Well we may have been slightly better off economically, but there’s no doubt that Trump divided Americans and turned us against each other. Him and Biden are essentially to blame for how fragile our society and culture is right now. It’s our responsibility to prevent them from getting back into office.
We were better off under Obama too.... Do you give Obama credit for the good economy under his terms? And what about the fact that the economy started turning while Trump was still in office?
How does a Libertarian debate in support of Govt encouraging the ending of life? Even more odd, to see a Libertarian argue for central state governance. How is Federalism not the more supported position than Centralized Governance from a Libertarian's perspective? Is it, not more Libertarian for the States to decide their own fate on this issue than it is for a mandate from the Federal Govt that all peoples, regardless of belief or principle, must oblige to the Federal govt's singular opinion, no matter which side of the debate they are in? Is it not the Libertarian principle, a bedrock principle even, that no matter the policy, the decision-making is better the closer it is to the individual? Then on the subject of age limits...how does a Libertarian argue for the people to have less capability to express who they wish to represent them with his supported authoritarian regulation on some arbitrary age being a cap and regardless of capability, if you're over that cap you can not be selected to represent your community, even if the community would have voted for you regardless of your age? Then when this Libertarian moved to Foreign Policy, he became a liberal with a small 'l' and showed that while on one side of his mouth, he bashed the other candidates for their deficit spending and adding to the debt, but then out of the other side of his mouth he talked about defending another society in a war they started and then through some unknown authority he would command, end that war so he could spend US money on rebuilding Gaza, a region of a foreign country....when did Libertarians change and decide that foreign countries are a valid expenditure of US tax money? When did they change and decide that the US should dictate winners and losers? When did they change and decide that how foreign countries defeat their enemies is a problem for the US to get involved with? I see a whole lot of Authoritarianism in this guy's presentation and very little Libertarian. He seems in this interview at least, to be a liberal who doesn't wish to join the Democratic Party. I can understand that position, but I fail to see how that makes him a Libertarian, forgoing all the principles of Libertarianism. The debate for abortion is a matter of when life begins, for whenever that does happen, it has rights that most Libertarian concepts and principles say must be protected from the abuses of the State. I think after the fall of the Roe-v Wade cannon, the States became the arbiters of authority in this determination and what we are seeing unfolding across the US is States concluding when that moment legally occurs. You can debate different conclusions than what is being ruled, but you have to support the fact it is in the hands of the different States rather than the Federal Govt, at least until we can all come to an agreement on when life begins at a super-majority level. The other aspect of Libertarianism is that whenever it is deemed to be life, it has rights, it isn't a 2nd class citizen to be at the whims of its mother any more than an abused child is at the whims of its parent. I haven't listened to a lot of his views, so he could just be horrible at understanding the position, and so subject to amend his positions stated here. But my first impression is that he isn't a Libertarian, instead he is a leftist who doesn't wish to be associated with the Democratic Party. He surely doesn't seem to grasp the ideological position of Libertarianism and the fact he is the Libertarian Party's candidate, suggests there are a lot of people in the party who also fail at understanding the bedrock principles of Libertarianism and what it means to be a classic Liberal with a BIG L, instead they are much like the other parts of the Left, liberals with a small 'l' being more akin to neocons than to Libertarians. There is nothing Liberal about using authoritarian measures to solve a problem. There is nothing Liberal about promoting tribalism and division.
@@DeliveringSolutions would be but for two exceptions. 1) Freedom until it does harm to another. The baby is determined to be a life means it must be protected from harm by someone else's choices. 2) the rule/regulation on when life begins must be at the closest point to the individual as governance allows. Ending Roe pushed it back to the States, where it should be decided, at least when in the binary perspective between State and Federal.
Libertarians are divided on the pro-choice vs. pro-life issue, which is understandable because two different lives are at stake. Folks can always choose to NOT have an abortion. Those who are pro-life can work to educate and help women make choices that align with pro-life ethics rather than using the state to do that. Isn’t it better to choose not to have an abortion than to allow the government to force you to give birth?
I’ve been a registered libertarian for 34 years. I’ve grown frustrated with the two party conspiracy to keep any additional parties from being able to practically compete. How do we develop a system like that of England? That said, Donald Trump is an amazing public speaker, a good man, a fellow NJ asshole, and I will vote for him again this year.
