This video is a good summary of what Al Islaah is doing! It is brilliant! Thank you for your dedication, Jazak Allah! Keep up the good work, In Shaa Allah.
I’m interested in shia Islam but I find it a bit hard to find a clear answer regarding dua tawassul. For example, according to shia Fiqh, is it permissible to say “Ya Ali Madad” with the niyyah of asking Imam Ali (as) to make dua to Allah swt for me?
This channel has many videos on this topic. The fiqh of Ahl al-Bayt promotes no such practice. Invoking any entity other than Allah for whom we have no sultan (evidence) from Allah that they can hear us is shirk. Every argument brought forward to defend this practice has been refuted and dismantled with evidence on Al Islaah by the respected speaker. In fact, the Ahl al-Bayt always promoted invoking Allah alone.
If you are really sincerely interested in this topic, then you have come to the right channel, because there is hardly any other channel out there which has put out as much content on the topic of Tawassul and Istighatha (in light of the actual teachings of the Quran and Ahlul Bayt (as) as much as our channel has. We are happy to give you a guided tour. The Biggest Qur'anic Proof Against illegal Tawassul | Dr. Syed Ali Hur Kamoonpuri ruclips.net/video/J24bAL03T9k/видео.html This lecture sheds light on Ḥarām (forbidden) acts such as Duʿā’ and supplication to entities other than Allah (SWT) across Ghayb which people falsely presume to come under Tawassul when in fact they are Ḥarām (forbidden) acts which take one away from Allah (SWT), and land one straight into the displeasure and punishment of Allah (SWT). Quranic Tawassul Versus Haraam Tawassul (Taba'uud) | Dr. Syed Ali Hur Kamoonpuri ruclips.net/video/QKphUqW8HVM/видео.html In this talk, an attempt has been made to clarify and elucidate the difference and distinction between the Tawassul which is promoted by the Qur’ān and Ahlul Bayt (as) AND Ḥarām (forbidden) acts such as Duʿā’ and Istighatha to Ghayr Allah across Ghayb which people peddle and promote falsely under the pretext/guise/umbrella of Tawassul when in fact they are Ḥarām (forbidden) acts which take one away from Allah (SWT), and land one straight into the displeasure and punishment of Allah (SWT). Further traditional arguments and doubts about Tawassul have been addressed and dealt with in the following lecture in light of the clear verses of the Qur’ān as well as the Qur’ān-verified authentic teaching of the Ahlul Bayt (as): Response to the Practical Priest on Tawassul | Dr. Syed Ali Hur Kamoonpuri ruclips.net/video/iAg6GfWVKJI/видео.html Response to Sheikh Mohammed Al-Hilli on Istighaatha and Tawassul ruclips.net/video/j0Fvqr2sJ2c/видео.html Rapid Fire Response to Sheikh Mohammed Al-Hilli On Istigaatha & Tawassul ruclips.net/video/mY-TvsxFaCo/видео.html Istighatha to the Prophet (Saww) and Jibreel Is FABRICATED! ruclips.net/video/xZqdcxz5jLM/видео.html The above lecture has a chilling expose of a false and fabricated narration from Al-Kafi which was presented by Shaykh Muhammad al-Hilli from the Minbar in UK in support of the permissibility of Istighatha to the Prophet (Saww) and Jibreel (as). Al Islaah also broadcast a detailed refutation of the popular, traditional arguments and proofs brought forward by Shaykh Mohammad al Hilli in support of the popular practice of doing Istighaatha (calling us for help) to the Prophet (Saww) and the Imams of Ahlul Bayt (as) across Ghayb. It can be accessed from here: Counter to Shaykh Hilli on Istighatha | Leicester ruclips.net/video/kEbSNTrxMA4/видео.html Critical Review: Debate on Tawassul/Wasilah | Salafi Versus Traditional Imami ruclips.net/video/0_2M_4JtydE/видео.html This lecture is particularly valuable in view of its having one the best and most comprehensive explanations of Sūrah Nisā’ (Chapter 04), verse 64 of the Quran which is frequently decontextualized and quoted out of its rightful context by traditional pro-Ghuluww and Shirk apologists and polemicists to justify the act of supplicating to the Prophet (Saww) for intercession across Ghayb. The correct Tafsīr (exegesis) of this verse can be found at Time Stamp of: 1:14:30 onwards. The lecture also contains a refutation of numerous other traditional