Most silencer designs leave the chamber volume ahead of the first baffle the same as that between the remaining baffles, as shown here; since pressure is highest at muzzle exit, it would seem logical to make that first chamber largest, in order to cool the gas rapidly and reduce the pressure proceeding through the remaining baffles/chambers.
A chamber can just take as much gas as it can...so it wil spread eventually through all chambers without affecting the bullets path...larger chambers hold bullet back when its filled before bullet exit.. rather make the last chamber bigger to prevent the gasses to exit in a straigth line..My opinion...
You are correct here. I just did a video on this recently. The physics will show that the larger the blast chamber the greater the decrease in initial pressure from the muzzle and thus the lower the velocity of the gas. A lot of good rifle silencers for hunting do in fact have larger blast chambers either via a bigger diameter or a longer silencer, before the actual baffles. For hunting purposes this is ok that it can be big. Of course this is only one of many designs.
@@andrejochimsen6038 One thing which has to always be taken into account unless the designer is simply designing something without a lot of modelling etc; is to avoid any unnecessary turbulence affecting the bullets trajectory, so the projectile must always be ahead of any gases.
Love it... I have mine set up like number 3 & 4. This way it holds more gas and pressure and it stays near the barrel and the center/middle longer then near the exit. when it's on the other way around, it's going to keeps the gas pressure sounds less and it's a bit louder. again When you have it the other way around it's more louder than what I was saying. That why when you watch videos from RUclips and you can still hear how loud it is when shooting from round to round. That's why they have dry and wet from that style. But the number 3 & 4 on your clip, I set up like that as stated above you don't have to run it wet because being dry the way it is, it's already quieter and no need for wet but you can still have it wet but it's not going to make much differences.
I don’t know as much about tactical attachments as the guns themselves and I’m not criticizing because again I don’t know, but wouldn’t this be a flash guard?
nice. is there some kind of value that you can come up with for the rate and temperature at which the exhaust gasses exit the muzzle of the suppressor for each design? It would be good to see a quantitative figure of which is most effective.
+JonDavid Hi! That's a brilliant idea... let's see: perhaps if you changed the composition of the initial reaction. The materials, I mean. That would change the temperature of the gases, and yes, you could tell the temperature by hovering the cursor over different areas. Also: using the "Heat Display Mode" would allow you to visualize the temperature of the entire simulation (a lot less accurate, but useful if you want to see the big picture --literally) :)
Te hago una consulta: Para un silenciador calibre .22, cual es el diametro minimo interno que debe tener el silenciador para no interferir con la municion? Y en el caso del .308? Gracias
@@titaniummech9156 just type tpt.getscript(1, "autorun.lua", 1) into the console, does not work for mobile, after u type that I think you have to restart the app and a new box at the right should appear with the word lua on it, if it is there that means it worked
+Jay Dup thank you for the suggestion. I just looked up what a Tesla Valve is and I believe I can do recreate that. Stay tuned to my channel for that video ☺
Watafak apenas vuelvo a tu canal como desde hace 3 años atras y noto que ya no tienes la misma cantidad de videos como las comparaciones militares de paises, videos de bombas nucleares etc. Ni la cantidad de seguidores, que paso :,( youtube te metio una restriccion por tu contenido o algo parecido?
@@kn-technology Nimodo pues a seguir verdad? He visto lo que han hecho con los shorts y me parece una idea increible y innovador por que nunca habia visto algo similar, espero que les de frutos la idea y que logren volver a poner de pie al canal
Adding a large blast chamber before the start of the baffle stack would greatly improve the performance of the suppressor. A large blast chamber allows for the rapid cooling of the gases which allows maximum performance of the baffle stack. The suppressors main purpose is to slow a bullet causing it to go from super sonic to sub sonic. You'll find Integrally suppressed firearms with the barrel inside the suppressor with ports just past the chamber to be more effective. Being Integrally suppressed allows more of the high pressure gas to cool and dissipate before ever reaching the baffle stack making the firearm much much more quieter. Cool video it's actually really kinda interesting to see the process in action.