We need to reform the electoral system and institute ranked choice voting for congress. Then all the other "third parties" could get a legitimate foothold, establish a track record, and put up viable candidates for the election. Fortunately in this election cycle the democrats and republicans are rolling out geriatric patients and people will naturally start considering an option that has a better chance of still being alive in four years. That's how long the term for the presidency is.
The answer is not a system like England's which also uses a first-past-the-post, winner takes all electoral system. The only reall difference is that their head of state is elected by the winning party, not voters. The real solution is Ranked Choice Voting whih allows you to rank your favorite candiate first but back that up with lower rankings for other candidates incase you don't think your first choice can win.
How come Chase has never been mention. My son just told me about him. I like Biden. Can’t stand Trump. Chase would have been nice to have been seen and heard!!!
The corporate, mainstream media is in bed with establishment politics, so they are afraid to cover someone who won't support the corrupt system they depend on. It's up to us and alternative media to spread the word about him. #Oliver2024
I mean, if all the candidates were horses he'd be a clear choice. I'd bet you'd even have to pay more for him, considering the 2 choices that the media shoves down our throats might not be alive in four years
That's because he, and the ideas of liberty, are a threat to the corrupt establishment power, so corporate media knows they have to hide him. (The fact they didn't try to hide Trump in 2016 was a red flag to me that Trump wasn't an outsider, but was actually a well trained reality show actor willing do help the networks get lots of eyes on them.) #Oliver2024
Well that was pretty irresponsible for him to say that about illegal migrants, how about countering him with the parents about the death of their children.
Why does no one care about other presidential nominees? The party system has our elders so extremely confused they don't even think any other people could be elected. Its time to show them that we can take the system back from them and put the money back where it rightfully belongs. Hard workers deserve the biggest cut and everyone else can pick up the scraps.
As a libertarian for decades i can say the libertarian party is out of touch, not even representing traditional libertarian views. I'm changing to independent #Trump2024 #FJB
I remember Voting for Badnarik. I stopped supporting the party in 2020. A libertarian promoting lock downerism...and now a libertarian promoting child mutilation. It's a disgrace.
@@lizard450 That is simply NOT true. The duopoly must be gettikng really scared if they find it necessary to spread lies about his positions. He opposed lockdowns but said that business owners should be able to make their own decisions including whether their employees should be vaccinated if they thought that was best for their business. What he said about all transgender therapy is that it was a decision that should be made by parents and their medical advisors, not the government.
@@junegenishmm my comment reply to you isn't here let's try again. The 2020 Libertarian candidate supported lockdowns. Chase supporting gender affirming care is a flagrant violation of NAP. It's such a violation that he cannot be considered a libertarian. Children cannot consent. Parents cannot consent for the child. A doctor telling the parents it's ok ... Is not ok. Genital mutilation of a child for any reason religious or otherwise is not accepted by libertarians.
With all do respect, a vote for a libertarian is a vote for democratics. A libertarian vote takes a vote away from a man (President Trump) that can bring our country back together! As much as I would like to see a libertarian candidate running maybe run next term 2028.
With all due respect, a vote for a libertarian is a vote for libertarian. A vote for a democrat is a vote for a democrat. Those two are distinctly different things in a logical sense, in a mathematical sense of counting the votes, in every way. You know as well as I do that third party candidates are going to be getting more support this cycle. Who knows, one of them might make a serious run and we can finally get some election reform
If you’re a Republican, shouldn’t you be rooting for a Libertarian candidate? The Democratic Party is absolutely scrambling right now, so Democrats are much more likely to abandon ship and vote Libertarian than Republicans are…
I support Chase but the most important thing this year is NOT to vote for the duopoly. Most states will have mulitple candidates available on your ballot. Find an alternative you actually like and vote for that person. It's currently the only way we have to tell the duopoly that we are not happy with what either of them is offering us. We need to award Electoral College votes by Ranked Choice Voting to give alternative party candidates a fighting chance.
In regards to Chase Oliver's comment that he would work 7 days per week if he were president and not have as much down-time as Trump and others who seem to always be playing golf. When you get older you realized that you people of all ages benefit from downtime and good sleep to help you settle your thoughts and as a result solve your problems. Also life is short. Lastly, "All work and no play make Jack a dull boy".
I just watched the first half of the debate for the first time. Up until then I had only seen coverage and some short scenes on the new. I would suggest people rewatch it, including journalists. On watching it I'm not sure that it suggests there is a medical problem or cover up. A person can have a hoarse voice and not be at the top of their game. Trump was doing what he does, lying and sending personal attacks and Biden probably engaged with some of that he should not have. I think many of the people supporting Biden were hoping so bad that he did better and put Trump in his place and so the debate appeared worse than it was. I can imagine many younger people have worse debates. I suppose my main point is that when I actually WATCHED the debate and not the coverage it gave a whole lot more context and at least to me did not appear as troubling as was made out.