pro-Ghuluww arguments and deceptive fallacies which are routinely employed by sectarian goalkeepers to justify and legitimize the Shirk of supplicating across the curtain of Ghayb to entities lesser than, and other than, Allah (SWT). Must watch lecture for all those really confused by certain traditional Pro-Ghuluww arguments. See also: tawheedi.wordpress.com/encyclopedia/encyc-chap-24/ The Pure Tawheed from Thaqalain (Quran & Itrah) - Dr. Syed Ali Hur Kamoonpuri ruclips.net/video/tbxRonqsMTo/видео.html Tawassul According to the Ahlul Bayt (As) - Dr. Syed Ali Hur Kamoonpuri ruclips.net/video/CcU6OHBdPPc/видео.html The above lecture is aimed at correcting the understanding of the general public which thinks that 05:35 of the Quran means we should supplicate and make Duas to Imams for our needs. This lecture contains a detailed commentary and explanation of Sermon # 110 (# 109 in some editions) of Nahj al-Balāghah in which Imam ʿAlī (as) lists the acts of worship which are the best means of Tawassul (seeking nearness, closeness and proximity to Allah (SWT). The contents and claims of this sermon can be seen to be matching the teaching of the Qur’ān perfectly, and no where in this sermon does Imam (as) even hint at the modern day popular understanding of supplicating to and entreating entities other than Allah as a means of seeking nearness (Tawassul) to Him. The Tawhidi Encyclopaedia Al Islaah scholarship has also produced an encyclopedia in which they have endeavoured to gather, collect, and compile all the numerous different arguments and copes that are used by the proponents of Duʿā’ to Ghayr Allah and Istighātha across Ghayb to other than Allah in order to justify their forbidden practices. These arguments and copes have then been analysed and dissected in full depth in light of the Qur’ān and authentic teachings of the Ahlul Bayt (as). Link to our Tawheedi Encyclopaedia: tawheedi.wordpress.com/
@@mhholmez Thanks for your answer. Do the high ranking shia scholars or Ayatollahs also view it like that? I ask because if the fiqh of Ahl al Bayt refutes this practice then why is it done by so many shias?
@@Al-Islaah Thanks for your very detailed and informative reply. I’ll definitely check these videos out. It would be nice if you could also answer the second question under my comment concerning the view of high ranking shia scholars on dua tawassul. Jazak Allahu khayran
@@alid2224 Watch the above video and you will see our respected Sayyid has displayed and read out the view of a very high-ranking Marjaiyyah-approved scholar discrediting Dua Tawassul, so that in itself should show you that there are among the highest ranking scholars those who have openly condemned it and spoken out against it. If you watch the lectures whose links we have shared with you above, you will come across the statements of many more such scholars who have warned against calling upon any entity other than Allah across Ghayb. As for why all scholars don't openly speak out against it, you will find the answer to this question in the following lecture: Why Are the Maraje Silent? 🚨 ruclips.net/video/ZWPnRzNI2Fk/видео.html
Imam Ali (as) said there is no sin greater in the eyes of Allah than Shirk. So no matter what happens, and even if the day of judgement comes, Shirk will remain the biggest curse and the biggest source for people to earn the wrath of Allah. This is why the Dawah for Tawhid cannot and should not stop under any circumstance. Even if we have big and major things to pray about, if our people don't know Who they are supposed to pray to, and who they must not pray to, they will be doomed. That being said, our entire scholarship and community membership is currently engaged in very solemn and sincere Duas for Allah to help the oppressed and destroy the oppressors, and to bring relief to our brothers and sisters in Lebanon. And we will continue to persist in making these Duas until Allah brings about relief for them. We would urge you to do the same, and also to support the cause of creating awakening regarding Tawhid within our communities as that is the ultimate focus of the Quran and the lofty teachings of our beloved Prophet Muhammad (Saww) and the noble Imams (as) from his progeny.
