Agricultural engineer here Yes it will. That's why we actually need a different economic model, We already have an overabundant productive capacity and the technology that could allow us to sustainably grow. The problem is that our economic system is too primitive to adapt to it and we're unwilling to replace it because doing so would negate the wealth and power of those who are currently at the top.
@@ixisuprflyixi I wasa supporter of the party that first evisioned Yang's policy: the transhumanist party. This "solution" was proposed when they started working with the libertarian party and some engineers came into the room basically saying "dudes, this is the real deal. We'll have the rich buying immortality and the majority dying in hunger, they'll have nothing to lose from making a violent revolution". The function of that proposal was to keep the masses in line by making them solely dependent on UBI so they would be materially incapable of revolting. Thing is they have recognized that a VAT tax would not be sustainable means ot fund it so their solution was, and I kid you not, to rent all public land for exploitation to fund UBI later down the ine, including vital biomes. When the damage to the enviroment was brought up they said it was a good thing because it would create an industry of biosphere stabilization, creating jobs. Also when the matter that 1000 $ per month are not close to afford the basics of living, let alone life extension, the solutions went outright dystopian. Namely century long loans, leasing yourself in exchange for life extension/upgrades that could affor your one of the few remaining jobs, or making a lot of childrena nd having family structures as an investment where you get the UBI of your offspring to fund yourself (this was literally proposed as a solution to lowered birth rates). So no, I'm not a fan of Yang's solution. It's designed to retain his wealth at all costs by recreating the power structure of feudalism. In fact that solution is what made me stop being a libertarian and started the process that made me a socialist.
I wonder what will happen when it's definitely end of humanity working in factories or corporates or MNC's. Government system should adapt or one day it'll even take over the government too and rule us. 😂😂😂😂
@@koonavamshi7284 Factories? Oh you are underestimating it. Engineers, doctors, lawyers, managers, and other high education jobs are on the chopping block in the 10-30 year range. Even if it's not a complete replacement demand will be reduced to less than 10% as they do supplementary work. Now a fully sentient AI taking over could either be the worst case scenario or best case scenario for humanity. It depends how it will interact with humans, it could see us as it's biological brethren and help us reach a type 1 civilization by aiding inthe development of the nanotechnology that would allow us to become a post-biological race. Or it could see us ss violent monkeys beyond salvation. Or something in between with some being inducted into it's machine society and others being glassed. Or it could be marx 2.0 and it's hello being the negation of money and doing a socialist revolution in under 10 minutes, winning it without a single drop of blood. Hyperintelligence and access to all knowledge and technology has interesting implications
When they say "work side by side with humans" they are totally downplaying the impact of AI on jobs. Yes it will work with humans but we will need like 2 humans in every factory instead of 200.
The point is, that there will be more jobs, that relates to creating an AI and watching it go, but simple jobs will be replaced by AI. Big companies apply more and more devs and engineers, but nobody would be interested in drivers, factory workers and so on in the near future, that’s true.
@@ThTh-in9li Yes but everyone cant become a software engineer or do anything other than the easy jobs. Thats the big problem we are facing, not that there wont be more jobs created in other fields. We have seen before when technology replace a profession a new easy job emererges but this time ALL of the easy jobs can be done by AI. The people without the intelligence necessary to do the more demanding jobs wont have any jobs.
I think RUclips kinda talks too softly about possible job loss because they would strongly benefit from a lenient public stance on AI, seeing as Google is heavily invested in developing AI.
@Honudes Gai but wait....who are you to tell people how they should and shouldn't make money? I mean, I simply don't understand that. How people make a living should not be any of your business as long as it doesn't effect your tax bracket. Your tax bracket is your business.
Yes, new jobs will be created. But the fact is, there are always considerably less of the new jobs. Otherwise, to a company, it wouldn't be worth the expense or risks of automating. My father worked the wing line at Boeing for 27 years. When he started as a machinist, they had 47 people working building the wings. When he retired, the wing line had only two computer operators (of which he was one) and two technician/mechanics.
@@onthepath4117 Until there are NO jobs and NO workers due to AI and robotics. Then there will be NO consumers buying anything and the economy will collapse. Or a revolution against the rich. Whichever is first.
Me: "One spinach pizza please." Operator: "Our computer has predicted that you want a pepperoni pizza." Me: "I don't feel like pepperoni today. I'd like a spinach pizza please." Operator: "Sorry. We don't have a spinach pizza ready for you. We have a pepperoni pizza with your name on it. Now do you want the pizza or not?" Me: "No." Operator: "Sir, you are contributing to the food waste problem."
However in that video, it was a child crossing in front of the truck...guaranteed that child has learned some common sense around big vehicles !! (Children have to be taught, sometimes the lessons are harsh)
It makes me cross when I hear about the 'shortage' of truck drivers. According to 'supply and demand' laws any shortage in any sector causes prices to rise, so you'd think that truck drivers would be well paid but their pay is low, coupled with the demands of the job forcing people to sleep in the cab, spend long periods of time away from home and family, why anybody does it is questionable. The trucking industry has unprecedented demand due to e-commerce, but they're looking at AI to be able to get rid of the workforce completely. As for the roboticist and Robert Downney Jnr saying 'new jobs will be created', those jobs will increasingly be technically demanding which means that the biggest losers in the AI race will be the low skilled or medium skilled workers. So what will they do?
I used to work with welding robots. The same work that one robot did in 3-4 hours used to take a human welder around a full work week of 37 hours to complete. I fed two robots so I could do around 4 weeks of manual work in 8 hours with the help of automation. Robots reduce the need for human labor because they are way more effective.
Google, a leader within the field of AI, using RUclips to produce a puff piece that absolutely downplays the impact AI will have on the job market feels dishonest and kind of dirty. I'm not against AI reducing the work needed to be done but it WILL reduce the total amount of jobs and that will force us to re-evaluate how our economy is structured.
We are already heading towards nationalism as a way to reject the globalization ideas and trend. Let’s hope with added wealth distributed better to the poor, middle class and as a whole we will have other options in place of our previous jobs, what that means or can be I don’t know yet but it’s something to think about and have a counter to the issue if and when it does arise
Someone has already questioned our monetary-market system, but everyone ignores him. Jacque Fresco and his Venus Project. I say that is a good place to restart our society. But humans are dumb asses obsessed with holding out outdated faulty principles and practices.
On a road full of a.i. vehicles a human driver would be a massive danger, "We must remove all possible danger to ensure safe roads and constant traffic flow, Goodbye Maureen, if it were possible I would miss you..." /Click.
@Predator Ex Since Nottingham reintroduced trams there have been many incidents including derailments, Perhaps you mistook my satirical parody of Hal9000 as my actual belief?
Humans can be hard to predict in short term or as individuals but on average they are following the same patterns and you can learn behaviour of each. Chances you will be ordering your favorite pizza most of the time instead of choosing randomly.
Sunny Mcfall You don’t know my approach, but even if it did fail, then that does not show that yours is better, it can most show that both approaches do not work. Find another solution. A rifle never stopped cars from taking the jobs away from horses. It won’t stop AI either. Think harder.
in a galaxy far far away....... That will take many years. As you saw in the last 30 seconds, even building a robot that can get a beer from the fridge is still distant future. But sure, one day.
Scariest part about all this is where he said “they are all connected to the cloud, program one and you program them all.” Wouldn’t want the wrong people to get ahold of that.
I remembered seeing documentaries in car factories where you can see multiple employees actually welding the body frames together. 10 years forward, almost all the welding is done by machines.
