Russian ship stuck off UK coast has explosive power greater than Beirut blast

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 24 ноя 2024

Комментарии • 2,6 тыс.

  • @727skydivers
    @727skydivers Месяц назад +754

    The ship sailed from Murmansk, Russia. Damaged soon after, and still not turned back to Murmansk... Instead, they want to port in different NATO harbors... Right! Not supiscious at all. "Nothing to see here, move along, move along"

    • @robertstorey7476
      @robertstorey7476 Месяц назад +74

      If you were up to no good, clowning around appearing incompetent would be a very good way of disguising what you were really doing.

    • @smiffdamista
      @smiffdamista Месяц назад +5

      Do we know her name

    • @Bragosso
      @Bragosso Месяц назад +28

      It didn't sail from Murmansk, it sailed from Kandalaksha. It could have stopped in Murmansk as it was passing by, but it didn't.

    • @wklyspn
      @wklyspn Месяц назад +9

      They kinda sorta did something similar in one of the original modern warfare games 😂

    • @JohnDoe-il7dp
      @JohnDoe-il7dp Месяц назад +5

      But nothing happened, you im becile😅😅

  • @COLLSWORK
    @COLLSWORK Месяц назад +169

    We're Ruled By Fools and Fooled By Rules

    • @Ickie71
      @Ickie71 Месяц назад +2

      speak for yourself

    • @7366-HSGG
      @7366-HSGG Месяц назад +1

      @@Ickie71 lol, i was about type that !! :)

    • @alan.richard
      @alan.richard Месяц назад +1

      From the UK obvs?
      Although - that could apply to much of Europe.

    • @89Bullzeye
      @89Bullzeye Месяц назад +2

      @@alan.richardI think he’s on about the whole world

    • @lesigh1749
      @lesigh1749 Месяц назад

      The ship is no threat, there is no scary story here. You are being reported to by fools.

  • @jameshanna820
    @jameshanna820 Месяц назад +297

    If you know what's on the ship and how. Why did you let the ship come so close to the UK If you knew it was dangerous

    • @larryhurley2979
      @larryhurley2979 Месяц назад +8

      They were going to sink it but.lol

    • @edward6438
      @edward6438 Месяц назад +5

      Fertiliser

    • @ralphm6901
      @ralphm6901 Месяц назад +24

      As long as it's in international waters, it has a right to be there. Same as US warships going into the South China Sea. China claims that as their territorial waters, but everyone else treats it as international waters and sail through there anyway.

    • @everready59
      @everready59 Месяц назад +12

      ​@@charlieleedham5265stop the horseshit. If you know you know.

    • @martinwebster5881
      @martinwebster5881 Месяц назад +10

      @@ralphm6901
      It isn’t in international waters it’s in British waters. Just off the coast of Kent not too far from much of our energy infrastructure.

  • @keithswaddling2370
    @keithswaddling2370 Месяц назад +90

    Ok I have just checked on my ship finder app, and this ship is still off the South East coast North East of Margate level with the Thames Estuary, at anchor. I do not blame any port not wanting it there, but, what we need to be extremely worried about is this ship's location. If it were to explode, and there is no evidence that it would as yet, it would be on a scale which we have never seen before, I would think it would cause a huge aftershock and tidal wave. Worryingly, further up the Thames Estuary we have the sunken wreck of the US flagged SS Richard Montgomery which just happens to have 1,400 tons of very unstable ordnance rotting in its hold. If this were to explode on its own it would throw a 300 metre column of water 3000 metres into the air, and cause a wave some 5 metres high,
    It was considered too unstable to risk removing the ordnance, which has been there since August 1944, adjacent to this ship we have the oil and gas plants in Sheerness. I do not need to tell you how this unstable wreck could possibly explode if battered by a huge wave travelling up the Thames, triggered by an explosion on the MV Ruby.
    Forgive me for not trusting anything the Russians, are involved in, but we are hardly on Putins Christmas list, and maybe this is just part of his plan to attack the UK, and blame it on an unfortunate accident. This ship needs to be towed back to Russia, and left for them to deal with, there also needs to be restrictions as to what ships can carry through the English channel, especially close to our nuclear power station at Dungeness, which is also reasonably close to this ship.

    • @lynettestrachan8000
      @lynettestrachan8000 Месяц назад +15

      Excellent post. Your absolutely spot on. I wld think along the same lines as u. And I wld not hesitate to ensure it was sent back to Russia. But who wld do that and how safe wld it b for the crew?
      I'm worried for ur people and infrastructure. Putin is NOT to be trusted.

    • @brianphaneuf6875
      @brianphaneuf6875 Месяц назад +9

      Look up the 1917 Halifax explosion as a reference...appalling but not a World ender.

    • @merledietrich9168
      @merledietrich9168 Месяц назад

      What was this ship doing in the English anyway . In my opinion ,Putin is psychopathic and capable of doing most anything . Isn't he known for creating unfortunate accidents as one of his ways to attack his opponents?

    • @janice2992
      @janice2992 Месяц назад

      Thank you so much for your detailed report. It's not UK's responsibility to return the Ship although it could be pulled into the middle of nowhere and blown up. Hamas was seen visiting Putin a few times. Putin stole Ukraine's grain and delivered it to Turkey. At the same time China stocked up on grain. Putin said he would take the Gazan people. If you tube have reported correctly. There is a petition for UK to take the Gazan children. I believe this is an intmidation tactic to continue restrictions on weapons license's to Israel. We officially support Israel but restrict their weapons!??? We need to petition against restrictions of weapons to Israel and give them as much support as possible. We are on the verge of WW3 anyway. Our enemies have been planning for it because they all hate Western democracy.

    • @earlgrey691
      @earlgrey691 Месяц назад +1

      Any where near the sunken USS Montgomery near the Thames estuary that would devastate London if it was 'disturbed' ?

  • @sameebah
    @sameebah Месяц назад +46

    The guy speaking at the start needs to revisit his relationship between tons and kilotons.
    The ship would *NOT* explode with the force of twenty thousand kilotons (20 megatons).
    Did nobody at the channel have the gumption to spot this?

    • @Dhydronyc
      @Dhydronyc Месяц назад +1

      The threat is clear. Simply a message.
      Even if toothless, you do not want to be bitten by a toothless tiger.

    • @martynm.449
      @martynm.449 Месяц назад +2

      Maths is maths

    • @lynnekirk4820
      @lynnekirk4820 Месяц назад +1

      Non event please guys get a reporter who knows what this situation is 😅😅

  • @bobeyes3284
    @bobeyes3284 Месяц назад +199

    The cargo has no buyer. Never had. It left Russia with no where to go. Nothing at all suspicious about it.

  • @gdutfulkbhh7537
    @gdutfulkbhh7537 Месяц назад +681

    Ask the Ukranians to help: they're VERY good at making russian ships go 'away'.

    • @crimsongrease6382
      @crimsongrease6382 Месяц назад +46

      @@gdutfulkbhh7537 damn spat my coffee everywhere on reading..

