What's truly amazing is the lady at the front desk there on the telephone never faltered, she stayed talking to whomever it was the whole time. 🦁 🐯 🐯 oh my.😊
@@GemCity937you lied about the entire situation. I guarantee you wouldn’t be creeping around my personal vehicle without me saying something and you would walk away with your tail between your legs. Cowards like you and your woman beater buddy only pray on people that can’t or just won’t fight back.
@@GemCity937nah, they all are the same parasitic dregs of society that you are. They don’t “like freedom” they like watching a fellow incel harass women. Parasites and incels tend to flock together.
@@donhale6939you mean mocking, laughing at, reporting and working to remove the channel? Is that support? Seems like you incels live in an alternate reality.
No filming rules on ANY government building property are no different than any other rule on such property, such as no eating, no pets, must wear shirts and shoes, operating hours and so on. Our rights of expression (speech, photography and press) under the 1A do not change that. Our rights are subject to restrictions, which is the basis for time place and manner court rulings. If the purpose of the government property is not for expression under the 1A, the legal standard for whether a government rule violates the constitution will be based on location. That is, if you are filming from a sidewalk, a place where expression traditionally takes place, the filming restriction will be analyzed must more harshly than if the no filming policy is on government building property. There is no established right of expression (speech, photography and press) on any government building other than the steps of the Supreme Court. Auditors don't know this or ignore it. The government employees also don't know this. While you may disagree with the above, and I don't know why you would, disparaging, harassing and doxxing innocent government clerks and the like is abhorrent. Even if the auditors are right, WHICH THEY ARE NOT, the social media disparagement of innocent people is sickening.
@@therewillbe5682 There are cases on photography and filming, one very recent (Price v. Garland) that mentions that filming is not expression under the 1A, and yes, the 1A does not mention it.
Their just too ignorant to realize that, these clowns DON'T respect ANYONE, but themselves, but they want everyone else to respect them, yeah ok, that MIGHT happen...
@@therewillbe5682 The 1st amendment doesn't even mention the internet or phones. The 3rd Amendment doesn't even mention apartment or condos. The 5th Amendment doesn't even mention air or space forces.
Im sorry but most of us het past throwing temper tantrums when we past puberty. Perhaps you should ho to the department of hurt feelings to file your complaint. Wow talk aboutvtwo guys showing their true age. Did you both forget to grow up ? Do you wanna foia my informstion too?
You need to go to the emergency room quickly because your rabies symptoms are manifesting...rabid mean!!! Jokes on you Jethro - you can't foia ANYTHING from her phone UNLESS she did it at the behest of her Supervisor. Go pound sand.
I've heard of people being offended at being filmed in public, but being offended for your car now? come on. we couldn't even put the person with the car until she came out and announced it was her car.
@@IHFM2024 no. over not answering to the community they pretend to serve, which is part of their obligation to the public. Even a janitor could serve the public better. I'm grown, and thanks for the suggestion. 👎
So then you can apply? and get a real job, not a fake journalist on YT job? Take their job and make change from inside the organisation, oh no that does not pay as well as YT
@@jimbragdon1126 there is no such law. Their phones are their personal property and are treated as such. The morons demanding a FOIA request for personal property is ludicrous. She has every right.
@@bubbavonmax4211 There are countless FIOA'd examples of recordings from personal phones being turned over. It is clearly considered public records by a vast swath of gov't entities in the land.
What's truly amazing is the lady at the front desk there on the telephone never faltered, she stayed talking to whomever it was the whole time. 🦁 🐯 🐯 oh my.😊
Creepy.
I bet that office smells like Kaopectate.🤣🤣🤡
They do it to themselves.
maybe it's like, Whitehall is the town, and Columbus, OH is the city or something.
i would fight anyone that dares look at my car. its a matted of honor.
🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂DONT THINK FRAUDITING IS YOUR FORTE, U GET YOUR FEELINGS HURT TOO EASILY🤦♂️🤦♂️🤦♂️🤦♂️🤦♂️🤦♂️
call the feeling police🤣🤣
You need to challenge the individual, he's the problem, unemployable, rude, obnoxious, wastes taxpayers money, interferes with working people.
What a waste of time
Did she say Cindy or Denise
she said stacy and was lying
@@GemCity937 I heard Denise, try that name in the City Hall records
@@GemCity937you lied about the entire situation. I guarantee you wouldn’t be creeping around my personal vehicle without me saying something and you would walk away with your tail between your legs. Cowards like you and your woman beater buddy only pray on people that can’t or just won’t fight back.
anytime Chris just let me when
I'll never understand why you people want to be hated.
Nothing to do but harass office workers. If the phone is privately owned good luck. Can't believe 10,000 subscribe to this person.
LMAO Yes and they all love freedom
And yet here you are, watching and commenting. Thanks for the support.
@@GemCity937nah, they all are the same parasitic dregs of society that you are. They don’t “like freedom” they like watching a fellow incel harass women. Parasites and incels tend to flock together.
@@donhale6939you mean mocking, laughing at, reporting and working to remove the channel? Is that support? Seems like you incels live in an alternate reality.
4:36 that's right we want you to make a mistake, because we love accountability.
Harassing women again. What a shock.