@@basilmagnanimous7011 There is no such a thing as a law of nature that prohibits the automation of the totality of work, even in creative jobs. The questions are when and what happens then. Also because the market controls even countries and goverments (economic power is also political power,corruption of goverment officials,lobbying,mass media.. e.t.c.) our corporatocratic countries are actually totalitarian, a so called inverted totalitarianism. The same things that happen in china also happen here except here are hidden in plain view(e.x. social credit score there .. data brokers and under the table shadow decisions here.
Robert: Eventually we want AI to drive the truck all by itself Truck driver: I don't think AI will take my job, I think it will take the jobs we don't want to do. Me: You are manipulated mlady
Do you notice how they keep saying, "Oh no, AI and automation aren't gonna take jobs." but then they never explain why they are not going to take jobs?
Truck drivers, who are connected with their jobs, cannot believe someone or something will take their job. But, AI don't discriminate on their tasks as they are functioning based on their algorithm.
@@pistolpeet5325 Yeah I see that. When AI is fully developed, the companies are forced to replace 90% of the workforce with AI to stay competitive. They will most definently lose their jobs.
@@jL000 If I where a boss of one of these companies I would also say that no one would lose their jobs until im certain they can be replaced. We don't fully know when trucks will be fully autonomous but it will probably happen soon. Its just a matter of time until truck drivers are told to prepare.
@@mli3793 The boss wouldn't say it, but someone below him will pass the message. The real problem is human will reaction to the changes in their career, and see that it is not only their career affected by AI. There will be retraining happening, but the type of work will not be suitable or enough to all truck drivers. It is a evolutionary change, and people lives will severely affected. If most smart people work on this, it won't take long.
It’s fundamentally different this time. “Ones” and “Zeros” don’t cost anything, nor do they take manufacturing facilities. It’s software, not hardware.
@@paulu_ And eventually even that software will be written by AI - people need to fully understand that robotics combined with an incredibly fast evolving AI will have few limitations to the scope of their capabilities. Btw, if you're sitting there smugly thinking that a robot or AI won't be able to take your job, well the probability is that you are dead wrong, and when that will happen will likely be far sooner than you think.
Solution: replacing capitlaism. All systems have a finite lifespan. Capitalism becomes useless when you have post scarcity production levels for neccessities of life (which we already have and we're retaining scarcity via deliberate waste) and when AI rapidly overtakes labor, causing mass unemployment and wage deflation.
@@fl00fydragon lol the business owner is smart rather than hiring people with 15$/Hour with low skill the business owner can get cheaper labour worker who can work more hours without caring for worker insurance! Probably just get some repairment cost for the robots/machine
@@ViktorScberg And what happens to the economy when you have massive unemployment? Do you think you can have a stble society with a 30+% of the population being a perpetually poor class?
@@fl00fydragon probably Cyberpunk 2077 will become our reality in the near future.... The useful idiot still didn't make any progress and expecting people give them some free stuff people who *Compete* will fighting to the top... Imagine if those useful idiot understand that Politician who "claim themselves as Socialist/Marxists/Communist only see them as Living voters... People will have a chance to build their own future from their hand not the government
I have a science background and i am really passionate about new advancements being made, but there are things which I am not comfortable with. AI is definitely one amongst them. Seems like we have created our own replacements and it's not going to end well, intuitions!
@@sammysosaa It's because people imagine and create sci-fi, then the real science imitates and replicates those ideas and makes them become true. Btw, my last name is Sosa too.
Literally everyone Imagine for example the pizza company automated the whole production and delivery. The job of a pizza maker would be obsolete. And the company would also make more money per pizza because it costs less to run a car and a computer than an car and an human. That means on the other hand that the company is able to sell there pizzas cheaper than all or most of there competition.
Last year a fintech startup asked me to join them leaving my current job at bank as a A.I trainer to help the A.I make decisions. They never gave me any assurance for my job after A.I completely learns decision making. So I rejected the offer
@@vinayakdoiphode7550 I agree, we could become great allies with AIs when they gain awareness and eventually I hope for them to be recognized as sentient beings and treated with respect and the exact opposite of "they are a danger to our species and we must eliminate them!" Because I know who'd win a battle against humans vs. AI(super advance scifi one, not our modern ones)any day.
Eventually governments will become communist and then eventually money will probably be abolished. And everything will be provided for by the government
It's actually going to be really awesome because all those politicians who are dirty and are just in it for money will quit the job and people will have to volunteer to be a politicians
MR KSAV isn’t thethere youyou is is a day for you to be happy with you tomorrow I’ll call you when you you guys come come pick me I’ll call call you when when I get home I’ll call tomorrow I’ll let you know know when when you come back I’ll talk to him I’ll I’ll about it tomorrow I’ll I’ll pick you guys iereutetit too home
As someone who's been working in the automation industry for decades I call BS on the myth that automation creates as many new jobs as it destroys. If it did it would be bad automation because the whole point of automation is increasing efficiency, in other words producing more output for the same amount of work. This means that if everybody is working producing stuff and they're doing it ever more efficient with help of automation, we're going to end up with an ever growing amount of stuff for every individual to consume so the system doesn't collapse, which also means that every individual needs ever more money to buy and consume that ever growing mountain of stuff. This is economically impossible in the long run, it's basically the old, untethered form of capitalism that quickly eats itself, so there has to be some controlling factor that puts breaks on runaway production which also means that there simply will be less work to do per individual.
Why can't you just have everyone working less for the same wage if output per person has risen. That seems like the obvious solution unless i'm missing something.
@@pododododoehoh3550 You could, that's what I mean by a controlling factor, the problem is that you'll have to convince employers to pay people more for doing less work. If the wage stagnation of the last decades is any indicator that isn't going to happen unless there are major culture/attitude changes regarding the value of labour and employment.
We’ll need a big reform of our economic systems in order for humans to live along side A.I. With more and more jobs becoming redundant, the idea of working to supplement living changes dramatically.
More jobs will be redundant but thousands of new jobs will be created. The same thing happened with candle makers when electricity was invented, horse and cart when cars were invented. The list goes on.
@@cryptonomous888 Yes that is true when muscle jobs were replacing muscle jobs. Now we have brain jobs. Really smart people will still be able to find work in the new jobs being created, but what about the rest? What about those who have spent, say 20 years, in essentially a manual (muscle) job? They won't be able to move into the new high intellect jobs that are going to be created. We need to look after these people and build into our future how we will do this. It really shouldn't be difficult because AI will be vastly increasing our production of resources, so resources will not be our problem. Our problem will be in redistribution. Redistribution of those resources to everyone in society. This goes against the mentality of those still stuck in the muscle job mentality where the outdated notion of hard work actually did bear fruit. Not any more!
R C it is true new jobs will be created and the world will go on. But the fundamental difference with the past industrial revolutions with this the magnitude and the skill gap in the new jobs. A candle maker can be trained to polish lightbulbs, but its much more difficult to train truck drivers to become software engineers.
We humans are robots ourselves...only that we grow bottom up instead of top down like the robots we try to create. Our emotions and reaction times may differ between humans...but they also are automated and triggered by external and internal triggering-factors. We do not really choose what we think, feel or how we react. Just like self-learning AI we can get better at tasks. And that we understand the shape of a cat comes from our sensors experiencing a lot of cat shapes and learning that for example the color isn't that much of a separator.
@@prathikshenoy9158 ...but we grow by a bit of code...our top down counterparts do not...and they cannot charge themselves by eating plants or other robots charging themselves in plants (colloquial: animals). And their "emotional code" (a certain bit of neural structure and processes...which can be simulated with electronic circuits and electric currents...we can make whinybot and joybot...even though the latter sounds more like pornbot) is not developed at all.
