I have both. I now known my flat feet are so happy in these shoes. I have a black men's GT 2000 9 (2E extra wide) and a women's GT 1000 10 (normal width). I love walking or cycling in them. I don't run anymore. I was so happy when I could finally get a 2E version in Australia because my feet are so wide, they would always blow out the side of the shoe over time. In a post COVID world, I wear either one of these on an every day basis at work as a teacher. Both do a good job. I wear the black ones when I'm teaching laboratory skills or have a risk of getting dirty. My GT 1000 were bought purely because they came in a pretty limited edition colour. I wear them when I'm wearing colourful clothes or when I don't have to worry about them getting dirty. I do notice that they are a little stiffer but not something that worries me. I like both to work out in. I do HIIT, spin and weights in either. I prefer the GT 2000 overall in terms of fit because they are the right width for me.
Eleanor! Glad to see a fellow teacher here on the page, I teach Science as well. I am glad to hear you have been such a fan of the GTs. I am normally a KAYANO kind of guy and am still rocking with my 25's and 26's. However, with school returning back to in class soon, maybe now will be the perfect time to give the new GT-2000's a try! I too also use these primarily more for walking or exercise over running. Stay safe and healthy my friend:)
@@kickinit7018 I just realised, I have the 4E width, not the 2E in the men's GT 2000. Also, I get the GTs because I also have a tendency to roll my ankle in an outwards motion on top of having flat feet and wear orthotics. I need the stability provided by the GTs. I don't remember if the Kayanos are neutral or are designed for a supination or pronation, but it is why I wear the GTs.
@@eleanorchan872 The Kayano's are built very similarly to the GT's just a different feel more so! I've tried a couple of GTs in the past and was a huge fan of the cushioning, it was always so soft. Glad to see somebody taking advantage of the wide widths! I remember when I worked in retail many people being so thankful that Asics actually sold the same shoe simply in a wider width as they would check store after store and couldn't find something!
@@kickinit7018 hmm I might go try a Kayano to see how they feel in the future. Are they good for someone with flat feet and who rolls their ankles outwards if I'm not careful?
I picked up a pair of Asics in Tokyo Station on holiday this summer after developing pain in, well basically it felt like ALL the bones in my foot. My knees were not good either. That is because I was carrying a backpack on concrete for up to 12 hours a day in Converse. Stupid. I have no idea what model of Asics they were. I think they were a JDM model. But it spurred me on to investigate this kind of shoe. So I bought a Kayano 31 in Harajuka...and then left the first shoes I bought behind as I left the city! Really unhappy about that. So far I have 3 pairs of Asics. :-) I have been amazed at the level of knowledge and support that is available on this subject. Thanks to everyone for education an old fogie like me. 👍
Your enthusiasm got me! I've subscribed! I'm a newbie, inconsistent runner, trying to get it together this year. Brooks Glycerin were my first and I'm currently loving the pillowyness of the Saucony ISO 2 (love love love). I tried on a pair of Asics Noosa some time ago (purely for the aesthetics) and loved the fit, but did not purchase because someone recommended the Nimbus and then the GT-1000 and then the 2000... sooo... was super confused until I came upon your videos! Thanks a bunch!!!
Thank you for the support Sinclair! With all the time off this is the perfect year to do it. Glad to hear that the Brooks and Saucony have worked well, I have been meaning to give a pair of Saucony's a shot. Maybe I'll give the ISO a try one of these days! Tell me about it, I do not have a pair of the Noosa's because the Gel-Kayano works so well for me (basically a souped up GT-2000), but I want one so bad because the new colours on the Noosa TRI-12 are amazing. No problem at all my friend, if you have any other questions feel free to let me know!
Great video. For me price has a significant influence. I was able to pick up the GT 1000 9 for £53, while the GT 2000 were around £100. The GT 2000 may be a better shoe, but not twice as good as the GT 1000.
The moment I typed the shoe I want to wear Jordan is the first to video and he just answered my Question .. Thanks Brother keep up the great work and you got new follower
Man, such an informative channel. it deserves m uch more subscribers. could you please do a review on the GT-4000? Also in comparison to the GT-1000? PLEASE! Would be much appreciated. I am not sure which to buy. If you could also compare the GT-4000 and GT-1000 to the Gel-Kayano 28, you would help me a lot! Thanks a lot!
Rajesh my friend! Thank you for the support, unfortunately I cannot review the GT-4000 only because I have no idea what it feels like and it is not available here in Canada :( If it arrives though I will definitely head to the store and let you know!
@@kickinit7018 I see. But could you do a comparison of GT-1000 and Gel Kayano 28 please? Would be much appreciated. The GT-1000 is the "entry level" shoe, the Gel Kayano is considered to be Asics "top shoe". But what does that mean? Is the GT-1000 not as good? Or different?
