Valkyrie: This Autonomous AI Drone Could Be the Military’s Next Weapon | WSJ Equipped

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 2 авг 2024
  • The Valkyrie XQ-58A is a combat drone designed to deliver weapons or assist fighter jets - using artificial intelligence. The prototype has been in development for years and is able to travel 3,000 miles at an altitude of up to 45,000 ft. Experts now say this unmanned vehicle could play a role in a multi-billion-dollar U.S. military effort to use AI to expand its assets to keep up with increasingly advanced adversaries like China.
    WSJ looks at how the Valkyrie is built for stealth and how it could fit in the U.S. military’s plans to establish a fleet of AI systems.
    0:00 Valkyrie drones
    0:58 Specs
    4:50 Utility and cost
    6:57 Future development
    WSJ Equipped
    Equipped examines military innovation and tactics emerging around the world, breaking down the tech behind the weaponry and its potential impact.
    #Valkyrie #Weapons #WSJ

Комментарии • 573

  • @savagecub
    @savagecub 10 месяцев назад +306

    From just a purely engineering standpoint these types of weapons make a great deal of common sense. This is the future, like it or not. A drone is always going to be able to out G anything with a human onboard. Plus without the need for things like ejection seats, pressurization and environmental systems the drone is always going to be lighter, faster and more maneuverable as well as cheaper to build and maintain. Additionally when a drone gets shot down there’s no need to launch multiple men and equipment to conduct a search and recovery operation since there’s nothing to recover. It just makes so much more sense.

    • @MrMannyhw
      @MrMannyhw 10 месяцев назад +36

      Better have self destruct bomb on it to destroy itself if it get shot down.

    • @calokraine5901
      @calokraine5901 10 месяцев назад +4

      Another game changer 😂

    • @amazinkay4512
      @amazinkay4512 10 месяцев назад +5

      Yeah except you forget the lag of decision and maneuvering. A human cab make real tine decisions on their own. They know when to pull off and disengage. These systmes sre not a gane changer.

    • @savagecub
      @savagecub 10 месяцев назад +22

      @@amazinkay4512
      If one were to apply that logic then why would we ever use Cruise missiles ? Heck, why would we use any missiles ?

    • @MiddleAgedMillenial
      @MiddleAgedMillenial 10 месяцев назад +2

      We’ve had drones for like 10-15 years now tho? This is just the newest model. We really don’t need an iPhone upgrade drone each year.

  • @rickintexas1584
    @rickintexas1584 10 месяцев назад +347

    3,000 mile range, 1800 lbs of munitions, and under $10M, with low radar signature. What an awesome machine.

    • @deeppointturkiye2666
      @deeppointturkiye2666 10 месяцев назад +2

      😂😂😂😂😂😂

    • @kenmurray4005
      @kenmurray4005 10 месяцев назад

      Waste of money. Just like the F-35's that the USA refuses to give to Ukraine because the USA is afraid Russia might shoot one down. I'm sure China is aware of how scared the USA is to deploy these advanced systems. They'll be fine for air shows within the USA though.

    • @mikelbrenn111
      @mikelbrenn111 10 месяцев назад +30

      Correction, it will be $30 mil when it comes out for sale.

    • @LACHIVA1969
      @LACHIVA1969 10 месяцев назад +14

      Reduce the range to 700, miles, make it disposable, and reduce the price to 1 million and there goes the Kerch Bridge. Send 15 to 20 cheap rockets to get the Russian air defense crazy, or even firecrackers.

    • @Laminar-Flow
      @Laminar-Flow 10 месяцев назад +9

      @@Moskva-uf9bc *cheers for russia*

  • @ReconTheDon
    @ReconTheDon 10 месяцев назад +77

    I always think about the relative weight against grand pianos when guessing weight of large heavy objects.

    • @Michael4x
      @Michael4x 10 месяцев назад +1

      Well, at least they didn't use the weight of bananas per black hole.

    • @tonytaskforce3465
      @tonytaskforce3465 10 месяцев назад +6

      Yeah, I'm always out there comparing things to grand pianos. I'm glad it's not just me. 🤯

    • @jmorrison5206
      @jmorrison5206 9 месяцев назад +7

      Makes the Imperial System look downright levelheaded.