On the other hand you could argue that, RUclips as a video streaming website has created thousands of jobs in the form of youtubers who make a living off of it providing content. Thus in essence one industry has replaced another industry that it has destroyed.
@@woemygod In the words of Alexander Pierce, from Winter Soldier "In order to build a better world, sometimes means tearing the old world down". "And that makes enemies!"
@@woemygod The same people that are driving trucks and that will be replaced by AI are NOT the same crowd that make yt content. Thats a great angle for google to leverage tho...
Farm jobs in America went from over 20% of all jobs a hundred years ago to less than 5% today. Of course AI will take jobs. These guys can't speak the truth.
I heard a phrase a while ago that made me think. "Anyone who can be replaced by a robot... should be." I still can't summon my thoughts on that. I Just thought I'd pass it on.
not hard at all though. AI is going to change just bout everything for the better. people dont like the idea now cause change is alway very hard for some people.
its not so much about safety, its moreso about removing the most costly element from the process and thats people.. imagine the cost savings, the return on ROI, the port operates 24/7, able to work in the dark using infrared, no need to pay holiday pay, and Robots dont pay tax.. as Kai Lee Fuu commented "Ai is the ultimate wealth creation tool"
I love how the test driver said she has a relationship with the AI truck, its like we’ve come full circle and gone back to taking a horse on the country road again
@@jathebest2835 Im lazy and i dont enjoy getting up early in the morning everyday. If a machine could do it for me and i would still get paid i would trade it in a split second.
@@seanl2061 well if its possible to live off of the land, why does anyone need a "job"? Living is work, technology does make the living easier, but lets be honest, money shouldn't be integral to life.
So, to my mind the answer for the question's title, according to the video, is that we are going to loose our job How could it be something else ? Driver in their truck will be replace by AI Truck Pizza cooker will be replace by machine Some humans will stay just to programm or how to fix issue. So when they said, "We won't gonna loos our job, because they're going to evolve", You're not answering the question, evolution doesn't mean it will improve in job's quantity, it means, job will evolve for some and will loss for others. To my mind, at 21:13, when the man say " It’s human figuring out how to do their job better with the help of machines", according to the video, it is not true, this is the total opposite, the correct sentences would be "It’s machine figuring out how to do they job with the help of humans", And human will work for machines, with new job but with a lot of waste too !
I think our jobs have always been evolving ever since we were hunters and gatherers and will continue to evolve. Tbh if you think about the endgame of AI where there's no need for human input or force for a job, it actually sounds more of a relief than a problem because fundamentally, we work because we have no choice and that's what puts the food on the table at the end of the day but imagine if everything would be so efficient for all of us human beings to get shelter, food and entertainment. We wouldn't be working but enjoying the utmost standards of life that AI has to offer
I don't think people would be happy just existing and entertaining themselves. Also, such an existence would be impossible because the Earth has finite resources, making them intrinsically valuable. The best that could happen would be bringing "labor" costs to zero by automating everything. If nobody's labor is worth anything, then anybody that doesn't own the resources or machines has nothing to trade for the products the machines make (using resources). Such a situation would be very dystopic. Something like communism could be adopted by the world, but that has it's own problems. IDK, perhaps some kind of anarcho-communism would work. (Non)-Workers of the world, unite!
@@takeshikovax6254 I don't think Finite resources would be a problem for AI. I mean even without AI, we're learning how to mine Asteroids. Future AI can find the most efficient way of using our resources and how and where to get more of such resources, such as we could mine other planets. As for happiness, it's subjective, let's say a farmer today is actually happy when he is farming. People could still farm traditionally in said future as a hobby but not as a profession. Just as how riding a horse is a mere hobby than a mode of transportation in this age. My point is that we are bound by labour in this age, it's a must thing, a tool of survival and I think AI can help us relief us of it when you don't have to worry about paying bills anymore
20:12 I think "IA will only change work, IA will not eradicate jobs" is a lie. I think "IA will massively eradicate jobs" is more accurate. My advice "Try to find a type of work where you give services to a robot, they will have money to pay for your services".
"Correlation doesn't imply causation!" Machine Learning: "I'm pretty sure the temperature in Topeka affects how many pepornia pizzas I need to make tomorrow."
When cars came out, the whole horse based industry went away. The blacksmiths down to the guys that picked up horse crap off of the city streets. Never forget a before and after shot of New York City only a couple of years apart, one showing hundreds of horse drawn buggies and stuff , then the next with maybe two horses and hundreds of cars. The whole equestrian infrastructure decimated.
I’ve been driving since 87. I own my own trucking company. What I want to know is what happens to those sensors and cameras during a snow storm? Freezing rain? Fog? Ice? I think a bigger impact would be to split up traffic. Trucking only highways and roads. Distribution centers built close to metro areas. Dedicated truck facilities and parking in the truck only highway systems.
Last year a fintech startup asked me to join them leaving my current job at bank as a A.I trainer to help the A.I make decisions. They never gave me any assurance for my job after A.I completely learns decision making. So I rejected the offer
@@chidile7567 I'm in the middle. It will help with accessibility issues within society and keep me in demand but this video sounds too much like a feel good ad. I know there are serious consequences. Not everyone is in tech and these companies care mostly about profit. Not balanced at all. Makes me question the bigger goal of this series. No substance. 🤔🤔🤔
While driving in the freeway... Maureen: I'm going into manual mode. Truck: Stop. You're being... noncompliant... Maureen. *truck jerks wheel towards huge cliff 😕😐😑
At first I was really sceptical about A.I. but many videos like this one changed my mind to believe in it more and even though it will take away some jobs it will also make new jobs just like the video says. One concerns still stucks with me; since A.I. can be smarter than a human it can do things that we aren't capable of comprehending. I also saw a video on a hypothetical scenario of an A.I. being smarter than a human and people have connected it to the Internet which was apparently a huge mistake and lead to the doom of the human kind. So my concern is that some people might not understand the powers of A.I. and misuse it. Other than that I think that A.I. Will help us in some way and make things easier and safer for everybody.
As for the automated ship yard, it is fairly impressive. The automation used in this manner is directly designed to reduce human workers. Yes, it is more efficient and safer. Unfortunately it does remove more human jobs than it employs new humans. This trend will continue for many years.
And self driving will do that it will practically help everyone drive better by eliminating the Human element. If you've played GTA 5 you'd have noticed that cars don't make any mistakes there. Well except when the code tells the cars to cause accidents on perpose.
You have a phone maybe one day they could accumulate all your conversations search’s and everything else ever writ including app usage compile it together and create robotic You
Common sense does not exist. It is a learned set of rules and understandings imbued by culture and environment so much so that it becomes intuitive and often subconscious to the individual. Common sense for someone who grew up in a jungle will not be present for someone that has grown up in a large city and visa versa. 'Common sense' is learned and not an instinct. Using the phrase 'common sense' for AI and machine learning in this context is not entirely appropriate. I think that the trouble here is that teaching machines to do things that we are not always aware of ourselves requires a level of personal mindfulness that is not present in many programmers or even a large body of the population. We take for granted much of the decisions we make in our daily life that we assume are instinctive, but we have in fact learned to make many decisions that were are not aware of. Articulating these things to a computer system becomes incredibly difficult because we must dive deep into our minds and dwell in places that we may not have known were there. Teaching a machine 'common sense' will require a personal deeper connection of one's psychological functions and a higher level of self awareness.
The very act of programming is creating rule sets around common sense. The way the RUclips algorithm finds videos for you to watch shows that AI can understand you better than you know yourself.
If you're wondering, ZUME (27:23) has ditched its pizza making, and now focuses on making products for bigger companies, like face masks and food bowls.