    • @MKR5210
      @MKR5210 Месяц назад +21

      ❤️🇬🇧

    • @valerielegasov2841
      @valerielegasov2841 Месяц назад +10

      @@gdutfulkbhh7537 you win the Internet today with that comment 🏆

    • @martynlewis9020
      @martynlewis9020 Месяц назад +13

      Yeah but maybe not fire warheads at this ship?

    • @paulobainz1210
      @paulobainz1210 Месяц назад +15

      @@martynlewis9020 Logic is lost here

  • @cntsay1
    @cntsay1 Месяц назад +674

    Ooooops my floating bomb accidentally broke down in the most inconvenient spot,,,,soooo sorry.

    • @williamearls2021
      @williamearls2021 Месяц назад +25

      Timothy McVeigh knocked down Oklahoma City Federal Bldg. with a mere van of ammonia nitrate....so multiply that blast by 500-1000 X ammonia nitrate volume....could get real messy !

    • @warbuzzard7167
      @warbuzzard7167 Месяц назад +6

      What’s the deal with you guys and your commas? Never could figure out why people do that. You are obviously not spending quality time curled up with your Strunk and White’s “Elements of Style” guide…

    • @richarddodge1349
      @richarddodge1349 Месяц назад +16

      You mean twenty kilotons, not twenty thousand kilotons.

    • @YouTube_username.
      @YouTube_username. Месяц назад +3

      @@warbuzzard7167 i assume it has to do with comma being one pixel off a period in the tiny kb ui

    • @Davidcallard
      @Davidcallard Месяц назад +16

      In the worst possible place at the worst possible time! This stunt by the runt of Russia has his fingerprints all over it. It should be returned to the sender...with interest .

  • @DTR2K
    @DTR2K Месяц назад +22

    Threatened us now all off a sudden we have basically a bomb on our shores 7 times greater than beruit, have a feeling somethings about to go down

    • @gregorysias6090
      @gregorysias6090 Месяц назад

      better get proactive and stop talking about it.. apparently your lives depend upon it.

  • @Jonasbarbury
    @Jonasbarbury Месяц назад +13

    20,000 kilotons? Thats a 20 megaton blast . That ship couldn't carry enough conventional explosives to create a blast like that

    • @MAINTMAN73
      @MAINTMAN73 Месяц назад +5

      I'm glad I'm not the only one that listens to the guy's statement did the math in his head and said that ain't quite right

  • @twoeggcups
    @twoeggcups Месяц назад +133

    It's not "stuck", it has been anchored there deliberately.

    • @quesoestbonne
      @quesoestbonne Месяц назад +12

      It's also very close to, if not directly over, two undersea electric connectors between the UK and Europe. These two currently provide ~6.5% of UK electricity.
      Is it a Putin payback for hus Nordstream gas pipelines being destroyed?

    • @nickhumphries6220
      @nickhumphries6220 Месяц назад +2

      Proof?

    • @twoeggcups
      @twoeggcups Месяц назад +10

      @@nickhumphries6220 Well, it didn’t drift to that spot and it’s lying at anchor so how much “proof” do you need, exactly?

    • @nickhumphries6220
      @nickhumphries6220 Месяц назад +4

      @@twoeggcups Still not proof. The best spot for the UK is off the coast at Easington where all the gas comes in. Oops did I just give away a state secret. Maybe off Scotland where all the oil comes in. Oops another secret. Get real. Parking a damaged boat bound for Malta (I think it was) is normal. I suppose you would be happier parking it off the coast of France, maybe Holland. Hold on did I not read somewhere it's rudder is damaged? That would explain why it has not sailed up the Thames yet.

    • @twoeggcups
      @twoeggcups Месяц назад +4

      @@nickhumphries6220 Ruby is anchored just outside the Thames estuary. What if she set sail for central London?

  • @zopEnglandzip
    @zopEnglandzip Месяц назад +58

    He said 20,000 kilotons which would be 20 megatons.
    "Experts" shouldn't be making mistakes like that.

    • @ZigSputnik
      @ZigSputnik Месяц назад +2

      That can't be correct anyway. You would need a nuclear device for that sort of yield.

    • @jul1440
      @jul1440 Месяц назад +3

      @@ZigSputnik or literally 20 million tons of TNT, far beyond the capacity of the largest cargo ship.

    • @danielbliss1988
      @danielbliss1988 Месяц назад +2

      @@jul1440 the capacity of a large FLEET of cargo ships. A thousand cargo ships.

    • @peterpadazopoulos2954
      @peterpadazopoulos2954 Месяц назад +3

      No such this as expert .more like activists

    • @jul1440
      @jul1440 Месяц назад

      @@danielbliss1988 At least 100 of the largest!

  • @TimothyCollins
    @TimothyCollins Месяц назад +337

    Consider this - russia is a country that wants to be seen as a superpower and yet they are reduced to basically the same tactics as the unabomber.

    • @crimsongrease6382
      @crimsongrease6382 Месяц назад +12

      @@TimothyCollins classic..

    • @sawtooth808
      @sawtooth808 Месяц назад +3

      🤣🤣🤣🪦 Deceased

    • @lukeknight1133
      @lukeknight1133 Месяц назад +3

      XD

    • @Brice23
      @Brice23 Месяц назад +20

      Do you know anything about the unabomber? This is the tactic McVeigh used, not the unabomber.

    • @northof49
      @northof49 Месяц назад

      Russia is a terrorist state.

  • @WilliamFairfield-qq2tq
    @WilliamFairfield-qq2tq Месяц назад +21

    Get your facts straight. More bs from British press.

  • @Alnero80
    @Alnero80 Месяц назад +24

    I worry we are assuming too much. We also assumed Russia would not invade Ukraine..

    • @sleelofwpg688
      @sleelofwpg688 Месяц назад

      Only morons assumed that. They proved, repeatedly, that they don't honour treaties.
      They invaded Chechnya, twice. Georgia. A false flag invasion of Ukraine's east, annexation of Crimea.
      Only the kind of slack-jaws who thought selling out Czechoslovakia in 1938, think doing the same to Ukraine will mean
      pEaCe In OuR tImE
      This time.

    • @GazGuitarz
      @GazGuitarz Месяц назад +1

      This guy is full of it. BS that is.

    • @Olly-f9b
      @Olly-f9b Месяц назад +3

      Do you know why Putin invaded Ukraine?

    • @Ducatipete
      @Ducatipete Месяц назад

      Who's "we". The invasion of Ukraine was seen coming from miles away.

  • @Hjaltland2
    @Hjaltland2 Месяц назад +177

    Total immersion in salt water should fix it !

    • @texasslingleadsomtingwong8751
      @texasslingleadsomtingwong8751 Месяц назад +9

      And how would you convince this vessel to sink ?

    • @Sickofitall-76
      @Sickofitall-76 Месяц назад

      Sooooo your genius idea is to poison the water with a hazardous and toxic substance?! Does it hurt when you think?! Idiot!

