdered on 09:11 and their families and friends .☮️✝️☮️✝️☮️✝️
Well if you want revenge. Know who the perpetrators are. For a critically thinking individual This should be enough evidence to prove beyond a doubt that SATANIC ( 33RD DEGREE ) MASONIC/ILLUMINATI. CONTROL OUR GOVERNMENTS AND THE WORLD. They are Corrupt, evil and very, very Symbolic. Our entire history was literally manufactured. You can fake alot of things but dates of large documented events proves very difficult. Like we should all be able to agree that the TWIN TOWERS fell on 9/11/2001 correct? So I don't expect anyone to just believe anything I say . MY HOPE IS THAT EVERYONE WOULD DO THEIR OWN RESEARCH AND TRY TO PROVE THE INFORMATION WRONG. This is just a small example OF 33RD degree symbolism. ⬇️ .................................... One big MASONIC symbol is the square and compass flanked by Pillars, representing the Roman numerals IXXI wich is 911. The US emergency #911 was adopted in 1968. 1968+33=2001 The WTC broke ground in 1968. And fell 33YRS later in 2001. The OWNER of the WTC complex was David Rockefeller. He was on the cover of Newsweek on 4/3/1967. 43🔄34+1967=2001. In the picture he was Overlooking NYC at the future sight of the TWIN TOWERS. The hands on his watch were at 9 and 11. The Pentagon broke ground on 9/11/1941 and was Nicknamed ground zero. Exactly 60yrs later both locations were hit. And the N.name was transferred to the site of the WTC. The first president to publicly mention the coming of the NEW WORLD ORDER was George Bush sr in a speech on 9/11/1990 exactly 11 before the TWIN TOWERS fell. The USS NEW YORK was built with Recycled steel from the WTC. The original USS NEW YORK was commissioned on 9/11/1911 and was Decommissioned in a supposed nuclear test. The ILLUMINATI was supposedly founded in 1776. The ONE WORLD TRADE CENTER that replaced the TWIN TOWERS is 1,776ft tall earning it the N.name freedom tower. THE observation deck is on the 68th floor. 6+3=9 8+3=11 1968 BBC short film called NEWS BENDERS. media lies creates news 5 years in advance to scare the masses to sway public opinion and move money faster. (Good watch) 30 min . WW1 Start Date: 07/28/1914 07+28+19+14= 68. WW2 Start Date: 09/01/1939 09+01+19+39= 68. RUSS/UKRAINE aka WW3 Start Date: 02/24/2022 02+24+20+22= 68. 6 + 3=9 8 + 3=11 The MAYAN CALENDAR ended on 12/21/2012 according to the gregorian calendar that we currently use. we didn't start using until the mid 1500s. If you use the ETHIOPIAN CALENDAR that is much OLDER and also mentioned in the bible multiple times. It changes the Mayan end date to 12/31/2019. The day NIH declared C-19 a pandemic. also NEW YEARS EVE 2020. hindsight is 20/20 is reference to year and clear vision. ETHIOPIAN NEW YEARS DAY is not 01/01...its 9/11. Revelation 9:11 Is about ABADDON/ APOLLION the angel of the Bottomless pit. Look up pics Depicting ABADDON /APOLLION. Look up( IS TRUMP APOLLION) You'll find a book titled TRUMP, ABADDON AND OBAMA. Suggesting that Trump is ABADDON sent to defeat satans Army. suggesting that Obama is SATAN. I know it sounds batshit crazy. BUT? There are photos of Obama dressed as SATAN and nobody else is in costume. The cover of the Economist magazine 12/22/2012 was a cartoon Depicting the 7 Deadly sins. Bankers are on a train labeled greed. Obama is in a rowboat labeled pride. Wich was satans sin. if you spell Obama's daughter's names backwards Take out the word ALAH it spells I AM SATAN. AILAM AHSATAN MALIA NATASHA There is a video clip of Netanyahu with Obama. Netanyahu refers to Obama as big Satan and Israel as little Satan. Luke 10:18 kjv I saw SATAN fall from heaven like lightning..... ( Lightning, Fall from high ) Hebrew translation Barac bama. A FESTIVAL in Italy called CARNIVAL de VIAREGIO. Has 150FT Trump float dressed as ABADDON. NO OPINIONS All facts. You can decide what it all means. But in my opinion if you believe it means nothing. Then you're brainwashed AF. If you have anything to add or you think I got something wrong please feel free to comment 🙏☮❤✝️🌐
I was a tourist that day visiting NYC - my third time there at the time. I really wanted to go to the top of the twin towers and we had tried to go the previous weekend but it was full. We were supposed to go on tuesday but my family decided last minute we would go to empire state instead and visit the WTC later in the day. While we were getting ready to head out that tuesday morning, we all found ourselves glued to the TV in our hotel watching the horrible images. What a scary time, I was just 13 and couldn't believe it was real.
Mad that everyone’s got some kind of spin on a story that they were meant to be there and something magically kept them from going. Also, if you were there, as in in New York, what were you watching on TV in your hotel for? Surely you could have just looked outside?
Give them time, they have to wait several decades before they ever do anything else that involves the gubmint murdering AmeriKKKan citizens to start another war. This was worse than Pearl Harbor where they watched people die at the hands of a foreign nation to jump into a war, this time they actually murdered their own people to jump into a war that wasn't even connected to the people they said committed the act, LOLZ.
Didn't look at the date until I saw this comment lol, I was gonna say what's with the terrible physics with minecraft graphics? Now it makes sense. Would be nice if this was remade now.
There’s one guy I heard somewhere that watched the plane come directly at him and he was under the wing that was higher and survived. I think he still might be alive.
@@princesselani340 yes, if only they hadn't been political hostages of the u.s. gov't which at that time was controlled at a certain level by the neocons. But they didn't make it happen. The real power on this planet doesn't permit doofuses like them to have direct access to the real technology. The people who brought the buildings down were the same people who wanted to bring them down legally and were refused the right to do a controlled demolition. In order to not pay so much as it would have cost to disassemble the buildings, they blew them up with unknown technology. Let them give a signal to others in other countries that they have this technology, and let them remove all of our pseudo freedoms that we thought we had. Two stones with one bird.
I'm more like Imagining that day. What it was like on that plane. Remembering Watching these planes hit the towers on tv and everyone scared and confusing. I went to work but no one did any work. We were glued to the tvs. America was under attack and wondered what planes have terrorist on them and what are they hitting next? The most disturbing part was when you could see people committing suicide before the building collapsed and thinking what would I have done?
I love how people are so possessed by the delusion that airplane wings are “flimsy” or “paper thin.” Airplane wings are extremely strong and can support several times the plane’s weight. I don’t know the rating of 767 wings, but some plane wings are rated at 12 times the plane’s weight. Have you seen a stress test? The wings can bend fully vertical and they don’t break. Also this notion that planes are built like soda cans? The aluminum they use is usually 6061 or 7075. Both of them are high quality and very very strong, and are also, you know, NOT the only metals they use… like, they have titanium and steel parts too, guys. Planes are friggin strong.
I’m a former New Yorker, I worked on Wall St. when they were being built. I was 53 when they collapsed, in court, sentencing a murderer to prison. I will never forget that day. Our family lost several people, three were relatives, the rest were friends. It still feels like it happened yesterday.
One story was a young wife went to work, purchased a pregnancy test on the way, took the test….it was positive. She was by the window in her office in the tower, on the phone with her elated husband, telling him they were going to be parents……..in seconds she screamed…..he could hear the loud roar of a plane drown out the call and then nothing. Heartbreaking.
The facade of the building was 14 inch steel box beams, these box beams were built from approximately 2"-2.5" inch thick steel. I understand the physics involved when two objects collide at high speed. I am a FAA LICENSED AIRFRAME AND POWERPLANT TECHNICIAN, I'm very familiar with the construction of these aircraft. Everyone thinks that a big airplane must be built out of fairly substantial materials, their not, they are engineering marvels because of their amazing strenghth, yet extremely light weight, and minimal materials, the problem that I have is, even at the velocity this jet was traveling I find it hard to believe that the wings, from the out board side of the engine nacelles, to the winglets on the tips, would have enough mass, even at that velocity, to cut a near perfect silhouette of the airplane through the 14 inch square box beam, built out of between 2 inch-2.5 inch thick steel plate, facade on the faces of the building !
You may be an FAA A&P certified mechanic...doesn't make you expert in physics or metallurgy. To think you actually believe you know more than the 'SCIENTISTS' who developed this.
@@jamesw71 literally shut up dude. The plane would have disintegrated against such metal objects almost like hitting a wall. No way it would bring the building down, multiple reports were of explosions that day both in basement (wait, wasn’t the impact on the 70th floor?) yeah I say bullshit. Oh, and a full building 7 collapse without ANY impact?
Sadly, here we are 22 years later and people still have their heads in the sand. Anyone with a bit of common sense would question the official story, considering the amount of wars that were then supposedly justified by this "terrorist attack" on American "freedoms".
Not really, full of physics violations like all the airplane parts being indestructible after breaching the wall, and never slowing down even when hitting other objects, and even no gravity! So Purdue violates the conservation of energy, equal and opposite forces, and even that gravity exists, with parts floating UP at the end and traveling a straight line without arcing towards the Earth. The Bugs Bunny Road Runner show was more accurate. p.s. As a bonus, some parts just vanish when hit, violating that matter can't be destroyed.....
@@anthonywilliams7052 how are you dealing with being in a world where most people are either stupid or refuse to believe their own eyes and ears? I'm finding it stressful.
@@lebergerdesphotons4565 It isn't fun sometimes but I've found that more and more people are paying more attention and more open-minded in general than 5 or 10 years ago. Also, many more people fighting back, exposing the craziness all over. That goes for 9/11 and the craziness going on in the world now. More and more people are finally speaking up. Don't let the media convince you otherwise. Better yet, don't watch any TV. I go to thrift stores sometimes and talk to other people, mention the crazy things in the media and almost always several other people will speak up. Be the first to say things and watch how fast people speak up and see there are many people that feel just like we do. We just need to organize, protest, expose the other side every way possible. Use their tactics against them like calling their financers and ask if they support things like the 173 segregated college or rheysyst things taught there now. Many new media or more popular media too like Epoch Times too. The far-left is only about 8% but they are taught to be very active and get a lot of financing and paid protesters too. We just need to organize and fight back as much as possible now so it doesn't turn into a Sivel Wore as they want. Support for the left is at record lows now, if not for hacked machines very few would be in office. Check out a channel Salty Cra---cker too (no dashes), see him here and better yet on Ody___see where many channels are moving since there isn't sen so ring. He's pretty funny and you can see where people are fighting back. Like one of my favorite movies said, "never give up, never surrender". p.s. Check the plane's seating charts and the number of passengers, what are the chances most of the planes would barely be about 25% full when they bumped people from planes to keep them at 100%? Search for "911 research seating charts" and see what I mean. I mostly stick to the numbers since they are easier to prove.
@@anthonywilliams7052 well anthony, I sure hope that there are lots more like you out there. I haven't owned a television for 13 years (since the divorce). I noticed one thing which seems important to keep in mind. There is a theory that suggests that there are inanimate, non-alive microscopic particles so small that you have to have a very expensive machine to even have a shadowy image of them. The theory goes on further to suggest that when nobody's looking these not alive particles penetrate the membranes of living cells and take over their reproductive systems and reprogram them temporarily to use them for their own purposes. Has this theory ever been substantiated? I've looked. I'd say somebody would have had to create an experiment which cleverly demonstrates that this is a true fact. The person or persons who'd have managed this would surely have accumulated a nobel prize or two and we'd all know their names. But I can't find any such experiment. So I have to conclude that there is no proof that any virus exists which has these capacities. Since there is no proof of that, I have to conclude that alternative theories are just as valuable. That perhaps particles that look like that are actually molecular debris from our own dying cells or the cells of any of thousands of species of colleague bacteria that my have died in our bodies. The envelope they talk about may be our own cells work. Perhaps our own cells do the equivalent of putting certain debris in a plastic bag of their own creation because it will be easier than breaking this debris down further. Why not? There's no proof of the other theory. So based on some unproven theory, the pharm companies write a bunch of papers which we're all supposed to believe are true. But in every case they are based on this unsustained theory, and therefore are not at all true. Can anybody find peer reviewed papers which show a repeatable experiment which clearly demonstrates the virus theory? I can't and I haven't and I've looked. If you have found such a thing please point me in the right directions so I can see it too. But I think the virus theory is like 911 and the apollo program. It's bullshit which is used to steal money from us all and in this case our health too. However the new technology that we still don't have access to is the technology which turned two giant buildings into microscopic dust particles in a few seconds while we watched. That is real. That could get us to and from the moon inside of the waldorf astoria. we could even bring the swimming pool. And all of the doofuses here refuse to believe in that and they've seen it with their own eyes. I was just looking at misinterpretations of the seismic data from that day. It didn't even mention that there were no s waves and p waves, only surface waves. The waves measured show that suddenly 350,000 tons of weight was removed from the surface. Figures don't lie but liars can figure. Not sure who said that before my mother did, probably somebody famous.
The "high quality" doesn't refer to high definition. Rather, it refers to the detail and accuracy to the physical effects of the crash. They could easily take that same rendering and reanimate it in higher resolution using newer technology.
Like the Original Architect said many times, it’s like a hole puncture into a screen, built with the capability withstand multiple 707 hits which were also wide body aircraft in their day‼️
funniest thing: aircraft was not even shaked while hitting the steel wall, not slowed down, nothing bent, cracked or broke away, just sliding in as if it is a computer animation is, same like this video.
Yamasaki said nothing of the sort. The person who made this statement was the engineer in charge if the construction after the 93 bombing. He was not involved with the original design and not qualified to make such a statement.
The only thing I find funny about this (from a 2021 standpoint) is how he keeps reiterating that it's a state of the art animation system. My, we've come a long way. Edit: how are there 62 replies on this thing already
We? You mean scientists cause they ain't a damn thing 99% of people have done to better science. This is like taking credit for something you didn't do.
@@midsizesedan7620 scientists don't make these , they have 3D artists and programmers make sims But ig scientists provide the math for realistic physics
the very same day there was a simulation of exactly the sort of attack which actually happened. The only difference between the simulation and the attack was that the simulation invoked (fake) airplanes. The attack had no airplanes. Only the belief of airplanes. Because 99% of americans believe the TV more completely than they believe their own senses.
@@lebergerdesphotons4565 and as for the people in New York who used their visual senses to watch the horrifying scene of a pair of planes hitting two of the most iconic buildings on the planet?
@@NaenaeGaming show me their statements. I don't believe it happened that way and that looking at their statements will show that to be the case. send me a link.
You probably would be better off with something like a hang glider type of device rather than a parachute. At just fifteen stories, a parachute would probably not have enough time to deploy properly and do much to slow you down. Just a thought.
Helot Djut LOL...true. Yet, would you deny others a chance to be able to escape? I don't think you are that type of person. You seem to be a person that truly understands the value of all life.
That was really cool and graphic and at the same time so very sad to see what those people inside would have seen. I know they would not have known what happened. This video was extremely well done and thank you for taking us inside and see what happened. So many years later and it still breaks my heart. Amazing the technology we have.
This does not show at all what happened. Where are the explosions? Not the one from the plane, but the one around the building? Why is this a pro explanation video when REAL scientist say that both thos buildings could have withhold 13 planes each. This was all done from inside.
@@vyros.3234 Meanwhile there are thousands of independent engineers who disagree with the, what was it, a 12 person panel's opinion? Tower 7, which was over 50 stories tall could not have collapsed at those speeds or in that direction under that form of damage. There was minimum fire, the object didn't penetrate that far, and right before it collapsed, you can see flashes of light and the windows popping in a straight line near a structural location on a corner. Their official opinion was "tower 7 collapsed because of fires" -Shyam Sunders which is the guy youre probably referring to in one shape or form. Here is the thing. No jet fuel, and its the first time before or since a metal high rise has ever collapsed from fire. EVER. There have been buildings built half as well burn for over a month and were still standing. Tower 7 was the facility that housed the backup data for government debt. It was destroyed the day after the pentagon stated they couldn't account for 2 trillion dollars. Coincidentally the part of the pentagon that collapsed was the other location that data was stored. There were far too many coincidences during 9/11. Such as the plane that was crashed into a field is the only time weve ever in aviation history that there was nearly zero discernable pieces of the plane or bodies. It's not like we havent had similar if not exact same planes land nose first with more left over. And I never saw anyone like Alex Jones going to court for talking about it, because the government doesn't want to have to defend the evidence. I can tell you haven't invested any real time into it all. Cheers.
I think the people in the floors above the impact zones were basically cooked. A lot jumped, but not everyone needed to. I think some waited. It is horrifying. However that is the story in a high-rise block and uncontrollable fire (like Grenfell tower here in UK).
One thing I find incredible about this simulation is that it utilizes ray tracing, which is something that ONLY in recent years has hardware been able to render in real time. Really neat!
@@mw00295 right but it hasn’t been rendered in real time on consumer hardware until just recently. Prior to 2018 it was not a selling point of gpus, just a rendering method that otherwise took several machines, and days to render out.
@@MealsMedia the video you just watched was most likely not rendered in real time, with each frame taking minutes or even hours to render. Ray tracing has been used in 3d animated movies since their inception. It's not a new technology, and modern games still cheat a lot with Ray tracing, as most of them aren't rendered using full ray tracing (e.g. Global lighting), and only smaller things like mirror reflections are actually Ray traced.