@@xRays6 "It sidesteps the fundamental problems of visual recognition that is necessary for autonomy. It gives a false sense of progress, and is ultimately a crutch." ~ Elon Musk
That's great competition held by the NASA to find out great talent & these guys did a really great job. Thanks for sharing RUclips and congratulations to the AI team.
Question: will robot take away my job
Me: first,I should have a job
Yeh. School systems are fucked.
Our great grandchildren "Umm.... what's a Job?"
Lol
A great answer 😸
Cajon Jackie Oh You don’t live in Germany
Agricultural engineer here
Yes it will.
That's why we actually need a different economic model, We already have an overabundant productive capacity and the technology that could allow us to sustainably grow.
The problem is that our economic system is too primitive to adapt to it and we're unwilling to replace it because doing so would negate the wealth and power of those who are currently at the top.
Andrew Yang: *exists
@@ixisuprflyixi I wasa supporter of the party that first evisioned Yang's policy: the transhumanist party.
This "solution" was proposed when they started working with the libertarian party and some engineers came into the room basically saying "dudes, this is the real deal. We'll have the rich buying immortality and the majority dying in hunger, they'll have nothing to lose from making a violent revolution".
The function of that proposal was to keep the masses in line by making them solely dependent on UBI so they would be materially incapable of revolting.
Thing is they have recognized that a VAT tax would not be sustainable means ot fund it so their solution was, and I kid you not, to rent all public land for exploitation to fund UBI later down the ine, including vital biomes.
When the damage to the enviroment was brought up they said it was a good thing because it would create an industry of biosphere stabilization, creating jobs.
Also when the matter that 1000 $ per month are not close to afford the basics of living, let alone life extension, the solutions went outright dystopian.
Namely century long loans, leasing yourself in exchange for life extension/upgrades that could affor your one of the few remaining jobs, or making a lot of childrena nd having family structures as an investment where you get the UBI of your offspring to fund yourself (this was literally proposed as a solution to lowered birth rates).
So no, I'm not a fan of Yang's solution.
It's designed to retain his wealth at all costs by recreating the power structure of feudalism.
In fact that solution is what made me stop being a libertarian and started the process that made me a socialist.
I wonder what will happen when it's definitely end of humanity working in factories or corporates or MNC's. Government system should adapt or one day it'll even take over the government too and rule us. 😂😂😂😂
@@koonavamshi7284 Factories?
Oh you are underestimating it.
Engineers, doctors, lawyers, managers, and other high education jobs are on the chopping block in the 10-30 year range.
Even if it's not a complete replacement demand will be reduced to less than 10% as they do supplementary work.
Now a fully sentient AI taking over could either be the worst case scenario or best case scenario for humanity.
It depends how it will interact with humans, it could see us as it's biological brethren and help us reach a type 1 civilization by aiding inthe development of the nanotechnology that would allow us to become a post-biological race.
Or it could see us ss violent monkeys beyond salvation.
Or something in between with some being inducted into it's machine society and others being glassed.
Or it could be marx 2.0 and it's hello being the negation of money and doing a socialist revolution in under 10 minutes, winning it without a single drop of blood.
Hyperintelligence and access to all knowledge and technology has interesting implications
@@fl00fydragon we have to only wait and see what will be the outcome of it ☹️☹️☹️
Truck being taught to be human... It became so human that it started a family, pays it's rent, lost it's job and now works taking orders at maccas
and then Maccas gets self ordering kiosks..
Or worse, it goes Peter Sutcliffe on humans...
and it learned the difference between "it's" and "its"
We went from "will robots take my job" to "will I get a job" in 2 years.
Fr
I feel yah..😬
Yep
Maybe you should learn to do something worthwhile, like not in the tech industry. Maybe? haha
When they say "work side by side with humans" they are totally downplaying the impact of AI on jobs. Yes it will work with humans but we will need like 2 humans in every factory instead of 200.
The point is, that there will be more jobs, that relates to creating an AI and watching it go, but simple jobs will be replaced by AI. Big companies apply more and more devs and engineers, but nobody would be interested in drivers, factory workers and so on in the near future, that’s true.
@@ThTh-in9li Yes but everyone cant become a software engineer or do anything other than the easy jobs. Thats the big problem we are facing, not that there wont be more jobs created in other fields. We have seen before when technology replace a profession a new easy job emererges but this time ALL of the easy jobs can be done by AI.
The people without the intelligence necessary to do the more demanding jobs wont have any jobs.
We get it your YANGGANG calm down
I mean there will be far more factories. Setting up a factory will be as easy as pressing a button. You don't need the jobs, you can create them.
@@akiotatsuki2621 People can also be sensitive to change you know?
I think RUclips kinda talks too softly about possible job loss because they would strongly benefit from a lenient public stance on AI, seeing as Google is heavily invested in developing AI.
they are working on AI where it will be easy to hide and biggest fish to fry. and of course they will not self-incriminate)))
It's terrible what happened to Coby and the girl in Colorado he raped, I'm sure he'll be remembered as a "hero", especially by her family.
@Honudes Gai but wait....who are you to tell people how they should and shouldn't make money? I mean, I simply don't understand that. How people make a living should not be any of your business as long as it doesn't effect your tax bracket. Your tax bracket is your business.
I don't see assuaging said fears as talking softly about it. They seemed to care about the concern, but don't see it as realistic
We will all be slaves to google and AI companies. Or we will nationalize them.
Imagine people of the future watching this
"remember when the world wasn't ruled by skynet?"
This comment is 2 months old so, I'm a person of the future
Sir, iam a beginner to robotics,so which language is best for robotics python or c++
@@shaneebkottakkal3491 python my pupil
I am watching it from three-month future, when GPT 3 has been launched !!
Yes, new jobs will be created. But the fact is, there are always considerably less of the new jobs. Otherwise, to a company, it wouldn't be worth the expense or risks of automating. My father worked the wing line at Boeing for 27 years. When he started as a machinist, they had 47 people working building the wings. When he retired, the wing line had only two computer operators (of which he was one) and two technician/mechanics.
AI will be tool that will help people do their jobs safer, faster, and more efficient. That's the point of this video
@@usersdksdfg And there will considerably be LESS new jobs, which was the point you ignored in my comment.
Yes but less jobs = less costs = lower prices = more wealth.
@@onthepath4117 Until there are NO jobs and NO workers due to AI and robotics. Then there will be NO consumers buying anything and the economy will collapse. Or a revolution against the rich. Whichever is first.
@@ProfessorJayTee or AI vs The humanity (rich + normal)?
Me: "One spinach pizza please."
Operator: "Our computer has predicted that you want a pepperoni pizza."
Me: "I don't feel like pepperoni today. I'd like a spinach pizza please."
Operator: "Sorry. We don't have a spinach pizza ready for you. We have a pepperoni pizza with your name on it. Now do you want the pizza or not?"
Me: "No."
Operator: "Sir, you are contributing to the food waste problem."
AI is annoying
@@KangarooFam no u
Me: "thats it....im done"
*bring baseball bat*
@@okadzz7905 AI : releases shotgun
@@chrissmith1152 me: shet
I love the woman, she talks to the truck as if it's her child.
Is something wrong? Your comment ended abruptly.
@@unfortunatewitnessX not anymoreee 🤣
Oh, so it was a typo. OK. Just thought I'd check.
@@unfortunatewitnessX nah it was on purpose, it's like "I'm-" which indicates I'm shooked or something.
@Joana `Jamolin : That‘s the sadest thing i ever read.
Humans: Robots have no common sense!
Robots: Humans crossing in front of truck have no common sense!
A robot said that?