    • @gobimurugesan2411
      @gobimurugesan2411 3 месяца назад

      Maurican system

  • @slimerone
    @slimerone 10 месяцев назад +75

    if anything, the Valkyrie looks pretty badass lol

    • @Kenneth_James
      @Kenneth_James 10 месяцев назад +1

      Good name too

    • @duran9664
      @duran9664 9 месяцев назад

      But.. can’t be used on reality in most cases😒..like the Russian hypersonic missiles, expensive more advanced weapons limit targets. u only use them against extremely valuable target or it would be waste of money🤏

    • @CasualGuy60
      @CasualGuy60 9 месяцев назад

      I wonder when we will see or whether we will even see Marauder drones from the Division 2 game in real life

    • @navyseal1689
      @navyseal1689 9 месяцев назад +1

      ​@duran9664 this drone is disposable, send them to Chinese carrier fleet. It will sink all of em

  • @jobunaga4178
    @jobunaga4178 10 месяцев назад +130

    weighs about two or three concert grand pianos? riiight... because the average heft of concert grand pianos is common knowledge. can i get the weight of the valkyrie in units of washing machines? or how about in truck tires?

    • @waxinyomomma13
      @waxinyomomma13 10 месяцев назад +11

      I literally thought the same thing but why not say,"the weight of a small car,"Or "several plastic sporks?"

    • @leftwingersareweak
      @leftwingersareweak 10 месяцев назад +2

      Lol! How about it weighs about the equivalent of 50 Chinese spies?

    • @leftwingersareweak
      @leftwingersareweak 10 месяцев назад

      ​@waxinyomomma1375 quick, without doing a web search, what is the typical approximate weight of a small car? 😊

    • @waxinyomomma13
      @waxinyomomma13 10 месяцев назад

      @@leftwingersareweaklol 2500 lbs?

    • @waxinyomomma13
      @waxinyomomma13 10 месяцев назад

      The first "small car"suggestion was a better suggestion... the "sporks" for play play.

  • @BrandonMeyer1641
    @BrandonMeyer1641 9 месяцев назад +28

    This platform should be adopted. It is one of the most mature unmanned systems out. Kratos is a smaller player, but history tells us that can be a good thing with us government contracts.

    • @jonathanpfeffer3716
      @jonathanpfeffer3716 9 месяцев назад

      It absolutely will be, if not by the US then by someone else. It’s an amazing platform that fits literally perfectly into the Pacific theater’s strategic calculus.

    • @Propaneo-insaneo
      @Propaneo-insaneo 5 месяцев назад

      If your watching it on RUclips, it is probably in gen 3 at least

    • @GM-xk1nw
      @GM-xk1nw 4 месяца назад

      @@Propaneo-insaneo ok grandpa

  • @sams8502
    @sams8502 10 месяцев назад +30

    People just throw out the buzzword AI for everything. If he means autonomous flight and control, then he should just say that. People have been using machine learning since the 90s or even earlier.

    • @CaptainBrawnson
      @CaptainBrawnson 10 месяцев назад +2

      They're not referring to simple autonomous drones. They mean actual AI agents with decision making authority. Look up the Skyborg program and the recent test flights with AI agents flying real world F-16s in exercises.

    • @sams8502
      @sams8502 10 месяцев назад +11

      @@CaptainBrawnson My guy, AI agents and autonomous flight/control are literally the same thing. Nothing in AI is particularly novel, we've had perceptrons and regression algorithms for well over many decades. The use of "AI" for marketing is overblown, I can guarantee you that it's nowhere as intelligent as you think it is. The only thing novel is that they're actually willing to trust drones to be autonomous.

    • @everypitchcounts4875
      @everypitchcounts4875 9 месяцев назад

      General Dynamics X-62 VISTA. US has a fleet of AI piloted F-16s

  • @artcamp7
    @artcamp7 10 месяцев назад +53

    oh it weighs the same as 3 Grand Pianos? everyone knows how much that is. I'm glad they didn't compare it to other aircraft weights for instance

    • @GungaLaGunga
      @GungaLaGunga 10 месяцев назад +1

      lol I always love how journalists use comparisons that give absolutely no help to understanding whatever they are explaining. I always joke we should use one standard, the Little Smokie, for dimensions, weights, and volumes. Yes those little sausages. Example: That length is the same as Little Smokies stacked end to end going to the moon and back seven times. See. A perfectly comprehesible immediately understandable explaination.

    • @sagoamicably6486
      @sagoamicably6486 10 месяцев назад +1

      Or a compact car or something

    • @user-sx9dj4oi7t
      @user-sx9dj4oi7t 3 месяца назад

      🤖

  • @robertlamontagne5370
    @robertlamontagne5370 9 месяцев назад +9

    The fact that it doesn't need a run way either way is huge. Can bring air power to bear from anywhere!

  •  10 месяцев назад +26

    So everything that is autonomous is called AI now. Is my 10-year-old Roomba also AI now?

    • @portcybertryx222
      @portcybertryx222 9 месяцев назад +4

      Technically yeah. I mean perception and planning is an integral part of AI which is what the Roomba does so yeah that’s AI.