Well that's a very detailed explanation! I would love to make an experiment to try that. Unfortunately I don't have the resources right now, but I have an idea on how to make it happen irl. I would just need to buy or lend the right equipment 😬
@@kn-technology I'm Retired Marine Corps Force Recon my mos was 0326 (Recon Man Parachute and Combatant Driver Qualified) i Retired as a Gysgt. I'm also a 100% Disabled OIF/OEF Veteran I served 2 deployments in Iraq and 3 in Afghanistan. The MP5SD was my first introduction to the wonderful world of suppressed firearms. When i first disassembled it I was surprised by how simple the suppressor design was. After that i decided to learn everything possible about suppressors how they worked how they were made. The ability to make a firearm that's by design loud quiet by adding a tube with multiple chambers made by adding angled washers or individual baffles fascinating. I actually have recently submitted the paperwork for a Class 2 SOT as well as submitted my ATF Form 7 i am starting my own Company to manufacture and sell Suppressors. I already have a building and all necessary equipment needed to begin Manufacturing suppressors soon approval of my Class 2 SOT and FFL Form 7. Let me know if you are interested in staying in touch.
Wow, I'm honestly impressed about your qualifications and your project! I hope you have your manufacturing company up and running by now 😊 And sure, if you'd like to make a collaboration or showcase your suppressors on this channel, let me know (you can contact me by going to my channel info > view email on a desktop device) 😊
Love this I would also love to see it with an expansion chamber in the beginning
I'm so happy to see recent comments on here. The Powder Community lives!
Right on brother!
@@kn-technology I thought you didn't know English.
I also play Powder toy version 95.
Long live!
@@aurele2989 Agreed
@@WretchedHobbit hi there! :3
Most silencer designs leave the chamber volume ahead of the first baffle the same as that between the remaining baffles, as shown here; since pressure is highest at muzzle exit, it would seem logical to make that first chamber largest, in order to cool the gas rapidly and reduce the pressure proceeding through the remaining baffles/chambers.
+George Steele that seems very reasonable 😐
A chamber can just take as much gas as it can...so it wil spread eventually through all chambers without affecting the bullets path...larger chambers hold bullet back when its filled before bullet exit.. rather make the last chamber bigger to prevent the gasses to exit in a straigth line..My opinion...
@@andrejochimsen6038 stop with the...periods...please...
You are correct here. I just did a video on this recently. The physics will show that the larger the blast chamber the greater the decrease in initial pressure from the muzzle and thus the lower the velocity of the gas. A lot of good rifle silencers for hunting do in fact have larger blast chambers either via a bigger diameter or a longer silencer, before the actual baffles. For hunting purposes this is ok that it can be big. Of course this is only one of many designs.
@@andrejochimsen6038 One thing which has to always be taken into account unless the designer is simply designing something without a lot of modelling etc; is to avoid any unnecessary turbulence affecting the bullets trajectory, so the projectile must always be ahead of any gases.
Love it... I have mine set up like number 3 & 4. This way it holds more gas and pressure and it stays near the barrel and the center/middle longer then near the exit. when it's on the other way around, it's going to keeps the gas pressure sounds less and it's a bit louder. again When you have it the other way around it's more louder than what I was saying. That why when you watch videos from RUclips and you can still hear how loud it is when shooting from round to round. That's why they have dry and wet from that style. But the number 3 & 4 on your clip, I set up like that as stated above you don't have to run it wet because being dry the way it is, it's already quieter and no need for wet but you can still have it wet but it's not going to make much differences.
That's some cool insight, thanks for sharing! 😊
Angle the virtual walls on the last design, make it harder for the gas to reflect out. Great video.
Thanks! 😁✌️
I really like this visual modeling. Well done!
Thanks 😁
Damn, always wanted to make a silencer in TPT. Thanks!
You're welcome 😊
More like a flash hider but still awesome!