    • @SA12String
      @SA12String Месяц назад +8

      @@texasslingleadsomtingwong8751 It IS possible to punch holes in ships without explosives, you know.

    • @SariClark-z9j
      @SariClark-z9j Месяц назад +2

      ​@@SA12Stringwithout sparks?

    • @xstugee
      @xstugee Месяц назад +3

      @@SariClark-z9j Yeah...its called "below the water line"...GET IT!!

  • @concernedrabbit9075
    @concernedrabbit9075 Месяц назад +337

    If this explodes it should be considered an act of war.

    • @grahamd8356
      @grahamd8356 Месяц назад +40

      Stop watching the news

    • @valerielegasov2841
      @valerielegasov2841 Месяц назад +53

      @@grahamd8356 another Vatnik bot

    • @24540082
      @24540082 Месяц назад +47

      Just its precence is an act of war

    • @ashj8998
      @ashj8998 Месяц назад

      Er hello, we are at war, proxy war, grow up

    • @dz7786
      @dz7786 Месяц назад

      ​@@grahamd8356c'mon 🤡 we can but you can't? 🤣 Sure sounds like you're not coping well with the special military failure 🤡

  • @artfx9
    @artfx9 Месяц назад +98

    Imagine being the crew on that ship. Holy sheeet!
    I bet they are itching for a smoke 🚬

    • @jamesdykes517
      @jamesdykes517 Месяц назад +1

      I think that smoke leads directly to their end... You were talking about the Russian missiles on standby...

    • @artfx9
      @artfx9 Месяц назад +8

      @@jamesdykes517 I don't know what you mean. Your translation from ruzzki is not good, Ivan.

    • @ofeyofey
      @ofeyofey Месяц назад

      They must be suicidal.

    • @jamesdykes517
      @jamesdykes517 Месяц назад

      @@artfx9 oh I get it. I mean they are clearly on a suicide mission and a cigarette blowing them up isn't what the what they're stressed about. It's the being the guidance on a bomb. Poor unfortunate fools trapped by Putin's greed.
      Sorry you didn't understand my point. I did make it a bit obscure.

    • @bw7228
      @bw7228 Месяц назад +3

      If it’s Russian they probably still smoking 😂😅

  • @jonathanmormerod
    @jonathanmormerod Месяц назад +55

    People are missing the point completely here. The UK has to import all of its artificial fertiliser now and much of it comes from Russia and Ukraine.
    Ironically, the last UK fertiliser factory was in the process of closing down just as Russia invaded Ukraine. The government had the opportunity to put together a rescue package (which wouldn't have cost all that much) and failed to lift a finger. The upshot was a quadrupling in the price of artificial fertiliser which has had a knock-on effect on the economic viability of arable farms and has helped to stimulate and maintain food inflation.

    • @MrTryReasoning
      @MrTryReasoning Месяц назад

      I would like to know what artificial fertiliser is?? Why is it called artificial? Is it made from real nutrients?

    • @scottjohnstone6204
      @scottjohnstone6204 Месяц назад +1

      Synthetically created as opposed to natural extraction usually things like nitrogen and potassium are by products of industrial processes and just relabelled as nutrients!
      It extends into our food chain also, which is a big debate, are Synthetically produced nutrients as nutritious as naturally extracted, and I would wager no way.

    • @1djbecker
      @1djbecker Месяц назад +1

      @@MrTryReasoning It's made from hydrocarbons, typically 'natural gas'/methane. Fertilizer is typically made from products that are a side feed from a large refinery, especially when they have no consumers for the light fractions.

    • @yvettethornton4629
      @yvettethornton4629 Месяц назад +5

      It's about time someone spoke up about this
      Well said !

    • @PhimbleG-d
      @PhimbleG-d Месяц назад

      We shouldn’t be buying anything from friggin’ Russia

  • @clivefarquharson1748
    @clivefarquharson1748 Месяц назад +4

    I believe that this is not a coincidence. UK needs to take precautions.

  • @hb9145
    @hb9145 Месяц назад +101

    We just had that ship in Norway. Typical Russia.

    • @v1das007
      @v1das007 Месяц назад +30

      They asked for permission to park it in our harbor in Klaipeda, Lithuania a couple weeks ago, when Norway didn't accept them. The whole story doesn't make any sense, if they can cross the whole North and Baltic seas to reach our port, why can't they go back to their own harbor? Something is really fishy about this whole thing.

    • @Espiritu-o7x
      @Espiritu-o7x Месяц назад +6

      @v1das007 Sveiki,
      Niekada nenustebkite, jei Putinas nesukurs tikslingos problemos, o paskui bus tas, kuris bandys ją išspręsti visos žmonijos labui.

    • @michaelotieno6524
      @michaelotieno6524 Месяц назад +2

      @@v1das007 They did not ask for permission to park it in Lithuania. The ship left the Russian port near Murmansk headed for Lithuania on the way it had an accident and stopped at the Norwegian port of Tromso. The Norwegians inspected it at the port of Tromso and certified it fit to sail along with a tug, when it reached its original destination of Lithuania the authorities turned it back for "safety reasons". it is anchored off the coast of UK waiting to refuel.

    • @v1das007
      @v1das007 Месяц назад +2

      @@michaelotieno6524 Our government says otherwise. I'm not sure where you are getting your info.

    • @robr177
      @robr177 Месяц назад +2

      @@v1das007 Russian internet troll spreading misinformation?

  • @kimweaver1252
    @kimweaver1252 Месяц назад +74

    Not 20,000 kilotons of TNT... the standard explosive. 20 kilotons of a low grade explosive .... ammonium nitrate. The same thing that leveled Beirut's docks, but not a high explosive.

    • @highjump81a
      @highjump81a Месяц назад +5

      Mixed with TNT, as an extender, it makes 'Amatol'. This was regularly used in underground mines below German lines and as filler for artillery shells during WW1 because they couldn't make enough TNT. Also regularly used mixed with diesel as a mining explosive. It's good enough to level a portion of Beirut. This is quite a lot more.

    • @kimweaver1252
      @kimweaver1252 Месяц назад +3

      @@highjump81a But...... the relatively pure am. nitrate is not nearly as potent an explosive as TNT, pound for pound. You can also mix aluminum powder with it and get a spicier mix..... Tannerite.

    • @michaelkimber6203
      @michaelkimber6203 Месяц назад

      You beat me to it. 👌

    • @MC-b2movies
      @MC-b2movies Месяц назад +3

      What would happen if there was 10K of TNT in the middle of the Ammonium Nitrate and it was set off. .???

    • @Melanie16040
      @Melanie16040 Месяц назад +4

      Ammonium Nitrate 100% is a High Explosive.

  • @valerielegasov2841
    @valerielegasov2841 Месяц назад +82

    EDITED - This is the one that was stuck in between Sweden and Denmark that was due to go to Lithuania for servicing. Lithuania denied it entry due to the cargo. Wouldn't surprise me if it had exploded by accident while in the port. What a way to take resources from Ukraine?

