Well Rolex does use REAL gold for markers and hands. Rolex does make the best bracelet in the business. Also they make their own metal as 904 does feel different and less corrosive. So there is a big difference. With that being said, I just bought a new Omega to go with my Rolex’s. You can like both brands! 🤷🏼♂️
Awesome video mate. I am only A$400 away from picking up my Sapphire Sandwich which they are holding whilst I pay it off. Super excited for my 50th Birthday present to me.
My first Speedmaster was the Sapphire. It was nice to see the movement thats for sure...but the more i saw Hesalite models, the more i realised that aesthetically they are superior. There is some vintage charm with having that smooth domed crystal, giving it a warm feel and unparalled beauty dial side. I ended up selling my Sapphire Sandwich for hesalite sandwich. Best of both worlds, beauty at the front and the back. Now i couldnt be more happier
Bruce; A beautiful presentation, as usual. The Speedmaster Professional Moonwatch has long been a grail watch for me. I love the authenticity of the Hesalite version however, when one is to spend this much on your grail, the Sapphire Sandwich with its exhibition case back and the 1863 movement is extremely tempting. Something to think about as I save up the funds for my own grail watch. Thank you for the "heads up" regarding the upcoming movement upgrade. I personally feel that the $6350 with its $1000 premium is about the most that I would feel comfortable spending. PS; The date of this post just happens to be my birthdate, maybe that's a secret code for me to "pull the trigger" sooner rather than later. It certainly helps my justification to "take the leap" (LOL). Best wishes from one true watch fanatic to another!
100% SS fan (and owner). Came down to durability/scratch resistance and the upgraded movement in display. I have the bracelet for summer and two croc deployant straps (one black and one gray). Looks luxurious on both. The only watch I own that has been recognized and given props (by a guy wearing a gold Yachtmaster).
Hey BW, I have to agree with you. The ability to be able to see that movement is superb in the sandwich. Personally I love both for very different reasons, but I suppose at the end of the day, you really only need one. That sandwich is superb. Good choice..
Iv has my sapphire sandwhich for two years now and I only notice the smoky ring when others on RUclips point it out. You get used to it very quickly and I actually prefer the smaller height and less excessive bubble form from it. I don’t have to worry about scratches and I get to see that beautiful movement in action. The whole argument that the sapphire didn’t go to space is ridiculous because that acrylic they are buying did not go to space either. One or the other is not going to get you “closer” to the original simply because it will never be the original
It is indeed a “legendary” timepiece! That classic look will never get old! Since I am sucker for this beauty I went with heselite version! Box is also amazing, just like an icing on the cake! 😉
I did buy my Speedy Pro five years ago. I went for the Hesalite! And to be honest it was pretty clear for me as the Sapphire version was 1500€ more expensive after discounts. So I didn't really think about it any longer. But still, I'm very happy with my past decision. I love the distortion of the Hesalite crystal as well as the beautifully domed shape of it. I also prefer the writings on the closed caseback compared to the Sapphire. The outer metal ring with all the text looks to cluttered for my taste. I think within the watch community this decision is pretty much a perfect balance =) Great comparison Bruce, thanks! All the best from Germany, Daniel
For watches with domed or raised crystals, you should list also the case height to the top of the bezel since the crystal is so light relative to the case.
Hi Bruce just looking back at this & how right you are with the prices. I have a Sapphire Sandwich on let’s say leather deployment & I ❤ it more every time I wear the watch. One of my all time favourites. 👍
The hesalite version is for the WIS romantic who fell in love with the historical connection and significance of the Speedy while the sapphire version is for the more practical watch collector to whom the Speedy is a tool watch, nothing more. Your mileage may vary.
Hey what are your thoughts on white dial or "great white" seamaster 300m? Will it drop in price, or the opposite? I'm purchasing sapphire sandwich soon but itching for an SMP white really bad but don't want to make a wrong move by purchadint too many omegas:) thanks, and BTW great video
Nice review. I’ve owned the sapphire version for years. I was on the fence, but the thinner profile and scratch resistance of the glass made it a better choice as a daily driver. One thing to add to your review might be the cost of ownership. Servicing these watches isn’t cheap. Omega currently charges $850 USD.
