Can You Solve an 8x8 Rubik's Cube Like a 4x4... Like a 2x2?
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 30 дек 2020
- The cubers were so preoccupied with whether or not they could, that they didn't stop to think if they should.
Cube ► MoFang JiaoShi MF8 8x8: speedcubeshop.com/products/mo...
SpeedCubeShop ► speedcubeshop.com
Using the code "JPERM" supports my channel and also gives you a discount on your order.
Beginner:
2x2 Tutorial ► • Learn How to Solve a 2...
3x3 Tutorial ► • Learn How to Solve a R...
4x4 Tutorial ► • Learn How to Solve a 4...
5x5 Tutorial ► • Learn How to Solve a 5...
Special Tutorials:
3x3 One Handed ► • Rubik's Cube: How To S...
3x3 Blindfolded ► • (New) How to Solve the...
Advanced Tutorials:
2x2 ► • How to Get Fast at 2x2
3x3 ► • Beginner + CFOP Method
4x4 ► • How to Get Fast at 4x4
5x5+ ► • How to Get Fast at 5x5...
Facebook ► / jpermcubing
F2L Algs ► bit.ly/bestf2l
Patreon ► / jperm
Merch ► teespring.com/stores/jperm
Algorithm Trainer ► jperm.net
Written Tutorials ► jperm.net
Special thanks to these generous Patrons:
Erika Greggs, Omkar Sinha, Ziv Zhou, Eugene Chan, Cubing for Eternity, Melvin Mahaffey, sanjay, tim rossetti, Lv.99 Mastermind, Chris, kubesolver, Benson Giang, Dcs Banana, Asteroid, Ivan Marinkovic, Gregory Martin, Jan Strohbeck, KingParity, Antonio Bonessi, Ethan Lacasse, Will, Alex Lengacher, Shoaib, Klára Németh, Jill England, Vince Xiao, Anton Löfberg, Vihaan Krishna, Anwesh Borgohain, Mauro Caffaratto Grandes, Priyam Brahmkshatriya, Aaron Morales Dolich, Shayan Gupta, MELISSA J CLAGUE, Arav Trilokekar, Tobias, Albert Cinca, Bruhath B, Nakano Kyohei, Leszek Gawron, Chris Bonnello (Autistic Not Weird), Petrified, Benjamin Force, James Moore, Dmitri Shabes, Csaba Daday, Amay Saxena, Edan Maor, Takeshi Yanagita, Jane Qiao, Michael Mendoza, Philippe Schwartz, Derek Wong, Bob Brantner, Declan Manning, Vabio, Siddhant Sharma, Eric Soha, Michael P Deslippe, Hoang Nguyen, Stanley Wesley, Murtaza Azad, Fuzzy Sanders, Cubing Madness, Mark James, Spencer Gray, Tom Blanco, Nathan Last, John Adams, CubeRoot-Ruimin Yan, Jochen Bauer, RedKB, Fred Strauss, Danny Williams, Rick Lush, Letin, Chris Cobb, Martijn Schiedon, David Brown, Taco, Mike Sampson, Rob Peters
Music:
KC4K - Barracuda
sakura hz - chill
Mikel - Relic Song
Ikson - Horizon
Orca Vibes - Gypsy
Mikel - Route 30
Mikel - Dark World
ghostrifter official - sundown drive
kaleido - in-between
Grapes - I Dunno
4lienetic - Parachutes
Ikson - Walk
Chael - Sparks
Sparks by Chaël | / chael_music
Music promoted by www.free-stock-music.com
Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License
creativecommons.org/licenses/... 
Развлечения
I love how he explains step by step what he is doing as if someone would try to follow along on their 8x8
I can barely do a 5x5. I just don’t want to think
Well it would be kind of boring if he was doing it along with heavy breathing in the background wouldn’t it?
@@wakkle totally.
I'm watching and then like WTH????
Good idea imma grab my 8×8
Me: *Looks at my 8x8*
My 8x8: Don’t even think about it
A,re u Macgdonals bc Can i have a double cheeseburger big mac 10 chicken nugget ice cream oreosPizza chicken sa;ndwitch ketchup napkin french fryies fork tomato
@@siennaq5553 what
@@siennaq5553 tf?