    •  9 месяцев назад +6

      @@dmeister98Or, AI is a buzzword that is so ambiguous that it effectively means nothing.

    • @stephengraham1153
      @stephengraham1153 9 месяцев назад +1

      @ It's just a computer program. Like all programs it can be broken down to millions of individual operations of input, process, output.

    • @kevinlow69420
      @kevinlow69420 9 месяцев назад

      Yes

  • @user-ec3nv8rh9l
    @user-ec3nv8rh9l 9 месяцев назад +21

    This is horrifying and fascinating at the same time. I believe that in nearest future more powerful military will be not even for the number of drones or other hardware but for more witted algorithms and AI systems on that hardware. And also it will be about clever orchestration of all that stuff.

  • @osamaalali2547
    @osamaalali2547 9 месяцев назад +9

    As a middle eastern, I can’t wait to be bummed by one of those. 😂
    Forget about human error, now we have to worry about Ai errors as well 😂

    • @junbug4997
      @junbug4997 Месяц назад

      Then start acting like a human being and stop terror attacks.

  • @JJs_playground
    @JJs_playground 9 месяцев назад +12

    This is both impressive and horrifying at the same time.

  • @asdasdasddgdgdfgdg
    @asdasdasddgdgdfgdg 10 месяцев назад +22

    The airframe looks very similar to the German-Spanish EADS Barracuda which had its first flight in 2003 or so. Barracuda was way ahead of its time.

    • @onyxfinger7431
      @onyxfinger7431 10 месяцев назад +1

      The airframe itself doesn't mean a ton.

    • @asdasdasddgdgdfgdg
      @asdasdasddgdgdfgdg 10 месяцев назад +6

      @@onyxfinger7431 true but back then, in the late 90s early 00s, EVERYONE designed drones completely differently. Drones looked either like Dassault Neutron or like Northrop Global Hawk. These were the two common layouts for jet Propeller UAVs or UCAVs. And now for the last years, everyone copies the Barracudas airframe, even Russia (Kronstadt Grom) and India (HAL CATS).

    • @asdasdasddgdgdfgdg
      @asdasdasddgdgdfgdg 10 месяцев назад +2

      *jet propelled, stupid autocorrect

    • @dianapennepacker6854
      @dianapennepacker6854 10 месяцев назад +2

      Sadly stealth means many future aircraft will look similar.
      This thing seems like a step backwards. It is so small, and so not a lot of internal space for either long stand off weapons or fuel.
      I would say it wouldn't be an issue if it will mean you get a ton more for the buck. Yet ha. Haha! Yeah that ain't happening.

    • @darkodonnie2729
      @darkodonnie2729 9 месяцев назад

      And what's surprising in that ?? Almost all of US weapons origin can be traced back to German engineering & their military Tech.

  • @Paul-we4ty
    @Paul-we4ty 10 месяцев назад +37

    "It's my time", said by Skynet.

    • @SHO1989
      @SHO1989 10 месяцев назад +6

      You beat me to this comment😂! First thing I thought watching this was Skynet is almost here. Anyone seen John Conner lately?

    • @tfkia356
      @tfkia356 10 месяцев назад +1

      The "AI" they're describing is a glorified flowchart. People need to stop mixing up Sci-fi and reality.

    • @fintech1378
      @fintech1378 10 месяцев назад +1

      Yea this is exactly how it plays out in the Terminator too

    • @arboghast8505
      @arboghast8505 9 месяцев назад

      "Eddy is the whole idea"

  • @drone51
    @drone51 9 месяцев назад +6

    I’m an aerospace engineering student designing autonomous drones that drop water bottles on targets. It is incredible how easily and rapidly college students can create these devices at very low cost with the technology available to the public. With the US’ defense spending and available technologies, it’s difficult to imagine what we have in our arsenal.

    • @MishaAmashukeli
      @MishaAmashukeli 9 месяцев назад

      How difficult and expensive would it be to make that watter bottle guided, so you you could drop it from 600 meters with high precision? A mini-JDAM basically. Asking for an Ukrainian friend :)

    • @drone51
      @drone51 9 месяцев назад

      @@MishaAmashukeli literally $10k it’s absurdly easy

    • @navyseal1689
      @navyseal1689 9 месяцев назад

      Yeah, it's just RC plane. So I never amazed when a country produces drone

    • @MishaAmashukeli
      @MishaAmashukeli 9 месяцев назад +1

      @@drone51 If fpv drones cost 400$, why does a glide bomb that needs no propulsion(just 4 control surfaces and actuators), no camera(let's assume it uses radio SACLOS guidance), and a much shorter comms range, cost so much more? Which parts are the most expensive? I'm not talking about R&D, just unit cost.

