I was hoping that they would expand either west to add the Mycenaeans and Minoans or east to add the Assyrians and Babylonians hopefully they are in the plan somewhere considering they were also major bronze age civilizations
I really hope Pharaoh will still get support for a while, we need to see all these civilizations because it's very unlikely we'll get another late Bronze Age Total War after that.
This is just the first small DLC/update, they said Pharaoh will get support throughout 2024 and they also already said they have plans for a free map expansion that adds new cultures.
Big fan of the differences between the Sea Peoples and the other factions. Really like that one of their paths is also available to other factions. Irsu is going to enjoy this patch very much, I can tell. ;)
We can probably see Palatial Mycenaean Civilization still. Late Helladic IIIB is dated (wikipedia) between circa 1330 or 1315 to 1210 or 1200 BC. I guess it really depends on what chronology they are using. Though the traditional dating of the Trojan War is dated between 1194-1184 BC and Total War Saga Troy does mention Ramesses III in event. Ramesses himself ruled Egypt between circa 1186 to 1150 BC.
That should make it even more of braindead decision to make it combined campaigns. What is 10-30 years, especially in this setting that's almost like a fantastical tale to us?
@@AlecFortescue Now they could do this. In Troy there is an event that Ramesses III sends you a gift. So Troy is actually set slightly after the start of TW Pharaoh. They are probably using the old traditional dating of the Trojan War, if it happened, of 1194-1184 BC. Ramesses III ruled Egypt between 1186-1155 BC. TW Pharaoh's start date is 1205 BC in the final years of Merneptah's regin.
@@jdkr97 many things that i wont re explain here. I already had this argument many times months ago. Tldr: Its got the same gameplay as Troy. With minor adjustments and minimum innovation. Same bugs and broken engine. Marketed as a full historical non saga game despite being one.
@@Tomo_mo Since December 15, 2023. Total War Pharaoh is cheaper than Total War Saga Troy. Troy is $49.99 and Pharaoh is $39.99. Pharaoh is twice the size of Troy. Pharaoh is 50 GB while Troy is 26 GB. Then
I'd like to see a (free) expansion including all big cultures missing. Assyria, Babalon, Mycenae/Minoan. Maybe a paid one with a "Rise of the copper age" campaign that shows early Mesopotamian civilization spreading leading up to the fall.
Ancient Egyptians had access to huge amounts of protien, anabolic steroids and had a big gym culture. That's why they all looked like this. Well done CA
Druzhina(Дружина) translates like a squad united by friendship. Because of word Друг(friend) and verb Дружить (be friends/ have a friendship). They’re were the closest guardian squad to tsar or knyaz. Usually they are heavily armoured unbreakable cavaliers. Your “druzhina” is much like Caucasian Ataman.(actual name of your generic lord)
I wonder if Nehekhara encountered the Warhammer Fantasy equivalent of Sea Peoples? Perhaps the Dark Elves of Naggaroth looking for new slaves or the Norscan raiders that travel around the world to plunder and take lives for Chaos.
Actually, this is exactly what happened in the lore. For example, Nagash learned Black Magic from dark elves prisoners who came to raid the coast with a black ark.
i havent touched total war. since attilla. there were no actual progression in the franchise, just copy paste. more in depth battles. more in depth campaign maps. more city building and sieging. give us a muddy gritty medieval and get this amazing franchise back on track.
I hope CA persist with Pharaoh. It would be a shame if this title was dropped purely because of all the brats who spat the dummy when they didn't get Medieval 3. Pharaoh is a good game, and I'm sure the new content will make it even better.
Yes, people dislike the game because and only because they didnt get medieval 3 and not because the game sucks. Theyre brats i agree, how dare they complain about not getting a game the entire TW community been asking for a decade.
My point is that Pharaoh was written off by large sections of the community, well before it was ever released. The criticism it has received has often been unfair and unwarranted, not to mention being deeply disrespectful to the men and women who worked on the game. Pharaoh is a bit more complex than most of the recent Total War titles (War Hammer), but if you bother to actually learn the game it is fun and a good challenge. Some people (like yourself?) might not appreciate the game, that is fair enough, but the community should stop all this incessant complaining. It is not a good look. I too hope that we'll get Medieval 3 sometime in the future and that hopefully too it'll be to your ( and all the others) satisfaction.@@Tomo_mo
Love the Total War series and this looks good. Give me the Minoans, Assyrians, and the Babylonians. Also it is time Total War does a Persian Army Total War pre Alexander the Great.
