7 MLB teams in danger of RELOCATION

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 7 июн 2024
  • Join this channel to access perks ✅ brodie.bz/join
    Chapters:
    0:00 7 of 30 teams... is a problem
    1:18 Tampa Bay Rays
    3:02 Oakland A's
    4:43 Kansas City Royals
    6:29 Chicago White Sox
    8:55 St. Louis Cardinals
    10:49 Los Angeles Angels
    13:17 Arizona Diamondbacks
    MY AVIATION CHANNEL ✈️ brodie.bz/Aviation
    HOME STUDIO PRO 🎥 brodie.bz/Production
    📺 Subscribe ➡️ brodie.bz/RUclips
    📸 Instagram ➡️ brodie.bz/IG
    📰 Features ➡️ brodie.bz/Read
    🎧 Podcast ➡️ brodie.bz/Apple
    ✳️ Spotify ➡️ brodie.bz/Spotify
    🐦 Twitter ➡️ brodie.bz/TW
    👍 Facebook ➡️ brodie.bz/FB
    #mlb #baseball #sports
  • СпортСпорт

Комментарии • 639

  • @brodiebrazil
    @brodiebrazil  Месяц назад +7

    Some other videos you might like:
    NHL Utah (AMAZING) Concept logos & jerseys
    📺 ruclips.net/video/yv1jRBaZv6E/видео.html
    Royals & Chiefs NOT moving to Kansas (...yet)
    📺 ruclips.net/video/jqyUe4HiKNE/видео.html
    Arizona Coytes AFTERMATH of move to Utah (with Leah Merrall)
    📺 ruclips.net/video/DemOBSJhLQw/видео.html
    what's REAL about pro sports renderings?
    📺 ruclips.net/video/FJ7ErxbalB8/видео.html
    Las Vegas now has COMPETING NBA bids for expansion team
    📺 ruclips.net/video/ppy3Yw6-ITY/видео.html
    Things could be better (and worse) for SF Giants
    📺 ruclips.net/video/CsD1n7tt6wQ/видео.html
    REPORT: NIKE will fix MLB uniform problems by 2025, or sooner
    📺 ruclips.net/video/sPd-mJ3TLlI/видео.html
    Baltimore Orioles: most PROMISING MLB team?
    📺 ruclips.net/video/8_ksswFEW94/видео.html
    MLB's most OVERLOOKED superstar: Yogi Berra
    📺 ruclips.net/video/jUCyezaUvIo/видео.html
    MLB Pitcher explains NEW system to grade, promote & relegate UMPIRES
    📺 ruclips.net/video/hhtZPqKQOVU/видео.html
    The $900M that brought NHL to UTAH?
    📺 ruclips.net/video/x35eNkRHYdk/видео.html
    Pros & Cons of EVERY UTAH NHL team name (plus my choice)
    📺 ruclips.net/video/ebB2Wd98Ufc/видео.html

    • @skiparkcityut
      @skiparkcityut Месяц назад +2

      Some of those Utah jerseys look amazing! It’s good to add a city exploding with population and young people for the NHL

  • @thedailytalon9259
    @thedailytalon9259 Месяц назад +283

    There is zero chance the Cardinals relocate

    • @adamNDkipker
      @adamNDkipker Месяц назад +24

      That's exactely what I said when I seen the Cardinals on this list...That will never happen the CARDINALS WILL NEVER LEAVE !!!!

    • @floridajack7222
      @floridajack7222 Месяц назад +22

      St. Louis - a drinking town with a baseball problem…

    • @brodiebrazil
      @brodiebrazil  Месяц назад +25

      maybe not today, but this is exactly how it begins

    • @michaelleroy9281
      @michaelleroy9281 Месяц назад +5

      That they're even talking about it is not good

    • @westvillefinest697
      @westvillefinest697 Месяц назад +1

      😂😂😂😂😂😂

  • @samuelfrick3475
    @samuelfrick3475 Месяц назад +183

    There’s no way the Cardinals move 🤣

    • @brodiebrazil
      @brodiebrazil  Месяц назад +5

      correct, not now. but: if this public funding thing gets messy after 10 years...

    • @scottrichardson4086
      @scottrichardson4086 Месяц назад +15

      While the Cardinals request of $500M + in public money is ludicrous, the thought that they might leave the St. Louis area is even more ludicrous. And you mentioned the age of the stadium being around 25 years old……this is actually the 19th year in this stadium, opened in 2006. By the way, love all of your content but this one is a huge stretch.

    • @MountainFisher
      @MountainFisher Месяц назад +4

      @@scottrichardson4086 Have you seen the crime in St. Louis, empty downtown bldgs? Brodie is right. it's a matter of time.

    • @JitterMac1019
      @JitterMac1019 Месяц назад +9

      😂😂😂 absolute zero chance that the saint louis cards move to out of downtown saint louis

    • @user-lh6pf9rh5r
      @user-lh6pf9rh5r Месяц назад +5

      @@brodiebrazil You are hilarious. The St. Louis fanbase is irreplaceable. Most dedicated fans in baseball.

  • @heathrunyon4036
    @heathrunyon4036 Месяц назад +97

    Cardinals are staying in St. Louis

  • @patricktyler2347
    @patricktyler2347 Месяц назад +106

    Relocating the Cardinals would seriously be like relocating the Yankees. St. Louis is one of MLB's flagship teams, there is exactly a 0% chance they move my guy.

    • @HighpointerGeocacher
      @HighpointerGeocacher Месяц назад +5

      The City of St. Louis has a population of less than 280,000 so it is a city in decline. Considering there are several metropolitan areas without an MLB team that are more populous than St. Louis, then relocation is not out of the question.

    • @tdubmusketeer
      @tdubmusketeer Месяц назад +16

      @@HighpointerGeocacherthe STL metro has 2.8 million people. So yeah they’re safe

    • @HighpointerGeocacher
      @HighpointerGeocacher Месяц назад +1

      @@tdubmusketeer If you look at current population trends, the Charlotte metropolitan area has surpassed the St. Louis metropolitan area in population, and Charlotte is growing at a fast rate while the St. Louis area population is declining. Charlotte is on the NC-SC border, so combining the population of the two Carolinas you would have over 16 million people.
      Thus, if the St. Louis Cardinals moved to Charlotte, they could have over 16 million people in their region. In contrast, the population of Missouri is about 6.2 million, but that is shared with two teams so consider that approximately half of those people would be in the Cardinals region of the state. That is about 3.1 million people. St. Louis is adjacent to southern Illinois, but most of the population of Illinois resides in greater Chicago (which has two teams). If you used 2024 population estimates, then the number of people living in southern Illinois is around 2 or 3 million. Thus, if we round up to 3 million, and add half the population of Missouri, then we get around 6 or 7 million. That is less than half of the combined population of the two Carolinas.
      Thus, it could make sense, from a long-term perspective, for the Cardinals to consider a move to Charlotte. This is not the 1950's anymore, population distributions and demographics have changed markedly throughout the United States. One could say that the Cardinals are an "iconic" franchise that wouldn't move, but the Brooklyn Dodgers and New York Giants could have been considered in that category in the 1950's yet both moved to California. At that time, California (which is now a state in decline) was viewed in much the same way as the Carolinas are today (both booming states with a lot of population growth, particularly from the northern USA as well as from other parts of the USA and internationally).
      en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metropolitan_statistical_area

    • @cmbox1184
      @cmbox1184 Месяц назад +11

      @@HighpointerGeocacherthat’s irrelevant considering they still draw better crowds than most of the league. Just because a city has more people doesn’t mean they’ll show up to games

    • @justinzeid212
      @justinzeid212 Месяц назад +3

      @@HighpointerGeocacher I'm not included in that 280,000 and a drive to the ballpark for me is about 25 minutes.