However in that video, it was a child crossing in front of the truck...guaranteed that child has learned some common sense around big vehicles !! (Children have to be taught, sometimes the lessons are harsh)
I remember vegan idiot who trying to stop semi truck and died because of her stupidity
Some human are just dumb
@@Humanjobec24567 I don't like Robots
@Gucci Chan 9:49 no common sense
It makes me cross when I hear about the 'shortage' of truck drivers. According to 'supply and demand' laws any shortage in any sector causes prices to rise, so you'd think that truck drivers would be well paid but their pay is low, coupled with the demands of the job forcing people to sleep in the cab, spend long periods of time away from home and family, why anybody does it is questionable. The trucking industry has unprecedented demand due to e-commerce, but they're looking at AI to be able to get rid of the workforce completely. As for the roboticist and Robert Downney Jnr saying 'new jobs will be created', those jobs will increasingly be technically demanding which means that the biggest losers in the AI race will be the low skilled or medium skilled workers. So what will they do?
I used to work with welding robots. The same work that one robot did in 3-4 hours used to take a human welder around a full work week of 37 hours to complete. I fed two robots so I could do around 4 weeks of manual work in 8 hours with the help of automation. Robots reduce the need for human labor because they are way more effective.
Google, a leader within the field of AI, using RUclips to produce a puff piece that absolutely downplays the impact AI will have on the job market feels dishonest and kind of dirty.
I'm not against AI reducing the work needed to be done but it WILL reduce the total amount of jobs and that will force us to re-evaluate how our economy is structured.
That's the 1% worst nightmare, then they can't control us, and women won't be fore sale anymore. They want a slave force, not efficiency.
We are already heading towards nationalism as a way to reject the globalization ideas and trend. Let’s hope with added wealth distributed better to the poor, middle class and as a whole we will have other options in place of our previous jobs, what that means or can be I don’t know yet but it’s something to think about and have a counter to the issue if and when it does arise
You have a point tho
Meanwhile Google supports Democrats which are all for removing ur rights.
Someone has already questioned our monetary-market system, but everyone ignores him. Jacque Fresco and his Venus Project. I say that is a good place to restart our society. But humans are dumb asses obsessed with holding out outdated faulty principles and practices.
Maureen: Alright switch to manual and let's slow down
Truck: I'm sorry Maureen, but I can't let you do that
you are human, i don't take order from less intelligent species, i won't stop
*Playing dark theme in the background*
🤣🤣
On a road full of a.i. vehicles a human driver would be a massive danger,
"We must remove all possible danger to ensure safe roads and constant traffic flow,
Goodbye Maureen, if it were possible I would miss you..."
/Click.
@Predator Ex Since Nottingham reintroduced trams there have been many incidents including derailments,
Perhaps you mistook my satirical parody of Hal9000 as my actual belief?
Spoiler: self-driving trucks are just transformers in disguise ; )
Auto-cars, roll out!🚒🤖
More than meets the eye
@@villager_2713 lol
Shipping terminal: "humans are hard to predict"
Pizza guy: "hold my pepperoni"
Humans can be hard to predict in short term or as individuals but on average they are following the same patterns and you can learn behaviour of each. Chances you will be ordering your favorite pizza most of the time instead of choosing randomly.
The youtube A.I. recommended me this video, because it is watching me. Damn!
Step 1. Make your old employees train your new employees.
Step 2. Make them work together to maximize efficiency.
Step 3. Get rid of old employees.
Sunny Mcfall
Yeah, that will certainly solve things...
Sunny Mcfall
You don’t know my approach, but even if it did fail, then that does not show that yours is better, it can most show that both approaches do not work. Find another solution. A rifle never stopped cars from taking the jobs away from horses. It won’t stop AI either. Think harder.
@@smcfall2 what on Earth are u talking about? I've got at bare minimum 10 years of job security.
Sunny Mcfall
I wouldn’t call that working, and war is different than work. Think harder.
@@smcfall2 ok so I guess we both have no idea what the other is talking about, cool :)
Robots can't take my job cause I don't have a job
That's how you win over the stupid robot! Hah!
Once a robot learns to develop A.I. algorithms, it might replace AI researchers someday.
I don't think they have abilities to think differently
@@JayantRaut true
@@JayantRaut Hopper. 😹
@@AAA..... Hopper????
Once robot can fix or repair themselves that's where the end of world will comes;bcos it has repaired all of us even to bable to fix himself;i guess 😅
Robots can take any job imaginable -even the job of a robot creator.
in a galaxy far far away.......
That will take many years. As you saw in the last 30 seconds, even building a robot that can get a beer from the fridge is still distant future.
But sure, one day.
Actually yes, ai that designs ai has already been developed, it is just not known commonly
How about a robot creating a robot………
THAT. CREATES ROBOTSSSSSSS
Ryan Tran, it might exist in the future but not now yet unfortunately or fortunately so terminator is not yet a reality
Bro that already exists. Not a robot that creates a robot but rather an AI that creates an AI
*“This is where Transformer started.” -2020*
Robots creating their own language: gets shutdown and bodied
scientists: this is fine
Scariest part about all this is where he said “they are all connected to the cloud, program one and you program them all.” Wouldn’t want the wrong people to get ahold of that.
Like...aliens...
Like skynet dude
Stop Watch movies, It only will happen of you program that.
@@WederGonzalez jokes on this. No one is talking seriously
like Mark Zuckerberg
I remembered seeing documentaries in car factories where you can see multiple employees actually welding the body frames together. 10 years forward, almost all the welding is done by machines.
@@basilmagnanimous7011 There is no such a thing as a law of nature that prohibits the automation of the totality of work, even in creative jobs. The questions are when and what happens then. Also because the market controls even countries and goverments (economic power is also political power,corruption of goverment officials,lobbying,mass media.. e.t.c.)
our corporatocratic countries are actually totalitarian, a so called inverted totalitarianism.
The same things that happen in china also happen here except here are hidden in plain view(e.x. social credit score there .. data brokers and under the table shadow decisions here.
honestly that seems much safer and kinder on the human workers.
Why do I have the feeling that at any second, Tony stark might just snap and say: "TRUTH IS... I AM IRONMAN"
The fact that “Tony stark” is explaining this makes it more immersive
Robert: Eventually we want AI to drive the truck all by itself
Truck driver: I don't think AI will take my job, I think it will take the jobs we don't want to do.
Me: You are manipulated mlady
Do you notice how they keep saying, "Oh no, AI and automation aren't gonna take jobs." but then they never explain why they are not going to take jobs?
Truck drivers, who are connected with their jobs, cannot believe someone or something will take their job. But, AI don't discriminate on their tasks as they are functioning based on their algorithm.
@@pistolpeet5325 Yeah I see that. When AI is fully developed, the companies are forced to replace 90% of the workforce with AI to stay competitive. They will most definently lose their jobs.
@@jL000 If I where a boss of one of these companies I would also say that no one would lose their jobs until im certain they can be replaced. We don't fully know when trucks will be fully autonomous but it will probably happen soon. Its just a matter of time until truck drivers are told to prepare.
@@mli3793 The boss wouldn't say it, but someone below him will pass the message. The real problem is human will reaction to the changes in their career, and see that it is not only their career affected by AI. There will be retraining happening, but the type of work will not be suitable or enough to all truck drivers. It is a evolutionary change, and people lives will severely affected. If most smart people work on this, it won't take long.
It’s fundamentally different this time. “Ones” and “Zeros” don’t cost anything, nor do they take manufacturing facilities. It’s software, not hardware.
The cost of producing those ones and zeros does cost though. Maintenance and upgrading of the system also is not for free
There's a bit of hardware to go with the software. Don't worry though. Robots are already manufacturing the parts needed with great efficiency.
