It will be useful against slow moving targets like drone and loitering munitions but against fighter jet and missiles it will have hard time due to their high speed and manueveravlebility
Sure but thats not what its meant for. We already have systems to take out fighter jets and missiles, these systems can take out drones, but at a exponential cost.
Actually I think the Roadrunner is not meant to shoot down fighter jet, but to shoot down hostile drone (specifically the Mavic or Shahed type). Roadrunner will never have the speed nor effective ceiling to catch up with a fighter jet, but it is very cost effective at shooting down other drone with similar price point.
@@artem_arkov Obviously Roadrunner is not meant to shoot down Mavic drone. I even explicitly mentioned "with similar price point" after all. Roadrunner is meant to shoot down larger drone such as Shahed or larger Switchblade variant.
Good job! Now, also check out some cruise missile prices. A few units with dozens of these would be great if integrated into existing ad.@@artem_arkov
This sounds cool but i have already some serious questions. Isn't it give enemy more opportunity to identify where missiles came from ? Because it have to travel back to where it came from to land . Also this sounds more expensive than regular missiles that have onetime use. What happens when it get jammed by the enemy during the flight ?
Side question. In the 90ties, a strange prototipe antitank weapon was shown. It has a liquid rocket engine under belly, and when launched, was proceding to the target in sort hops, like a bouncing ball, with course correction. Flying low, in short hops, meandering trough high weeds and bushes. What was his name, and what happened to the project?
Well, sounds too pristine. Returning to base, and verticle landing, both requires additional fuel, over half the available fuel I reckon - half for RTB + a bit more for vtol. Combined with additional weight and drag of the delta wings, I say, this missile will have much lower speed and range. Not only that after a long chase, with not enough fuel to RTB, it might land in a location easier for enemy to access.
The small launch box and drone like manuverability is more interesting to me than the return mechanism. Ukraine could deploy these on the frontline without aircraft
Not bad. Another landing option would be for the missile to tuck back into a case and ball up and open up a parachute before landing so as not to damage it.
Meh Australian companies are also doing it. are building AI drones out the wazoo now. Don't think his AI is that good either. Anduril Australia helped Australia build a AI submersible called Ghost Shark a tribute to Australia MQ28A Ghost bat most advanced AI combat drone in the world and was named this because uses the Australian AI that Ghost Bat has in it. Why if Anduril has good AI.
You know what for a channel that uses AI narration that actually sounds pretty good and as such I can watch the full video. I hate those obvious AI voices but this is a channel that I can watch. Good job
Interecting conept, however its considerably more expensive than existing MANPADS missiles without havong anywhere near the G load or speed and having considerably larger logistical requirments, not just because of the size of the vehicpe and container but also because it requires a ground control station and fuel handling, all of which has to be done by dedicated personell who cannot neccessrioy be fulfilling other combat duties, such as a MANPADS operator could. Furthermore this would be susceptable to jamming, whereas MANPADS are not. The Coyote 2 seems to be a much more practical solution to the issue of hitting quickly manouvering drones at a substantially lower cost.
@@tahsinforbusinessenquirers8520 The terms are getting quite blurred in today's battle space. You could consider it a drone a cruise missile or a missile at this point the distinction is very blurred.
Question? Who invented the VTOL Vertical take off technology? Are there patents on it? Are there pivot points on the Vertical Take off? How's the roadrunner against radar jammers? What's the radar cross signature of the roadrunner? What's the weight of the roadrunner? What's the fuel source of the roadrunner? What's the blast radius of the roadrunner?
Remove the weight first before flying , then you can aim and select what you think is the Best to dive and blast or to wait the target . My way is perpetual flying missile and can rest in the air and can wait the target . In firing is speed of light . The enemy don't know it's coming is they already hit .
It still too expensive even if the missile can be re-used, compare to $500 - 2,000 "suicide drone" for ground attack and it's too slow for surface to air combat since missile doesn't have a solid rocket motor (since it start from the ground, launch speed is 0 Mph), enemy fighter might overrun it.