Salam o Alaikum! Binge watching all your lectures since i found your channel couple of weeks ago! Kindly tell me when Respected Syed gonna deliver the lecture on "Birth of Imam Mahdi & And His Occultation". Cyz what seems that this whole concept was invented and i would request you to please have emphasis on those 4 Nayibs of Imam in his Mini Occultation. Did thy lie the whole time about existence and meeting Imam. JazakAllah o Khaira This is a huge claim by Shia Asna Ashari and if the existence of 12th Imam is challenged academically, the whole manhaj falls down to the roots
So you would have the world believe that the prestigious Markaz al-Abḥāth al-ʿAqāidiyyah (Centre for Belief Researches) which was founded under the auspices and supervision of the office of Grand Ayatullah Sayyid ʿAlī al-Ḥusaynī al-Sīstānī is hosting low level scholarr on it's panel? If you don't know about the Markaz and its panel of high-ranking scholars, as well as its endorsement by the office of the grand Marjeʿ, you may need to do some homework and read up on: aqaed.net/about. Also we would invite you to read the profile of this Ayatullah which our respected Sayyid has translated and included in his paper, and then tell us what in it makes him look like a low level or low ranking scholar to you: Profile of Ayatullah Shaykh Muḥammad al-Hādī al-Yūsufī al-Gharawī Ayatullah Shaykh Muḥammad Hādī al-Yūsufī al-Ghrawī was born in 1948 CE (1368 AH) in Najaf al-Ashraf. In 1960 CE (1380 AH), he began studying Arabic under the guidance of his late father, Āyatullāh Shaykh Mīrzā Maḥmūd al-Yūsufī al-Ghrawī. After completing the introductory, intermediate, and advanced stages of the Ḥawza curriculum by 1968 CE (1388 AH), Shaykh al-Yūsufī al-Ghrawī began attending higher-level, advanced classes (Baḥth al-Khārij) in Islamic jurisprudence and principles of jurisprudence (Uṣūl al-Fiqh). He studied Fiqh (jurisprudence) and Uṣūl al-Fiqh (principles of jurisprudence) under the late Grand Ayatullāh Sayyid Abū al-Qāsim al-Khūʾī (d. 1413 AH/1992 CE). Additionally, he studied the Fiqh al-muʿāmalāt (jurisprudence of transactioons) under the late Imam al-Khomeinī (d. 1409 AH/1989 CE), focusing on topics such as sales and contractual options (mabāḥith al-bayʿ wa al-khiyārāt). In 1971 CE (1391 AH), Shaykh al-Yūsufī al-Ghrawī was exiled to Iran, where he moved to Qum. There, he attended lessons in Fiqh and Uṣūl under Ayatullāh Sayyid Muḥammad Ṣādiq al-Rūḥānī and continued his studies with Āyatullāh Sayyid Kāẓim al-Ḥusaynī al-Ḥāʾirī until around 1990 CE (1410 AH). Shaykh al-Yūsufī al-Ghrawī has taught various subjects in both Najaf and Qum, including Arabic literature, logic, Uṣūl al-Fiqh (principles of jurisprudence), and Fiqh (Islamic jurisprudence). In Najaf, he taught works such as al-Tabṣirah, al-Mukhtaṣar al-Nāfiʿ, and Sharḥ al-Lumaʿatayn. In Qum, he taught Arabic grammar, Islamic beliefs, and Islamic concepts at the Gulpāyigānī School and the Institute for Islamic Studies. Following the Islamic Revolution, he taught at Ḥawza Ḥujjatiyya and Imam Khomeinī School, where he focused on Islamic history, Ḥadīth, Nahj al-Balāghah, Qurʾānic sciences, and advanced jurisprudence (mabāḥith al-makāsib). Shaykh al-Yūsufī al-Ghrawī also lectured on Islamic thought, principles of faith, Qurʾānic sciences, and Ḥadīth at various institutions, including the Islamic Revolutionary Guard’s School of Doctrinal and Political Education, the Faculty of Theology and Qurʾānic Sciences in Qum and Dezfūl, and he continues to contribute to the field of Qurʾānic exegesis and Islamic studies. He is also a prolific author and erudite researcher with some very insightful and beneficial works to his credit such as his 8 volume encylopaedia on Islamic history entitled موسوعة التاريخ الإسلامي (Encylopaedia of Islamic History), his study of the status of women in Jāhiliyyah and Islam entitled المرأة في الجاهلية والإسلام (Woman in Jāhiliyyah and Islam), as well as his scholarly annotated edition of the Maqtal of Abū Mikhnaf entitled وقعة الطف (The Battle of Ṭaff). He has also authored a monograph on the history of Ḥadīth entitled من تاريخ الحديث رواية وكتابة إلى عهد معاوية (Glimpses from the History of Ḥadīth, its transmission and transcription until the period of Muʿāwiyah), and an anthology of reliable and verified supplications entitled منهاج الحياة في الأدعية والزيارات عن أهل بيت الهداة (A Syllabus for Life in Supplications and Visitational Recitals from the Guides of the Ahl al-Bayt). He has also delivered some very beneficial lectures series and participated in some hard-hitting interviews and podcasts which are available online such as his podcast on the Mukhtārnāmeh in which he pointed out that the Mukhtār series had very many historically inaccurate and false portrayals , as well as other lectures.