@@RajeshGupta-hs1nx Hey Rajeh, specifically the GT-1000 is not built as premium as the Kayano. What that means is that it lacks in many of the aspects the Kayano has, the big one being cushioning. The Kayano has a very plush forefoot and great cushion in the heel, whereas a GT-1000 because it is an entry model it will have a lot less of that oh so glorious gel-cushioning. As a result, it tends to not be as comfortable. However, that does not mean it is a bad shoe, I have had people try on the GT-1000 and like it over the Gel-Kayano simply because how it gripped their foot type and shape better. So many of these things can be subjective if you know what I am saying.
Hey Himashu, I am excited to hear about your Infinity Jin. It looks beautiful! This shoe is a performance runner and can be used primarily for running activities. It is actually based/inspired from a previously beloved Asics runner known as the "Gel-Kinsei" which they discontinued (I don't know why it was excellent). Asics usually doesn't recommend you use running shoes like this for the gym (i.e. weightlifting, lateral movements etc) as they do not have lateral support in them. They would prefer you buy low to the ground Asics gym specific shoes. However, if I am being honest, I very often use my Asics runners while working out in the gym and find them more than fine! I hope this helped :).
Nice video 👍👍. Thanks for clearing the doubt. I am GT 1000 8 user, last year when i bought it i tried both 1000 & 2000 and i found 1000 was fiting to my foot and was more comfortable in terms of sizing. Whereas 2000 was more broad and foot was not fitting in properly. I am not saying the fitting should be tight but there should just right amount of breathing/expansion space for your foot. And in gt 2000 i found the space was either way more adequate for my size or if downsized it was way to less. No wonder why 1000 is mostly out of stock in india
Hey Saurabh, thanks a ton for your input! See, that right there is a perfect example of how the value of a shoe isn't always reflected in price. The GT-2000 might be a bit more expensive, but the GT-1000 is still great and even better for some people such as yourself 👍. I hope they turned out great, let me know what colour you got!
Hey Subhasish, There is not going to be much of a difference in comfort or durability between the GT-2000 7 and GT-2000 8. This is because since these are the same model shoe, just different year, Asics does not want to change it too much as many people want to get the same shoe again each year. The one thing that they do change is fit though, so one might be more comfortable simply because it fits better. However, if we are talking about the cushioning in the shoe they will simply be the same between the 2000-7 and 2000-8. As for the 1000 vs either the GT-2000 7 or GT-2000 8, I would go with either of the 2000's. These shoes are built with a bit more structural support than the GT-1000. Since there is more support, this means that it will take longer to break that support down, therefore lasting you longer and being a more durable shoe! Hope that helped, if you have any other questions let me know 🙏
Awesome videos man. I own the lovely Keyanos for walking/running but am looking for a daily shoe for work (teacher). Should I still go fancy with the Keyanos or will the GT line suffice? Thanks in advance
Hey Christopher! Glad to see a fellow teacher in the comments my friend! Offfff that is a tough one. I actually prefer the Gel-Kayano's for physical activity, me personally. I have owned the 23, 24, 25 and 26's and they have always done me well. However, I think the GT-2000 might be a bit better for work in the sense that they have a softer mid sole. The Gel-Kayano is typically stiffer in the mid sole, the GT-2000 is a bit more forgiving here and is just as if not more comfortable FOR LESS MONEY. I notice that the Kayano's with that stiff midsole can have your feet hurting if you are standing in one place or just doing general pacing around here and there. So if you are on your feet all day, particularly not moving or doing anything to physically active just regular walking around the classroom, I think the GT-2000's would be perfect. MY ONE EXCEPETION TO THIS ADVICE: If you are a Phys-Ed teacher (which I would be very jealous of haha), than I would stick with the Kayano's as you already know these always pull through for you when walking or running. Hope that helps, let me know if you have any other questions:)
@@kickinit7018 thanks for the awesome reply! Looks like I will definitely look into the GT-2000s then. I work with younger children so i do tend to move around a bit more but definitely not as much as a phys ed teacher! Thanks again
Decent didnt mention stability and spineshenks differences. Im obsessed with this shoe. Explain heel trail editions and knit. 2008 and b4 have better durability esp at toe top if you have toenials. Glue seperates premature post netting and foam molds gt 2000 3ish above
Honestly my friend the answer to that question changes each year. Asics fiddles around with the sizing of their models each year. So for example, the Gel-Kayano 23 was very narrow, but the next year I bought the Kayano 24 it was significantly wider. Last time I sold a pair of GT-1000's they had a significantly wider toe box than the 2000, but things definitely may have changed since then!
Thanks for the review. I just bought the gt-2000 yesterday and after a 15K training I found its stability truly amazing. I felt the insole is harder than my old wave rider 20 (I've been a rider fan over ten years) while trying on in store, quite worried at first. The shoes keeps my foot moving forward, easy to speed up. Now I get more interested in Asics. Mizuno now comes with a lot of series with tongue stitched, which make me feel uncomfortable with my high instep. Fortunately Asics keeps it separated. I'm nearly flatfoot, do u think the gt-1000 is adequate for the 15~18K road training? Or any Asics series model recommended? Thank you~
Hello my friend, the GT-1000 will be suitable to provide the support you need. However, it will not have the gel-cushioning that you might need for that distance. It depends on you, I know me personally I could not do that distance without the comfort of more gel, and that is what you get with the GT-2000 over the GT-1000. I preferably ALWAYS go with the Gel-Kayano, it is a fantastic shoe. The midsole is stiffer than the GT-2000 but the structural support is sensational. I would say stick GT-2000 or get one of last years models of the Kayano on a discount, they don't change much from year to year besides fit!