    • @runtsgal
      @runtsgal Месяц назад +16

      I think it’s the same one. Denmark refused to allow it entry.

    • @nickhtk6285
      @nickhtk6285 Месяц назад +2

      Is that the same one off the Norwegian coast?

    • @lifessogood2995
      @lifessogood2995 Месяц назад

      Maybe Russian is just temporary fishing

    • @valerielegasov2841
      @valerielegasov2841 Месяц назад +4

      @@lifessogood2995 with a 20kt grenade 😆

    • @valerielegasov2841
      @valerielegasov2841 Месяц назад +6

      @@nickhtk6285 yes it is.

  • @kevincorbett-x9n
    @kevincorbett-x9n Месяц назад +6

    It’s miles away and packed in different storage compartments these ships have been going around the world for years stop been dramatic it won’t blow up if it does there will be a big splash miles from us it’s not in our port

  • @CynthiaBlair
    @CynthiaBlair Месяц назад

    Always good to hear Hamish De Bretton's expertise on this subject :)

  • @brianscott6171
    @brianscott6171 Месяц назад +68

    If the UK Gov is that worried get it away from UK waters by getting tug boats on it .

    • @mk1st
      @mk1st Месяц назад +28

      At the tug boat union hall:
      “I need a volunteer”

    • @raywarman
      @raywarman Месяц назад +4

      Not this Government?

    • @franceyneireland1633
      @franceyneireland1633 Месяц назад +3

      Tow it back to Port of St. Petersburg harbour.

    • @jonathanheyse5314
      @jonathanheyse5314 Месяц назад +4

      Putin should handle this. This vessel clearly needs to return to Russia.

    • @dagwould
      @dagwould Месяц назад +11

      The UK government has no skill in turning away boats.

  • @Fidd88-mc4sz
    @Fidd88-mc4sz Месяц назад +9

    20,000 tons is 20 kilotons, not 20,000 kilotons. (as is stated twice in this film) On the water, 20 kilotons is of concern but if 7-10 miles distant, I'd not expect this to be a problem beyond breaking windows and some wave damage ashore. Although ammonium sulphate is dangerous, especially in hot weather, I would not expect it detonate unless it was old, hot, and ill-stored.

  • @steve.k4735
    @steve.k4735 Месяц назад +129

    It is now floating three kilometres outside British waters north of Margate, east of the Thames Estuary, seemingly awaiting permission to enter the Strait of Dover .. in case you are wondering

    • @brucewilliams2106
      @brucewilliams2106 Месяц назад +20

      thanks. so that's outside the 12 nm limit? but within the EEZ. seems like they could find a good reason to seize based on pollution threat.

    • @peterlaurie1247
      @peterlaurie1247 Месяц назад +7

      There's a sunken ammunition ship from the 2ndww, also off the north Kent coast. Maybe they're that one safe by now.

    • @DarrenSmith-tq2xz
      @DarrenSmith-tq2xz Месяц назад

      Putin has already said that if stormshaow missiles are used to attack inside Russia then he will use hypersonic missiles and we can say good by too London he isn't bluffing we nearly got newclear Inialated 2 weeks ago

    • @ruthmckay9086
      @ruthmckay9086 Месяц назад

      ​@@peterlaurie1247
      "The SS Richard Montgomery, a World War II American Liberty cargo ship, is a sunken wreck in the Thames Estuary that contains approximately 1,400 tons of explosives. The ship's cargo included:
      286 high explosive bombs weighing 910 kg each
      4,439 bombs weighing 450 kg each
      1,925 bombs weighing 230 kg each
      2,815 fragmentation bombs and bomb clusters
      Explosive booster charges
      Phosphorus bombs
      Smoke bombs
      Pyrotechnic signals
      The ship sank in August 1944 after grounding on the Nore sandbank, near Sheerness, Kent, England. Salvage efforts were made immediately, but the ship sank before they could be completed.
      The wreck's condition is monitored regularly by the Maritime and Coastguard Agency (MCA). The MCA considers the risk of a major explosion to be remote, but they still monitor the site to ensure any changes are discovered quickly.
      Some experts believe that the authorities should try to remove the explosives, but the work would be expensive and would need to be done with great care. The ship's structure is deteriorating rapidly, and in the worst case scenario, the explosion could cause a minor tsunami-like event. "

    • @jimmunro4649
      @jimmunro4649 Месяц назад

      Starmer will ok it he hates ENGLAND

  • @InnSewerAnts
    @InnSewerAnts Месяц назад +2

    Unless it's inside a harbor or beached next to a coastal city it's not as bad as it sounds.
    A surface detonation on water of 20 kt according to nukemap: heavy blast damage radius: 590 meters, moderate dmg radius: 1.24km, light dmg radius: 3.2 km.
    As long as you can keep them 4km or more from the coast, it'll just be a light show in the distance and not one window will break in the UK if it blows. Just don't let it get closer than that to anyone.

    • @gazzyhook7784
      @gazzyhook7784 Месяц назад

      Pardon. Can you repeat that please.😁

  • @TheMrPhiladelphia
    @TheMrPhiladelphia Месяц назад +2

    iam upset as an American we dont come in and stick up for the UK against Russia

  • @catchaser52
    @catchaser52 Месяц назад +85

    Tow it back to Russia.

    • @annaoeste2470
      @annaoeste2470 Месяц назад +12

      Gotta find people to work the tug boats. I imagine no volunteers.

    • @mastermindvideos898
      @mastermindvideos898 Месяц назад +10

      maybe ask a migrant boat if they could help you with that

    • @johnguest4525
      @johnguest4525 Месяц назад +6

      @@annaoeste2470
      Ukraine`s sea drones could tow it back to a russian port

    • @JohnMP1963
      @JohnMP1963 Месяц назад +4

      @@mastermindvideos898 Yes, either Iran or China since they are helping Russia, I'm sure they wouldn't mind

    • @Hamish-f4b
      @Hamish-f4b Месяц назад +5

      @@annaoeste2470 Long, very long tow lines?

  • @davidthompson6636
    @davidthompson6636 Месяц назад +77

    It’s Halifax once more.

    • @brianferguson7840
      @brianferguson7840 Месяц назад +9

      As a retired firefighter who has studied that incident, I thought I was the only one who would remember it.

    • @northleedspoppa
      @northleedspoppa Месяц назад +14

      Thats Canada Halifax?
      If so solid reference

    • @northstar7694
      @northstar7694 Месяц назад +5

      I was thinking the same

    • @octaviantimisoreanu5810
      @octaviantimisoreanu5810 Месяц назад +3

      @@northleedspoppa yes the mont blanc

    • @pierreabbat6157
      @pierreabbat6157 Месяц назад +3

      Just what I was thinking. For those who haven't read about it, a ship carrying explosives/munitions for war, annoyed at being delayed by submarine nets, collided with another ship because a ship was on the wrong side and exploded, causing great destruction.

