Recording at the right level is important when trying to get a professional sound. In this video, We will look at: 1) Avoiding background noise 2) Getting a full and balanced tone 3) Inspiring confidence in your recording
I would take an educated guess and say the reason the 2 recordings sound slightly different is due to the position of the mics rather than what volume you recorded at. Even though they are very close together, just a small difference in relation of the mics to the instrument can cause a noticeable difference in sound. Micing is a science in itself.
Amazing demonstration!! Excellent work Michael!! This was extremely helpful to all of us, no matter what your level of experience!! Marvellous work!! The Lewitt is a near zero noise microphone, amazing value for money!
I've never considered that there may be a difference psychologically between looking at a weak signal versus a strong one. That was an interesting and unexpected observation. Kudos.
7:26 I like the quiet one with post-gain added. The tone just seems more clear, feels like there's more dynamics as well. I'm on an alienware headset though so take my observation with a grain of salt.
Lots of respect for allowing yourself to say what you really saw here instead of trying to find a difference that wasn’t there. I was expecting the same thing and I actually reversed back thinking somehow there was a mistake but nope...you got it!
Definitely one of my bigger insecurities about creating music. Thank you so much for the time and effort put into the making of this video, In The Mix, i truly appreciate it!
You're definitely amazing. Thanks! I notice my vocal recordings have the thinner line signal and I've been quite worried about that. I discussed it with a pal today, and your video divinely comes in and addresses the issue. My confidence is up now man. You are amazing!!!!
8:30 This is a good point. So when I recorded with a guitarist, i actually put on a Master Bus Comp, followed by some basic Mid Side processing. It made the backing track sound louder and fuller, where as without those effects the track sounded a bit raw and a bit lifeless. Of course when the recording is done I will strip all that stuff out and begin from scratch to get a fresh mix.
Yeah. When it comes to quality gear the converters are pretty clear and noise and hiss is typically much lower. But when you use cheaper equipment the converters tend to get a bit crunchy when hit harder and tend to get brittle and crackly at low volumes. I teach my students -12dB is pretty healthy and even on cheaper equipment it’s pretty clear and artifact free. I link them your videos as well since the explanations are nice and clear. :)
I just want to say thanks for all of the things you do for us. I have been producing for a bit more than a year, and often face problems that I cant resolve myself, the first place i go is your channel. thank you for always delivering great videos!
You know what.. you are the one of best RUclipsr. You deserve million subscriber and will be. Your every topic about mixing is very informative. I appreciate it. God bless you..
I just got done recording myself for the first time on vibraphone, and I hate to admit it, but I am definitely in the 'low low levels' camp. I had to boost the gain in logic so much to get it to sound. Luckily, I had access to some really nice equipment through my university, so I didn't have noise issues. Still, I definitely need to practice more.
I enjoyed the video. Regarding the concept of confidence, it helps me to record my flute with a little less gain, because I have confidence to play out in the upper register without clipping. When playing the flute any type of tension can cause, especially, tone problems. So not worrying about clipping helps improve the performance. Yes, I do complete a sound check in the various registers, but playing “live” seems to always be a bit louder. Regarding the size of the waveform, I simply would raise it before a customer sees it. I would do this anyway before I listen.
4 года назад+2
This video is really interesting and helpful. People are saying mic placement but I think what’s causing the difference is interface’s internal physical preamp gain. They are indeed analog, so I think they affect non-linear so that’s exactly why they sound different when volumes are digitally matched. However, this comes down to this question. Which is better? I can’t really judge which is better. I felt both has different advantages. What do you think about this point?
Gotta say this video has definitely taken away my fear and worries of recording a little too quiet or too loud... as long as the signals are not clipping, I can always increase or decrease the volume in my DAW. The tone quality demonstrated in this video is noticeable, but it's not as significant to the point we should spend our time debating which is better. Great video!
Other factors come to play as well such as the preamp/interface you’re using, the type of mic, and the mic placement. If you have a cheap preamp/interface, they tend to be noisier due to its electrical components.
@@namede6210 I’d say so. Personally you gotta experiment and see what works with you whether you like to be conservative with levels or really like to push them. Noise floor isn’t a big deal now compared to the 50s to the 80s with the analog gear. But, just be considerate on not to introduce any unwanted noise or clip/distort upon recording.
