The Secret Deal That Changed The Course Of India’s History
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 15 ноя 2024
- The Battle of Plassey in 1757, near Murshidabad, marked a turning point in Indian history. Nawab Siraj-ud-Daulah’s army of 50,000 faced the British East India Company’s 3,000 men, led by Robert Clive. Despite his overwhelming numbers, Siraj’s fate was sealed by betrayal and the weather. His general, Mir Jafar, conspired with the British, promising to withdraw at a critical moment. When a monsoon hit the battlefield, the rains ruined the Nawab’s gunpowder, leaving his forces defenceless. The British, with their dry gunpowder, unleashed devastating fire, crushing Siraj’s army in just 11 hours.
Crucial to this outcome were the Jagat Seths, Bengal’s wealthiest bankers. In league with Clive, they offered a fortune to overthrow Siraj. This financial backing secured the British victory, leading to their dominance over Bengal and ultimately, India.
Following his defeat, Siraj-ud-Daulah fled but was captured by Mir Jafar’s forces. Despite pleading for his life, he was brutally executed by a butcher, marking the end of his reign and the beginning of British control. The aftermath saw Murshidabad, once a thriving hub of wealth, begin its decline, with the British establishing Calcutta as their stronghold. Plassey’s battlefield, once soaked in blood and betrayal, stands as a reminder of how a single battle-and a rainstorm-changed the course of Indian history forever.
#IndiaMarvelsMysteries #IMMSeason2 #WilliamDalrymple
#BattleOfPlassey #JagatSeth #Murshidabad #BritishIndia #EastIndiaCompany #IndianHistory #SirajUdDaulah #RobertClive
This is a multi-audio video. You can choose English, Hindi, Tamil or Telugu audio by clicking ⚙️ (Settings) under video and selecting the Audio Track.
It's a known fact that without namakharami it's not possible for few ships to come and invade India back then..
Battle of tallikota . Biggest betrayal in Indian history
India the land of betrayars .
Scamgress party continues to betray Indians .
After reading your comment i searched and came to know about Gilani brothers betrayal. It gives immense pain to learn about this war. 😢😢
The greatest betrayal remains the one in Talikota war, it tried to teach the best lesson to Indians, which they never learned to this day!!!
Marwaris were onenof the main reasons for britishers to come and reside in India
What we fought for 1000 years with muslim invaders you all were just crying we fought against British
Over time, the British and Rajputana signed many treaties and agreements. The revolt of 1857 is often described as India's first war of Independence. Mangal Pandey, a 34th regiment soldier, revolted at Barrackpur cantonment. Rajasthan was one of the rebel states that actively participated.
This proves how ,jagat seths were true villians of our society from start of country 🙄🙄🙄🙄🫠🫠🫠
I doubt, how far in detail you know history. Sirajdaulla was not liked by many Hindu and Myslim nobles. So, many connived with Rabart Clive to remove him from throne of Bengal. However, D.LRoy made Sirajdaulla hero in his play Sirajdaulla in twentieth century.
Bus Rasgulla rah gaya.... Sab chale gaye.
It's a dialogue of local guide.
Read about the BATTLE OF TOLIKOTA amd fall of Vijayanagar Empire. Its a reminder of how we were betrayed by the snakes we fed daily. We have always failed to indentify the snakes hiding in the grass.
Aren't we doing the same mistake even today?
@@surajpatil7242 it will be a never ending story
Yes we were betrayed by our own people
@@SubhamBhattacharya-zp7ie own people ?
@@SubhamBhattacharya-zp7ie we were never had anything in common from the ancient times indian subcontinent is a mess can u name anything common across the Indian subcontinent
These traitors would have never thought that there names will become eternally etched into the minds of Indians with contempt and hatred for ever. Any mention of Mir Jafar or Jagat Seth make you convulse even today three centuries later.
jagat seth's house says otherwise
@bibekmisra3488 His descendents are not alive.
Mir Jafars descendants are alive in Bangladesh.
Nizam traitor (who betrayed even Mughals & first one to enter subsidiary alliance) went to seek refuge in Pakistan & then Turkey.