  • @01karmacop
    @01karmacop Месяц назад +153

    We cant stop rubber boats

    • @ginojaco
      @ginojaco Месяц назад +16

      Not true, we can, it's just that we have not had and do not have a government willing to do so. 👍

    • @01karmacop
      @01karmacop Месяц назад +8

      @@ginojaco so true buddy

    • @zulubeatz1
      @zulubeatz1 Месяц назад +10

      +10 for deflection. It's immigrants, not Russia threatening to blow up Britain

    • @ginojaco
      @ginojaco Месяц назад +4

      @@zulubeatz1 Yes, but that's only because Russia knows it hasn't good enough tech to manage the job...

    • @Stevekpb
      @Stevekpb Месяц назад

      Yeah because they are carrying 20,000 tonnes of ammonium nitrate on a rubber boat.... 🤣 Anything to draw attention away from the topic....

  • @Stefan_Boerjesson
    @Stefan_Boerjesson Месяц назад

    For whom was that vessel loaded originally? What does the shipping company say?

  • @ds6690
    @ds6690 Месяц назад +16

    Please don't underestimate Russia and its capabilities. Don't become a Target. Be safe.

    • @sarahosman4933
      @sarahosman4933 Месяц назад

      ..too late...not possible the World HAS NEVER BEEN A SAFE PLACE....MORONS!

  • @briancharles1141
    @briancharles1141 Месяц назад +98

    Send that ship back now rite now we dont want any putin ships in our warters simple

  • @gee3883
    @gee3883 Месяц назад +12

    Timing's about right as Zelenski asks for long range storm shadow to be used inside Russia.

  • @dpelpal
    @dpelpal Месяц назад +90

    Ship problem are emblem of Russia problems: Poverty of ppl. Corruptions. But most of all poverty

    • @dpelpal
      @dpelpal Месяц назад +12

      @boota1989 In Russia standard-of-life is lower than Peru. This is why.

    • @jsaintr.i.r4018
      @jsaintr.i.r4018 Месяц назад +7

      ​@@dpelpala lot of problems in Russia 🥶

    • @dpelpal
      @dpelpal Месяц назад +5

      @@jsaintr.i.r4018 Yes Sir, that is mild way of putting things🤷🏼‍♀️

    • @gurnoorsingh4595
      @gurnoorsingh4595 Месяц назад +6

      Well you should care about your own country vast majority of people in UK cant afford simple living at the moment. So standard of liv8ng in your country is probably lower than RUSSIA because you dont have any sanctions 😂😂😂😂

    • @SebastiaanBikker
      @SebastiaanBikker Месяц назад +4

      ​@@dpelpalYou have no idea... Russia debt gdp ratio is the lowest ! 18%
      Compare it with other countrys.. ever been to Russia ?

  • @williamrobinson1453
    @williamrobinson1453 Месяц назад +12

    If it's Times Radio you know there is nothing to worry about.

    • @zaphoddog3878
      @zaphoddog3878 Месяц назад

      ты стоишь раскрытым

    • @zaphoddog3878
      @zaphoddog3878 Месяц назад

      ты стоишь раскрытым

    • @williamrobinson1453
      @williamrobinson1453 Месяц назад +2

      @@zaphoddog3878 You mean the UK is wide open? Yes, I agree, but I was making the point that Times Radio is propagandising.

  • @ncdave4life
    @ncdave4life Месяц назад +40

    Good grief, *Times Radio,* the *_first 15 seconds_* of this video is innumerate nonsense.
    0:01 _"we've now got a boat, a ship, which apparently is in a very poor state, with 20,000 tons_ [of ammonium nitrate fertilizer]. If that explodes it will explode with the power of 20,000 kilotons of conventional explosive.."_
    20,000 ton = 20 kilotons, not 20,000 kilotons.

    • @PercyPruneMHDOIFandBars
      @PercyPruneMHDOIFandBars Месяц назад +2

      Even if it did, the blast radius would barely reach the shore!

    • @DaveTheRave-sd9yc
      @DaveTheRave-sd9yc Месяц назад +4

      yeah that would be 20 megatons he probably mispoke but maybe not who know with these fearmongers endlessly ramping things up...

    • @FTW523.
      @FTW523. Месяц назад +2

      Not worried 😯 im in Yorkshire

    • @fritula6200
      @fritula6200 Месяц назад +2

      Thank ncdave... very observant.... l would say more than that.... you are bloody smart !!!! Whoooppeee

    • @GazGuitarz
      @GazGuitarz Месяц назад +1

      What's a few zeros among friends.

  •  Месяц назад +93

    The sailers on board must be under some considerable stress.

    • @crimsongrease6382
      @crimsongrease6382 Месяц назад +14

      I bet their queuing for the toilet onboard that ship..

    • @6yjjk
      @6yjjk Месяц назад +28

      Gagging for a cigarette

    • @deanhil3978
      @deanhil3978 Месяц назад +18

      Careful with that Doobie!

    • @texasslingleadsomtingwong8751
      @texasslingleadsomtingwong8751 Месяц назад

      Its Russians, they smoking next to the stuff .

    • @sbkr4906
      @sbkr4906 Месяц назад

      they all are Syrians, allies of Russians

  • @RaymondBastien-li6co
    @RaymondBastien-li6co Месяц назад +51

    How to recognize propaganda:
    1) When given a problem, fear rather than reason is used to present the solution.
    2) When you're pressured into accepting the solution.
    3) When you're not allowed to question the solution.
    4) When the solution involves surrendering your freedoms.
    5) When your eyes see one thing, but you are compelled to believe a different thing.
    6) When the solution means giving small groups of people control over larger and larger things.
    7) When dissenters are censored for refusing to accept the solution.
    8) When dissenters are targeted by accusations from different sources, suddenly and all at once.

    • @Deadlycalling
      @Deadlycalling Месяц назад +3

      Sounds like the avg day for any Brit who wants control of England's borders

    • @bivvystridents3752
      @bivvystridents3752 Месяц назад +10

      Or, just look at the source... If it's Russian, it's lies.

    • @RaymondBastien-li6co
      @RaymondBastien-li6co Месяц назад

      @@bivvystridents3752 denied. Russia is living evidence of its righteousness. They are not wrong.

    • @allengreg5447
      @allengreg5447 Месяц назад +1

      Exactly what Dubya did to give himself more power after the 9/11 attacks.

    • @sidsuspicious
      @sidsuspicious Месяц назад

      @@Deadlycalling Does it? You don't sound British, you sound like a total w⚓.

  • @MrHansklamer
    @MrHansklamer Месяц назад +4

    Beirut - - On 4 August 2020, a large amount of ammonium nitrate stored at the Port of Beirut in the capital city of Lebanon exploded, causing at least 218 deaths, 7,000 injuries, and US$15 billion in property damage, as well as leaving an estimated 300,000 people homeless.

  • @witchywoman564
    @witchywoman564 Месяц назад +2

    Js..its on water, the danger would be the repercussion radius and "shrapnel " there would be an issue with the behavior of the water coming ashore after detonation

  • @collinbillingsley9798
    @collinbillingsley9798 Месяц назад

    Thank you Mr. Hamish for the insights!