I don’t know as much about tactical attachments as the guns themselves and I’m not criticizing because again I don’t know, but wouldn’t this be a flash guard?
Try the same with Tesla's valve.
So what design reduced the db the best??
nice. is there some kind of value that you can come up with for the rate and temperature at which the exhaust gasses exit the muzzle of the suppressor for each design? It would be good to see a quantitative figure of which is most effective.
+JonDavid Hi! That's a brilliant idea... let's see: perhaps if you changed the composition of the initial reaction. The materials, I mean. That would change the temperature of the gases, and yes, you could tell the temperature by hovering the cursor over different areas. Also: using the "Heat Display Mode" would allow you to visualize the temperature of the entire simulation (a lot less accurate, but useful if you want to see the big picture --literally) :)
Very best animation i found. Thanks
You're welcome 😊✌
The main problem is getting most of those gasses into the chambers and cooling before it gets sucked out
+Someone Random right! :)
Now i wonder how many people have ever played tpt before getting this in recommended
i did
I just started like 3 days ago xD
Thank you for watching this video! And hello to all Power Toy enthusiasts still going well into the 2020s!✌
+SoulFul Diva gracias! ☺☺☺
Thanks! And I will check out your RUclips channel 😊⭐
@@kn-technology ยลยยลลลบบบบยยบบบบบบยบลบลลลลยลยฐบบบบบบบบบบบบนฐฐบบบบบบลลบบบฝฝ
ฝฝ
ขชขลบลบฃชชชลจบนนลลงลจฃจฅ๖ใ
ลตงงจบคยฃฃยจฃลตจบฃฃฃฃ0
bruh
What happens if you put shape of a car in front? It seems you can analyze car's aerodynamics without going through OpenFOAM.
what did you use for the explosive and the walls to hold it in, also the ignitor? used gun powder and fire but not getting the same power.
Man, it was so long ago, I really don't remember... But I think the yellow part might be gas. But I can't recall exactly what it was. Sorry 😢
@@kn-technology no worry cool video!
Gas and tnt, fire for igniter
Nice, yeah, I think that's right!
@@ElectricGun100 i thought it was termite
This is really cool. What soft did you use?
Hi! It's called Powder Toy and it's free 😊
Hey man what did you use as explosion?
I can't recall... Gas, I think, with a spark in the rear of the chamber (but I honestly can't tell you for sure) :(
@@kn-technology thanks
HEY! what material is used to block the explosion, which breaks soon after?
+Vincent Sluga sorry, I can't recall exactly what I used, but I believe it was a thin layer of TNT. Good luck! ☺
@@kn-technology yes it was as it made embers
Your model doesn't account for the bullet obstruction as the gasses are released or as the bullet passes the baffles.
True, although TPT isn't the best program to test this stuff with moving objects. Because, you see, no physics objects, like bullets.
Te hago una consulta: Para un silenciador calibre .22, cual es el diametro minimo interno que debe tener el silenciador para no interferir con la municion? Y en el caso del .308?
Gracias
+ALBERTO EMILIO Ridella me gustaría ayudarte pero no dispongo de esa información 😐😯
If you have bad fps on tpt, install the lua script loader and get max FPS, it is soo good, I from 60/70 got 300fps
can you explain how i install it and where i can find it
@@titaniummech9156 just type
tpt.getscript(1, "autorun.lua", 1)
into the console, does not work for mobile, after u type that I think you have to restart the app and a new box at the right should appear with the word lua on it, if it is there that means it worked
could you run a simulation with a tesla valve. Very curious as to what would happen.
+Jay Dup thank you for the suggestion. I just looked up what a Tesla Valve is and I believe I can do recreate that. Stay tuned to my channel for that video ☺
Awsome...
Watafak apenas vuelvo a tu canal como desde hace 3 años atras y noto que ya no tienes la misma cantidad de videos como las comparaciones militares de paises, videos de bombas nucleares etc. Ni la cantidad de seguidores, que paso
:,( youtube te metio una restriccion por tu contenido o algo parecido?