  • @tonyc8752
    @tonyc8752 Месяц назад +120

    Cardinals? 😂😂😂 that’s 0 percent chance

    • @boogitybear2283
      @boogitybear2283 Месяц назад +1

      The Cardinals need to be like the Green Bay Packers. Owned by the FANS!

    • @moetmike
      @moetmike Месяц назад +1

      Never underestimate The cheapness and greed of these owners. They always want someone else to pay for their sh!t.

  • @skaftonmd8916
    @skaftonmd8916 Месяц назад +19

    There is ZERO chance the Cardinals would EVER leave St. Louis. Leave downtown? Maybe. Leave the St. Louis Metro or even leave Missouri? NO CHANCE. They will of course need funding, but most will likely not come from the city, even if it’s threatened. A new ownership group would be much more likely, but I also doubt that would happen either.
    St. Louis was willing to put up, and voted in favor of, 300M with an extra 100M down the road to keep the Rams when the NFL promised to fund 200M before breaking that deal. In fact, St. Louis put so much into keeping the Rams, that they forced a settlement from the NFL in court for their foul play in moving to LA. Hell, look at what we did to keep the Blues back in 1983 - which prevented them from moving to Saskatoon. To think that St. Louis would not go further than any city in baseball to keep their team is just insane. This is wild speculative propaganda.
    The only way a professional sports team leaves St. Louis is if the entire league wants that team to move regardless of what’s done to keep the team. Which could of course happen, but for MLB? I highly doubt it…

  • @Chudley716
    @Chudley716 Месяц назад +15

    Who builds a state of the art house and abandons it after 30 years? It’s crazy what the taxpayers are forced to pay for in sports.

  • @jimpagano2343
    @jimpagano2343 Месяц назад +26

    0% chance the Cardinals move. The current stadium opened in 2006. Kind of hard to imagine "Ballpark Village" without a Ballpark.

  • @JohnHillRSNStudios
    @JohnHillRSNStudios Месяц назад +27

    The fact that there are rumors that the Cardinals of all teams could move is a scary thing for baseball, given how much St Louis loves the Cards and the deep tradition that team has in that city.

    • @Bob-Loblaw13
      @Bob-Loblaw13 Месяц назад +11

      There’s no way the cards would move. The city is like top 3 when it comes being a baseball town. And if they did, a new team would set up shop in a heart beat

    • @uvutv-ol8qk
      @uvutv-ol8qk Месяц назад +7

      You don't want piss off STL. The city finally has a football team. Even though it's in the UFL, the fans broke the spring league record for attendance. Imagine what would happen if the Cards left.

    • @JohnHillRSNStudios
      @JohnHillRSNStudios Месяц назад +2

      @@uvutv-ol8qk yeah that’s the thing: they turn out at least three times four times the crowd for a spring league football team and regularly pack out Busch. Heck if they could get an NBA team there they’d support them too.

    • @samelmudir
      @samelmudir 29 дней назад

      If the cards move I'd stop watching baseball. One of the 5 cornerstone franchises in the sport. And I'm not even a cards fan

  • @zch7491
    @zch7491 Месяц назад +22

    St Louis is going through a cash grab, not a legit relocation threat

  • @mactheknife7049
    @mactheknife7049 Месяц назад +16

    With the exception of the Cardinals? Any relocation threat by a team mentioned here would be met with a "Go ahead... we dare you" response.

  • @damonselman636
    @damonselman636 Месяц назад +14

    Sorry the Cardinals should not be included with the others. I live among Cardinals fans and that fanbase is like MLB version of Packers fans (a fanbase a lot larger than the teams city would otherwise indicate) and they are what ESPN think Red Sox fans are.

  • @dannythunder3180
    @dannythunder3180 Месяц назад +19

    Busch stadium opened in 2006, so it's 18 years old

  • @RldMemories
    @RldMemories Месяц назад +16

    I'm a Phillies fan and went to their spring training in 2023. Before I came home, I went to the Rays' opening day game and that stadium was great, from the food to the view. The worst thing about it was driving to the stadium. My Air Bnb was located 25 mins away but took me nearly 2 hours to get there. That's why it's never sold out because of the location. The new stadium will have the same problems with low attendance. Get it out of St. Petersburg.....

    • @mascott1157
      @mascott1157 Месяц назад

      Living in one of Tampa’s suburbs, I actually enjoy Tropicana and the owners have done a good job keeping it updated over the years for what they have, but that drive once you get to 275 in Pinellas is character building.

    • @petertalsness3238
      @petertalsness3238 Месяц назад +1

      Move it to the fairgrounds area at the intersection of I-4 and I-75

  • @jesusm2159
    @jesusm2159 Месяц назад +19

    Mlb is embarrassing to sports

  • @EPiche09
    @EPiche09 Месяц назад +15

    St Louis really needs a new stadium? What ever happened to building things to last. Unbelievable. The two most recognized stadiums in the league are 100 years old

    • @michaelleroy9281
      @michaelleroy9281 Месяц назад +1

      The Cardinals have played in 3 stadiums in their history and they want another one?

    • @ThatIanShane
      @ThatIanShane Месяц назад +1

      The aren't asking for a new stadium. They are asking for a capital improvement of the current Busch Stadium. Renovations, repairs, upgrades...that sort of thing.

  • @JuanNunez2023
    @JuanNunez2023 Месяц назад +25

    I would put the Marlins over the Cardinals. I know the Marlins got a new shiny stadium in 2012, but that didn't fix their attendance woes. Their ownership continues to be bad. It's not going to happen in the next 5 years, but in 10-15 years I could see the Marlins being sold and moved out of MIami.

    • @leguy5662
      @leguy5662 Месяц назад +4

      I can't see the MLB leaving Miami.