I hope one day the Ottoman Empire will come and you will do great things with the Janissary Band. Greetings from Turkey, we love all the Total War series.
@@hoodedwizard4695 CA is unable to develop new games and instead just keep releasing same game with reskin and some new stuff glued together until it breaks. Current total war is nightmare even for individual developers who would like to make the best work they can (read leaks). But nothing will change because some people keep buying them and there is barely competition
This has been a problem with total war games since Shōgun 2. The scale is very small now, and most battles don't involve varied terrain, they involve a fight over a single hill, or a single valley with a few patches of trees
@@HelixWek Terrain in Pharaoh is very diverse, possibly the most diverse in the franchise. The physical size of the map is what is small, which becomes a problem if you play with very large unit sizes.
@@maou8253 Yeah Pharaoh has done a great job moving battle maps in the right direction, but they're still very small and arcadey. Not NEARLY as bad as Warhammer--which was awful battle maps. But still not as believable feeling and strategically-significant as they've been in the past.
@@xiuhcoatl4830 700 players for the 24 hour peak. three kingdoms is 8.8k. Even the ORIGINAL Rome 1 sits at 1k. Rome 2 sits at 6k. I guess youre right. Someone wanted this game. all 700 people are playing it and its their newest game. Those are historical numbers btw. WH3 is at 45k. oh, and this games all time peak was 5.4k. So no one wanted it.
It wouldn't hurt to make the games people ask for instead of expanding on a game no one asked for. So many features claimed as new that existed before Rome 2.
That's what Total War always was, it's nothing new. Medieval 2 was copy paste from Rome 1, Napoleon from Empire, Attila from Rome 2, ToB from Attila, WH2 and 3 from WH1 and now Pharaoh from Troy. That's just what CA always did.
Thank you Creative Assembly. Thank you for creating a map of an ENTIRE region, blurring half of it off, and only adding two notable factions to an entire TW game. Truly geniuses of our time.
They already announced a free campaign map expansion that comes later this year that adds more regions and new cultures outside the current map. But you're still right, releasing it in this unfinished state and expecting people to like it was ridiculous. The game isn't even bad, it's quite good, but clearly incomplete in it's current state.
@@lp4514 I'm pessimistic we're getting any factions such as Assyria, Babylon, Myceneans, etc. If anything, this game should've been almost identical to TW Attila-- considering this was a period of mass migration of various stateless tribes battling for their survival as they settled new lands. There's a ridiculous amount of possible content and features they chose to ignore.
@@zack2804 It's not that they chose to ignore it, more like they (the studio making it) didn't get the time and resources from CA to put everything in the game on release. They only had about 2 years to make the game, which isn't much, and they are a lot smaller as a studio than the main historical team. And as I said, they already confirmed there will be a map expansion with new cultures and there aren't that much options for cultures. It may not be all cultures you mentioned, but some of them are almost certainly part of that. We should get news about that in the next few weeks since they said they show more of what that looks like after High Tide releases.
They already said they have plans to expand the map for free and add more cultures. Still nothing wrong with getting additional new factions on the current map too.
I mean there is barely anyone playing this disaster of a game so I think the community definitely put their foot down with crappy saga games not beeing enough anymore. Now CA finally has to prove again what it means to create a truly good game.
In this Sea Peoples DLC will there be naval battles and landing of units in battle like in Rome 2 and Attila? No? Will they be sea people without a navy? It's getting better and better lol
No, there won't be... because it's the bloody bronze age. Naval combat at the time was in its infancy, and they certainly hadn't developed strategies like boarding. The sea peoples are called that... because they came from the sea... nobody really knows which were their lands of origin, although there are various theories. Their ships were, more than likely, transport galleys. They weren't Atlanteans or anything...
@@ProduccionesPaquito And to add to this, what's the point of adding landing battles? All it does is add five minutes waiting for your troops to disembark on shore.
Sea People didn't have a navy and Sea People weren't involved in any naval battles the we know of, not even a single one. They're just regular soldiers in transport ships that came from another country.
@@ProduccionesPaquito I would only partially agree with you: beach landing battles like those in Rome2/Attila would be desirable; I actually don't need real naval battles at sea in a Bronze Age game. But you have to say: It's a shame that we haven't had any real naval battles since ToB.
Yawn. Reused mechanics from past TW games under a different presentation or sructure. This game is still not worth a single penny. CA has not innovated since WH-1.