I remember 9/11 like it was yesterday. I was in Florida at the time on holiday with my family from the UK. We had literally just arrived at a Disney waterpark and were told to evacuate. On the radio there was a report of a "small plane going into the WTC". We went back to our villa and switched the TV. I literally could not believe what I was seeing. When the second plane hit the South Tower, I was stunned. It was like watching a movie, but the fact it was reality I was watching was horrifying and hard to grasp. By the time the second tower collapsed, I was in tears. We went out to eat that night and the US people were incredible. Their grit in the face of such a tragedy, their camaraderie and grace with us and their determination to see justice. What also haunts me is that literally an exact year before, I went to New York and had dinner in the beautiful "Windows on the World" restaurant on the 107th floor of the North Tower. I remember my Mum asking me to stand in the window for a photo, but I was too nervous to do so as I don't like heights. To think that so many people were trapped up on those high floors of the towers at those same windows with no option but to remain or jump is horrendous. Just terrifying and awful beyond belief. 9/11 is imprinted on my brain and will never leave me. My heart goes out to everyone who lost their lives, their loved ones and all of the survivors of that terrible, terrible day.
I was only a 1 year old when it happened. But my mum had turned the TV on and was shocked an sickened by what she saw, it was 3 in the afternoon over in the UK at that time.
@@EuanWhitehead you are little older than my son Anders . He was in the womb that morning ( born late Oct 2001) He would flip inside line a dolphin, ( different wife ) none my other 4 children did that . Had birth trauma , he very healthy
Can u imagine being in the building. Looking out and seeing a big ass plane coming right at u. Seeing it blow through the building, dozens of people dying. And then just being stuck up there, unable to leave, eventually falling down with the collapse of the tower
@@robertpatterson3321 As you can see, Bob, your question is still far from being answered four months later. Not surprinsingly, since it's been around for no less than twenty years... The truth is uncomfortable for so many!
It’s called gravity. Here, take a hypothetical case. Say a building is, oh let’s say 1,368 feet tall. Then, let’s say open air sources like National Geographic says the building fell in ten seconds. You need the height of the building and time. The acceleration rate for an object falling through air, so long as the object is on planet earth, is 32 feet per second squared. When you do that for a building that is 1368 feet tall, you come up with 9.222 seconds. Towers 1 and 2 fell in 10 seconds. So the amount of resistance the buildings experienced is the difference between 10 seconds and 9.222 seconds. Not much resistance. Every nut, bolt, connections of every kind, must fail at the same time. So it wasn’t quite thin air with 0.778 seconds of resistance, but close. Remember the Maine? Gulf of Tonkin? Kind of like that but now going for One World, or at least when it comes to trade. Sincerely, Revelation 18:11. They forgot to read or maybe they don’t believe it, but “they” should have heeded Proverbs 15:3. You’ll notice this verse says “eyes” plural. A police state’s god only has “one eye” right HAL 9000? That’s right, Dave. 2001 Space Odyssey. Made in 1968. That’s the year construction began on the Twin Towers and “call 911” was instituted. Coincidence? The God with two eyes knows…..Fight Club was made in 1999. Hope that helps answer your question. Romans4:25, Brian.
The simulation of the crash is impressive. How sad what happened, not only because of the loss of life, but also because of the demolition of the towers. I was 5 years old when it happened, so I don't remember the attack, but I know we were all glued to watching the television. Greetings from Argentina.
The plane, that is virtually made of aluminum, hits the second tower and cuts through a steel and concrete building, in tact, like a knife through butter, no wing or tail damage, but the plane that hits the Pentagon virtually disappears, engines and all, wings collapse, engines disintegrate, no seats, luggage, just disappears. You can't have it both ways and besides, both scenarios defy the laws of physics !
If truthers are scum? What are liars? Fox News? World Trade Center building fell at the rate of gravity. Then NIST tried to deny it. When they were unable to deny it, they simply said that "they would go back to the drawing board on it" . Now, does that mean that they are compliant in the cover-up conspiracy? Let me put it this way. If we woke up in the morning and I was the supreme leader of the world., I would have every member of NIST and their ebntire extended families flown to GITMO. And one by one we would find out everything they know. If they denied the acceleration rate of gravity (and they did) then he'll yes they are in on it. Give me the power to subpoena and to grant immunity and some reward money and I'll bring you the heads of everybody who was in on 911. I'll bet my own head that I won't have a single Arab high jacked in the damn mix anywhere. Then I'd start with the media. And Fox News, including the janitorial staff. Isn't that excessive? Did you see those people jumping from the towers? Nothing is excessive. But, under my plan , not one innocent person would be harmed in any way. But I'd get every one of the guilty
i totally agree with yr synopsis , i think of it this way - lets just say it was the building that was moving @ 500 mph , and the building hits a stationary plain , obviously the building would demolish the far less superior airoplain !! do u live in america friend ??
Very informative, I can't even begin to imagine the horror those people went through on that fateful day, I live in Connecticut and remember driving home just after the second plane hit the tower, and while driving east bound I84, there was a plane embanking like it was turning around, I was thinking to myself is this the next one as I was listening to the radio and just announced a third plane went missing, ( the one that crashed into the Pentagon,) I never felt so scared in all my life. We shall never forget what happened on that day.
@@dianakibbe1885 you saw the detailed aftermath on tv didya? considering that no detailed aftermath was ever televised, i find that unlikely. are you aware as to what rolls-royce's response was when they were asked for engine model details when given whatever details were available about the engine in the wreckage aftermath? btw, i don't merely 'watch the news'.
I was 16 when this happened, during my 2nd Period Health Class Sophomore Year. I was in shock, had no idea what was going on, all assignments were cancelled and TVs were on showing what happened. Still didn’t know until I called my mom when I got home after school, my jaw hit the floor.
We still dont have an idea what was going on. The only thing we know is that the world has gone totally crazy after 9/11. The world is really upsidedown compared on how it was before 9/11.
not a good sign. you saw images on tv and didn't know what you saw until your mommy told you what you saw? And the TV told her what she saw. What's the point of having eyes and a brain?
Like the analogy ... and think I get what you mean; however, I believe this to be an accurate simulation of what went on on that horrific day, albeit it is impossble to simulate the terrible experience of actually having been there ...
It might be extremely morbid but I've always had a big fasciation with seeing exactly what the impact looked like on those floors when the plane directly hit there. Not so much the smoke and carnage aftermath, just the sudden switch from normal to absolute chaos in a split second. And the likelihood that there is a big possibility that a person, or people, were hit directly by a burting apart airplane, when it first entered the building. Was there ever a feeling for them or was it so sudden that they didnt even have a chance to grasp? Also did anyone see the plane through the window right before the crash and try to run just from instinct? There are really a lot of morbid questions I have about 9/11 and I doubt I'm the only one. And unfortunately these questions will never be answered. And as morbid as this might be, I think this is a big difference than when people want to see jumpers hit the ground just for the pure fasciation of watching people die. Or atleast thats what I tell myself.
Just like the old rose said in Titanic movie..in the beginning scenes .... Thanks for your scientific explaination but the experience of it was much different
Can’t imagine how the real experience would’ve been. Being 1,000ft up, next to a burning inferno. When you’re in that position, the last thing you would think about is the scientific process of the impact.
@@onumahobart8832 no there weren't. But the worst of it is that nobody seems to realize that this was a planned attack by the people who have owned the u.s. gov't and every other gov't on earth with the objective of using fear to gain more control over us all. If we would all understand that, we could put an end to it. But the masses don't want to think about it. They don't want to get involved in their own destiny. We are in the process of being wiped out. The only ones likely to survive will be the ones most ready to accept their slavery. It's a sad commentary on the quality of the human soul.
One thing that most analysts neglect to include in the total collapse of the towers is that at the top of each tower was a 30 foot thick solid slab of formed concrete used as a ballast to combat swaying in the wind. It had so much mass that moving it back and forth was nearly impossible. However, once put into downward motion from the collapse of just one weakened floor, the mass of concrete would have nothing to stop it. The second plane was larger and weakened a few floors at a slightly lower level and so that building collapsed much faster. So, the ingenious feature to help stabilize the building in intense winds also helped to hasten its total collapse.
I wasn't aware of the counterweight of that size in the towers, but it doesn't surprise me. I remember watching a summary of the building of the Burj Khalifa, and that has an approximately 400 ft long counterweight structure in the building to counteract oscillations due to wind/quakes.
Imagine sitting in the building, just doing your work facing the window, and the only thing you see is a huge plane hurdling towards you at high speed…
They would have both been the lucky ones instant for them alas the the people above the impact level there the ones that must have gone through hell before meeting there fate
Imagine being in the school on very same day and desperately waiting for this horrific news to come to let u make your own people fool with ur sugar coated words like ''Our country is under terrorist attack''.....r u freakin serious!!!! were u not the super power of the world?? then how could u not were able to stop that from happening. or may be u did want this to happen ,,didnt u ! 😏
In 2005, 4 years after the attack, the government's own National Institute of Standards and Technolegy issued it's report. It stated out of the 236 outer columns 33 were damaged leaving 86% undamaged. NIST estimated 6 to 8 out of 47 core columns were damaged leaving 85% intact and undamaged. That is what's known as Minimal Damage. They found no scientific reason why or how these two towers fell. They also found all materials used, welds,and bolts were above standards and no core column showed a temperature above 250 degrees. NIST never tested for residue from explosives or accelerates. In 2008 Shyam Sunder of the NIST said about building 7 " The phenomenon that was saw on 9/11 that brought this particular building was really thermal expansion that occurs at lower temperatures". Science demands a clear path for structural mass to accelerate at the rate of gravity, except on 9/11. Just what is this lower temp. thermal expansion that allows free fall speed ignoring load bearing continuous vertical support, floors of truss assemblies with carrier beams, lateral crosses, diagonal bracing, tens of thousands of welds and bolts, interior walls and partitions, office contents, 1 1/2" through 12"cast iron pipe, electric conduit, and all the other utilities to fall at the speed of gravity. If this new 'science' is now a known fact wouldn't we want to condemn all high rise buildings in places like L.A. and Phoenix? And to think there are people that believe this crap.
_"no core column showed a temperature above 250 degrees."_ Here's the full quote. You left out quite a bit there. *"For columns HH and C-80, few areas of paint were observed (three to five spots per column) with no indication of temperatures over 250°C. Note that these core columns represent less than 1 percent of the core columns on floors involved with fire and cannot be considered representative of any other core columns."*
Mark H You speak of truther dishonesty, and yet you state your opinions as fact. The head of NIST has stated that NIST did not test for explosives residue. Your thinking that they did, does not make it so.
IXL2BW _" NIST did not test for explosives residue."_ You didn't read or didn't understand my post. They inspected the steel for failure signs and clues.... They did this at the scrap yards.... this would have included the EXTREMELY OBVIOUS damage from any explosives destroying the steel.... in fact had there been any damage from explosives it would have been so obvious that it wouldn't have been seen at ground zero when they were pulling it out.
We are not talking about what should have been done, we are talking about what was done or not done. And in this case, like I said before, the top guy at NIST said that they did not test for explosives. Look up the video "explosive evidence" and see for yourself. Your claims are not fact, only opinion.
It is very easy to make a graphical animation, what is difficult is an experimental demonstration. I can't imagine how the aluminum shell of a hollow tube could cut through steel columns as if they were made of cardboard.
@@jarebb1 It's not a hollow tube. It's actually well reinforced with structural ribs (kinda like a honeycomb). I do believe with enough velocity, the aluminum would be able to break through the steel. However, it is not possible to have damaged the entire foundational structure that would be needed to cause the building to collapse upon itself.
It is a finite element analysis simulation. FEA does consider the forces and material properties and forces involved. The "graphical animation" is meerly the output of the numerical simulation.
@pippa3150, Apparently you did, or at least all New Yorkers did, years later they actually selected a Muslim, and turned tail and ran leaving billions in weapons to the enemy. Do you even know who the enemy was? Why did we attack two countries that had nothing to do with 9-11, so yes you forgot everything. Maybe you didn't even know to begin with what the real truth is. You should stop watching the criminal media for starters.
I agree, especially in that manner. I really wanted to see an analysis of everything provided, how hot the beams would have been at the core for it to completely fold in on itself. I would think hot steel beams would just bend and if anything maybe it would come down at an angle not just completely disintegrate straight down..
especially when other planes hit other building before and never took them down. also buildings burned for hours and days and still never fell. these buildings fell as like it was with controlled demolition. just look it up on youtube, it's all there to see.
Did you know Osama was actually a structural engineer. Since the building was made out of steel beams with very little concrete, the steel does not have to melt to collapse, once it gets hot because of the fires, the weight above it will make the columns bend. This will cause all the weight above to come down and sort of form a domino effect. Every time a floor falls the total weight that's falling gets bigger, which caused what seemed like a controlled collapse. The attack on the WTC also caused a giant change in skyscraper design, it is the main reason that these kinds of buildings are mostly made out of concrete centers at least
@@NFSGamerful we have seen many buildings burning for hours yet didn't fell, also can you explain why second tower which was hit fell before the first one if burning jet fuel was the reason for core collapse? Tower 1 went down after 45 minutes of burning. And also explain how WC 5 fell which was a bit away from WC 1 and 2 while the building just close by remained intact? Only fools will believe this shit. And btw OBL was not a architect or construction expert. He was millionaire who just inherited the construction business from his father. And his education was in economics and business administration. All the billionaire send their kids for same rather then some technical fields as they know their kids has to run the business, for technicalities they can hire cheap labour...
@@Spooferish, as we havbe seen many buildings fall after burning. Just ready the NIST World Trade Center Disaster Investigation report by yourself. WTC 5 didn't fall but WTC 7. There are several investigations about WTC 7 too. It is important to read them yourself and not blindly follow the opinion of some RUclipsrs. Most of them lie or leave out many details from the official investigation to make their story sound believable. For example, *_none_* of the WTC buildings remained really intact. All of them were badly damaged, most of them so bad that they couldn't be repaired.
Just exactly how did the lower structure weaken when the fire was near the top? If kerosene can melt steel, why do we have welding equipment. Also what caused Building 7 to collapse, it was untouched.
"Just exactly how did the lower structure weaken when the fire was near the top?" -Hundreds of thousands of tons of building fell on it. "Also what caused Building 7 to collapse" -Fire "it was untouched" Wrong. It was struck be debris from the North tower.
On September 11, 2001, the structure was damaged by debris when the nearby North Tower of the World Trade Center collapsed. The debris also ignited fires, which continued to burn throughout the afternoon on lower floors of the building. The building's internal fire suppression system lacked water pressure to fight the fires, and the building collapsed completely at 5:21:10 pm
This does not explain how the central steel structure collapses in free fall motion ie. as if nothing is impeding / stopping the buildings collapse downwards because jet fuel does not burn anywhere hot enough to melt the steel supports or make the steel upright supports soft enough to give way so thoroughly & completely. The jet fuel would’ve quickly burnt up & not stayed hot long enough to have any effect on the buildings steel upright beams surrounding the central core as well as the outside steel frame supports. It just doesn’t make sense. The office & hydrocarbon fuel burns in open air ~500-1500F, yet iron or structural steel requires 2,700&. Then the entire buildings metal structure from top to bottom and from inside to outside need to be hot enough to melt and bend without cracking then to stay at elevated extreme temperatures for nearly one month before it would be cold enough to move to barges & be shipped to China as soon as possible for scrap metal. Then there is the totally separate incident of Building 7 collapsing ~4pm from stray hot particles & “office fires” in a uniform manner as if one unit in complete freefall & no obvious heat !!!!! Hollywood reproduced planes hitting buildings and exploding into flames a couple of times early in the 2016 movie Sully. We know that a lot of advancements of all sorts are withheld from public knowledge for indefinite periods of time. They never want us to know the exact extent of everything they are capable of doing. Yet here they are reproducing the exact same trauma inducing events in plain sight. It is not only possible but something that must be seriously considered especially as the “media” coverage was promoting the exact same long term storyline as events were unfolding. Plus the BBC aired pictures with Building Seven still standing later that day - in clear view - as they “reported” that it had collapsed -- and strangely it did totally collapse soon after and there is still footage of personnel clearing people from the streets & areas around Building Seven just prior to it collapsing from “office fires.”
This model makes no attempt whatsoever to explain building collapse. It covers about 1 second in time. Aircraft impact effects only. Why I should have to explain that I don't know.
@@MFitz12because the conspiracy about building demolition is easy to digest than enough civil engineering knowledge to understand why it’s total bollocks The reality the the buildings design required the exterior frame to be held in place as much as the interior frame needed it: and the once thousands of tons of building started to accelerate down by even a few cm - the inertia was unstoppable. As to melted steel - it didn’t need to melt, it just got soft enough in the floor trusses. The building was rated for a slow 707 on empty, (maybe) not a fully laden 737 doing 500 knots!
Grenfell Tower wasn't hit by a plane with the energy of a ton of TNT, burned primarily externally and was made of reinforced concrete panels. More relevant examples would be Plasco Tower or Wilton Paes de Almeida. People like you always ignore those.
@@Moakmeister No, but the Empire State Building was in the 1940s. Are all the 1000s of structural engineers who say it was a controlled demolition wrong or conspiracy theorists?