    • @fatzotv
      @fatzotv Месяц назад +1

      @@leguy5662 i agree, Miami is the next Megacity blossoming, the market will just be too big to not have a team in it

    • @leguy5662
      @leguy5662 Месяц назад +2

      Cardinals not moving either

    • @James_Ford4815
      @James_Ford4815 Месяц назад +4

      @@fatzotv Miami needs to change back to their old turquoise uniforms but instead of a big F just change it to a big M. That alone would immediately garner them a hoard of new young fans from all over the country. Having the most flashy of uniform and colors is what 8yr - 20yr of this day in age use to pick which team they support. I would think a lot of older fans with nostalgia would come back to support as well. But it would need to be done at the same time as some splashy free agent signings and a team that at least be in contention of making the wild card game or playoffs.
      Sadly though ownership is more in line of the Oankland A's where they're not willing to spend on free agents until attendance is up , so they get stuck in this awful downward trend of bad seasons and horrible attendance with no way out.

    • @michaelleroy9281
      @michaelleroy9281 Месяц назад +1

      So that stadium in Miami sits empty, then what the hell did they build it for? nothing

  • @chriscreaturo8809
    @chriscreaturo8809 Месяц назад +12

    St. Louis is a staple franchise. I do not see that team moving

  • @bena.3955
    @bena.3955 Месяц назад +8

    There are not enough cities available to support all these teams that want to move.

    • @americangiant1003
      @americangiant1003 Месяц назад

      Exactly Bena. At most only 4-5 cities/regions in the US and Canada can or really wants a MLB team without having to go to Mexico or even into Asia. I agree.

  • @michaelleroy9281
    @michaelleroy9281 Месяц назад +52

    Nashville isn't big enough for 7 major league teams even New York only has 2

    • @Hogtownboy1
      @Hogtownboy1 Месяц назад +2

      Ba da boom

    • @sabertoothbaseball3432
      @sabertoothbaseball3432 Месяц назад +5

      Nashville citizens don't want to pay for one team. The cost of living in Nashville has skyrocketed, and the Mayor was elected on a promise of not one dollar to finance another sports venue. Rumor has it that the Grizzlies have looked into leaving Memphis for Nashville, but that wouldn't require any funds for an arena, just a juggling of scheduling with the Predators.
      Only if Larry Ellison builds a stadium on the future Oracle Nashville campus is there a real chance for MLB in Nashville. The Nashville Stars group doesn't have the financing to get it done in expansion, and anybody wanting to move to Nashville will have to build their own ballpark.

    • @wendellblackett8317
      @wendellblackett8317 Месяц назад +1

      They may get A.A if Vegas calls throug h

    • @FischerFan
      @FischerFan Месяц назад

      Nashville shouldn't have an NHL team. It should have an AHL team and could probably support an NBA team.

    • @sabertoothbaseball3432
      @sabertoothbaseball3432 Месяц назад

      @@FischerFan the Predators sell out almost every game and have for years. There is more feverish support for them than for the Titans.

  • @paulamcdonald5446
    @paulamcdonald5446 Месяц назад +9

    Anyone that supports public funding of stadiums owned by billionaires better not complain about taxes, raising minimum wage, etc. You are allowing socialized costs and losses with privatized profits.

  • @makscho1
    @makscho1 Месяц назад +7

    I’m speaking honestly and from the heart when I say if the athletics and their minor-league team, the aviators were playing the same night here in Vegas, I would 100% go to the aviators game. The aviators experience is so user-friendly and enjoyable, why would I spend double the ticket cost, pay for parking, and battle with strip traffic to watch a mediocre team? They are doing really well though right now.

  • @sofaking8228
    @sofaking8228 Месяц назад +5

    It would be very funny if each of these teams' cities told them, "No. Go ahead, move." Where would they go?

  • @fatzotv
    @fatzotv Месяц назад +9

    cardinals relocation is insane lol how many busch stadiums am i gonna see in my lifetime ha. the other 6 i could see relocating somehow... this is also why i dont understand why MLB would be considering expansion with so many teams having these issues

  • @tombraiderstrums09
    @tombraiderstrums09 Месяц назад +12

    Fans still packing out Wrigley and Fenway, but we got other crybaby owners whining that their 20yo stadiums are “too old” and they need taxpayer funds to build a bigger better one. Gimme a break

    • @Narutowatcher465
      @Narutowatcher465 Месяц назад

      "It's time to leave the K" -John Sherman, Royals. Whiny ass baby.

  • @thebaseballnerd4570
    @thebaseballnerd4570 Месяц назад +11

    This is why I like hockey a little bit more than MLB in the NHL as well as the commissioner. Will do everything humanly possible to keep a team in a market. With the MLB will just threaten relocation it’s chunk change.

    • @bena.3955
      @bena.3955 Месяц назад

      He bent over backwards so much for the Coyotes. It wouldn’t have shocked me if they had put a temporary rink on the border in Yuma before considering leave AZ 😆

    • @Enginshim
      @Enginshim Месяц назад

      As an Islander fan, I agree 100%

    • @PoliticallyIncorrect90
      @PoliticallyIncorrect90 Месяц назад +2

      Bettman gave up on Atlanta quickly, but for some reason didn't on Phoenix, which has arena issues. Atlanta didn't have an arena issue. Think about that. ATL had a bad hockey team with poor ownership, but it's a top 10 market and size with a good arena. But he just pulled the team without much thought.

    • @UserName-ts3sp
      @UserName-ts3sp Месяц назад

      @@PoliticallyIncorrect90the thrashers were left homeless too. the previous owners still owned now-state farm arena and in a lawsuit mess. thats why the thrashers moved to winnipeg so quickly, unlike arizona who got 15 years to fix it

  • @clarkst.4190
    @clarkst.4190 Месяц назад +3

    Moving the Cardinals out of St. Louis is like moving the Cowboys out of Dallas or the Maple Leafs out of Toronto. Will NEVER happen.

    • @vancedurbin1132
      @vancedurbin1132 29 дней назад

      The Cowboys play in Arlington and not Dallas.

    • @clarkst.4190
      @clarkst.4190 28 дней назад

      @@vancedurbin1132 😂semantics

    • @michaelleroy9281
      @michaelleroy9281 27 дней назад +1

      Actually the Cowboys have moved twice, to Irving then to Arlington

  • @joshuadesautels
    @joshuadesautels Месяц назад +15

    The CARDINALS??

    • @user-jf4nj3ez2k
      @user-jf4nj3ez2k Месяц назад +3

      The Cardinals could move out of the city of St Louis if everything would fall apart with their relationship with the city.
      Would move out to one of the suburbs.

    • @rangersking6699
      @rangersking6699 Месяц назад +4

      @@user-jf4nj3ez2kthat’s not relocation lol that’s like saying the pistons relocated. No, that’s just moving into a new arena in a different part of town.

    • @Bob-Loblaw13
      @Bob-Loblaw13 Месяц назад

      @@user-jf4nj3ez2kthere’s no way that would happen. Busch stadium is literally in the best spot possible for the city. Attendance would drastically be affected if they moved to stl county or further

    • @HighpointerGeocacher
      @HighpointerGeocacher Месяц назад

      @@Bob-Loblaw13 The Braves used data analytics and geographic information systems (GIS) to determine the area where the largest number of their fans came from and used that data to determine the location to build their current stadium in a suburban area of Atlanta, relocating from the location of their two prior stadiums in central Atlanta. This has enabled the Braves to improve their attendance and maintain their team success.