Im love the way the dial looks through hesalite, but to the 1863 is the sapphire which more durable and it is reasonable for daily use so for me i would buy the 1863.... if its compare with the 321, then its another topic of choice.
Hesalite looks nicer if I'm honest. It has more charm. One of the greatest watch designs of all. If not the greatest. I would say that and the rolex sub are both so classic in their designs. For me the omega wins , but it's so so close. Most watch collector's love both. I'd be happy to own either of these 2, but I just think the white hands of the omega against the black dial is just a classic and versatile look. The omega looks amazing on a variety of straps, whilst the sub looks better on it's bracelet. But that's just my opinion. Good health Bruce, great vid as always m8.
Love the watch, have mine on now. (Hesalite, of course.) You commonly see these on leather straps because they look great, You should try one on the OEM leather with it's beautiful deployant clasp.
What’s the accuracy like on these things? I love the watch but I feel like it should be doing with its main job of keeping time well. So poor accuracy doesn’t work for me
My Sapphire Sandwich keeps +2.5 whether I’m wearing it all day or not. Dial up, dial down resting. I don’t know if everyone’s experience is the same, but I couldn’t be happier with accuracy and precision. 🙏👍
IMO the most iconic watch of all time from any manufacturer (that's not a hype based status symbol). My cousin has the hesalite, to me it feels very much like a vintage watch- not my cup of tea so I'd go for the ss.. Can't say I understand why folk like distortion from the crystal, but to each their own. Cheers mate 👍🏻
No it does not. At least Omega doesn’t think so either, or they would’ve stopped making the Sapphire version long time ago. And guess what, they purposely left the space at the very outer edge of the dial for the Sapphire halo ring to fill in.
The hesalite looks amazing. Sapphire looks cheap and makes the watch look strange. The open back is sweet but not what I'm going to be looking at many times a day.
I love distortions from crystals. What a great view of the movement, very complicated looking. I just posted a review on my Oris GMT. Hope you take a view at it, thanks!
You’re absolutely correct about this model’s potential for appreciation. I can’t conceive of an update coming in at anything less than $8000.00 considering what Omega would be aiming for in an updated completely redesigned piece.
After Omega release the 3861 Speedies, I rather suspect they will release a low production steel 321 Moonwatch at an even higher price point. And before anyone points out that we have the Ed White, remember that is a pre-moon Speedmaster. It is still not the same as the twisted lug watch with the built in pusher/crown guard design that actually went to the moon. That is still to come and Omega are making us wait for it.
I have a speedy reduced from 1998, I just love the hidden logo on the hexalite TBO, it just screams OMG... My Seamaster 300 doesn't have it, which is a little disappointing, but that's sapphire crystal for you...
Great comparison, thank you, Bruce. Somehow, can't warm up to the Speedmaster. For that $$$$, I'd go for Omega's divers- the SMP300M or the 43.5mn OP. Better lume, water resistant, I've got no use for a tachymeter bezel. Great watches, just not for me. By the way, Omega is funny spelling things out, huh? "Speedmaster" "barrel one, barrel two" column wheel".
To better absorb shocks, Omega transitioned to using a Delrin brake (which is a synthetic and not "plastic") for caliber 861/1861 beginning in 1977. Speedmasters acquired by NASA as part of the 1978 Space Shuttle/EVA re-certification quite possibly included this improvement and most likely any Speedy worn in space since that time (either by the U.S., Russian, or other astronauts/cosmonauts) had the Delrin brake. All that being said, the 1863 movement in your Speedmaster looks sublime and well worth showing off +++
My first "luxury" watch is Speedy Pro 3572.50 purchased in 2004. Will only part with it upon my demise, in which it will be passed along to one of my grandsons.
Of course the crystal, or even the new co-axial Chronometer. But nothing tops the old original moon version, dispite its sweet, vintage shortcomings...
I’m time both of these will be seen as closer to the original based solely on the 1861-1863 being in them regardless of what crystal is on top. The new co axial is a great feat of engineering, but these two will be the last of their kind pretty soon
I've got the sapphire. Read a very long post on WatchUSeek about why people sold their Speedmasters. Two reasons really stood out the most - not liking the small hand winding crown and scratching the crystal. So I got the sapphire to address at least one of those issues.
