00:00 Intro 06:46 David-CA | Removing Religious Teaching From Society 28:29 Sean-TX | Cannibals of Lanciano 47:52 Ivan-CA | Crossing The Non-Belief Threshold 58:52 Joshua-(USA) | Made By Jesus On Every Piece Of Matter 1:18:46 Mike-WA | Amino Acids Can't Self Assemble 1:28:19 Benjamin-AL | Defending Slavery Again 1:43:12 Steve-NE | Arguing For Octopus Rights 2:05:26 Jimmy-NY | Why Don't You Believe in God? 2:30:32 Billy-TX | Observer Effect And The Supernatural 2:51:38 Mike-WA | God Did Not Create A Lousy World
I’ll give 56 verses on just one topic INCEST that’s a true contradictions that you can’t circumvent or loophole and squeeze your way out of them by saying god wrote a book as a aligorical joke or whatever they claim . There are 2 main issues but multiple verses that say INCEST is an abomination and shall require punishment. Noah’s ark tale and Adam and Eve tale
This was the best exp show ever!!!! It was the first show in a long time that I was able to watch straight through without getting bored. I know it was pure luck but the variety of callers was just right.
Forrest, your original response to Dave is great! I thank my kids every time they correct me. Hopefully, that teaches them that people in authority can be wrong, and it's their duty to stand up for reality.
JMike is one of my favorite atheist show hosts, but it would better serve his communication with callers if he "spoke to his audience" a bit more. Because of his intelligence and knowledge, there are times where they don't track what he's saying. Sean - TX is a great example. There were a series of questions starting around the 38 or so minute mark where he didn't grasp what JMike was asking, but instead of rephrasing he asked them in the exact same way. The questions weren't that high-brow really, but the call would've gone smoother if JMike had met the caller where's he at.
Completely agree. He's so sharp with his logical perspectives, but he gets too bogged down by his terminology. He's a great thinker, but not so great a teacher. He'd be so much more effective if he could communicate the same ideas in terms that the everyman who doesn't deal with philosophy every day can understand.
Yeah definitely agree. I’ve listened to thousands of hours of these shows so I know most arguments but I was having trouble following what he meant by “the father affirming the son”. I know what all those words mean but to the average person it’s doesn’t have a clear meaning.
Warning label: All characters and situations depicted herein are fictitious. Any resemblance to actual persons or events is entirely coincidental, accidental, or psychological.
You handled that Jimmy caller masterfully, in a way that was both excoriating and humane, revealing the monstrousness of his no doubt deeply held beliefs and exposing his terrified reliance on preaching rather than genuinely advocating for Christianity. You actually managed to make me feel sorry for him, I must confess I often struggle to empathize with proselytizing people due to how blatantly dishonest and disengaged from normal social interaction such people are.
I agree with SR when he said he needs to stop telling bad callers to call back in. Sadly, he later went against his own advice and told several bad callers to call back in.
@@scotthoenle7693 they could've spent an hour on that one call, and it may have been worth it, but they might not have gotten to some of the others then.
They’ve ran this show since 1997, they probably hear the same theist script countless times. To the point, where it’s so easily refutable that they usually just stop the script
The Trinity breaks the basic principles of equality and logic. The basic logic of the trinity All A's = C, B's= C, therefore A = B But A says he is C, but not B And B says he C, but is not A A=the Father B=the Son C= God When examining the statement "A = C but not B, B = C but not A" purely from a logical perspective, without any theological or Christian context, we encounter an apparent logical contradiction. Here’s why: 1. **Equality in Logic:** - If we say "A = C," we are asserting that A and C are the same or equivalent in some way. - Similarly, "B = C" asserts that B and C are the same or equivalent. - In classical logic, if A equals C and B equals C, then A must equal B (transitive property of equality). 2. **The Contradiction:** - The statement "A = C but not B" implies that A and C are equivalent, but A is not equivalent to B. - The statement "B = C but not A" similarly implies that B and C are equivalent, but B is not equivalent to A. - These statements are contradictory because, under the transitive property of equality, if A = C and B = C, then it must follow that A = B. ### Pure Logical Analysis: - **Transitive Property:** In classical logic, if A = C and B = C, then A must equal B. Denying this would break the basic principles of equality and logic. - **Contradiction:** Saying "A = C but not B" and "B = C but not A" simultaneously introduces a contradiction, as it suggests that A and B are both equal to C but somehow not equal to each other, which defies the transitive property. ### Possible Logical Interpretations: To make logical sense of the statements, you might need to reinterpret the symbols or introduce additional qualifications: 1. **Different Contexts or Perspectives:** - If "A = C" in one context or under certain conditions and "B = C" in another, but A and B do not overlap in those contexts, you might avoid a direct contradiction. However, this approach introduces ambiguity rather than clarity. 2. **Different Types of Equality:** - You could argue that "A = C" and "B = C" represent different kinds of equivalence (e.g., A and C share one characteristic, while B and C share another). But in pure logical terms, the symbol "=" usually denotes the same type of equality or equivalence, so this would require altering the meaning of the equals sign. ### Conclusion: Without reinterpreting the statements, **there is no straightforward logical way** to claim that "A = C but not B" and "B = C but not A" without running into a contradiction. The transitive property of equality demands that if A equals C and B equals C, then A must equal B. Therefore, in pure logical terms, the statements are contradictory and cannot be true simultaneously. Therefore God cannot be both the Father & the Son. Christianity says the father is God, the Son is God, but at the same time God is not the Father & Son. We are trillions of cells, but one being & person. We cannot say each cell together are one being but separate persons. If they are separate persons then they are separate beings. So the biggest contradiction in the bible is God.