I believe the outposts were mentioned before. It used to be a thing in Rome TW. I'd be nice to see this franchise keep and improve all the good mechanics that used to be present as well as introduce new ones
The real Sea People weren't involved in any naval battles (in general naval battles weren't really a thing yet in the Bronze Age). They're just called that because people didn't know where they came from, so they called them people from the sea. But they didn't have a navy, were not good sailors or anything, they're just regular soldiers on transport ships.
@@lp4514 yeah no a lot of battles were fought on ships often close to the shore. As bad a game it is, Rome 2 could manage these hybrid battles yet Pharaoh doesn't even have naval battles at all
![Noob To Max With DRAGON REWORK In Blox Fruits [FULL MOVIE]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/LnBMOinoOvA/mqdefault.jpg)
I was hoping that they would expand either west to add the Mycenaeans and Minoans or east to add the Assyrians and Babylonians hopefully they are in the plan somewhere considering they were also major bronze age civilizations
I really hope Pharaoh will still get support for a while, we need to see all these civilizations because it's very unlikely we'll get another late Bronze Age Total War after that.
That wouldn't have been the first DLC.
This is just the first small DLC/update, they said Pharaoh will get support throughout 2024 and they also already said they have plans for a free map expansion that adds new cultures.
Well this is a free update, we still have the dlcs.
@@lp4514 i do wonder if we still gonna get the second campaign map dlc though
Big fan of the differences between the Sea Peoples and the other factions. Really like that one of their paths is also available to other factions.
Irsu is going to enjoy this patch very much, I can tell. ;)
The Old Crocodile smells blood in the Water!
Irsu vs Peleset Dude be epic to see
Pharaoh may not be a perfect title but GOD DAMN the sea peoples are different from anything we've seen. That balanced way of the sea is awesome
I hope map expansion will include greece with dorians and mycenaean remnants
We can probably see Palatial Mycenaean Civilization still. Late Helladic IIIB is dated (wikipedia) between circa 1330 or 1315 to 1210 or 1200 BC. I guess it really depends on what chronology they are using. Though the traditional dating of the Trojan War is dated between 1194-1184 BC and Total War Saga Troy does mention Ramesses III in event. Ramesses himself ruled Egypt between circa 1186 to 1150 BC.
That should make it even more of braindead decision to make it combined campaigns. What is 10-30 years, especially in this setting that's almost like a fantastical tale to us?
@@AlecFortescue Now they could do this. In Troy there is an event that Ramesses III sends you a gift. So Troy is actually set slightly after the start of TW Pharaoh. They are probably using the old traditional dating of the Trojan War, if it happened, of 1194-1184 BC. Ramesses III ruled Egypt between 1186-1155 BC. TW Pharaoh's start date is 1205 BC in the final years of Merneptah's regin.
Well they are now
Thank you CA for following through and making this game worth wile for those who gave you their trust.
Pharaoh is actually a very good game. Love to see more of it.
Agreed. It's unfortunate that many people disliked the game simply because they were hoping for Medieval 3 or Empire 2.
And I want a Medieval 3 tbh.
@@jdkr97 brother i know its unbelievable to you. But some people out there dislike the game simply because it sucks.
@@Tomo_mo why it sucks ? what do you don't like about the game ?
@@jdkr97 many things that i wont re explain here. I already had this argument many times months ago. Tldr: Its got the same gameplay as Troy. With minor adjustments and minimum innovation. Same bugs and broken engine. Marketed as a full historical non saga game despite being one.
@@Tomo_mo Since December 15, 2023. Total War Pharaoh is cheaper than Total War Saga Troy. Troy is $49.99 and Pharaoh is $39.99. Pharaoh is twice the size of Troy. Pharaoh is 50 GB while Troy is 26 GB. Then
I'd like to see a (free) expansion including all big cultures missing. Assyria, Babalon, Mycenae/Minoan. Maybe a paid one with a "Rise of the copper age" campaign that shows early Mesopotamian civilization spreading leading up to the fall.
Well you got your wish
This looks interesting. A step in the right right direction
The Mechanics looks great nice done
Sea People bringing in the Splash Zone!
horde/semi-horde factions are always a big hype for me, very interested to played Sea People :>
they should add more semi-horde factions in the series.
@@devinphillips8085 so far my fav semi-horde is Vampire Coast, especially playing as Noctilus or Sartosa.