Plz brother I request you exposed Hassan Allahyari videos and his allegations against nabi karim Saw biwi and KHULFA rasdeeen and other's saaba r ۔z ۔۔ you refute in english language ۔but you used Urdu subtitles understanding Urdu hindi people Hassan Allahyari is biggest fitna ۔۔۔۔ countinue great job ۔may Allah swt bless you and increase your knowledge give you success in noble cause ameen ۔۔۔
Brother, you say some truth but you twist other issues to achieve your aim of dismantling Imams. You lie sometimes but you do it in a way that's difficult to see quickly. Your claims are misguided and you know it. Please stop and abandon your goal.
@@mhholmez he claimed that there is no mention of 12 imams in basair darajat. This is a clear manipulation...the book mentioned 12, it just used another word instead of imam.
@@AbuAyoka It seems you have been deceived by anti-Islaah propaganda and have jumped to conclusions based on mere hearsay without investigating deeper. When we contacted our respected Sayyid about this matter a while back, he explained to us that first of all, the claim in question is not his own, but rather that of higher level critical scholarship, so even if it were wrong or false, the fault would be with the higher level scholarship, and he wouldn't be a liar for pointing to the view of that higher level scholarship even if it were wrong. To be a liar, you need to make a claim on your own authority which you know to be false, and our Sayyid has never done that. Secondly, the claim of the higher level scholarship he was referring to is not even false. It is actually true, because the higher level scholarship has conclusively shown how those narrations which claim the number of the Imams to be 12 are actually backward projections and fabricated interpolations. If you want to see the evidence for this, the respected Sayyid has promised to showcase it and explain it in detail when he responds to the doubts raised by Bayat al-Ghadir channel inshallah. So don't get carried away by their false claims and character assassination without hearing what the other side has to say.
@@AbuAyoka We did ask the respected Sayyid about this a while back when Bayatul Ghadir had first made this allegation against him, and he responded by pointing out that first of all, this is not his personal claim or something he has come up with from his pocket, rather it is the claim of higher level critical academic as well as seminarian scholarship, so even if it were wrong, it wouldn't make him a liar, because to be a liar, you need to claim something which is the opposite of what you know to be true, whereas our respected Sayyid is not claiming something here on his own accord, rather he is merely reflecting and presenting what independent scholarship has said, so whether their conclusion is right or wrong, the Sayyid cannot be accused of lying either way so long as he accurately presents their view. Secondly, the respected Sayyid revealed to us that the conclusion of the higher level scholarship in this matter is not even false, because he has proof that reports about 12 Imams found in modern editions of Basair are fabrications which have been interpolated into Basair al-Darajaat as well as other books, so the claim of the higher level academic scholarship is not even false to begin with, and therefore, the respected Sayyid cannot be accused of lying from any angle at all. The lesson you should learn from this is not to rush to conclusions and not trust any random bunch of polemicists when they make tall claims or try to character assassinator sincere scholars by accusing them of being liars. Rather, you should have patience and investigate the matter, and especially hear out the other side before making up your own mind. When our respected Sayyid will issue his responses to Bayat al-Ghadir, you will get to see the evidence he has which shows he has not lied about any such claim.
@@Al-Islaah What is important is for you guys to abandon your aim of dismantling Imama. It is impossible to dismantle Imama and I believe you know it, because it is a decree and design of Allah. Why do you call yourselves Shia if you do not believe in Imama? Why did the prophet say follow ahlulbayt if Imama is not truth? why are there groups of Shia since the beginning of Islamic history if Imama is false?.........etc If Imama is false why did the content of the last letter of Imam Mahdi consistent with hadiths of the Prophet, the companions and the Imams before....collected by shia and sunni....That proves the hadiths mentioning 12 imams and their names are not fabrications. Referring to some high level scholars is of no use. There are high level Shia scholars who have indirectly allowed homosexuality; there are those who say you can marry babies and fondle them with the private part etc.....these are brothers of shayateen who have eaten khums of the poor into their bellies........don't be like them.
Link to complete lecture:
ruclips.net/video/H0I68UTupw4/видео.html
This video is a good summary of what Al Islaah is doing! It is brilliant! Thank you for your dedication, Jazak Allah! Keep up the good work, In Shaa Allah.
Aah, its our fav too, 12:17 brother concluded and destroyed in few mins :D Biggest shout-out to him!
your videos syed ali are gems to the sincere students of knowledge. jazakallah, please continue uploading frequently.
I’m interested in shia Islam but I find it a bit hard to find a clear answer regarding dua tawassul. For example, according to shia Fiqh, is it permissible to say “Ya Ali Madad” with the niyyah of asking Imam Ali (as) to make dua to Allah swt for me?
