Why were Soviet submarines so huge. \\

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 27 сен 2024
  • The film tells about the Soviet submarine Project 941 Akula, NATO classification Typhoon and R-39 ballistic missiles.
    Author's text. Used for illustration:
    File:Typhoon class Schema.svg Author Mike1979 Russia commons.wikime... This file is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported license.
    Materials of the National Archives of the United States. Soviet newsreels. Excerpts from the films Battle on the Ocean, TPV-Generalniy-constructor. Public domain photo. Purpose of use: to show the actions of aircraft and ships. Replaceability: no.
    Music: Jungle - Aakash Gandhi. Mist - Odonis Odonis. Russian Dance - Joey Pecoraro.
  • Авто/МотоАвто/Мото

Комментарии • 19

  • @pcmacd
    @pcmacd Месяц назад +3

    I think the Rooskies were lots smarter than we give them credit for.
    As a mechanical engineer, everthing I saw in this video regarding the submarine design, given the limits of their solid rocket missile design, makes lots of sense.
    These ships were BEASTS.
    I just want to know, how quiet were they? After all, that is what really matters?

    • @Horsepower-717
      @Horsepower-717  Месяц назад +2

      Soviet submarines only became relatively quiet in the mid-1980s, after the KGB got their hands on precision machine tools to make propellers in the West. Before that, they were the "Roaring Cows" of the ocean. You probably know the story, there's a lot written about it on the internet. If not, I plan to make a video about it in the future. For the Typhoon, the noise factor was also important, although her tactics were to stay under the ice in the Arctic, not patrol the American coast. Thanks for the comment.

  • @zeus-mt7wx
    @zeus-mt7wx 3 месяца назад +3

    Well at least they admit to the technology side.

  • @Marcus-p5i5s
    @Marcus-p5i5s 3 месяца назад +8

    Lower tech level meant having to go larger to get needed functions into the hull.

    • @Normanx964
      @Normanx964 3 месяца назад

      Indeed. And this strategy did work to a large degree. They packed their ships with tons of missiles to compensate.

    • @Marcus-p5i5s
      @Marcus-p5i5s 3 месяца назад

      @@Normanx964 But crucially they were still too noisy and thus would never get to fire those missiles

    • @MisterKatz
      @MisterKatz Месяц назад +2

      It's not only with uboats. Planes too

    • @Marcus-p5i5s
      @Marcus-p5i5s Месяц назад +2

      @@MisterKatz Good point. Look at the Mig 25

  • @zeus-mt7wx
    @zeus-mt7wx 3 месяца назад +2

    Well at least they admit to the technology side.
    Interesting that the Russia theories changed. Before it was produce a good relabel weapon that was easy to make and maintain, like AK RPG and T72.
    They fell for the make a few high technology instead of mass production of nuclear subs.

  • @gerry4b
    @gerry4b 3 месяца назад +2

    Very interesting to hear voiced the very real Russian obsession with “gigantism.” A thought process that even today plays no small roll in the Putinist quest to recover former territories.

  • @mjuneoginn
    @mjuneoginn 3 месяца назад

    It’s not only the original R-39 Rif/NATO Codename STURGEON SLBMs that are in mind when conceiving such a gargantuan nuclear powered boomer submarine, nor how many Nuke MIRV Warheads each missile can carry and deliver;
    in my opinion as a civilian fascinated with Soviet War Machinery as seen & depicted on media like The Hunt for Red October and the Command & Conquer RED ALERT 2 & 3 PC Game Series:
    The Soviet Nuke Boomer Sub Project 941 Akula/ NATO Codename TYPHOON- was built that way with the primary purpose of being a heavy hitter boomer in one salvo, and serve as a mobile submersible (naval & operative) command center- in the event that a Nuclear Apocalypse has fallen upon what remains of the Soviet Union & Planet Earth on the surface, until such time that the Earth Surface is nuke radiation safe- enough for the remaining crew of the Typhoon to rebuild the “glorious” USSR in whatever landmass their Typhoon Boomer Sub would surface and dock onto…

  • @gerry4b
    @gerry4b 3 месяца назад +6

    It should also be mentioned that Russian surface vessels continue to provide the absolute worst living conditions for their sailors. With many finding it impossible even to shower on board during deployment.

  • @tfa8
    @tfa8 3 месяца назад +2

    typical Russia: our rockets are so big and inferior we need to build a huge submarine to house them. What are we going to say? Let's make up a story about the crew compartments and a gym room.

  • @Normanx964
    @Normanx964 3 месяца назад

    If the songbirds die you know you have a problem. Extra crew amenities were propaganda. Go big or go home. It was a clever idea that worked, but at great cost.

    • @USARAY1947
      @USARAY1947 Месяц назад

      Canary in a coal mine.

  • @garysnewjob
    @garysnewjob Месяц назад

    "Quantity has a quality of its own” is attributed to Joseph Stalin. This seems to be the Russian mindset.

  • @RS-so9us
    @RS-so9us 3 месяца назад +3

    The ugliest submarine ever built.

    • @berendharmsen
      @berendharmsen 3 месяца назад

      I disagree. For me, it's the only modern (post WWII) submarine that actually looks cool, with the conning tower to the back the boat has a very elegant line. Most other submarines look like, well, just another a boat that goes under water. This one looks like something out of a sci fi movie.

  • @roystonpereira2887
    @roystonpereira2887 3 месяца назад +1

    Russia ❤️