Ancient Egyptians had access to huge amounts of protien, anabolic steroids and had a big gym culture.
That's why they all looked like this. Well done CA
Just because ur a neek
When the Sea Peoples go for a walk, they ask Egypt how's their health plan.
Apparently it was great.
unit look incredibly beautiful
Looks Decent...Cautiously optimistic CA! Good job!
Normans and continental Vikings for Thrones of Britannia when?
BRO WE NEED MEDIEVAL 2 , ROME 3 , EMPIRES 2
Druzhina(Дружина) translates like a squad united by friendship. Because of word Друг(friend) and verb Дружить (be friends/ have a friendship). They’re were the closest guardian squad to tsar or knyaz. Usually they are heavily armoured unbreakable cavaliers.
Your “druzhina” is much like Caucasian Ataman.(actual name of your generic lord)
Three days left! 🌊🌊🌊🌊
Nice expansion for all those 10 people playing this
Just a few days left before release. Can't wait to play a Kurunta campaign again!
Looks very interesting; can't wait to play it!
So excited for this! LOVING Pharaoh and I can't wait to play this expansion! Thank you for making it free!
you dont fool anyone, paid bot
Bot comment.
Please make a video on how the sea people's religion works how their encampment works and how creating a dynasty works
Looks good would love to see some of these horde mechanics make there way into warhammer three.
I wonder if Nehekhara encountered the Warhammer Fantasy equivalent of Sea Peoples?
Perhaps the Dark Elves of Naggaroth looking for new slaves or the Norscan raiders that travel around the world to plunder and take lives for Chaos.
the skaven
Actually, this is exactly what happened in the lore. For example, Nagash learned Black Magic from dark elves prisoners who came to raid the coast with a black ark.
Why don’t you add naval battles or at least port assaults / amphibious landings
Time to pillage and raid tombs.
Glad this is free. Might just pick up this game on sale now.
Ok i'm hyped now
Still no family tree
i havent touched total war. since attilla. there were no actual progression in the franchise, just copy paste.
more in depth battles. more in depth campaign maps. more city building and sieging. give us a muddy gritty medieval and get this amazing franchise back on track.
I hope CA persist with Pharaoh. It would be a shame if this title was dropped purely because of all the brats who spat the dummy when they didn't get Medieval 3. Pharaoh is a good game, and I'm sure the new content will make it even better.
Yes, people dislike the game because and only because they didnt get medieval 3 and not because the game sucks. Theyre brats i agree, how dare they complain about not getting a game the entire TW community been asking for a decade.
My point is that Pharaoh was written off by large sections of the community, well before it was ever released. The criticism it has received has often been unfair and unwarranted, not to mention being deeply disrespectful to the men and women who worked on the game. Pharaoh is a bit more complex than most of the recent Total War titles (War Hammer), but if you bother to actually learn the game it is fun and a good challenge. Some people (like yourself?) might not appreciate the game, that is fair enough, but the community should stop all this incessant complaining. It is not a good look. I too hope that we'll get Medieval 3 sometime in the future and that hopefully too it'll be to your ( and all the others) satisfaction.@@Tomo_mo
@@adrianthompson5250Lol what a reddit response.
I hope that this isn't the last new faction and that we will see amazigh (libu) playable factions the same as mitanni or israel
They said they have plans for a free map expansion that will add new cultures.
Mitanni were gone by this time. They got annexed by the Middle Assyrian Empire fully around 1260 BC.
looks good, but where's the Blood dlc?
I like Pharaoh so far... But yeah, I do want blood
It looks very very cool !!
Love the Total War series and this looks good. Give me the Minoans, Assyrians, and the Babylonians. Also it is time Total War does a Persian Army Total War pre Alexander the Great.
A bit monotone lads...
Im gonna just say this as a guy who owns both Pharaoh and WH3 but please give these mechanics to Norsca, it really fits them
I hope one day the Ottoman Empire will come and you will do great things with the Janissary Band. Greetings from Turkey, we love all the Total War series.
Top quality as always, ignore the haters!
They´ve been ignoring the "haters" for ages, it´s time to start to listen to them.
@@PROVOCATEURSK that's so stupid.
"Yes CA, you should Listen to the People Who Actively Hate the Game and Want it to Die."
@@hoodedwizard4695 CA is unable to develop new games and instead just keep releasing same game with reskin and some new stuff glued together until it breaks. Current total war is nightmare even for individual developers who would like to make the best work they can (read leaks). But nothing will change because some people keep buying them and there is barely competition
This magnificent!