  • @draculasneeze6681
    @draculasneeze6681 Месяц назад +22

    the only boat that has been stopped in the channel in the last decade.

  • @52n1
    @52n1 Месяц назад +176

    I think he meant 20 kilo tons not 20,000 kilo tons which would be 20 mega tons.

    • @jocopowell
      @jocopowell Месяц назад +9

      ^^ Definitely. 20 megatons would be almost half tsar bomba.

    • @abofrey
      @abofrey Месяц назад +16

      Experts hey?

    • @52n1
      @52n1 Месяц назад +24

      @@abofrey You don’t need to be an expert to know what the prefixes kilo and mega mean. 😃

    • @Chr1s-fm6bi
      @Chr1s-fm6bi Месяц назад +13

      @@abofreygod forbid someone slips while speaking. 20 kilo or megatons of explosives is still dangerous. 🙄

    • @kurtwicklund8901
      @kurtwicklund8901 Месяц назад +20

      This "expert" isn't. TNT and Am nitrate are not equivalent by weight.

  • @jc3885
    @jc3885 Месяц назад +36

    This must be the escalation everyone was afraid of. Time to give Ukraine the gloves-off signal.

    • @daveotter7942
      @daveotter7942 Месяц назад +5

      Don't be ridiculous.

    • @Joe-td9zw
      @Joe-td9zw Месяц назад

      Ye. Because we really need to escalate this

    • @Cabalero24
      @Cabalero24 Месяц назад

      только идиоты паникуют от каждого "сенсационного" сообщения из телевизора.
      большая посылка у твоих дверей?
      а где ей следует быть если её заказали в британию? её надо было отвезти в африку?!
      теледиктору платят большие деньги чтоб по другую сторону телевизора люди со слабыми мозгами требовали отдать больше полномочий ворам в парламенте.

  • @jackbelk8527
    @jackbelk8527 Месяц назад +1

    I've told him forty million times to quit exaggerating! "Fertilizer" is not configured with accelerant to make 'pearl' and even then pearl (bulk mining explosive)takes dynamite to set it off.

  • @captnaberystwyth2879
    @captnaberystwyth2879 Месяц назад +6

    So.. The fertiliser we need is an issue?

  • @jimg2850
    @jimg2850 Месяц назад +103

    There is no legitimate reason for a ship to be sailing around with that kind of dangerous cargo on it. This is a potential article 5 moment!

    • @ykst6685
      @ykst6685 Месяц назад +9

      Putin may have sent this ship - fall short of nuclear weapons use - but has enough power to have the same effect.

    • @HGSuper
      @HGSuper Месяц назад +5

      ​@@ykst6685and of course it would release the taps giving long range weapons to Ukraine.

    • @1605Will
      @1605Will Месяц назад +20

      Fertiliser ships are extremely normal, it is legitimate to cargo fertiliser around

    • @jonathanoxlade4252
      @jonathanoxlade4252 Месяц назад +3

      Article 5 would be judgment day

    • @thehappyclam3942
      @thehappyclam3942 Месяц назад +2

      Article 5 doesn't apply to Great Britain because they have preemptively attacked Russia with storm shadow missiles.

  • @runtsgal
    @runtsgal Месяц назад +15

    It’s too close to the wreck off the Montgomery with that amount of potential explosive material onboard.

    • @6yjjk
      @6yjjk Месяц назад +3

      My first thought. "Accidentally" drift into that, bad day.

    • @StuBobsGhost
      @StuBobsGhost Месяц назад +2

      There's the whole of Kent in the way. As long as it's kept out of the Thames estuary there's no chance of an explosion on one setting off the other.

    • @beeble2003
      @beeble2003 Месяц назад

      What are you talking about? It's about 35 miles from the wreck of the SS Richard Montgomery.

    • @runtsgal
      @runtsgal Месяц назад +1

      @@beeble2003 I was thinking of an underwater shockwave or if they bring it in closer for refuelling/ unloading. I don’t know if that will happen now since it’s been a few days but I still think my concern was justifiable.

  • @davepfizer
    @davepfizer Месяц назад +1

    According to AIS Ruby is sitting 30Km off the coast of Margate. That is not close. If the AIS goes off and because it would have to be physically turned off deliberately and it was done at dusk and the thing starts to head up the Thames with only other ships and radar to confirm its position then start to worry.

  • @JEng-oc1lc
    @JEng-oc1lc Месяц назад +26

    Messing up up Earth

    • @s0ycapitan
      @s0ycapitan Месяц назад

      What, Nitrogen fertilizer that has fed the World.
      Fertilizer we cant make any more because our power is massively overpriced.

  • @yeoman223
    @yeoman223 Месяц назад +3

    well done Labour government....the Royal Fleet Auxiliary used to help out the Royal Navy in this situation...but they are now on strike....outstanding management by the MOD eh

    • @lynnecox6431
      @lynnecox6431 Месяц назад

      @@yeoman223 why are they on strike?

  • @birgitskouboelling7631
    @birgitskouboelling7631 Месяц назад +13

    It should not be allowed at all

    • @mastermindvideos898
      @mastermindvideos898 Месяц назад

      the amount of nuclear weapons in american submarines is more shocking then anything the north sea is full of it

  • @3li.B
    @3li.B Месяц назад +1

    Me who lives in Margate and can see the ship out of my bedroom window at any time 😅 0:01

  • @barrakuda331
    @barrakuda331 Месяц назад

    Great interview, and wise answers and explanations. Much appreciated.

  • @tommymorrison6478
    @tommymorrison6478 Месяц назад +9

    Perhaps it's worth reminding the frothier characters that the ship is in international waters, and last I looked was around 26 miles off the British coast. She'd have to be carrying a nuke for any explosion to impact the UK from that distance.

    • @fins59
      @fins59 Месяц назад +1

      Actually it's anchored 18 miles from Margate and 16 miles from the coast, it's exact position is: 51.51451151937695, 1.75197601318359

    • @tommymorrison6478
      @tommymorrison6478 Месяц назад

      @@fins59 Thank you, and yes you're quite right. But (a) she's still in international waters and (b) she'd still need to carry a nuke to cause damage to the UK mainland. This is just the tory press, as always, trying to turn every little thing into a stick to beat Labour over the head with.

  • @donnarmills9902
    @donnarmills9902 Месяц назад +111

    WHY are ships allowed to carry that amount?

    • @danafender6312
      @danafender6312 Месяц назад

      It's Russia. They have no regards for safety or common sense.

    • @zakjuly6721
      @zakjuly6721 Месяц назад +25

      well google how much fertiliser Britain imports every year 😂..... how old are you ?

    • @garbennett4758
      @garbennett4758 Месяц назад +15

      It's Russia your dealing with

    • @kurtwicklund8901
      @kurtwicklund8901 Месяц назад +4

      Because clearly industry can do so safely.

    • @catchaser52
      @catchaser52 Месяц назад +15

      @@zakjuly6721 Be Nice!