This channel has many videos on this topic. The fiqh of Ahl al-Bayt promotes no such practice. Invoking any entity other than Allah for whom we have no sultan (evidence) from Allah that they can hear us is shirk. Every argument brought forward to defend this practice has been refuted and dismantled with evidence on Al Islaah by the respected speaker.
In fact, the Ahl al-Bayt always promoted invoking Allah alone.
If you are really sincerely interested in this topic, then you have come to the right channel, because there is hardly any other channel out there which has put out as much content on the topic of Tawassul and Istighatha (in light of the actual teachings of the Quran and Ahlul Bayt (as) as much as our channel has.
We are happy to give you a guided tour.
The Biggest Qur'anic Proof Against illegal Tawassul | Dr. Syed Ali Hur Kamoonpuri
ruclips.net/video/J24bAL03T9k/видео.html
This lecture sheds light on Ḥarām (forbidden) acts such as Duʿā’ and supplication to entities other than Allah (SWT) across Ghayb which people falsely presume to come under Tawassul when in fact they are Ḥarām (forbidden) acts which take one away from Allah (SWT), and land one straight into the displeasure and punishment of Allah (SWT).
Quranic Tawassul Versus Haraam Tawassul (Taba'uud) | Dr. Syed Ali Hur Kamoonpuri
ruclips.net/video/QKphUqW8HVM/видео.html
In this talk, an attempt has been made to clarify and elucidate the difference and distinction between the Tawassul which is promoted by the Qur’ān and Ahlul Bayt (as) AND Ḥarām (forbidden) acts such as Duʿā’ and Istighatha to Ghayr Allah across Ghayb which people peddle and promote falsely under the pretext/guise/umbrella of Tawassul when in fact they are Ḥarām (forbidden) acts which take one away from Allah (SWT), and land one straight into the displeasure and punishment of Allah (SWT).
Further traditional arguments and doubts about Tawassul have been addressed and dealt with in the following lecture in light of the clear verses of the Qur’ān as well as the Qur’ān-verified authentic teaching of the Ahlul Bayt (as):
Response to the Practical Priest on Tawassul | Dr. Syed Ali Hur Kamoonpuri
ruclips.net/video/iAg6GfWVKJI/видео.html
Response to Sheikh Mohammed Al-Hilli on Istighaatha and Tawassul
ruclips.net/video/j0Fvqr2sJ2c/видео.html
Rapid Fire Response to Sheikh Mohammed Al-Hilli On Istigaatha & Tawassul
ruclips.net/video/mY-TvsxFaCo/видео.html
Istighatha to the Prophet (Saww) and Jibreel Is FABRICATED!
ruclips.net/video/xZqdcxz5jLM/видео.html
The above lecture has a chilling expose of a false and fabricated narration from Al-Kafi which was presented by Shaykh Muhammad al-Hilli from the Minbar in UK in support of the permissibility of Istighatha to the Prophet (Saww) and Jibreel (as).
Al Islaah also broadcast a detailed refutation of the popular, traditional arguments and proofs brought forward by Shaykh Mohammad al Hilli in support of the popular practice of doing Istighaatha (calling us for help) to the Prophet (Saww) and the Imams of Ahlul Bayt (as) across Ghayb. It can be accessed from here:
Counter to Shaykh Hilli on Istighatha | Leicester
ruclips.net/video/kEbSNTrxMA4/видео.html
Critical Review: Debate on Tawassul/Wasilah | Salafi Versus Traditional Imami
ruclips.net/video/0_2M_4JtydE/видео.html
This lecture is particularly valuable in view of its having one the best and most comprehensive explanations of Sūrah Nisā’ (Chapter 04), verse 64 of the Quran which is frequently decontextualized and quoted out of its rightful context by traditional pro-Ghuluww and Shirk apologists and polemicists to justify the act of supplicating to the Prophet (Saww) for intercession across Ghayb. The correct Tafsīr (exegesis) of this verse can be found at Time Stamp of: 1:14:30 onwards.
The lecture also contains a refutation of numerous other traditional pro-Ghuluww arguments and deceptive fallacies which are routinely employed by sectarian goalkeepers to justify and legitimize the Shirk of supplicating across the curtain of Ghayb to entities lesser than, and other than, Allah (SWT). Must watch lecture for all those really confused by certain traditional Pro-Ghuluww arguments.