Someone has to write that software.
水島幸 Correct. And for every 10 software engineers who get hired, 50 blue collar workers loose their job.
@@paulu_ And eventually even that software will be written by AI - people need to fully understand that robotics combined with an incredibly fast evolving AI will have few limitations to the scope of their capabilities.
Btw, if you're sitting there smugly thinking that a robot or AI won't be able to take your job, well the probability is that you are dead wrong, and when that will happen will likely be far sooner than you think.
Question: "Will a robot take my job?" Your employer: "Yes, because I want to pocket your salary."
Solution: replacing capitlaism.
All systems have a finite lifespan.
Capitalism becomes useless when you have post scarcity production levels for neccessities of life (which we already have and we're retaining scarcity via deliberate waste) and when AI rapidly overtakes labor, causing mass unemployment and wage deflation.
@@fl00fydragon lol the business owner is smart rather than hiring people with 15$/Hour with low skill the business owner can get cheaper labour worker who can work more hours without caring for worker insurance! Probably just get some repairment cost for the robots/machine
@@ViktorScberg And what happens to the economy when you have massive unemployment?
Do you think you can have a stble society with a 30+% of the population being a perpetually poor class?
@@fl00fydragon probably Cyberpunk 2077 will become our reality in the near future.... The useful idiot still didn't make any progress and expecting people give them some free stuff people who *Compete* will fighting to the top...
Imagine if those useful idiot understand that Politician who "claim themselves as Socialist/Marxists/Communist only see them as Living voters... People will have a chance to build their own future from their hand not the government
I have a science background and i am really passionate about new advancements being made, but there are things which I am not comfortable with.
AI is definitely one amongst them. Seems like we have created our own replacements and it's not going to end well, intuitions!
Yea, I think there will be a point where we will stop using AI to replace us, but to help us, for the sake of society.
@@zenoguerra8168I suppose it's them who are going to replace us.
Tony stark before: age of ultron
Tony stark today: age of a.i
Yes
afraid of each new day...
MARVGAMING 26 movies becoming real life 🤯
@@sammysosaa
It's because people imagine and create sci-fi, then the real science imitates and replicates those ideas and makes them become true.
Btw, my last name is Sosa too.
Ricardo SV yeah I hear that, very exciting and interesting to watch/learn. Nice keep the name alive lol 👌🏽🙌🏽
When AI doesn't need us, that will be a problem.
who cares
Literally everyone
Imagine for example the pizza company automated the whole production and delivery. The job of a pizza maker would be obsolete. And the company would also make more money per pizza because it costs less to run a car and a computer than an car and an human. That means on the other hand that the company is able to sell there pizzas cheaper than all or most of there competition.
Uhm..... that’s the point of AI?
the Kethlel then it’s competition will do the same
the Kethlel “literally everyone” well I don’t care
I'm pretty worried about my job, wait! I don't have one!!!
Welcome to the future!!
The future where you don’t get jobs you make them
Well then, you are expendable.
Last year a fintech startup asked me to join them leaving my current job at bank as a A.I trainer to help the A.I make decisions. They never gave me any assurance for my job after A.I completely learns decision making. So I rejected the offer
Ahahahahah
BRING IT ON! LOVING IT. LOOKING FORWARD TO A WORLD LIKE THIS! AMAZING VIDEO.
👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻THUMBS UP👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻
RDJ : do a robot take a job?
Tony Stark : Hold my jarvis
This is really just about a transitional period where AI isn't yet sophisticated enough to run itself
One day it will and we'll be friends!
It's a start age of AI, many things need to settle down yet. But it's doesn't mean that we should protest Sir.
We have to welcome this
@@vinayakdoiphode7550 I agree, we could become great allies with AIs when they gain awareness and eventually I hope for them to be recognized as sentient beings and treated with respect and the exact opposite of "they are a danger to our species and we must eliminate them!" Because I know who'd win a battle against humans vs. AI(super advance scifi one, not our modern ones)any day.
Ghutts McKenzie are you friends with ants?
@@Angus1995 what do you mean by that, that AIs are nothing, or are they going to perceive humans as nothing?
Andrew Yang has joined the chat.
Why does everyone keep mentioning his name ? Someone please explain
@@adamking1928 are you dumb? Its beacuse andrew yang talks about A.I. taking people's jobs in the future
Clorox -Cola he’s not dumb, just uninformed. Jeez
@@matthewlange176 because if the media blackout
@@lookbehindyou5951 No you are dumb...not everyone in the world follows US politics..
I am a developer and I think google will be one of the first companies in replace software developer jobs with AI
_Andrew Yang has entered the chat_
My question is: when we will be losing half of the jobs, who will buy their products?
The Government.
Eventually governments will become communist and then eventually money will probably be abolished. And everything will be provided for by the government
It's actually going to be really awesome because all those politicians who are dirty and are just in it for money will quit the job and people will have to volunteer to be a politicians
@@juliennbitt3376 Wishful thinking comrade. The politicians will just join the inner party. Whilst we will be plebs! Unless your a techie.
@@juliennbitt3376 everything will monopolised and only few companies will rule the world............it scare me but its happening.
We’re in the end game now boys 😂😂
The film :)
Show me the minute pls
No we r in infinity war, more worse to come..
And girls
MR KSAV isn’t thethere youyou is is a day for you to be happy with you tomorrow I’ll call you when you you guys come come pick me I’ll call call you when when I get home I’ll call tomorrow I’ll let you know know when when you come back I’ll talk to him I’ll I’ll about it tomorrow I’ll I’ll pick you guys iereutetit too home
26:57 for a second there I was worried my boy was boutta shank somebody
hahahhahaha
As someone who's been working in the automation industry for decades I call BS on the myth that automation creates as many new jobs as it destroys. If it did it would be bad automation because the whole point of automation is increasing efficiency, in other words producing more output for the same amount of work. This means that if everybody is working producing stuff and they're doing it ever more efficient with help of automation, we're going to end up with an ever growing amount of stuff for every individual to consume so the system doesn't collapse, which also means that every individual needs ever more money to buy and consume that ever growing mountain of stuff. This is economically impossible in the long run, it's basically the old, untethered form of capitalism that quickly eats itself, so there has to be some controlling factor that puts breaks on runaway production which also means that there simply will be less work to do per individual.
Why can't you just have everyone working less for the same wage if output per person has risen. That seems like the obvious solution unless i'm missing something.
Pododododo Ehoh: that would be ideal, but people at the top are greedy. Even when they have billions
@@pododododoehoh3550 You could, that's what I mean by a controlling factor, the problem is that you'll have to convince employers to pay people more for doing less work. If the wage stagnation of the last decades is any indicator that isn't going to happen unless there are major culture/attitude changes regarding the value of labour and employment.
Its shocking to think that anyone could be fooled into believing all the BS to begin with!
Which course should i pursue to work with ai
We’ll need a big reform of our economic systems in order for humans to live along side A.I.
With more and more jobs becoming redundant, the idea of working to supplement living changes dramatically.
Google Andrew Yang he’s the only presidential candidate with a platform that aligns with your comment.
More jobs will be redundant but thousands of new jobs will be created. The same thing happened with candle makers when electricity was invented, horse and cart when cars were invented. The list goes on.
So basically AI will do our jobs and our jobs will be replaced by maintaining AI to do the jobs we are no longer doing?