Yeah very true. The longer I watched it, the less I noticed Biden’s speech issues. But few people actually watched more than 10 minutes of it, so that’s not helping his negative reception. And to be fair, it was pretty noticeable.
Is he a REAL Libertarian, or like most today - 100% social libertarian, and 100% communist on the fiscal issues, government regulation, taxation, overreach and eroding personal liberties, etc etc etc?
This is a Lie. He doesn't believe in government control in a small business. He believes corporations should be held to more accountability & to stop financially graping middle class american. He wants to lower our taxes He also believes in a free market which is a very republican view. He doesn't believe the government has the right to overreach in our guns, bodies, business, taxes, freedom of speech, ECT ECT.
I will not vote you Sir, not because you young, but you lied as well. You said Trump lied as always, this is wrong. You said what were lied about abortion, aboard ..,these all your opinion. I knew those Trump talking points all correct. You said you can work 24 hours a day, that is a lie yourself.
With all due respect, Trump did indeed lie several times. Just to name a couple: he lied about calling Nancy Pelosi and requesting to send 10,000 members of the National Guard to the Capitol (there’s no evidence in support of this) and he lied about the frequency of late-term abortions (they really are rare, I’m not joking, look up a couple reports). He and Biden both also chose to ignore the question on the affordability of child care, which in my opinion is very disgraceful considering that children should always be the #1 concern of any country. I would advise against choosing to vote for either of them just yet honestly.
You really think people aren't taking a little peek at the third party candidates in this election? The dems and republicans are rolling out ancient artifacts and being jackasses talking to people like we're all stupid. At least this guy isn't at an age where he could just die of old age in the next four years, let alone handle a stressful job with people's lives in their hands 24/7
For the love of money people are selling themselves short of God's love. You can't love money and God. What is it if you gain the whole world and lose your soul. Jesus Christ the way the truth and life eternal.
![Eminem - Temporary (feat. Skylar Grey) [Official Music Video]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/ZaK9Wi5ho0o/mqdefault.jpg)
Chase has my vote!
Wow! Chase has a cat. A black one no less. He just scored extra points with me.😁
Double wow.! Two cats and they obviously have the run of the house.😁😁
I’m already on the Chase Train but I’m also a professional cat sitter and now I’m like 😻LOL
Sharp, lucid, educated, savvy... how different from the doddering Kleptocracy geezers!
All Americans lived Trump's truths, we were definitely better off.
This country is too fragile to screw this up.
Well we may have been slightly better off economically, but there’s no doubt that Trump divided Americans and turned us against each other. Him and Biden are essentially to blame for how fragile our society and culture is right now. It’s our responsibility to prevent them from getting back into office.
We were better off under Obama too.... Do you give Obama credit for the good economy under his terms?
And what about the fact that the economy started turning while Trump was still in office?
@@dustinabc Inflation and employment and tax breaks stayed the same.......
@@dustinabc Also you ever hear about the great recession?
Libertarian? Yup got my vote.
Our deep state coupe won't have him either.
Lol Biden brought up his golfing skills 😂
How does a Libertarian debate in support of Govt encouraging the ending of life? Even more odd, to see a Libertarian argue for central state governance. How is Federalism not the more supported position than Centralized Governance from a Libertarian's perspective? Is it, not more Libertarian for the States to decide their own fate on this issue than it is for a mandate from the Federal Govt that all peoples, regardless of belief or principle, must oblige to the Federal govt's singular opinion, no matter which side of the debate they are in? Is it not the Libertarian principle, a bedrock principle even, that no matter the policy, the decision-making is better the closer it is to the individual?
Then on the subject of age limits...how does a Libertarian argue for the people to have less capability to express who they wish to represent them with his supported authoritarian regulation on some arbitrary age being a cap and regardless of capability, if you're over that cap you can not be selected to represent your community, even if the community would have voted for you regardless of your age?