Looks like the channel owners deleted my other comment, maybe because someone reported it. This is why the terrorists attacked us because some people want to control what information is available .
@@waynelast1685 no lmao dude you’re being overly paranoid 🤣🤣🤣 RUclips sometimes automatically remove comments if its AI algorithm detects something it deems as inappropriate
@@jamostudios7596 no there was nothing really that bad. RUclips doesn’t remove comments but blocks comments with keywords. There was one woman making crazy comments but still I think we shouldn’t be in the practice of preventing anyone from speaking out even if we think it’s crazy or we don’t like it.
Many of you seem to be missing the point that this is a scientific simulation, this was never expected to look like some kind of Hollywood movie. It's not meant to simply look realistic or "pretty". This was made to better understand the damage and events involved in the collision.
You might think you're crazy for reading this but rest assured that there are many more than the millions of Americans and the 958 links posted here that don't think you're crazy. They think it's about time you got the insight to just look a little more closely at the convenient cavalcade of coincidences and unexplained facts, studies, observations and inconsistencies in the ' Official ' 9/11 story. You might think I'm crazy to suggest that the 9/11 attacks were planned, schemed and executed Black-Ops military exercise disguised as war games, based on a plot perpetrated by the PNAC; copied from Operation Northwoods, and managed by PNAC signator Cheney; who, in an unprecedented move had himself placed solely in charge of five war games exercises involving hijacked planes at the exact same time the WTC attacks were occurring and who had also; three months beforehand, in another unprecedented move been put in charge of all NORAD military responses in the event of any attack though when asked, he lied and claimed it was the President who had to make any decisions about responses; but he was inaccessible; cowering in a room full of 8 year olds and he didn't want to alarm them, ( how conveeenient ) ; and instead of being whisked out of there, he stayed, and stared into space like a stunned rabbit, making nervous jokes, chewing on his lip, tucked away deliberately out of reach of the press; ( yet somehow still managing to put his foot in his mouth ) while people jumped to their deaths from the burning, undefended, WTC Twin Towers. Just ask ONE question. " How did ALL THREE of those buildings just fall more or less straight down, from a paper and office furniture fire; two at freefall speed and the other IN A VACUUM !! ? " Or better yet; " WHY??!! " This page does NOT presume to have answers; rather present material supporting the questions. If you don't feel like reading, just scroll down the list or go to pictures of 9/11 . FIRST read #335. Now let me run my findings by you and see how they settle. Uniform, universal, symmetrical, total collapse at WTC 1, 2 & 7 from fires that were localized and mostly OUT. THIS is a myth; #21 If you see or watch the videos or images of the towers you'll notice that one of them, the south tower had a chunk begin to fall in a huge section, that dissolved before it hit the ground. #13 By the imagery of any prior pancake collapse a large section of this building should have been left in a pile at the bottom, given that it supposedly fell in one piece. However, NO trace of this huge section was even visible after it went into the cloud of dust. "I don't think the current administration has the political capital to pull this off anymore." I don't suppose that $2.3 TRILLION reported missing on 9/10/01 #717 might have been available ? Or $167 BILLION #400 that went missing from the basements after 9/11 ? Or the pallets of cash that vanished in Iraq ? "I don't see how Bush/Cheney could have brought those families into the conspiracy." Can't you imagine ? Look at the passenger manifests. The list of weapons experts, high tech computer guys, retired military all conveniently ' disposed of' so that they can go to their new covert lives as underground covert experts with new identities. Pentagon discrepancies; #25, & #26, #273 can you imagine the absolutely UN-likelihood of the CIA planning an attack on 9/11, as well as five war games being effected of jets crashing into the WTC towers on 9/11 and THEN having it actually HAPPEN ??!! #298 with #896 pdf., #897, #513, #448, #538, #545, #547 And if you haven't looked at any material regarding cell phones in planes; They DO NOT WORK Go to # 372, #909 #928 and about the cell calls by Barbara Olsen ............ ........" Barbara Olson's phone calls are the most suspicious because she supposedly called twice and the person who we have to take their word for that she made these two phone calls is her husband, Ted Olson, who is the United States Solicitor General. Ted was one of the lawyers who successfully represented George W. Bush at the Supreme Court in December 2000, stopping the Florida recounts and guaranteeing Bush the White House victory. He also has admitted to the Supreme Court that the U.S. government lies! So, one has to wonder if Ted Olson was part of the conspiracy and simply lied about her calling him. Also, it was reported that Barbara called Ted collect even though it was reported that she called from a cellphone. Ted Olson claimed that she said the hijackers used boxcutters, which is the only source that the hijackers used them......." AND #340, #329 ( if it doesn't load try ) FBI Admits: No Evidence Links 'Hijackers' to 9-11 #491, #501, #511 South Tower Discrepancies #35, #299 and those " terrorist's ? " ( G.I.'s) #519 passengers, #548 alternate theory, #614 I don't doubt that Muslims hate us. I hate us. The Ugly American is alive and well and living in the hatred of the world, and for this rank and putrid reputation, I hate everyone who lies, cheats, steals or murders for capital gain. BUT you just aren't trying here; 19 Muslims did NOT get onto jets and NOT be on the passenger lists. 9/10 turned up alive, so that proves that anyway. 10 Muslims did NOT shut down NORAD, Cheney did. Three steel re-inforced buildings did NOT fall at 10 floors per second from kerosene ( jet fuel ) fires; they were demolished. A 757 did NOT crash into the Pentagon nor at Shankesville, NOR WTC 7. IF they had, there would have been photos all over the world for years !! THERE ARE no PHOTOS !! Mark Bingham did NOT call his mother from a cell phone on a plane and say to her, " Hi, Mom, this is your son, Mark Bingham " Try to use some investigative intelligence here. And remember; ONE flaw in the Official story deminishes credibility in the ENTIRE story. WHY would the FBI confiscate all the evidence? WHY would the FBI destroy air traffic controller tapes? WHY isn't the FBI even looking for Osama ?
I was there! I visited New York and got into the World Trade Center in 1999, in a hot evening. Almost nobody in the lobby, and I took the elevator to the top floor, to a place called The Greatest Bar on Earth (it´s probably the Windows on the World restaurant). I even remember I got a salmon fish sandwich and fries, and met an Asian lady who was actually German! If you´re reading this please let me know, it would fantastic to find you. Then everybody danced the twist... it was amazing. Cars in the streets were tiny dots down below... I CANNOT IMAGINE FALLING FROM THERE. It is beyond my imagination.
Ive been there too m8, i went there with my girlfriend in January 2000, up in the lift to the 'windows of the world' cafe/restaurant, the lift (elevator) was really fast i remembered...but yh, looking down from up there was pretty scary, i think they had them floor to ceiling windows aswell so it seemed worsre when u looked down.....ive still got a framed panoramic picture of the twin towers and N.Y. up in my living room at home in England.....i watched the t.v. for about 2 days solid when the attack happened.... Love to all the victims of 9/11......peace....🤘🤘❤❤
@@andybennett3736 How great! So cool that you have this picture... at the time there were no cellphone cameras and I didn´t bother enough to bring my SLR Nikon, unfortunately.
Wow, who knew thin sheet aluminum could totally cut through and destroy structural steel and concrete. Airplanes must REALLY be strong. Notice the large hole in the perfect shape of an airplane on the side of the building, this is solid proof how strong they are. I’m sure any aircraft design engineer could corroborate this. It reminds us of the old Roadrunner cartoons when Wiley Coyote would run through solid rock and leave the perfect outline of his body, totally believable. Imagine repurposing airplane wings somehow for high rise building demolition.
Less about object strength and more about speed and weight. The plane was more or less disintegrated on impact. However get any heavy object moving fast enough and you can punch through anything.
You could punch a hole through 12 feet of concrete with a sock if it was moving fast enough. The energy of a moving object is equal to the MASS of that object (not material strength) multiplied by the SQUARE of the velocity. So while aluminum wings are much softer than steel beams, they could absolutely inflict enough damage to sever them at high speeds.
By your logic anything stronger than an aluminum can will deflect a plane hitting it at any given speed. Think before you post. Kudos to the responses above mine.
@@devinpol4258 top comment is what happens when people who don't understand physics try to wax poetic on physics. I'm an idiot and even I know there is more to the equation of airplane vs skyscraper than the material strength of the individual parts involved in the collision.
@@matthewhale1572 Absolute horseshit. When my 223 exits the barrel of my AR, it flies at more than 3,200 feet per second. It can easily penetrate, wood, concrete and thin sheets of steel BUT WILL NOT penetrate my 1/2 steel target. An airplane is a hollow aluminum can and cannot penetrate through 3” thick steel beams regardless of how fast it’s moving. How many buildings we’re supposedly hit by planes at TWC that morning? Two but three buildings collapsed at free fall speed with tons of debris being ejected sideways at certain instances which is an absolute scientific impossibility. Keep believing guys who lived in caves and couldn’t pilot a Cessna aircraft managed to successfully pilot a commercial airline and fly it in a manner even the most skilled pilot cannot pull off. I wish people would think critically instead of just believing what the TV tells them.
I wasn't in NYC, DC, or PA, I was just at work in a warehouse near Detroit. You don't really notice how used to certain noises you are until they're simply not there. Every day it's normal to hear airliners fly overhead constantly there, it's an approach to Detroit metro airport, but that day it was eerily silent and something felt very off about it, I just knew something was wrong. I didn't see what was going on until I got home from work since that warehouse didn't allow people in or out, and nobody really had radios or anything in there. Only thing in the sky was fighter jets, so high up you couldn't really hear them at all, just see the lights on them. It was so f*cked up seeing those people jump out of desperation live on tv, I'll never forget that day. It was also messed up when the east coast blackout hit soon after, that shit was crazy too.
I called in sick that tuesday morning. I just got home from the store, the first plane had already hit. I thought it must've been an accident. Then I 💩 my pants when I watched the second plane hit the other building. I knew then that it was no accident.
In that moment hundreds of people died and the fate of hundreds more was sealed, yet you can't see from the footage. It has an abstract quality, but it's highly disturbing.
@@laxeystu8096 It's just fiction. Don't let it bother you. The airplane image is superimposed on a video of a real event which killed a bunch of people, but there was no airplane involved. Better to not associate their deaths with your illusion of what happened. An illusion that could only come from your unhealthy relationship with the idiot box (the TV) that you should throw out.
@@ryan3999 what are you even trying to say. I can't respond to that because I don't see your original comment in the thread, so I can't know what you're talking about. Personally I always copy the text of the comment I'm reacting to into the new comment. That avoids the other having to engage a perhaps futile search for the information necessary to participate in the conversation. So if you would care to ask me a question with enough information in it to permit me to repsond I will happily respond.
ok, and now ad the parameter, airplane is made of aluminium and plastic, and the building is made of concrete and steel. this was made by some student with phisical knowgledge based on hollywood
And anyone with actual scientific knowledge know that the kind of material doesn't matter is you have enough speed. Even water can cut through steel...
Samuel Trajano Conclusion : A hardened steel blade will be completely disintegrated by a largely less hard concrete barrier if it impact it with enough speed. My point is still valid.
@@jsforce77 Yea 2007 youtube. RUclips was only 2 year old..and this guys talked what happened 6 years ago.Now it's 20 years wow since that terrorist attack.
Anyone else high-key skeptical that many of us got this video recommended all at the same time? I get that it’s a week after the 20th year, but it seems very odd to have so many people get recommended this video 14 years after it was posted.
Title of video: *Scientists simulate jet colliding with World Trade Center* Delivers exactly what it says on the tin and nothing else. If you still need Building 7 - possibly the most studied engineering disaster in history - explained to you in 2023 then I feel sorry for your parents.
Don't worry about something like this anymore The new buildings we are working on are made with middle East passports That material is incredibly strong!
itsghost boi Lol...I shouldn’t laugh, but I know exactly what you’re talking about. Hopefully, they’re built better than building 7.....that didn’t even get hit! 👍🏼
My hope is that it happened so quickly and those poor people did not suffer. I can't even begin to imagine how difficult it has been for the family members of those who died. It's so horrible there are no words. Rest in love and eternal Peace ❤
In accident situations our self quickly separated from our bodies. We're aware but in split seconds we jump out of our bodies and never feel a thing but those who maybe got trapped somewhere else in the incident unfortunately and didn't die in a moment notice they sat w pain eventually once shock wares away and reconnect w reality of something terrible happened but what.. dose this help?
G H About as 'retarded' as the consensus of experts in every relative field, but you know better ;) The passport was ejected by the blast as is common for paper products due to their high surface density. Passports survive plane crashes all the time. There would also be no need whatsoever to plant this passport as the guy was on the flight manifest.
Giulio florio1993 Jet fuel only ignited the fires. They were sustained by the contents of the buildings. We have many examples of passports survivng airliner crashes so this is nothing overly unusual.
We will always be grateful for the heroic efforts of the FDNY, NYPD and first responders who acted selflessly and gave their lives to help others on that day. Many have since died and continue to die from 9/11 related illness as a result of the inhalation of toxic dust from Ground Zero 🙏🏽
@@ThetOLogrin - typical....bring politics into it.🙄 The "defund" issue hit the headlines with the George Floyd incident almost 20 years later. I'm certain ALL sides of the political spectrum in 2001 had so much gratitude to not only the NYPD, but every other first responder.🥰
It is incredible that an aluminum plane broke the steel beams of the best in history capable of withstanding more than 300 degrees, the thermite explosive makes no noise
Steven Bee I think you are stretching the limits of credibility with that pop can vs solid wall of titanium Steven. What do you mean a solid wall? Is that solidly front to back or side to side. How far was that titanium wall solid for? Was it 12 feet thick solid or was it 4 miles thick solid? How fast do you think you can propel a pop can before it vaporizes from friction with air? How would you devise a plan to propel this can to the necessary velocity to penetrate this wall of unspecified thickness?
+Steven Bee Nobody is interested in your scientific gobeldygook Stepen. I've done years of internet reaserch and have made my findings public, proving that it was a false flag. You deflecting only serves to prove that your a paid shill, probably at the behest of the powerful Jews at the controls.
No Steven, the screen name you replied to was a sock puppet that duplicates other user's accounts. Maybe if you exercised a bit of due diligence by checking into the accounts of these cretins that call you names, you might just put these attacks into perspective.
I worked a five minute walk from the Trade Center on that day, witnessed everything. I only wish that day and what I saw could be somehow erased from my memory...
Google is erasing the truth as much as possible. WTC 7 fell at free fall speeds. NOTHING hit the building. It was never even mentioned in the final commissioners report. The governments report. WHY? Does the government truly believe that humans are that ignorant? We all still go about our daily lives every day as if we all take what they tell us as the truth.
No... I'm sorry, but in no way do I buy this. Aluminium that has been completely obliterated and destroyed from the impact cannot slice and cut through solid steel like that.
Good thing there were no steel I-beams then. Probably why the real event actually happened the way we all saw and why this model is so close to _what actually happened_ This is why in science and engineering we rely on _true facts_ rather than baseless assumptions.
I'm thinking that probably most weren't even looking out the windows when the 1st plane hit. Why would they be? They didn't know it was gonna happen so therefor most were probably just getting settled in for their days work....Bur I'm sure there were at least a few who happened to look out and see it coming.......I just can't imagine being in anyones shoes there that day!
@@nadershah4845 yeah, that's bullshit too. But does it make the killings of the innocent people in the twin towers any better? Can't we be sad for both?
I was there that morning in NYC and witnessed everything except the impact of the first plane in the North Tower which I observed no less than 3 or 4 minutes after impact. Changed my whole life forever.
I still can’t wrap my head around how a plane that crashed into the building towards the top of the building can cause the huge I beams toward the ground to fail. It seems like the columns under the damage would be fine. Above the damaged columns would definitely fail.
Have you seen what happens to aluminium when it's on fire and you pour water on it? Water from the sprinkler system in the building must have been pouring. ruclips.net/video/hRO7bU-If5s/видео.html
@@petervankas1352 By the CIA and Mossad who financed and conned the Saudi patsy pilots to commit this atrocity! It was an inside job! Don't believe it? What about building SEVEN??? Never hit but went into FREE FALL! We have been duped and lied to! Suckers all!
Ever heard of inertia and momentum? You can get killed by a tomato if said tomato is thrown fast enough. Even though your head in comparison is much more rigid than a tomato.
@Qmies your ignorance is hillarious. You 911 truthers are so ignorant you border on just strait up stupid. Id recommend education but your stupidity prevents such a notion..
I sh** you not as soon as the dude said “notice the oscillations” there was an earthquake about 10 miles from my house that shook my whole house back and forth. Crazy coincidence.
@@carmineredd1198 haha . was just a 4.5 earthquake in carson, CA. on the 17th of September. but the epicenter was so close to my house it shook the sh** out of it
OK, but what if there were no 24x24 steel beams? Because,... well,.... there weren't. What there was were 14x14 hollow box columns welded up from 9.5mm A36 plate, then bolted together.
@@MFitz12 are you s structural engineer? planes are made of aluminum, I can see the engine ripping thru but the lighter exposed wing tips and rudder/elevators? I have an Airframe and Powerplant license, Pilot License and I'm a very amateur welder.
@@marcusanderson7880 i do know that the building collapsed due to the failure of the core structure, that would be interesting if they made a simulation where they placed explosives at the bottom of the building
No they didn't. There are significant differences between the collapses of the two Twin Towers even though they were both of identical design and hit by the same type of plane. The collapses of Building 3, 4, 7 and St Nicholas Church were all completely different.