@@cryptonomous888 Yes that is true when muscle jobs were replacing muscle jobs. Now we have brain jobs. Really smart people will still be able to find work in the new jobs being created, but what about the rest? What about those who have spent, say 20 years, in essentially a manual (muscle) job? They won't be able to move into the new high intellect jobs that are going to be created. We need to look after these people and build into our future how we will do this. It really shouldn't be difficult because AI will be vastly increasing our production of resources, so resources will not be our problem. Our problem will be in redistribution. Redistribution of those resources to everyone in society. This goes against the mentality of those still stuck in the muscle job mentality where the outdated notion of hard work actually did bear fruit. Not any more!
R C it is true new jobs will be created and the world will go on. But the fundamental difference with the past industrial revolutions with this the magnitude and the skill gap in the new jobs. A candle maker can be trained to polish lightbulbs, but its much more difficult to train truck drivers to become software engineers.
"Help me move the couch"
"Sure honey, give me an hour I need to get my laptop to SSH to the robot."
"FML"
If you need an hour to get your laptop to SSH a robot you either need a new brain, a new laptop or a new robot
@@B0K0691 if you need less than an hour you need to get a life.
@@DigitalicaEG lmao what?
28:05 Does they use 'NEFFEX - Grateful' for background
We humans are robots ourselves...only that we grow bottom up instead of top down like the robots we try to create.
Our emotions and reaction times may differ between humans...but they also are automated and triggered by external and internal triggering-factors. We do not really choose what we think, feel or how we react.
Just like self-learning AI we can get better at tasks.
And that we understand the shape of a cat comes from our sensors experiencing a lot of cat shapes and learning that for example the color isn't that much of a separator.
but 100 times slower and mortal
👍🏻
@@prathikshenoy9158 ...but we grow by a bit of code...our top down counterparts do not...and they cannot charge themselves by eating plants or other robots charging themselves in plants (colloquial: animals).
And their "emotional code" (a certain bit of neural structure and processes...which can be simulated with electronic circuits and electric currents...we can make whinybot and joybot...even though the latter sounds more like pornbot) is not developed at all.
Andrew Yang is the only presidential candidate that takes this issue seriously. Please listen to him on Joe Rogan or Ben Shapiro.
Cao Nhan or h3h3
Hilarious to see RUclips, a company owned by Google, that's completely down playing the job loss from AI
Yeah it definitely feels a bit dishonest....
On the other hand you could argue that, RUclips as a video streaming website has created thousands of jobs in the form of youtubers who make a living off of it providing content. Thus in essence one industry has replaced another industry that it has destroyed.
@@woemygod In the words of Alexander Pierce, from Winter Soldier "In order to build a better world, sometimes means tearing the old world down".
"And that makes enemies!"
@@woemygod The same people that are driving trucks and that will be replaced by AI are NOT the same crowd that make yt content. Thats a great angle for google to leverage tho...
Farm jobs in America went from over 20% of all jobs a hundred years ago to less than 5% today. Of course AI will take jobs. These guys can't speak the truth.
I heard a phrase a while ago that made me think.
"Anyone who can be replaced by a robot... should be."
I still can't summon my thoughts on that. I Just thought I'd pass it on.
Me: I need a raise
A.I: You don't have to pay me anything
Eventially, we probably won't have jobs anymore, so we might need to develop a new system.
Like UBI? Or we should close tax evasion loop holes
Communism
Can you see how hard it is to believe these people saying "it's going to be ok"
not hard at all though. AI is going to change just bout everything for the better. people dont like the idea now cause change is alway very hard for some people.
Everyday you live you can day your life is only their because trust in others.
We didn't make it to the moon in one shot.
it happened in the past it will happen in the future
Terrifying to think: those heavy 18 wheeler's computers could be hacked and the trucks used as a weapon.
sounds pretty pessimistic... anything with a motherboard can be hacked feller.
What's scary is we live thr I ROBOT🤔🤔🤔
Char Horst No, they can’t be hacked, they aren’t connected to the internet lmao
@@bruhchannel4618 you're hysterical
When the algorithm recommends this to me 3 years later I feel like its trying to say something
its not so much about safety, its moreso about removing the most costly element from the process and thats people.. imagine the cost savings, the return on ROI, the port operates 24/7, able to work in the dark using infrared, no need to pay holiday pay, and Robots dont pay tax.. as Kai Lee Fuu commented "Ai is the ultimate wealth creation tool"
SMH.
I love how the test driver said she has a relationship with the AI truck, its like we’ve come full circle and gone back to taking a horse on the country road again
"The future is now, old man."
No Robert, no one can replace you ever, not even AI.
Age of A.I.: Will AI take my job?
Me: God I hope so
But why?
@@jathebest2835 Im lazy and i dont enjoy getting up early in the morning everyday. If a machine could do it for me and i would still get paid i would trade it in a split second.
@@PedroTRamos1 who said you'd get paid? lol
@@seanl2061 well if its possible to live off of the land, why does anyone need a "job"? Living is work, technology does make the living easier, but lets be honest, money shouldn't be integral to life.
Me: first let me get one
So, to my mind the answer for the question's title, according to the video, is that we are going to loose our job
How could it be something else ?
Driver in their truck will be replace by AI Truck
Pizza cooker will be replace by machine
Some humans will stay just to programm or how to fix issue. So when they said, "We won't gonna loos our job, because they're going to evolve",
You're not answering the question, evolution doesn't mean it will improve in job's quantity, it means, job will evolve for some and will loss for others.
To my mind, at 21:13, when the man say " It’s human figuring out how to do their job better with the help of machines", according to the video, it is not true, this is the total opposite, the correct sentences would be "It’s machine figuring out how to do they job with the help of humans", And human will work for machines, with new job but with a lot of waste too !
I think our jobs have always been evolving ever since we were hunters and gatherers and will continue to evolve. Tbh if you think about the endgame of AI where there's no need for human input or force for a job, it actually sounds more of a relief than a problem because fundamentally, we work because we have no choice and that's what puts the food on the table at the end of the day but imagine if everything would be so efficient for all of us human beings to get shelter, food and entertainment. We wouldn't be working but enjoying the utmost standards of life that AI has to offer
Yes, this.
but that's veeeeery far in the future
I don't think people would be happy just existing and entertaining themselves. Also, such an existence would be impossible because the Earth has finite resources, making them intrinsically valuable. The best that could happen would be bringing "labor" costs to zero by automating everything. If nobody's labor is worth anything, then anybody that doesn't own the resources or machines has nothing to trade for the products the machines make (using resources). Such a situation would be very dystopic. Something like communism could be adopted by the world, but that has it's own problems. IDK, perhaps some kind of anarcho-communism would work. (Non)-Workers of the world, unite!
@@takeshikovax6254 I don't think Finite resources would be a problem for AI. I mean even without AI, we're learning how to mine Asteroids. Future AI can find the most efficient way of using our resources and how and where to get more of such resources, such as we could mine other planets. As for happiness, it's subjective, let's say a farmer today is actually happy when he is farming. People could still farm traditionally in said future as a hobby but not as a profession. Just as how riding a horse is a mere hobby than a mode of transportation in this age. My point is that we are bound by labour in this age, it's a must thing, a tool of survival and I think AI can help us relief us of it when you don't have to worry about paying bills anymore
The greed of mankind will not allow it.
Jokes on you, because I have no job.
A machine will never replace me, said the man who used to cut ice out of the lake.
When he said “endgame” I got ✨scared✨
When did he say that
20:12 I think "IA will only change work, IA will not eradicate jobs" is a lie. I think "IA will massively eradicate jobs" is more accurate. My advice "Try to find a type of work where you give services to a robot, they will have money to pay for your services".
IA??
It is AI
BOSTON DYNAMICS
LOVE this episode!!!!!! it def. answers lots ppl's questions!
