LOL, I'm already getting this in ID.4 I just assume responsibility if something goes wrong but in such conditions on such speed it's unlikely to crash.
The ID.4 only has level 2 autonomous driving. It is not the same thing since you are supposed to still be watching the road with the ID.4. Most brands offer level 2. Mercedes is the only consumer vehicle that I am aware of that offers level 3 driving in the US.
@@privettoli i heard in a talk that the EQS has more redundancy (example: steering motor is separated to the servo motor and some other parts) that is required next to the certification process to get L3. software wise not much difference but hardware wise there are differences.
This guy saying that ping-ponging is solved by map data nearly made me spit out my coffee. Ouch. FSD/Autopilot works completely offline and doesn't ping-pong in the slightest. If you need maps for your self-driving to work, you are going to fail.
So how far away is the car in front of you? It feels like it's driving rather slowly versus the cars around it. Granted this may not be a bad thing but doesn't seem like the most appealing experience.
Crazy how many "free" Tesla defending trolls are everywhere. Maybe they still wait for Roadster-2 as a gift for their efforts? Elon, where is the free cheese... car for influencers? And MB top manager was right when he said that Semi truck was impossible with the tech Tesla had. It's why it is not mass-produced yet - Tesla needed years of tech improvement. BUT the main point is: Level 5 is years from now. Even Level 4 could be problematic to get authorization for - and driver's control is still needed, anyway. So Level 3 is the safe bet now. Total Tesla domination, using Robotaxi service with Level 5 FSD FAILED. When - and if Tesla will get to reliable Level 5, other leading brands will get to Level 4. And then Tesla will wait several years to get driverless model approved.
So you one of those who tries to compare Mercedes joke system which ONLY works on highways with 50'ish limitations to a system which is being developed to work on any road?... Seriously?... Mercedes shills are sad... If you want to have reasonable comparison then do it with Tesla free autopilot or atleast with Tesla enhanced autopilot which are made to work on highways. Which one performs better?
@@Zripas Autopilot term is a marketing trick from Tesla. You need to control everything, anytime. Tesla or MB or other car. So... no Robotaxi in many years to come. The rest is just little bit more comfort at most.
@@user-nu1vn3yy9s Its cool that you completely ignored everything I said and went to talk about different topic here... I would have more trust in Tesla autopilot than I would in this joke system which only works in extremely specific conditions, which only means that it's really easy to scare it of. Its a joke system, a thing made to give Mercedes free advertisement and to have that claim that hey did it first... Nothing more.
This is laughable.😂 It is absolutely useless. No faster than 40 mph, must have a vehicle in front to follow, road conditions must be dry and clear, lane marking limited, route must be pre-mapped- geofencing and daytime only. (Hopefully MB paid you to recite their marketing script) 9:25
So, to summarize, Mercedes' Drive Pilot works only when the road conditions are perfect and you're moving at the pace of a turtle. Mercedes should be embarrassed.
Meanwhile Tesla is heading towards a dead end with their vision only approach while Musk makes false promises year after year after year ... Mercedes just delivers.
You can still use level 2 in all conditions just like tesla. On top of that you get level 3 where you no longer need to pay attention to the road and if an accident happens mercedes is at fault, not you as the driver.
key difference is that it Mercedes takes full responsibility in a case of a crash, Tesla not. This is actually certified Level 3 not the Level 2++++++ Tesla is shipping.
@@tzarcoal1018 Key difference is Tesla could care less about level 3. They will jump from 2 to 5 with an over the air update once regulators approve it.
No it's not, you can watch movies, email on your laptop, whatever you want...LEGALLY. With tesla you have to be watching the road, have hands on the wheel, and no videos will play on the display due to legalities.
LOL, I'm already getting this in ID.4 I just assume responsibility if something goes wrong but in such conditions on such speed it's unlikely to crash.
The ID.4 only has level 2 autonomous driving. It is not the same thing since you are supposed to still be watching the road with the ID.4. Most brands offer level 2. Mercedes is the only consumer vehicle that I am aware of that offers level 3 driving in the US.
@@ngiovas my point is that the difference is in legal perspective, the car still drives the same way.
@@privettoli i heard in a talk that the EQS has more redundancy (example: steering motor is separated to the servo motor and some other parts) that is required next to the certification process to get L3. software wise not much difference but hardware wise there are differences.