I'm all for Sapphire on the Speedmaster. I wouldn't want a speedy to scratch in a comfortable office / casual settings. But wish the premium would be lesser to give the purist a tempting offer to get the sapphire model instead.
Personally, is pick the sapphire sandwich. I'm a big sapphire fan. However, I'd be happy with either. I'm of the opinion that the speed master is one of the most legible chronographs.
I find that people who love Speedmasters and arent opposed to buying several variants of it tend to go Hesalite. For the more "casual" Speedmaster fan, who would probably buy the standard pro but are unlikley to purchase any other Speedy, tend to go sapphire
Great comparison, Bruce. I've come close to buying a Speedy, but never done so. Maybe now's the time! Personally, I prefer the look of the Hesalite, but do like that exhibition case back! I think the choice is down to practicality - if you wear it as your one watch in all conditions, then go sapphire, it's better. It just saves the hassle of refinishing/replacing the Hesalite (not difficult or expensive, mind) - more peace of mind - its boring to worry about a tool watch! For an occasional/collector's watch, go Hesalite - more authentic, the enthusiast's choice and probably more valuable long term.
Will the update be a sandwich too? I swear to you that I was almost going to order the sandwich but now I'm going to wait. Please update me if you could please
I've read that the new updated watch will be available in both versions. I'm also going to wait as I love the watch but like the idea of a more accurate and hackable movement
Velcro Strap...? That is NASA P/N SEB12100030-202, well, sort of replica by OMEGA, which allows the watch to be worn OVER the space suit. BTW, Velcro was developed by Swiss engineer Georges de Mestral, and not by NASA as widely believed.
believe me, thinking about having one of these amazing boxes Omega provides makes me more likely to buy one of their watches. is it enough to make me eventually pull a trigger? we'll see, but i'm a sucker for presentation and packaging. ( sad but true. ) Sapphire all the way! gotta see that caliber
I would probably get the sapphire version if it didn't have the sapphire caseback. I absolutely hate the feeling of sticky glass on my skin, especially once you start sweating. Yuk.
brother at the minute 2:03 u are stating that the height of the zaphire sandwic it's 13.7mm and the hesalite 14.6mm . i think u got it wrong . it's the other way around . the hesalite it's more flat. i got both and i notice . u can really see it than i measure and the zaphire it's thicker.
I see the moonwatch as a vintage watch which has evolved without beging distorted in its personality. So giving it a sapphire crystal which looks cold compared to the hesalite is sad and a non sense to me. The dome and patina the hesalite gets has so much more charm to it. If I had chosen the route of modernity with sapphire, nicer movements with high accuracy and see through cadeback, I would probably have gone towards the coax speedmasters. But loosing the vintage heritage of the moonwatch with that sapphire which seems a bit off with that milky ring, almost like it was not made for it in its esthetic design is a shame for the poor moonwatch in my opinion. I don't regret my hesalite one single bit of a second, even when I take my polywatch from time to time, leaving some slight traces and scratches on it on purpose. Patina 😉
NASA specifically ignored everything but the hesalite crystal for very good reason. You all know the story. Therefore, it is the hesalite version that I own, as I think that the sapphire is a wannabe facsimile version of what is, otherwise, a piece of history.
It was my grail watch, studied it a lot, almost bought it, when the prices were real few years ago. I thought of buying sapphire version, but that milky ring is making a dial smaller and there is something in that domed hesalite that makes the dial.... Anyway, the watch aged worse than submariner, all the curves... makes it look old fashioned.
Idiots who are comparing a Rolex here don’t understand smthat omega won’t change this watch.. it’s a classic and will be original forever. I see some losers saying my Rolex has gold markers and hands hahahaha 😂🤣.
Bruce, that hesalite crystal looks like it has so much more depth than the sapphire. I can't explain in words but it just adds something to the dial.
Just picked up a Hesatlite version for $4300. This video makes me very happy.
Absolutely love the vintage look that the Haselite gives the watch.
I do prefer it on leather strap. But that is my personal preference.
If Rolex owned the Speedmaster they would have the price in the $10.000.00 plus . The Speedmaster is one of the best watches on the market.