  • @mattkramer4132
    @mattkramer4132 Месяц назад +14

    I'm a baseball fan, but all I want to do is chill and see a ballgame & have a hot dog. There's no real need for these multibillion dollar facilities.

    • @acatani17
      @acatani17 Месяц назад

      Yeah the corporate feel of all new stadiums is off putting I hate it. But it's all about the all mighty dollar now. They don't care about the real fans for a long time now.

  • @timothysworld1028
    @timothysworld1028 Месяц назад +5

    1. Fenway Park -- Boston Red Sox
    2. Wrigley Field -- Chicago Cubs
    3. Dodger Stadium -- Los Angeles Dodgers
    4. Angel Stadium -- Los Angeles Angels
    5. Oakland Coliseum -- Oakland Athletics
    MBL stadiums by age.

  • @vincenzof3863
    @vincenzof3863 Месяц назад +5

    Montreal Expos were waiting for a team in Montreal.

  • @ronwebster1114
    @ronwebster1114 Месяц назад +3

    First, i wouldn't consider a team staying in the same market as a relocation (Anaheim v Long Beach for example).
    Second, a problem is the owners are getting even more greedy. Just a stadium isnt enough. It has to be a palace, and they want to have the surrounding area as well to develop as part of the cost.

  • @tombraiderstrums09
    @tombraiderstrums09 Месяц назад +5

    I wonder if the Diamondbacks and Coyotes joined forces, would that change circumstances enough so they could make another run at that land in Tempe? It’s not the same referendum if the development proposal changes significantly.
    Of course, that would require Alex Meruelo to be nice to someone, and I think we all know how that’s likely to turn out 🙄

  • @jasonfire3434
    @jasonfire3434 Месяц назад +3

    It’s not limited to these seven, basically every 30 years every team’s fans save for 5-6 of the best markets will have to be on relocation watch in perpetuity.

  • @S_Over_Street
    @S_Over_Street Месяц назад +9

    How I see all these teams end up…
    Cardinals- staying in the St Louis area. MLB will work any way possible to keep one of their top staple franchises in that area.
    Rays - if St Pete (& county) don’t approve that new ballpark they’re moving to Orlando.
    White Sox - if state doesn’t approve funding (which I doubt they will) they’ll likely move. Which city? IDK is my guess.
    Royals - moving to Kansas City, Kansas.
    Angels - staying somewhere in Orange County.
    D-Backs - will get a new ballpark somewhere in the Phoenix region. Probably near Scottsdale.
    Athletics- hate to say this as I wish they’d stay in Oakland too…. Las Vegas as planned by the end of this decade.

    • @CubeInspector
      @CubeInspector Месяц назад +3

      No the rays will not move to Orlando. If they move theyre moving to Montreal like they were already trying to half time with.
      Going to Orlando won't solve the problem. Orlando isn't a good market and there's no place to put a stadium because if all the theme parks.

    • @nikolaspaz8820
      @nikolaspaz8820 Месяц назад +2

      I honestly think the Rays deal will get approved

    • @americangiant1003
      @americangiant1003 Месяц назад +1

      @@nikolaspaz8820 I think as of May 2024, the Rays staying in St Pete/Tampa region is at best 50/50. With that said, I agree with CubeInspector. It’s either a new 30,000 retractable roof ballpark in St Pete. Or the Rays move most likely to either Montreal or wild card the Charlotte area. FYI. The only way Montreal gets a MLB is a relocated one. It’s Nashville, Charlotte and Salt Lake City for the 2 new teams.

    • @nikolaspaz8820
      @nikolaspaz8820 Месяц назад +3

      @@americangiant1003 I live in Florida so I’ve heard a lot about it I would say it’s alittle bit more than 50/50 due to the fact that the mayor of St. Pete is in favor of this deal and a lot of big businesses are also in support of it like the St. Pete NCAAP which is an important endorsement but nonetheless the city council members are voting on it so far 3 out of the 8 members are skeptic, a tie would mean no deal but by the looks of it it’s pretty close and ultimately I think it’ll pass obviously could be wrong we’ve seen things change pretty quickly before but there’s a lot of benefits here especially the Hines group which has designed so many great projects the only thing I don’t like is taxpayers paying for almost half but the Rays made sure to not get that on the ballot

    • @michaelleroy9281
      @michaelleroy9281 27 дней назад +1

      Montreal needs a new ballpark for a team to move there

  • @michaelleroy9281
    @michaelleroy9281 14 дней назад +2

    Now that Salt Lake City has approved 900 million for facilities , could the White Sox move there? It will take approval of owners of course

  • @timmccrory7630
    @timmccrory7630 Месяц назад +5

    We want you as a sportscaster here in Houston Texas. So that is another relocation.

  • @MountainFisher
    @MountainFisher Месяц назад +6

    Arte Moreno had threatened to move up the freeway to Diamond Bar a few years ago. No way Arte moves to Long Beach, be cheaper to buy land in Diamond Bar than Long Beach on the water. I went to the Big A on Opening Day 1966 and watched them play at Chavez Ravine for the three years prior. Fun fact, Dodger Stadium was always called Chavez Ravine when the Angels played there. Was called Dodger Stadium when the Dodgers played. My uncle always thought it was funny.
    The Rays attendance will improve just by moving out of that dark musty stadium. But Florida just hasn't been a big baseball state, I guess from having so many transplants there.

    • @robertlee6781
      @robertlee6781 Месяц назад

      Even more interesting, the Angels played in Wrigley Field their first season. Granted the LA Wrigley Field.

    • @HighpointerGeocacher
      @HighpointerGeocacher Месяц назад

      You wrote, "Fun fact, Dodger Stadium was always called Chavez Ravine when the Angels played there. Was called Dodger Stadium when the Dodgers played."
      Similar to when the Jets moved from Shea Stadium to Giants Stadium, the Jets called it The Meadowlands when they played there.

    • @MountainFisher
      @MountainFisher Месяц назад

      @@HighpointerGeocacher I remember that, but I wasn't aware that was the reason. I wondered why the stadium was called the 2 names. I remember the first time I saw it from the NJ Turnpike out there in the middle of what looked like a marsh to me.

    • @UserName-ts3sp
      @UserName-ts3sp Месяц назад

      if they’re looking in st pete i think its going to be rough… need it on the tampa side of the bay

  • @elsongs
    @elsongs Месяц назад +3

    Angel Stadium is a few months older than the Oakland Coliseum, making it the 4th oldest MLB ballpark. It opened at the beginning of the 1966 baseball season, whereas the Oakland Coliseum opened towards the end of the 1966 baseball season.