Another advantage of this system is that being sub sonic it EO systems can provide higher resolution imagery that make sit hard to jam or be tricked by flares vs a supersonic missile and even provide ID where the IR seekers are much less capable of doing so due to the need for small aperture and the air turbulence that arises from super sonic flight. Also, these could be launched form most anywhere, even say from off shore wind farms which could extend air defenses over water. Also, even if it is limited to Mach .9 that should enable a head on intercept or force a fighter to turn tail and run where the Roadrunner then could loiter to prevent it then turning back. But that assumes the fighter knows it is there which it might pick it up on its radar or might not.
Also, if the Roadrunner engages aircraft on its way back home that aircraft might not have the luxury of turning away least it run out of fuel before it RTBs.
BTW, I am quite envious of your 3D animation skills and wish I could do that on my RUclips videos where I just make PowerPoint charts or hand draw stuff (and rather poorly at that).
It’s a beautiful weapon but I am thinking about what happen if it run out of fuel during interception does then it detonate itself to avoid collateral Damage
So where is the fuel tank for the jet engines?? I see Delta wings, Jet Engines, VTOL landing legs.. but I am wondering where the engine gets it fuel to lift off and fly ..and the guidance.
Can you make a video about how do bomb dropped by air plane detonate like jdam and such.cuz I see vid where the bomb penetrate a house then it detonate unlike rpg or the hamas rocket that you made vid on
subsonic means that this is nowhere close to shooting down any aircraft, it looks more like a munition to use on tanks, trucks, building and maybe helicopters
i still don’t understand one basic thing is this refueled which kind of fuel does this use anyway all sound good but what has the tests shown coz personally I don’t think this can work on a Morden battle field which leaves the ordinary air defense systems more useful
Good video. Can you make a video about how weaponized drones by Ukrainian forces work? Like how they arm the payload, how the drone release the bombs. It would be cool
It's possible by intercepting the trajectory of the jet (using AI I suppose?) that was travelling perpendicularly on a straight flight but unlikely, then and again non-western fighter pilots aren't well trained to know this. So a free kill I guess.
@@firstnamelastname1557 "Then again non-western fighters aren't well trained". There, there, that's why NATO never won against any determined opponent. Got ass whopped in Korean war, Vietnam war, and now getting decimated in Ukraine. And this shit mentality is how MICs can steal trillions on public money by selling shitty products.
![Lethal Company Music Video 🎵 "Follow The Orders" [VERSION A]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/QeooZB4Z7RA/mqdefault.jpg)
It should have a feature to shoot the warhead alone, so that the body of the missile can be returned and loaded with another.
i heard it could do that but again they could not let Artificial Intelligence to control the Kill Switch.
That’s called a drone
It does, the warhead can detach
@@BosonCollider Ok
@@Aitellyshut up
It will be useful against slow moving targets like drone and loitering munitions but against fighter jet and missiles it will have hard time due to their high speed and manueveravlebility
Yep agreed.. I would call this another loitering munition designed to target aircraft..
The larger this Road Runner Dual missile is, it with light up on radar, most fighter Jets have Radar on both ends of the aircraft , or even hidden...
Sure but thats not what its meant for. We already have systems to take out fighter jets and missiles, these systems can take out drones, but at a exponential cost.
in an integrated air defense systems, these drone can intercept and destroy cruise missiles as well. because it can fly as fast as a cruise missile
since they re networked you can get one up in front of it so you can be waiting on it.
Actually I think the Roadrunner is not meant to shoot down fighter jet, but to shoot down hostile drone (specifically the Mavic or Shahed type).
Roadrunner will never have the speed nor effective ceiling to catch up with a fighter jet, but it is very cost effective at shooting down other drone with similar price point.
Mavic price 1.5K
roadrunner price much over 100K
it's not cost-effective
@@artem_arkov Obviously Roadrunner is not meant to shoot down Mavic drone.