See also: tawheedi.wordpress.com/encyclopedia/encyc-chap-24/
The Pure Tawheed from Thaqalain (Quran & Itrah) - Dr. Syed Ali Hur Kamoonpuri
ruclips.net/video/tbxRonqsMTo/видео.html
Tawassul According to the Ahlul Bayt (As) - Dr. Syed Ali Hur Kamoonpuri
ruclips.net/video/CcU6OHBdPPc/видео.html
The above lecture is aimed at correcting the understanding of the general public which thinks that 05:35 of the Quran means we should supplicate and make Duas to Imams for our needs.
This lecture contains a detailed commentary and explanation of Sermon # 110 (# 109 in some editions) of Nahj al-Balāghah in which Imam ʿAlī (as) lists the acts of worship which are the best means of Tawassul (seeking nearness, closeness and proximity to Allah (SWT). The contents and claims of this sermon can be seen to be matching the teaching of the Qur’ān perfectly, and no where in this sermon does Imam (as) even hint at the modern day popular understanding of supplicating to and entreating entities other than Allah as a means of seeking nearness (Tawassul) to Him.
The Tawhidi Encyclopaedia
Al Islaah scholarship has also produced an encyclopedia in which they have endeavoured to gather, collect, and compile all the numerous different arguments and copes that are used by the proponents of Duʿā’ to Ghayr Allah and Istighātha across Ghayb to other than Allah in order to justify their forbidden practices. These arguments and copes have then been analysed and dissected in full depth in light of the Qur’ān and authentic teachings of the Ahlul Bayt (as).
Link to our Tawheedi Encyclopaedia:
tawheedi.wordpress.com/
@@mhholmez Thanks for your answer. Do the high ranking shia scholars or Ayatollahs also view it like that? I ask because if the fiqh of Ahl al Bayt refutes this practice then why is it done by so many shias?
@@Al-Islaah Thanks for your very detailed and informative reply. I’ll definitely check these videos out. It would be nice if you could also answer the second question under my comment concerning the view of high ranking shia scholars on dua tawassul. Jazak Allahu khayran
@@alid2224
Watch the above video and you will see our respected Sayyid has displayed and read out the view of a very high-ranking Marjaiyyah-approved scholar discrediting Dua Tawassul, so that in itself should show you that there are among the highest ranking scholars those who have openly condemned it and spoken out against it.
If you watch the lectures whose links we have shared with you above, you will come across the statements of many more such scholars who have warned against calling upon any entity other than Allah across Ghayb.
As for why all scholars don't openly speak out against it, you will find the answer to this question in the following lecture:
Why Are the Maraje Silent? 🚨
ruclips.net/video/ZWPnRzNI2Fk/видео.html
Sayed Ali Hurr is gem of knowledge. He has opened eyes of many truth seekers
Be careful,wake up,listen to other speakers,this man is funded by wahabis
KEEP GOING SHEIKH.....GOD IS GUIDING AL ISLAAH TO BRING PEOPLE BACK FROM THE WRONG PATH....
Stop all this all sides we the Muslim and shias have bigger things to think and pray about .
Imam Ali (as) said there is no sin greater in the eyes of Allah than Shirk.
So no matter what happens, and even if the day of judgement comes, Shirk will remain the biggest curse and the biggest source for people to earn the wrath of Allah.
This is why the Dawah for Tawhid cannot and should not stop under any circumstance.
Even if we have big and major things to pray about, if our people don't know Who they are supposed to pray to, and who they must not pray to, they will be doomed.
That being said, our entire scholarship and community membership is currently engaged in very solemn and sincere Duas for Allah to help the oppressed and destroy the oppressors, and to bring relief to our brothers and sisters in Lebanon. And we will continue to persist in making these Duas until Allah brings about relief for them.
We would urge you to do the same, and also to support the cause of creating awakening regarding Tawhid within our communities as that is the ultimate focus of the Quran and the lofty teachings of our beloved Prophet Muhammad (Saww) and the noble Imams (as) from his progeny.
Thanks for This Eye Opening Revelation, Take a Step Forward and Encourage your Father to Plant A Tree
Salam o Alaikum!
Binge watching all your lectures since i found your channel couple of weeks ago!
Kindly tell me when Respected Syed gonna deliver the lecture on "Birth of Imam Mahdi & And His Occultation".
Cyz what seems that this whole concept was invented and i would request you to please have emphasis on those 4 Nayibs of Imam in his Mini Occultation. Did thy lie the whole time about existence and meeting Imam.
JazakAllah o Khaira
This is a huge claim by Shia Asna Ashari and if the existence of 12th Imam is challenged academically, the whole manhaj falls down to the roots
Highest level scholarship lol. Omg. R u serious
"Ayatullah al-Uzma" and "Ayatullah" are highest-level scholars in the hawzah, are they not?