@@SimhaArya-zu7voWhich descendants of Mir Jafar are in Bangladrsh? There was a documentary that showed the descendants are living in West Bengal in sheer poverty.
@truthseeker3740 which nonsense documentary? Mir Jafar descendant fled to Bangladesh.
Course of indian history changed when mighty vijaynagar empire lost in battlefield............ otherwise it would be different story.........
Yah it is the fact ❤.
It would be.😂 😂
Yes
Yes
Vijaynagar never helped any of their neighbours that is why no one came for their rescue. They never managed to enter north
Islamic Rulers of Bengal were never liberal. They burned houses of Hindus, tortured them even took taxes for pilgrimage. Demolishing Mandirs was a small thing to them.
They were at least capable to stopping onslaught of British marauders. But for Mir Jafar, India would have been a different place today.
Islamic rulers may have done very bad things, but British broke the back of India for a long long time to come and made it sink into abject poverty for centuries.
Like Modi demolished mandir's in Varanasi? Is Modi secretly muslim?
@@light_reason3577 Like The Mughals & Afghans did before.
Like even after having a court order the Masjid is still in the planning stage in Ayodhya.
Right
Right
I never believe History TV . But this could be an exception as I see William D. in the video.
Forgotten Tomb. People hated the Nawab.
I can’t believe this at all.
People still visit Murshidqbad for him and to see his Grave.
My...village..❤😊😊...beside battle ground. 😊
Very good description of the battle of plassey👍. This proves that indians themselves were responsible for their 200 year slavery under britain 🇬🇧. Jagat narain himself invited the british to rule india 🇮🇳 and mir jaffer did treason by not fighting for the bengal kingdom army.
One common thing, that is not taken into account is that the British did not rule all of India for 200 years and that was restricted to Bengal and Madras Presidency. In the north Empires such as the Sikh Empire in Punjab did not fall until 1849, thus the British only ruled major areas of North India like Haryana, Punjab, Himachal Pradesh etc. for less than 97 years. The Marathas themselves were in power till 1818, thus even Maharashtra and Madhya Pradesh were subject to English rule for about 129 years.
Nawabs and that group were even worse trhan the British. They were also invaders and their descendants, not Indians.
You are telling the truth. In my opinion, Muslim rulers of India were worse than Britishers.
Most educated bjp hindu 🤫🤐
@@afzzalhossain9894 madrasa chaap
They were from IRAN. They never even spoke native language.
@@afzzalhossain9894 wht bjp in tht he is uttering facts wannabe
Very nice video 📹 👍 👌..1943 famine by Churchill 😪😪😪
What a nice documentary but just 50k views, sad😢
Changed the Course Of World's History..
In the hindsight that was fortunate for Hindus. Otherwise, India would have been like Middle East of today.
Now we are like africa instead
Traitor to your own country
@@secaccnt9931Africa is neighbors with both Europeans and Middle-Easterners.
@@muhammadafg1126 People with Pakistani mindset are the traitors.
How middle East? Maratha Empire were muslims? How does defeating of Marathas by British fortunate for hindus?
Marathas won multiple battles against Portugal.
Marathas won 1st Anglo Maratha War
Maratha won Seige of Bharatpur
Maratha won Battle of Deeg
Maratha won Battle of Farrukhabad
Maratha won Battle of Mukundara Pass.
Bengal, Nizam Hyderabad Sindh were Tributary states{that pays Chauth(Tax)}.
I made this comment because some Cl0wn commented, these Empires were only losing wars.
Heck even Mughal won war against British.
And Dutch lost to Kingdom of Travancore.
Most Marathas become decorated Princes & rajahs earning pensions ... from the British!
Only Tatya Tope & Lashmibai fought, because they were deprived of the pension!
Marathas, Sikhs, Gurkhas were supporters of EIC when Gadar happened which had the potential to wipe off the EIC from Indian Subcontinent !
(Similar events at the same time happened against Spanish colonial rule in South America and they were overthrown - Same with USA as well! )
But in India, lots of Kings and Nawabs supported the EIC !