  • @Tortuex_
    @Tortuex_ 10 месяцев назад +6

    france signing that agreement not to use AI for military vehicles is going to keep it wayyyy back compared to other countries

  • @VVayVVard
    @VVayVVard 6 месяцев назад +2

    A big advantage for using AI for aircraft / ships is that the skies and seas tend to be far simpler, as environments, than land regions tend to be. The AI doesn't have to do nearly as much processing, and it's a lot more likely to make good decisions (especially against air-based/sea-based targets).

  • @imbw267
    @imbw267 10 месяцев назад +9

    Begun, the drone wars have...

    • @user-zp6dz9jw3g
      @user-zp6dz9jw3g 10 месяцев назад

      这些该死的军火商又需要钱,随便找个国家就说是他们的威胁。比如出现频率最多的中国,俄罗斯,伊朗……为什么?因为这些国家不听美国左右,想让自己家国民过的更幸福。华盛顿邮报是军火商和美国资本寡头的口舌

  • @hcf1956
    @hcf1956 9 месяцев назад +2

    Given the nature and mission requirements and capabilities no one drone (AI/or not), as well as keeping the cost low, there must be a "family" of drones for dedicated roles in the future fighter strike group. There will be "loyal wingman" to provide traditional "wingman" roles to protect the designated leaders of airstrike groups. As well as drones for ELINT warfare. As well as drones dedicated for attack rolls. The "loyal wingman" will require attributes of a modern stealth fighters to escort the manned fighters into any future battles.

  • @ProducerGio
    @ProducerGio 10 месяцев назад +11

    I want to be part of this. This is freakin awesome!

  • @nesseihtgnay9419
    @nesseihtgnay9419 9 месяцев назад +7

    The US are always the innovators, awesome job USA

    • @CC-bigig
      @CC-bigig Месяц назад

      the Germans definitely had this idea first with the V1 in WW2, though obviously technically was much more limited then

    • @Melior_Traiano
      @Melior_Traiano Месяц назад

      @@CC-bigig Yes, Germans innovated many of the military technologies we still use today, especially at the conceptual stage. But it took the United States in many cases to bring those technologies from the drawing board to reality. And the Germans of WWII also had no idea about software or about functioning AI.

  • @Kenneth_James
    @Kenneth_James 10 месяцев назад +5

    Valkyrie- Old Norse meaning: 'chooser of the slain' Perfect name

  • @williamdrijver4141
    @williamdrijver4141 9 месяцев назад +15

    Still primitive, but over time it will work. Clear to see the technical evolution. From stealth to drones, to stealthy drones, to AI controlled stealthy drones.

    • @DarthVader20201
      @DarthVader20201 8 месяцев назад +1

      And on its wat to Skynet 😅😅😅

    • @burtan2000
      @burtan2000 8 месяцев назад

      Think of how far we've come in 20 yrs. I believe it was the early days of Obama admin when they drones were strictly for surveillance and they had a confirmed sighting or location of Bin ladin, but were unable to take him out bc drones had no weapons and the target went underground before manned craft could get there.
      So they put weapons systems on them. Now we have drones of every shape, size, and use on the water in the air on the ground. Ukrainians taking out Russians with relatively cheap drones and grenades. Now Hamas is doing that too

    • @burtan2000
      @burtan2000 8 месяцев назад

      @@DarthVader20201We should remain thankful to Cameron for solidifying that concern in our collective consciousness. At EVERY step with AI and drone tech Skynet is mentioned (as it should be)
      But that was hardly the first rogue AI in fiction that killed people. Still it's the one we all mention. Not the Matrix sentinels or HAL from 2001.
      Turns out AI poses a very different threat. It's like TicToc - a threat to what's good in our society. Like how AI art is taking over and stealing artists' styles generating loads of mediocre stuff for pennies.

  • @shidohihiho
    @shidohihiho 6 месяцев назад +2

    I guess Army of Drone program from Ukraine side in the war has made a significant impact on the US military. It shows how the future WILL be shaped!

  • @indac-channel4995
    @indac-channel4995 10 месяцев назад +4

    looks like a deadly "Thunderbird "

  • @Erik-rp1hi
    @Erik-rp1hi 9 месяцев назад +1

    MCAS Miramar is where that hangar is. I was at that airshow and saw this display.

  • @jzisers
    @jzisers 10 месяцев назад +4

    Better armed, better tech, better range, cheaper than the Reaper drone

  • @gregfoulke8238
    @gregfoulke8238 9 месяцев назад +3

    This is the future for certain. Better start buying up all the Kratos shares you can!