If you read the fine-fine-fine-fine print, youll see that; and i quote. "We are not responsible for the choices made under our discretion or ordered here in our book, since these claims are so outlandish that no one should take them seriously"
On the whole 'tree of the knowledge of and good and evil' thing, I gotta say it annoys me that whenever that story is brought up, it's always that 'yaweh didn't need to put the tree next to Adam and Eve' . Should that instead be 'yaweh shouldn't even need to have such a tree at all"??. Presumably, he already knows the difference, so the tree isn't for him, and he never intended for Adam and Eve to know the difference, so why create the bleeping tree in the first place?? Or perhaps yaweh does need the tree after all because it seems that if anyone needs to know the difference between good and evil, it's yaweh himself. In the OT, he is almost always embodying evil, but very seldom embodies good
WHOA! The way Sean is explaining the "eating the body of Christ" ritual sounds eerily similar to tribal warriors eating the flesh of their defeated enemies to gain their strength & power! 😲 Yet Christian churches send missionaries to convert these "jungle savages"! WTF kind of ironic hypocrisy is this? 🤣Talk about the blind leading the blind!
Warning label God forgot to include: This book is a work of fiction and should not be regarded as a reliable guide to science, history, or moral behavior.
Someone wrote in one of these "...whenever I'm in a hotel, I take the Gideon bible out of the nightstand...I flip to "in the beginning," scratch it out and write, "Once upon a time," Fuck I died when i read that. I'm laughing now as i pass it on
3:08:54 also, you have an infinite amount of recordings, with all kinds of outcomes for the game, and you choose the recording where you know the team loses.
I have so much respect for JMike. I've always liked him. But I can never understand what he's talking about. I normally don't have much sympathy for theist callers. But when they're having trouble understanding JMike's words, I do empathize. Love you man. No idea what you're ever trying to say.
JMike could definitely work a little harder on dumbing it down. I like it when he can show he’s better at using big words than someone else who’s just trying to sound impressive, but I fall asleep when I hear a six-syllable word from a host.
@@brucebaker810Go to the video and sort the comments by newest. You can still see it that way. Just RUclips's weird semi-censorship. Anyway, my home state of Georgia has a 50% higher rate of inc*st than my current state of New Mexico. And within NM, I couldn't find stats, but I really doubt if Albuquerque is the inc*st capital; that will probably be someplace like Española or Grants if I had to guess. And now all that is in my search history; I should probably learn to just shut up sometimes, lol.
During the call from Jimmy from NY something that has been playing around at the edges of my currently 70 year old mind came home hard. I understand that when I stop that's it. There is no afterlife that so far can be proven to me even if there is some unproven basis for one. With that I've started wishing that for me to believe wouldn't be just me going with Pascal's wager. I still know that there is little or no truth to any idea of an after life no matter how comforting such a belief would be to someone well into the last half of life. And no, I don't want anyone to come along with some words that would provide false comfort. OTOH, it would be nice to know all there is to know about the universe just because it would be nice.
The threat of Hell presented me with a question. Satan is supposedly the enemy of God. Rebelled. Says he isn't going to be God's servant. But then Christians say he is in charge of Hell to punish the sinners God sends there. My question is: why would the guy who doesn't want to serve God work for God for eternity doing His dirty work? Wouldn't it be a funny FU for Satan to welcome his fellow rebels and free thinkers with their favorite snacks and beverage and show them all a good time? Satan wins the day with bringing logic and knowledge to humanity. Being the very light of reason. Threats, torture, pain, killing, and might equals right is God's gig.