My opinion exactly. The price would be somewhere north of the moon 😂 and Rolex lovers would love it.
It’s not as good as a Rolex. The finish on the bracelet is very low in comparison to the Rolex I have handled. Sharp corners etc.
Well Rolex does use REAL gold for markers and hands. Rolex does make the best bracelet in the business. Also they make their own metal as 904 does feel different and less corrosive. So there is a big difference. With that being said, I just bought a new Omega to go with my Rolex’s. You can like both brands! 🤷🏼♂️
@@jamestheadvisor1650 does omega use 316L steel for the new moon watch?
@@robbieyh they do use 316L stainless steel. That is correct.
Had this choice. The sapphire sandwich was the one for me. Excellent review and comparison Bruce. Thanks for sharing.
I was born in 1969 and am about to buy my first Speedmaster, has to be the Hesalite version!
So is there a model with a display case back with a hesalite crystal? Thats the one I want!
Awesome video mate.
I am only A$400 away from picking up my Sapphire Sandwich which they are holding whilst I pay it off.
Super excited for my 50th Birthday present to me.
congrats!
I just picked up the sandwich as well. I hope that you are enjoying it. Congratulations
Just got a Hesalith...love it
My first Speedmaster was the Sapphire. It was nice to see the movement thats for sure...but the more i saw Hesalite models, the more i realised that aesthetically they are superior. There is some vintage charm with having that smooth domed crystal, giving it a warm feel and unparalled beauty dial side.
I ended up selling my Sapphire Sandwich for hesalite sandwich. Best of both worlds, beauty at the front and the back. Now i couldnt be more happier
Great comparison Bruce. I have the hesalite and love it but can appreciate the sapphire sandwich as well.
Bruce; A beautiful presentation, as usual. The Speedmaster Professional Moonwatch has long been a grail watch for me. I love the authenticity of the Hesalite version however, when one is to spend this much on your grail, the Sapphire Sandwich with its exhibition case back and the 1863 movement is extremely tempting. Something to think about as I save up the funds for my own grail watch. Thank you for the "heads up" regarding the upcoming movement upgrade. I personally feel that the $6350 with its $1000 premium is about the most that I would feel comfortable spending. PS; The date of this post just happens to be my birthdate, maybe that's a secret code for me to "pull the trigger" sooner rather than later. It certainly helps my justification to "take the leap" (LOL). Best wishes from one true watch fanatic to another!
100% SS fan (and owner). Came down to durability/scratch resistance and the upgraded movement in display. I have the bracelet for summer and two croc deployant straps (one black and one gray). Looks luxurious on both. The only watch I own that has been recognized and given props (by a guy wearing a gold Yachtmaster).
Hey BW, I have to agree with you. The ability to be able to see that movement is superb in the sandwich.
Personally I love both for very different reasons, but I suppose at the end of the day, you really only need one. That sandwich is superb. Good choice..
We wait also for your review of this gem
I wish that I could own both just like buying a submariner date and no date.
Currently wearing my Speedy, Hesalite version, and couldn’t be happier with the ‚Original‘.
' ' *
Iv has my sapphire sandwhich for two years now and I only notice the smoky ring when others on RUclips point it out. You get used to it very quickly and I actually prefer the smaller height and less excessive bubble form from it. I don’t have to worry about scratches and I get to see that beautiful movement in action. The whole argument that the sapphire didn’t go to space is ridiculous because that acrylic they are buying did not go to space either. One or the other is not going to get you “closer” to the original simply because it will never be the original
Just buy what you like. I happen to enjoy looking at the exhibition case back as it is finished very nicely.
The hesalite 1861 actually did go in space. Please check your facts.
It is indeed a “legendary” timepiece! That classic look will never get old! Since I am sucker for this beauty I went with heselite version! Box is also amazing, just like an icing on the cake! 😉
I just purchased the speedmaster38, I normally prefer bigger watches but I just love this one
I did buy my Speedy Pro five years ago. I went for the Hesalite! And to be honest it was pretty clear for me as the Sapphire version was 1500€ more expensive after discounts. So I didn't really think about it any longer. But still, I'm very happy with my past decision. I love the distortion of the Hesalite crystal as well as the beautifully domed shape of it. I also prefer the writings on the closed caseback compared to the Sapphire. The outer metal ring with all the text looks to cluttered for my taste.