  • @rv1251
    @rv1251 10 месяцев назад +1

    Seeing this bird you understand that vlad has no chances at all i mean zero😂

  • @ThouSirKingsly
    @ThouSirKingsly 10 месяцев назад +8

    Isn’t it better if we’re just throwing robots at robots? Like, in the future if the human is completely out of the equation, all war would be is throwing metal at metal and seeing which one wins.

    • @mmaranta785
      @mmaranta785 10 месяцев назад

      And then recycling of course.

    • @mill2712
      @mill2712 9 месяцев назад +2

      ​@@mmaranta785
      Not entirely. In order to win you'd still need to target fuel depots, drone manufacturing centers and command staff.
      While this could reduce the amount of people who perish, people will still die.

    • @dinte215
      @dinte215 9 месяцев назад

      Lol. No, those drones are going to kill people just like the current ones.

  • @jloiben12
    @jloiben12 10 месяцев назад +6

    It should get some… live action tests in Ukraine. Send them 50 of those a year. It is not expensive for its capabilities and will help from a program-perspective

    • @adamsojka3345
      @adamsojka3345 10 месяцев назад +1

      I bet the thought has occured to them, the reason for many arms companies not doing so is a mystery to me.

    • @Skymenace
      @Skymenace 10 месяцев назад +2

      First of all it's not ready to be deployed yet. But the answer is obvious to your question. The Russians will do everything to strike one down and recover its pieces and eventually, they will manage to do so, then you have lost years of technological development. Billions of dollars spent on technological advantage will be gone in a matter of months if not days...

  • @gtgodbear6320
    @gtgodbear6320 9 месяцев назад +2

    You need 2-3 to trail every jet. You can make some very cheap ones to draw missiles away from Jets as decoys. At the last seconds they can do high-g maneuvers that could escape the rockets. Then automatically catch up to the US jet.

  • @First1ToComment
    @First1ToComment 10 месяцев назад +2

    Can't we all just get along ?

  • @eddies6977
    @eddies6977 8 месяцев назад +2

    AI can't even write a decent research paper, making life and death decisions with 1800 lbs of ordinance on board doesn't give me warm feelings of safety. Instead, I get that, we're really going down that road feeling.😮

  • @pauldannelachica2388
    @pauldannelachica2388 10 месяцев назад +2

    Very cool they should add a modular infrastructure

  • @paulcohen6727
    @paulcohen6727 9 месяцев назад +3

    I hope it has a self-destruct mechanism to prevent it's secret technology from getting into the wrong hands in case it malfunctions and is recovered by the enemy.

    • @dolanpls3330
      @dolanpls3330 2 месяца назад

      I doubt that's an oversight, it likely would have something designed to serve that purpose

  • @coldfinger459sub0
    @coldfinger459sub0 10 месяцев назад +3

    Within the first fraction of a second when I seen that on the launchpad.
    I thought World War II Germany, the V2 rocket.

  • @shionuzuki5549
    @shionuzuki5549 10 месяцев назад +3

    Escalate? I would assume you would only deploy this in a war situation. Escalation is the last thing you would care about. Neutralizing your enemies would be top priority.

  • @novavortex7763
    @novavortex7763 10 месяцев назад +7

    Love the design its so sleek!

  • @larryfloyd5111
    @larryfloyd5111 9 месяцев назад +3

    "...we chose to act in a way that conforms with our values..."

  • @aposteriori421
    @aposteriori421 10 месяцев назад

    pretty awesome!

  • @Shadinsb
    @Shadinsb 9 месяцев назад +1

    "Let's do that!!"
    - DoD after watching The Terminator

  • @stevenkidd6761
    @stevenkidd6761 10 месяцев назад +5

    So it weighs between 20 to 30 washing machines?

    • @JT-hx8xr
      @JT-hx8xr 5 месяцев назад

      What does that equal in microwaves?

    • @stevenkidd6761
      @stevenkidd6761 5 месяцев назад

      @@JT-hx8xr industrial or dorm sized?
      97.8 (+/- 2.7 ) for regular home microwaves...

  • @ricksherman34
    @ricksherman34 9 месяцев назад +1

    All the missiles need to be painted with Winnie The Pooh on their sides 😆

  • @ristube3319
    @ristube3319 8 месяцев назад +1

    These should really be equipped with that new military laser.