I even explicitly mentioned "with similar price point" after all.
Roadrunner is meant to shoot down larger drone such as Shahed or larger Switchblade variant.
Good job! Now, also check out some cruise missile prices. A few units with dozens of these would be great if integrated into existing ad.@@artem_arkov
Great Anduril commercial 😂
Glad you liked it! 😉
This sounds cool but i have already some serious questions. Isn't it give enemy more opportunity to identify where missiles came from ? Because it have to travel back to where it came from to land . Also this sounds more expensive than regular missiles that have onetime use. What happens when it get jammed by the enemy during the flight ?
batch 0 is claimed to have the price of around 100k$ each, turns out it's around the price of a Shahed. and autonomy is meant to avoid jammings
Side question. In the 90ties, a strange prototipe antitank weapon was shown. It has a liquid rocket engine under belly, and when launched, was proceding to the target in sort hops, like a bouncing ball, with course correction. Flying low, in short hops, meandering trough high weeds and bushes. What was his name, and what happened to the project?
Well, sounds too pristine. Returning to base, and verticle landing, both requires additional fuel, over half the available fuel I reckon - half for RTB + a bit more for vtol. Combined with additional weight and drag of the delta wings, I say, this missile will have much lower speed and range. Not only that after a long chase, with not enough fuel to RTB, it might land in a location easier for enemy to access.
It's flying subsonic and it will attack a jetfighter from behind? Goodluck with that...
I was thinking you could reuse it after attacking the target
Yeah same, maybe the drone would probably lack aerodynamics after releasing the heavy munition. Would need to be way more complicated
😉
That's why it's stupid concept
@@bigmock141 no it's not. To intercept a missile , two counter missile are launched. So, if one returns safely,it's a win.
@@logann6390it's short body suggest it not a highspeed aircraft and why add some complication to ground anti air
The small launch box and drone like manuverability is more interesting to me than the return mechanism. Ukraine could deploy these on the frontline without aircraft
Gotta have money
wat hapend to all its other wonderful weapons huh??😂😂😂
Ukraine won't be around that long.
And Gaza. Oh wait.... I forgot completely that Palestinians are not important.
No more taxs money for Ukraine and Israel
Thank you AiTelly Team . Merry Christmas 🎉🎉🎉🎉 and Happy prosperous New Year to your team in advance.❤❤❤🎉🎉🎉
Not bad. Another landing option would be for the missile to tuck back into a case and ball up and open up a parachute before landing so as not to damage it.
Everyone raves on about Tesla and Elon Musk. But it is Anduril that is opening the doors to future tech
Meh Australian companies are also doing it. are building AI drones out the wazoo now.
Don't think his AI is that good either.
Anduril Australia helped Australia build a AI submersible called Ghost Shark a tribute to Australia MQ28A Ghost bat most advanced AI combat drone in the world and was named this because uses the Australian AI that Ghost Bat has in it.
Why if Anduril has good AI.
Amazing description and details as always
You know what for a channel that uses AI narration that actually sounds pretty good and as such I can watch the full video. I hate those obvious AI voices but this is a channel that I can watch. Good job
Hehehe
Interecting conept, however its considerably more expensive than existing MANPADS missiles without havong anywhere near the G load or speed and having considerably larger logistical requirments, not just because of the size of the vehicpe and container but also because it requires a ground control station and fuel handling, all of which has to be done by dedicated personell who cannot neccessrioy be fulfilling other combat duties, such as a MANPADS operator could. Furthermore this would be susceptable to jamming, whereas MANPADS are not. The Coyote 2 seems to be a much more practical solution to the issue of hitting quickly manouvering drones at a substantially lower cost.
Neat drone + missle tech great idea!
Amazing future Ai technology
I really appreciate your hard work and your amazing content can you do a video of mig 25 faxbat
Delta wing design so good but so underrated
Palmer Luckey is an Elon Musk type genius! I ❤ him!
This is not necessary. It's a recon drone used to hunt for targets. Upon not finding them, it returns to base.