Hey, I ran last season in GT-2000 and it is the best shoe I had so far (pronator) but, as I am going below 4:30 I feel it is not hmm... responsive enough to make that pace feel good. Should I go for GT-1000 for less cushioning (and better feeling) or you recommend something different?
Hmmm Marek, that is a tough one. The GT-2000 is an excellent shoe. The GT-1000 will not necessarily fit your foot better. It could, but you need to try it on in person in order to see (which you may not be able to depending on the area you live and COVID)! At the same time, I do not think the GT-1000 will provide as much responsiveness as the GT-2000. It may be similar or just a bit short, if you are looking for more responsiveness I would go with the Gel-Kayano! It is the shoe I use as a pronator and has been my go to Asics for years. I currently own the 23, 24, 25 and 26's! Let me know if you have any questions about it!
@@kickinit7018 Thanks for your answer. If I can have another one, is there a starting stability shoe or pronator shoe. Something lighter that could be taken for competitions?
@@marekstepien5450 Sure my friend. The GT-1000 would be a good beginner pronator, but it is not necessarily light. If you are looking to use it for a competition, and want it to be on the lighter side - The Gel-Noosa Tri would be amazing. Be aware though, Asics overpronation support is called "Duomax". Asics use to regularly have Duomax in the Gel-Noosa Tri, then they took it away, then they brought it back, and then this year they have taken it away again. Hence, the Gel-Noosa Tri 13 from this year does not have Duomax. However, on their website they still have many last year models of the Gel- Noosa Tri 12, which did have that Duomax overpronation support. This would be super lightweight! I have a video on it on my channel if you'd like more information: ruclips.net/video/usigh5ocrBA/видео.html&ab_channel=KickinIt
I've been wearing the GT 2000 model for many years. I have supination that causes the outer heels of my soles to wear down. Is this model a good choice for foot supination? Thank you.
Hello Kimberly, this shoe is built more so for people who overpronate. So technically speaking it is not built for people whose arches roll outwards (Supination) but more so whose arches roll in (Pronation). However, this does not mean it is necessarily bad for you. Although it may not be correcting your Supination issue, because it is built for overpronaters it has a lot of extra support built in, which is beneficial for you! How has it felt over the last several years, has it worked?
@@grrrbrrr9053 check em out. Belgian designer and has penned some beautiful collaborations with ASICS. Now he is the creative director of the ASICS Sportstyle line. He’s recently revitalized the Gel Kayano 14
I was never able to try the in between models as here in Canada we've only had the 1000 and 2000 the last several years. Would you say the 2160 was better than the 2000?
Hi there Kai, Sorry for the delay! Unfortunately as of now I will not be reviewing Novablast as my go to light weight shoe is the Dynaflyte and I already have a pair stocked up. However, if I swing by Asics and they feel absolutely incredible I will definitely pick them up then. I shall keep you posted if things change. Kayano Lite as in LITEshow or do you mean an altered version like the Nimbus Lite? The Kayano is my go to shoe so that would be amazing:o!
Kickin It I see. I’m still interested to see your review of dynablast as well :D. Btw, I meant Kayano Lite as in same VER of Nimbus lite, and I heard they will be available in Oct 1st
@@kaishunider4110 Haha if I get them or even give them a try on, I will definitely do a video on it my friend:) Also, that is amazing I did not know that about the Kayano Lite. I hope that means they might be more lightweight. I love the Kayano, and it is my favourite shoe, but the one draw back is all that structural support adds weight you know. Fingers crossed!
Hey my friends, I have never worn the NB Freshfoam. However, what I can say is that if you are a overpronator or flatfooted, the GT-1000 will do great in providing you with the support that you need. I would try them in store to be sure. Let me know if you have anymore questions!
Both will do your feet good my friend, it depends more so on how much gel-cushioning you want. If you need a softer shoe to be comfortable, go with the GT-2000. If you don't necessarily need the shoe to be nice and soft and want to save some money, the GT-1000 will do you well!
@@vadapallysuraj8263 Hello Vadapally, unfortunately I am not too familiar with the GT-4000 as we don't have them in Canada. To know if it really helps with flat feet, you must check to make sure it has Duomax. Honestly, 1000, 2000, 4000, if any of them have duomax they will serve to be fine in protecting you against overpronation!
You read my mind my friend! I am actually going to be putting out a video on this very soon! Honestly though, the short answer is there is very minimal difference between the two. Both offer a high level of support and excellent cushion, they are more so different simply in fit. The GT-2000 typically has less stiff of a midsole too. It also comes at a cheaper price tag! :) Let me know if you have any other questions.