Exactly, I always thought about the proposition of lucifer running the hell hotel why would he be in the service of god, as in “I’D RATHER REIGN IN HELL THAN SERVE IN HEAVAN.” evidently logic and faith dont mix..
Exactly! Theists feel the universe owes them an explanation, it certainly doesn't. The thought of ceasing to exist is too much for them. They have predetermined there has to be an afterlife or they can't enjoy this life. It must be a comfort thing. I remember a Christian saying 'there has to be an afterlife, this can't be it'. That sounds to me like someone who is taking their life for granted, the life they know they get. One saying I'll never forget was when I heard for the first time 'life is not a rehearsal, this is it!!' it's so sad that theists see an afterlife as what its all about. Talk about taking life for granted!
Its a pretty understandable misconception. The human brain is hardwired to see patterns, and for our survival, large events have mostly been from large issues.(social and natural). So when they connect "life" being all these systems, they assume that it must be from something equally as big. Its one of the early documented things that the bible shows how its fictional, the reason why "old" gods used to be angry and make mistakes was to excuse this, and ambrhamic lore dropped that and excused humans are the problem.
I have a theory that all the "Made by Jesus" labels on everything in the universe were put there by a Shinto wood spirit whose StickerMe order was misprinted and she said "screw it, I'll take the labels if you give me a discount on the order". She is who we should be worshipping, in spite of the mixup.
What's a warning label God forgot to make? There should have been a warning from God that says "I'm not actually omnipotent, or all-knowing, or even good, despite the claims in the Bible that I am those things."
He was also the one that berated and was absolutely owned by Genevieve and Katy in Talk Heathen. I was thinking he was managing to remain respectful this time, but he lost his cool at the end. Definitely anger problems in this one
THANK YOU JMIKE FOR DEFENDING PINEAPPLE ON PIZZA. Everyone else can take their chickey nuggeys w/ ketchup eating ash pallet and let those who enjoy a complex flavor mash like, oh idk, sweet and savory, do so in peace.
Where in the bible does it say you can't put pineapple on pizza?, I know you not allowed to cook a baby goat in its mothers milk, that's so important its even the 10th commandment.[seconds & permanent set] , cant eat Bats because they are unclean birds...but nothing about pineapple on pizza... Just NO rabbit & pineapple on pizza, rabbits are unclean because they chew the cud. And Ham & pineapple obviously a no no, because pigs have the wrong feet,but I think that is juat because God wanted all the bacon for himself. There is something divine about bacon & cheese.
For many people "There has to be something." For me. There is much we do NOT know YET. But I do not expect a Supernatural something among what we don't yet know.
Joshua, put down the script! I get so pissed with callers who clearly stick to their apologist rhetoric instead of listening and having actual discussions...
32:00 If the wafer enters the mouth, gets soaked in saliva, the digestion has begun. Carbohydrates are breaking down, right? What else of a wafer gets digested before we get to the stomach? Where does the switch-to-flesh occur?
I think when he took Tour's side, Mike from WA lost me and then he called Forrest a "poop". 'Oh my glob' the calls where they don't want a conversation and just want to preach and tell people how poopy they are I just don't care. There were some great calls too. After hearing the question "Is it ever OK to own a human being?", anyone who says "well...." doesn't have an argument.
Mike's call reminds me of my own invented saying, namely: Almost all of us know almost nothing about almost everything. So keep reading ! Keep looking! Keep learning!
Billy, dark matter and dark energy ARE both detectable. We detect their effects on galaxies/stars. With dark matter, we see how it holds each galaxy together and with dark energy, we see how it’s accelerating galaxies away from each other. But that’s ALL we can detect from it. We’re in the “dark” about everything else with them.
The fact that the natural laws are pretty strict within certain perimeters points to naturalism because God can do whatever he wants without taking anything into account. Also, as far as we know, only.material things can create material things.
I was raised catholic and got kicked out of Sunday school for asking to many questions at 5 years old. They told my mom that I questioned God to much lol. A 5 year olds questions were to complicated to be answered. That's all I have to say about religion!!
Billy: do you disbelieve because Bible god is shitty? Us: No. We disbelieve because it's not believable. We grieve (and point and laugh) that people believe in something so unbelievable. And consider such a shitty thing to be Perfect. Do we disbelieve cuz Problem of Evil? Nope. Problem of Evil is only a problem for believers.
Right. If you can provide evidence that your god exists, great. I will still say that he is a shitty god, but I will believe that he exists. I also don't like cancer. That doesn't stop me from believing it exists.