Then when this Libertarian moved to Foreign Policy, he became a liberal with a small 'l' and showed that while on one side of his mouth, he bashed the other candidates for their deficit spending and adding to the debt, but then out of the other side of his mouth he talked about defending another society in a war they started and then through some unknown authority he would command, end that war so he could spend US money on rebuilding Gaza, a region of a foreign country....when did Libertarians change and decide that foreign countries are a valid expenditure of US tax money? When did they change and decide that the US should dictate winners and losers? When did they change and decide that how foreign countries defeat their enemies is a problem for the US to get involved with?
I see a whole lot of Authoritarianism in this guy's presentation and very little Libertarian. He seems in this interview at least, to be a liberal who doesn't wish to join the Democratic Party. I can understand that position, but I fail to see how that makes him a Libertarian, forgoing all the principles of Libertarianism. The debate for abortion is a matter of when life begins, for whenever that does happen, it has rights that most Libertarian concepts and principles say must be protected from the abuses of the State. I think after the fall of the Roe-v Wade cannon, the States became the arbiters of authority in this determination and what we are seeing unfolding across the US is States concluding when that moment legally occurs. You can debate different conclusions than what is being ruled, but you have to support the fact it is in the hands of the different States rather than the Federal Govt, at least until we can all come to an agreement on when life begins at a super-majority level. The other aspect of Libertarianism is that whenever it is deemed to be life, it has rights, it isn't a 2nd class citizen to be at the whims of its mother any more than an abused child is at the whims of its parent.
I haven't listened to a lot of his views, so he could just be horrible at understanding the position, and so subject to amend his positions stated here. But my first impression is that he isn't a Libertarian, instead he is a leftist who doesn't wish to be associated with the Democratic Party. He surely doesn't seem to grasp the ideological position of Libertarianism and the fact he is the Libertarian Party's candidate, suggests there are a lot of people in the party who also fail at understanding the bedrock principles of Libertarianism and what it means to be a classic Liberal with a BIG L, instead they are much like the other parts of the Left, liberals with a small 'l' being more akin to neocons than to Libertarians. There is nothing Liberal about using authoritarian measures to solve a problem. There is nothing Liberal about promoting tribalism and division.
My body, my choice.
No government or anyone else should decide what I put into or take out of my body.
That sounds libertarian to me.
@@DeliveringSolutions would be but for two exceptions.
1) Freedom until it does harm to another. The baby is determined to be a life means it must be protected from harm by someone else's choices.
2) the rule/regulation on when life begins must be at the closest point to the individual as governance allows. Ending Roe pushed it back to the States, where it should be decided, at least when in the binary perspective between State and Federal.
Libertarians are divided on the pro-choice vs. pro-life issue, which is understandable because two different lives are at stake. Folks can always choose to NOT have an abortion. Those who are pro-life can work to educate and help women make choices that align with pro-life ethics rather than using the state to do that. Isn’t it better to choose not to have an abortion than to allow the government to force you to give birth?
Chase has my vote.
Definitely voting for this guy
I've never heard of this guy, guess I'll have to do some research 😊
Waste of time and vote!
Better than the other too 1000 year old option.
@@CharlesLee-es8jr Absolute lie that has kept us trapped in this two party hellscape!
Waste of vote
@@AlexRichardson98 absolute lie, the one that’s kept us in this two party hellscape for so long. Time for a change
The cognitive decline didn’t start this last debate as people want to pretend!
I’ve been a registered libertarian for 34 years. I’ve grown frustrated with the two party conspiracy to keep any additional parties from being able to practically compete. How do we develop a system like that of England? That said, Donald Trump is an amazing public speaker, a good man, a fellow NJ asshole, and I will vote for him again this year.
they can compete. Its just none of them have been on the levels of Teddy Roosevelt that could actually beat them.
We need to reform the electoral system and institute ranked choice voting for congress. Then all the other "third parties" could get a legitimate foothold, establish a track record, and put up viable candidates for the election. Fortunately in this election cycle the democrats and republicans are rolling out geriatric patients and people will naturally start considering an option that has a better chance of still being alive in four years. That's how long the term for the presidency is.
The answer is not a system like England's which also uses a first-past-the-post, winner takes all electoral system. The only reall difference is that their head of state is elected by the winning party, not voters. The real solution is Ranked Choice Voting whih allows you to rank your favorite candiate first but back that up with lower rankings for other candidates incase you don't think your first choice can win.
How come Chase has never been mention. My son just told me about him. I like Biden. Can’t stand Trump. Chase would have been nice to have been seen and heard!!!
The corporate, mainstream media is in bed with establishment politics, so they are afraid to cover someone who won't support the corrupt system they depend on.