Over smart Marathi empire was the main reason of British dominance in Indian subcontinent.
@srivsnow4990 The decorations were British bribery holders, Real Maratha fought at battleground. British released "successor" to create internal chaos, which led to Maratha Civil War.
mughal emperors in bengal lenient!!! what a joke?
never seen this part before in history, & as we know the traitors were from our own land!!
This happened everywhere in India. That's why brits called it divide and rule.
British divide and rule at play in the comments section.
The Marathas were the premier power of the country then. Always hard strapped for cash. Why make a dash to the north?They would have certainly known that Bengal was the richest province. Let Abdali Raid the north west. Why bother?They should have directed their attention to bengal. Got the money they needed from jagat seth omnichand and prospered,before making a mive to take the northwest. If you ,see the british did the same. They took notth west india last
Read Anglo maratha wars
Jaswantrao holkar fights against east india company generals untill his last breath
He also wants to attack bengal but he got heart attack
North west was the farthest corner of india 🇮🇳.
Marathas objective was never to loot and make money.
They wanted Hindavi Swarajya and Hindu Pad-Padshahi ie Native Hindu rulers ruling India.
It was the dream of Shivaji and was realized by Bajirao.
How can you even compare British and Marathas??
@@alphabetagamma4142 After Chhtrapati Shivaji Maharaj and Chhatrapati Shambaji Maharaj the idea of Swaraj was diluted. The Marathas did loot. This is well documented . The comparison between the two is bound to happen as they and the British were the only two contenders and only one could rule India .
@@ramkrishnan8476 Go read history my guy before making such outrageously wrong claims.
The concept of "Hindu-Pad-Padshahi" was coined by Bajirao Peshwa. That literally means establishment of a Hindu monarchy to rule India aka Swa-rajya.
This was long after Shivaji and Sambhaji Maharaj were gone.
He was the one who conquered the bulk of India.
Was there a bit of looting? Obviously there was. Thats how wars work. There won't be a SINGLE war in history where the victor didn't loot and pillage to at least some extent.
But *looting after a war* and *going to war for the very purpose of looting* are two very different things.
This is the end of the argument from my side. I clearly smell an agenda on your side and I'm not going to engage further. Cheers✌
Marathas were disgraced hardline hot-headed Hindus, and so were the SIkhs who only fought East India Company to face defeat! They were the by-product of heavy handed ruling by the Mughal. Mughals were invaders too (5th or 6th generations living in North Indian Subcontinent) but they became namesake "power" after Aurangzeb and all regional Rajas and Nizams became powerful who did not see it coming!
Bengal fell because Mir Zafar, Jagat Seth and 3-4 other top important people teamed up against Siraj-ud-Daula. All these conspirators never dreamed how bad they would be later treated by the East India Company.
Always in their mind was probably they were doing something good !
The funny things that this video missed is, Robert Clive made a fake document, with EIC fake signature, agreeing to all terms lid out by Mir Zafar & party. Obviously, after EIC win, it was not honored and finally Jagat Seth become poor and Mir Zafar committed suicide but EIC like a man-eater tiger got the taste of the blood and gobbled the entire country, indirectly. They only fought when they calculated they can win!
So, at the peak of the Maratha, Sikh, Nizam, Haider Ali power, they waited and until their power is vastly diminished.
Once they won, EIC and later British government systematically looted 43 Trillion dollars from the Indian subcontinent (sucked people, resources, industry out of the subcontinent and re-branded as "Made in Great Britain"). From 1/4 of the GDP of the entire world in 1700s, the Indian subcontinent's contribution was 0.2% in 1947. They took Indian soldiers to die in TWO world wars where they were killed in great numbers than all allied Europeans soldiers combined (by the consent of Gandhi, Nehru, Jinnah, via round table conference)!