I think within the watch community this decision is pretty much a perfect balance =)
Great comparison Bruce, thanks! All the best from Germany, Daniel
For watches with domed or raised crystals, you should list also the case height to the top of the bezel since the crystal is so light relative to the case.
The hesalite sandwich (3592.50/345.0808) is amazing. Best of both worlds with a tritium dial
Hi Bruce just looking back at this & how right you are with the prices. I have a Sapphire Sandwich on let’s say leather deployment & I ❤ it more every time I wear the watch. One of my all time favourites. 👍
Does anyone know if the golden-colored parts of the Sapphire Sandwich's movement are real gold or just golden in color?
Just colour.
Otherways the price will be increased much more than already is,and the weight of gold will perjudicate the accuracy.
Im obsessing on Sapphire or Hesalite. Which should i pick...
The hesalite version is for the WIS romantic who fell in love with the historical connection and significance of the Speedy while the sapphire version is for the more practical watch collector to whom the Speedy is a tool watch, nothing more. Your mileage may vary.
Hey what are your thoughts on white dial or "great white" seamaster 300m? Will it drop in price, or the opposite? I'm purchasing sapphire sandwich soon but itching for an SMP white really bad but don't want to make a wrong move by purchadint too many omegas:) thanks, and BTW great video
Nice review. I’ve owned the sapphire version for years. I was on the fence, but the thinner profile and scratch resistance of the glass made it a better choice as a daily driver. One thing to add to your review might be the cost of ownership. Servicing these watches isn’t cheap. Omega currently charges $850 USD.
Im love the way the dial looks through hesalite, but to the 1863 is the sapphire which more durable and it is reasonable for daily use so for me i would buy the 1863.... if its compare with the 321, then its another topic of choice.
Hesalite looks nicer if I'm honest. It has more charm. One of the greatest watch designs of all. If not the greatest. I would say that and the rolex sub are both so classic in their designs. For me the omega wins , but it's so so close. Most watch collector's love both. I'd be happy to own either of these 2, but I just think the white hands of the omega against the black dial is just a classic and versatile look. The omega looks amazing on a variety of straps, whilst the sub looks better on it's bracelet. But that's just my opinion. Good health Bruce, great vid as always m8.
I love changing straps on my Panerai and just picked up a nato from Omega.
Love the watch, have mine on now. (Hesalite, of course.) You commonly see these on leather straps because they look great, You should try one on the OEM leather with it's beautiful deployant clasp.
Great one Bruce!!!
Hi Bruce. Great Video I have the Hesalite and for me it looks better . Greetings from germany
What’s the accuracy like on these things? I love the watch but I feel like it should be doing with its main job of keeping time well. So poor accuracy doesn’t work for me
My Sapphire Sandwich keeps +2.5 whether I’m wearing it all day or not. Dial up, dial down resting. I don’t know if everyone’s experience is the same, but I couldn’t be happier with accuracy and precision. 🙏👍
IMO the most iconic watch of all time from any manufacturer (that's not a hype based status symbol). My cousin has the hesalite, to me it feels very much like a vintage watch- not my cup of tea so I'd go for the ss.. Can't say I understand why folk like distortion from the crystal, but to each their own. Cheers mate 👍🏻
Cheers Steve
Hesalite looks much better
100% right. the sapphire looks like a classic car that has been modified.
For years I thought I was a sapphire sandwich guy. Just can’t do it. The sapphire looks too weird.
No it does not. At least Omega doesn’t think so either, or they would’ve stopped making the Sapphire version long time ago. And guess what, they purposely left the space at the very outer edge of the dial for the Sapphire halo ring to fill in.
The hesalite looks amazing. Sapphire looks cheap and makes the watch look strange. The open back is sweet but not what I'm going to be looking at many times a day.
I love distortions from crystals. What a great view of the movement, very complicated looking. I just posted a review on my Oris GMT. Hope you take a view at it, thanks!
Is it possible that the price of these versions will drop, rather than increase, when the newer better version is released?