  • @Dad-Gad
    @Dad-Gad Месяц назад +3

    Imagine the hypocrisy of the UK and USA calling other countries tyrants lol .

  • @sgthaggis1448
    @sgthaggis1448 Месяц назад +2

    Underestimating Putin is this guys first mistake, he should freshen up on his Math too.

  • @joecampbell6486
    @joecampbell6486 Месяц назад +1

    SLAVA RUSSIA,

  • @markaskew
    @markaskew Месяц назад +9

    The UK should have kept out of the US proxy war. I very much doubt the US businesses that have already invested in the $10 trillion dollars worth of gold and lithium that needs mining in Ukraine are going to share any of it!

  • @givemeabreak8784
    @givemeabreak8784 Месяц назад +15

    Stop moaning. Sease the boat gives the fertiliser to Jeremy Clarkson for Diddly Squat farm. Job done.

    • @simongore
      @simongore Месяц назад +2

      Given Jeremy's love of blowing things up - maybe not the best idea .

  • @CyberProductions-r2h
    @CyberProductions-r2h Месяц назад +59

    That will stop the dinghies wont it

    • @draculasneeze6681
      @draculasneeze6681 Месяц назад +4

      it is the most successful effort to stop/block the dinghies, why didn't UK think of that - surround the coast with boats.

    • @gedbyrom1503
      @gedbyrom1503 Месяц назад +3

      They will pick up supplies on the way.

  • @lynettestrachan8000
    @lynettestrachan8000 Месяц назад +1

    And who would move the ship? If its potentially dangerous, why not move it immediately? Think those residents in that area of a potential explosion must be very worried indeed.

  • @rongeorge574
    @rongeorge574 Месяц назад +1

    its only dangerous if there is oil also in the tanker. What powers the ship again?

  • @muschek
    @muschek Месяц назад +35

    20 k tons of ammonium nitrate corresponds to 5 k tons TNT. Hiroshima bomb ”little boy” had 12.5 k tons TNT equvalent. So the bomb was 2.5 x stronger. The expert claims that the ship cargo is 2 x stronger, so he exaggerated for the factor of 5!
    Please be objektive, we are not in ruzzia!

    • @willc1294
      @willc1294 Месяц назад +8

      not sure if anyone noticed that he actually said "twenty thousand kilotons" when I assume he simply meant to say twenty kilotons - lol 20,000 kilotons would be 20,000,000 tons or 20 megatons, tsar bomb range 🤣

    • @jadams3427
      @jadams3427 Месяц назад +3

      I notice this too. The expert also does not know how 'nuclear' is pronounced.

    • @ronnybe7994
      @ronnybe7994 Месяц назад +1

      But, isn't ammonium nitrate only one part of an explosive?
      Surely you need a fuel?

    • @damedusa5107
      @damedusa5107 Месяц назад +1

      He said tactical nuke. Which are smaller yield than that

    • @andreasferenczi7613
      @andreasferenczi7613 Месяц назад +1

      Besides he said it would explode with the power of 20 000 kilotons (0:07). Not 20 kilotons. How ammonium nitrate is supposed to have 1000 times the explosive yield of TNT is beyond me.

  • @nigelkingston7698
    @nigelkingston7698 Месяц назад +6

    There is an irritating bleating constantly coming from the UK...

  • @billy2807
    @billy2807 Месяц назад +14

    This is the "country" we're talking about making a deal with, right? The rf is the "country" that people are un-sarcastically talking about rewarding with Ukrainian territory.
    Am I understanding that right?

    • @unlockeduk
      @unlockeduk Месяц назад

      you mean terroist state not 'country'

    • @viksox13
      @viksox13 Месяц назад

      Biden basically sold Ukraine to Russia

    • @muckle8
      @muckle8 Месяц назад

      It’s a ship full of fertiliser not grenades .

    • @billy2807
      @billy2807 Месяц назад

      @muckle8 right. Because putin is a lying, manipulative coward. So, it's not TECHNICALLY a weapon...just a big ship that could blow up without russia facing the consequences (which they would not survive). "Shame if that type of "accident" happened so close to your shoreline..."
      It's standard mafia/coward/scumbag tactics.

    • @FlyingSofa28
      @FlyingSofa28 Месяц назад +2

      by 'we' your talking about trump and his loony toons circus right? In the alternate reality where he wins the election....?

  • @phatlaz1974
    @phatlaz1974 Месяц назад +2

    Needs to be borders and seized

  • @trafficlawvictoria6614
    @trafficlawvictoria6614 Месяц назад

    The Beirut blast was 1 kilotonne TNT equivalent from 2,500t of NH4NO3. A 20,000 kilotonnes TNT equivalent explosion from 20,000 tonnes of NH4NO3 is impossible. The biggest nuclear explosion ever produced was about 20,000 kilotonnes. I think he means 10 kilotonnes, which is about 10 times greater than the Beirut blast.

  • @leemaguire4331
    @leemaguire4331 Месяц назад +4

    please remember we do not turn away uninvited guests. Give the crew citizenship and store their ship with the other dinghys.

  • @zacharypower7674
    @zacharypower7674 Месяц назад +5

    Largest Conventional explosion on earth wasnt beirut. Not by a long shot. Beirut explosion was 0.2kt equivalent. Nowhere near the Halifax explosion (1917, 2.9kt) which is still, to this day, the largest accidental, man made, non nuclear explosion in history.
    Edit: Also, ammonium nitrate isnt a 1:1 with tnt. its about 45%. so 20000 tons of ammonium nitrate is a 9kt equivalent not a 20kt equivalent.

    • @davidfoley5128
      @davidfoley5128 Месяц назад

      Also the Fauld disaster in Staffordshire during ww2

  •  Месяц назад +4

    He is wrong. 20 000 tones amonium nitrate doesn't explode with force of 20kt of TNT. Relative effectivenss of amonium nitrate is 0.32 so 20000000kg * 0.32 = 6400000 so 6.4KT of TNT. LITTLE BOY was 12 to 14 kilotonnes in hiroshima.

  • @wilde1049
    @wilde1049 Месяц назад +1

    So the south coast is closed now, is it?

  • @Cheekychappy76
    @Cheekychappy76 Месяц назад

    Beirut explosion from 2020 was 2750 tonnes of ammonium nitrate. So basically 7 times that.

  • @196Stefan2
    @196Stefan2 Месяц назад +35

    20000 ton of Ammoniumnitrate do not have the explosive power of the same amount of conventional explosives (referred on TNT): in Beirut exploded an estimated amount of 4,5 kT NH4NO3, which gave a "yield" of ca. 800-1000 tons of TNT. The conversion factor is therefore roughly 5:1. 4000 tons TNT is still a huge blast, if detonated.
    But doesn't the UK have a very capable Navy? Sink the bucket in a save distance from land by some torpedoes. Ammoniumnitrate is very good soluble into water.

