I am very glad to see the preciseness, clarity, and evenness in your playing in these studies. You play them most beautifully and almost perfectly. I heard other recording and they usually take a much faster tempo which kind of drive most students away when they heard them for the first time. Maybe this is what Carl Czerny intended (Crochet = 144 or faster).
Ricordo quando studiavo tutta l' op. 299 ; erano però un po' più veloci come li suonavo. In questo modo sono preparatori alla velocità. Li ho insegnati a suonare a 3 studenti di pianoforte. Dopo ho dovuto abbandonare perché non avevo più tempo.
Not entirely. Some parts involve you doing different things. Your hands may be doing chromatic scales at different points of the keyboard, so they're not exactly mirroring each other, like 43:17 and 44:13. Or like 43:46, where the hands are doing different things. The part at 43:31 isn't exactly easy either (at least, the way my Peters Edition's fingerings are)
I don't see why people consider the Op. 299 ones easy. I found the Op. 740 ones easier. The Op. 299 ones require more engagement of the fingers. The Op. 299 ones seem easy, but you have to actually engage the muscles in the hands to play them properly. Otherwise, yeah, they'll seem easy, and you can learn the entire book and gain absolutely nothing from it. I've moved on from these, I'm just saying, going through Op. 299 and Op. 740, this was one of the tougher ones to learn. But I play it every day now.
It's a quite correct version, not particularly fast. The instrument is not very nice, but it's naïve to tell that it deals with an electric piano and that the recording was programming has been accelerated. People saying that show they don't know a lot about piano playing or piano sound.If you want to listen to real velocity check out this link: m.ruclips.net/video/_cGBueqTEuU/видео.html which approaches quite a little bit closer to Czerny's own tempo indications
Daniel Jiang 15 years ago I remembered that my piano's teacher had played exercise no. 4 Cherny 40 to that speed. I didn't believe to my ears and my eyes!!!
Very nice, very neat, but in my opinion, too mechanical. Certainly, the beauty of the music can be percieved by an attentive, unbiased, listener, yet even Czerny has to be played with some inspiration and more expressivity. Or perhaps the real performer is a computer? Can a computer 'feel׳ the expressive meaning of harmonic progressins and structures?
I am very glad to see the preciseness, clarity, and evenness in your playing in these studies. You play them most beautifully and almost perfectly. I heard other recording and they usually take a much faster tempo which kind of drive most students away when they heard them for the first time. Maybe this is what Carl Czerny intended (Crochet = 144 or faster).
Molte grazie per questa splendida collezione di Etudes finemente suonato.
Don't matter if it was programed or not. It's demonstrating how Czerny should sound. Wish I could play half that speed and half that clean.
You might as well play more speedy and clean!
+LifeCraft Czerny, Berens and Cramer is the best school for piano speed!
Apostolos Apostolidis is that a actual school or study series?
Bobby Smith music books with study series!
Excuse me. Please, could you tell me what do you mean with ''Don´t matter if it was programed or not''?
VERY RELAXED AND CLEAN PLAYING!!! =)
Thanks for uploading!
Complimenti, una bella esecuzione!
Suono pulito, fluido e scorrevole
How can you play so precisely and so even at the same time!?
cus its midi
@@athyh377 and you are a terrible person for being so blatantly rude. Can't handle the truth I guess.
@@athyh377 very poor manners if that is supposed to be a joke. Nothing funny about it at all.
Excellent recording. So clear and even. Fast, but not too fast. Sounds perfect to me!
This was amazing! I wish I could play it even half as good/fast! I love Czerny! Good job! :)
View my channel, i love music of czerny.
Enjoyed listening
2:16 6:48 14:38 18:11 27:10 31:33 36:57 39:15 48:23
Bellissima e pulita esecuzione! Complimenti!
12:30 super
Thanks.
Good job
Great.
WOW! it's good!
Ricordo quando studiavo tutta l' op. 299 ; erano però
un po' più veloci come li suonavo. In questo modo sono preparatori alla velocità.
Li ho insegnati a suonare a 3 studenti di pianoforte. Dopo ho dovuto abbandonare perché non avevo più tempo.
42:44
Probably the hardest one in the book.