This was live in the Free Thought Library recently? Ahhhhh I would’ve sooooo come and seen this one in person. How often do they film there and how can I find out when the next one is? And who is on the next one? These shows are so much better with a live audience in my opinion
I had higher hopes for the way this call from Billy might go, based on the beginning…he was finally willing to talk about something other than simulation theory. Still ended up incredulous and angry at the end.
00:00 Intro
06:46 David-CA | Removing Religious Teaching From Society
28:29 Sean-TX | Cannibals of Lanciano
47:52 Ivan-CA | Crossing The Non-Belief Threshold
58:52 Joshua-(USA) | Made By Jesus On Every Piece Of Matter
1:18:46 Mike-WA | Amino Acids Can't Self Assemble
1:28:19 Benjamin-AL | Defending Slavery Again
1:43:12 Steve-NE | Arguing For Octopus Rights
2:05:26 Jimmy-NY | Why Don't You Believe in God?
2:30:32 Billy-TX | Observer Effect And The Supernatural
2:51:38 Mike-WA | God Did Not Create A Lousy World
Thank you time stamp person/s ❤
Thanks to the time stamp djinn.
I’ll give 56 verses on just one topic INCEST that’s a true contradictions that you can’t circumvent or loophole and squeeze your way out of them by saying god wrote a book as a aligorical joke or whatever they claim . There are 2 main issues but multiple verses that say INCEST is an abomination and shall require punishment. Noah’s ark tale and Adam and Eve tale
RUclips censorship on my post on Bible errors
Brian was so boring.
Gosh, this program was really fun to watch
@@marcosolo6491 for sure. That's not how it usually goes. Pretty long show but nice to watch
Yeah, really good show guys
My 3 favourite hosts. It feels like I've hit the jackpot!!!
Warning label God forgot to include: "Objects in the Bible May Appear Truer Than They Are."
Classic
Forrest, JMike, and SR together. I've died and gone to heav....Ahh, never mind.
Especially when the wig joined in
Good lineup. I'm partial to Johnny P Angel
This was the best exp show ever!!!!
It was the first show in a long time that I was able to watch straight through without getting bored. I know it was pure luck but the variety of callers was just right.
Mainly, the 3 hosts together and how they bring the fun into the show.
They vibe. I could watch these 3 every day.
Cannibals of Lanciano is a great name for a gothic/dark wave band
i was thinking more like death metal
Bluegrass
Warning label god forgot to make: Rated "M" for mature. This book contains depictions of planetary genocide, extreme violence, slavery, and incest.
Rated R for violence, sexual themes, and nonsense assertions.
Rated "F" for F*ed up fan fiction.
@@BlarglemanTheSkeptic2 Don’t sugarcoat that sh*t Blargleman! Lol
FRAGILE THEOLOGY, DO NOT STACK
Forrest - Hello my name is Science
JMike - My name is Philosophy
Objectively Dan - My name is Dan
Love you all!
And what is SR? Chopped liver?
I thought Forrest’s name was Poop😂
@@wyldink1 Sir Realism?
And, of course, philosophy has the wonderful hair and beard.
@@klaxoncow haha something known well by the Greeks!
Forrest, your original response to Dave is great! I thank my kids every time they correct me. Hopefully, that teaches them that people in authority can be wrong, and it's their duty to stand up for reality.
"I'm wrong, so I won't answer questions that show me being wrong." That's what Mike seems to say when he ignores the lightning question.
Really enjoyable show, great combination of hosts, they stabilised out each others inadequacies and boosted each others strengths!
Hahaha!
Mike: God didn't make the world bad.
Forrest: Who made the world bad?
Mike: God did.
Good one, Mike.
You can actually hear him lie to himself in real time
@@jasongreen3434 it's sad what religion does to people
JMike is one of my favorite atheist show hosts, but it would better serve his communication with callers if he "spoke to his audience" a bit more. Because of his intelligence and knowledge, there are times where they don't track what he's saying.
Sean - TX is a great example. There were a series of questions starting around the 38 or so minute mark where he didn't grasp what JMike was asking, but instead of rephrasing he asked them in the exact same way. The questions weren't that high-brow really, but the call would've gone smoother if JMike had met the caller where's he at.
Completely agree. He's so sharp with his logical perspectives, but he gets too bogged down by his terminology. He's a great thinker, but not so great a teacher. He'd be so much more effective if he could communicate the same ideas in terms that the everyman who doesn't deal with philosophy every day can understand.
Yeah definitely agree. I’ve listened to thousands of hours of these shows so I know most arguments but I was having trouble following what he meant by “the father affirming the son”. I know what all those words mean but to the average person it’s doesn’t have a clear meaning.