Oh Look! the health check truck just rolled in. So many gimmicks so little time.
Funny how these cowards only harrass women. SHEETS VS CITY OF PUNTA is the case that does not give you the right to film in city hall.
his friend with the 70s perm, hendry is also a convicted wifebeater, explains why they both creep on women
When employes reolize that that building is there FOR THE PEOPLE they can do their jobs and not their FEELINGS. I Am ashamed to call them AMERICANS
You’re not American though. You’re either commenting from another country or a parasite leeching off of real Americans.
Ha frauditor next time Try cutting the Prozac in half.
No filming rules on ANY government building property are no different than any other rule on such property, such as no eating, no pets, must wear shirts and shoes, operating hours and so on. Our rights of expression (speech, photography and press) under the 1A do not change that. Our rights are subject to restrictions, which is the basis for time place and manner court rulings. If the purpose of the government property is not for expression under the 1A, the legal standard for whether a government rule violates the constitution will be based on location. That is, if you are filming from a sidewalk, a place where expression traditionally takes place, the filming restriction will be analyzed must more harshly than if the no filming policy is on government building property. There is no established right of expression (speech, photography and press) on any government building other than the steps of the Supreme Court. Auditors don't know this or ignore it. The government employees also don't know this. While you may disagree with the above, and I don't know why you would, disparaging, harassing and doxxing innocent government clerks and the like is abhorrent. Even if the auditors are right, WHICH THEY ARE NOT, the social media disparagement of innocent people is sickening.
The 1st amendment doesn't even Mention photography, much less permit it.
@@therewillbe5682 There are cases on photography and filming, one very recent (Price v. Garland) that mentions that filming is not expression under the 1A, and yes, the 1A does not mention it.
Their just too ignorant to realize that, these clowns DON'T respect ANYONE, but themselves, but they want everyone else to respect them, yeah ok, that MIGHT happen...
You have all the qualifications and permits for your rights. Take your leash and don't forget to lick the boots.
@@therewillbe5682 The 1st amendment doesn't even mention the internet or phones. The 3rd Amendment doesn't even mention apartment or condos. The 5th Amendment doesn't even mention air or space forces.
Reported this footage top right gear symbol violation of Community Guidelines for bullying, harassment, hateful abusive content.
Cindy Stewart
Im sorry but most of us het past throwing temper tantrums when we past puberty. Perhaps you should ho to the department of hurt feelings to file your complaint.
Wow talk aboutvtwo guys showing their true age. Did you both forget to grow up ?
Do you wanna foia my informstion too?
You need to go to the emergency room quickly because your rabies symptoms are manifesting...rabid mean!!! Jokes on you Jethro - you can't foia ANYTHING from her phone UNLESS she did it at the behest of her Supervisor. Go pound sand.
Interesting standard
Were they this snotty BEFORE they were hired as servants? Or do they only become snots after they start grabbing those salary checks?
they’re not your servant, you don’t own them
@@ayrton.petersen we pay for them....
@@drednm my taxes pay your welfare does that mean I own you?
@@drednm you seriously need mental help. You own nobody. Slavery ended a long time ago. Do you remember the 13A?
@@drednmso what, they're still not your servants.
Come up to marysville. They have one of the police parking restricted from a road but not from the public parking lot
Is that her personal/work phone she is recording you on?
If lt is he can request FOIA on her phone
if the frauditor can record her, she can record him back lens licker. it doesn’t matter that he got his feelings hurt
@@ayrton.petersen thank you for watching
@@lla1733 get some mental help
@@anthonytrevon865 wrong
Get her fired immediately
for what?
God you people are utter trash..
she wont be fired, she treated these pieces of shit appropriately
Stop taking my taxes for your welfare.
@@ayrton.petersenfor being unprofessional
I've heard of people being offended at being filmed in public, but being offended for your car now? come on. we couldn't even put the person with the car until she came out and announced it was her car.
I would complain about the folks who wouldn't give up the name as well.
Don’t forget to get the manager too Karen! Then you could call the feelings police and have a good cry.
@@christucker139 it's their duty to answer to the community.
@@invalidrequestover a name grow up.
@@IHFM2024 no. over not answering to the community they pretend to serve, which is part of their obligation to the public. Even a janitor could serve the public better. I'm grown, and thanks for the suggestion. 👎
@@invalidrequest is that a law?
File on all of them by job site if they will not ID!
So then you can apply? and get a real job, not a fake journalist on YT job? Take their job and make change from inside the organisation, oh no that does not pay as well as YT
Did you finish 8th grade?
Hey can you provide a link to the law that states that a public official's personal phone gallery is public record? I can't seem to find it
I think on duty officials do things when they are on duty that’s public record, I am pretty sure.
@@mdnanumiah1768 I'd just like a link to a law on the books.
@@jimbragdon1126 there is no such law. Their phones are their personal property and are treated as such. The morons demanding a FOIA request for personal property is ludicrous. She has every right.
@@bubbavonmax4211 I know ;)
I just like seeing them sweat. lol
@@bubbavonmax4211 There are countless FIOA'd examples of recordings from personal phones being turned over. It is clearly considered public records by a vast swath of gov't entities in the land.
Also, you're NO ONE to be insulting people. You can't be filming personal vehicles either.