Very nice video, I like the recording and I normally record at (around) -12dB/-6dB-peaks (at 16bit/48Khz) or -18dB/-12dB-peaks (at 96Khz 24bit) obtaining a nice dynamic and well defined sound than lower values of recording levels...You say right, the noise is something to decrease as much as possible before to record something and...after, using a noise gate to automatically cut-off the intervals between a word or phrase to another...
Excellent 🙌🙌🙌 and thank you so much. I was confused about the -18 suggested level for recording. My electric guitars sounds superb peaking at -3. Now I’m recording my amps again with shure 57, 58, beta 58, royer 121, akg 414 and so. Neve 1073lb preamps, apogee symphony mkII as the converter. Noise was never an issue. But the richest juicy full magic tones of electric guitars I found them at levels of -3. So thank you again👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻
When recording with true analog equipment, input volume is incredibly important. Hitting your pre amps, EQ and compressors with the right amount of gain is paramount. Although, there is room for interpretation in terms of saturation and colour. The open rule of an RMS of -18DBFS is a good starting point for a recommend gain structure. Although this is open for interpretation, depending on the musical role of an instrument and the saturation required for the genre. Most analog equipment manuals will tell you to hit the equipment with a particular amount of gain in order to achieve optimal sound colouration. Usually around the RMS of -18DBFS.
Audio engineering is extremely difficult for me to figure out and do with trumpet and make it sound well. Watching your videos honestly makes it feel less overwhelming and makes working with FL Studio feel more relaxed.
Bro,u just helped me understand the difference between rms and peak value. Been recording vocals at minus18dbfs,now i no why I never got the desired tone and feel. Gain staging is useless when a beginner doesn't understand the different types of meter and how to read them. Thanks alot again. Taylor magic from Nigeria that's in Africa
So one thing that I do with my mic is run low gain to avoid using a noise gate. This is super use specific during streaming. I have not found at all that running almost literally zero gain on my interface umc204hd, gives me extra noise when compressing and adding makeup gain. I also basically need to have my lips against the mic to get the signal I need but I don't have any issues mixing or needing to eq or denoise anything. Mic-interface-compressor-reverb is all the chain is for vocal during streaming. I actually boost highs in the channel mix and cut mids because I find I have a "nasal" sounding voice naturally and cutting mids and adding highs seems to remove that slightly stuffed nose sound I have naturally.
I’ve been searching the internet for this for a long time. Thank you. I record synths and they cover a huge frequency span so you have to record so low and then increase gain. I always think it’s distorting the recording but then im not sure. I think my eyes are playing tricks on my ears.
I like the low input gain. Because I feel the more dynamic on it. And very much clear. Other hand you have more head room to tweak and make the sound more better. Because in audio recording head room is very important. I strongly believe. -18 LUFS input gain always good to start. And very good video. Nice explain.
If an artist that had a vocal with a very dynamic range were going over one of the two recordings I'd choose the top one because there is less "distraction" on that recording as opposed to the second recording where I heard a lot of little details that would sound nice accompanied by a vocal with little dynamic range or a track where the vocal is not the main focus. Idk if that makes sense but that's how I perceive what's going on. Thanks for the tutorial and tips!
I think this whole "introducing noise when gain staging a low signal" is mainly focused on pushing the signal after compression. That could be why you did not experience the effect you expected with the low signal. Isn't that the most crucial step in your effect chain regarding noise? Have you tried compressing it before you add the gain? love you videos, helped me a lot :)
Love your videos man! They are so informative and interesting. Would have loved to see Pro-Q EQ match function comparing both signals, cause I could hear a difference in the top end.
Hi! Thanks for this experiment. After a year++ this information may be not so actual, but anyway: 6:26 To find out where is a specific tonal difference between two tracks I think you should make one of tracks phase inverted. If they are quite similar then you can hear absolute silence. But If they are not -- you will hear that difference in specific frequency range.
I agree with you that the first recording seems more stable, not as harsh on the top end. But the second recording after equalizing it, it might just be a matter of how you'll use the sound. For example the first recording sounded more full, I would prefer to put this sample on top of the track where it would stand out the most vs. the second one I feel like has enough space for my vocals to sit on.
Awesome work man - I for one did hear a difference in the tone of the guitar between hi and lo. Hi felt as you said a bit more rich in that it had a very subtle natural reverb. While the lo actually had a lo in where I experienced a sound with a slight bit of bass between each strum.
The difference is surprisingly small! Looks like it's completely safe to record much quieter in many cases. Targeting averages somewhere between -24 dBFS and -18 dBFS depending on the noise floor of your preamp. -18 dBFS is a good RMS average if you use plug-ins emulating analog gear.
