Hey thanks. I really stressed over clipping out sections of jury instructions, but decided in the end that no one likes sitting through that, even when you're in the jury box.
Not surprised it was a not guilty with how the prosecutor was talking to the defendant. She was so over dramatic and asking the dumbest questions about if he was sad or not.
One thing I've realized watching trials, whether you're working for the state or the defendant, if you're not likeable to the jury or it looks as tho you're bullying witnesses, victims, or defendants, it doesn't go well.
The prosecutor got rather silly at times and I was glad when Judge Simpson told her to move on. The wife was a cheater and wanted her boyfriend to work in their business alongside her husband? What kind of thing is that to do? I believe the wife was the primary aggressor here. As soon as I heard the judge ask him how far it was he went to get away from her, that this was going to be not guilty. I think he said something about his beliefs and divorce and he at least, has grounds for divorce based on that. The defense attorney did a great job on this case.
This is a case where the Prosecutor couldn't see the forest because of the tree's. The Prosecutor seemed to feel like she had to maintain the narrative of the Defendant being a abuser through any way she could except through the evidence she had to work with. Her " oh really " cross examination of the Defendant was ludicrous.
This prosecutor quite thoroughly embarrassed herself with her entire line of questioning related to the “scholar” quip. She seemed to have been doing everything in her power to antagonize the defendant, in order to get a rise out of him, but only managed to annoy Judge Simpson and probably also the jury.
It was interesting to see these attorneys in a trial situation, after seeing them so often in simpler hearings. Prosecutor was strangely pushy and dramatic, maybe trying to get Del to react angrily. I was surprised that Ms. Pereny didn't start objecting. Judge Simpson had to jump in. Really glad this case worked out the way it did. Thanks for the video!
Wait. You are still married, and you want to bring your new lover on as an employee. Who is surprised that that idea escalated? Woman, that was so spiteful! I dislike my ex, and I wouldn't do THAT. 😮 Is the prosecutor new? Very poor job. Good grief, fighting about the pronouns of a dog. Ridiculous that THIS is the prosecutor's hill to stand on.
Right! Just goes to show that the husband isn't a violent person or she would have been too scared to dare bring the new boyfriend up like that. The audacity is wild.
Is there anyone in America that has not been divorced with at least one ex? Why are the failure rates so high? Is it just too easy to get married there? Or are people generally of low character and morals.
@@otadashi1570 its probably more to do with a false sense of entitlement instilled in them from early childhood. I think most people marry to get what they think their spouse can give them and with as little effort as possible on their part to give back to the marriage. In other words, they want what they want, when they want it, and how they want it - with little consideration for what the spouse may want or need. It's a selfishness that comes from being told *they* are special, above accountability and entitled to be a brat their whole lives. I believe it stems from younger Americans being given too much of everything and never having to earn any of it or struggle for anything. That's the downside to being the wealthiest nation on earth. We've bred some of the most ungrateful, unappreciative people on the planet. I've noticed even saying "thank you" either never comes to their mind or they simply can't say it. They often replace "thank you" with "way to go". SMH. Who would want to stay married to such a person? Especially if they're both like that? 😂😂😂
I watched this live yesterday. I was so relieved the jury found not guilty. I really think she lied to try to get an advantage in the divorce. I don't know why the prosecutor chose to pursue it.
The prosecutor is ridiculous, pushing hard on a sarcastic comment he made. The wife wasn't hurt at all. She was up in his face over absolutely nothing. I'm glad he didn't take a plea.
Over nothing?!? He used a non-human pronoun to refer to her friend's dog! Do you know how dehumanizing that is for the poor dog? It may never get over such a thing, and perhaps that's why it filed for divorce.
Thank you! One of my favorite channels. Listened to this trial while running around doing errands and chores. Appreciate your content. Great trial, great outcome.
I'm 2 minutes into the prosecutor being absolutely ridiculous to the defendant, and I can't stand her. She's not getting the answer she wants, so she's just badgering the shit out of him. I can't believe that this case was charged. Being sarcastic to your cheating wife isn't a crime, ma'am. Smh
This prosecutor is way too much. She literally spiked her pen on the podium and confidently switched it around with a pure GOTCHA look on her face while saying , "so by saying she should be a scholar and not being sincere you were arguing back. " news flash prosecutor.... if he is arguing back she is the aggressor. Watch Judge Simpsons face throughout...lol the prosecutor needs to learn to read the room.