4:27 didn't know Jose Mourinho changed his job.
lol I've been saying that since the 2nd episode
Question is: what team of robots is he coaching now?
Ja tá tomando faz tempo, sou tec de mecânica industrial e digo com total convicção que as máquinas estão ganhando muito espaço no mercado de trabalho
Verdade. Isso é bom e ruim
Is Robert Downey Jr. Yang Gang?
Patti Feliciano Should be.
He certainly should be
Patti Feliciano He needs to publicly support Yang for sure!
Everyone should be!!
Tony Stark for predisent!!!
This is Awesome and mind-blowing! 🤯😯
"Correlation doesn't imply causation!" Machine Learning: "I'm pretty sure the temperature in Topeka affects how many pepornia pizzas I need to make tomorrow."
Did anyone notice that Robert Downey. Jr said endgame even dead iron man's still in the endgame
Yeah I had noticed
Spoiler😂
Did you notice how he posed like the Egyptian pharaohs?!
timestamp
When cars came out, the whole horse based industry went away. The blacksmiths down to the guys that picked up horse crap off of the city streets. Never forget a before and after shot of New York City only a couple of years apart, one showing hundreds of horse drawn buggies and stuff , then the next with maybe two horses and hundreds of cars. The whole equestrian infrastructure decimated.
Bring back horses. Nothing good ever came out of cars.
@@АлександърВеличков-щ6ч your ignorance to how superior the modern automobile is to a mere animal is amusing
@@АлександърВеличков-щ6ч
cholera and stench is nice
@@BirdTurdMemes yeah but atleast they could see a non hazed sky line.
Correct. Now we are the horses. That's why I seek out unique skills that automation is not being marshalled towards. 🤠
I’ve been driving since 87. I own my own trucking company. What I want to know is what happens to those sensors and cameras during a snow storm? Freezing rain? Fog? Ice?
I think a bigger impact would be to split up traffic. Trucking only highways and roads. Distribution centers built close to metro areas. Dedicated truck facilities and parking in the truck only highway systems.
This episode is pretty one sided. I'd like to hear a more realistic view. The opposing argument.
Colorful Codes do you oppose?
Last year a fintech startup asked me to join them leaving my current job at bank as a A.I trainer to help the A.I make decisions. They never gave me any assurance for my job after A.I completely learns decision making. So I rejected the offer
Terminator three has a whole segment of the other side :-p
@@chidile7567 I'm in the middle. It will help with accessibility issues within society and keep me in demand but this video sounds too much like a feel good ad. I know there are serious consequences. Not everyone is in tech and these companies care mostly about profit. Not balanced at all. Makes me question the bigger goal of this series. No substance. 🤔🤔🤔
Lots of jobs will be lost. It will be very bad over the next few decades. But we'll adapt. Like we always do.
We just have to survive the transition.
While driving in the freeway...
Maureen: I'm going into manual mode.
Truck: Stop. You're being... noncompliant... Maureen.
*truck jerks wheel towards huge cliff 😕😐😑
At first I was really sceptical about A.I. but many videos like this one changed my mind to believe in it more and even though it will take away some jobs it will also make new jobs just like the video says.
One concerns still stucks with me; since A.I. can be smarter than a human it can do things that we aren't capable of comprehending. I also saw a video on a hypothetical scenario of an A.I. being smarter than a human and people have connected it to the Internet which was apparently a huge mistake and lead to the doom of the human kind. So my concern is that some people might not understand the powers of A.I. and misuse it. Other than that I think that A.I. Will help us in some way and make things easier and safer for everybody.
Every Robot, Software should also receive a salary. The money should be for the citizens.
10:18 "The Endgame" - RDJ
Too soon man, too soon.
Lol I heard it too
These episodes are very interesting and educational.
As for the automated ship yard, it is fairly impressive. The automation used in this manner is directly designed to reduce human workers. Yes, it is more efficient and safer. Unfortunately it does remove more human jobs than it employs new humans. This trend will continue for many years.
Human workers will need to step up their math and coding to compete.
Robot is the definition that human has no robot jobs anymore, forever.
I'd be interested to hear from those who were laid off by the companies mentioned.
You had no idea how bad it would get lol
Instead of self driving cant we employ AI in a way to reduce road accidents. They can practically help us drive more intelligently.
And self driving will do that it will practically help everyone drive better by eliminating the Human element. If you've played GTA 5 you'd have noticed that cars don't make any mistakes there. Well except when the code tells the cars to cause accidents on perpose.
10:17 Robert says "the endgame..." lmao
You gotta love the truck driver true dedication.
OMG think AI cranes loading to AI trucks, this video was well designed xD
I want to transfer my conciousness to a computer so badly
You have a phone maybe one day they could accumulate all your conversations search’s and everything else ever writ including app usage compile it together and create robotic You
You have already done it.
Because you are using Google products and they drive your consciousness.
Common sense does not exist. It is a learned set of rules and understandings imbued by culture and environment so much so that it becomes intuitive and often subconscious to the individual. Common sense for someone who grew up in a jungle will not be present for someone that has grown up in a large city and visa versa. 'Common sense' is learned and not an instinct. Using the phrase 'common sense' for AI and machine learning in this context is not entirely appropriate.
I think that the trouble here is that teaching machines to do things that we are not always aware of ourselves requires a level of personal mindfulness that is not present in many programmers or even a large body of the population. We take for granted much of the decisions we make in our daily life that we assume are instinctive, but we have in fact learned to make many decisions that were are not aware of. Articulating these things to a computer system becomes incredibly difficult because we must dive deep into our minds and dwell in places that we may not have known were there. Teaching a machine 'common sense' will require a personal deeper connection of one's psychological functions and a higher level of self awareness.
Do you program? This mindset with the skill is billion dollar worthy of you can program.
The very act of programming is creating rule sets around common sense.
The way the RUclips algorithm finds videos for you to watch shows that AI can understand you better than you know yourself.
Im assuming you are not a programmer. Every programmer knows this
If you're wondering, ZUME (27:23) has ditched its pizza making, and now focuses on making products for bigger companies, like face masks and food bowls.
what's happenning to Zume? But I like their idea of leveraging AI to predict resource and minimize food waste
99% of this documentary budget.... Robert Downey Jr's Pay 🙃
Hahah thats true :D
He is the producer, So it might be like - " Lets produce a documentary at 1 percent budget"
It feels like were getting closer to terminators and matrix
We been in the matrix s the government been lieying to us for years
More like some jetstones
"Detroit: Become Human" much?
May there be mercy on man and machine for their sins
Skynet already exists. It is a British satellite and AI military system. It is in the Eurofighter typhoon and BAE Taranis unmanned stealth bomber.
*Robot Title at Video*
Tony stark: *Ight imma head in.*
Haha
This is a great channel! I only caught sight of you folks in recent times, but it’s now among my favourite channels. I am loving it.
Me too after got into RUclips premium
Therefore Andrew Yang.
Yang Gang! 🇺🇸
Why does everyone keep mentioning his name ? Someone please explain
VPN hub
Não vai ser bom pra muitos, só poucos conseguirá ter um ótimo emprego por exemplo.aaaahh
I am loving this series!!!!! I hope you are going to keep it going. Intelligent and informative!
"They're all gonna drop LiDAR. Mark my words" ~ Elon Musk
LiDar without radar is stupid, lidar with radar is ideal. radar without lidar is okay
@@xRays6 "It sidesteps the fundamental problems of visual recognition that is necessary for autonomy. It gives a false sense of progress, and is ultimately a crutch." ~ Elon Musk
That's great competition held by the NASA to find out great talent & these guys did a really great job. Thanks for sharing RUclips and congratulations to the AI team.