Very good demonstration. I am hearing a bit more treble tone from the second recording. But warmer to me is what I prefer in most cases. If you have a video on maximizing output during playback please send a link. I can never get a strong output on a home recording on my receiver end as when I pop in a professional CD. Seems like my volume knob has to increase about 1/3 more. Thanks for the tips I will check out for your Vid's.
I'm actually surprised how close these track sound. I was sure that the quiet one would have more noise even when using a decent mic. However, audient has a great preamp so this might have something to do with that as well. Awesome video man, nice work
well the mics were not in the EXACT same position so that might be why you think the first one sounds more stable @ 6:50. I feel like the inch or 2 can really make that difference
You're right that the inch or two would make a difference in the tone,no doubt. But it's as close as I can get and it certainly proves a good point about the noise floor or even very affordable microphones :)
God has a lot of work these days, so he decided to put you on RUclips so he doesn't have to be taking care of us, the forgotten person behind the sucess of the singers: producers. Thanks for the content!
I think, in digital world there's no difference in between wether you record at -36db rms or -8db, because when you lower your gain to leave headroom for loud sounds you lowering the noise too, so it doesn't change at all when you boost gain back. And about tone change, see, your mics were pretty close to each other, but not in the same spot *and* as you know all mics of the same model doesn't have perfectly the same frequency response. I think this is exactly what caused tone change. btw, I am sorry if I have some errors in my message that's because I'm russian. P.S. Great work! Thank you very much for your vids, you lead me to the world of music creation!
I think the tonal difference in the two guitars might just be the 2 inch difference in mic placement. What are your thoughts on using the normalising feature to make everything the same level? Will it help to make sure the mix plugins are hit at the right level? I was always cautious of doing it because of the potential to introduce noise, but it seems that concern was misplaced in light of what you've just shown.
If the levels from the two mics to the audio interface are the same, I don't think it matters whether you gain it up with the preamp or gain it up digitally as long as the preamp isn't below unity gain. In both cases you have the same SNR going into the preamp and you are applying the same gain (albeit digitally in one case, and analog preamp in the other). If you set the preamp to less than unity gain, then I would expect to hear more noise when you gain it up because you impacted the SNR. I think the difference in tone is simply the color of the preamp vs the perfect flatness of digital gain.
As learner with a capital bloody "L" this has been the stuff of my nightmares. Should I, shouldn't I, -18,-14.......Its been driving me doolally. Thanks for the very concise and understandable explanation.
The second guitar seemed to have a fuller sound. The 1st one is a bit brighter, but less full. It totally depends on the mix of the song because both sounds are great.
I enjoyed this video it was very well done. I also like a healthy level when recording, the only thing to be mindful of is gain staging while mixing, otherwise all those hot signals will kill your mix buss RIP. Also some plug-ins sound better when not fed an overly hot signal, you know, that mystical sweet spot 🤓
Definitely hear a difference. The top one sounds full, where as the bottom sounds a little bit reverberized, as well as the top end feels a bit eqed out.
I liked the first one more than the quiter one. The first one sounds a bit more fuller and has a bit more low end to it. While the quiter one sound’s a bit flat and cold. I prefer the first one that has more warmth to it. But it depends on wich context the guitar is gonna be in. If it’s an acoustic session/song or if it’s more of a background ambience for edm and so on. I usually like to record a few dbs under -1 db. Around -5 to -6 db. Just to have some gain so I don’t have to spend to much time trying to boost the sound without clipping or compressing too much.
Its sounds like the freq between 100 - 400 are more pronounced on the high volume top recording. If the low recording is Eq'ED to lift the lows, I believe the difference will be irrelevant. Especially if this will be mixed along 10-30 other tracks. The real lesson here IMO, is the guitar (very rich, bright and warm tone) and the playing (clean with no heavy string buzzing from heavy hitting).
Definitely hear a cleaner sound in the higher gain setting version. I feel the lower gain setting with amplified gain later has almost like a higher resonance/reverb sound -- which could just be the subtle enhancement of the noise that is also amplified (could be all in my head, but just my thoughts).
Whats interesting is I have the 3000$ Neumann U 87 , and its te exact opposite of what. you said and what was shown 🤔 Makes me very curious , cause when I record low and turn it up as you did the static or room noise is much louder tan if I recorded at a higher level. So with expensive top of the line equipment it is for me te exact opposite of what was shown here & more along the lines of what you said you expected at first. Very Odd Indeed.