Cant wait to develop my political compass with Robert Baratheon and Sigvald the Magnificent 😍😍😍
Too little too late CA!! Give us a gritty Lord of the Rings total war and I might forgive you
This looks great, really love the direction, hoping we get more players on board with this game and the Mycenaeans and Mesopotamians are on the way!
Bot comment.
How to ride Ox Carts?
Fine, I will figure out by myself
They give us an inch and alm the simps fawn over them again
Why there is no Blood dlc yet? you kiddin me CA
Please add blood, Greece, and amphibious assaults (they are the *sea* people after all)
There really isnt a reason to add sea battles to this game. The Sea Warfare of the time was very undeveloped, so it would be very meh to experience.
@@hoodedwizard4695 I never liked sea battles anyway
i want battle map to be bigger
This has been a problem with total war games since Shōgun 2. The scale is very small now, and most battles don't involve varied terrain, they involve a fight over a single hill, or a single valley with a few patches of trees
@@HelixWek Terrain in Pharaoh is very diverse, possibly the most diverse in the franchise. The physical size of the map is what is small, which becomes a problem if you play with very large unit sizes.
@@maou8253 Yeah Pharaoh has done a great job moving battle maps in the right direction, but they're still very small and arcadey. Not NEARLY as bad as Warhammer--which was awful battle maps. But still not as believable feeling and strategically-significant as they've been in the past.
Let's hope we see expanding dlc adding more interesting cultures instead of expanding the existing ones
They said they have plans for a free map expansion that adds new cultures.
Can yall put out something like another napoleon or perhaps one that takes place late 1800s not just in japan
Here is the same information that was in the last video. Nothing new
This is actulay so cool! I allways wanted to burn the world (man this got it out wrong)
when will come rome to conquer these weak folks???
Nice.
Give me boats to fight with, by God!
👍👍
When launch The Blood Dlc?
We never wanted this game. We wanted Empire 2, Medieval 3, Rome 3, Shogun 3. Start listenijg to your audience. You NEVER DO. Easy money. Unbelievable.
We? Who's we? Speak for yourself, clown
@@xiuhcoatl4830 700 players for the 24 hour peak. three kingdoms is 8.8k. Even the ORIGINAL Rome 1 sits at 1k. Rome 2 sits at 6k. I guess youre right. Someone wanted this game. all 700 people are playing it and its their newest game. Those are historical numbers btw. WH3 is at 45k.
oh, and this games all time peak was 5.4k. So no one wanted it.
Blood dlc when?
News on Sarthoreal or Engrimm van Horstman (because the cult mechanic is jsut perfect for him) coming to WH3 when?
Basically the horde mechanics from Total War: Troy but with some additions and improvements. Nice.
Give us blood dlc
It wouldn't hurt to make the games people ask for instead of expanding on a game no one asked for. So many features claimed as new that existed before Rome 2.
oh wow royal decree is pretty cool
copy and paste again a game? sad
That's what Total War always was, it's nothing new. Medieval 2 was copy paste from Rome 1, Napoleon from Empire, Attila from Rome 2, ToB from Attila, WH2 and 3 from WH1 and now Pharaoh from Troy. That's just what CA always did.
cant wait ruinous insight to play this
All anyone is gunna do is complain before releasing everyone was praising the Bronze Age then after releasing everyone hated it too bland lol
Thank you Creative Assembly. Thank you for creating a map of an ENTIRE region, blurring half of it off, and only adding two notable factions to an entire TW game. Truly geniuses of our time.
They already announced a free campaign map expansion that comes later this year that adds more regions and new cultures outside the current map. But you're still right, releasing it in this unfinished state and expecting people to like it was ridiculous. The game isn't even bad, it's quite good, but clearly incomplete in it's current state.
@@lp4514 I'm pessimistic we're getting any factions such as Assyria, Babylon, Myceneans, etc. If anything, this game should've been almost identical to TW Attila-- considering this was a period of mass migration of various stateless tribes battling for their survival as they settled new lands. There's a ridiculous amount of possible content and features they chose to ignore.
@@zack2804 It's not that they chose to ignore it, more like they (the studio making it) didn't get the time and resources from CA to put everything in the game on release. They only had about 2 years to make the game, which isn't much, and they are a lot smaller as a studio than the main historical team.