@@MFitz12 For starters, how about the wiley coyote imprint of the plane on the building. Too funny. Even funnier is the 2 or more angles showing the nose of the plane come out the other side. Comedy. No debris at all at the point of impact, the plane just melts into the building? (In the simulation and on video that day). Have you watched videos on the construction of the twin towers AND the construction of an airplane??? I have. Did you see the fire ball explosion after the plane disappeared into the building??.....so did I, that was jet fuel right...one big fire ball released and ignited all at once right? Right, I agree. So........what melted steel then? There is video of molten steele literally pouring out of the building. It's a video documented fact. So.......what melted the steel if all the jet fuel exploded during the impact? Office furniture and drywall???? Many other high rise buildings around the world have burned for much much longer and didn't collapse. Why is that? How did a handful of collapsed floors fall and pancake 70+ otherwise undamaged floors? THEN AGAIN, TWICE IN ONE DAY???? No wait, a 3rd!!!!!!! And the third building wasn't hit by a plane?? Too many questions, with too many bad answers.
@@leopardcubpupkryky6940 - 1. So your first objection is that an aircraft impact makes a damage pattern the size and shape of the aircraft???? I struggle to understand why this is a problem. Would you prefer the impact damage be in the shape of a bus? A train? 2. Neither of the aircraft which struck the Twin Towers "melted" into anything. Given their immense mass and velocity they had sufficient energy to penetrate the thin cage that was the perimeter of the towers - which was easily penetrated by light i.imgur.com/hJdqzcp.jpg and mostly air by volume. For the vast majority of us who have at least a vague understanding of how energy works there is nothing particularly surprising about this. During the impact process the aircraft were both converted into millions of tiny bits. They did not melt into the building. They were violently shredded. The streets of Lower Manhattan were absolutely littered with aircraft debris, human remains, etc. What do you see here; cryptome.org/info/wtc-punch/pict8.jpg Or here; cryptome.org/info/wtc-punch/pict33.jpg 3. The jet fuel was burned off within about a minute, It acted as an accelerant. There was no melting of steel. Can't believe I still have to address that steaming pile of stupid in 2021. They need to start teaching metal shop class in high school again. 4. The video you speak of does not show molten STEEL. You want it to be molten steel so you assume it is, but you have no actual proof and because you are a conspiratard who hust mindlessly copies other peoples bad ideas you did not put in the due diligence to figure out that mych of the debris from Flight 175 was pushed up into that exact spot AND that location also housed a large backup battery farm for one of the resident banks. Large quantities of loose lead and aluminum. Far more likely candidates to explain an anomaly that is clearly not relevant to collapse initiation mechanisms anyway. 5. What STEEL FRAMED high rise building have burned for LONGER than the Twin Towers AFTER suffering catastrophic PHYSICAL DAMAGE from the HIGH SPEED IMPACT of 117 TONS OF JUMBO JET? Yeah, you left that last part out. I noticed. Shouldn't have, but you did. It might have been deliberate but in my experience conspiracy believers are single-element thinkers. This is why they can not grasp something as complex as Twin Tower collapses. Too many elements. What brought down the Twin Towers was the combination of Impact Damage + Fire + Time + Gravity. That's 4 (four) elements. Take any one of those out of the equation and there is no collapse. You only mentioned one element; fire. Completely left out the other 3. No wonder you can not grasp Twin Tower collapses. 6. Did you know that when you say "the third tower wasn't even hit by a plane" that is tacit admission that a plane can bring down a building?
that's why you are one of millions of you tube superstar commentators that are certainly not unique and commenting on stuff way way above your pay scale in the first place. It truly is as simple as that . But your stuck behind a screen and at least your harmful only to yourself, just as long as you remain there and not get to adventurous with your "intellect" lol
On a building that was engineered to withstand a direct hit from aircraft, at that. And then not a trace found afterwards, other than random parts from aircraft not matching the purported aircraft in question. Then there's WTC 7, that just fell inside of itself...
@@Noitisnt-ns7mo Ok. Thanks for the confirmation of what I suspected. That you're a useless turd with nothing to say. Just a fake ego that only you believe in. All others who've been peripherally involved in your life have already understood how useless you are so now you seek out new dupes on youtube. I hope you find what you need without bothering too many people.
@@lebergerdesphotons4565 I think what Roman was trying to say was that this video focused solely on the technical aspect of the impact and ignored the human side, i.e. the great suffering, loss of life, and emotional scarring. For many people, talking about one without mentioning the other is abhorrent. This was such a great tragedy that not touching on the human side feels like an affront or an insult to all those affected. However, in order to truly understand most things, we must be able to remove emotion from the equation since it risks creating a bias. This is a very difficult thing for most people to do.
I have not seen this before now. My sister's office was where the nose of the plane went in. My solace is that she probably did not know what happened.
Thanks for a terrific animation.
Sorry to hear that amigo. Did they ever find anything of her? Or is she one of the 1109 people that are still "missing"?
@@Flupmeister1 she was identified through DNA 11 months later. Still miss her terribly.
Kurt Dietrich feels bad man hope you get better
Sorry for your loss...
Ah man, I’m so sorry. At least it was a quick death may she rest in piece and her memory never forgotten as with the many who lost their lives or were injured during the attack.
Who else randomly got this in their recommended?
Shut the fuck to please, it’s the most unoriginal comment ever
@@olindevos i was gonna type the exact same thing (up instead of to). tired of these idiots.
And who the fuck will give a like on this comment motherfuckers
Yo I'm getting so much hate lol. Didn't really think people who actually start hating for saying this. It's not that deep. And it is true as well🤣😂
@@olindevos uh... okay. It's not wrong to do it but I'm just stating facts aren't I
It’s crazy how far we’ve come with computers, nowadays people can make this simulation and it would look like real life
@@onumahobart8832 go home you are drunk
Y’all trippin, this is the best of the best technology of the time they couldn’t fake it
Except this is to fool you into believing the lies.
True
@@evangeffner1194 We know 9/11 was an inside job now, so they must indoctrinate the next generation.
Ya gotta admit that computer programming was incredible. And it was 10 years old
17 years ago
I see your comment was made in 2023.
The video was actually uploaded in 2007 so that would have made it 6 years after the attack
It’s disturbing to think there were people in that plane, and people right there at their desks, that were either crushed or incinerated or both. The ones who died instantly were spared the horror, despair, injury and pain of those who survived, only to die in the collapse.
Based on a couple of witnesses that were near the buildings after the first plane hit, there were body parts littered around the grounds. They go into a little bit of detail about it in the Nat Geo docuseries on 9/11.
It sounds to me like the wings sent a lot of people flying, many in pieces, down to the ground from the upper floors.
I would've much rather have gone instantly on impact than be stuck above or around the impact site(s).
Imagine the ones sitting close to the windows and seeing the planes right before impact.
@@BryanClark-gk6ie - There was the one story of a young woman, just got to work, did a pregnancy test, it was positive. She was at her desk in the North Tower, telling her husband the good news over the phone. She must have seen the plane barreling toward her, screamed OMG, and the line went dead. Sickening. Her name was Patricia A. Massari age 25. She worked for Marsh & McLennan on the 98th floor of the North Tower.
I composed music for this, premiered yesterday
There are videos of people who God only knows survived the impact zone, standing on the very edge of the torn and mangled building with fire all around them...some where till it collapsed, so sad for families who identified there loved one by the clothes worn & seen on the images
I can't actually believe that I'm reading people comment that its impossible for aluminum to penetrate steel as if the plane should have bounced off the exterior of the building.
Apparently they don't understand kinetics or shearing force. I imagine if this was a steel plane crashing into an aluminum building they would expect an intact plane to have popped out the other end and kept on flying.
+BollocksUtwat LOL SHEARING FORCE. LOOK AT THIS SHEEP EVERYONE, HE NEEDS SOME SHEARING TOO, HE IS ACTUALLY BACKING UP THE IDEA THAT ALUMINUM > STEEL.
+Jeff L A lump of aluminum at sufficient velocity could turn NYC into an irradiated crater. Ignoring high-relativistic impact, jet airliners move *fast*, and regardless of what they're made of, weigh many tons. That much mass doesn't give fucks about whether it's iron or compressed feathers, if it's moving at ~300MPH, it'll blow holes in shit. I'm not saying all the damage to the World Trade Center was caused by the planes alone, but hey.
+Jeff L better talk all capts to back up your point if anybody is a sheep here its you you cant even think for yourself
i don't think for myself because I typed in caps, infallible sheep logic. Uses my own term of sheep against me, can't come up with his own thoughts. You are just a filter for other people's thoughts to be re-projected out onto others. You have probably managed to live your entire life thus far without a truly original thought crossing your tiny mind. I very much doubt you are a real person.
Sheeple Herder And yet you still haven't provided an actual argument for your side of the debate. Insulting people and screaming in all caps- Which is considered by intelligent citizens of the internet to be a sign of idiocy, and regardless of your actual intelligence, causes people to dismiss you as a random angry idiot -doesn't constitute a sound explanation.
Man, you know you're in a weird spot in life when you randomly end up here at 2:25 a.m. on a Monday morning.
This hit a bit too close to home haha (2:01 AM here)
wtf, it's 2.27am as I read this.
hahaha
4:15 am on a Monday as I type this. Missed it by a couple hours my bad
2:05 am hahaha
I did,I lost my brother Kohn M Rigo at the WTC in NYC. He was working for Marsh in the self insured group at the time. I think about my brother John every day and still I miss him. FYI - I pray for all the folks murdered on 09:11 and their families and friends .☮️✝️☮️✝️☮️✝️
Marsh got hit hard that day. RIP to your brother John. 🌹
Why are these kids in the classroom with bush singing PLANE MUST HIT STEEL ? Coincidence? Rip Al the victim’s ❤️
Well if you want revenge. Know who the perpetrators are.
For a critically thinking individual This should be enough evidence to prove beyond a doubt that
SATANIC ( 33RD DEGREE ) MASONIC/ILLUMINATI. CONTROL OUR GOVERNMENTS AND THE WORLD.
They are Corrupt, evil and very, very Symbolic. Our entire history was literally manufactured.
You can fake alot of things but dates of large documented events proves very difficult.
Like we should all be able to agree that the TWIN TOWERS fell on 9/11/2001 correct?
So I don't expect anyone to just believe anything I say .
MY HOPE IS THAT EVERYONE WOULD DO THEIR OWN RESEARCH AND TRY TO PROVE THE INFORMATION WRONG.
This is just a small example OF 33RD degree symbolism.
⬇️
....................................
One big MASONIC symbol is the square and compass flanked by Pillars, representing the Roman numerals IXXI wich is 911.
The US emergency #911 was adopted in 1968. 1968+33=2001
The WTC broke ground in 1968.
And fell 33YRS later in 2001.
The OWNER of the WTC complex was David Rockefeller.
He was on the cover of Newsweek on 4/3/1967. 43🔄34+1967=2001.
In the picture he was Overlooking NYC at the future sight of the TWIN TOWERS. The hands on his watch were at 9 and 11.
The Pentagon broke ground on 9/11/1941 and was Nicknamed ground zero. Exactly 60yrs later both locations were hit. And the N.name was transferred to the site of the WTC.
The first president to publicly mention the coming of the NEW WORLD ORDER was George Bush sr in a speech on
9/11/1990 exactly 11 before the TWIN TOWERS fell.
The USS NEW YORK was built with Recycled steel from the WTC. The original USS NEW YORK was commissioned on 9/11/1911 and was Decommissioned in a supposed nuclear test.
The ILLUMINATI was supposedly founded in 1776. The
ONE WORLD TRADE CENTER that replaced the TWIN TOWERS is 1,776ft tall earning it the N.name freedom tower. THE observation deck is on the 68th floor.
6+3=9
8+3=11
1968 BBC short film called NEWS BENDERS.
media lies creates news 5 years in advance to scare the masses to sway public opinion and move money faster.
(Good watch) 30 min .
WW1 Start Date: 07/28/1914
07+28+19+14= 68.
WW2 Start Date: 09/01/1939
09+01+19+39= 68.
RUSS/UKRAINE aka
WW3 Start Date: 02/24/2022
02+24+20+22= 68.
6 + 3=9
8 + 3=11
The MAYAN CALENDAR ended on 12/21/2012 according to the gregorian calendar that we currently use. we didn't start using until the mid 1500s.
If you use the ETHIOPIAN CALENDAR that is much OLDER and also mentioned in the bible multiple times. It changes the Mayan end date to 12/31/2019. The day NIH declared C-19 a pandemic. also NEW YEARS EVE 2020. hindsight is 20/20 is reference to year and clear vision.
ETHIOPIAN NEW YEARS DAY is not 01/01...its 9/11.
Revelation 9:11
Is about ABADDON/ APOLLION the angel of the Bottomless pit.
Look up pics Depicting ABADDON /APOLLION.
Look up( IS TRUMP APOLLION)
You'll find a book titled
TRUMP, ABADDON AND OBAMA.
Suggesting that Trump is ABADDON sent to defeat satans Army. suggesting that Obama is SATAN.
I know it sounds batshit crazy.
BUT?
There are photos of Obama dressed as SATAN and nobody else is in costume.
The cover of the Economist magazine 12/22/2012 was a cartoon Depicting the 7 Deadly sins. Bankers are on a train labeled greed. Obama is in a rowboat labeled pride. Wich was satans sin.
if you spell Obama's daughter's names backwards
Take out the word ALAH it spells
I AM SATAN.
AILAM AHSATAN
MALIA NATASHA
There is a video clip of Netanyahu with Obama. Netanyahu refers to Obama as big Satan and Israel as little Satan.
Luke 10:18 kjv
I saw SATAN fall from heaven like lightning.....
( Lightning, Fall from high )
Hebrew translation
Barac bama.
A FESTIVAL in Italy called
CARNIVAL de VIAREGIO. Has 150FT Trump float dressed as ABADDON.
NO OPINIONS
All facts.
You can decide what it all means. But in my opinion if you believe it means nothing. Then you're brainwashed AF.
If you have anything to add or you think I got something wrong please feel free to comment 🙏☮❤✝️🌐
simple answer @@bas5925 those responsible are criminally insane
Очень жаль. Твой брат с тобой, только встретиться нет возможности.
I was a tourist that day visiting NYC - my third time there at the time. I really wanted to go to the top of the twin towers and we had tried to go the previous weekend but it was full. We were supposed to go on tuesday but my family decided last minute we would go to empire state instead and visit the WTC later in the day. While we were getting ready to head out that tuesday morning, we all found ourselves glued to the TV in our hotel watching the horrible images. What a scary time, I was just 13 and couldn't believe it was real.
*Bla bla bla*
bullshit
Mad that everyone’s got some kind of spin on a story that they were meant to be there and something magically kept them from going.
Also, if you were there, as in in New York, what were you watching on TV in your hotel for? Surely you could have just looked outside?
@@thomas-thequestionableseri1095 Have you ever been to NYC? Yeah, you can’t see the WTC from everywhere in the city.
The amount of people saying something like this is just unbelievable, literally
Its hard to believe it's been almost 20 years since that happened
I know right
I know
@@richarda1568 i know
indeed
Give them time, they have to wait several decades before they ever do anything else that involves the gubmint murdering AmeriKKKan citizens to start another war. This was worse than Pearl Harbor where they watched people die at the hands of a foreign nation to jump into a war, this time they actually murdered their own people to jump into a war that wasn't even connected to the people they said committed the act, LOLZ.
Thanks Alghorithym for this 14 year old video.
ikr
It's the 20th anniversary, so there will be a lot of interest, producing more ad revenue.
i was not even 1 when this was made, mad
Hey the same people behind covid did 911
Didn't look at the date until I saw this comment lol, I was gonna say what's with the terrible physics with minecraft graphics? Now it makes sense. Would be nice if this was remade now.
What's crazy is how this was produced and uploaded to fledgling RUclips only 5 years and change after the event. By comparison, 5 years ago was 2018.
Nowadays 5 years ago would be almost 2020.
@@foakjljrwajkltawtrawtwa441 you guys are just subtraction geniuses
I can't imagine sitting in a cubicle when that plane came inside. RIP and God bless all affected. 20 years today.
Imagine having a window view.
There’s one guy I heard somewhere that watched the plane come directly at him and he was under the wing that was higher and survived. I think he still might be alive.
Omg I could only imagine how terrify all the workers in that building had suffered. It just so sad and all these people didn’t have to die like this.
@@5StarTigas alive and lying.
@@princesselani340 yes, if only they hadn't been political hostages of the u.s. gov't which at that time was controlled at a certain level by the neocons. But they didn't make it happen. The real power on this planet doesn't permit doofuses like them to have direct access to the real technology.
The people who brought the buildings down were the same people who wanted to bring them down legally and were refused the right to do a controlled demolition. In order to not pay so much as it would have cost to disassemble the buildings, they blew them up with unknown technology. Let them give a signal to others in other countries that they have this technology, and let them remove all of our pseudo freedoms that we thought we had. Two stones with one bird.
Oh gosh! Old Google Earth rendering! I remember back when none of the buildings had textures or details
Ik, how far we have come hey
I remember when there were no buildings
I didn't even realize it changed, I thought Google earth still looks like this.
We’re all nerds confirmed
@@DamienAlexander ah I think these days they just use scans of buildings like in Google Maps.