Perhaps maybe "background noise" is audio interference caused by components used in cheaper microphones and amplifiers where small discrepancies multiply ...example is a cheap HiFi amp jack up the volume when with input is unconnected and hear the noise......Look up (or visit the PYE museum Cambridge) there is a 6 track mixing console with the lid off inside is mostly air!! ...then listern to Led Zepplin recordings made at Headley Grange....this was advanced cutting edge for late 1960s....equipment was the very best...also worth a listern is "Tell Star" released as a ground breaking 45 single. early 60s then with idle curiosity lookup method of how that was recorded. Im from the period of Phillips compact cassett......nothing is new its just re learnt...
Bro! Thanks for this important information. 1. We also need a tutorial on How to mix Vocals of Two singers or more. (DT s) and Choir 2. Surround mixing. Please make videos on these two if you really think they are useful. THANK YOU
whenever i'd watched your tutorial it's inspire me so much thanks for hardwork for this all your vdo guide me to make my own in my language for best way for peoples in my country wish your healty good everyday and god bless you my great teacher on youtube
Hi Mike and thanks for wonderful tutorials😍, may you make a tutorial or explain about difference between pick , rms , db and UV !? Please it's so important for me Thanks
I always use SPAN so that I can make sure there is a similar level of base frequencies, mid-range and high frequencies. Maybe that is cheating, but I know that if I can get great results with that, my music will sound good. I always aim for a mix of 0db too.
Its hard for me to hear a difference no matter how hard I tried...they both sound the same to me. Great vid as always! Thanx for sharing. Greetings from California
Recording at -18 dB means you're using only 13 of the available 16 bits, even if you're at 24 bit internal. So instead of that nice 96 dB dynamic range, you're now recording with 78 dB dynamic range. Very few people understand that analogue is NOT digital. Bill P.
@@BenDover84932 As close to 0 dBFS as possible without going 'over'. Just like analogue. I don't 'buy into' this -18 dB nonsense, as you can see. Bill P.
Recording at the right level is important when trying to get a professional sound. In this video, We will look at:
1) Avoiding background noise
2) Getting a full and balanced tone
3) Inspiring confidence in your recording
Thanks for the best videos
Yea yea I can hear it. Yea it is interesting.... (me listening on 20 dollar headphones) awsome video!
I was hearing the room more in the lower one
Awesome!!
I would take an educated guess and say the reason the 2 recordings sound slightly different is due to the position of the mics rather than what volume you recorded at. Even though they are very close together, just a small difference in relation of the mics to the instrument can cause a noticeable difference in sound. Micing is a science in itself.
Amazing demonstration!! Excellent work Michael!! This was extremely helpful to all of us, no matter what your level of experience!! Marvellous work!! The Lewitt is a near zero noise microphone, amazing value for money!
Great thing seeing my 2 favourite channels admire and help each other. You guys rock!
Cool to see you here!
🙄
Am going to be a Marvellous Producer
I’m really curious about Lewitts marketing budget for RUclips 😂
To be honest every time I watch a video of yours I feel so much better about myself, i dont know why.
RUclips is addiction
To me it sounds like you're saying he's lesser than you which makes you feel better :|
@@50MBIE not my fault you take things the wrong way 🙃
No need to get heated buddy
Me too
I've never considered that there may be a difference psychologically between looking at a weak signal versus a strong one. That was an interesting and unexpected observation. Kudos.
Respect for being confident in showcasing your biases and testing them.
dude out here making experiments i’m wayyy too lazy for, just comin for the results. great job man, thanks
You are too much my boss, the top level sounds more clearer than the low level thanks for this video, pastor emma from Ghana.
i been struggling with trying to decide how hot to set my pre for years. thanks for this. much needed. subbed
7:26 I like the quiet one with post-gain added. The tone just seems more clear, feels like there's more dynamics as well.
I'm on an alienware headset though so take my observation with a grain of salt.
Lots of respect for allowing yourself to say what you really saw here instead of trying to find a difference that wasn’t there. I was expecting the same thing and I actually reversed back thinking somehow there was a mistake but nope...you got it!
Definitely one of my bigger insecurities about creating music.
Thank you so much for the time and effort put into the making of this video, In The Mix, i truly appreciate it!
You're definitely amazing. Thanks!
I notice my vocal recordings have the thinner line signal and I've been quite worried about that. I discussed it with a pal today, and your video divinely comes in and addresses the issue. My confidence is up now man.
You are amazing!!!!