It's similar to Lancet
Cool video. How about fuel amount need for get back to base after missing the target?
It will refuel midair…. Hahaha
Ukraine needs these for sure but know they won't get them
I enjoyed your video and I gave it a Thumbs Up
it should be called a drone rather missile
@@tahsinforbusinessenquirers8520 The terms are getting quite blurred in today's battle space. You could consider it a drone a cruise missile or a missile at this point the distinction is very blurred.
Nice video and we want T 14 armata or leopard2a8
We could say that the missile knows where it is... because it knows where it isn't
Thank you for this awesome tutorial,gonna do this at home 😍
(😂😂😂)
Joke aside thank you for this educational video ,absolutely awesome work 👏
Please make tutorials for students from any video you put ❤❤ who agreed me? Rise up your hand
Question?
Who invented the VTOL Vertical take off technology?
Are there patents on it?
Are there pivot points on the Vertical Take off?
How's the roadrunner against radar jammers?
What's the radar cross signature of the roadrunner?
What's the weight of the roadrunner?
What's the fuel source of the roadrunner?
What's the blast radius of the roadrunner?
I guess The Soviet made the first VTOL JET.
Another Question?
How does it go into vertical mode?
Is there a timer delay?
Are there pivot joints inside?@@Aitelly
Remove the weight first before flying , then you can aim and select what you think is the Best to dive and blast or to wait the target .
My way is perpetual flying missile and can rest in the air and can wait the target . In firing is speed of light . The enemy don't know it's coming is they already hit .
Very nice and smooth explanation 🤩
your content are great. I am a fan
It still too expensive even if the missile can be re-used, compare to $500 - 2,000 "suicide drone" for ground attack and it's too slow for surface to air combat since missile doesn't have a solid rocket motor (since it start from the ground, launch speed is 0 Mph), enemy fighter might overrun it.
There is something primally unnerving about an armed weapon that returns back to its base.
Another advantage of this system is that being sub sonic it EO systems can provide higher resolution imagery that make sit hard to jam or be tricked by flares vs a supersonic missile and even provide ID where the IR seekers are much less capable of doing so due to the need for small aperture and the air turbulence that arises from super sonic flight.
Also, these could be launched form most anywhere, even say from off shore wind farms which could extend air defenses over water.
Also, even if it is limited to Mach .9 that should enable a head on intercept or force a fighter to turn tail and run where the Roadrunner then could loiter to prevent it then turning back.
But that assumes the fighter knows it is there which it might pick it up on its radar or might not.
Also, if the Roadrunner engages aircraft on its way back home that aircraft might not have the luxury of turning away least it run out of fuel before it RTBs.
BTW, I am quite envious of your 3D animation skills and wish I could do that on my RUclips videos where I just make PowerPoint charts or hand draw stuff (and rather poorly at that).
Very innovative 😊
Do the tomahawk missile next
What does it do if it doesn't have enough fuel to get back home?
Go ask the missiles instead 😊
That's the neat part, it will not return
how is it reusable? once it is used it's poof gone
- So what, do you have such a rocket?
- I have such an idea, but think for yourself how to do it.
How are animations done... amazing
Are there reusable n'uk'Es.
please make the video how kornet e guided missile work how the missile penetration can change direction
I love you ❤ , love from 🇮🇳
One flaw here the rocket is 700kmh fast the su 57 1800kmh fast so no way she could get this airplane and catch up
It’s a beautiful weapon but I am thinking about what happen if it run out of fuel during interception does then it detonate itself to avoid collateral Damage
It deals emotional damage and walks away. That's how…
😂
So where is the fuel tank for the jet engines?? I see Delta wings, Jet Engines, VTOL landing legs.. but I am wondering where the engine gets it fuel to lift off and fly ..and the guidance.
In the wings we forgot to add those
Anduril, Flame of the west, bearer of hope. Tolkien's vibe intensifies
Most of their "innovation" are just Irani/Chinese weapon rip off. For example, this one is are just Geran-2 rip off.