Imagine what it would look like 14 years later with today's simulation?
I'm more like Imagining that day. What it was like on that plane. Remembering Watching these planes hit the towers on tv and everyone scared and confusing. I went to work but no one did any work. We were glued to the tvs. America was under attack and wondered what planes have terrorist on them and what are they hitting next? The most disturbing part was when you could see people committing suicide before the building collapsed and thinking what would I have done?
It would look like Real Life.... So was 14 years ago actually nothing more than a computer game created 28 years in the future?
@@GunnerRDS ah yes i also think modern games are indistinguishable from reality 🤦♀️
Its a simplified physics model. It could have looked way better allready back than.
60fps
I love how people are so possessed by the delusion that airplane wings are “flimsy” or “paper thin.” Airplane wings are extremely strong and can support several times the plane’s weight. I don’t know the rating of 767 wings, but some plane wings are rated at 12 times the plane’s weight. Have you seen a stress test? The wings can bend fully vertical and they don’t break.
Also this notion that planes are built like soda cans? The aluminum they use is usually 6061 or 7075. Both of them are high quality and very very strong, and are also, you know, NOT the only metals they use… like, they have titanium and steel parts too, guys.
Planes are friggin strong.
Sorry I have to disagree with you, planes are not built to be strong they are built to be lightweight
@@jimmoravec1326 you “disagree,” eh? I guess that means the factual information means nothing.
@@Moakmeister
What are you basing your facts on ?
@@jimmoravec1326 the engineers who built the planes? Lol
@@Moakmeister
They built the planes stronger than steel and concrete ?
Oh yes I forgot they are magic planes, never mind
Man...I was only 8 years old when this happened. What a scary day that was as a former New Yorker.
Me also 1993😅
@@anandjiya same 50 miles north of the City sitting in my 3rd grade classroom
94 from California. This day will not be forgotten
I’m a former New Yorker, I worked on Wall St. when they were being built. I was 53 when they collapsed, in court, sentencing a murderer to prison. I will never forget that day. Our family lost several people, three were relatives, the rest were friends. It still feels like it happened yesterday.
@@mchapman132 Wow.
The people on those floors where the planes hit had no chance may God Rest their souls.
Sadly those people prolly had the most painless experience that day compared to the rest of floors above.
And the gutless pigs who took all those innocent people's lives rot in hell.
They were spared the pain, and fear. RIP
Amazingly a few survived the impact in tower 2. Absolutely amazing and terrifying story. It's in the new doc on hulu/national geographic.
One story was a young wife went to work, purchased a pregnancy test on the way, took the test….it was positive. She was by the window in her office in the tower, on the phone with her elated husband, telling him they were going to be parents……..in seconds she screamed…..he could hear the loud roar of a plane drown out the call and then nothing. Heartbreaking.
Here because it's 9\11. My condolences goes to the people who were involved in this tragic event 🤍🙏
The facade of the building was 14 inch steel box beams, these box beams were built from approximately 2"-2.5" inch thick steel. I understand the physics involved when two objects collide at high speed. I am a FAA LICENSED AIRFRAME AND POWERPLANT TECHNICIAN, I'm very familiar with the construction of these aircraft. Everyone thinks that a big airplane must be built out of fairly substantial materials, their not, they are engineering marvels because of their amazing strenghth, yet extremely light weight, and minimal materials, the problem that I have is, even at the velocity this jet was traveling I find it hard to believe that the wings, from the out board side of the engine nacelles, to the winglets on the tips, would have enough mass, even at that velocity, to cut a near perfect silhouette of the airplane through the 14 inch square box beam, built out of between 2 inch-2.5 inch thick steel plate, facade on the faces of the building !
Exactly
You may be an FAA A&P certified mechanic...doesn't make you expert in physics or metallurgy. To think you actually believe you know more than the 'SCIENTISTS' who developed this.
@@jamesw71 literally shut up dude. The plane would have disintegrated against such metal objects almost like hitting a wall. No way it would bring the building down, multiple reports were of explosions that day both in basement (wait, wasn’t the impact on the 70th floor?) yeah I say bullshit. Oh, and a full building 7 collapse without ANY impact?
@@jamesw71 yes big boy quotation marks on the "scientists"
Sadly, here we are 22 years later and people still have their heads in the sand. Anyone with a bit of common sense would question the official story, considering the amount of wars that were then supposedly justified by this "terrorist attack" on American "freedoms".
Damn this animation is pretty good for 13 years ago
da foocha they had ray tracing and everything.
Not really, full of physics violations like all the airplane parts being indestructible after breaching the wall, and never slowing down even when hitting other objects, and even no gravity!
So Purdue violates the conservation of energy, equal and opposite forces, and even that gravity exists, with parts floating UP at the end and traveling a straight line without arcing towards the Earth. The Bugs Bunny Road Runner show was more accurate.
p.s. As a bonus, some parts just vanish when hit, violating that matter can't be destroyed.....
@@anthonywilliams7052
how are you dealing with being in a world where most people are either stupid or refuse to believe their own eyes and ears? I'm finding it stressful.
@@lebergerdesphotons4565 It isn't fun sometimes but I've found that more and more people are paying more attention and more open-minded in general than 5 or 10 years ago. Also, many more people fighting back, exposing the craziness all over. That goes for 9/11 and the craziness going on in the world now. More and more people are finally speaking up. Don't let the media convince you otherwise. Better yet, don't watch any TV. I go to thrift stores sometimes and talk to other people, mention the crazy things in the media and almost always several other people will speak up. Be the first to say things and watch how fast people speak up and see there are many people that feel just like we do. We just need to organize, protest, expose the other side every way possible. Use their tactics against them like calling their financers and ask if they support things like the 173 segregated college or rheysyst things taught there now. Many new media or more popular media too like Epoch Times too.
The far-left is only about 8% but they are taught to be very active and get a lot of financing and paid protesters too.
We just need to organize and fight back as much as possible now so it doesn't turn into a Sivel Wore as they want. Support for the left is at record lows now, if not for hacked machines very few would be in office.
Check out a channel Salty Cra---cker too (no dashes), see him here and better yet on Ody___see where many channels are moving since there isn't sen so ring. He's pretty funny and you can see where people are fighting back.
Like one of my favorite movies said, "never give up, never surrender".
p.s. Check the plane's seating charts and the number of passengers, what are the chances most of the planes would barely be about 25% full when they bumped people from planes to keep them at 100%? Search for "911 research seating charts" and see what I mean. I mostly stick to the numbers since they are easier to prove.
@@anthonywilliams7052
well anthony, I sure hope that there are lots more like you out there. I haven't owned a television for 13 years (since the divorce).
I noticed one thing which seems important to keep in mind. There is a theory that suggests that there are inanimate, non-alive microscopic particles so small that you have to have a very expensive machine to even have a shadowy image of them.
The theory goes on further to suggest that when nobody's looking these not alive particles penetrate the membranes of living cells and take over their reproductive systems and reprogram them temporarily to use them for their own purposes.
Has this theory ever been substantiated?
I've looked. I'd say somebody would have had to create an experiment which cleverly demonstrates that this is a true fact.
The person or persons who'd have managed this would surely have accumulated a nobel prize or two and we'd all know their names.
But I can't find any such experiment.
So I have to conclude that there is no proof that any virus exists which has these capacities.
Since there is no proof of that, I have to conclude that alternative theories are just as valuable.
That perhaps particles that look like that are actually molecular debris from our own dying cells or the cells of any of thousands of species of colleague bacteria that my have died in our bodies.
The envelope they talk about may be our own cells work. Perhaps our own cells do the equivalent of putting certain debris in a plastic bag of their own creation because it will be easier than breaking this debris down further.
Why not? There's no proof of the other theory.
So based on some unproven theory, the pharm companies write a bunch of papers which we're all supposed to believe are true. But in every case they are based on this unsustained theory, and therefore are not at all true.
Can anybody find peer reviewed papers which show a repeatable experiment which clearly demonstrates the virus theory?
I can't and I haven't and I've looked.
If you have found such a thing please point me in the right directions so I can see it too.
But I think the virus theory is like 911 and the apollo program.
It's bullshit which is used to steal money from us all and in this case our health too.
However the new technology that we still don't have access to is the technology which turned two giant buildings into microscopic dust particles in a few seconds while we watched.
That is real. That could get us to and from the moon inside of the waldorf astoria. we could even bring the swimming pool.
And all of the doofuses here refuse to believe in that and they've seen it with their own eyes.
I was just looking at misinterpretations of the seismic data from that day.
It didn't even mention that there were no s waves and p waves, only surface waves.
The waves measured show that suddenly 350,000 tons of weight was removed from the surface.
Figures don't lie but liars can figure.
Not sure who said that before my mother did, probably somebody famous.
“A high quality physically accurate visualization”
Upper limit 240p...
The "high quality" doesn't refer to high definition. Rather, it refers to the detail and accuracy to the physical effects of the crash. They could easily take that same rendering and reanimate it in higher resolution using newer technology.
240p was the upper limit for YT in 2007. True dat.
Welcome to 2007
Bruh it was made in 2007 💀
Trash Millenial Outing
In 2020, why is this in my reccommended?
The 19th anniversary is next week so that's probably why.
Sterling Gaddis so you never forget
@@jeyDsixx18 this better not happen again damnit
Oh God
Because pentagon partnered with google and wants people to stop believing that they did 9/11, by showing us these "simulations".
Like the Original Architect said many times, it’s like a hole puncture into a screen, built with the capability withstand multiple 707 hits which were also wide body aircraft in their day‼️
yep that 2000 ton Hat Truss on the roof was designed to take care of that exterior lattice and 100 floors in the event of a wild strike
funniest thing: aircraft was not even shaked while hitting the steel wall, not slowed down, nothing bent, cracked or broke away, just sliding in as if it is a computer animation is, same like this video.
@@smert_okupantam John Lear was all over this state produced nonsense back in Jan 2008. Read his posted affidavit.
@@2001DestructionofLies built to withstand 707 hits. Not 767 flying at
440 hits.
Yamasaki said nothing of the sort. The person who made this statement was the engineer in charge if the construction after the 93 bombing. He was not involved with the original design and not qualified to make such a statement.
The only thing I find funny about this (from a 2021 standpoint) is how he keeps reiterating that it's a state of the art animation system. My, we've come a long way.
Edit: how are there 62 replies on this thing already
This shit must have been a fucking bitch to render/simulate.
We? You mean scientists cause they ain't a damn thing 99% of people have done to better science. This is like taking credit for something you didn't do.
Only thing...it isn't and it wasn't, not even back then, those are false statements.
@@midsizesedan7620 Maybe take a trip south of the wall and touch some grass :]
@@midsizesedan7620 scientists don't make these , they have 3D artists and programmers make sims
But ig scientists provide the math for realistic physics
Before 9/11 tech magazines theorized a terror attack would consist of a Boeing 747 being flown into a nuclear power plant.
the very same day there was a simulation of exactly the sort of attack which actually happened.
The only difference between the simulation and the attack was that the simulation invoked (fake) airplanes. The attack had no airplanes. Only the belief of airplanes.
Because 99% of americans believe the TV more completely than they believe their own senses.
@@lebergerdesphotons4565 hold on you don’t believe they were planes?
@@lebergerdesphotons4565 and as for the people in New York who used their visual senses to watch the horrifying scene of a pair of planes hitting two of the most iconic buildings on the planet?
@@NaenaeGaming show me their statements. I don't believe it happened that way and that looking at their statements will show that to be the case. send me a link.
@@lebergerdesphotons4565 there are literally videos of the planes crashing into the towers.
Not trying to be funny at all, but after 911 I always thought that if I worked in a sky scraper I would have a parachute under my desk.
LOL. You're not the only one who's had that thought.
even living in 15 floor apartement i will prepare it, due unpredrict earthquake can be happen amytime
You probably would be better off with something like a hang glider type of device rather than a parachute. At just fifteen stories, a parachute would probably not have enough time to deploy properly and do much to slow you down. Just a thought.
Agree tawnku! Rope another options, but it has possibility some people may use it too
Helot Djut LOL...true. Yet, would you deny others a chance to be able to escape? I don't think you are that type of person. You seem to be a person that truly understands the value of all life.
It's absolutely impossible to even try to imagine what passengers must have felt just before their plane crashed into buildings.
you mean the Arab Pilots maybe, but the passengers didnt know anything. The Arab Pilots were actually very brave soldiers.
@@baloopa-sv9xr ...too brave
@@baloopa-sv9xr They were no soldiers. They were cowardly Islamist murdering nutters.
who else got this in their recommended feed today on 9/11?
same
Desert Gecko yup
9/16
same... creepy YT tryna take attention away froom Hunter Biden stuff
Building 7 mr pullit egh!.
Word of warning ...if you start listening to this video with head phones ....lower the sound quickly!!
Paws n Claws thx
That was really cool and graphic and at the same time so very sad to see what those people inside would have seen. I know they would not have known what happened. This video was extremely well done and thank you for taking us inside and see what happened. So many years later and it still breaks my heart. Amazing the technology we have.
This does not show at all what happened. Where are the explosions? Not the one from the plane, but the one around the building? Why is this a pro explanation video when REAL scientist say that both thos buildings could have withhold 13 planes each. This was all done from inside.
tower 7
@TrueHelp7 already debunked. Why don't you mention the zombies or the lasers?
@@vyros.3234 Meanwhile there are thousands of independent engineers who disagree with the, what was it, a 12 person panel's opinion? Tower 7, which was over 50 stories tall could not have collapsed at those speeds or in that direction under that form of damage. There was minimum fire, the object didn't penetrate that far, and right before it collapsed, you can see flashes of light and the windows popping in a straight line near a structural location on a corner. Their official opinion was "tower 7 collapsed because of fires" -Shyam Sunders which is the guy youre probably referring to in one shape or form. Here is the thing. No jet fuel, and its the first time before or since a metal high rise has ever collapsed from fire. EVER. There have been buildings built half as well burn for over a month and were still standing. Tower 7 was the facility that housed the backup data for government debt. It was destroyed the day after the pentagon stated they couldn't account for 2 trillion dollars. Coincidentally the part of the pentagon that collapsed was the other location that data was stored. There were far too many coincidences during 9/11. Such as the plane that was crashed into a field is the only time weve ever in aviation history that there was nearly zero discernable pieces of the plane or bodies. It's not like we havent had similar if not exact same planes land nose first with more left over. And I never saw anyone like Alex Jones going to court for talking about it, because the government doesn't want to have to defend the evidence. I can tell you haven't invested any real time into it all. Cheers.
@@vyros.3234 ignore him, just another one of those again
If we had camera phones back then we would of got to see the inside view of this tragic
That would be absolutely horrific for any family members of the people that lost their life's.
@@randomsimpsonsquotes6033 false. it would present closure.
Um pretty sure the phones would incinerate so there wouldn’t be any footage
I think the people in the floors above the impact zones were basically cooked.
A lot jumped, but not everyone needed to. I think some waited.
It is horrifying.
However that is the story in a high-rise block and uncontrollable fire (like Grenfell tower here in UK).
@@marykathryn4713 the can go live on the phone so there would be footage
One thing I find incredible about this simulation is that it utilizes ray tracing, which is something that ONLY in recent years has hardware been able to render in real time. Really neat!
Que es el "trazado de rayos"?
raytracing is nothing new. It was used in the 90s
@@mw00295 right but it hasn’t been rendered in real time on consumer hardware until just recently. Prior to 2018 it was not a selling point of gpus, just a rendering method that otherwise took several machines, and days to render out.
@@mw00295 Ray tracing was first described in the first half of the 16th century, and first accomplished on a computer in the late 1960s.
@@MealsMedia the video you just watched was most likely not rendered in real time, with each frame taking minutes or even hours to render. Ray tracing has been used in 3d animated movies since their inception. It's not a new technology, and modern games still cheat a lot with Ray tracing, as most of them aren't rendered using full ray tracing (e.g. Global lighting), and only smaller things like mirror reflections are actually Ray traced.
Algorithm: “It has been 14 years. He’s ready now”
Same here
I: Yes
And click in the video.
its still too soon.
right? :(
The ends of the plane's wings are so weak that they can be damaged if you stand on them, yet amazingly, they can slice through steel beams
Well, none of that is true. Do pay attention.
@@TheCriticalStinker-jw4fl Ha Ha Ha - of course we believe you - are you paying attention ??
I remember 9/11 like it was yesterday. I was in Florida at the time on holiday with my family from the UK. We had literally just arrived at a Disney waterpark and were told to evacuate. On the radio there was a report of a "small plane going into the WTC". We went back to our villa and switched the TV. I literally could not believe what I was seeing. When the second plane hit the South Tower, I was stunned. It was like watching a movie, but the fact it was reality I was watching was horrifying and hard to grasp. By the time the second tower collapsed, I was in tears. We went out to eat that night and the US people were incredible. Their grit in the face of such a tragedy, their camaraderie and grace with us and their determination to see justice. What also haunts me is that literally an exact year before, I went to New York and had dinner in the beautiful "Windows on the World" restaurant on the 107th floor of the North Tower. I remember my Mum asking me to stand in the window for a photo, but I was too nervous to do so as I don't like heights. To think that so many people were trapped up on those high floors of the towers at those same windows with no option but to remain or jump is horrendous. Just terrifying and awful beyond belief. 9/11 is imprinted on my brain and will never leave me. My heart goes out to everyone who lost their lives, their loved ones and all of the survivors of that terrible, terrible day.
heartbreaking post
I was only a 1 year old when it happened. But my mum had turned the TV on and was shocked an sickened by what she saw, it was 3 in the afternoon over in the UK at that time.