Also they caused tens of famines as they took indirectly enormous taxes from the farmers, which made everyone homeless and beggars and dead! Then they re-purpose the slave ships of Atlantic Slave Trade, and replace the freed-up African slaves with indentured laborers (girmitiya) from India to Fiji, Guyana, Mauritius, Trinidad & Tobago, Jamaica, and other African colonies! Winners wrote the history but TRUTH is always there! So we know the "Great" Britain abolished human slavery! But tens of millions are all over the globe who have Indian ancestry ... like slaves !
British left strategically (citing the win of non-violence!) , taking no blame for millions of deaths in partition, diving us for infinite (religion based) conflicts, installing a friendly government which kept this loot going till 1980s!
Fake History, unproductive subjects, wrong conclusions about the looting British is still widespread among India people.
*
Only now, the TRUTH is out, piece-by-piece!
*
Summary British on paper made Indian subcontinent civilized, but in reality - killed, looted, maimed, raped, for 250 years ! As colonizers ... France is worse ...as it's still raping indirectly to it's former colonies in Africa (they have become free but still controlled via financial instruments).
*
India still suffers forever fighting PK & BD ... which were designed by British to inflict harm forever - till eternity ! OR ask question? At 1972 Indo-Pak war, when India won, why the East Pakistan did not dissolve back in India? Just like East and West Germany ????
*
Luv4rmNJ
*
Reunite for akhand bharat like our ancestors
Britishers started their conquests when already India was weakest after the fatigue of destroying Mughal tyrannical rule, An invader has the first mover advantage just as other Islamic invaders and has nothing to lose in terms of territory unless the invaded chases back the invader in his retreat which is rare, Britisher like Islamic invaders just needed 1 state to fall in case of Britishers they captured Bengal and capitalized on it to slowly gobble up rest. India was infested with Muslim fiefdoms , still Britishers lost many wars but as an invader one is bound to win unless the defender chases the invader down to his own homeland and decimates him there, invader
Really enjoyed reading such a brief albeit eloquent narration of the history of Bengal.
how come u wrote such a big but crisp comment
British east india company was a shell company of britain,
2, britis were not alone, they had support of US, french, portgese, dutch,
*Islamic rulers of Bengal were never liberal . they burned house's of Hindu , tortured them even texas for pilgrimage . demolishing mandir was a small thing to them*
Most educated bjp hindu 🤫🤐
@@afzzalhossain9894most educated muslim from madarsa university 😢😢
Yes Marwadis veg Hindus were the most patriotic Indians
Very very informative video
An immature leader who was handed over power too early. Inheriting the throne from his grandfather.. A feeling of entitlement and a failure to understand the dynamics of politics- that the support of a network of power centres is essential.Alienating these centres by demanding their women and wealth was a blunder. Public support was not considered a factor in that era of absolute power. And the shrewd and unscrupulous EIC exploited the situation.
"O Tempora, O Mores".
Great video. How accurate is it? I passes my stomach test... I will use this in my class in the USA to help explain how the British were able to conquer India os easily.
Is history TV a reliable source?
i spent 6 months travelling in India, so I do trust my gut.
Again thanks.
India never existed as a single national entity at that time. The British easily found local allies. When they attacked one kingdom, the neighboring ones either did nothing or helped the British. History TV18 has quite a lot of the History Channel like Pseudoscience about "ancient technologies" and so on. I would cross check the claims made there because they do have an anti-Muslim tilt.
Yes, bengal army's general mir jaffer is Indian version of benedict Arnold & quisling. He ganged up with Robert Clive to backstab his nawab to takeover as next nawab. Even today no muslim would keep mir jaffer's name to his children. Just google his name.
Jagat seth' s story is something majority of Indians except Bengalis are not much aware of. He was the filthy rich businessman who financed the east india company & Robert Clive with roughly million pounds each to fight the battle of Plassey for his personal vendetta on nawab siraj ud daula. The sole benefactors of this conspiracy, battle & betrayal are Robert Clive & British East India company.