Hey Arindam! It depends more so on your personal preferences. Nike shoes will be more minimal, which makes them lighter weight and that is a fantastic feeling. At the same time though, Nike shoes typically won't have as much cushion or specifically support as these Asics shoes do. This allows the Asics to feel very nice and comfy but just a tad bit heavier. If you appreciate cushion and support, go Asics. If you want something more lightweight and minimal, go Nike. Let me know if you have any other questions :)
@@arindamchatterjee8522 If you are having pain in your knees, I would go for an Asics shoe that has a lot of support. The cushion and support is going to help take the pressure off your knees. I would go with the GT-2000 or the Gel-Kayano! I have a tear in my left ACL and suffered from knee pains and the Kayano did wonders for me. The latest Gel-Kayano 28 is full price right now, but you can find plenty of last years models (Gel-Kayano 27) for cheap at places like Running Room, Sportscheck etc :) Let me know if you have any other questions!
@@arindamchatterjee8522 This would not be the greatest support for one's knees my friends given it doesn't have that extra layer of support. You are more so looking for a shoe that would be good for flat footedness or pronation, as these shoes come with much more extra support, which proves to be better for your knees!
Hello Jahongir, no the GT-1000 are specifically built for neutral arches or overpronation. If you want a shoe for supination the Gel-Cumulus and the Gel-Nimbus will be better for you!
Hello my friend, I will definitely make a video on it in the near future. If you need a quick answer though, the Gel-Cumulus and Gel-Nimbus will work best 🙏
@@redzuanzakarya2616 I did not say in the video that these were for supinators. I am sorry for the confusion! However, even if you are a supinator you can still wear these. Because they are built for people who overpronate, they have a lot of extra support in them, so if anything, you got yourself probably an even more supportive shoe than what you would have bought 🙏
@@kickinit7018 thanks friend, yes I agree with u, although it is specific for overpronation but it suit me well and really confy with my foot. Your content not confusing me and actually I just want to try these shoes. Again, thanks mate for your superb review. 👍👍
My apologies for the late reply my friend! It depends what type, support wise they are excellent for any type of physical activity! However, these do not have a lot of lateral support as basketball, squash or volleyball shoes would, so definitely keep that in mind!
I have both. I now known my flat feet are so happy in these shoes. I have a black men's GT 2000 9 (2E extra wide) and a women's GT 1000 10 (normal width). I love walking or cycling in them. I don't run anymore.
I was so happy when I could finally get a 2E version in Australia because my feet are so wide, they would always blow out the side of the shoe over time.
In a post COVID world, I wear either one of these on an every day basis at work as a teacher. Both do a good job. I wear the black ones when I'm teaching laboratory skills or have a risk of getting dirty. My GT 1000 were bought purely because they came in a pretty limited edition colour. I wear them when I'm wearing colourful clothes or when I don't have to worry about them getting dirty. I do notice that they are a little stiffer but not something that worries me. I like both to work out in. I do HIIT, spin and weights in either. I prefer the GT 2000 overall in terms of fit because they are the right width for me.
Eleanor! Glad to see a fellow teacher here on the page, I teach Science as well. I am glad to hear you have been such a fan of the GTs. I am normally a KAYANO kind of guy and am still rocking with my 25's and 26's. However, with school returning back to in class soon, maybe now will be the perfect time to give the new GT-2000's a try! I too also use these primarily more for walking or exercise over running. Stay safe and healthy my friend:)
@@kickinit7018 I just realised, I have the 4E width, not the 2E in the men's GT 2000.
Also, I get the GTs because I also have a tendency to roll my ankle in an outwards motion on top of having flat feet and wear orthotics. I need the stability provided by the GTs. I don't remember if the Kayanos are neutral or are designed for a supination or pronation, but it is why I wear the GTs.
@@eleanorchan872 The Kayano's are built very similarly to the GT's just a different feel more so! I've tried a couple of GTs in the past and was a huge fan of the cushioning, it was always so soft. Glad to see somebody taking advantage of the wide widths! I remember when I worked in retail many people being so thankful that Asics actually sold the same shoe simply in a wider width as they would check store after store and couldn't find something!
@@kickinit7018 hmm I might go try a Kayano to see how they feel in the future.
Are they good for someone with flat feet and who rolls their ankles outwards if I'm not careful?
@@kickinit7018 oh I love the extra extra wide widths. My feet are so ridiculously wide for the length.
I picked up a pair of Asics in Tokyo Station on holiday this summer after developing pain in, well basically it felt like ALL the bones in my foot. My knees were not good either. That is because I was carrying a backpack on concrete for up to 12 hours a day in Converse. Stupid. I have no idea what model of Asics they were. I think they were a JDM model. But it spurred me on to investigate this kind of shoe. So I bought a Kayano 31 in Harajuka...and then left the first shoes I bought behind as I left the city! Really unhappy about that. So far I have 3 pairs of Asics. :-) I have been amazed at the level of knowledge and support that is available on this subject. Thanks to everyone for education an old fogie like me. 👍
Eh? You seem to have failed to mention that the GT-2000 has gel in the front as well as the back whereas the GT-1000 only has gel in the back.