@@TnlGC
Call a pest control over and say your attic is filled with bats. Fill it with baseball bats
@@siennaq5553 ok
I honestly think commutators count as intuitive. The first speedcubers in the early 80's who didn't have the luxury of online solutions on the internet all ended up discovering commutators, particularly for edges. Jeff Varasano, whose method for solving corners on 3x3 was taken from his 1982 book on solving the cube by Victor Ortega and applied to 2x2, has a video explaining how he reasoned out commutators intuitively to solve the cube when he was 14.
Well litterally all algorithms are intuitive
@@kyarumomochi5146 Maybe F2L and some OLLs since most OLLs are "destroy and rebuild" style algs. But many of the last layer algs, like ZBLL and other subsets were generated with cube explorer.
This kind of commutators? en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Commutator
@@asdfghyter Yes, exactly those
seeing the complex 8x8 become a 4x4 was so incredibly satisfying
when my brain sees random: *windows xp shutdown sound*
in the end, you technically turned it to a 1x1...
True....
so you have to solve it like one😂
turning 3x3 into a 1x1 SHOCKING
@@paper2222 wot how!?!?! black majiks
But everyone knows that once a one by one is scrambled it can't be solved.
Fun Fact: 24 out of the 28 minutes was used to turn the 8x8 into a 4x4.
xd
I mean, he already made a video on turning a 4x4 into a 2x2 so it makes sense that it would only take up 4 minutes of the video
Lol
Lol
Lol
Can you solve a 12x12, like a 6x6, like a 3x3...
Or alternatively a [18x18/27x27 like a] 9x9 like a 3x3, a 18x18 like a 6x6 like a 3x3
18:43 “I guess I’m showing you more tricks now”
“That’s...why I’m here.”
You're the ultimate motivation to make people hate big cubes.
He actually did this....
I didn’t believe he would actually do it
@@phase0400 yhea he actually did it
Yeah
I cant believe it
jperm has truly gone insane
Nah. I think it's much more than that
@@b-en8192 nahhh its not much more than that its much MUCH MORE CRAZY AMOUNT MORE then that i mean this guy is a man of focus commitment and sheer fricking will
@@furqaancoatwala382 I think we can do better
Let me get my demon book real quick...
@@b-en8192 mk
btw m8 do you have discord? ima add you if you do
@@furqaancoatwala382 I don't even know you
Jperm: starts by saying “we all know on the 3x3”
All the non cubers:
JPerm: because making a full layer is never a good idea. Me: rethinking my 3x3 life choices
"Now solve a 16x16 like an-"
*Gunshot*
*Thump*
@@dashinatingplayz6152 BUT NOT FOR ME *pulls gun on robber*
@@memysis7497 hol’ up, what?
@@dashinatingplayz6152 but not for me!
Solve a 32x32 like a 16x16 like a 8x8 like a 4x4 like a 2x2 like a 1x1
@@lukesgamingadventure8227 No
Imagine speedsolving with this method.
Time: 25 years
ሃቿነ
that's against wca regulation 2k6 "a competitor must not compete specting an intencional bad result".
@@Clopma Yeah. Ik
sub 10.
10 years
You’re an absolute beast! Insane how good you understand the principles of solving any cube.
28:14 that's the saddest 2x2 solve by a cuber i think I've ever seen
why?
This is official guys, J Perm has gone insane!
You need help jperm
That's not a original comement my guy
@@cornballs1750 your not original
@@cornballs1750 I wasn't looking at the other comments when I made this.
Ye
Very insane
I would die if this is my first 8x8 solve what a legend!
J perm in 5 years: solving a 64x64 like a 32x32 like a 16x16 like an 8x8 like a 4x4 like a 2x2
If you were thinking about the last layer from the beginning, would it make sense to completely avoid one color when making all your early 2x2 pieces?
He should do “I solved a 10 by 10 like a 5 by 5”
But I'm pretty sure JPerm does the reduction method so... 10x10 like 3x3?!
I think he sould solve a 16x16 like an 8x8 like a 4x4 like 2x2
@@JaydentheMathGuy haha that would be my next comment
@Starflight11 I was just joking about it. I also do not think there is a mass produced 16x16, because even numbered cubes are more difficult to make than uneven cubes. So yeah I totally agree with you.
10x10 like a 5x5 like a 2.5x2.5 like a 1.25x1.25 ???
I’m in awe that he can just look at the cube and know exactly what to do.