  • @florenceemathrix
    @florenceemathrix Месяц назад

    First, I want to commend The Wall Street Journal for producing such an insightful video on the Valkyrie drone. This content highlights a crucial and rapidly evolving area of military technology that is increasingly relevant in today’s geopolitical landscape. The Valkyrie drone exemplifies the growing integration of artificial intelligence into military applications, a trend that aligns with my own views on the future of warfare. This development signifies a major shift in how military operations are conducted, with AI-driven systems playing an ever more significant role. However, this advancement also underscores a critical concern: the potential for an AI arms race. As the video points out, the U.S. is expanding its drone arsenal to keep pace with countries like China, which has been significantly bolstering its military capabilities. This reciprocal escalation could lead to a scenario where AI technologies are pitted against each other in warfare, which might result in unpredictable and possibly catastrophic outcomes. The autonomous nature of these AI systems raises serious ethical and safety issues. Decisions made by AI, especially in life-and-death situations, pose profound questions about accountability and control. While AI can enhance operational efficiency and effectiveness, there is a significant risk if these systems malfunction or are misused. It is imperative that we approach the deployment of AI in military contexts with extreme caution. International regulations and collaborative frameworks are needed to ensure these technologies are used responsibly and ethically. Fostering dialogue among nations to establish norms and agreements is crucial to preventing an uncontrollable arms race and ensuring global security. In summary, while the Valkyrie drone represents a leap forward in military technology, it also brings to light the urgent need for thoughtful regulation and international cooperation to mitigate the risks associated with AI in warfare.

  • @user-bm5ht8ze2t
    @user-bm5ht8ze2t 10 месяцев назад +1

    hmmm. Only thing it lacks is Skynet. We're getting there.

  • @David-wc5zl
    @David-wc5zl 9 месяцев назад +1

    WSJ: why so much debt? Also WSJ: We Love Defense Spending!

  • @carloshour8263
    @carloshour8263 10 месяцев назад +3

    Everyone cheers while we start building the terminator air force. This is the beginning of the end, friends

  • @vitaliyvyntu4566
    @vitaliyvyntu4566 5 месяцев назад

    Thank you

  • @dwapo
    @dwapo 6 месяцев назад +1

    Please, could you provide weight measurements on a full-size fridge scale next time as I'm unfamiliar with grand piano metrics.

  • @ebadd3468
    @ebadd3468 9 месяцев назад +1

    Aaaahhh! The US military industrial complex, I smell victory!

  • @jmorrison5206
    @jmorrison5206 9 месяцев назад +1

    You want SkyNet and Terminators? ‘Cause this is how you get SkyNet and Terminators.

  • @Broken_dish
    @Broken_dish 10 месяцев назад +7

    its kinda funny how they mentioned the price oh its alot cheaper than a manned jet...i can guarantee they are still ripping off the gov its so overpriced im sure compared to if the french or gb or ukraine made the same thing

    • @CalvinK-the_old_fogey
      @CalvinK-the_old_fogey 10 месяцев назад

      And using China as bogeyman to squeeze every last drop of funding. Previously it was Russia or USSR. I bet it’s going to be India or Brazil in the future. 😂

  • @skip123davis
    @skip123davis 9 месяцев назад +2

    well the problem is that the tech is moving faster than the decision makers.

  • @wildweasel3001
    @wildweasel3001 9 месяцев назад +1

    MORE drones!!! 🎉

  • @alexomar9168
    @alexomar9168 10 месяцев назад +7

    For the cost of one F35 you can have 15 of these valkyries. In a straight up dogfight the F35 could probably win a 15 vs 1 but the valks are replaceable and the F35 is not.

    • @yarmgl1613
      @yarmgl1613 9 месяцев назад

      these drones are bombers/strike aircraft, not fighters

    • @alexomar9168
      @alexomar9168 9 месяцев назад

      @@yarmgl1613 ahh okay I may have misunderstood. I assume the point stands, that an unmanned fighter would be similarly cheap, but yeah I don't actually know.

  • @s.j.j3598
    @s.j.j3598 9 месяцев назад +1

    What a well spoken guy

  • @prithvirajsrinivasan1077
    @prithvirajsrinivasan1077 9 месяцев назад +4

    It's crazy to think that defence systems in the near future will also have the touch of AI. Sounds fascinating but risky too given that the program needs more tweaks . But so far this tech looks really good.

  • @FransiscoArmendariz-zj8vu
    @FransiscoArmendariz-zj8vu 10 месяцев назад

    Gradius

  • @thisiskaos9249
    @thisiskaos9249 10 месяцев назад +1

    Our values! The US has values! Wow!

  • @mabroukatis
    @mabroukatis 10 месяцев назад +3

    Skynet origin story. Note my words!

  • @duran9664
    @duran9664 9 месяцев назад +1

    US needs to focus on extremely cheap weapons 🤏

  • @epicsnake21
    @epicsnake21 10 месяцев назад +1

    Oh Look, A Civilian Airliner

  • @vectorfox4782
    @vectorfox4782 9 месяцев назад +1

    It would be much more financially feasible to mass produce these instead of an expensive aircraft like the F-35.