Not true, the powder is a lie to cover up the corruption, money was paid for the betrayal, and then those people were betrayed as well
6:48 Muslims were never liberal towards residing hindus, many of the talks in the videos are fake full of liberal propo
This Jagat seth was one of the main reason for britishers to win,
That treachery saved millions of Hindus from genocidal Siraj
Saved none
Bengal was already defeated by Marathas & paying Taxes(Chauth)
@@SimhaArya-zu7vo lol... Here I'm not talking about Marathas Or Chauths. Get your context right.
And I am talking about
Foreign (English intervention) in Bengal is the reason, India was colonized.
@@SimhaArya-zu7vo Bengal is not the reason, because long before Plassey Jahangir let Britishers to settle in Surat and that was the reason of colonization. And anyway it's good to be with Britishers than to be under Muslim rule. India was colonized by Britishers, this is the reason why Ghazwa e Hind dream failed.
It's not good! I am not saying Muzlem were good.
British is the reason, one could not hold any arms, why temple is not free, why only Temples are taxed(even now), why all Sanskrit institutions were uprooted & history was forged.
England needs to give back 46 trillion plus interest to India.
And whatever they stole from all their other “colonies”
India was 23% of the world GDP before England. When England left, India was 3%. Left with starvation and transformed a population to become prone to diabetes due to the starvation fed state diets
What about wealth looted by Muslim Invaders such as Ghazni, Ghori, Khilji, Mughals, Nadir Shah? Much of these wealth was taken outside of today India.
Lack of unity among Indians had led to slavery of Britain 🇬🇧. This also resulted in partition in 1947. The current politicians are looting india 🇮🇳 more.
Nawab of Bwanipur, Hurree Jamsit Ram Singh, attended Greyfriars as 'Inky' and shared much tuck with Billy Bunter.
Marwari jagath seth the real anti national
😮 very nice video 😮
Jagat seth - Mehtab was real conspire of this
Neither the bengal nawabs saw them as natives nor the British. For Indians it was one colonial power over the other. British were less intrusive in Hindu practices and less barbaric that's why people chose them over islamist nawabs
It is very shameful how a private company could over throw the mughal empire.
betrayal started with the Qasim attack on Sindh.
I am not expecting such incorrect , half backed & false narrative by this platform.
Many of narration & map of Bengal at that time was absolutely wrong.
1. First starts with Map . The map shown by for Bengal era showing all parts of Odisha then. Wheras only a thin chunk north of Subarna Rekha river was with Bengal rest ruled by provincial kings or by Marathas until 1803 when it came under British.
2. Jagat Seth he himself heched the conspiracy is a half backed truth. When Grand Father of Sirajuddwaula started military campaign against then ruler Jagat Seth financed him with assurance to return money after victory & special privileges neither were given alash women of the family forcibly taken as Sex slave.
3. British (East India Company) was already in politics in south india & Robert Clive already strengthened it & came to Bengal to repeat it.
4. Sirajaudaula was much unpopular due to atrocities done with majority Hindus.
5.Robert Clive on his own & for company hatched conspiracy taking abord Mir Jafar for his will to be Nawab of Bengal & Jagat Seth for revange for his family.
4. Islamic Rulers never kind to any non believers any where in India or in whole world as per their religious text. They destried Hindu temples & converted them into Mosque.
Example Adina Masjid of Malda. One can easily mark Hindu gods & scripturs in it's walls.
5. Temple built by Queen of Notor was much late . It was during the British rule when it was a Jamindari or Principality under British.
These are few major false narrative or half backed truth presented by this platform. You can find more.
2. is wrong.
3. is correct
4. Is fake. He was unpopular among Bengal Zamindars, some of whom rebelled against him, and among merchants because he regulated the growing power of people like Jagat. There are no known public atrocities he committed.
4(6). Except bigots like Aurangzeb, others were kind. That is why their rule lasted 800 years, while British rule laster ~170 years (190 years for Bengal). Despite that, even Aurangzeb built few temples for political reasons.
5(7). True. The temple was built later.
In claiming to correct false information, you have tried to spread false information of your own, just like agents of the British Raj did in India.
@@curious_one1156 From your comments I assume that you are not a history guy.
You categorically denounced point number 2 & 4 .
Denying 2 means no past history of Jagat Seth family.