8:30 This is a good point. So when I recorded with a guitarist, i actually put on a Master Bus Comp, followed by some basic Mid Side processing. It made the backing track sound louder and fuller, where as without those effects the track sounded a bit raw and a bit lifeless.
Of course when the recording is done I will strip all that stuff out and begin from scratch to get a fresh mix.
Yeah. When it comes to quality gear the converters are pretty clear and noise and hiss is typically much lower. But when you use cheaper equipment the converters tend to get a bit crunchy when hit harder and tend to get brittle and crackly at low volumes.
I teach my students -12dB is pretty healthy and even on cheaper equipment it’s pretty clear and artifact free. I link them your videos as well since the explanations are nice and clear. :)
I just want to say thanks for all of the things you do for us. I have been producing for a bit more than a year, and often face problems that I cant resolve myself, the first place i go is your channel. thank you for always delivering great videos!
Finally someone bold enough to prove this point. Thank you!
The difference in tone between the two recordings could come down to the slightly different placement of the mics as opposed to the input gain
Yes, 100% as loudness correction has no way of "colouring" a sound.
Definitely. No two mics sound the same either.
This test requires a parallel cable into two pres so that you are comparing the same capsule.
08:55 the second microphone which records in low voice is sounding like more bass boosted than other
I was searching this topic today....and you put this on ur channel....loved the advice 🤟
In my opinion, your passion for music makes you the best. I watch everything you release. This is just a plus to it. Big up.
i just found out about you like 30 min ago and i am so happy i did
You know what.. you are the one of best RUclipsr. You deserve million subscriber and will be. Your every topic about mixing is very informative. I appreciate it. God bless you..
I just got done recording myself for the first time on vibraphone, and I hate to admit it, but I am definitely in the 'low low levels' camp. I had to boost the gain in logic so much to get it to sound. Luckily, I had access to some really nice equipment through my university, so I didn't have noise issues. Still, I definitely need to practice more.
Just what I needed! Thanks! By the way, it is possible that microphones are not 100% identical, that is what they sound a little bit different
I enjoyed the video. Regarding the concept of confidence, it helps me to record my flute with a little less gain, because I have confidence to play out in the upper register without clipping. When playing the flute any type of tension can cause, especially, tone problems. So not worrying about clipping helps improve the performance. Yes, I do complete a sound check in the various registers, but playing “live” seems to always be a bit louder. Regarding the size of the waveform, I simply would raise it before a customer sees it. I would do this anyway before I listen.
This video is really interesting and helpful. People are saying mic placement but I think what’s causing the difference is interface’s internal physical preamp gain. They are indeed analog, so I think they affect non-linear so that’s exactly why they sound different when volumes are digitally matched.
However, this comes down to this question. Which is better? I can’t really judge which is better. I felt both has different advantages.
What do you think about this point?
Gotta say this video has definitely taken away my fear and worries of recording a little too quiet or too loud... as long as the signals are not clipping, I can always increase or decrease the volume in my DAW. The tone quality demonstrated in this video is noticeable, but it's not as significant to the point we should spend our time debating which is better. Great video!
Other factors come to play as well such as the preamp/interface you’re using, the type of mic, and the mic placement. If you have a cheap preamp/interface, they tend to be noisier due to its electrical components.
@@tylerdengler6960 I'm using Scarlett 2i2 and AT2020, I guess that's good enough at least for entry level wise?
@@namede6210 I’d say so. Personally you gotta experiment and see what works with you whether you like to be conservative with levels or really like to push them. Noise floor isn’t a big deal now compared to the 50s to the 80s with the analog gear. But, just be considerate on not to introduce any unwanted noise or clip/distort upon recording.
Very nice video, I like the recording and
I normally record at (around) -12dB/-6dB-peaks (at 16bit/48Khz) or -18dB/-12dB-peaks (at 96Khz 24bit) obtaining a nice dynamic and well defined sound than lower values of recording levels...You say right, the noise is something to decrease as much as possible before to record something and...after, using a noise gate to automatically cut-off the intervals between a word or phrase to another...
Excellent 🙌🙌🙌 and thank you so much. I was confused about the -18 suggested level for recording. My electric guitars sounds superb peaking at -3. Now I’m recording my amps again with shure 57, 58, beta 58, royer 121, akg 414 and so. Neve 1073lb preamps, apogee symphony mkII as the converter. Noise was never an issue. But the richest juicy full magic tones of electric guitars I found them at levels of -3. So thank you again👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻
When recording with true analog equipment, input volume is incredibly important. Hitting your pre amps, EQ and compressors with the right amount of gain is paramount. Although, there is room for interpretation in terms of saturation and colour.