Have you heard anything about new snoopy that should come out soon?
You’re absolutely correct about this model’s potential for appreciation. I can’t conceive of an update coming in at anything less than $8000.00 considering what Omega would be aiming for in an updated completely redesigned piece.
I'll be surprised if it is less than 8!
After Omega release the 3861 Speedies, I rather suspect they will release a low production steel 321 Moonwatch at an even higher price point.
And before anyone points out that we have the Ed White, remember that is a pre-moon Speedmaster. It is still not the same as the twisted lug watch with the built in pusher/crown guard design that actually went to the moon. That is still to come and Omega are making us wait for it.
I have a speedy reduced from 1998, I just love the hidden logo on the hexalite TBO, it just screams OMG... My Seamaster 300 doesn't have it, which is a little disappointing, but that's sapphire crystal for you...
They really need to return the variant with hesalite front and sapphire caseback. Not sure why they do not have that option anymore.
Sapphire for me, please! I feel like I eoulf be polishing the Hesalite every time I wore it.
Great comparison, thank you, Bruce. Somehow, can't warm up to the Speedmaster. For that $$$$, I'd go for Omega's divers- the SMP300M or the 43.5mn OP. Better lume, water resistant, I've got no use for a tachymeter bezel. Great watches, just not for me. By the way, Omega is funny spelling things out, huh? "Speedmaster" "barrel one, barrel two" column wheel".
To better absorb shocks, Omega transitioned to using a Delrin brake (which is a synthetic and not "plastic") for caliber 861/1861 beginning in 1977. Speedmasters acquired by NASA as part of the 1978 Space Shuttle/EVA re-certification quite possibly included this improvement and most likely any Speedy worn in space since that time (either by the U.S., Russian, or other astronauts/cosmonauts) had the Delrin brake. All that being said, the 1863 movement in your Speedmaster looks sublime and well worth showing off +++
As you know Bruce from email I want that sapphire sandwich love seeing the movement
My first "luxury" watch is Speedy Pro 3572.50 purchased in 2004. Will only part with it upon my demise, in which it will be passed along to one of my grandsons.
Of course the crystal, or even the new co-axial Chronometer. But nothing tops the old original moon version, dispite its sweet, vintage shortcomings...
I’m time both of these will be seen as closer to the original based solely on the 1861-1863 being in them regardless of what crystal is on top. The new co axial is a great feat of engineering, but these two will be the last of their kind pretty soon
Is it just me, or is there not concentric circles in the sub dials?
I've got the sapphire. Read a very long post on WatchUSeek about why people sold their Speedmasters. Two reasons really stood out the most - not liking the small hand winding crown and scratching the crystal. So I got the sapphire to address at least one of those issues.
I like the hessalite better but I'd scratch it in no time... A double dilemma!
Didn't you do a very similar video on both these Speedmasters on July 1st?
I did an unboxing on the two last month, then a review of the hesalite, now this comparison. Eventually I'll do a review on the ss
@@BruceWilliams Very good. Can't get enough of the Speedmaster.
I'm all for Sapphire on the Speedmaster. I wouldn't want a speedy to scratch in a comfortable office / casual settings. But wish the premium would be lesser to give the purist a tempting offer to get the sapphire model instead.
EmceeChoo; I emphatically agree!
I always bang my watch while desk diving. I am also too ocd to have scratches.
Personally, is pick the sapphire sandwich. I'm a big sapphire fan. However, I'd be happy with either. I'm of the opinion that the speed master is one of the most legible chronographs.
I'm not paying 4 grand and getting a plastic face
You’ve missed the point then!
I took you're advice and called Nick at Equisite Watch. What a great guy! Great store! Keep them coming.....
He is awesome for sure
I find that people who love Speedmasters and arent opposed to buying several variants of it tend to go Hesalite.
For the more "casual" Speedmaster fan, who would probably buy the standard pro but are unlikley to purchase any other Speedy, tend to go sapphire
Great comparison, Bruce. I've come close to buying a Speedy, but never done so. Maybe now's the time! Personally, I prefer the look of the Hesalite, but do like that exhibition case back! I think the choice is down to practicality - if you wear it as your one watch in all conditions, then go sapphire, it's better. It just saves the hassle of refinishing/replacing the Hesalite (not difficult or expensive, mind) - more peace of mind - its boring to worry about a tool watch! For an occasional/collector's watch, go Hesalite - more authentic, the enthusiast's choice and probably more valuable long term.