Denying 4 means denying Islamic rule over India & else. You accepted Aurangzeb with a comment he built temple which is a lai .
Why you forget Babur who demolished Ayodya.
Do you think Akbar was secular & Hindu lover. He himself massacred 40000 non combatants Hindus in Chitor. Such instances well found with Jahangir & Sahajahan but thank you post independence first 5-10 islamic education minister & left historian like Romila Thapper & Irfan Habib who categorically denounced Indian ruler & glorified Moguls .
So first read some authentic history from authentic sources.
Motor❌
Natore.☑️
MORAL OF THE STORY
NEVER TRUST YOUR FRIENDS RELATIVES BLINDLY.
ALWAYS BE CAREFUL.
SECOND BETRAYAL COME IN 1799 IN TIPU SULTAN CASE AND THIRD BETRAYAL CAME IN 1857-58 IN WAR OF INDEPENDENCE CASE 😢😢😢😢😢
Siraj uddin daulah was tyrant and was hated by Hindus and jains Mir Jafar is not traitor he is considered because he is shia Muslim who turned against Sunni siraj uddin daulah we Hindus were doomed between Britishers and Muslim rulers
Jafar and Siraj both were Shia Muslims lol.both persian descendants. Siraj was born in Murshidabad but Zafar was himself from Persia.
One side wolf vs lion 🦁 both will eat its subject
Still that day Mirzafore remembered as a symbol of traitor in Bangladesh. 😢
Haramzada jagat seth, I am proud hindu and I love Muslims like Siraj ud daula❤ he represent of real hindustani king but feel sad for her painfull nd inhuman death may lord shiva bless his soul..
Muslims never liberal
Thanks for the british for defeating the sultanate and freeing the millions of hindu bengali sIaves.
^you are a prime example of 'Slaves of British' - RSS since 1900 and till now
Yah❤
🤦Bengal was already defeated by the Marathas & paying Chauth
Pagoler moto kotha. Sobai jane Muslim ruler ra Mondir bhengeche kintu jebhabe British er paa chatcho tomra Tate mone hocche modi 2029 obdhio thakbe naa tar agei jabe❤
@@SimhaArya-zu7vo bengal wasn't ruled by marathas, it only became their tributary.
Marathas l00ted the regions they conquered in bengal and inflicted terrible harm on civilians. They never helped any Bengalis
S1aves remained as s1aves in bengal until the British victory was secured over the sultanates.
Don't distort history... These Muslim rulers were all cruel invaders who were very oppressive towards the Hindus in Bengal.
They were even worse than British, under British Hindus at least had limited freedom and weren't persecuted for their beliefs
Money lending marwadis brought British into Indian politics.
Yes they r one of the reason
The European architecture is so much more aesthetic than Indian architecture
The Palace of a thousand doors is stunning
Nawabs of Bengal were liberal wtf 😂😂😂😂😂😂 fking joke
And you're a historian?
Name one important journal or history research done by you.
Do you read your bible christi?😂?😂@@josephlohe5442
@@josephlohe5442no but i am from Murshidabad so i know the history and the truth is the nawabs were not liberal
@@josephlohe5442 mate we Bengalis know our history better than you outsiders. So don't try to teach us OK.
These Muslims rulers were all invaders who were very cruel and oppressive towards the native Hindus in Bengal. It's a fact.
@@josephlohe5442 people of murshidabad will tell u the truth and that Plassey battlefield located in our Nadia district and murshidabad our neighbouring district. So stfu 😂😂😂😂
It be our own people
Koi lutere dayawan nahi hote.....
Why didnt the British gunpowder get wet?
Because it was covered & waterproofed. Siraj was yesterday's Saddam Hussain! A lot of people in his kingdom hated and conspired against him.
Bad, young, ill-tempered, extremely horny king !
But the fate of MirZafar, and Jagat Seth was much worse, post EIC victory !
6.48 nawab never r lieral against hindus, dont spread fake news.