So you would have the world believe that the prestigious Markaz al-Abḥāth al-ʿAqāidiyyah (Centre for Belief Researches) which was founded under the auspices and supervision of the office of Grand Ayatullah Sayyid ʿAlī al-Ḥusaynī al-Sīstānī is hosting low level scholarr on it's panel?
If you don't know about the Markaz and its panel of high-ranking scholars, as well as its endorsement by the office of the grand Marjeʿ, you may need to do some homework and read up on: aqaed.net/about.
Also we would invite you to read the profile of this Ayatullah which our respected Sayyid has translated and included in his paper, and then tell us what in it makes him look like a low level or low ranking scholar to you:
Profile of Ayatullah Shaykh Muḥammad al-Hādī al-Yūsufī al-Gharawī
Ayatullah Shaykh Muḥammad Hādī al-Yūsufī al-Ghrawī was born in 1948 CE (1368 AH) in Najaf al-Ashraf. In 1960 CE (1380 AH), he began studying Arabic under the guidance of his late father, Āyatullāh Shaykh Mīrzā Maḥmūd al-Yūsufī al-Ghrawī. After completing the introductory, intermediate, and advanced stages of the Ḥawza curriculum by 1968 CE (1388 AH), Shaykh al-Yūsufī al-Ghrawī began attending higher-level, advanced classes (Baḥth al-Khārij) in Islamic jurisprudence and principles of jurisprudence (Uṣūl al-Fiqh).
He studied Fiqh (jurisprudence) and Uṣūl al-Fiqh (principles of jurisprudence) under the late Grand Ayatullāh Sayyid Abū al-Qāsim al-Khūʾī (d. 1413 AH/1992 CE). Additionally, he studied the Fiqh al-muʿāmalāt (jurisprudence of transactioons) under the late Imam al-Khomeinī (d. 1409 AH/1989 CE), focusing on topics such as sales and contractual options (mabāḥith al-bayʿ wa al-khiyārāt).
In 1971 CE (1391 AH), Shaykh al-Yūsufī al-Ghrawī was exiled to Iran, where he moved to Qum. There, he attended lessons in Fiqh and Uṣūl under Ayatullāh Sayyid Muḥammad Ṣādiq al-Rūḥānī and continued his studies with Āyatullāh Sayyid Kāẓim al-Ḥusaynī al-Ḥāʾirī until around 1990 CE (1410 AH).
Shaykh al-Yūsufī al-Ghrawī has taught various subjects in both Najaf and Qum, including Arabic literature, logic, Uṣūl al-Fiqh (principles of jurisprudence), and Fiqh (Islamic jurisprudence). In Najaf, he taught works such as al-Tabṣirah, al-Mukhtaṣar al-Nāfiʿ, and Sharḥ al-Lumaʿatayn. In Qum, he taught Arabic grammar, Islamic beliefs, and Islamic concepts at the Gulpāyigānī School and the Institute for Islamic Studies.
Following the Islamic Revolution, he taught at Ḥawza Ḥujjatiyya and Imam Khomeinī School, where he focused on Islamic history, Ḥadīth, Nahj al-Balāghah, Qurʾānic sciences, and advanced jurisprudence (mabāḥith al-makāsib). Shaykh al-Yūsufī al-Ghrawī also lectured on Islamic thought, principles of faith, Qurʾānic sciences, and Ḥadīth at various institutions, including the Islamic Revolutionary Guard’s School of Doctrinal and Political Education, the Faculty of Theology and Qurʾānic Sciences in Qum and Dezfūl, and he continues to contribute to the field of Qurʾānic exegesis and Islamic studies.
He is also a prolific author and erudite researcher with some very insightful and beneficial works to his credit such as his 8 volume encylopaedia on Islamic history entitled موسوعة التاريخ الإسلامي (Encylopaedia of Islamic History), his study of the status of women in Jāhiliyyah and Islam entitled المرأة في الجاهلية والإسلام (Woman in Jāhiliyyah and Islam), as well as his scholarly annotated edition of the Maqtal of Abū Mikhnaf entitled وقعة الطف (The Battle of Ṭaff).
He has also authored a monograph on the history of Ḥadīth entitled من تاريخ الحديث رواية وكتابة إلى عهد معاوية (Glimpses from the History of Ḥadīth, its transmission and transcription until the period of Muʿāwiyah), and an anthology of reliable and verified supplications entitled منهاج الحياة في الأدعية والزيارات عن أهل بيت الهداة (A Syllabus for Life in Supplications and Visitational Recitals from the Guides of the Ahl al-Bayt).