Theme for today.
Atheism doesn't make you smarter.
But it _does_ make you 14% better looking.
And awesomely hirsute!!
Speak for yourself -- I'm a goblin and comfortable with it. 😂
@@anthonysmith8800 being hirsute is like wearing a hair suit.
multiplicative or additive?
I've been a fan for a very long time. The new breed on the show renews my faith in your efforts to rid the globe of religious dogma. Great work!
The holy trinity of hosts 🙏
Sensational content as always
AXP 🥰
Keep up the great work 💪
Peace Love Empathy From Australia 🤠
Australians, giving the finger to any hypothetical god(dess): "go f' yourself with all your lethal spiders and snakes, we *will* live here!" 😁👌
Warning label: All characters and situations depicted herein are fictitious.
Any resemblance to actual persons or events is entirely coincidental, accidental, or psychological.
You handled that Jimmy caller masterfully, in a way that was both excoriating and humane, revealing the monstrousness of his no doubt deeply held beliefs and exposing his terrified reliance on preaching rather than genuinely advocating for Christianity. You actually managed to make me feel sorry for him, I must confess I often struggle to empathize with proselytizing people due to how blatantly dishonest and disengaged from normal social interaction such people are.
I agree with SR when he said he needs to stop telling bad callers to call back in. Sadly, he later went against his own advice and told several bad callers to call back in.
That was a great show,the three of you are great together.Forrest's speech at the end with Jimmy was magic.Keep it up,these shows make a difference.
Great episode. Funny and instructive. You should bring Dan much more often on AXP.
Forrest and Mike as a duo are always gold. 😅 Funny and simultaneously educational.
Motto of the show apparently was: don’t let the theist run their script. It worked amazingly. *slow clap*
It's boring and fallacious when they do
That's usually the motto of the show.
Sure, though I was with Dan on the caller about the miracle. They should have actually dug into the flaws in that miracle. Just my opinion.
@@scotthoenle7693 they could've spent an hour on that one call, and it may have been worth it, but they might not have gotten to some of the others then.
They’ve ran this show since 1997, they probably hear the same theist script countless times. To the point, where it’s so easily refutable that they usually just stop the script
The Trinity breaks the basic principles of equality and logic.
The basic logic of the trinity
All A's = C, B's= C, therefore A = B
But A says he is C, but not B
And B says he C, but is not A
A=the Father
B=the Son
C= God
When examining the statement "A = C but not B, B = C but not A" purely from a logical perspective, without any theological or Christian context, we encounter an apparent logical contradiction.
Here’s why:
1. **Equality in Logic:**
- If we say "A = C," we are asserting that A and C are the same or equivalent in some way.
- Similarly, "B = C" asserts that B and C are the same or equivalent.
- In classical logic, if A equals C and B equals C, then A must equal B (transitive property of equality).
2. **The Contradiction:**
- The statement "A = C but not B" implies that A and C are equivalent, but A is not equivalent to B.
- The statement "B = C but not A" similarly implies that B and C are equivalent, but B is not equivalent to A.
- These statements are contradictory because, under the transitive property of equality, if A = C and B = C, then it must follow that A = B.
### Pure Logical Analysis:
- **Transitive Property:** In classical logic, if A = C and B = C, then A must equal B. Denying this would break the basic principles of equality and logic.
- **Contradiction:** Saying "A = C but not B" and "B = C but not A" simultaneously introduces a contradiction, as it suggests that A and B are both equal to C but somehow not equal to each other, which defies the transitive property.
### Possible Logical Interpretations:
To make logical sense of the statements, you might need to reinterpret the symbols or introduce additional qualifications:
1. **Different Contexts or Perspectives:**
- If "A = C" in one context or under certain conditions and "B = C" in another, but A and B do not overlap in those contexts, you might avoid a direct contradiction. However, this approach introduces ambiguity rather than clarity.
2. **Different Types of Equality:**
- You could argue that "A = C" and "B = C" represent different kinds of equivalence (e.g., A and C share one characteristic, while B and C share another). But in pure logical terms, the symbol "=" usually denotes the same type of equality or equivalence, so this would require altering the meaning of the equals sign.
### Conclusion:
Without reinterpreting the statements, **there is no straightforward logical way** to claim that "A = C but not B" and "B = C but not A" without running into a contradiction. The transitive property of equality demands that if A equals C and B equals C, then A must equal B. Therefore, in pure logical terms, the statements are contradictory and cannot be true simultaneously.
Therefore God cannot be both the Father & the Son.
Christianity says the father is God, the Son is God, but at the same time God is not the Father & Son.