The open rule of an RMS of -18DBFS is a good starting point for a recommend gain structure. Although this is open for interpretation, depending on the musical role of an instrument and the saturation required for the genre.
Most analog equipment manuals will tell you to hit the equipment with a particular amount of gain in order to achieve optimal sound colouration. Usually around the RMS of -18DBFS.
Audio engineering is extremely difficult for me to figure out and do with trumpet and make it sound well.
Watching your videos honestly makes it feel less overwhelming and makes working with FL Studio feel more relaxed.
You're my best teacher in beat making. You have helped me so much that I can't thank you enough.
Bro,u just helped me understand the difference between rms and peak value. Been recording vocals at minus18dbfs,now i no why I never got the desired tone and feel. Gain staging is useless when a beginner doesn't understand the different types of meter and how to read them. Thanks alot again. Taylor magic from Nigeria that's in Africa
i hear a frequency in the quiet guitar part's tone. Maybe the room's resonating frequency is louder when you boost it that much?
You are such a great pro! Only surpassed by your human quality as a person. Thanks so much mate!
So one thing that I do with my mic is run low gain to avoid using a noise gate. This is super use specific during streaming.
I have not found at all that running almost literally zero gain on my interface umc204hd, gives me extra noise when compressing and adding makeup gain. I also basically need to have my lips against the mic to get the signal I need but I don't have any issues mixing or needing to eq or denoise anything. Mic-interface-compressor-reverb is all the chain is for vocal during streaming. I actually boost highs in the channel mix and cut mids because I find I have a "nasal" sounding voice naturally and cutting mids and adding highs seems to remove that slightly stuffed nose sound I have naturally.
You are a fountain of great information. I’m a bedroom producer, and I would be much worse at it without your videos. Thank you so much!
I’ve been searching the internet for this for a long time. Thank you. I record synths and they cover a huge frequency span so you have to record so low and then increase gain. I always think it’s distorting the recording but then im not sure. I think my eyes are playing tricks on my ears.
Fantastic analysis and very insightful comment on instilling confidence by recording with a robust level of gain!
Thanks for this! Finally someone did a reasonably scientific comparison of this issue (i.e., without obvious confounds). Well done!
Gosh, did I need this. Recording opera singers with an H4, and confidence was lagging today..... thank you sooooo much!
Whenever i watch your videos i feel inspired,thnx bro.
I like the low input gain. Because I feel the more dynamic on it. And very much clear. Other hand you have more head room to tweak and make the sound more better. Because in audio recording head room is very important. I strongly believe. -18 LUFS input gain always good to start. And very good video. Nice explain.
To me you have really taught me a lot with your videos and I wouldn't be where I am today... God bless you
If an artist that had a vocal with a very dynamic range were going over one of the two recordings I'd choose the top one because there is less "distraction" on that recording as opposed to the second recording where I heard a lot of little details that would sound nice accompanied by a vocal with little dynamic range or a track where the vocal is not the main focus. Idk if that makes sense but that's how I perceive what's going on. Thanks for the tutorial and tips!
I think this whole "introducing noise when gain staging a low signal" is mainly focused on pushing the signal after compression. That could be why you did not experience the effect you expected with the low signal. Isn't that the most crucial step in your effect chain regarding noise? Have you tried compressing it before you add the gain?
love you videos, helped me a lot :)
Love your videos man! They are so informative and interesting. Would have loved to see Pro-Q EQ match function comparing both signals, cause I could hear a difference in the top end.
I really like your videos, your experiments, sweet accent and your calmness
Hi! Thanks for this experiment.
After a year++ this information may be not so actual, but anyway:
6:26 To find out where is a specific tonal difference between two tracks I think you should make one of tracks phase inverted. If they are quite similar then you can hear absolute silence. But If they are not -- you will hear that difference in specific frequency range.
Hey Michael! I like how you speak in a calm and relaxing way
I agree with you that the first recording seems more stable, not as harsh on the top end. But the second recording after equalizing it, it might just be a matter of how you'll use the sound. For example the first recording sounded more full, I would prefer to put this sample on top of the track where it would stand out the most vs. the second one I feel like has enough space for my vocals to sit on.
Awesome work man - I for one did hear a difference in the tone of the guitar between hi and lo. Hi felt as you said a bit more rich in that it had a very subtle natural reverb. While the lo actually had a lo in where I experienced a sound with a slight bit of bass between each strum.