Who isn't
That's what happens when you're actually as smart as non-cubers think you are
@@tristanperciful6609 💀
It’s not as much about being smart as it is just experience. I’ve solved a lot of cubes and it’s not like I’m a genius, I am just familiar with the process.
lmao it's called commutators
Thank I for making this and the other similar video? They looked strenuous to do for you but hope you know just how satisfying it is to watch it come together and seeing the pieces get larger and larger. So good!
24:03 - He turns it into 4x4
27:43 - He turns it into 2x2
28:26 - He turns it into *1x1*
bruh spoilers
@@thecertifieddoctor Never thought of it that way
@@thecertifieddoctorthen don't read the comments
@@erner_wisal it's a joke bruh
@@thecertifieddoctor that is a bad joke
_Next: Solving a gigaminx by turning it into a giant megaminx_
The step before: Buy a Gigaminx and review it XD
isnt that already the solving method for it tho
@@arandomduckdog idk I only have a mega minx
That’s literally the method to solving it though 😂😂😂
@@cosimocubing3820 yes, i already pointed that out
The way this slowly comes together the way it does reminds me of how an AI solves a 1000/1000 Rubik’s cube that’s all algorithmic and definitely not a reverse scramble
“And if you care…”
“It’s not a reverse scramble. It’s all algorithmic.”
code bullet?
@@1unar_eclipse nope
@@faland0069 that one video thats like 25 pixels at 10 fps?
@@cactus2 If it's the one by aplzrg, yes.
18:42 And here I was always using a 20 move algorithm to turn faces, when there was an 8 move, intuitive way to do it.
Also gg you mad genius.
I love your dedication!
anyone noticed this is actually the LONGEST video he had made?
Yep
Yep
Yep
Now I dew
rip
When jperm finished there was an ad with people clapping 😂
Lol
Lol
Lol
Lol
Lol
"ok, you know what? I'm just gonna do it, I'm gonna put this yellow-green right here and you can't stop me"
cube: *pops*
"aaAA I'm being punished"
Well, technically you have now solved an 8x8! Good for you
“Depression shows itself it interesting ways”
Lol
Lol
Lmao
Lol
oh no
here before "solving a 12x12 like a 6x6 like a 3x3"
And the 3x3 stage is belt method.
@@NAM_137 or the side by side method
next: solving a 9x9 like a 3x3
@@NAM_137 OOF XD
oh my God, the dedication
you're a real one, Dylan
You just got straight into the video i love it
Imagine having to do parity when solving the 8×8 into a 4×4 just to have to do parity again once you are in the 4×4 stage 😅
Because the parity is with the individual pieces, preventing them from forming a 4x4.
The effect of lockdown on J Perm
when you reduce it it just feels so satisfying!
Watching it become a 2x2 was more satisfying than the actual solve
I was honestly really afraid that at the 2x2 stage, there would be some sort of parity that was normally impossible on 2x2...but I'm not sure if there is anything that could have happened.
Interestingly, no. There's no possible way to have a parity issue when reducing to a 2x2 because your corners will always be correct. So as long as you don't somehow twist a single corner, you'll end up in a solvable state once you're done reducing
u have funny number likes
@@cagyvolcano7016 its 70 now (i didnt like)
SOMEONE REMOVE A LIKE *OR ELSE*
Nope because corner twist parity can't happen naturally on big cubes so they will be built around the correct corners, and swapping 2 piece is possible on a 2 x 2, with a jperm, so it will still be solvable
Everyone is talking about jperm solving it but no one wish him a happy new year 😭
f
u
c
k
BirdBoard: *doesn’t wish j perm happy new year*
Next video turning a 16x16 into a 8x8 into a 4x4 into a 2x2
If a 32x32 ever gets made to work well imagine solving a 32x32 like a 16x16 like a 8x8 like a 4x4 like a 2x2.
QiYi Toys: *laughs in 64x64
@lucapreviati5833 moyu *laughs in 128x128*
@@Cool_duderoblox834 Gan:laughs in 256x256
@@vincentbangert6619 Rubix: *laughs in 512x512*
J-Perm: Solving an 8x8 like a 4x4 like a 2x2.
Also J-Perm: Forgets sune
He didn't forget sune, he forgot the cll case
@@tomasjosefpiano8902 yes but he couldlve done sune and then an pll alg from 3x3
@@marslion1 he wanted to do CLL not OLL and PLL
He decided to use beginner method but he remembered how to do sune
R U R' U R U2 R' btw
Jperm: is about to do something relatively interesting
15 second double unskippable ad: *ALLOW ME TO INTRODUCE MYSELF*
15:12
"I'm just gonna do it you can't stop me"
"Oh I know, but he can..."