Your enthusiasm got me! I've subscribed! I'm a newbie, inconsistent runner, trying to get it together this year. Brooks Glycerin were my first and I'm currently loving the pillowyness of the Saucony ISO 2 (love love love). I tried on a pair of Asics Noosa some time ago (purely for the aesthetics) and loved the fit, but did not purchase because someone recommended the Nimbus and then the GT-1000 and then the 2000... sooo... was super confused until I came upon your videos! Thanks a bunch!!!
Thank you for the support Sinclair! With all the time off this is the perfect year to do it. Glad to hear that the Brooks and Saucony have worked well, I have been meaning to give a pair of Saucony's a shot. Maybe I'll give the ISO a try one of these days! Tell me about it, I do not have a pair of the Noosa's because the Gel-Kayano works so well for me (basically a souped up GT-2000), but I want one so bad because the new colours on the Noosa TRI-12 are amazing. No problem at all my friend, if you have any other questions feel free to let me know!
GT 2000 is the best budget friendly option that is lightweight and offers same cushion and support as Kayano's
^ Perfectly put my friend 👀👀
Great video. For me price has a significant influence. I was able to pick up the GT 1000 9 for £53, while the GT 2000 were around £100. The GT 2000 may be a better shoe, but not twice as good as the GT 1000.
Especially if you are getting the 1000's for basically half the price, that is amazing my friend!
Thanks man, going to the Asics store tomorrow
Glad to hear it my friend! I hope they turned out okay, you let me know which ones you picked up.
answer start at 3:30, don’t waiting time for a 6 mins of your life. and the answer is wrong. a. lot of bait for clicks youtubers out there
The moment I typed the shoe I want to wear Jordan is the first to video and he just answered my Question .. Thanks Brother keep up the great work and you got new follower
Hey there my friend. Much respects, this means a lot to me! I am glad I could help. Stay safe and healthy out there!
great work, lots of helpful info in your videos! thanks
Man, such an informative channel. it deserves m uch more subscribers. could you please do a review on the GT-4000? Also in comparison to the GT-1000? PLEASE! Would be much appreciated. I am not sure which to buy. If you could also compare the GT-4000 and GT-1000 to the Gel-Kayano 28, you would help me a lot! Thanks a lot!
Rajesh my friend! Thank you for the support, unfortunately I cannot review the GT-4000 only because I have no idea what it feels like and it is not available here in Canada :(
If it arrives though I will definitely head to the store and let you know!
@@kickinit7018 I see. But could you do a comparison of GT-1000 and Gel Kayano 28 please? Would be much appreciated. The GT-1000 is the "entry level" shoe, the Gel Kayano is considered to be Asics "top shoe". But what does that mean? Is the GT-1000 not as good? Or different?
@@RajeshGupta-hs1nx Hey Rajeh, specifically the GT-1000 is not built as premium as the Kayano. What that means is that it lacks in many of the aspects the Kayano has, the big one being cushioning. The Kayano has a very plush forefoot and great cushion in the heel, whereas a GT-1000 because it is an entry model it will have a lot less of that oh so glorious gel-cushioning. As a result, it tends to not be as comfortable. However, that does not mean it is a bad shoe, I have had people try on the GT-1000 and like it over the Gel-Kayano simply because how it gripped their foot type and shape better. So many of these things can be subjective if you know what I am saying.
@@kickinit7018 Thanks for the very helpful answer!
@@kickinit7018 Thanks for the nuanced answer! Very helpful!
You are doing a great job on the reviews....very helpful
Great review mate! Recently I got Infinity Jin.. please tell me if it's good for running, gym and in general as well.
Hey Himashu, I am excited to hear about your Infinity Jin. It looks beautiful! This shoe is a performance runner and can be used primarily for running activities. It is actually based/inspired from a previously beloved Asics runner known as the "Gel-Kinsei" which they discontinued (I don't know why it was excellent).
Asics usually doesn't recommend you use running shoes like this for the gym (i.e. weightlifting, lateral movements etc) as they do not have lateral support in them. They would prefer you buy low to the ground Asics gym specific shoes. However, if I am being honest, I very often use my Asics runners while working out in the gym and find them more than fine!
I hope this helped :).
@@kickinit7018 thanks alot! So nice of you brother.
@@himanshugera2830 Anytime my friend! If you ever have any question, you let me know!