😂😂😂😂 pata bhe hai oska ak commander hindu tha
@@abdullahali5040kitne saare indians...british ki madad bhi kr rhe the....lavish life jeene ke liye...jese wo actual on ground indians ko depict nhi krte wese 2-3 talve chatne wale gaddar bhi hinduo ko represent nhi krte
@@abdullahali5040aur un gaddaro ke hatho hi..mandiro ko bhi tudwaya jata tha
Don’t talk if you don’t know, little knowledge is dangerous
Siraj ud daula's grandfather was a good ruler and liberal. Siraj was the psycho
British had 8000 troops not 3000
Whan p gye hi the to saaf safayi kr dete jara
Sikh supported the british in 1857 and later during the Indian freedom movement, RSS supported the British.
RSS never supported British
RSS was about to be ban by British for large Gatherings
RS never supported British
They were about to be banned for largest gathering
RS did not😂🤦
Britain throught it as a danger to its Sovereignty
@@SimhaArya-zu7vo yes they did. Please do a little bit of study before making any comment 🙏
Just read about RSS on Wikipedia.
They did not
Wikipedia is not any source😂
Islamic rural always against Hindu hi kam kiya he... History ko manipulation karke change kra Diya
They have still not stopped spreading biased narratives and propaganda. British didn't colonize free india, they colonized the Mughal rules India which had been enslaved for centuries. Marathas put up a good fight but by then British had become all too powerfull
Brit got there way eventually 😢
Do Jgatsaith was the first traitor. Who invited east india company
One marwadi mistake … divide india in 1947…
Birtsh ke ek baat jis be desh par raaj keya os ke main ledar ko es tara badnam keya jo blame os par en se j pata karo tum karne keya gaye se hum ko os ne offer deya j hum ne tab keya winner ho kar apne hisab se kuch be lekh do
Hr bap ka ek bap hota hai
Chindus betrayed Sirajuddaula
Mir Jafar*
😂😂 So Hindus shd not blame puslims for betrayals !! & Hindus shd trust puslims who survive only on betrayal 😅
Chal madarshachap Mir Jafar ne kiya waise nhi bhadiya hua bahot mara kata tha hinduo ko
Jo mugal british ke khilaf kabhi jeet nhi paye gyan choood rhe hai
1 anglo maratha war kon jita , battle of deeg kon jita , bsttle of farrkhukabad , battle of bharatpur kon jita ek bhi jote british ke khilaf
All lies.
I want to say though, without British there would never be an unified India. Except some mythological creations like Aryan tribe Bharata, there was hardly any king who was able to unite India completely, there was Chandragupta Maurya but that was in some BCE, and even he couldnt have Tamil and Kerala as it exists today under him
Dont get me wrong, India as a concept existed before British with boundaries but this was a civilisational state, not a nation state as it exists today. The british gave us an unified language of empowerement, and a democracy. We should be thankful to them for that. Else India would have been forever under Islamist rulers with no concept of democracy.
Look at success of India today since 1992, its all because of English language, most of the people who are passionate about their own language make peace with English. So English is the unification language across India
Your first paragraph is largely correct. But the next two aren’t quite.
The biggest power the British faced was not Islamist rulers but the Marathas. After the 3rd Anglo-Maratha war of 1818 is when the British came to rule majority of Indian territory.
About language, English is convenient but not a prerequisite for development. Else countries like Japan would have never developed. The reason for development of India is the post-1991 economic reform.. English has been the co-official language of India since the constitution of 1950 so that’s not the reason.
Except the mauryan part i agree with most of what you've said
At the time of mauryas, kerala was only inhabited by forest tribes until the brahmins and their acquinted communities came to the place, with the myth of parasuraman
Cholas were allied with maurya and mauryans influenced and resulted in the formation of tamil language.
@@garyishmarathas never had any impact in indian subcontinent, they just go and l00t the places they conquered and impose heavy taxes on the subjects.
They were highly inefficient to safeguard their power and to fight a conventional war, it shows their failures in panipat, mysore and with the mughals before british conquests.