No documentation of injuries, no video, no witness, and the complainant wasn't even the one to call the police. She changed her story twice to the authorities, plus she has an underlying agenda for having her husband charged and found guilty. Still, it all comes down to one person's unsubstantiated accusation against another. This case should never have been charged or gone to trial. What a colossal waste of everybody's time.
I remember this prosecutor from other trials/cases. She always acts like she's on tv, also she talks too darn slow, with pauses but will charge ahead. 🙄 Usually I speed past her. But because this is from Wolfie, I'll hang in there.😉💜
I miss prosecutors Jessica Blanch and Lindsey! I think that was her name! They both worked in the prosecutors office and were in front of Judge Simpson all of the time! Judge Simpson said a “goodbye” to Lyndsey on RUclips at ref end of the docket when she left for a promotion. Jessica Blanch seems to be in more high profile cases now. She I was currently in the Fareed Hajjar, 57 case who was charged with mutilation and disinterment of a dead body and concealing the death of an individual in connection with the death of 42-year-old Suzan Christian Barbosa Ferreira. The multiple bail hearings have been interesting and blanch has been a rockstar.
Its appaulling it went to trial, she followed him she attacked him! I know a person going thru this bs because 4 months after the incident when she had attacked him and he pushed her back in self defense he told her to stop contacting him and blocked her number! then she ran straight down the cops!
I can't figure out if the DA made this atty take this case or she truly believes dog's shouldn't be misgendered and no visible injuries on the "victim" should be proscuted.
This almost seems like a "Mock trial" the prosecutors need more trial experience, maybe they'd been more experienced if they would stop doing so many "Plea deals" .
Wolf, I am about to spam your comments. Was she upset Del assumed the dogs pronouns as it? I mean my sis has a pit named Blu and if you didn't know it was a girl, you would prolly say it.
She was nitpicking to instigate an argument in the hopes of just this scenario, in my opinion, in order to gain an advantage in their divorce proceedings. She and Boyfriend plotted this out.
Prosecutor definitely getting her ears wet. She up there inquiring checking questions off her list like do-do-dooo meanwhile things ain’t gonna go the way she expects….
I also didn't realize we have an accent, until I moved to another state for a few years.. we have a bit of a nasal accent. Not as much as Wisconsin or Minnesota, but it's there. Especially people in the U.P😂
The defendant’s attorney isn’t asking questions. She makes a statement. Pauses for a reply. Usually expecting a verbal agreement. If I was being questioned, I would expect questions. It’s very odd.
She's still a baby prosecutor.. she'll get the hang of it. They teach them to be dramatic.. most lawyers take drama and improv classes, especially if they are bland or shy.
It's funny that the prosecutor brings up time travel as her example of the only way to prove his guilt beyond ALL doubt, as opposed to reasonable doubt, because "we could all go back and watch it happen." I get what she means, of course, but it's kinda funny to think about getting the jury all together for a trip back in time so they can be bystanders to a crime, instead of... you know, stopping that crime from ever happening in the first place. But anyway, the point is... don't introduce time travel as a possibility in your story. Just... don't do that. 😏
I am super confused why didnt the defense object for relevance during the whole scholar statment on the da side why get so hung up on that they were arguing and more than likely it was a throw away comment. It made her argument weak at best lady was super in the wrong here the reason she didnt call the police is cause she knew she headbutted him shame on the police for taking him into custody
The defense attorney probably saw how ridiculous that argument was and how the prosecutor annoyed everyone including the jury. Why should she interrupt them then?
GRR! Kids around a dispensary is VERY dangerous, they get robbed often b/c it's a cash only biz.. Not sure if that is the same in other states (assume it is), but it is in MI. Until weed is legalized federally banks won't let them do other types of transactions. In fact someone that I know that smokes won't even go to weed shops anymore b/c hoodlums case the joint and will rob you outside knowing you got cash. They go back to the streets to buy it.
Ok, if she would have head butt him she'd have been in the hospital. Also, I'm sure SHE didn't call the police cause she was scared. Once she was home with her loving boyfriend and felt safe and told him what happened he made the call cause she was likely still shaken up. If she didn't want it turned in, she wouldn't be there testifying. Her boyfriend isn't there testifying cause he wasn't there at the time of the assault. His testimony would be hearsay and not allowed. Also, if the boyfriend "called police" cause he just didn't like them being around each other then why did it just happen to fall on the same day of a physical altercation. She was divorced and with him now. Nice try defense not plausible. I respect defense attorneys, would have liked to have been one but I just couldn't defend ppl accused of domestic violence against their partner or children or defend ppl accused of s*xual assault. I just couldn't do it. I love Judge Simpson!