@@EuanWhitehead you are little older than my son Anders . He was in the womb that morning ( born late Oct 2001)
He would flip inside line a dolphin, ( different wife ) none my other 4 children did that . Had birth trauma , he very healthy
@@stevengriffin5349 Cheers, our generation has grown up with some real issues sadly, but there are many who live on to be successful.
bruh the US does a 9/11 level of causalties attack on a weekly basis.
tragedy for us and collateral damage for everyone else...
This blew my mind 14 years ago. Now my mind is blown by how far we have advanced 👍
What blows my mind is that they take the videos off they don't want you to see and they promote videos that fit the official narrative!
@@nunyabisnis1448 narrative bro lol I agree though check my wake up playlist
It's blown my mind today tbh.
Soo true man, this video seems like the stone ages but at the time it was legit!
@The Internetwanderer it's not mama America. It's the Zionist Zombies who did that to our beautiful little world!
Can u imagine being in the building. Looking out and seeing a big ass plane coming right at u. Seeing it blow through the building, dozens of people dying. And then just being stuck up there, unable to leave, eventually falling down with the collapse of the tower
yeah its crazy like, yoou know you cant run you just watch the plane and it either obliterates you or push you out the other side of the tower
it is terrible... except that there were no planes! It is one big lie. There were just explosions!
shut up you idiot
People disintegrated so fast and the heat was so much that pain wouldn't occur
Delusional...now you know what being delusional means...or do you? Of course not, when delusional it's you against the world.
Kinda alarming how much 9/11 content I'm getting recommended recently🌚
considering it was just 9/11, its not that alarming. Makes sense really
ikr??
I'm not a conspiracy theorist, but I have always wondered why they both fell the way they did. Seriously, I would like an answer for that.
Try to google "how buckling contributed to WTC collapse".
@@curiouscat8457 thank you.
And how did building seven pancake too when it wasn't even hit? Huh? Call me paranoid but I want an answer to that question. Come on! Answer!
@@robertpatterson3321 As you can see, Bob, your question is still far from being answered four months later. Not surprinsingly, since it's been around for no less than twenty years... The truth is uncomfortable for so many!
It’s called gravity. Here, take a hypothetical case. Say a building is, oh let’s say 1,368 feet tall. Then, let’s say open air sources like National Geographic says the building fell in ten seconds. You need the height of the building and time. The acceleration rate for an object falling through air, so long as the object is on planet earth, is 32 feet per second squared. When you do that for a building that is 1368 feet tall, you come up with 9.222 seconds. Towers 1 and 2 fell in 10 seconds. So the amount of resistance the buildings experienced is the difference between 10 seconds and 9.222 seconds. Not much resistance. Every nut, bolt, connections of every kind, must fail at the same time. So it wasn’t quite thin air with 0.778 seconds of resistance, but close. Remember the Maine? Gulf of Tonkin? Kind of like that but now going for One World, or at least when it comes to trade. Sincerely, Revelation 18:11.
They forgot to read or maybe they don’t believe it, but “they” should have heeded Proverbs 15:3. You’ll notice this verse says “eyes” plural. A police state’s god only has “one eye” right HAL 9000? That’s right, Dave. 2001 Space Odyssey. Made in 1968. That’s the year construction began on the Twin Towers and “call 911” was instituted. Coincidence? The God with two eyes knows…..Fight Club was made in 1999. Hope that helps answer your question. Romans4:25, Brian.
The simulation of the crash is impressive. How sad what happened, not only because of the loss of life, but also because of the demolition of the towers. I was 5 years old when it happened, so I don't remember the attack, but I know we were all glued to watching the television. Greetings from Argentina.
My mom is have 13 years old with is passed this tragedy
This is a cartoon. Do more research.
@@greatbriton8425 "This is a cartoon. Do more research." This is a physically accurate analysis of the events. Do even a tiny bit of research.
@@rodshop5897 🤣🤣🤣
@@rodshop5897 You don't even understand basic physics. How??
The plane, that is virtually made of aluminum, hits the second tower and cuts through a steel and concrete building, in tact, like a knife through butter, no wing or tail damage, but the plane that hits the Pentagon virtually disappears, engines and all, wings collapse, engines disintegrate, no seats, luggage, just disappears. You can't have it both ways and besides, both scenarios defy the laws of physics !
+bass man why do you copy and paste truther bullshit word for word? are you too fucked up to say shit in your own words?
+bass man well said.
If truthers are scum? What are liars? Fox News? World Trade Center building fell at the rate of gravity. Then NIST tried to deny it. When they were unable to deny it, they simply said that "they would go back to the drawing board on it" . Now, does that mean that they are compliant in the cover-up conspiracy?
Let me put it this way. If we woke up in the morning and I was the supreme leader of the world., I would have every member of NIST and their ebntire extended families flown to GITMO. And one by one we would find out everything they know.
If they denied the acceleration rate of gravity (and they did) then he'll yes they are in on it.
Give me the power to subpoena and to grant immunity and some reward money and I'll bring you the heads of everybody who was in on 911.
I'll bet my own head that I won't have a single Arab high jacked in the damn mix anywhere.
Then I'd start with the media. And Fox News, including the janitorial staff.
Isn't that excessive? Did you see those people jumping from the towers? Nothing is excessive. But, under my plan , not one innocent person would be harmed in any way. But I'd get every one of the guilty
Angela Leggerio
Debris was falling faster than the collapse at the speed of gravity dumb dipshit sheep. Wake up.
i totally agree with yr synopsis , i think of it this way - lets just say it was the building that was moving @ 500 mph , and the building hits a stationary plain , obviously the building would demolish the far less superior airoplain !! do u live in america friend ??
Time flies. Can't believe it was 22 years ago. It feels like it happened 19 years ago.
feels more like last week
Very informative, I can't even begin to imagine the horror those people went through on that fateful day, I live in Connecticut and remember driving home just after the second plane hit the tower, and while driving east bound I84, there was a plane embanking like it was turning around, I was thinking to myself is this the next one as I was listening to the radio and just announced a third plane went missing, ( the one that crashed into the Pentagon,) I never felt so scared in all my life. We shall never forget what happened on that day.
True
a cruise missile hit the pentagon, not an airplane.
@wnwlknsn Thank you, we all saw it on tv with our own eyes, how the hell does he come up with cruise missile.
@@daktarioskarvannederhosen2568 yeah, you keep watching Faux news, and the rest of us adults will watch the real news.
@@dianakibbe1885 you saw the detailed aftermath on tv didya? considering that no detailed aftermath was ever televised, i find that unlikely.
are you aware as to what rolls-royce's response was when they were asked for engine model details when given whatever details were available about the engine in the wreckage aftermath?
btw, i don't merely 'watch the news'.
I was 16 when this happened, during my 2nd Period Health Class Sophomore Year. I was in shock, had no idea what was going on, all assignments were cancelled and TVs were on showing what happened. Still didn’t know until I called my mom when I got home after school, my jaw hit the floor.
We still dont have an idea what was going on. The only thing we know is that the world has gone totally crazy after 9/11. The world is really upsidedown compared on how it was before 9/11.
Was made to shock.
@It doesn’t matter What your name is 👍
So the word wins the focking patriot act.
not a good sign. you saw images on tv and didn't know what you saw until your mommy told you what you saw? And the TV told her what she saw. What's the point of having eyes and a brain?
Reminds me of the bit in Titanic, when old Rose watches the CG video of the ship sinking and says "the experience of it was somewhat different."
Like the analogy ... and think I get what you mean; however, I believe this to be an accurate simulation of what went on on that horrific day, albeit it is impossble to simulate the terrible experience of actually having been there ...
@@bacchantedryad So you ran your own simulation and got similar results?
No, unlike the Titanic, the structure seem completely intact.
No, unlike the Titanic, the structure seem completely intact.
It might be extremely morbid but I've always had a big fasciation with seeing exactly what the impact looked like on those floors when the plane directly hit there. Not so much the smoke and carnage aftermath, just the sudden switch from normal to absolute chaos in a split second. And the likelihood that there is a big possibility that a person, or people, were hit directly by a burting apart airplane, when it first entered the building. Was there ever a feeling for them or was it so sudden that they didnt even have a chance to grasp? Also did anyone see the plane through the window right before the crash and try to run just from instinct? There are really a lot of morbid questions I have about 9/11 and I doubt I'm the only one. And unfortunately these questions will never be answered.
And as morbid as this might be, I think this is a big difference than when people want to see jumpers hit the ground just for the pure fasciation of watching people die. Or atleast thats what I tell myself.
Creep
@@kings5218 You've added tons.
Can jet fuel melt steel beams?
@@kings5218 No
@@NothingToPointOut24 you prolly weigh tons
Wow! steel I beams cut in two by aluminuim wings ! REALLY!
+Billy Allison why you posting that bullshit man
what the fuck is wrong with you?
+FemaCamp2016
Why did you drop your old troll name of FEMADEATHCAMPCONTROL?
+Billy Allison Not really into physics much are you?
+james lloyd You,re y tube profile has zero information on it! I wonder why?
Billy Allison Caught me. I'm a government agent.
Just like the old rose said in Titanic movie..in the beginning scenes ....
Thanks for your scientific explaination but the experience of it was much different
Can’t imagine how the real experience would’ve been. Being 1,000ft up, next to a burning inferno. When you’re in that position, the last thing you would think about is the scientific process of the impact.
It's sad to know whoever was above the plane crash were stuck & unable to get down :(
Inside
@@alexramirez5862 There were no planes Alex.
@@onumahobart8832
no there weren't. But the worst of it is that nobody seems to realize that this was a planned attack by the people who have owned the u.s. gov't and every other gov't on earth with the objective of using fear to gain more control over us all.
If we would all understand that, we could put an end to it. But the masses don't want to think about it. They don't want to get involved in their own destiny.
We are in the process of being wiped out. The only ones likely to survive will be the ones most ready to accept their slavery.
It's a sad commentary on the quality of the human soul.
One thing that most analysts neglect to include in the total collapse of the towers is that at the top of each tower was a 30 foot thick solid slab of formed concrete used as a ballast to combat swaying in the wind. It had so much mass that moving it back and forth was nearly impossible. However, once put into downward motion from the collapse of just one weakened floor, the mass of concrete would have nothing to stop it. The second plane was larger and weakened a few floors at a slightly lower level and so that building collapsed much faster. So, the ingenious feature to help stabilize the building in intense winds also helped to hasten its total collapse.
I wasn't aware of the counterweight of that size in the towers, but it doesn't surprise me. I remember watching a summary of the building of the Burj Khalifa, and that has an approximately 400 ft long counterweight structure in the building to counteract oscillations due to wind/quakes.
Imagine sitting in the building, just doing your work facing the window, and the only thing you see is a huge plane hurdling towards you at high speed…
Imagine being one of the passengers in the planes,as well ☹️
They would have both been the lucky ones instant for them alas the the people above the impact level there the ones that must have gone through hell before meeting there fate
Imagine being in the school on very same day and desperately waiting for this horrific news to come to let u make your own people fool with ur sugar coated words like ''Our country is under terrorist attack''.....r u freakin serious!!!! were u not the super power of the world?? then how could u not were able to stop that from happening. or may be u did want this to happen ,,didnt u ! 😏
"I picked the wrong week to stop sniffing glue."
and now imagine the same thing, just that you're sitting in Iraq and America is flying the plane :)
In 2005, 4 years after the attack, the government's own National Institute of Standards and Technolegy issued it's report. It stated out of the 236 outer columns 33 were damaged leaving 86% undamaged. NIST estimated 6 to 8 out of 47 core columns were damaged leaving 85% intact and undamaged. That is what's known as Minimal Damage. They found no scientific reason why or how these two towers fell.
They also found all materials used, welds,and bolts were above standards and no core column showed a temperature above 250 degrees. NIST never tested for residue from explosives or accelerates.
In 2008 Shyam Sunder of the NIST said about building 7 " The phenomenon that was saw on 9/11 that brought this particular building was really thermal expansion that occurs at lower temperatures".
Science demands a clear path for structural mass to accelerate at the rate of gravity, except on 9/11. Just what is this lower temp. thermal expansion that allows free fall speed ignoring load bearing continuous vertical support, floors of truss assemblies with carrier beams, lateral crosses, diagonal bracing, tens of thousands of welds and bolts, interior walls and partitions, office contents, 1 1/2" through 12"cast iron pipe, electric conduit, and all the other utilities to fall at the speed of gravity. If this new 'science' is now a known fact wouldn't we want to condemn all high rise buildings in places like L.A. and Phoenix? And to think there are people that believe this crap.
_"no core column showed a temperature above 250 degrees."_
Here's the full quote. You left out quite a bit there.
*"For columns HH and C-80, few areas of paint were observed (three to five spots per column) with no indication of temperatures over 250°C. Note that these core columns represent less than 1 percent of the core columns on floors involved with fire and cannot be considered representative of any other core columns."*
Mark H You speak of truther dishonesty, and yet you state your opinions as fact. The head of NIST has stated that NIST did not test for explosives residue. Your thinking that they did, does not make it so.
IXL2BW _" NIST did not test for explosives residue."_
You didn't read or didn't understand my post. They inspected the steel for failure signs and clues.... They did this at the scrap yards.... this would have included the EXTREMELY OBVIOUS damage from any explosives destroying the steel....
in fact had there been any damage from explosives it would have been so obvious that it wouldn't have been seen at ground zero when they were pulling it out.
We are not talking about what should have been done, we are talking about what was done or not done. And in this case, like I said before, the top guy at NIST said that they did not test for explosives. Look up the video "explosive evidence" and see for yourself. Your claims are not fact, only opinion.
IXL2BW Again you did not address... or did not understand my post.
It is very easy to make a graphical animation, what is difficult is an experimental demonstration. I can't imagine how the aluminum shell of a hollow tube could cut through steel columns as if they were made of cardboard.
Speed.
But speed does not make aluminum cut through steel on my lathe. But steel will cut through aluminum relatively in scathed.
@@jarebb1 It's not a hollow tube. It's actually well reinforced with structural ribs (kinda like a honeycomb). I do believe with enough velocity, the aluminum would be able to break through the steel. However, it is not possible to have damaged the entire foundational structure that would be needed to cause the building to collapse upon itself.
Playing cards in a hurricane
It is a finite element analysis simulation. FEA does consider the forces and material properties and forces involved. The "graphical animation" is meerly the output of the numerical simulation.
22 years later and I still remember it like it was yesterday. We have not forgotten.
@pippa3150, Apparently you did, or at least all New Yorkers did, years later they actually selected a Muslim, and turned tail and ran leaving billions in weapons to the enemy. Do you even know who the enemy was? Why did we attack two countries that had nothing to do with 9-11, so yes you forgot everything. Maybe you didn't even know to begin with what the real truth is. You should stop watching the criminal media for starters.
@@faithismespeaks6848 Islam didn’t commit 9/11. Terrorists did.
Vietnam or Iraq will never forget you're crimes against their humanity.
@@WiseFidelista, At least you get it, most sheeple still don't get it after we attacked 2 countries that had nothing to do with 9-11.
I still believe that it is impossible to completely bring the whole buildings down, no matter what.
I agree, especially in that manner. I really wanted to see an analysis of everything provided, how hot the beams would have been at the core for it to completely fold in on itself. I would think hot steel beams would just bend and if anything maybe it would come down at an angle not just completely disintegrate straight down..
especially when other planes hit other building before and never took them down. also buildings burned for hours and days and still never fell. these buildings fell as like it was with controlled demolition. just look it up on youtube, it's all there to see.
Did you know Osama was actually a structural engineer. Since the building was made out of steel beams with very little concrete, the steel does not have to melt to collapse, once it gets hot because of the fires, the weight above it will make the columns bend. This will cause all the weight above to come down and sort of form a domino effect. Every time a floor falls the total weight that's falling gets bigger, which caused what seemed like a controlled collapse.
The attack on the WTC also caused a giant change in skyscraper design, it is the main reason that these kinds of buildings are mostly made out of concrete centers at least
@@NFSGamerful we have seen many buildings burning for hours yet didn't fell, also can you explain why second tower which was hit fell before the first one if burning jet fuel was the reason for core collapse? Tower 1 went down after 45 minutes of burning. And also explain how WC 5 fell which was a bit away from WC 1 and 2 while the building just close by remained intact?
Only fools will believe this shit.
And btw OBL was not a architect or construction expert. He was millionaire who just inherited the construction business from his father. And his education was in economics and business administration. All the billionaire send their kids for same rather then some technical fields as they know their kids has to run the business, for technicalities they can hire cheap labour...
@@Spooferish, as we havbe seen many buildings fall after burning. Just ready the NIST World Trade Center Disaster Investigation report by yourself. WTC 5 didn't fall but WTC 7. There are several investigations about WTC 7 too.
It is important to read them yourself and not blindly follow the opinion of some RUclipsrs.
Most of them lie or leave out many details from the official investigation to make their story sound believable.
For example, *_none_* of the WTC buildings remained really intact. All of them were badly damaged, most of them so bad that they couldn't be repaired.
Just exactly how did the lower structure weaken when the fire was near the top?