We are trillions of cells, but one being & person.
We cannot say each cell together are one being but separate persons. If they are separate persons then they are separate beings.
So the biggest contradiction in the bible is God.
JMike looks like a wise sage with his two accolytes
God’s warning: Living in strict accordance with biblical tenets WILL put you at risk for severe criminal and/or civil liability.
If you read the fine-fine-fine-fine print, youll see that; and i quote.
"We are not responsible for the choices made under our discretion or ordered here in our book, since these claims are so outlandish that no one should take them seriously"
Maybbbeee i mistook Tucker Carlson's nazi legal case for the bible.
Long-hair Forrest bears a striking resemblance to Isaac Newton!
Warning label God forgot to include: Thou shalt not copy or distribute
Especially by graven image.
Warning label god forgot to make: Keep away from small children and anyone with a gullible mind.
@@TheistsTapOut lol I initially read this as an instruction for ME to keep away from those specified in your post, so it didn’t make sense at first.
Wow, this episode has given me laughter, goosebumps and deep thoughts🎉 amazing
I'd LOVE for octopi to be from space! How f'ing awesome would that be!??!!!
Well that could be the proof that cuthulluh is the real deal and therefore the great old ones. 😊
What about squids are they like a subspecies alien as well
You may enjoy the children of time series
“Except for the fucking point I’m making!” - JMike
I had to replay that a half dozen times. Gold!
On the whole 'tree of the knowledge of and good and evil' thing, I gotta say it annoys me that whenever that story is brought up, it's always that 'yaweh didn't need to put the tree next to Adam and Eve' . Should that instead be 'yaweh shouldn't even need to have such a tree at all"??.
Presumably, he already knows the difference, so the tree isn't for him, and he never intended for Adam and Eve to know the difference, so why create the bleeping tree in the first place??
Or perhaps yaweh does need the tree after all because it seems that if anyone needs to know the difference between good and evil, it's yaweh himself. In the OT, he is almost always embodying evil, but very seldom embodies good
This has been a great show.
WHOA! The way Sean is explaining the "eating the body of Christ" ritual sounds eerily similar to tribal warriors eating the flesh of their defeated enemies to gain their strength & power! 😲 Yet Christian churches send missionaries to convert these "jungle savages"! WTF kind of ironic hypocrisy is this? 🤣Talk about the blind leading the blind!
Benjamin is just lonely. It's obvious. He calls in every week and has nothing to say.
He drove away all his friends by trying to defend slavery.
He did have one thing to say... 1:40:44 😳
@@mirandarensberger6919 I think he's from Alabama. That would get him some friends in parts of that state.
Some people talk because they have something to say, others talk because they HAVE to say SOMETHING!
@@mirandarensberger6919 He said one one of his calls that he has been banned from every church in his town.
What he really needs is mental heath care.
Warning label God forgot to include: This book is a work of fiction and should not be regarded as a reliable guide to science, history, or moral behavior.
Someone wrote in one of these "...whenever I'm in a hotel, I take the Gideon bible out of the nightstand...I flip to "in the beginning," scratch it out and write, "Once upon a time,"
Fuck I died when i read that. I'm laughing now as i pass it on
Awesome show guys!!!!!
JMike: Stop doing that!
Tons of people: I DON'T KNOW WHAT YOU ARE TALKING ABOUT!
3:08:54 also, you have an infinite amount of recordings, with all kinds of outcomes for the game, and you choose the recording where you know the team loses.
I have so much respect for JMike. I've always liked him. But I can never understand what he's talking about. I normally don't have much sympathy for theist callers. But when they're having trouble understanding JMike's words, I do empathize. Love you man. No idea what you're ever trying to say.
JMike could definitely work a little harder on dumbing it down. I like it when he can show he’s better at using big words than someone else who’s just trying to sound impressive, but I fall asleep when I hear a six-syllable word from a host.
Mitch Hedberg answered Sean’s problem really well already. One is not big enough to hold two. That’s why two and three were created.
1:40:44 "Well, what about, what about incest?"
Holy sudden _right_ turn at Albuquerque, Batman! 😳🤯
@@BlarglemanTheSkeptic2 Lol, leave Albuquerque out of it! We have enough issues without that!
Benjamin gives incest 5/7. Would do it again.
Albuquerque: Incest Capital of the nort eastern South West .
Huh. OP about incest. But I add to the thread. Use the word. Post is voiped. Or at least vanished for me.
@@brucebaker810Go to the video and sort the comments by newest. You can still see it that way. Just RUclips's weird semi-censorship.