It's up to us and alternative media to spread the word about him. #Oliver2024
Because the duopoly doesn't want you to have another choice so they silence viable third parties.
He's still here; there is still time. Don't act like it's already over
What about jb lies? Integrity is huge and I'm not sensing much from this candidate
I mean, if all the candidates were horses he'd be a clear choice. I'd bet you'd even have to pay more for him, considering the 2 choices that the media shoves down our throats might not be alive in four years
10:50 the PHILOSOPHY OF LIBERTY is what the country and the Libertarian Party were both founded on. #Oliver2024
Never heard of Chase Oliver
That's why it's important to share. He's the only chance to get our freedoms back out of this two party nightmare.
Blame the media and our two party duopoly. That's what we need Ranked Choice Voting which Chase fully supports.
Because he’s a liberal and his views are awful and nobody cares
That's because he, and the ideas of liberty, are a threat to the corrupt establishment power, so corporate media knows they have to hide him.
(The fact they didn't try to hide Trump in 2016 was a red flag to me that Trump wasn't an outsider, but was actually a well trained reality show actor willing do help the networks get lots of eyes on them.)
#Oliver2024
Great interview & cats, go Chase! 💛💛
Well that was pretty irresponsible for him to say that about illegal migrants, how about countering him with the parents about the death of their children.
votin for the cat
I hope to see you on the trail. I am going to leave the Democratic Party behind.
Excited to vote for Chase!
Dude, ur 38 years of age going against 3 fossils, immediately has my vote, I don't want a dinosaur running this country
Why does no one care about other presidential nominees? The party system has our elders so extremely confused they don't even think any other people could be elected. Its time to show them that we can take the system back from them and put the money back where it rightfully belongs. Hard workers deserve the biggest cut and everyone else can pick up the scraps.
As a libertarian for decades i can say the libertarian party is out of touch, not even representing traditional libertarian views. I'm changing to independent
#Trump2024 #FJB
You’re wrong you used this to promote the fool Trump
I remember Voting for Badnarik. I stopped supporting the party in 2020. A libertarian promoting lock downerism...and now a libertarian promoting child mutilation.
It's a disgrace.
100%
@@lizard450 That is simply NOT true. The duopoly must be gettikng really scared if they find it necessary to spread lies about his positions. He opposed lockdowns but said that business owners should be able to make their own decisions including whether their employees should be vaccinated if they thought that was best for their business. What he said about all transgender therapy is that it was a decision that should be made by parents and their medical advisors, not the government.
@@junegenishmm my comment reply to you isn't here let's try again.
The 2020 Libertarian candidate supported lockdowns.
Chase supporting gender affirming care is a flagrant violation of NAP. It's such a violation that he cannot be considered a libertarian.
Children cannot consent. Parents cannot consent for the child. A doctor telling the parents it's ok ... Is not ok.
Genital mutilation of a child for any reason religious or otherwise is not accepted by libertarians.
With all do respect, a vote for a libertarian is a vote for democratics. A libertarian vote takes a vote away from a man (President Trump) that can bring our country back together! As much as I would like to see a libertarian candidate running maybe run next term 2028.
Get a new catchphrase
It's funny, because the Democrats say it'll be a vote for Republicans.
😂😂😂 can't even pick a narrative, folks.
With all due respect, a vote for a libertarian is a vote for libertarian. A vote for a democrat is a vote for a democrat. Those two are distinctly different things in a logical sense, in a mathematical sense of counting the votes, in every way. You know as well as I do that third party candidates are going to be getting more support this cycle. Who knows, one of them might make a serious run and we can finally get some election reform
If you’re a Republican, shouldn’t you be rooting for a Libertarian candidate? The Democratic Party is absolutely scrambling right now, so Democrats are much more likely to abandon ship and vote Libertarian than Republicans are…
I support Chase but the most important thing this year is NOT to vote for the duopoly. Most states will have mulitple candidates available on your ballot. Find an alternative you actually like and vote for that person. It's currently the only way we have to tell the duopoly that we are not happy with what either of them is offering us. We need to award Electoral College votes by Ranked Choice Voting to give alternative party candidates a fighting chance.
It worked in Argentina it will be painful but it works
In regards to Chase Oliver's comment that he would work 7 days per week if he were president and not have as much down-time as Trump and others who seem to always be playing golf.
When you get older you realized that you people of all ages benefit from downtime and good sleep to help you settle your thoughts and as a result solve your problems. Also life is short. Lastly, "All work and no play make Jack a dull boy".