Nice video 👍👍. Thanks for clearing the doubt. I am GT 1000 8 user, last year when i bought it i tried both 1000 & 2000 and i found 1000 was fiting to my foot and was more comfortable in terms of sizing. Whereas 2000 was more broad and foot was not fitting in properly. I am not saying the fitting should be tight but there should just right amount of breathing/expansion space for your foot. And in gt 2000 i found the space was either way more adequate for my size or if downsized it was way to less. No wonder why 1000 is mostly out of stock in india
Hey Saurabh, thanks a ton for your input! See, that right there is a perfect example of how the value of a shoe isn't always reflected in price. The GT-2000 might be a bit more expensive, but the GT-1000 is still great and even better for some people such as yourself 👍. I hope they turned out great, let me know what colour you got!
My size is 9.5 US. Is it a bad idea if i get the size 10 US in gt 2000? Thanks
thank you for covering this, very informative
No problem my friend!
GT 1000 9 vs GT 2000 7 vs GT 2000 8, how do you prioritize on the basis of running comfort and durability ?
Hey Subhasish, There is not going to be much of a difference in comfort or durability between the GT-2000 7 and GT-2000 8. This is because since these are the same model shoe, just different year, Asics does not want to change it too much as many people want to get the same shoe again each year. The one thing that they do change is fit though, so one might be more comfortable simply because it fits better. However, if we are talking about the cushioning in the shoe they will simply be the same between the 2000-7 and 2000-8. As for the 1000 vs either the GT-2000 7 or GT-2000 8, I would go with either of the 2000's. These shoes are built with a bit more structural support than the GT-1000. Since there is more support, this means that it will take longer to break that support down, therefore lasting you longer and being a more durable shoe! Hope that helped, if you have any other questions let me know 🙏
@@kickinit7018 thanks bro 🙏
@@kickinit7018 very nice information guys
Awesome videos man. I own the lovely Keyanos for walking/running but am looking for a daily shoe for work (teacher). Should I still go fancy with the Keyanos or will the GT line suffice? Thanks in advance
Hey Christopher! Glad to see a fellow teacher in the comments my friend! Offfff that is a tough one. I actually prefer the Gel-Kayano's for physical activity, me personally. I have owned the 23, 24, 25 and 26's and they have always done me well. However, I think the GT-2000 might be a bit better for work in the sense that they have a softer mid sole. The Gel-Kayano is typically stiffer in the mid sole, the GT-2000 is a bit more forgiving here and is just as if not more comfortable FOR LESS MONEY. I notice that the Kayano's with that stiff midsole can have your feet hurting if you are standing in one place or just doing general pacing around here and there. So if you are on your feet all day, particularly not moving or doing anything to physically active just regular walking around the classroom, I think the GT-2000's would be perfect. MY ONE EXCEPETION TO THIS ADVICE: If you are a Phys-Ed teacher (which I would be very jealous of haha), than I would stick with the Kayano's as you already know these always pull through for you when walking or running. Hope that helps, let me know if you have any other questions:)
@@kickinit7018 thanks for the awesome reply! Looks like I will definitely look into the GT-2000s then. I work with younger children so i do tend to move around a bit more but definitely not as much as a phys ed teacher! Thanks again
@@p1ngp0ng0 No problem Christopher, let me know how they turn out. Enjoy!
Decent didnt mention stability and spineshenks differences. Im obsessed with this shoe. Explain heel trail editions and knit. 2008 and b4 have better durability esp at toe top if you have toenials. Glue seperates premature post netting and foam molds gt 2000 3ish above
which one is narrower GT-1000 or GT-2000 ?
Honestly my friend the answer to that question changes each year. Asics fiddles around with the sizing of their models each year. So for example, the Gel-Kayano 23 was very narrow, but the next year I bought the Kayano 24 it was significantly wider. Last time I sold a pair of GT-1000's they had a significantly wider toe box than the 2000, but things definitely may have changed since then!
Thanks for the review. I just bought the gt-2000 yesterday and after a 15K training I found its stability truly amazing. I felt the insole is harder than my old wave rider 20 (I've been a rider fan over ten years) while trying on in store, quite worried at first. The shoes keeps my foot moving forward, easy to speed up. Now I get more interested in Asics. Mizuno now comes with a lot of series with tongue stitched, which make me feel uncomfortable with my high instep. Fortunately Asics keeps it separated. I'm nearly flatfoot, do u think the gt-1000 is adequate for the 15~18K road training? Or any Asics series model recommended?
Thank you~
Hello my friend, the GT-1000 will be suitable to provide the support you need. However, it will not have the gel-cushioning that you might need for that distance. It depends on you, I know me personally I could not do that distance without the comfort of more gel, and that is what you get with the GT-2000 over the GT-1000. I preferably ALWAYS go with the Gel-Kayano, it is a fantastic shoe. The midsole is stiffer than the GT-2000 but the structural support is sensational. I would say stick GT-2000 or get one of last years models of the Kayano on a discount, they don't change much from year to year besides fit!
excellent video, thank you very much. Could you tell me the distance to use for a pair of GT-1000-11 in a race? 21 kms? 30 kms? thanks again
??
Hey, I ran last season in GT-2000 and it is the best shoe I had so far (pronator) but, as I am going below 4:30 I feel it is not hmm... responsive enough to make that pace feel good. Should I go for GT-1000 for less cushioning (and better feeling) or you recommend something different?