If kerosene can melt steel, why do we have welding equipment. Also what caused Building 7 to collapse, it was untouched.
"Just exactly how did the lower structure weaken when the fire was near the top?"
-Hundreds of thousands of tons of building fell on it.
"Also what caused Building 7 to collapse"
-Fire
"it was untouched"
Wrong. It was struck be debris from the North tower.
Did those hundreds of tons weigh more after they fell than before?
@@wyoprospector No.
@ None of what you said is accurate and nobody cares about your idiot uncle's hearsay opinion.
On September 11, 2001, the structure was damaged by debris when the nearby North Tower of the World Trade Center collapsed. The debris also ignited fires, which continued to burn throughout the afternoon on lower floors of the building. The building's internal fire suppression system lacked water pressure to fight the fires, and the building collapsed completely at 5:21:10 pm
This does not explain how the central steel structure collapses in free fall motion ie. as if nothing is impeding / stopping the buildings collapse downwards because jet fuel does not burn anywhere hot enough to melt the steel supports or make the steel upright supports soft enough to give way so thoroughly & completely. The jet fuel would’ve quickly burnt up & not stayed hot long enough to have any effect on the buildings steel upright beams surrounding the central core as well as the outside steel frame supports. It just doesn’t make sense. The office & hydrocarbon fuel burns in open air ~500-1500F, yet iron or structural steel requires 2,700&. Then the entire buildings metal structure from top to bottom and from inside to outside need to be hot enough to melt and bend without cracking then to stay at elevated extreme temperatures for nearly one month before it would be cold enough to move to barges & be shipped to China as soon as possible for scrap metal.
Then there is the totally separate incident of Building 7 collapsing ~4pm from stray hot particles & “office fires” in a uniform manner as if one unit in complete freefall & no obvious heat !!!!!
Hollywood reproduced planes hitting buildings and exploding into flames a couple of times early in the 2016 movie Sully. We know that a lot of advancements of all sorts are withheld from public knowledge for indefinite periods of time. They never want us to know the exact extent of everything they are capable of doing. Yet here they are reproducing the exact same trauma inducing events in plain sight. It is not only possible but something that must be seriously considered especially as the “media” coverage was promoting the exact same long term storyline as events were unfolding. Plus the BBC aired pictures with Building Seven still standing later that day - in clear view - as they “reported” that it had collapsed -- and strangely it did totally collapse soon after and there is still footage of personnel clearing people from the streets & areas around Building Seven just prior to it collapsing from “office fires.”
This model makes no attempt whatsoever to explain building collapse. It covers about 1 second in time. Aircraft impact effects only.
Why I should have to explain that I don't know.
@@MFitz12because the conspiracy about building demolition is easy to digest than enough civil engineering knowledge to understand why it’s total bollocks
The reality the the buildings design required the exterior frame to be held in place as much as the interior frame needed it: and the once thousands of tons of building started to accelerate down by even a few cm - the inertia was unstoppable.
As to melted steel - it didn’t need to melt, it just got soft enough in the floor trusses.
The building was rated for a slow 707 on empty, (maybe) not a fully laden 737 doing 500 knots!
@@Ralnon - This video has nothing to do with building collapse, only aircraft impact. The OP does not seem to get that.
Which was my point.
Oh no, not a conspiracy.
Grenfell, a very low spec building, burned from top to bottom for about 12 hours and it still stands today.
Grenfell Tower wasn't hit by a plane with the energy of a ton of TNT, burned primarily externally and was made of reinforced concrete panels. More relevant examples would be Plasco Tower or Wilton Paes de Almeida.
People like you always ignore those.
Was it hit by a big airplane?
@@Moakmeister No, but the Empire State Building was in the 1940s. Are all the 1000s of structural engineers who say it was a controlled demolition wrong or conspiracy theorists?
@@artyinn1215 - Name 3
The worst was the people in building 1 who watched building 2 come down, realizing what would happen to them.
@@abandonedaccount123 yeah , I edited my comment
Looks like the channel owners deleted my other comment, maybe because someone reported it. This is why the terrorists attacked us because some people want to control what information is available .
@@waynelast1685 no lmao dude you’re being overly paranoid 🤣🤣🤣 RUclips sometimes automatically remove comments if its AI algorithm detects something it deems as inappropriate
@@jamostudios7596 no there was nothing really that bad. RUclips doesn’t remove comments but blocks comments with keywords. There was one woman making crazy comments but still I think we shouldn’t be in the practice of preventing anyone from speaking out even if we think it’s crazy or we don’t like it.
@@waynelast1685 yeah I can agree with that sometimes I put effort into writing a comment only to realize it got auto filtered, which is frustrating
Many of you seem to be missing the point that this is a scientific simulation, this was never expected to look like some kind of Hollywood movie. It's not meant to simply look realistic or "pretty". This was made to better understand the damage and events involved in the collision.
I blame video games
Like who exactly?
Of course not . A very professional demolition job . It must of took weeks to rigged these buildings?
Many of you seem to be missing the point that aluminium cutting steel like a hot knive cutting butter, is physically imposible.
You might think you're crazy for reading this but rest assured that there are many more than the millions of Americans and the 958 links posted here that don't think you're crazy. They think it's about time you got the insight to just look a little more closely at the convenient cavalcade of coincidences and unexplained facts, studies, observations and inconsistencies in the ' Official ' 9/11 story.
You might think I'm crazy to suggest that the 9/11 attacks were planned, schemed and executed Black-Ops military exercise disguised as war games, based on a plot perpetrated by the PNAC; copied from Operation Northwoods, and managed by PNAC signator Cheney; who, in an unprecedented move had himself placed solely in charge of five war games exercises involving hijacked planes at the exact same time the WTC attacks were occurring and who had also; three months beforehand, in another unprecedented move been put in charge of all NORAD military responses in the event of any attack though when asked, he lied and claimed it was the President who had to make any decisions about responses; but he was inaccessible; cowering in a room full of 8 year olds and he didn't want to alarm them, ( how conveeenient ) ; and instead of being whisked out of there, he stayed, and stared into space like a stunned rabbit, making nervous jokes, chewing on his lip, tucked away deliberately out of reach of the press; ( yet somehow still managing to put his foot in his mouth ) while
people jumped to their deaths from the burning, undefended, WTC Twin Towers.
Just ask ONE question.
" How did ALL THREE of those buildings just fall more or less straight down,
from a paper and office furniture fire; two at freefall speed and the other IN A VACUUM !! ? "
Or better yet; " WHY??!! "
This page does NOT presume to have answers; rather present material supporting the questions.
If you don't feel like reading, just scroll down the list or go to pictures of 9/11 .
FIRST read #335.
Now let me run my findings by you and see how they settle.
Uniform, universal, symmetrical, total collapse at WTC 1, 2 & 7 from fires that were localized
and mostly OUT. THIS is a myth; #21
If you see or watch the videos or images of the towers you'll notice that one of them, the south tower had a chunk begin to fall in a huge section, that dissolved before it hit the ground. #13
By the imagery of any prior pancake collapse a large section of this building should have
been left in a pile at the bottom, given that it supposedly fell in one piece.
However, NO trace of this huge section was even visible after it went into the cloud of dust.
"I don't think the current administration has the political capital to pull this off anymore."
I don't suppose that $2.3 TRILLION reported missing on 9/10/01 #717 might have been available ?
Or $167 BILLION #400 that went missing from the basements after 9/11 ?
Or the pallets of cash that vanished in Iraq ?
"I don't see how Bush/Cheney could have brought those families into the conspiracy."
Can't you imagine ? Look at the passenger manifests.
The list of weapons experts, high tech computer guys, retired military all conveniently ' disposed of'
so that they can go to their new covert lives as underground covert experts with new identities.
Pentagon discrepancies; #25, & #26, #273 can you imagine the absolutely UN-likelihood of the CIA planning an attack on 9/11, as well as five war games being effected of jets crashing into the WTC towers on 9/11 and THEN having it actually HAPPEN ??!!
#298 with #896 pdf., #897, #513, #448, #538, #545, #547
And if you haven't looked at any material regarding cell phones in planes; They DO NOT WORK
Go to # 372, #909 #928
and about the cell calls by Barbara Olsen ............
........" Barbara Olson's phone calls are the most suspicious because she supposedly called twice and the person who we have to take their word for that she made these two phone calls is her husband, Ted Olson, who is the United States Solicitor General. Ted was one of the lawyers who successfully represented George W. Bush at the Supreme Court in December 2000, stopping the Florida recounts and guaranteeing Bush the White House victory. He also has admitted to the Supreme Court that the U.S. government lies! So, one has to wonder if Ted Olson was part of the conspiracy and simply lied about her calling him. Also, it was reported that Barbara called Ted collect even though it was reported that she called from a cellphone. Ted Olson claimed that she said the hijackers used boxcutters, which is the only source that the hijackers used them......." AND #340, #329 ( if it doesn't load try )
FBI Admits: No Evidence Links 'Hijackers' to 9-11 #491, #501, #511
South Tower Discrepancies #35, #299
and those " terrorist's ? " ( G.I.'s) #519
passengers, #548
alternate theory, #614
I don't doubt that Muslims hate us.
I hate us. The Ugly American is alive and well and living in the hatred of the world, and for this rank and putrid reputation, I hate everyone who lies, cheats, steals or murders for capital gain.
BUT you just aren't trying here;
19 Muslims did NOT get onto jets and NOT be on the passenger lists.
9/10 turned up alive, so that proves that anyway.
10 Muslims did NOT shut down NORAD, Cheney did.
Three steel re-inforced buildings did NOT fall at 10 floors per second from kerosene
( jet fuel ) fires; they were demolished.
A 757 did NOT crash into the Pentagon nor at Shankesville, NOR WTC 7.
IF they had, there would have been photos all over the world for years !!
THERE ARE no PHOTOS !!
Mark Bingham did NOT call his mother from a cell phone on a plane and say to her,
" Hi, Mom, this is your son, Mark Bingham "
Try to use some investigative intelligence here.
And remember;
ONE flaw in the Official story deminishes credibility in the ENTIRE story.
WHY would the FBI confiscate all the evidence?
WHY would the FBI destroy air traffic controller tapes?
WHY isn't the FBI even looking for Osama ?
I was there! I visited New York and got into the World Trade Center in 1999, in a hot evening. Almost nobody in the lobby, and I took the elevator to the top floor, to a place called The Greatest Bar on Earth (it´s probably the Windows on the World restaurant). I even remember I got a salmon fish sandwich and fries, and met an Asian lady who was actually German! If you´re reading this please let me know, it would fantastic to find you.
Then everybody danced the twist... it was amazing.
Cars in the streets were tiny dots down below... I CANNOT IMAGINE FALLING FROM THERE. It is beyond my imagination.
Where you the one that posted a video on RUclips? Of World Trade Center....
Ive been there too m8, i went there with my girlfriend in January 2000, up in the lift to the 'windows of the world' cafe/restaurant, the lift (elevator) was really fast i remembered...but yh, looking down from up there was pretty scary, i think they had them floor to ceiling windows aswell so it seemed worsre when u looked down.....ive still got a framed panoramic picture of the twin towers and N.Y. up in my living room at home in England.....i watched the t.v. for about 2 days solid when the attack happened....
Love to all the victims of 9/11......peace....🤘🤘❤❤
the first 109 1/2 floors are easy.
@@jakeweisenberg3097 No, I never posted anything related.
@@andybennett3736 How great! So cool that you have this picture... at the time there were no cellphone cameras and I didn´t bother enough to bring my SLR Nikon, unfortunately.
Wow, who knew thin sheet aluminum could totally cut through and destroy structural steel and concrete. Airplanes must REALLY be strong. Notice the large hole in the perfect shape of an airplane on the side of the building, this is solid proof how strong they are. I’m sure any aircraft design engineer could corroborate this. It reminds us of the old Roadrunner cartoons when Wiley Coyote would run through solid rock and leave the perfect outline of his body, totally believable. Imagine repurposing airplane wings somehow for high rise building demolition.
Less about object strength and more about speed and weight. The plane was more or less disintegrated on impact. However get any heavy object moving fast enough and you can punch through anything.
You could punch a hole through 12 feet of concrete with a sock if it was moving fast enough. The energy of a moving object is equal to the MASS of that object (not material strength) multiplied by the SQUARE of the velocity.
So while aluminum wings are much softer than steel beams, they could absolutely inflict enough damage to sever them at high speeds.
By your logic anything stronger than an aluminum can will deflect a plane hitting it at any given speed. Think before you post. Kudos to the responses above mine.
@@devinpol4258 top comment is what happens when people who don't understand physics try to wax poetic on physics. I'm an idiot and even I know there is more to the equation of airplane vs skyscraper than the material strength of the individual parts involved in the collision.
@@matthewhale1572
Absolute horseshit. When my 223 exits the barrel of my AR, it flies at more than 3,200 feet per second. It can easily penetrate, wood, concrete and thin sheets of steel BUT WILL NOT penetrate my 1/2 steel target. An airplane is a hollow aluminum can and cannot penetrate through 3” thick steel beams regardless of how fast it’s moving. How many buildings we’re supposedly hit by planes at TWC that morning? Two but three buildings collapsed at free fall speed with tons of debris being ejected sideways at certain instances which is an absolute scientific impossibility. Keep believing guys who lived in caves and couldn’t pilot a Cessna aircraft managed to successfully pilot a commercial airline and fly it in a manner even the most skilled pilot cannot pull off. I wish people would think critically instead of just believing what the TV tells them.
I wasn't in NYC, DC, or PA, I was just at work in a warehouse near Detroit. You don't really notice how used to certain noises you are until they're simply not there. Every day it's normal to hear airliners fly overhead constantly there, it's an approach to Detroit metro airport, but that day it was eerily silent and something felt very off about it, I just knew something was wrong. I didn't see what was going on until I got home from work since that warehouse didn't allow people in or out, and nobody really had radios or anything in there. Only thing in the sky was fighter jets, so high up you couldn't really hear them at all, just see the lights on them. It was so f*cked up seeing those people jump out of desperation live on tv, I'll never forget that day. It was also messed up when the east coast blackout hit soon after, that shit was crazy too.
911 in NYC taped a call of a man calling FDNY .
THEY put it on RUclips.
He was on the 86th floor..or above it..😢
RUclips later took it off
Fart
I called in sick that tuesday morning. I just got home from the store, the first plane had already hit. I thought it must've been an accident. Then I 💩 my pants when I watched the second plane hit the other building. I knew then that it was no accident.
@@trxtech3010 Bout as funny as my foot up your ass eh.
@@trxtech3010 you’re a horrible person.
This is incredibly interesting. My dad was an engineer and I'm always fascinated by this kind of analysis.
Watching that second plane hit live on tv was insane.
It looked for all the world like CGI technology in a disaster movie...horrifying.
In that moment hundreds of people died and the fate of hundreds more was sealed, yet you can't see from the footage. It has an abstract quality, but it's highly disturbing.
@@laxeystu8096 It's just fiction. Don't let it bother you.
The airplane image is superimposed on a video of a real event which killed a bunch of people, but there was no airplane involved. Better to not associate their deaths with your illusion of what happened. An illusion that could only come from your unhealthy relationship with the idiot box (the TV) that you should throw out.
@@lebergerdesphotons4565 what are you even trying to say.
@@ryan3999 what are you even trying to say.
I can't respond to that because I don't see your original comment in the thread, so I can't know what you're talking about. Personally I always copy the text of the comment I'm reacting to into the new comment. That avoids the other having to engage a perhaps futile search for the information necessary to participate in the conversation.
So if you would care to ask me a question with enough information in it to permit me to repsond I will happily respond.
Cool. Now do a simulation of Epstein not killing himself.
Why don't you act it out yourself and see how it goes?
@@MFitz12 I did. It worked. Im dead
You, sir, rule!
I farted
Elan Danks thanks Elan
Interesting how fiberglass/aluminum cuts through steel reinforced structure...just proves that it was an inside job
No wonder trump loves the poorly educated, as trump calls his supporters,...
My dad passed away on my mom’s birthday on July 20, 2001. Two months before the attacks I was still in elementary school 😔
General GTA I’m 29 now
Andrew Fontanez god bless
General GTA no I don’t I had to put my life on hold for awhile to take care of my grandma with my mom
@General GTA Whatcha bench?
God has received his soul.
ok, and now ad the parameter, airplane is made of aluminium and plastic, and the building is made of concrete and steel. this was made by some student with phisical knowgledge based on hollywood
And anyone with actual scientific knowledge know that the kind of material doesn't matter is you have enough speed.
Even water can cut through steel...
Robin447
aight. so hit concrete with your head fast enough and tell us what did happen.
Robin447
dont calculate. take a run up and slam your head into a concrete wall at 20 mps. cmon doit. aluminium doesnt cut iron
911crashtest.org/
Samuel Trajano
Conclusion : A hardened steel blade will be completely disintegrated by a largely less hard concrete barrier if it impact it with enough speed.
My point is still valid.
14 years ago: state of the art
Now: this game looks like crap
Funny how we both ended up here today
@@jsforce77 Yea 2007 youtube. RUclips was only 2 year old..and this guys talked what happened 6 years ago.Now it's 20 years wow since that terrorist attack.
This needs to be simulated on Beam.NG drive
The first Matrix movie is from 1999, just saying...