Plz make a video on HAL LCH prachand
Crazy that it is 100k
Good innovations 🚀👍
Can you make a video about how do bomb dropped by air plane detonate like jdam and such.cuz I see vid where the bomb penetrate a house then it detonate unlike rpg or the hamas rocket that you made vid on
We will in our upcoming videos
So Shahed/Geran munition can land and wait for take backwards.
subsonic means that this is nowhere close to shooting down any aircraft, it looks more like a munition to use on tanks, trucks, building and maybe helicopters
the fighter jet can detect it and run away faster than the drone or shoot down the drone
Ideal for Helicopters. Slow moving, fragile, extremely expensive.
Innovative
Next gen Kamikaze drone...
i still don’t understand one basic thing is this refueled which kind of fuel does this use anyway all sound good but what has the tests shown coz personally I don’t think this can work on a Morden battle field which leaves the ordinary air defense systems more useful
So you’ve got a live missile coming home to roost?
next, chengdu j20 🤝🏼 😁
may work against low altitude slow target like helicopter, other targets only in optimal condition like head on
So it only saves money if it misses? I don't think that is the sort of saving military wants.
Big big savings is NO war!
@@alexyap7323But how would defence industries, generals and politicians enrich themselves?
@@alexyap7323Better to stick to attainable goals.
Hola, no entiendo como se puede reutilizar el dron si impacta y explota contra el objetivo.
AMRAAM is about a million, depending on variant
Good video. Can you make a video about how weaponized drones by Ukrainian forces work? Like how they arm the payload, how the drone release the bombs. It would be cool
Ok
Skies FOTO frightened Inter Nation
Important tracks
Is out
Greater america 😅😂❤❤
imagine a fighting between two of those
why they dont use any missile at the top of the rocket? only this missile can be fired and the engine could return safely.
Why would it need to land if it destroy it target along with itself? Second it don't have the same speed as the Hellfire or the AMRAAM missiles.
*Make a video on LCH Prachand.*
You're Awesome
Please make the Ghost also from Anduril
100k that is too much, can they ordered Pizza too while waiting the target, mine extra sauce please.
Wait, this drone is subsonic, right? Then why can't fighter speed up to mach 2?
It's too small and heavy beace of the extra fuel it need to land
@@Aitelly I meant why can't fighter jet just increase its speed and fly away from the Roadrunner?
**Shahed 136 has entered the chat**
good job
And it cost only three times over the ordinary missile 😅
what if it will explode to the base origin?
The weapon to surpass all metal gear
👏👏Technology NLO👽
nice. do the valkyrie drone
Attention! It returns! Run! Ruuuun!!!
Its more like a Kamikaze drone than a missile.
Can they order Pizza too while waiting the target...?
U R the best
I was waiting for a video today😂
Awesome of you Captain!
It's cheaper to arm existing drones with air to air missiles then this expensive autonomous fighter drone😂
Doesn't make sense an average cost of air to air missile unit cost 200000$ while this cost 100000$ or can even less
Dope !
Bro how anka 3 unmanned jet work
The jet is already blown up but it doesn’t know it yet…😂idk
Oh hooo,,, Now I know, who is your enemy 😕
Cool
Thanks
Excellent performance ❤❤❤
You have not mentioned about its fuel.
Great
If it's subsonic, how can it catch up to a mach 2 fighter jet from behind?
By the power of freedom and democracy.
It's possible by intercepting the trajectory of the jet (using AI I suppose?) that was travelling perpendicularly on a straight flight but unlikely, then and again non-western fighter pilots aren't well trained to know this. So a free kill I guess.
@@firstnamelastname1557 "Then again non-western fighters aren't well trained". There, there, that's why NATO never won against any determined opponent. Got ass whopped in Korean war, Vietnam war, and now getting decimated in Ukraine. And this shit mentality is how MICs can steal trillions on public money by selling shitty products.
What if it landed on enemy space