And as I said, they already confirmed there will be a map expansion with new cultures and there aren't that much options for cultures. It may not be all cultures you mentioned, but some of them are almost certainly part of that. We should get news about that in the next few weeks since they said they show more of what that looks like after High Tide releases.
Well I will not play this game again before blood dlc release 🗿
Bring in the HEBREWS!!!! 😮
They need to expand the map! Not add extra factions
If they expand the map, they will have to add extra factions from that time period as well.
But that's in the cards anyway.
They already said they have plans to expand the map for free and add more cultures. Still nothing wrong with getting additional new factions on the current map too.
Troy DLC
Nice 👍
BOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
I want blood !
trash
I bet the 100 people that play this game will be delighted by this.
800, last I checked
this joke is getting old. I also gave Pharaoh a shot (physical retail ver. are 10 euro) and I like it.
Yawn. Put this game out of its misery and us along with it
All of you simping for this company fully deserve to be taken advantage of.
I mean there is barely anyone playing this disaster of a game so I think the community definitely put their foot down with crappy saga games not beeing enough anymore. Now CA finally has to prove again what it means to create a truly good game.
Pls bring total war to ps5 the system can handle it and you’ll double your profits
the small issue of the controls though...
In this Sea Peoples DLC will there be naval battles and landing of units in battle like in Rome 2 and Attila? No? Will they be sea people without a navy? It's getting better and better lol
No, there won't be... because it's the bloody bronze age. Naval combat at the time was in its infancy, and they certainly hadn't developed strategies like boarding.
The sea peoples are called that... because they came from the sea... nobody really knows which were their lands of origin, although there are various theories. Their ships were, more than likely, transport galleys. They weren't Atlanteans or anything...
@@ProduccionesPaquito And to add to this, what's the point of adding landing battles? All it does is add five minutes waiting for your troops to disembark on shore.
Sea People didn't have a navy and Sea People weren't involved in any naval battles the we know of, not even a single one. They're just regular soldiers in transport ships that came from another country.
@@ProduccionesPaquito I would only partially agree with you: beach landing battles like those in Rome2/Attila would be desirable; I actually don't need real naval battles at sea in a Bronze Age game. But you have to say: It's a shame that we haven't had any real naval battles since ToB.
@@GermanOlle You have a point there, but I feel some people are asking for the moon
How can it be a "deep dive" when all the mechanics are shallow???
That's nonsense, this game has good mechanics for a Total War.
It’s still a step in the right direction. Looks pretty fun
how are these shallow? I swear yall just say things without knowing what your talking about lol
Because Medieval 2 had such deep mechanics, what with being able to start a crusade if the Pope likes you. So much depth.
lmao, I bet this guy thinks Warhammer has deep strategic mechanics. The irony of it all.
No blood for 3 month! selling basic function! Very slow update, many bugs! Trash game! Lazy emplyee! Just selling Totalwar franchise to other company!
1st
DAMNIT
dead game
I am once again here to say no one cares. gib tigermen and snakemen
Yawn. Reused mechanics from past TW games under a different presentation or sructure. This game is still not worth a single penny. CA has not innovated since WH-1.
I'm curious to know which previous game mechanics this copies. Please, enlighten us.
I believe the outposts were mentioned before. It used to be a thing in Rome TW. I'd be nice to see this franchise keep and improve all the good mechanics that used to be present as well as introduce new ones
@@Bezolden Outposts are nothing like any sort of mechanics in the past outside of some similarities to garrisonable forts.
D.I.L.L.I.G.A.F
Dilligaf
Meaning
Do I Look Like I Give A Fuc*
Yes
You definitely do. because if you didn't, you wouldn't have written this comment.
where is f..king blod dlc?
Sea People that can't fight naval battle... How high are you CA.
They came from the sea, they didn't fight on the sea.
How high are you. DO your research before this statement trolololol
The real Sea People weren't involved in any naval battles (in general naval battles weren't really a thing yet in the Bronze Age). They're just called that because people didn't know where they came from, so they called them people from the sea. But they didn't have a navy, were not good sailors or anything, they're just regular soldiers on transport ships.
@@lp4514 yeah no a lot of battles were fought on ships often close to the shore. As bad a game it is, Rome 2 could manage these hybrid battles yet Pharaoh doesn't even have naval battles at all
@@GodofToast funny, cause Rome Didnt Exist for another hundreds of years.
"Oh but in Rome II they had sea battles so every game should have them"
BRO WE NEED MEDIEVAL 2 , ROME 3 , EMPIRES 2