  • @hder8740
    @hder8740 9 месяцев назад

    The thunderbird five model springs to mind. Didn’t see any nylon threads throw.

    • @stephengraham1153
      @stephengraham1153 9 месяцев назад

      Hmmm... Thunderbird five was the orbital space station. I think you are confusing it with thunderbird 2.

  • @khanhhien06
    @khanhhien06 10 месяцев назад +1

    How does it land?

  • @MrMannyhw
    @MrMannyhw 10 месяцев назад +2

    Here comes skynet :D

  • @28704joe
    @28704joe 10 месяцев назад +8

    How do they recover this drone ?

    • @staticoverplastic7456
      @staticoverplastic7456 10 месяцев назад +2

      parachute

    • @electron6825
      @electron6825 10 месяцев назад

      It dives into the nearest crowd

    • @Nainara32
      @Nainara32 10 месяцев назад +1

      That's a good question. Can it land on a carrier, or does it need an airfield with a long runway?

    • @radustana
      @radustana 3 месяца назад

      Drones can already land themselves just fine

    • @28704joe
      @28704joe 3 месяца назад +1

      @@radustana Too bad the video didn't show the Valkyrie landing.

  • @Av-vd3wk
    @Av-vd3wk 9 месяцев назад +1

    Pffft only 1800 pounds of bombs? Not even a single 2,000 lb bomb?

  • @joshmiriento4466
    @joshmiriento4466 10 месяцев назад +1

    Curved shape is the last thing you want when designing a stealth aircraft. Curved shapes reflect radar signals more readily than flat or angular shapes. Please correct this.

    • @geogmz8277
      @geogmz8277 10 месяцев назад

      I was thinking the same when she said it...
      "if round/curve is what you want, why do all stealth fighters look like someone went crazy with a triangular ruler?"

  • @Kangroo11
    @Kangroo11 10 месяцев назад +10

    skynet be like , its about time

  • @user-td8ls5mn5q
    @user-td8ls5mn5q 10 месяцев назад +2

    Modern manned aircraft should be designed only to be super stealthy and fast and have enough computing power to control and be the satalight datalink to pass info and control AI autonomous aircraft, so all manned aircraft should forget about having the need to be manoeuverable as it’s no longer needed in the modern battle space, plus new missiles should be the only thing that needs to be able and designed to out manoeuvre enemy aircraft and kill them at extreme distances

    • @fuzfire
      @fuzfire 10 месяцев назад +1

      After what Elon Musk did to Ukraine in shutting down his starlink satellites I'd be very careful about giving him access to any military capabilities for The US. Yes I know he has done a lot of good things but this behavior is very concerning at least to me as he may pivot on a whim and cause grave harm to an operation if he doesn't like what's going down. JMHO!

    • @Dan-lg2by
      @Dan-lg2by 8 месяцев назад

      That's exactly what the air force NGAD and navy F/A/XX 6th gen fighter programs are making

  • @emoneytrain
    @emoneytrain 10 месяцев назад +3

    What's the error rate of piloted planes? What is the basis for assuming autonomous drones will have higher error rates than piloted planes?

    • @carloshour8263
      @carloshour8263 10 месяцев назад

      Simply inexperience. Once AI learns to override the human fail safes, we'll see how good they are. It will also be the last thing we see

    • @emoneytrain
      @emoneytrain 9 месяцев назад

      @@carloshour8263 Fair, although I imagine the models behind the AI pilots are trained on historical data (every combat flight in history, potentially) and against other human-controlled agents in simulation.

    • @stephengraham1153
      @stephengraham1153 9 месяцев назад

      @@emoneytrainchips can fail and so can software so I hope the manufacturers have built in enough redundancy to accommodate combat situations.

  • @darrencorrigan8505
    @darrencorrigan8505 9 месяцев назад

    Thanks, Wall Street Journal.

  • @MrZgui415
    @MrZgui415 3 месяца назад

    Gotta prep for Drone wars 😮

  • @Ludens93
    @Ludens93 Месяц назад

    If only the US military spent as much R&D in deescalation tech like forcefields as they do this tech that's violent. Something like a forcefield as a defensive strategy would render all forms of way meaningless, but these weapons just keep that spiral of war going without end.

  • @EricLian
    @EricLian 10 месяцев назад

    When the video first started, I thought I was watching Thunderbird 2. 😆

  • @rekria7037
    @rekria7037 6 месяцев назад +1

    Skynet has entered the building.