Hmmm Marek, that is a tough one. The GT-2000 is an excellent shoe. The GT-1000 will not necessarily fit your foot better. It could, but you need to try it on in person in order to see (which you may not be able to depending on the area you live and COVID)! At the same time, I do not think the GT-1000 will provide as much responsiveness as the GT-2000. It may be similar or just a bit short, if you are looking for more responsiveness I would go with the Gel-Kayano! It is the shoe I use as a pronator and has been my go to Asics for years. I currently own the 23, 24, 25 and 26's! Let me know if you have any questions about it!
@@kickinit7018 Thanks for your answer. If I can have another one, is there a starting stability shoe or pronator shoe. Something lighter that could be taken for competitions?
@@marekstepien5450 Sure my friend. The GT-1000 would be a good beginner pronator, but it is not necessarily light. If you are looking to use it for a competition, and want it to be on the lighter side - The Gel-Noosa Tri would be amazing. Be aware though, Asics overpronation support is called "Duomax". Asics use to regularly have Duomax in the Gel-Noosa Tri, then they took it away, then they brought it back, and then this year they have taken it away again. Hence, the Gel-Noosa Tri 13 from this year does not have Duomax. However, on their website they still have many last year models of the Gel- Noosa Tri 12, which did have that Duomax overpronation support. This would be super lightweight! I have a video on it on my channel if you'd like more information: ruclips.net/video/usigh5ocrBA/видео.html&ab_channel=KickinIt
Excellent job!!
Thank you, thank you!
Which one is better for half and full marathon?
Very helpful. Thank you.
Thank you grettings from switzerland
I have always wanted to go! Greetings my friend. No problem and stay healthy! :)
I've been wearing the GT 2000 model for many years. I have supination that causes the outer heels of my soles to wear down. Is this model a good choice for foot supination? Thank you.
Hello Kimberly, this shoe is built more so for people who overpronate. So technically speaking it is not built for people whose arches roll outwards (Supination) but more so whose arches roll in (Pronation). However, this does not mean it is necessarily bad for you. Although it may not be correcting your Supination issue, because it is built for overpronaters it has a lot of extra support built in, which is beneficial for you! How has it felt over the last several years, has it worked?
Kiko Kostadinov got me into ASICS heavy
who?
@@grrrbrrr9053 check em out. Belgian designer and has penned some beautiful collaborations with ASICS. Now he is the creative director of the ASICS Sportstyle line. He’s recently revitalized the Gel Kayano 14
Good review, but I feel like you were about to come out the screen and yell in my face
Haha sorry if I scared you Cullen! Glad I could help!
I have flat foot i need daily uses shoes for local market walking so which one is good for overpronation
Definitely the GT-1000, GT-2000 and if you are willing to spend the money, the Gel-Kayano!
Great info
They need to bring back GT 2160
I was never able to try the in between models as here in Canada we've only had the 1000 and 2000 the last several years. Would you say the 2160 was better than the 2000?
Will you be reviewing Novablast and compare it to Roadblast and upcoming Dynablast? P.S. Kayano Lite is coming!!!!
Hi there Kai, Sorry for the delay! Unfortunately as of now I will not be reviewing Novablast as my go to light weight shoe is the Dynaflyte and I already have a pair stocked up. However, if I swing by Asics and they feel absolutely incredible I will definitely pick them up then. I shall keep you posted if things change. Kayano Lite as in LITEshow or do you mean an altered version like the Nimbus Lite? The Kayano is my go to shoe so that would be amazing:o!
Kickin It I see. I’m still interested to see your review of dynablast as well :D. Btw, I meant Kayano Lite as in same VER of Nimbus lite, and I heard they will be available in Oct 1st
@@kaishunider4110 Haha if I get them or even give them a try on, I will definitely do a video on it my friend:) Also, that is amazing I did not know that about the Kayano Lite. I hope that means they might be more lightweight. I love the Kayano, and it is my favourite shoe, but the one draw back is all that structural support adds weight you know. Fingers crossed!
@@kickinit7018 Yes sir~ Fingers crossed. Also, Asics face cover is coming :D~~~!!
Hii i just see this vidio cause i start running. And i am wearing nb fresh foam 1080v10And thinking to go 1000 9 is it good choice?
Hey my friends, I have never worn the NB Freshfoam. However, what I can say is that if you are a overpronator or flatfooted, the GT-1000 will do great in providing you with the support that you need. I would try them in store to be sure. Let me know if you have anymore questions!
I got a pair of each lol. They just arrived today
Glad to hear it my friend! Give them a try and let me know how they go!
My left ankle is flatfoot what should I go with 1000 Or 2000
Both will do your feet good my friend, it depends more so on how much gel-cushioning you want. If you need a softer shoe to be comfortable, go with the GT-2000. If you don't necessarily need the shoe to be nice and soft and want to save some money, the GT-1000 will do you well!