Okay, was the dog or your brother Da misgendered, i can't hear and neither can CC. Judge, please make the witnesses scooch forward. Okay, so the fight was over a dog getting misgendered.. Okay, I already didn't like the lady. case closed. who among us haven't say it is so pretty or omg it breaks my heart when speaking about an animal?
This prosecutor has been watch DUI GUY CHANNEL 😂😂 shes completely trying for dramatic pause but miss times it completely 😂😂. She needs to study more. I also do need to say i feel like the state knew this wasn't gonna fly so they gave to a newbie to train with...maybe 😊😂
So a cheating woman wants to bring her new boyfriend into the business and she gets upset at a dog being referred to as "it"! What an utterly pathetic snowflake! I definitely believe that the "not guilty" verdict was correct!
Usually there are many ethnic women in his courtroom. So many awesome female (and male) defense attorneys of color. Apparently this was just a situation where his public defenders were caucasian.
@Aaaykaay I didn't know the judge was the one that fills the courtroom. How is that? Isn't the defendant given a court appointed attorney or hires one. And the judge doesn't have anything to do with the prosecutor selection. I'm asking since you say you're a lawyer. 🤔
![Quando Rondo - Grow Up [Official Music Video]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/8zFnCg3BO4Q/mqdefault.jpg)
Wow. Textbook example of how the judicial system should work. Thanks for sharing this 😍
Thanks for watching!
@@LoneWolfUsul wouldn't miss it❤️
Thank you for editing out the wasted time. The pacing was really good.
Hey thanks. I really stressed over clipping out sections of jury instructions, but decided in the end that no one likes sitting through that, even when you're in the jury box.
I’m a married female, and I don’t understand how this ended up in front of a jury. It’s ridiculous
Just crazy isn’t it
Not surprised it was a not guilty with how the prosecutor was talking to the defendant. She was so over dramatic and asking the dumbest questions about if he was sad or not.
She's watched too many court dramas 😂
@@AuntCathyPooh"COMMON SENSE."... TOO many ppl don't have later!!!! 🥴
One thing I've realized watching trials, whether you're working for the state or the defendant, if you're not likeable to the jury or it looks as tho you're bullying witnesses, victims, or defendants, it doesn't go well.
The prosecutor got rather silly at times and I was glad when Judge Simpson told her to move on. The wife was a cheater and wanted her boyfriend to work in their business alongside her husband? What kind of thing is that to do? I believe the wife was the primary aggressor here. As soon as I heard the judge ask him how far it was he went to get away from her, that this was going to be not guilty. I think he said something about his beliefs and divorce and he at least, has grounds for divorce based on that. The defense attorney did a great job on this case.
This is a case where the Prosecutor couldn't see the forest because of the tree's. The Prosecutor seemed to feel like she had to maintain the narrative of the Defendant being a abuser through any way she could except through the evidence she had to work with. Her " oh really " cross examination of the Defendant was ludicrous.
This prosecutor quite thoroughly embarrassed herself with her entire line of questioning related to the “scholar” quip. She seemed to have been doing everything in her power to antagonize the defendant, in order to get a rise out of him, but only managed to annoy Judge Simpson and probably also the jury.
She was trying way too hard 😵💫
It was interesting to see these attorneys in a trial situation, after seeing them so often in simpler hearings. Prosecutor was strangely pushy and dramatic, maybe trying to get Del to react angrily. I was surprised that Ms. Pereny didn't start objecting. Judge Simpson had to jump in. Really glad this case worked out the way it did. Thanks for the video!
She probably saw how the prosecutor annoyed the jury too, with that line of questioning and decided not to intervene with that.
Wait. You are still married, and you want to bring your new lover on as an employee. Who is surprised that that idea escalated? Woman, that was so spiteful! I dislike my ex, and I wouldn't do THAT. 😮
Is the prosecutor new? Very poor job.
Good grief, fighting about the pronouns of a dog. Ridiculous that THIS is the prosecutor's hill to stand on.
Right! Just goes to show that the husband isn't a violent person or she would have been too scared to dare bring the new boyfriend up like that. The audacity is wild.
I agree. Something a little off about a woman who would do that.
Is there anyone in America that has not been divorced with at least one ex? Why are the failure rates so high? Is it just too easy to get married there? Or are people generally of low character and morals.