Not entirely. Some parts involve you doing different things. Your hands may be doing chromatic scales at different points of the keyboard, so they're not exactly mirroring each other, like 43:17 and 44:13. Or like 43:46, where the hands are doing different things. The part at 43:31 isn't exactly easy either (at least, the way my Peters Edition's fingerings are)
I don't see why people consider the Op. 299 ones easy. I found the Op. 740 ones easier. The Op. 299 ones require more engagement of the fingers. The Op. 299 ones seem easy, but you have to actually engage the muscles in the hands to play them properly. Otherwise, yeah, they'll seem easy, and you can learn the entire book and gain absolutely nothing from it.
I've moved on from these, I'm just saying, going through Op. 299 and Op. 740, this was one of the tougher ones to learn. But I play it every day now.
@@mario54671 Op.365 Is very Hard
My favorite music is 35:07
Awesome playing
Wow,helpful!
Perfect speed for this type of music 🎼 🎶🎹
i like it
Sounds like it was programmed, rather than played on a grand?
AlfaAxel I think it is played on digital piano.
It's MIDI. Manual playing can't have such exact timings.
No es un midi. Rino Nicolosi played piano digital Yamaha,,,,,,
48:22 39
49:58 40
It's a quite correct version, not particularly fast. The instrument is not very nice, but it's naïve to tell that it deals with an electric piano and that the recording was programming has been accelerated. People saying that show they don't know a lot about piano playing or piano sound.If you want to listen to real velocity check out this link: m.ruclips.net/video/_cGBueqTEuU/видео.html which approaches quite a little bit closer to Czerny's own tempo indications
me encanta ;)
Well spotted. I thought I was the only one who noticed it.
44:41 - 37
I like nos 1,5,8,11,23,24,37. No 26 just sounds plain awful and weird (to me at least!)🧐🤪
Wonderful, just perfect... To play them with an even light touch like this is precisely the point of these studies
Is this step recorded or quantized. Sound machine made, like all notes played the exact same touch and without depth or emotion...... Or what?
15 - 17:01
Naaaaassss
NEW FEELING EVERY DAY!!!
33:40 nr.27
😲😲
21:52
Благодарю! Кто исполняет?
Sounds like Ol' far west saloon piano playing
23:12
On my copy, the tempo of the first piece reads (minim=108). I have no idea how to play at that speed.
Czerny probably used a different metronome. Or maybe not.
Daniel Jiang 15 years ago I remembered that my piano's teacher had played exercise no. 4 Cherny 40 to that speed. I didn't believe to my ears and my eyes!!!
+Apostolos Apostolidis,wowee !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
+Kenny 劉健聰 Repetition is key; trust me, it's doable!
+Daniel Jiang Pianos back in Czerny's day also had a MUCH lighter action than modern pianos, too.
No 9 8:25
Do you have the audio files? I would love to have them! Crisp clean performance!
잘친다
잘한다
you are great
Haha. He is not great but good. Hi wake up dude.
Victoria Wen Xie Tay
H
40 etude: 49:58
😲😲😲😲😲×10000000000000000000000000000
you play on a electric piano !! , easy to accelerate the recording.... no ?
№14 - 16:19
wow
12:20 no 11
Isto é MIDI!
Tu cerebro es un midi,,,,,no puedes reconocer ni el toque de un piano de un midi....
0:05
0:43
1:28
2:16
4:24
are you trying to do a speed run or something lol : D
49:58
#4 2:15
#5 2:46
Very clean playing but no dynamic variety.
la velocidad de todos estos estudios mucho más rápida!!!!
Perché??????
WE WANT THE SCORE!
No 28. 34cu Dәqiqә
MIDI. : )
indeed
♣
The sound is like MP3, sorry but I don't like........
Not like MP3, but like MIDI.
Very nice, very neat, but in my opinion, too mechanical. Certainly, the beauty of the music can be percieved by an attentive, unbiased, listener, yet even Czerny has to be played with some inspiration and more expressivity. Or perhaps the real performer is a computer? Can a computer 'feel׳ the expressive meaning of harmonic progressins and structures?
frumooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooosssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss
Meh
so slow...
not so slow , just slow enough AND CLEAN, all that fastness ends being boring, just like a photo in high resolution, makes you long for a blurr.
17:52
21:03
18:00