I just watched the first half of the debate for the first time. Up until then I had only seen coverage and some short scenes on the new. I would suggest people rewatch it, including journalists. On watching it I'm not sure that it suggests there is a medical problem or cover up. A person can have a hoarse voice and not be at the top of their game. Trump was doing what he does, lying and sending personal attacks and Biden probably engaged with some of that he should not have. I think many of the people supporting Biden were hoping so bad that he did better and put Trump in his place and so the debate appeared worse than it was. I can imagine many younger people have worse debates. I suppose my main point is that when I actually WATCHED the debate and not the coverage it gave a whole lot more context and at least to me did not appear as troubling as was made out.
Tell me more, please tell me more
Yeah very true. The longer I watched it, the less I noticed Biden’s speech issues. But few people actually watched more than 10 minutes of it, so that’s not helping his negative reception. And to be fair, it was pretty noticeable.
I tuned in late and only caught the very end. That was enough to convince me that neither of them is fit to be Presient.
No way jose! No bueno. I like him less and less the more he speaks
Is he wearing a pajamas suit
Is he a REAL Libertarian, or like most today - 100% social libertarian, and 100% communist on the fiscal issues, government regulation, taxation, overreach and eroding personal liberties, etc etc etc?
You nailed it.
He is an example of gaining the whole world and losing a soul.
For the love of money people fall short of God's mercy.
@@graffedin7083thx! Likewise!
This is a Lie.
He doesn't believe in government control in a small business.
He believes corporations should be held to more accountability & to stop financially graping middle class american.
He wants to lower our taxes
He also believes in a free market which is a very republican view.
He doesn't believe the government has the right to overreach in our guns, bodies, business, taxes, freedom of speech, ECT ECT.
Previous replies make no sense. Yes he is 100% libertarian and I should knw because I've been one for 50 years now
No he’s not, abolish the fed, taxes are theft, he’s not talking about any major libertarian views.
Who?!
🙏 🇺🇸 🙏
Trust me, Chase, I'm not "turning toward you."
I will not vote you Sir, not because you young, but you lied as well. You said Trump lied as always, this is wrong. You said what were lied about abortion, aboard ..,these all your opinion. I knew those Trump talking points all correct. You said you can work 24 hours a day, that is a lie yourself.
With all due respect, Trump did indeed lie several times. Just to name a couple: he lied about calling Nancy Pelosi and requesting to send 10,000 members of the National Guard to the Capitol (there’s no evidence in support of this) and he lied about the frequency of late-term abortions (they really are rare, I’m not joking, look up a couple reports). He and Biden both also chose to ignore the question on the affordability of child care, which in my opinion is very disgraceful considering that children should always be the #1 concern of any country. I would advise against choosing to vote for either of them just yet honestly.
South America is poor because the looter parties export shoot-first prohibitionism there. Remember Hoovervilles?
@@libertariantranslator1929 it's poor because of socialism
@@NickMilky Remember Hoovervilles? Was Herbert Hoover socialist?
This guy is not the option
Chase's orange cat is a better candidate than D&J
Forbes breaking news:
Don't no for Donald J Trump Vote Maga 2024!!
Who Cares?
You really think people aren't taking a little peek at the third party candidates in this election? The dems and republicans are rolling out ancient artifacts and being jackasses talking to people like we're all stupid. At least this guy isn't at an age where he could just die of old age in the next four years, let alone handle a stressful job with people's lives in their hands 24/7
This guy is about as libertarian as I am a ballerina
For the love of money people are selling themselves short of God's love.
You can't love money and God.
What is it if you gain the whole world and lose your soul.
Jesus Christ the way the truth and life eternal.
Religion needs to be out of our country politics. God has no recoil on current living situations. Please keep your jesus to yourself
This guy is no better than the DNC
This guy is a joke.
"Be happy with your 3%"
Ha, just what T-rump said when he got booed off the stage XD
Chase Oliver 2024
@gduag64 yep. Booed by a perpetually non viable party who nominated a shitlib as their candidate. Good job?
Trump is a developer and a real estate salesman. They tend to exaggerate but that do actually lie.
MAGA MAGA MAGA
Absolutely disgusting
I won't watch your video, I'm only here to ask for a Spell Check job.
5 or 6 hours sleep…Trump is like, hey kid, you sleeping in? 😂
Looks like he's high on some sought of drug!
Should've nominated Dave Smith.
Chase has my vote.