  • @BellaBellaElla
    @BellaBellaElla Месяц назад +1

    Where the Sox currently are is a site with more trains RIGHT THERE, and they have been at that intersection since 1910 and are a flagship AL team. The parking lots at Sox park take up more pace than the undeveloped land at the 78 in the south loop, they need to develop the area they are at, not move!!!

  • @marksousa8595
    @marksousa8595 Месяц назад +3

    What about the owners pay for their own toys? And use taxpayers money on Healthcare and education?

  • @BoulderCityBlues
    @BoulderCityBlues Месяц назад +3

    Other than Tampa Bay and Oakland no other team is going to relocate ..And the Oakland to Las Vegas relocation is still up in the air because of 3 lawsuits , Fishers lack of investors and the fact Ballys stock in sinking faster than the Titanic ..Manfred and greedy owners are killing the game and the fans are the ones who are paying the price ..

  • @geneseofootball1915
    @geneseofootball1915 6 дней назад +1

    Laughing at all the Cardinal fans throwing a hissy fit here

  • @Soulmodulation
    @Soulmodulation Месяц назад +8

    White Sox are eventually leaving for Charlotte imo. Its too perfect of a situation for Jerry to flee to: The AAA Knights stadium was built on a plot of land big enough for an mlb stadium, 13 fortune 500 companies for luxury box suites, large metro population, large TV market, and they want MLB baseball.

    • @blacksportsguru
      @blacksportsguru Месяц назад

      Charlotte doesnt Even support it's NFL or NBA teams. The white Sox are Nashville bound

    • @michaelleroy9281
      @michaelleroy9281 27 дней назад

      There's a thing of 24 out of 30 owners having to approve such a move leaving a city with large TV and radio revenue for a city that would hardly pay as much and where they have been for 124 years

    • @richardlittle1663
      @richardlittle1663 21 день назад

      White Sox should relocate to Indianapolis, Indiana where they would be the Indianapolis White Sox where they would stay in the American League Central Division where they would play at Victory Field stadium in Indianapolis, Indiana

  • @revan5293
    @revan5293 Месяц назад +4

    My dbacks can’t move.

  • @hamburglar83
    @hamburglar83 Месяц назад +2

    Also relocation means to a new region not just another city in the same metro….

  • @shawnokeefe1580
    @shawnokeefe1580 Месяц назад +2

    Hell will literally freeze over before the St Louis Cardinals move out of StLouis

  • @evanb0611
    @evanb0611 Месяц назад +2

    Brother the cardinals moving is ludicrous. Also Busch is only 18 years old

  • @scobo4743
    @scobo4743 Месяц назад +1

    All municipalites and state governments should collude and say no to all sports leagues' requests for public money and deals. Pay your own way!

  • @davidtosh7200
    @davidtosh7200 19 дней назад +2

    How about Miami Marlins? They also draw low attendance.

  • @Mr.Ed_Wayner
    @Mr.Ed_Wayner Месяц назад +1

    Nice sound effects. You look relaxed and having fun making videos.

  • @petertalsness3238
    @petertalsness3238 Месяц назад +1

    The Rays are foolish to remain in St. Pete at the Tropicana site. 🤦‍♂️

  • @bencaras5524
    @bencaras5524 Месяц назад +7

    I live in California. In my 50 years on this planet I have never met anyone from Chicago that is a fan of the White Sox; only the Cubs.

    • @michaelleroy9281
      @michaelleroy9281 Месяц назад +1

      You have one right here I went th Irough the near last minute move on June 30 1988 I remember listening to the late night coverage from Springfield on WBBM News radio 78

    • @alvizothegreat8096
      @alvizothegreat8096 Месяц назад +2

      Really, I'm from Chicago been to California and met many White Sox fan

    • @robertlee6781
      @robertlee6781 Месяц назад +2

      Sox fan that grew up on the North side of Chicago here.

    • @UserName-ts3sp
      @UserName-ts3sp Месяц назад

      they exist. but the cubs are more popular

  • @JayRoberts244
    @JayRoberts244 Месяц назад +1

    Implying the Cardinals are in danger of relocating is one of the absolute worst sports takes ever

  • @colinmac3144
    @colinmac3144 Месяц назад +1

    Absolutely zero chance the Cardinals leave

  • @albertpeterson5585
    @albertpeterson5585 Месяц назад +2

    ...the football Cardinals moved...

  • @user-jf4nj3ez2k
    @user-jf4nj3ez2k Месяц назад +3

    Only a couple of them might actually move out of the metropolitan area that they're already in.

  • @rons8079
    @rons8079 Месяц назад +5

    I wouldn't be too smug and confident that St Louis will always have the Cardinals to kick around. The city has a history of losing professional sports teams. Cases in point, in baseball, the Browns left for Baltimore and became the Orioles. In football, they lost the Cardinals to Arizona, the Rams went back to LA, and in basketball, the Hawks moved to Atlanta

    • @michaelleroy9281
      @michaelleroy9281 Месяц назад

      Speaking of Missouri Kansas City has lost the Kings in basketball and Scouts in hockey

    • @adzisme
      @adzisme 27 дней назад

      @@michaelleroy9281There is no way in hell Kansas will pay for new baseball or football stadiums.

  • @BeastieBoy1974
    @BeastieBoy1974 12 дней назад +1

    St. Louis Cardinals are going nowhere. However, you might want to add the Miami Marlins to this list.

  • @aidanbohr4617
    @aidanbohr4617 Месяц назад +2

    After KC with the Chiefs and Royals and now Chicago with the Bears, I strongly think we’re gonna see mass relocation before expansion. If Chicago won’t approve hundreds of millions for the Bears then they aren’t gonna do it for the Sox. Teams and owners are gonna take note of cities not giving in to their ridiculous demands

    • @americangiant1003
      @americangiant1003 Месяц назад

      Aidan I could be wrong but I don’t think the Bears will leave Chicagoland or even the state of Illinois entirely. The now on hold Arlington Heights proposal if the new Downtown Chicago retractable roof stadium plan fails is where the Bears might end up in the long term.
      As far as the White Sox, I can easily see them leave Illinois for good. Especially that money hungry Jerk White Sox/Bulls Majority Owner Jerry Reinsdorf (whom personally put most blame for both canceling the 1994 World Series and also ending premature the 1990 Bulls NBA Championship Dynasty)ending almost 125 years of a AL club in Chicago’s South Side.

  • @lmswentzeljr
    @lmswentzeljr Месяц назад +2

    Outside of the Cardinals, the other 6 its plausible they could all move, I would prefer these teams stay where they are at.

  • @jimough2441
    @jimough2441 Месяц назад +1

    The first thing you must understand, to discuss this issue is, the market conditions have changed. It is no longer a high priority for a large number of citizens to have a sports franchise. The only two teams that seem logical to move out of their current region are The A's and Rays. Both have had attendance problems for decades.