@@OrlandoMGarcia and while they are at it also see what happens when that stunt bus crashes into it at full speed
Were we actually this antiquated in CGI, 16 years ago? This "top of the line" simulation looks like something out of the 1960's, compared to now.
Anyone else high-key skeptical that many of us got this video recommended all at the same time? I get that it’s a week after the 20th year, but it seems very odd to have so many people get recommended this video 14 years after it was posted.
Yeah pretty suss. I’ve still never understood how an aluminum plane can punch a cartoon like hole into a steel building.
@@Nightwizard7979I bet there's lots of things you don't understand.
@@UberKrispy good one
9/11 is trending now because it's 20 year anniversary. You couldn't figure that out?
@@UberKrispy wait it is. Omg I had no idea
My God, those poor people on those floors didn’t have a chance. May they rest in peace.
What about the people on the plane ? Everyone’s mentioning the people in the towers but not the people on the planes .
@@OhitzHurr.x_x what about the 60 steel workers who died building the WTC in the 70'? nobody talks about them..
What about the people who died manufacturing the steel for the WTC? Nobody talks about them...
"Thank you for that fine forensic analysis, Mr Bodine. Of course, the exprerience of it... was somewhat different."
Good reference
Somewhat untrue
UHUH , and tell me again what caused Building 7 to come down ? Nothing hit it !
Title of video: *Scientists simulate jet colliding with World Trade Center*
Delivers exactly what it says on the tin and nothing else. If you still need Building 7 - possibly the most studied engineering disaster in history - explained to you in 2023 then I feel sorry for your parents.
Don't worry about something like this anymore
The new buildings we are working on are made with middle East passports
That material is incredibly strong!
itsghost boi Lol...I shouldn’t laugh, but I know exactly what you’re talking about. Hopefully, they’re built better than building 7.....that didn’t even get hit! 👍🏼
itsghost boi Has
Spot on.
You're a bunch of idiots !!!! I feel sorry for your parents.
thats a good one. Lol
My hope is that it happened so quickly and those poor people did not suffer. I can't even begin to imagine how difficult it has been for the family members of those who died. It's so horrible there are no words. Rest in love and eternal Peace ❤
The airplane was going between 500-600 mph they wouldn’t have felt or known a thing
Did not happen this way the the Twin Towers were demoed and the new type of energy weapon was used to bring them down
Все самое тяжёлое приходит именно к family members. А им совсем не тяжело, мгновенная смерть.
In accident situations our self quickly separated from our bodies. We're aware but in split seconds we jump out of our bodies and never feel a thing but those who maybe got trapped somewhere else in the incident unfortunately and didn't die in a moment notice they sat w pain eventually once shock wares away and reconnect w reality of something terrible happened but what.. dose this help?
Idk... I watched a video about the people inside the towers calling their loved ones
May all the victims Rest In Peace.
jet fuel doesnt burn hot enough to melt steel... explosives were used to bring them down
Who would have thought that aluminum could be so destructive?
It wasn’t. Those buildings were bombed from within. You can thank George w Bush.
It's like when you see a 2X4 going through brick during a tornado- velocity and force.
@@rowlandloewen5300 they werent can you explain your reasoning?
@@uuproverlord8324 thermite in the air and molten metal pools.
New construction methods are utilizing Saudi Arabia passport bindings instead of steel for strength.
Any computer simulation on how the passports survived? Not trolling, just curious
Jet fuel can't melt passports but can pulverise all wtc
picobumble how do your social security cards or cash survive a washer and dryer
Proud volunteer by not being in a plane crashing into a building
G H About as 'retarded' as the consensus of experts in every relative field, but you know better ;)
The passport was ejected by the blast as is common for paper products due to their high surface density. Passports survive plane crashes all the time. There would also be no need whatsoever to plant this passport as the guy was on the flight manifest.
Giulio florio1993 Jet fuel only ignited the fires. They were sustained by the contents of the buildings. We have many examples of passports survivng airliner crashes so this is nothing overly unusual.
We will always be grateful for the heroic efforts of the FDNY, NYPD and first responders who acted selflessly and gave their lives to help others on that day. Many have since died and continue to die from 9/11 related illness as a result of the inhalation of toxic dust from Ground Zero 🙏🏽
You can't forget that the left wants to "defund" the police, so they on the left seem to have no gratitude to the NYPD...
@@ThetOLogrin - typical....bring politics into it.🙄 The "defund" issue hit the headlines with the George Floyd incident almost 20 years later. I'm certain ALL sides of the political spectrum in 2001 had so much gratitude to not only the NYPD, but every other first responder.🥰
I am from California and liked to sport an attitude about people in New York, but after 9-11 I am in awe of the great people who live there.
Just remember, nz was devastated by this, we will always think about those who lost their lives
@@ThetOLogrin it wont happen, every country needs law and order
It is incredible that an aluminum plane broke the steel beams of the best in history capable of withstanding more than 300 degrees, the thermite explosive makes no noise
Have MythBusters explored this topic?
its unbelievable that even the wings dont break off
+Steven Bee
The 767's were about 1/3 filled with fuel at time of impact Steven.
Steven Bee
I think you are stretching the limits of credibility with that pop can vs solid wall of titanium Steven. What do you mean a solid wall? Is that solidly front to back or side to side. How far was that titanium wall solid for? Was it 12 feet thick solid or was it 4 miles thick solid? How fast do you think you can propel a pop can before it vaporizes from friction with air? How would you devise a plan to propel this can to the necessary velocity to penetrate this wall of unspecified thickness?
look at crashtests,they brake off,there thin
+Steven Bee
Nobody is interested in your scientific gobeldygook Stepen. I've done years of internet reaserch and have made my findings public, proving that it was a false flag. You deflecting only serves to prove that your a paid shill, probably at the behest of the powerful Jews at the controls.
No Steven, the screen name you replied to was a sock puppet that
duplicates other user's accounts. Maybe if you exercised a bit of due
diligence by checking into the accounts of these cretins that call you
names, you might just put these attacks into perspective.
I worked a five minute walk from the Trade Center on that day, witnessed everything. I only wish that day and what I saw could be somehow erased from my memory...
Google is erasing the truth as much as possible. WTC 7 fell at free fall speeds. NOTHING hit the building. It was never even mentioned in the final commissioners report. The governments report. WHY? Does the government truly believe that humans are that ignorant? We all still go about our daily lives every day as if we all take what they tell us as the truth.
You will be waiting a Very Long time to have anything erased about anything to do with the limits the American Government will go to.
Sorry to hear that
You witnessed history, thats all, please dont make this bother you, life goes on, have your family i your mind, thats more important, good luck to you
@@benjy117 Pls dont be a conspiracy idiot ...
No... I'm sorry, but in no way do I buy this. Aluminium that has been completely obliterated and destroyed from the impact cannot slice and cut through solid steel like that.
Yeah, because jet airplanes are built entirely from aluminum... :D
@@MrKredski A Boeing 767 is made primarily of Aluminium and composite materials.
Speed = kinetic energy
@@Nobodyelsehasthishandle - all the internal structure as well?
@@MrKredski except the landing gear, yes. Do your research.
Never, nowhere has aluminum been able to cut through steel I beams.
Good thing there were no steel I-beams then. Probably why the real event actually happened the way we all saw and why this model is so close to _what actually happened_
This is why in science and engineering we rely on _true facts_ rather than baseless assumptions.
Just imagine what felt all these people looking through the windows and seeing the airplanes that are about to wipe them out... :(
It was actually internal blasts that downed these towers
I'm thinking that probably most weren't even looking out the windows when the 1st plane hit. Why would they be? They didn't know it was gonna happen so therefor most were probably just getting settled in for their days work....Bur I'm sure there were at least a few who happened to look out and see it coming.......I just can't imagine being in anyones shoes there that day!
Just image those innocent people who were bombed like animals in Iraq and Afghanistan
Imagine being in the plane & going through all those beams before it blew up
@@nadershah4845 yeah, that's bullshit too. But does it make the killings of the innocent people in the twin towers any better? Can't we be sad for both?
I was there that morning in NYC and witnessed everything except the impact of the first plane in the North Tower which I observed no less than 3 or 4 minutes after impact. Changed my whole life forever.
You are necessarily full of shit. There were no planes. The evidence? No plane debris. No wingtip vortices visible in the smoke.
Wow, you were there? How cool is that?
I have a Mustang with a jet engine in it, and the chicks really dig me.
@@dannymccarty344 YOu have no scruples. Mocking lying sacks of crap. You know they're too stupid to understand.
@@lebergerdesphotons4565 I don't have what?
I pick up chicks and they all want to sleep with me. I drink Mt Dew in cans.
@@dannymccarty344 Is the jet engine cargo or is it installed as the motor for the car? Is mountain dew available in bottles?
I still can’t wrap my head around how a plane that crashed into the building towards the top of the building can cause the huge I beams toward the ground to fail. It seems like the columns under the damage would be fine. Above the damaged columns would definitely fail.
Fine? With thousands of tons of debris falling on them?
There were no I Beams. Start with how the Towers were actually built.
The buildings were demolished .
Have you seen what happens to aluminium when it's on fire and you pour water on it? Water from the sprinkler system in the building must have been pouring.
ruclips.net/video/hRO7bU-If5s/видео.html
@@petervankas1352 By the CIA and Mossad who financed and conned the Saudi patsy pilots to commit this atrocity! It was an inside job! Don't believe it? What about building SEVEN??? Never hit but went into FREE FALL! We have been duped and lied to! Suckers all!
I like the way aluminum skin from the plane can cut through all those two inch thick steel columns. The plane was a hollow aluminum tube structure.
Ever heard of inertia and momentum? You can get killed by a tomato if said tomato is thrown fast enough. Even though your head in comparison is much more rigid than a tomato.
I would like to see a visualization of the actual collapse
Cameras from a distance show no airplane, only an explosion on the second building hit. On Micheal Jaco September 14 ?
Schizos in replies are always fun to see.
Good luck.
Just look up a demolition video of a city block
@Qmies your ignorance is hillarious. You 911 truthers are so ignorant you border on just strait up stupid. Id recommend education but your stupidity prevents such a notion..
I sh** you not as soon as the dude said “notice the oscillations” there was an earthquake about 10 miles from my house that shook my whole house back and forth. Crazy coincidence.
that was the El , mate. those damned trains are horrendous , every hour on the hour , broke me mamma's good china they did
@@carmineredd1198 haha . was just a 4.5 earthquake in carson, CA. on the 17th of September. but the epicenter was so close to my house it shook the sh** out of it
As a machinist and welder there's no way an aluminum paper thin airplane cut through 24×24 steel I beams
OK, but what if there were no 24x24 steel beams? Because,... well,.... there weren't. What there was were 14x14 hollow box columns welded up from 9.5mm A36 plate, then bolted together.
@@MFitz12 how did the wing and tail tips not break off? The simulation makes the WWC look like it was made out of butter
@@bday55 Because they wouldn't. Why do you assume they would? Reality always beats your false starting assumptions
@@MFitz12 are you s structural engineer? planes are made of aluminum, I can see the engine ripping thru but the lighter exposed wing tips and rudder/elevators? I have an Airframe and Powerplant license, Pilot License and I'm a very amateur welder.
@@bday55 Again, you are relying on false starting assumptions about your expectations rather than facts.
16 years ago, this definitely took some serious computing power back then.
fr
I would love for someone to simulate this again using modern technology, it would be interesting to see the level of detail available to simulate now
there are people working on that right now
@@MrProlantern how do you know
What would be interesting is if they made a simulation of the building falling under controlled demo 👀🤯
@@MrProlantern where
@@marcusanderson7880 i do know that the building collapsed due to the failure of the core structure, that would be interesting if they made a simulation where they placed explosives at the bottom of the building
The day that three buildings collapsed in the exact same way as each other after being hit by two planes.
No they didn't. There are significant differences between the collapses of the two Twin Towers even though they were both of identical design and hit by the same type of plane. The collapses of Building 3, 4, 7 and St Nicholas Church were all completely different.
@@MFitz12 why waste your time trying to educate someone that is clearly a moron??
you are just too dumb to understand, so you're clinging to stupid theories :D
Demolition job all rigged prior to the day
mm hmmm interesting.
we have simulated it the way we wanted it thank you
Is there a problem with the Purdue model? If so, what? Be specific and show your work.
@@MFitz12 For starters, how about the wiley coyote imprint of the plane on the building. Too funny. Even funnier is the 2 or more angles showing the nose of the plane come out the other side. Comedy.
No debris at all at the point of impact, the plane just melts into the building? (In the simulation and on video that day).
Have you watched videos on the construction of the twin towers AND the construction of an airplane??? I have.
Did you see the fire ball explosion after the plane disappeared into the building??.....so did I, that was jet fuel right...one big fire ball released and ignited all at once right? Right, I agree. So........what melted steel then? There is video of molten steele literally pouring out of the building. It's a video documented fact. So.......what melted the steel if all the jet fuel exploded during the impact? Office furniture and drywall????
Many other high rise buildings around the world have burned for much much longer and didn't collapse. Why is that? How did a handful of collapsed floors fall and pancake 70+ otherwise undamaged floors? THEN AGAIN, TWICE IN ONE DAY????
No wait, a 3rd!!!!!!! And the third building wasn't hit by a plane??
Too many questions, with too many bad answers.
@@leopardcubpupkryky6940 - 1. So your first objection is that an aircraft impact makes a damage pattern the size and shape of the aircraft???? I struggle to understand why this is a problem. Would you prefer the impact damage be in the shape of a bus? A train?
2. Neither of the aircraft which struck the Twin Towers "melted" into anything. Given their immense mass and velocity they had sufficient energy to penetrate the thin cage that was the perimeter of the towers - which was easily penetrated by light i.imgur.com/hJdqzcp.jpg and mostly air by volume. For the vast majority of us who have at least a vague understanding of how energy works there is nothing particularly surprising about this.
During the impact process the aircraft were both converted into millions of tiny bits. They did not melt into the building. They were violently shredded. The streets of Lower Manhattan were absolutely littered with aircraft debris, human remains, etc. What do you see here; cryptome.org/info/wtc-punch/pict8.jpg
Or here; cryptome.org/info/wtc-punch/pict33.jpg
3. The jet fuel was burned off within about a minute, It acted as an accelerant. There was no melting of steel. Can't believe I still have to address that steaming pile of stupid in 2021. They need to start teaching metal shop class in high school again.
4. The video you speak of does not show molten STEEL. You want it to be molten steel so you assume it is, but you have no actual proof and because you are a conspiratard who hust mindlessly copies other peoples bad ideas you did not put in the due diligence to figure out that mych of the debris from Flight 175 was pushed up into that exact spot AND that location also housed a large backup battery farm for one of the resident banks. Large quantities of loose lead and aluminum. Far more likely candidates to explain an anomaly that is clearly not relevant to collapse initiation mechanisms anyway.
5. What STEEL FRAMED high rise building have burned for LONGER than the Twin Towers AFTER suffering catastrophic PHYSICAL DAMAGE from the HIGH SPEED IMPACT of 117 TONS OF JUMBO JET?
Yeah, you left that last part out. I noticed.
Shouldn't have, but you did. It might have been deliberate but in my experience conspiracy believers are single-element thinkers. This is why they can not grasp something as complex as Twin Tower collapses. Too many elements. What brought down the Twin Towers was the combination of Impact Damage + Fire + Time + Gravity. That's 4 (four) elements. Take any one of those out of the equation and there is no collapse.
You only mentioned one element; fire. Completely left out the other 3. No wonder you can not grasp Twin Tower collapses.
6. Did you know that when you say "the third tower wasn't even hit by a plane" that is tacit admission that a plane can bring down a building?
that's why you are one of millions of you tube superstar commentators that are certainly not unique and commenting on stuff way way above your pay scale in the first place. It truly is as simple as that . But your stuck behind a screen and at least your harmful only to yourself, just as long as you remain there and not get to adventurous with your "intellect" lol
@@MFitz12 People always forget the GRAVITY part.
So, the aluminum wings cut through the outer steel columns like butter.
There were just explosions, no planes
On a building that was engineered to withstand a direct hit from aircraft, at that. And then not a trace found afterwards, other than random parts from aircraft not matching the purported aircraft in question. Then there's WTC 7, that just fell inside of itself...
I don’t know if this simulation took into account the explosives plated in the building.
@@dylandavidson1709 I mean, it's an easy thing to miss.
@@livestock9722 yeah...not too much to care about
Amazing how the human element can be extracted so cleanly; to a mathematical and technical certainty.
Would you please elaborate? I'm not sure at all of what you're saying. Thanks.
@@lebergerdesphotons4565 I am and you will never. Maybe you should buy a flashlight.
@@Noitisnt-ns7mo Ok. Thanks for the confirmation of what I suspected. That you're a useless turd with nothing to say. Just a fake ego that only you believe in. All others who've been peripherally involved in your life have already understood how useless you are so now you seek out new dupes on youtube. I hope you find what you need without bothering too many people.
@@lebergerdesphotons4565 I think what Roman was trying to say was that this video focused solely on the technical aspect of the impact and ignored the human side, i.e. the great suffering, loss of life, and emotional scarring. For many people, talking about one without mentioning the other is abhorrent. This was such a great tragedy that not touching on the human side feels like an affront or an insult to all those affected. However, in order to truly understand most things, we must be able to remove emotion from the equation since it risks creating a bias. This is a very difficult thing for most people to do.
@@lebergerdesphotons4565 Demolition.