Anyway, my home state of Georgia has a 50% higher rate of inc*st than my current state of New Mexico. And within NM, I couldn't find stats, but I really doubt if Albuquerque is the inc*st capital; that will probably be someplace like Española or Grants if I had to guess. And now all that is in my search history; I should probably learn to just shut up sometimes, lol.
During the call from Jimmy from NY something that has been playing around at the edges of my currently 70 year old mind came home hard. I understand that when I stop that's it. There is no afterlife that so far can be proven to me even if there is some unproven basis for one. With that I've started wishing that for me to believe wouldn't be just me going with Pascal's wager. I still know that there is little or no truth to any idea of an after life no matter how comforting such a belief would be to someone well into the last half of life.
And no, I don't want anyone to come along with some words that would provide false comfort.
OTOH, it would be nice to know all there is to know about the universe just because it would be nice.
OMG Billy is back!! And he was so much more respectful to a group of dudes. Figured
The threat of Hell presented me with a question. Satan is supposedly the enemy of God. Rebelled. Says he isn't going to be God's servant. But then Christians say he is in charge of Hell to punish the sinners God sends there. My question is: why would the guy who doesn't want to serve God work for God for eternity doing His dirty work? Wouldn't it be a funny FU for Satan to welcome his fellow rebels and free thinkers with their favorite snacks and beverage and show them all a good time? Satan wins the day with bringing logic and knowledge to humanity. Being the very light of reason. Threats, torture, pain, killing, and might equals right is God's gig.
Shaw in Man and Superman has that kind of hell. People can switch between heaven and hell at will.
Exactly, I always thought about the proposition of lucifer running the hell hotel why would he be in the service of god, as in “I’D RATHER REIGN IN HELL THAN SERVE IN HEAVAN.” evidently logic and faith dont mix..
Why do people insist the life must have some objective purpose?
Why can't the purpose of life not just be to live?
Exactly! Theists feel the universe owes them an explanation, it certainly doesn't. The thought of ceasing to exist is too much for them. They have predetermined there has to be an afterlife or they can't enjoy this life. It must be a comfort thing. I remember a Christian saying 'there has to be an afterlife, this can't be it'. That sounds to me like someone who is taking their life for granted, the life they know they get. One saying I'll never forget was when I heard for the first time 'life is not a rehearsal, this is it!!' it's so sad that theists see an afterlife as what its all about. Talk about taking life for granted!
Its a pretty understandable misconception. The human brain is hardwired to see patterns, and for our survival, large events have mostly been from large issues.(social and natural).
So when they connect "life" being all these systems, they assume that it must be from something equally as big.
Its one of the early documented things that the bible shows how its fictional, the reason why "old" gods used to be angry and make mistakes was to excuse this, and ambrhamic lore dropped that and excused humans are the problem.
The forgotten warning label on all forskins “Remove before use or void your souls warranty”
I have a theory that all the "Made by Jesus" labels on everything in the universe were put there by a Shinto wood spirit whose StickerMe order was misprinted and she said "screw it, I'll take the labels if you give me a discount on the order". She is who we should be worshipping, in spite of the mixup.
I am convinced there is a brick lord and he DOES desire bricks…
Amazing episode! Love this trio! 🥰
What's a warning label God forgot to make? There should have been a warning from God that says "I'm not actually omnipotent, or all-knowing, or even good, despite the claims in the Bible that I am those things."
Wasn't that Billy the same dude who called in saying he had an iron clad argument that couldn't be refuted?
He was also the one that berated and was absolutely owned by Genevieve and Katy in Talk Heathen. I was thinking he was managing to remain respectful this time, but he lost his cool at the end. Definitely anger problems in this one
THANK YOU JMIKE FOR DEFENDING PINEAPPLE ON PIZZA. Everyone else can take their chickey nuggeys w/ ketchup eating ash pallet and let those who enjoy a complex flavor mash like, oh idk, sweet and savory, do so in peace.
Pineapple chunks don't belong on a pizza. Thinly sliced pineapple rings do belong on a pizza. It'll change your world.
Could adults please stop saying “chicken nuggies”?
This feels a bit hypocritical.
Where in the bible does it say you can't put pineapple on pizza?, I know you not allowed to cook a baby goat in its mothers milk, that's so important its even the 10th commandment.[seconds & permanent set]
, cant eat Bats because they are unclean birds...but nothing about pineapple on pizza...
Just NO rabbit & pineapple on pizza, rabbits are unclean because they chew the cud. And Ham & pineapple obviously a no no, because pigs have the wrong feet,but I think that is juat because God wanted all the bacon for himself.
There is something divine about bacon & cheese.