The difference is surprisingly small! Looks like it's completely safe to record much quieter in many cases. Targeting averages somewhere between -24 dBFS and -18 dBFS depending on the noise floor of your preamp. -18 dBFS is a good RMS average if you use plug-ins emulating analog gear.
Very good demonstration. I am hearing a bit more treble tone from the second recording. But warmer to me is what I prefer in most cases. If you have a video on maximizing output during playback please send a link. I can never get a strong output on a home recording on my receiver end as when I pop in a professional CD. Seems like my volume knob has to increase about 1/3 more. Thanks for the tips I will check out for your Vid's.
I'm actually surprised how close these track sound. I was sure that the quiet one would have more noise even when using a decent mic. However, audient has a great preamp so this might have something to do with that as well. Awesome video man, nice work
Thanks! Yeah I surprised myself and wasn't expecting it to match the noise identically...
Nice Job Brother
well the mics were not in the EXACT same position so that might be why you think the first one sounds more stable @ 6:50. I feel like the inch or 2 can really make that difference
You're right that the inch or two would make a difference in the tone,no doubt. But it's as close as I can get and it certainly proves a good point about the noise floor or even very affordable microphones :)
@@inthemix you're 100% right! I was very surprised by the results you got as well! Very nice video and great experimenting as always man.
You keep on dropping gems buddy. Amazing work... thank u so much!!
I love your videos man! Great in-depth video about something that can be easily overlooked.
Really useful, thanks - explained exactly what i was looking for.
Love your videos, so helpful, thank you so much for taking the time to put all this together.
God has a lot of work these days, so he decided to put you on RUclips so he doesn't have to be taking care of us, the forgotten person behind the sucess of the singers: producers.
Thanks for the content!
I think, in digital world there's no difference in between wether you record at -36db rms or -8db, because when you lower your gain to leave headroom for loud sounds you lowering the noise too, so it doesn't change at all when you boost gain back. And about tone change, see, your mics were pretty close to each other, but not in the same spot *and* as you know all mics of the same model doesn't have perfectly the same frequency response. I think this is exactly what caused tone change.
btw, I am sorry if I have some errors in my message that's because I'm russian.
P.S. Great work! Thank you very much for your vids, you lead me to the world of music creation!
I think you're spot on. Honestly the difference in sound could very very likely be caused by a few inches in position and the microphone tolerances :)
Great video, I was surprised my the results! I also figured there would be some extra noise. Thanks for doing this!
I think the tonal difference in the two guitars might just be the 2 inch difference in mic placement. What are your thoughts on using the normalising feature to make everything the same level? Will it help to make sure the mix plugins are hit at the right level? I was always cautious of doing it because of the potential to introduce noise, but it seems that concern was misplaced in light of what you've just shown.
Excellent video. Experienced advice and delightfully clear - Subscribed!
Thank you a lot for your videos. You are helping me a lot with recording. I always try to improve myself =)
If the levels from the two mics to the audio interface are the same, I don't think it matters whether you gain it up with the preamp or gain it up digitally as long as the preamp isn't below unity gain. In both cases you have the same SNR going into the preamp and you are applying the same gain (albeit digitally in one case, and analog preamp in the other). If you set the preamp to less than unity gain, then I would expect to hear more noise when you gain it up because you impacted the SNR.
I think the difference in tone is simply the color of the preamp vs the perfect flatness of digital gain.
As learner with a capital bloody "L" this has been the stuff of my nightmares. Should I, shouldn't I, -18,-14.......Its been driving me doolally. Thanks for the very concise and understandable explanation.
super sound and marvelous explanation
The second guitar seemed to have a fuller sound. The 1st one is a bit brighter, but less full. It totally depends on the mix of the song because both sounds are great.
Yeah, second one is "warmer".
I felt the same
@@JCrashB Agreed. Like it's ever so gingerly compressed because of it's loudness?
Same here!
feels like the low ends a lot more muddier and the mids don't peak through until they are really loud
The work you are doing is amazing.... Keep killing it ❤️.... I wish you to become more famous 💕
U r god mannnnnn!!!!.i was jus searching this topic today and here i got my answerssssssssss like dammmmm
Love u mannn❤❤❤❤❤
thank you so much. your knowledge and hard work is appreciated big time
Super interesting thank you for sharing sir
I enjoyed this video it was very well done. I also like a healthy level when recording, the only thing to be mindful of is gain staging while mixing, otherwise all those hot signals will kill your mix buss RIP. Also some plug-ins sound better when not fed an overly hot signal, you know, that mystical sweet spot 🤓
Loved your experiments. Learned learned a lot. Thank you.