Gt 2000 9 vs gt 4000 2 can you please tell
Gt 4000 2 reviews says that it help flat foot please help me
@@vadapallysuraj8263 Hello Vadapally, unfortunately I am not too familiar with the GT-4000 as we don't have them in Canada. To know if it really helps with flat feet, you must check to make sure it has Duomax. Honestly, 1000, 2000, 4000, if any of them have duomax they will serve to be fine in protecting you against overpronation!
Which is a good Asics shoe for high arch feet with under probation.
Definitely the Gel-Nimbus or the Gel-Cumulus my friend. The Nimbus will have more cushion out of the 2!
@@kickinit7018 thank you for enlighten🙏🙏🙏
Helpful video cheers!
No problem Andrew, glad I could help. If you ever have any other questions, feel free to let me know!
Thanks 👍
Anytime my friend!
My size is 9.5 US. Can i get a size 10 US? Thanks
Hello Rody, definitely!
What about gel kayano vs gt 2000?
You read my mind my friend! I am actually going to be putting out a video on this very soon! Honestly though, the short answer is there is very minimal difference between the two. Both offer a high level of support and excellent cushion, they are more so different simply in fit. The GT-2000 typically has less stiff of a midsole too. It also comes at a cheaper price tag! :) Let me know if you have any other questions.
At this price range Nike or asics is best?
Hey Arindam! It depends more so on your personal preferences. Nike shoes will be more minimal, which makes them lighter weight and that is a fantastic feeling. At the same time though, Nike shoes typically won't have as much cushion or specifically support as these Asics shoes do. This allows the Asics to feel very nice and comfy but just a tad bit heavier. If you appreciate cushion and support, go Asics. If you want something more lightweight and minimal, go Nike. Let me know if you have any other questions :)
@@kickinit7018 I have patellar pain in my right leg.. Please suggest shoe that help me for my running..
@@arindamchatterjee8522 If you are having pain in your knees, I would go for an Asics shoe that has a lot of support. The cushion and support is going to help take the pressure off your knees. I would go with the GT-2000 or the Gel-Kayano! I have a tear in my left ACL and suffered from knee pains and the Kayano did wonders for me. The latest Gel-Kayano 28 is full price right now, but you can find plenty of last years models (Gel-Kayano 27) for cheap at places like Running Room, Sportscheck etc :) Let me know if you have any other questions!
@@kickinit7018 recently I bought puma deviate nitro.. can it help my lcl tear injury?
@@arindamchatterjee8522 This would not be the greatest support for one's knees my friends given it doesn't have that extra layer of support. You are more so looking for a shoe that would be good for flat footedness or pronation, as these shoes come with much more extra support, which proves to be better for your knees!
Any idea about the GT 4000???
Unfortunately I do not my friend, as this is not a model that is sold in Toronto/Canada:(
Are gt 1000 10 good for supination as well?
Hello Jahongir, no the GT-1000 are specifically built for neutral arches or overpronation. If you want a shoe for supination the Gel-Cumulus and the Gel-Nimbus will be better for you!
Hi.. can u suggest asics shoes for supination foot. Thanks
Hello my friend, I will definitely make a video on it in the near future. If you need a quick answer though, the Gel-Cumulus and Gel-Nimbus will work best 🙏
@@kickinit7018 I bought these shoes after watch your review 😅. Is there any bad impact if I wear these shoes with supinator foots?
@@redzuanzakarya2616 I did not say in the video that these were for supinators. I am sorry for the confusion! However, even if you are a supinator you can still wear these. Because they are built for people who overpronate, they have a lot of extra support in them, so if anything, you got yourself probably an even more supportive shoe than what you would have bought 🙏
@@kickinit7018 thanks friend, yes I agree with u, although it is specific for overpronation but it suit me well and really confy with my foot. Your content not confusing me and actually I just want to try these shoes. Again, thanks mate for your superb review. 👍👍
I don’t why but i feel GT 2000 heavy
Is it good for indoor game ?
My apologies for the late reply my friend! It depends what type, support wise they are excellent for any type of physical activity! However, these do not have a lot of lateral support as basketball, squash or volleyball shoes would, so definitely keep that in mind!
From India🇮🇳 got GT1000 for ₹ 3800
Not bad my friend!
From where did you find the shoe at this price?
@@hrishikarawat6144 showroom
I subscribed you for get 750....
Thank you my friend! It is greatly appreciated on the road to 1000 :)
Just got pair gt 1000s 9 for £47 bargain
Hey Phillip, I am not going to lie, I am a bit jealous! That is a crazy and amazing price! What colour did you get??
They only had black for my size but I’m happy with them feel like older kayanos
@@philipplee78 Nothing beats a good price my friend! I might have to get a pair, I have been reminiscing and missing my Gel-Kayano 23!
If you don't run get the 1000
Can i use the GT-1000 for a marathon ?
Kiko Kostadinov got me into ASICS heavy
That's awesome man! Appreciate anyone who can push and bring recognition to the brand. It does not get the credit it deserves!