  • @ronavena
    @ronavena Месяц назад +1

    In the early 60s, Civic Center Redevelopment Corporation, spawned by the local chamber of commerce, built what became Busch II, which opened in 1966. A-B bought the stadium 16 years later. For Busch III, St. Louis City put together a financial plan where the only public dollars was apparently a loan from St. Louis County. Despite today’s economic times, this is now the first time the team is asking for some $500M in public money. A former St. Louisan, I think this is worth it to ensure the Cards stay in STL.

  • @richardsass5906
    @richardsass5906 Месяц назад +1

    The White Sox have to be high on the list. There is no way the city and state will give them the money they need.

  • @ucumari77
    @ucumari77 Месяц назад +22

    So tired of multi billionaire owners trying to hold cities hostage. How about funding education instead? What are owners going to do when they run out of cities willing to mortgage their cities future?

    • @redx1106
      @redx1106 Месяц назад +4

      Who cares about education kids these days don’t know history or geography

    • @mattcraig4601
      @mattcraig4601 Месяц назад +5

      Education needs to be reformed top to bottom and not have money thrown at it.

    • @davidlasdon457
      @davidlasdon457 Месяц назад +2

      Cities don't fund education. States do. Your assumption that every city in America needs more money for education is unlikely.

    • @James_Ford4815
      @James_Ford4815 Месяц назад +2

      I feel like a lot of these billion dollar deals are also skim off the top scams. No different than the trillion dollar GOV bills , no one is going to notice or care where the over budgeted money goes.

    • @Bk6346
      @Bk6346 Месяц назад

      That’s a red herring. If people really cared about education then increase property taxes to pay for it. But most Americans don’t want their taxes increase.

  • @savingyourselffromwallstre690
    @savingyourselffromwallstre690 Месяц назад +1

    All academic research shows public funding is a waste of taxpayers. Economic benefit never comes close to the cost.

  • @franciscoc905
    @franciscoc905 Месяц назад +2

    Dbacks stadium is in dire need of repairs and while I don’t like the grunge match going on, I rather keep them in Phoenix as the current location is perfect with the new renovations downtown

    • @HighpointerGeocacher
      @HighpointerGeocacher Месяц назад +2

      As a resident of the greater Phoenix area, I would prefer to see the Diamondbacks in Scottsdale instead of Phoenix.

  • @leaveittobaker
    @leaveittobaker Месяц назад +4

    Not thumbs down, Thumbs Up!! 😉 👍

  • @marchmaps
    @marchmaps Месяц назад +1

    Busch Stadium is just 18 years old. Yeah, they're asking for funding but there is ZERO relocation danger.

  • @UserName-ts3sp
    @UserName-ts3sp Месяц назад +1

    rays - i don’t think they leave florida. but they could end up in orlando.
    royals - wouldn’t be surprised if they (and the chiefs) jump over to the kansas side of the metro. the kansas side is growing quickly too.
    white sox - i think this is a relocation. with the bears situation, plus the cubs are the more popular team in the city…
    a’s - it’s unfortunate for the fans in oakland, but i don’t think a stadium happens. las vegas.
    cardinals - not happening.
    angels - i don’t think they leave southern california.
    diamondbacks - they’ll find somewhere. probably not downtown phoenix.

  • @mtverv
    @mtverv Месяц назад +2

    The only one relocating is Oakland and good on them for getting out of that dying city. With Expansion the last big thing Manfred wants to preside over before he retires that takes away 2 Prime Markets for any team to relocate to. Expansion is happening, not Relocation

  • @pringlized
    @pringlized 28 дней назад +1

    It's time that Congress steps in and says NO MORE TAX PAYER MONEY for sports teams, arenas and stadiums. Fund it yourself or fold. PERIOD! FULL STOP!

  • @albertpeterson5585
    @albertpeterson5585 Месяц назад +2

    ...why does the price of the stadiums sound like Jackie Mason is describing it?

  • @nikolaspaz8820
    @nikolaspaz8820 Месяц назад +2

    Here’s my predictions the Cardinals aren’t moving so I’m not including them
    Rays- I think St. Pete city council will approve the deal in June, just like every stadium deal there are always pros and cons but the pros have so many benefits not only is it a new stadium but the development is gonna include an African American museum, a hotel, more affordable housing units than original and retail and restaurants obviously the cons are that 45% of it will be paid with taxpayer money but I think St. Pete needs this especially with the amount of jobs it’ll create although I wish the Rays would just move to Tampa
    A’s- I still think Vegas is gonna happen but if the deal falls through I wouldn’t be shocked because this is John Fisher after all the guy is a clown and one of the worst owners in sports, I give it a 75% chance of it still happening and if it falls through no question Vegas will get an expansion team
    Royals- The Royals have 3 options and that is to negotiate with Jackson County again but with a better deal, move to the Kansas side or go to Clay County, it’s too early to tell what will happen but my opinion is that Kansas will build a new sports complex for both the Chiefs and the Royals and talks will begin in a few months a year
    White Sox- This is the team I’m most worried about because there’s no way Chicago is gonna pay 1.7 billion dollars in public money for a new stadium Jerry Reinsdorf can go screw himself with that deal, I really want the White Sox to stay in Chicago but by the time 2028 comes and their lease expires I think they move to Nashville or Charlotte but who knows this is very unpredictable but I don’t see a light at the end of the tunnel
    Angels- The Angels are never gonna be as popular as the Dodgers but they have a lot of history in LA I know the last 15 years it’s been bad especially not making the playoffs since 2011 and wasting Mike Trout and Shohei Ohtani but I don’t see the MLB allowing an LA team to move because LA and New York are the only two cities in North America that can have two sports teams in the same city I think the Angels will get a new stadium sometime at the end of the decade
    Diamondbacks- Other than the Cardinals being on here this is the stupidest one, Phoenix is the 10th largest metro area in the United States and it’s a great market, the DBacks are the only team in Phoenix to have a world championship and they have a decent fan base, Chase Field may be old and I know the lease is expiring soon but no way the DBacks are leaving Arizona I’m guessing that Chase Field will get a massive renovation project and it’ll be approved soon if not I can see a new ballpark as a possibility but the latter is more likely

  • @moonytheloony6516
    @moonytheloony6516 Месяц назад +2

    The Sox are so outta Chicago it's actually amusing more than it is tragic. Ultimately Illinois will have to choose a team, Bears vs White Sox with their public funding help....it will be the Bears and the NFL in a landslide....say hello to Salt Lake City for the Sox, where an already funded stadium awaits.

    • @watsonroadster3707
      @watsonroadster3707 Месяц назад

      Go back to Wrigley...

    • @tripleb1916
      @tripleb1916 Месяц назад

      Sox are not going to Utah

    • @michaelleroy9281
      @michaelleroy9281 27 дней назад

      24 out of 30 owners would have to approve a move from a move from the 3 rd largest city in the country and all the TV and radio revenue to whatever size market Salt Lake City is

  • @RobZelinka
    @RobZelinka Месяц назад +3

    It's a stretch to suggest the White Sox would leave Chicago, the 3rd largest TV market in the country. Their issue is they're fielding a bad team. The stadium being old is crazy. It's serviceable. If they want to leave for a market like Nashville, go ahead, even if they were to draw more there, the team won't be as profitable as it could be in Chicago. Similar case for the Angels. There's no way the Angels leave LA, the 2nd largest TV market in the country. Whether they're for sale or not has little bearing on this. Again, they're not going to leave that market for Charlotte, Nashville, Portland, etc.