@@otadashi1570 its probably more to do with a false sense of entitlement instilled in them from early childhood. I think most people marry to get what they think their spouse can give them and with as little effort as possible on their part to give back to the marriage. In other words, they want what they want, when they want it, and how they want it - with little consideration for what the spouse may want or need.
It's a selfishness that comes from being told *they* are special, above accountability and entitled to be a brat their whole lives.
I believe it stems from younger Americans being given too much of everything and never having to earn any of it or struggle for anything.
That's the downside to being the wealthiest nation on earth. We've bred some of the most ungrateful, unappreciative people on the planet.
I've noticed even saying "thank you" either never comes to their mind or they simply can't say it. They often replace "thank you" with "way to go". SMH.
Who would want to stay married to such a person? Especially if they're both like that? 😂😂😂
That was the first time i ever saw that type of jury verdict, but they got it right. i was reeing all thru Wolf's comments.
I watched this live yesterday. I was so relieved the jury found not guilty. I really think she lied to try to get an advantage in the divorce. I don't know why the prosecutor chose to pursue it.
It should have never been a court case. Just Stupid
The prosecutor is ridiculous, pushing hard on a sarcastic comment he made. The wife wasn't hurt at all. She was up in his face over absolutely nothing. I'm glad he didn't take a plea.
I agree. Stupid questions.🤪 going Too far in !!!
Over nothing?!? He used a non-human pronoun to refer to her friend's dog! Do you know how dehumanizing that is for the poor dog? It may never get over such a thing, and perhaps that's why it filed for divorce.
Thank you! One of my favorite channels. Listened to this trial while running around doing errands and chores. Appreciate your content. Great trial, great outcome.
Thank you for posting this Lone Wolf, I applauded when the verdict was read!
Just because he wanted to work things out doesn’t mean he’s not bothered.
Thanks for another good one Wolfie!
I'm 2 minutes into the prosecutor being absolutely ridiculous to the defendant, and I can't stand her. She's not getting the answer she wants, so she's just badgering the shit out of him. I can't believe that this case was charged. Being sarcastic to your cheating wife isn't a crime, ma'am. Smh
I wish they had a better mic (any mic?) on the witness stand. I sure hope the jury can hear testimony better than we can.
Did the prosecutor whine about feminist b.s. because she had no witnesses or because she thinks insulting a woman is a crime?
The prosecutor said he choked her in opening but back-pedaled to touched her in closing. Not strong.
This prosecutor is way too much. She literally spiked her pen on the podium and confidently switched it around with a pure GOTCHA look on her face while saying , "so by saying she should be a scholar and not being sincere you were arguing back. " news flash prosecutor.... if he is arguing back she is the aggressor. Watch Judge Simpsons face throughout...lol the prosecutor needs to learn to read the room.
Thank goodness I use Closed Caption otherwise I wouldn't be able the people on the witness stand.
Geez that attorney is such a pathetic ham. Laughable 😂
Correct verdict. There was nothing here, and her testimony and the prosecutor's conduct killed the case.
What case?
Hehehe.. cop is like thanks for the OT for 2 mins of testimony.
@LoneWolfUsul any idea of how long the jury deliberated? I thank you for a masterful edit of this trial.
The audio is so poor at witness stand. Did anyone catch answer to why she didn’t call the police?
No documentation of injuries, no video, no witness, and the complainant wasn't even the one to call the police. She changed her story twice to the authorities, plus she has an underlying agenda for having her husband charged and found guilty. Still, it all comes down to one person's unsubstantiated accusation against another.
This case should never have been charged or gone to trial. What a colossal waste of everybody's time.
I remember this prosecutor from other trials/cases. She always acts like she's on tv, also she talks too darn slow, with pauses but will charge ahead. 🙄 Usually I speed past her. But because this is from Wolfie, I'll hang in there.😉💜
She’s a Ham
I miss prosecutors Jessica Blanch and Lindsey! I think that was her name! They both worked in the prosecutors office and were in front of Judge Simpson all of the time! Judge Simpson said a “goodbye” to Lyndsey on RUclips at ref end of the docket when she left for a promotion. Jessica Blanch seems to be in more high profile cases now. She I was currently in the Fareed Hajjar, 57 case who was charged with mutilation and disinterment of a dead body and concealing the death of an individual in connection with the death of 42-year-old Suzan Christian Barbosa Ferreira. The multiple bail hearings have been interesting and blanch has been a rockstar.