Hindus in india can assert the claim that the marathas ruled india defeating mughals, thats the only thing they have to show their ownership of india
@@EA_customersupportAfter Aurangzeb, Mughals became too powerless to contain the the whole of mughal empire. Maratha became very powerful and had influence from Cuttack to Atak including Delhi. In short, British won 'majority' of the subcontinent from Maratha and Shikh not Mughal.
@@garyish Marathas were disgrced hardline Hindus, and so were the SIkhs! They were the by-product of heavy handed ruling by the Mughal. Mughals were invaders too!
Bengal fell because Mir Zafar, Jagat Seth and 3-4 other top important people teamed up against Siraj-ud-Daula. All these conspirators never dreamed how bad they would be later treated by the East India Company.
Always in their mind was probably they were doing something good !
The funny things that this video missed is, Robert Clive made a fake document, with EIC fake signature, agreeing to all terms lid out by Mir Zafar & party. Obviously, after EIC win, it was not honored and finally Jagat Seth become poor and Mir Zafar committed suicide but EIC like a man-eater tiger got the taste of the blood and gobbled the entire country, indirectly. They only fought when they calculated they can win!
So, at the peak of the Maratha, Sikh, Nizam, Haider Ali power, they waited and until their power is vastly diminished.
Once they won, they and later British government systematically looted 43 Trillion dollars from the Indian subcontinent. They took Indian soldiers to die in TWO world wars where they were killed in great numbers thn Europeans combined (by the consent of Gandhi, Nehru, Jinnah, etc.)!
Also they caused tens of famines as they took indirectly enormous taxes from the farmers, which made everyone homeless and beggars and dead! Then they re-purpose the slave ships of Atlantic Slave Trade, and replace the freed-up African slaves with indentured laborers (girmitiya) from India to Fiji, Guyana, Mauritius, Trinidad & Tobago, Jamaica, and other African colonies! Winners wrote the history but TRUTH is always there! So we know the "Great" Britain abolished human slavery! But tens of millions are all over the globe who have Indian ancestry ... like slaves !
British left strategically (citing the win of non-violence!) , taking no blame for millions of deaths in partition, diving us for infinite (religion based) conflicts, installing a friendly government which kept this loot going till 1980s!
Fake History, unproductive subjects, wrong conclusions about the looting British is still widespread among India people.
*
Only now, the TRUTH is out, piece-by-piece!
*
Luv4rmNJ
*
Jaffar as BEngAl and SAdiq as DECcan NAng DEEN NAng QAum Please remember this great couplet from poet of EAst.IQBAL. Muslims all over the world 🌍 be careful from snakes with in.
Why are they not talking about coward king gwalior
Nawab siraj ud daulah ser.
tha agar usko dhoka nhi milta to angrej o ko dikha deta bangali kya chees hai
Yes thats why Bengali/Mughals lost 17 times to Ahom Empire. Without politics Assam would have never been defeated. We are born warriors.
@@krish5445tell me the name of that 17 battles
hindus are always betrayer.
During mughal: yes saar
During nawab: yes saar
During british: yes saar
After getting their own country: we are scared saar😂,
Civilised people and Society are always afraid of Terrorists.
@jabinnahid9034
Illiterate
Who blinded Shah Alam ll?
Ghulam Qadir
Who attacked Mughals in 1757? Rohilla. Who saved them? Maratha, & put Shah Alam as ruler.
British Jail were filled with inhumane Muzlem prison guards, who tortured our freedom fighers.
Bangladeshi, same Cl0wns that gave shelter to Mir Jafar (whose Descendants live there)
@@jabinnahid9034 who fought battle of patparganj to defend mughal emperor Shah Alam sani in 1804 , yaswant rao holkar,
But later shah slam sani himself sided with Britishers, marathas went to Delhi in 1757, to defend mughals from Afghans, but 1 Year later the played double game on on hand inviting Abdali and on other hand asking help from marathas, and later changing sides with Afghans.
Madarsa se padha hai kya
😂😂😂
They United us in one NATION.
Nabab is good siraj daula but mirjafar betrayed bengal and nabab india future change this wer.palasi war.we bengal know all ground insident what happened.