Will the update be a sandwich too? I swear to you that I was almost going to order the sandwich but now I'm going to wait. Please update me if you could please
I've read that the new updated watch will be available in both versions. I'm also going to wait as I love the watch but like the idea of a more accurate and hackable movement
@@MW_1981 too late, already got it just before it was discontinued and it's gone up already. Now I can save for the new one. Thank you for replying
If this speedy was more water resistant had an adjustable clasp and tapered bracelet it would be the only watch I’d ever need.
Love the Piaget, however the old design is so much more original.
Velcro Strap...? That is NASA P/N SEB12100030-202, well, sort of replica by OMEGA, which allows the watch to be worn OVER the space suit. BTW, Velcro was developed by Swiss engineer Georges de Mestral, and not by NASA as widely believed.
Weight difference ?
believe me, thinking about having one of these amazing boxes Omega provides makes me more likely to buy one of their watches. is it enough to make me eventually pull a trigger? we'll see, but i'm a sucker for presentation and packaging. ( sad but true. ) Sapphire all the way! gotta see that caliber
I get that, the box is pretty ridiculous but at the same time such a draw!
I'm not an astronaut, I'm never going to the Moon. I'm man on the Earth so sapphire sandwich is for me.
Hesalite for me .
I was told that sapphire are less producer and a bit harder to get.
I would probably get the sapphire version if it didn't have the sapphire caseback. I absolutely hate the feeling of sticky glass on my skin, especially once you start sweating. Yuk.
Sapphire everyday of the week.👍🇦🇺
Hesalite. If you go speedy go the limit)
brother at the minute 2:03 u are stating that the height of the zaphire sandwic it's 13.7mm and the hesalite 14.6mm . i think u got it wrong . it's the other way around . the hesalite it's more flat. i got both and i notice . u can really see it than i measure and the zaphire it's thicker.
I see the moonwatch as a vintage watch which has evolved without beging distorted in its personality. So giving it a sapphire crystal which looks cold compared to the hesalite is sad and a non sense to me. The dome and patina the hesalite gets has so much more charm to it.
If I had chosen the route of modernity with sapphire, nicer movements with high accuracy and see through cadeback, I would probably have gone towards the coax speedmasters.
But loosing the vintage heritage of the moonwatch with that sapphire which seems a bit off with that milky ring, almost like it was not made for it in its esthetic design is a shame for the poor moonwatch in my opinion.
I don't regret my hesalite one single bit of a second, even when I take my polywatch from time to time, leaving some slight traces and scratches on it on purpose. Patina 😉
How many times can one man do a video on the Speedmaster Pro haha
That sounds like a challenge!
First! Go sapphire, the hesalite is just asking for a pounding
Congrats man
NASA specifically ignored everything but the hesalite crystal for very good reason. You all know the story. Therefore, it is the hesalite version that I own, as I think that the sapphire is a wannabe facsimile version of what is, otherwise, a piece of history.
The benefit for astronouts use hesalite is it do not scatter when it breaks
SS 😍
Dial on the sapphire looks like a cheap knock off compared to the hesalite version.
Er is maar 1 de echte...🌝
Easy. to go on vacation to the moon 1861 (heselite) and to live on planet earth 1863 (sapphire sandwich).
Diego M; That's a great way to look at the two models in comparison.
It was my grail watch, studied it a lot, almost bought it, when the prices were real few years ago. I thought of buying sapphire version, but that milky ring is making a dial smaller and there is something in that domed hesalite that makes the dial....
Anyway, the watch aged worse than submariner, all the curves... makes it look old fashioned.
The sun is very timeless. But the omega looks amazing for a 50+ year old design. It’s not really very dated when you have it and use it.
Idiots who are comparing a Rolex here don’t understand smthat omega won’t change this watch.. it’s a classic and will be original forever. I see some losers saying my Rolex has gold markers and hands hahahaha 😂🤣.