Algo parecido 🥲
@@kn-technology Chale 😔
@@kn-technology Nimodo pues a seguir verdad? He visto lo que han hecho con los shorts y me parece una idea increible y innovador por que nunca habia visto algo similar, espero que les de frutos la idea y que logren volver a poner de pie al canal
Si, muchas gracias, estoy tratando de revivir el canal y tu comentario es muy valioso para saber que sí vale la pena 😺
Adding a large blast chamber before the start of the baffle stack would greatly improve the performance of the suppressor. A large blast chamber allows for the rapid cooling of the gases which allows maximum performance of the baffle stack. The suppressors main purpose is to slow a bullet causing it to go from super sonic to sub sonic. You'll find Integrally suppressed firearms with the barrel inside the suppressor with ports just past the chamber to be more effective. Being Integrally suppressed allows more of the high pressure gas to cool and dissipate before ever reaching the baffle stack making the firearm much much more quieter. Cool video it's actually really kinda interesting to see the process in action.
Well that's a very detailed explanation! I would love to make an experiment to try that. Unfortunately I don't have the resources right now, but I have an idea on how to make it happen irl. I would just need to buy or lend the right equipment 😬
@@kn-technology
I'm Retired Marine Corps Force Recon my mos was 0326 (Recon Man Parachute and Combatant Driver Qualified) i Retired as a Gysgt. I'm also a 100% Disabled OIF/OEF Veteran I served 2 deployments in Iraq and 3 in Afghanistan. The MP5SD was my first introduction to the wonderful world of suppressed firearms. When i first disassembled it I was surprised by how simple the suppressor design was. After that i decided to learn everything possible about suppressors how they worked how they were made. The ability to make a firearm that's by design loud quiet by adding a tube with multiple chambers made by adding angled washers or individual baffles fascinating. I actually have recently submitted the paperwork for a Class 2 SOT as well as submitted my ATF Form 7 i am starting my own Company to manufacture and sell Suppressors. I already have a building and all necessary equipment needed to begin Manufacturing suppressors soon approval of my Class 2 SOT and FFL Form 7. Let me know if you are interested in staying in touch.
A suppressor doesn't slow a bullet down!
Wow, I'm honestly impressed about your qualifications and your project! I hope you have your manufacturing company up and running by now 😊 And sure, if you'd like to make a collaboration or showcase your suppressors on this channel, let me know (you can contact me by going to my channel info > view email on a desktop device) 😊
wich of this system is more eficient to .380 pistol?
System 3 was most effective, so I'd guess that's the case for most firearms.
Including the .380, of course.
Super.Thx from Ukraine
Thank you for commenting ☺️
Which one is better silencer?
3 has proven best in this scenario.
Where of disig is the best. Pleas coment
Hola que programa usaste para el simulador por favor
Hola! Se llama Powder Toy (puedes googlearlo y descargarlo gratis 😊)
But what is it better?
Where can I find the software?
Powdertoy.uk.co i think
I don't know if you've managed to find it after two months, but the site is powdertoy.co.uk/
You'll find the download somewhere there.
It's called the powder toy, just Google it, it's free to download
Ok. Who's more efective?
+SS 88 which design is more effective? You'd have to test each one, measuring the sound produced by each. That's the only way to know for sure.
Это разве глушители? У нас их называют банками, или ПСБ.
In English please, so I can answer 😭
Nice
0:40 pure satisfaction
👏👏👏top
Qual superior o modelo é o melhor???
IMMA SHUT MAH LAZER!
+The Unipady Unipader lol 😂
Interesting ,entertaining
Good
WoW!
yeas.. World of Warcraft
xD
softWare?
A game call The Powder Toy
Mô tả cho luồng âm thanh thì ok. Luồng khí thì vl
Ok
That's not a silencer that's a compressor and no fire exists it so...
im prob wrong but what ever
All are bad designs.