Canadian bacon and pineapple has always been my favorite pizza topping. What is wrong with ppl?
The mind is what the brain does.
Id love to smoke out with JMike
I think hearing some of the things he says would make my mind explode
Holy moly a 3+ hour video! Great way to spend my Thursday! I really plan to donate to get a brick one of these days. I really want a brick!
enjoyable show, great arguments against the 'evil' lunacy of christianity.
the logo covers up Eddie Van Halen is....I'm assuming it says dead.
The scientist, the philosopher and the convert. Dream team.
Joshua has the energy of a vacuum salesman.
I'm glad Dan answered the question of the week first, he set the bar high with magical sea horns!
For many people "There has to be something."
For me. There is much we do NOT know YET. But I do not expect a Supernatural something among what we don't yet know.
Amazing show!❤❤❤
Wasn't it just!? What a power trio!
Joshua, put down the script! I get so pissed with callers who clearly stick to their apologist rhetoric instead of listening and having actual discussions...
This was a great show. I am a fan of the "3 headed monster" and even though every repeat caller came with their usual bullshit I enjoyed this episode.
The live audience is the real MVP here. Those chairs look atrocious!
in the studio like the good old days
I wanna get Made by Jesus tattooed on my unit.
Holy shit guys, such a good episode! Cheers to all involved
My life is complete. Thank you for the Trinity! 47:29
32:00 If the wafer enters the mouth, gets soaked in saliva, the digestion has begun. Carbohydrates are breaking down, right? What else of a wafer gets digested before we get to the stomach? Where does the switch-to-flesh occur?
Sean, the article.
There should be articles in peer reviewed scientific journals.
I think when he took Tour's side, Mike from WA lost me and then he called Forrest a "poop". 'Oh my glob' the calls where they don't want a conversation and just want to preach and tell people how poopy they are I just don't care. There were some great calls too.
After hearing the question "Is it ever OK to own a human being?", anyone who says "well...." doesn't have an argument.
Mike's call reminds me of my own invented saying, namely: Almost all of us know almost nothing about almost everything. So keep reading ! Keep looking! Keep learning!
Great show. I love this format.
Best one in a while. Thanks guys.
Billy, dark matter and dark energy ARE both detectable. We detect their effects on galaxies/stars. With dark matter, we see how it holds each galaxy together and with dark energy, we see how it’s accelerating galaxies away from each other. But that’s ALL we can detect from it. We’re in the “dark” about everything else with them.
Benjamin and Jimmy deserve each other's company 😂 This was a good episode ❤
Warning label god Forgot to make : “ Warning ! May cause brain damage if taken literaly “
The fact that the natural laws are pretty strict within certain perimeters points to naturalism because God can do whatever he wants without taking anything into account. Also, as far as we know, only.material things can create material things.
J Mike, your hair looks amazing. What did you do??
Warning from god: “Some people may inexplicably become convinced that I actually exist.”
i love forest. he's smart and funny
The degree of delight Forrest showed at that terrible insult was brilliant 😛
46:32 Yes we _are!_
"What was your favourite part, Billy?"
"I liked the part where they talked about fruit on pizza for a looooong time!"
I was raised catholic and got kicked out of Sunday school for asking to many questions at 5 years old. They told my mom that I questioned God to much lol. A 5 year olds questions were to complicated to be answered. That's all I have to say about religion!!
Billy: do you disbelieve because Bible god is shitty?
Us: No. We disbelieve because it's not believable.
We grieve (and point and laugh) that people believe in something so unbelievable. And consider such a shitty thing to be Perfect.
Do we disbelieve cuz Problem of Evil? Nope. Problem of Evil is only a problem for believers.
Right. If you can provide evidence that your god exists, great. I will still say that he is a shitty god, but I will believe that he exists.
I also don't like cancer. That doesn't stop me from believing it exists.
Billy-TX is still alive and calls this show still?
The twist ending at the Rapture: The Bible... It's a COOK BOOK!
Band name: HAL Hippy Atheists with Longhair.
damn the energy in this one is incredible!!!
This was live in the Free Thought Library recently? Ahhhhh I would’ve sooooo come and seen this one in person. How often do they film there and how can I find out when the next one is? And who is on the next one?
These shows are so much better with a live audience in my opinion
the best experience yet. this trinity was minty fresh.
And why is eves punishment greater than Adam’s? He ate it too. Maybe this book was written by a man?
Heathen Trinity gets my vote!🤟
Funniest show in recent AXP history.
I had higher hopes for the way this call from Billy might go, based on the beginning…he was finally willing to talk about something other than simulation theory. Still ended up incredulous and angry at the end.