*8x8 destroys itself*
nice 8x8 tutorial helped me a lot.
Happy New Years guys
Hopefully it doesn’t suck like 2020
It’s not 2021 for me yet but yea I hope it doesn’t suck as much as 2020
yeah lol
Happy new year to you too
I hope 2020 isn’t just a preview of 2021 (yes, I watched the Tingman live stream).
you too
Can we just appreciate the fact that he is doing it the intuitive way rather than just using commutators unless absolutely necessary!
Yeah, if I did this I would spam commutators
CONGRATULATIONS FOR 1M SUBS!!!! I WATCHED YOUR FIRST EVER VID TOO AND ITS THE BEST
28:18 he should’ve did partity alt for lols
P a r *t i t y*
Challenge: Do this, but on a 16x16
(If one ever comes out)
Just do it on a 32x32, the 16x16 part is already in that anyway...
Okay but what about a 2048x2048
@@arthurchase7716 you mean making a 2048x2048 a 1024x1024 and making that 1024x1024 a 512x512 and that 512x512 a 256x256 and that 256x256 a 128x128 and making that 128x128 a 64x64 and that 64x64 make it a 32x32 and make that 32x32 a 16x16 and making the 16x16 an 8x8 and making the 8x8 like a 4x4 and then a 2x2
@@ruru-rx9dh you gotta change your name before youtube sees how sexy it is
there is already a 16x16 cube
Feliks Zemdegs: uploads wr and good solves 20000 views
Jperm: uploads these experiments 1000000000 views
It is bc it is more entertaining
@@omashedpotatoes7120 u don’t say
You are a legend man 😎👍
This is an amazing video and looks like a fun challenge (in fact my 8x8 is in my profile picture). I know by tomorrow it would have been a year exactly since the video came out so this request is a bit late but I was wondering if for the next video in "the series" of these sorts of challenges you could solve a 12x12 like a 6x6 like a 3x3? I love your videos and have been watching them for quite a long time.
Just directly make it 3x3 tho
@@techietisdeadThat's not the point.
"What?! This works?!"
2 seconds later.
"Wow. That doesn't work."
Petition for jperm to make a cubing stories tier list(Asking for the 4th time)
Signed
YESB
Signed
Yeah boiisss
I'm not sure what's worse, the fact that I got entertained the whole time or the fact that I understood all your movements lol
If you do get a 12x12 you need to do both 4x4 and 3x3 for it
can we get a round of applause for this man who didn't say how long it took
2030: can you solve a 32x32 into a 16x16 into a 8x8 into a 4x4 into a 2x2?
he will do 32x32 to 16x16 to 8x8 to 4x4 to 2x2 to 1x1.
It will be 1 hour lol
@@talentedcuber it would take more.
@@CollinGonzalezTrant-kr3ky woah that is a lot of plastic
2048: Can you solve a 2048x2048 into a 1024x1024 into a 512x512 into a 256x256 into a 128x128 into a 64x64 into a 32x32 into a 16x16 into a 8x8 into a 4x4 into a 2x2?
This was infinitely entertaining
I have no clue what I’m watching but the emotions are funny.
“Wait, this works?? Wow! That doesn’t work!”
This takes a whole different type of commitment... holy shit
@@lawrencfgsdfg 16x16 to a 8x8 to 4x4 to a 2x2 to a 1x1 and when the 32x32 comes out put the 32x32 into the front
Just curious, how Long did it take you to solve it without the cut outs?
@J Perm, yeah how long DID it take you?
3 hours
2 hours 57 minutes
from an 8x8 to 4x4 to 2x2, all done for the beginners method
nailed it.
Jperm: "I'm using commutators and there's nothing you can do to stop me!"
8x8: *pops* "Are you sure about that?"
J Perm: I'm moving this Yellow-Green and nothing can stop me.
8-8 Rubix Cube: When will you learn that your actions have consequences?
Ah Im BeInG pUnIsHeD!
Rubix
Imagine the cube breaking down at the last move.
Top 10 saddest anime deaths
Top 10 moments before disaster
Top 10 catastrophes science can’t explain
Its same strategy that turns 5x5 or 4x4 into 3x3 but their edge alignments are very painful. But I would do this like first 5x5 then 3x3 by accounting edged as 2 invidual parts and 3 2x2 parts in center. But I dont know much about 2x2 though
Dude I would love to watch unedited puzzle solves. Especially like weird novelty ones (read: pyraminx etc), difficult ones, and lorge bois like this one.