I absolutely love this judge too bad they aren't all like him he doesn't just expect, but he demands respect 👏 👌 👍
Its appaulling it went to trial, she followed him she attacked him!
I know a person going thru this bs because 4 months after the incident when she had attacked him and he pushed her back in self defense he told her to stop contacting him and blocked her number! then she ran straight down the cops!
The icing on the cake was, "I wanted to bring my boyfriend into our business"'she's really delulu
Men in general are the better people 👍
I can't figure out if the DA made this atty take this case or she truly believes dog's shouldn't be misgendered and no visible injuries on the "victim" should be proscuted.
Not surprised at the not guilty verdict. It was definitely the right verdict. Great Job to the defense and the jury
This almost seems like a "Mock trial" the prosecutors need more trial experience, maybe they'd been more experienced if they would stop doing so many "Plea deals" .
WTF opening was that from Pros?
😂😂
I know it seems silly, but she's still a baby prosecutor.
I’m ok with the the opening, but what was that cross examination? She got way stuck on the scholar comment
I couldn't hear Michelle's testimony at all. Did she claim there was DV but didn't call the police?
Wolf, I am about to spam your comments. Was she upset Del assumed the dogs pronouns as it? I mean my sis has a pit named Blu and if you didn't know it was a girl, you would prolly say it.
I think she was itching for a fight and he wasn't giving it to her, so she wouldn't let it go and followed him. She was like a dog with a bone.
@@carolesmith4864 I don't know either, but right off the bat i was like.. um. I may need to see your woman card, whoops I lost it, lemme look.
She was nitpicking to instigate an argument in the hopes of just this scenario, in my opinion, in order to gain an advantage in their divorce proceedings. She and Boyfriend plotted this out.
@@AuntCathyPoohExactly! She and her new/old boyfriend were trying to set him up but he didn't take the bait.
These females give us all a bad name ,,,I hope he sues her for her lying
So many are like that.
I hope he uses this to get a good divorce settlement.
I HATE the audio in this court. I don't know if it's Simpson's mic picking up paper rustling or the mic from the podium. It's annoying.
Prosecutor definitely getting her ears wet. She up there inquiring checking questions off her list like do-do-dooo meanwhile things ain’t gonna go the way she expects….
She’s ridiculous
I have to remember when I am watching MI stuff I cant watch at 2x or 1.75x. 1.25x is max I can watch and understand. We speak quickly.
I know! I'm from MI too, and sometimes when I watch other states, I have to speed it up.. it feels like they're speaking in slow motion 😂
I also didn't realize we have an accent, until I moved to another state for a few years.. we have a bit of a nasal accent. Not as much as Wisconsin or Minnesota, but it's there. Especially people in the U.P😂
@@amandaadkins799 I just saw a video the other day about the 6 different southern dialects. There are prolly 12 northern ones?
@@ravinhud4979 something like that. But we don't notice them until we hear someone else with an accent. It's wild
Yeah! I also notice cases from Atlanta- people say “on” like “oh-ohn”. Or “dwaughter.” It’s strange.
WTF is the deal with this prosecutor? She's really reaching for a case here, and it's pathetic.
The defendant’s attorney isn’t asking questions. She makes a statement. Pauses for a reply. Usually expecting a verbal agreement. If I was being questioned, I would expect questions. It’s very odd.
Her job isn't to prove or disprove anything.. it's the prosecutor's burden to prove guilt.
@@amandaadkins799 Yes. I am commenting on her style of questioning. I’ve seen judges tell attorneys to ask in the form of a question.
Like him retreating into another room and her following and trying to shut a door to put up a barrier and maybe hurt her with no marks?
Absolutely terrible prosecutor. Choppy with rudeness.
She's still a baby prosecutor.. she'll get the hang of it. They teach them to be dramatic.. most lawyers take drama and improv classes, especially if they are bland or shy.
It's funny that the prosecutor brings up time travel as her example of the only way to prove his guilt beyond ALL doubt, as opposed to reasonable doubt, because "we could all go back and watch it happen." I get what she means, of course, but it's kinda funny to think about getting the jury all together for a trip back in time so they can be bystanders to a crime, instead of... you know, stopping that crime from ever happening in the first place. But anyway, the point is... don't introduce time travel as a possibility in your story. Just... don't do that. 😏
I am super confused why didnt the defense object for relevance during the whole scholar statment on the da side why get so hung up on that they were arguing and more than likely it was a throw away comment. It made her argument weak at best lady was super in the wrong here the reason she didnt call the police is cause she knew she headbutted him shame on the police for taking him into custody
The defense attorney probably saw how ridiculous that argument was and how the prosecutor annoyed everyone including the jury. Why should she interrupt them then?