    • @jeffreybelluomini5271
      @jeffreybelluomini5271 Месяц назад

      nobody cares about the sox in Chicago.. the Cubs rule that city with an iron fist. No chance Jerry gets money for a new stadium and if Nashville offers to build him one for free he would absolutely leave.

    • @americangiant1003
      @americangiant1003 Месяц назад

      Actually Rob this is not the year 1980 or even 2000. If current census data continues either Dallas or Houston or even both will be America’s 3rd and 4th largest city and or market by middle of this current 21st century at the latest.
      Don’t put anything past Jerry Reinsdorf. With his large role in both causing the 1994/‘95 MLB strike and ending the Bulls 1990 NBA championship dynasty(there are tons of books, news articles and video news clips confirming this) even at close to the century age himself, Reinsdorf is always out for making more money. Traditions and money be damn. 😡
      On that point, I am much more confident of the Angels staying in the LA region(even if they left Anaheim) than the White Sox staying in Chicago with Reinsdorf in charge.

    • @RobZelinka
      @RobZelinka Месяц назад +1

      If I had wheels and peddles, I might be a bicycle... That aside, I understand the point you are making. Both DFW and HOU will likely surpass Chicago as the 3rd largest metropolitan area in the US. That said, whether that happens this year or in 10 years, CHI will still be a major market, and a top3 TV market at that. I lived there during the 90's watched the Bulls dynasty. I would submit it would have ended sooner or later, maybe not the next year, but likely there after. All good things must come to an end sooner or later.
      The most likely reality is Jerry will sell the team as he is fastly approaching 90. It will only be then that we'll see what happens. No matter, when you field a poor team, it doesn't matter much where you are located, you will have problems drawing, selling hats, jerseys, etc. Lets say he does not sell the team, he'll leverage the city, and state of IL just like he did in years past.
      Being in a town like Nashville, Portland, Charlotte, versus being in a city like Chicago, NY, LA, etc. creates challenges for a team to draw.
      If you think those towns can draw more fans over a sustained period of time than a big city, so be it. I do not.

    • @jeffreybelluomini5271
      @jeffreybelluomini5271 Месяц назад

      @RobZelinka the sox would definitely have higher attendance in Nashville than they ever would in Chicago. The Cubs massively out draw them every year... No matter what the Sox do they will always be irrelevant in Chicago.

    • @michaelleroy9281
      @michaelleroy9281 27 дней назад +1

      Different Situation in 1988 than in 2024 the White Sox had a near finished stadium in St Petersburg ( the one the Rays are trying to get out of now) they don't have one to move to right now

  • @tonymeehan7859
    @tonymeehan7859 5 дней назад +1

    I'm fine if the Royals leave for Kansas City , Kansas. Just as long as it is in Kansas City period!

  • @specter_badguy9675
    @specter_badguy9675 Месяц назад +1

    Thanks for the video, I as a Cardinals fan needed a good chuckle (other then our shit offense) and saying the Cards might move is funny as hell

  • @Hogtownboy1
    @Hogtownboy1 Месяц назад +2

    Baseball is shrinking two teams will be gone by 2035

  • @dshap42
    @dshap42 Месяц назад +1

    Frank McCourt* is talking about building on the dodgers stadium parking lot, without approval or trying to work with the Dodgers. He still owns the other half (pain)

  • @nicksGLI
    @nicksGLI Месяц назад +2

    These teams need to know their place in HISTORY.. it's not about maximizing money.

    • @brodiebrazil
      @brodiebrazil  Месяц назад +2

      to them, it is

    • @rck4070
      @rck4070 Месяц назад

      the history of pro sports has always been about making money and lots of it.

  • @TheNotoriousJP
    @TheNotoriousJP Месяц назад +1

    White Sox are in trouble. Their best hope was to work with the Bears. With the two sides working separately, I can't see two different stadium tax bills passing. The chances of them beating the Bears for funds are nil. If its money or bust, they will be in Nashville or Charlotte.
    Like you said about the Royals, they're gonna just swap Kansas City's
    Rays if they don't this St. Pete deal done are in trouble. See them going to Orlando.
    Angels go to Long Beach if things dont work in Anaheim.
    Difference between the Diamondbacks and Coyotes is the DBacks have clout and stability in the region, their owner is generally liked, respected and appreciated. The Coyotes owners were almost all considered clowns and Leah from Phnx Hockey covered how poorly regarded the last was. Scottsdale is a very real area for the new park, but I'd be shocked if the team bids on that area of land Meurelo is planning to bid on. That would potentially alienate a demographic of their fan base. I know theres ample room at Salt River Fields where they hold Spring Training and their rookie league team to build their entertainment district that they've considered more than once. Big hold up is there's no form of public transportation that gets up there. Big plus with downtown is you can take the light rail and walk a block or two to get to games.
    As you alluded to, zero chance with the Cardinals. St. Louis and the state won't let that happen.

  • @ClintMcCollum
    @ClintMcCollum Месяц назад +2

    There may be "danger" of teams moving, but the MLB is the most stable league with its frabchises. In the last 50 years, only two teams have moved. Washington losing a team to Texas (1972) and and the Expos move to Washington in 2005.
    Of your 7 teams, Oakland is a done deal to Vegas. Tampa is the best bet of the others to move. I don't see Angels, Cardinals, White Sox or D'backs moving. I don't count the Royals move to the the Kansas side of KC as moving.
    The White Sox have been in relocation rumors a dozen times over the last 50 years. Could happen... but doubt it.

    • @thescott7539
      @thescott7539 Месяц назад +2

      It wasn't always rumors for the white sox. Tropicana Field was literally built for the White Sox. Then they backed out after they got their stadium deal for New Comiskey (at the very last minute). Later, the Giants used the Trop as leverage to get their new stadium.

  • @papabare1977
    @papabare1977 29 дней назад

    When I think of the "Old Guard" of MLB, I think of the Reds, Yankees, Red Sox, Tigers, Pirates, Cubs, as well as the Cardinals and White Sox. It would be so bizarre (and sad) to see either of those teams in a different city.

  • @user-kw1vs3et1d
    @user-kw1vs3et1d Месяц назад +2

    Fenway 1912 Wrigley 1914 Dodger Stadium 1962 Angel Stadium and Oakland Coliseum 1966

    • @michaelleroy9281
      @michaelleroy9281 15 дней назад

      The next oldest after all of those Kauffman Stadium 1973

  • @KenTheMan407
    @KenTheMan407 Месяц назад +3

    Why NBA teams don't have these issues

    • @brodiebrazil
      @brodiebrazil  Месяц назад +2

      seattle...