When you try to do this on your own because you got one for Christmas but it took you 8 hours because you don’t know commutators
isnt that a potato shaped puzzle from the soviet union?
Ya
@@caithlyn1510 lmao
He posted the video three hours ago. You did not do it in 8 hours if the video is only online for about three hours. (I am not saing you couldn’t have done it before the video but that is unlikely)
@@gielvanderstraeten9356 dang bro you caught him lacking
"Can I solve a 16x16 like an 8x8 like a 4x4 like a 2x2?"
I think this video will come soon😂
12x12 like a 6x6 ,4x4 ,3x3 ,2x2
@@theneoncuber797 You can't turn a 3x3 into a 2x2 XD
short answer: NO
@@talentedcuber true
Well done 👍
thanks finishing with beginer method :]
No one:
Literally no one:
JPerm: Takes a random comment really seriously and makes a video on it
It do be true tho XD
oh this was maximum satisfaction. I think this has to be the pinacle of this series. what a statement to end the year with
J Perm in 2069: Can you solve a 128x128 like a 64x64 like a 32x32 like a 16x16 like a 8x8 like a 4x4 like a 2x2?
That is what I was asking for
Next Video:
Can you solve a 2x2 like a 1x1?
Nice, but that would just mean solving the 2x2
No one:
Literally no one:
Dylan:trying to end 2020 stupidly
😂
i agree this is one of the worst year
who is dylan
@@Cursed_Baljeet J prem is Dylan Wang
It's 4 am already 2021
I don't know how to solve a rubik's cube, but this was satisfying to watch
😃great video bro
Happy new year to j Perm , in india there is only 1 hour left to be 1 January 2021 ,happy new year to all of you 🔥🔥
Next: Can you solve a 10x10 like a 5x5?
can you solve a 5x5 like a 2.5x2.5
@@Xnoob545 1m iq
*pulls out 16x16*
What about a 9x9 made up like three 3x3? That would be fun to watch
There cant be 27x27 since that doesnt exist though
@@lailoutherand no no skkaskkw not like that, I mean, making a 9x9 into a 3x3. Not three units of 3x3.
Each 3 layers of the 9x9 being turned into one, so it would become a 3x3
What about a non-existent 16x16 made up like four 4x4? That would be fun to watch
@@ThemeCountry then the 4x4 into a 2x2
@@lailoutherand Just build one!
I feel like this was a tribute to ting man for solving the 13x13 stream today
yea
Yea
this is reminding me of when i need to do homework, especially the “now i dont need to think about this anymore” part
That was satisfying
imagine this being a speed solving method
The DNF method
Six and a half hours later
@@Froge4291 wait- is 8x8 a WCA cube
@@sumamalinivedantham7022 7x7 is the biggest according to WCA but, the joke here is: using a method that intentionally slow down your speed in solving any event is considered a felony according to the regulation and will result in your solve getting a DNF, and because OP mentioned using it as a speedsolving method I jokingly called it the "DNF method" because if you happen to solve an 8x8 or any cube for that matter with a simmilar method in a competition, your solve would get DNF-ed.
"Explaining a joke is like dissecting a frog. You understand it better, but the frog dies in the process"
HAPPY NEW YEAR JPERM!!!!!!
WHOS HERE IN 2021!!!!!!
love from canada.
Me
Me
“I never have to think about this ever again” *literally all of chat spamming for 16 x 16*
WHAT!? WOOOOAH! I literally thought of this last night without any knowledge of this video at all.
Jperm has gone officially insane.
Next video: solving a 16x16 into an 8x8, into a 4x4, and into a 2x2!
Show some mercy 😂
I can solve an 8x8 in the normal way, but the way you manipulate cubies into place in this solve is a total mystery to me! :)
24:05 when J Perm finally turns it to a 4 by 4
Now I don't own a 8×8×8, but I do own a 4×4×4 which sometimes I will _scramble_ like a 3x3×3 (outer layers and 2 middle layers) and then as a 2×2×2 and then solve it in reverse order.
Or scramble it as a 2×2×2 first, then as a 3×3×3 and solve it in reverse order. Pretty fun challenge!
this has been extremely satisfying to watch!