He has also delivered some very beneficial lectures series and participated in some hard-hitting interviews and podcasts which are available online such as his podcast on the Mukhtārnāmeh in which he pointed out that the Mukhtār series had very many historically inaccurate and false portrayals , as well as other lectures.
I am supporting you from Dodoma.
Plz brother I request you exposed Hassan Allahyari videos and his allegations against nabi karim Saw biwi and KHULFA rasdeeen and other's saaba r ۔z ۔۔ you refute in english language ۔but you used Urdu subtitles understanding Urdu hindi people Hassan Allahyari is biggest fitna ۔۔۔۔ countinue great job ۔may Allah swt bless you and increase your knowledge give you success in noble cause ameen ۔۔۔
Sheikh Allahyar will destroy this Bakri
Brother, you say some truth but you twist other issues to achieve your aim of dismantling Imams. You lie sometimes but you do it in a way that's difficult to see quickly. Your claims are misguided and you know it. Please stop and abandon your goal.
Can you give some examples of his clever, hard-to-detect lies?
@@mhholmez he claimed that there is no mention of 12 imams in basair darajat. This is a clear manipulation...the book mentioned 12, it just used another word instead of imam.
@@AbuAyoka
It seems you have been deceived by anti-Islaah propaganda and have jumped to conclusions based on mere hearsay without investigating deeper.
When we contacted our respected Sayyid about this matter a while back, he explained to us that first of all, the claim in question is not his own, but rather that of higher level critical scholarship, so even if it were wrong or false, the fault would be with the higher level scholarship, and he wouldn't be a liar for pointing to the view of that higher level scholarship even if it were wrong. To be a liar, you need to make a claim on your own authority which you know to be false, and our Sayyid has never done that.
Secondly, the claim of the higher level scholarship he was referring to is not even false. It is actually true, because the higher level scholarship has conclusively shown how those narrations which claim the number of the Imams to be 12 are actually backward projections and fabricated interpolations.
If you want to see the evidence for this, the respected Sayyid has promised to showcase it and explain it in detail when he responds to the doubts raised by Bayat al-Ghadir channel inshallah.
So don't get carried away by their false claims and character assassination without hearing what the other side has to say.
@@AbuAyoka
We did ask the respected Sayyid about this a while back when Bayatul Ghadir had first made this allegation against him, and he responded by pointing out that first of all, this is not his personal claim or something he has come up with from his pocket, rather it is the claim of higher level critical academic as well as seminarian scholarship, so even if it were wrong, it wouldn't make him a liar, because to be a liar, you need to claim something which is the opposite of what you know to be true, whereas our respected Sayyid is not claiming something here on his own accord, rather he is merely reflecting and presenting what independent scholarship has said, so whether their conclusion is right or wrong, the Sayyid cannot be accused of lying either way so long as he accurately presents their view.
Secondly, the respected Sayyid revealed to us that the conclusion of the higher level scholarship in this matter is not even false, because he has proof that reports about 12 Imams found in modern editions of Basair are fabrications which have been interpolated into Basair al-Darajaat as well as other books, so the claim of the higher level academic scholarship is not even false to begin with, and therefore, the respected Sayyid cannot be accused of lying from any angle at all.
The lesson you should learn from this is not to rush to conclusions and not trust any random bunch of polemicists when they make tall claims or try to character assassinator sincere scholars by accusing them of being liars. Rather, you should have patience and investigate the matter, and especially hear out the other side before making up your own mind.
When our respected Sayyid will issue his responses to Bayat al-Ghadir, you will get to see the evidence he has which shows he has not lied about any such claim.
@@Al-Islaah What is important is for you guys to abandon your aim of dismantling Imama. It is impossible to dismantle Imama and I believe you know it, because it is a decree and design of Allah. Why do you call yourselves Shia if you do not believe in Imama? Why did the prophet say follow ahlulbayt if Imama is not truth? why are there groups of Shia since the beginning of Islamic history if Imama is false?.........etc
If Imama is false why did the content of the last letter of Imam Mahdi consistent with hadiths of the Prophet, the companions and the Imams before....collected by shia and sunni....That proves the hadiths mentioning 12 imams and their names are not fabrications.
Referring to some high level scholars is of no use. There are high level Shia scholars who have indirectly allowed homosexuality; there are those who say you can marry babies and fondle them with the private part etc.....these are brothers of shayateen who have eaten khums of the poor into their bellies........don't be like them.