  • @bambamyong
    @bambamyong 10 месяцев назад +1

    Need a sky full of million of AI drones 🫡 swarm of small, to large drones

  • @trevorsutherland5263
    @trevorsutherland5263 9 месяцев назад +2

    Russian Sukhoi-70 Okhotnik stealth drone has 6000 mile range and 4500 lb. capacity, and prototypes already spotted over Ukraine. Outperforms Valkyrie at half the cost.....which we now see is typical of all Russian weapons vs. their Western equivalent

    • @stephengraham1153
      @stephengraham1153 9 месяцев назад +2

      With one big difference. Western equivalents tend to be more reliable.

  • @TrevorNet
    @TrevorNet 9 месяцев назад

    China’s entire fleet of drones will respond to _”Hey Siri…”._

  • @yashdwivedi8057
    @yashdwivedi8057 10 месяцев назад +1

    Skynet is live!!!!!!

  • @markalbert9390
    @markalbert9390 10 месяцев назад +3

    Does a 3,000 mile range mean out and back, or, because it’s a drone, does that mean just “out”. 3,000 both ways is giant…even in the Pacific.

    • @flyingyakdeath
      @flyingyakdeath 9 месяцев назад +1

      Range is range. Standard aviation term for 100 years.

    • @jonathanpfeffer3716
      @jonathanpfeffer3716 9 месяцев назад +2

      Just out. Combat radius is both ways.

    • @LeonAust
      @LeonAust 9 месяцев назад

      Some drones are not designed to return and others are designed to return, therefore it depends on the drone.

  • @XA1985
    @XA1985 10 месяцев назад +1

    When we develop the first AI fighter jet is all over 😂

  • @adamkong4010
    @adamkong4010 6 месяцев назад +1

    War isn't key to solve problems in the world.

  • @duran9664
    @duran9664 9 месяцев назад +1

    ⚠️But.. can’t be used in reality in most cases as it always needs valuable targets😒 US military main goal seems to enrich their contractors first instead of practical & logical solutions.

  • @Jacob-W-5570
    @Jacob-W-5570 9 месяцев назад

    nobody of the filming team thought to tell that guy in the suit behind the table, that it's incredably rude and offencise to sit with your hands under the table like that?

  • @mariacheebandidos7183
    @mariacheebandidos7183 10 месяцев назад +1

    0:28 do people really need to talk up or overhype the capabilities of potential adversaries to justify the US making advancement in these fields?

  • @armuk
    @armuk 4 месяца назад +1

    what better laboratory than the bloodsoaked battlefield

  • @falloutmule
    @falloutmule 10 месяцев назад +1

    We're doing Skynet lol

  • @harrymu148
    @harrymu148 9 месяцев назад +2

    Keep in mind that a lot of this is also because we don't have the recruitment to fill those seats. If you have more pilots, you'll statistically have more aces, and more aces means lesser reliance on technology. it might be a little bit anachronistic but it's all about what you use to fill the meter called "combat effectiveness"

    • @jonathanpfeffer3716
      @jonathanpfeffer3716 9 месяцев назад

      Not really true. All these platforms come with significant personnel requirements due to maintenance. Any single aircraft only needs one pilot, but will need many more maintainers. Cutting out the pilot makes a pretty small difference in personnel requirements.
      The real value with these platforms is their attritable nature.

  • @justinddunlap
    @justinddunlap 9 месяцев назад

    Dude at 1:00 sounds like Hank Hill. Not that that's bad.

  • @Sillybutts
    @Sillybutts 10 месяцев назад +3

    Terrifying

  • @robertcalamusso1603
    @robertcalamusso1603 9 месяцев назад

    Peace through Strength
    🦬🌀🇺🇸

  • @TaskSwitcherify
    @TaskSwitcherify 10 месяцев назад +4

    Could we perhaps try to not have adversaries?

  • @GrimJerr
    @GrimJerr 9 месяцев назад

    The 🤨pentagon has been watching my Kerbal builds 😆😆😆

  • @indominusbytecomputadoras2470
    @indominusbytecomputadoras2470 9 месяцев назад

    Someone has to pay rights to gerry anderson. For a moment i thought that it was the Thunderbird 2.

  • @Ray-md9nr
    @Ray-md9nr 10 месяцев назад +1

    Interesting that you would use pianos as a unit of measurement. You could use Metric, you know, DARPA, NASA, and other organizations alike use it.

    • @thafunktapus
      @thafunktapus 9 месяцев назад

      they could use imperial as well. everybody knows what a ton is

    • @stephengraham1153
      @stephengraham1153 9 месяцев назад

      @@thafunktapus Except that a metric ton is 1,000kg (2,204.6 pounds), The short ton used in the US is 2,000 pounds and the imperial ton is 2,240 pounds. Which one is it that you think that everybody knows?