    • @KenTheMan407
      @KenTheMan407 Месяц назад

      @@brodiebrazil that was like 16 years , pre-financial crisis

    • @GFH-rp8or
      @GFH-rp8or Месяц назад

      In the last 50 years (not sure why the cut off is the financial crisis) --
      Buffalo to San Diego to LA
      New Orleans to Utah
      Kansas City to Sacramento
      Vancouver to Memphis
      Charlotte to New Orleans
      Seattle to OKC
      New Jersey to Brooklyn

  • @ronavena
    @ronavena Месяц назад +5

    Now a Chicagoland resident, I think the White Sox stay in Chicago, and I think the State and City will find a way to contribute public dollars so long as Reinsdorf puts up a substantial amount himself. Why? He’d face lots of backlash itself if he threatens to move the Sox elsewhere. Chicago sports fans would immediately take it out on him by boycotting his Chicago Bulls team. Manfred is wrong that major cities can get by with only one MLB team. Ever since 1901, Chicago has had at least two MLB teams, one for the South Side and one for the North. This is not like SF & Oakland, which had teams locate there from NYC & KC, respectively. Preserving the historic AL Chicago franchise is worth it for MLB.

    • @maywoodric
      @maywoodric Месяц назад +1

      Sox fan here. I think MLB will tell Reinsdorf , “ You will get the Nashville expansion franchise. The Sox will stay put. You sign over the Sox to us. “ if you refuse, the answer is No!!!!

    • @VolumedMusicMan
      @VolumedMusicMan Месяц назад +1

      I’m for the relocation of the White Sox near the West Loop. There is potential for more revenue and attendance .Right now the public isn’t keen on coughing up tax dollars. Jerry R better fork out the dollars. At the same time, Bears are going in for a stadium deal. I hope the White Sox are not squeezed out.

    • @michaelleroy9281
      @michaelleroy9281 15 дней назад

      You must be assuming Reinsdorf is still going to be around when the White Sox lease ends

    • @maywoodric
      @maywoodric 15 дней назад

      @@michaelleroy9281 He’s Mr. Burns. A hundred and something years old.

    • @rogerknueven7468
      @rogerknueven7468 3 дня назад

      White Sox do not draw fans like they should.There always in bottom fourth in league I can see them moving.Plus don't think to much of city so called leaders.

  • @RyanManke
    @RyanManke Месяц назад +2

    Time for Vancouver to get mlb

  • @macweilman535
    @macweilman535 Месяц назад

    Nats fan, surprised we were not on this list. The chance of us moving is close to zero, but with the Lerners looking to sell the team and the chaos around the MASN lawsuit it’s not the craziest thing I’ve ever heard

  • @graysondossett1558
    @graysondossett1558 Месяц назад +1

    Dude labeled cardinals as something to watch and clarified it the least likely to happen, yet half the comments are “the cardinals aren’t moving!!!!!!!” Like it’s not at all what he said. Alot of these situations will likely get solved, but should be kept watch of too. It doesn’t mean he thinks all these teams are moving.

  • @mr.belairpotato5895
    @mr.belairpotato5895 Месяц назад +1

    Omaha nebraska needs a baseball team. Give them the omaha white sox⚫️⚪️

  • @DaveySports98
    @DaveySports98 Месяц назад +1

    None of those are in serious danger except the White Sox & maybe Rays

  • @viperswhip
    @viperswhip Месяц назад +1

    I do not support any public funds for companies that are chasing profits, but I do agree that enough can make it happen. Every such transaction should require a public referendum, and it will never pass lol

  • @calabria1967
    @calabria1967 Месяц назад +1

    The Cardinals finished in last place for the third time in over 100 years - and still drew over 3 million people -- what are you smoking to report that they are a relocation candidate?

  • @TAO_345
    @TAO_345 29 дней назад +1

    The Rays and Sox are in serious trouble. I could see Nashville and Charlotte getting them

    • @michaelleroy9281
      @michaelleroy9281 15 дней назад

      One small formality 24 out of 30 owners would have to approve a move leaving Chicago sure as hell wouldn't be unanimous

    • @rogerknueven7468
      @rogerknueven7468 3 дня назад

      White sox are gone they suck .They don't draw win a ws once 😅every 50 yrs.

  • @maxkeebs4425
    @maxkeebs4425 Месяц назад +1

    Love your work Brodie, but for anyone who has been to Southern California, there is a lot of land...if you go East into the outskirts.

    • @James_Ford4815
      @James_Ford4815 Месяц назад

      Yea but no one is going to want to drive to Riverside for a MLB game. They barely even want to drive to Anaheim even though they live within 15 miles of the big A. I really don't know why Disney (who tells Anaheim city officials what to do) was so against Arte plan to build up around the stadium. Would of been cool to have a little Angels live district right next to the stadium.

    • @maxkeebs4425
      @maxkeebs4425 Месяц назад

      @@James_Ford4815 😂😂😂😂 Good point, but 49ers fans got over it and are making the 40+ mile trek to Santa Clara. For all we know, the Bears and/or the White Sox will have to do the same thing if they end up in Indiana. I think that's going to be the norm for franchises in all sports who want to keep their teams in their original metro area.

    • @xerneasrising2412
      @xerneasrising2412 Месяц назад +1

      Ducks are building OC Vibe - a shopping, entertainment, and sports district right across the street from the big A but somehow the Angels aren’t involved?

    • @brodiebrazil
      @brodiebrazil  Месяц назад +1

      I meant reasonably speaking, there's not

    • @maxkeebs4425
      @maxkeebs4425 Месяц назад

      @@brodiebrazil My homie, you're in the bay. Lol, if the owners in any region in this country want to stay in their metro in any sport, it'll be reasonable to them to build the stadium almost 50 miles away.
      I do agree with your point, though. Ideally, every stadia would be downtown or just on the outskirts of its named city (or major city of the region). Land costs downtown have skyrocketed, especially in Cali. Teams that already played downtown and need a new facility are lucky because they can just rebuild right where they are and not worry about ticking off any businesses that are already there.

  • @retailhiphop1991
    @retailhiphop1991 Месяц назад +1

    I stongly believe that the White Sox will end up in the suburbs.
    Cardinals moving is a joke.

  • @skiparkcityut
    @skiparkcityut Месяц назад +6

    Some of those cities economies made a lot more sense for MLB when back in the day then now and the economies are much worse now. Cities like Nashville and Salt Lake City are much younger and affluent and would be a better fit in modern times. Those cities are exploding in population and will continue to grow. States like Utah have increasing tax bases and revenue , it’s super easy for them to throw money at a pro team. A state like Missouri much harder to get funding

  • @georgehand
    @georgehand Месяц назад

    I can’t believe the Cardinals are here as I saw them & the Cubs in London last year in the green & gold and it was electric, now of course this year I’ll be in the red & white representing my new team the Phillies