Definitely hear a difference. The top one sounds full, where as the bottom sounds a little bit reverberized, as well as the top end feels a bit eqed out.
I liked the first one more than the quiter one. The first one sounds a bit more fuller and has a bit more low end to it. While the quiter one sound’s a bit flat and cold. I prefer the first one that has more warmth to it. But it depends on wich context the guitar is gonna be in. If it’s an acoustic session/song or if it’s more of a background ambience for edm and so on. I usually like to record a few dbs under -1 db. Around -5 to -6 db. Just to have some gain so I don’t have to spend to much time trying to boost the sound without clipping or compressing too much.
Its sounds like the freq between 100 - 400 are more pronounced on the high volume top recording. If the low recording is Eq'ED to lift the lows, I believe the difference will be irrelevant. Especially if this will be mixed along 10-30 other tracks. The real lesson here IMO, is the guitar (very rich, bright and warm tone) and the playing (clean with no heavy string buzzing from heavy hitting).
Audio interfaces can have noisey preamps like the Focusrite 2i2 because they have a high noise floor which gives loads of white noise in the recording
Great test with no mucking about cheers!
Great lesson, thank you, subscribed!
Michael really you are great..I really follow you a lot...
Brilliant! Loving the scientific approach!
Definitely hear a cleaner sound in the higher gain setting version. I feel the lower gain setting with amplified gain later has almost like a higher resonance/reverb sound -- which could just be the subtle enhancement of the noise that is also amplified (could be all in my head, but just my thoughts).
Thanks for always been there, there is no way i can pay you.
It was exactly what I needed. Thank you.
Whats interesting is I have the 3000$ Neumann U 87 , and its te exact opposite of what. you said and what was shown 🤔 Makes me very curious , cause when I record low and turn it up as you did the static or room noise is much louder tan if I recorded at a higher level. So with expensive top of the line equipment it is for me te exact opposite of what was shown here & more along the lines of what you said you expected at first. Very Odd Indeed.
7:05 : the one that was boosted definetly sounds boxier to me , like less defined but it's subtle.
It's subtle but it's definitely something there that isn't quite as good :)
@@inthemix totally 😊
Perhaps maybe "background noise" is audio interference caused by components used in cheaper microphones and amplifiers where small discrepancies multiply ...example is a cheap HiFi amp jack up the volume when with input is unconnected and hear the noise......Look up (or visit the PYE museum Cambridge) there is a 6 track mixing console with the lid off inside is mostly air!! ...then listern to Led Zepplin recordings made at Headley Grange....this was advanced cutting edge for late 1960s....equipment was the very best...also worth a listern is "Tell Star" released as a ground breaking 45 single. early 60s then with idle curiosity lookup method of how that was recorded. Im from the period of Phillips compact cassett......nothing is new its just re learnt...
It must be the equipment that I have, but the test done with the tone, I could not tell the difference, even with my headphones.
Bro! Thanks for this important information.
1. We also need a tutorial on How to mix Vocals of Two singers or more. (DT s) and Choir
2. Surround mixing.
Please make videos on these two if you really think they are useful.
THANK YOU
whenever i'd watched your tutorial it's inspire me so much
thanks for hardwork for this
all your vdo guide me to make my own in my language for best way for peoples in my country
wish your healty good everyday and god bless you my great teacher on youtube
you are something else sir
Hi Mike and thanks for wonderful tutorials😍, may you make a tutorial or explain about difference between pick , rms , db and UV !? Please it's so important for me
Thanks
I always use SPAN so that I can make sure there is a similar level of base frequencies, mid-range and high frequencies. Maybe that is cheating, but I know that if I can get great results with that, my music will sound good. I always aim for a mix of 0db too.
Thank you so much, your videos are just wonderful
Its hard for me to hear a difference no matter how hard I tried...they both sound the same to me. Great vid as always! Thanx for sharing. Greetings from California
Recording at -18 dB means you're using only 13 of the available 16 bits, even if you're at 24 bit internal.
So instead of that nice 96 dB dynamic range, you're now recording with 78 dB dynamic range.
Very few people understand that analogue is NOT digital.
Bill P.
@@BenDover84932 As close to 0 dBFS as possible without going 'over'.
Just like analogue.
I don't 'buy into' this -18 dB nonsense, as you can see.
Bill P.