Dog pronoun’s? Talk about *nagging* she’s a pro problem finder! 😂
I wonder if the dog was triggered? 😱
How is it not meant to be an insult to tell home the proper pronoun to use for a dog. How totally ridiculous of the petty woman.
I agree with the other comments on the poor quality of the audio from the witness stand. It's hard to hear the witnesses sometimes.
Is this a state pros? why did they even bother, I am sure there are so many other cases you can focus on.. I am guessing why this lacklaster DA stuff.
American justice system at work
Prosecutor was leading witness
Both sides presented weak arguments and the prosecution failed to prove much of anything. I couldn't convict under those circumstances either.
Why wasn't the boyfriend called in since he's the one who called the police?
I know we are taught we arnt supposed to, butttt has any guy here not been given a reason to.
🐾wonder if wife is trying to blacken husband character to gain full custody ( children) ?
GRR! Kids around a dispensary is VERY dangerous, they get robbed often b/c it's a cash only biz.. Not sure if that is the same in other states (assume it is), but it is in MI. Until weed is legalized federally banks won't let them do other types of transactions. In fact someone that I know that smokes won't even go to weed shops anymore b/c hoodlums case the joint and will rob you outside knowing you got cash. They go back to the streets to buy it.
Why is he so difficult to hear?
Did she say a dispensary business? I mean i know it's legal here, but certain types of people are around those.. starting to add up.
What is that supposed to mean?
@@lindasue263 Okay. Let me ask you what clientele do you think goes there? and what lurks around to rob you?
you just gave me a biz idea, thanks!
@@lindasue263Weed rustlers.
Ok, if she would have head butt him she'd have been in the hospital. Also, I'm sure SHE didn't call the police cause she was scared. Once she was home with her loving boyfriend and felt safe and told him what happened he made the call cause she was likely still shaken up. If she didn't want it turned in, she wouldn't be there testifying. Her boyfriend isn't there testifying cause he wasn't there at the time of the assault. His testimony would be hearsay and not allowed. Also, if the boyfriend "called police" cause he just didn't like them being around each other then why did it just happen to fall on the same day of a physical altercation. She was divorced and with him now. Nice try defense not plausible.
I respect defense attorneys, would have liked to have been one but I just couldn't defend ppl accused of domestic violence against their partner or children or defend ppl accused of s*xual assault. I just couldn't do it.
I love Judge Simpson!
How Mickey Mouse
Okay, was the dog or your brother Da misgendered, i can't hear and neither can CC. Judge, please make the witnesses scooch forward.
Okay, so the fight was over a dog getting misgendered.. Okay, I already didn't like the lady. case closed. who among us haven't say it is so pretty or omg it breaks my heart when speaking about an animal?
This prosecutor has been watch DUI GUY CHANNEL 😂😂 shes completely trying for dramatic pause but miss times it completely 😂😂. She needs to study more. I also do need to say i feel like the state knew this wasn't gonna fly so they gave to a newbie to train with...maybe 😊😂
Don’t post hour long videos unless you have enough material to keep it interesting
Don’t make a comment unless it is interesting.
So a cheating woman wants to bring her new boyfriend into the business and she gets upset at a dog being referred to as "it"!
What an utterly pathetic snowflake!
I definitely believe that the "not guilty" verdict was correct!
I think it is apparent they both had side pieces. LOL LOL LOL scholar in dog pronouns, I shouldn't laugh, that is prolly next.
I didn't see where she accused him of cheating, or where he said he was, but she admitted she was cheating.
@@carolesmith4864 Carole, i grew up as a tomboy, they were both throwing jabs.
Not one ethnic woman in the courtroom. I'm no longer support Simpson and or affiliate channels. I'm a lawyer btw. Geez.
Usually there are many ethnic women in his courtroom. So many awesome female (and male) defense attorneys of color. Apparently this was just a situation where his public defenders were caucasian.
Girl shut up
@Aaaykaay
I didn't know the judge was the one that fills the courtroom. How is that? Isn't the defendant given a court appointed attorney or hires one. And the judge doesn't have anything to do with the prosecutor selection. I'm asking since you say you're a lawyer. 🤔
Oh geez your one of the people that are contributing to the downfall of the United States of America.
@@jenniferrandolph4115Alleged lawyer. Seems doubtful given the lack of knowledge shown in the comment.