This guy saying that ping-ponging is solved by map data nearly made me spit out my coffee. Ouch. FSD/Autopilot works completely offline and doesn't ping-pong in the slightest. If you need maps for your self-driving to work, you are going to fail.
What!? No it doesn't! You're talking about Tesla's adas? It wonders all over. I've had it attempt to wander to the right, under a semi trailer twice.
Tesla autopilot is trash and inefficient and keeps killing people
@@xrotaryguy Your hopeless attempt to recover your TSLA short position is hilarious to me
So how far away is the car in front of you? It feels like it's driving rather slowly versus the cars around it. Granted this may not be a bad thing but doesn't seem like the most appealing experience.
At only 40 mph and only in traffic wth and not at night ok smh
Awesome. I need this!
Crazy how many "free" Tesla defending trolls are everywhere.
Maybe they still wait for Roadster-2 as a gift for their efforts? Elon, where is the free cheese... car for influencers?
And MB top manager was right when he said that Semi truck was impossible with the tech Tesla had. It's why it is not mass-produced yet - Tesla needed years of tech improvement.
BUT the main point is: Level 5 is years from now. Even Level 4 could be problematic to get authorization for - and driver's control is still needed, anyway.
So Level 3 is the safe bet now.
Total Tesla domination, using Robotaxi service with Level 5 FSD FAILED.
When - and if Tesla will get to reliable Level 5, other leading brands will get to Level 4.
And then Tesla will wait several years to get driverless model approved.
So you one of those who tries to compare Mercedes joke system which ONLY works on highways with 50'ish limitations to a system which is being developed to work on any road?... Seriously?... Mercedes shills are sad...
If you want to have reasonable comparison then do it with Tesla free autopilot or atleast with Tesla enhanced autopilot which are made to work on highways. Which one performs better?
@@Zripas Autopilot term is a marketing trick from Tesla. You need to control everything, anytime. Tesla or MB or other car.
So... no Robotaxi in many years to come. The rest is just little bit more comfort at most.
@@user-nu1vn3yy9s
Its cool that you completely ignored everything I said and went to talk about different topic here...
I would have more trust in Tesla autopilot than I would in this joke system which only works in extremely specific conditions, which only means that it's really easy to scare it of. Its a joke system, a thing made to give Mercedes free advertisement and to have that claim that hey did it first... Nothing more.
@@ZripasRead my initial long comment where I explain why Tesla missed the Big Goal of Robotaxi, and why FDS level matters less more than you think.
This is laughable.😂 It is absolutely useless. No faster than 40 mph, must have a vehicle in front to follow, road conditions must be dry and clear, lane marking limited, route must be pre-mapped- geofencing and daytime only. (Hopefully MB paid you to recite their marketing script) 9:25
So, to summarize, Mercedes' Drive Pilot works only when the road conditions are perfect and you're moving at the pace of a turtle. Mercedes should be embarrassed.
Meanwhile Tesla is heading towards a dead end with their vision only approach while Musk makes false promises year after year after year ... Mercedes just delivers.
Exactly what you said only opposite. 🤣🤷🏻♂️🤦♂️@@valueinvestor8555
You can still use level 2 in all conditions just like tesla. On top of that you get level 3 where you no longer need to pay attention to the road and if an accident happens mercedes is at fault, not you as the driver.
No, it just reverts back to level 2 self driving if you go over 40mph. Same as Tesla at that point.
….So to summarize.-It’s Tesla Autopilot that’s included with purchase. 🤷🏻♂️🤦♂️
key difference is that it Mercedes takes full responsibility in a case of a crash, Tesla not. This is actually certified Level 3 not the Level 2++++++ Tesla is shipping.
@@tzarcoal1018
Key difference is Tesla could care less about level 3. They will jump from 2 to 5 with an over the air update once regulators approve it.
@@rgeniec yeah once that happens...which could be in a few months, in a couple years or never.
No it's not, you can watch movies, email on your laptop, whatever you want...LEGALLY. With tesla you have to be watching the road, have hands on the wheel, and no videos will play on the display due to legalities.
Nice, MB has always led the way. The rest will follow…
That’s hilarious. 🤣🤣🤦♂️