    • @P00009
      @P00009 Месяц назад +2

      No, no. It is commercial property. You suggest to attack a ship in neutral waters? What is about international waters 🤣? Like UK says NATO is not a threat, neither NO threat from Ammoniumnitrate as per words of course.

    • @radicallyrethinkingrailwaysina
      @radicallyrethinkingrailwaysina Месяц назад +11

      ​@P00009 Ivan you need to improve your English.

    • @class2instructor32
      @class2instructor32 Месяц назад +6

      Hello Alge bloom

    • @P00009
      @P00009 Месяц назад +1

      @@radicallyrethinkingrailwaysina I had no idea railway engineers were also grammar experts. I’ll keep that in mind for my next vocabulary test!

    • @196Stefan2
      @196Stefan2 Месяц назад +5

      @@P00009 What are you trying to say? If this vessel poses a threat to a nearby city and it's people on land, the UK has any right to dispose it safely. Force majeure...

  • @garywallis1720
    @garywallis1720 Месяц назад +35

    i wish people would stop say NUCULAR when they mean NUCLEAR

  • @karanrolands5861
    @karanrolands5861 Месяц назад +4

    Damaged before Murmansk ,sailed past . Tugs tow it back to Russia. Park it in a russian harbour

  • @Splodnik
    @Splodnik Месяц назад +1

    0:09: Hamish De Bretton overestimates the explosive power of 20 kilotons of ammonium nitrate by a factor of about 4000
    The ship is said to carry 20 kilotons of ammonium nitrate, which is equivalent (in explosive power) to 5 kilotons of TNT

  • @JamesLewis
    @JamesLewis Месяц назад +1

    It's either 20,000 tonnes, or 20 kilotonnes, not 20,000 kilotonnes... I'm sure if there was 20 MEGATONNES of explosives off the coast of Kent, we'd be a LOT more upset.

  • @robertstorey7476
    @robertstorey7476 Месяц назад +6

    I wouldn't be sticking around in Margate until its gone. It's probably as straightforward as it seems but you can't be 100% sure.

    • @wingzero7316
      @wingzero7316 Месяц назад

      If you in the UK stay away from major cities

    • @GLENLYNAS
      @GLENLYNAS Месяц назад

      Great....I live in Margate 😢

    • @robertstorey7476
      @robertstorey7476 Месяц назад

      @GLENLYNAS I'm sure it'll be fine but no harm in making sure your will is up to date.

    • @FlyingSofa28
      @FlyingSofa28 Месяц назад

      ​@@wingzero7316😂 sure thing comrade lol

  • @Paulo-ov4yo
    @Paulo-ov4yo Месяц назад +28

    Theirs already a US munitions ship that sank during WW2 in the Thames estuary that is fully laden and could potentially go off with the power of a small nuke.

    • @super_happy_alien509
      @super_happy_alien509 Месяц назад +8

      Shhh don't tell the russian spys on this comment section,, your no james bond !!!

    • @jaapster1273
      @jaapster1273 Месяц назад +5

      Probably why the Russian ship is/wants to be close to the sunken ship and then go "it wasn't us!, it was the other ship that went off while we were passing by!".

    • @ruzziasht349
      @ruzziasht349 Месяц назад +1

      @@super_happy_alien509 you're not English are you.

    • @jimjoelliejack
      @jimjoelliejack Месяц назад

      It’s in the Medway not far from Chatham docks.

    • @pippin1ful
      @pippin1ful Месяц назад +3

      @@jimjoelliejack Just outside of the Medway. I've sailed past it, the SS Richard Montgomery.

  • @-old-school-motorcyclesltd
    @-old-school-motorcyclesltd Месяц назад +49

    very strange why that's hanging about near us !! 😮

    • @dpelpal
      @dpelpal Месяц назад +10

      Because Russia is poverty country, does not have a standards. I know, I live here

    • @Prospero-z1s
      @Prospero-z1s Месяц назад

      ​​@@dpelpalSo is the UK and we're wasting money that we need by sending it to the Ukraine. We're also annoying Mr Putin which is something which most people don't support but our treasonous government is not following the requests of the people. This is not our war.

    • @davec9399
      @davec9399 Месяц назад +6

      Strange but no accident.

    • @dpelpal
      @dpelpal Месяц назад +4

      @@davec9399 Due to poverty. Low.standard of ship-maintenance if u know Russia ship

    • @ArtGirl82
      @ArtGirl82 Месяц назад +6

      the Russian military has a way of being places they're not supposed to be, and I don't just mean Ukraine. Why should their unsupervised weapons be any different. You'd be shocked by how often the Canadian Navy and Air Force get buzzed by Russian jets in our air space or while in allied waters.

  • @georgevarros4323
    @georgevarros4323 Месяц назад +1

    1:52 "20,000 tons"
    1:58 "It will explode with the power of 20,000 kt of conventional explosives" .
    20,000 tons is only 20 kilo tons

  • @MsHumble4
    @MsHumble4 Месяц назад

    If that scares the country… Stop the war in Ukraine. Full Stop.

  • @apurvnandy3077
    @apurvnandy3077 Месяц назад +30

    where was the royal navy? aren't they supposed to keep them away??!

    • @semirecumbentoneYT
      @semirecumbentoneYT Месяц назад

      This sounds as fake news. No country would let the vessel near coast or definitely not harbours, knewing its content.

    • @Mielikki-ng7zu
      @Mielikki-ng7zu Месяц назад +10

      The migrants have more chance of towing it away, they got more boats than us lol

    • @gee3883
      @gee3883 Месяц назад +2

      It's not in UK waters, needs to be within three miles of our shores.

    • @JsJourney-nz7ci
      @JsJourney-nz7ci Месяц назад +5

      @@gee3883 Incorrect.....there are NO International waters in the English Channel. There are UK waters and there are French waters, the English Channel is almost unique in this respect. Any foreign registered ships using the English Channel do so in good faith.

    • @gee3883
      @gee3883 Месяц назад

      @@JsJourney-nz7ci so its in UK waters?

  • @JoeyBlogs007
    @JoeyBlogs007 Месяц назад +12

    Sounds like an Adolf Putler plot. None of this makes sense. Why is this ship even sailing around with that much AN on it even ??? How can this even be allowed anywhere on Earth ??? 😡😡😡

    • @callumhaines6874
      @callumhaines6874 Месяц назад

      Adolf Putler actually wanted to be mates with the UK.

    • @63phillip
      @63phillip Месяц назад

      Ships with this much are traveling our oceans daily with no threat to anyone. Nuclear subs pose a greater threat if they blow up.

  • @muckle8
    @muckle8 Месяц назад +13

    It’s fertiliser to help britain grow vegetables - or don’t they need that now ? 🙄

    • @bw7228
      @bw7228 Месяц назад

      Not just vegetables 😉

    • @Mbabz1957
      @Mbabz1957 Месяц назад +1

      Except no one in th UK ordered it lol

    • @SneekyRafiki
      @SneekyRafiki Месяц назад

      A maltese ship carrying fertilizer is probably just that. I don't know the while story behind this ship however, the Maltese people would NEVER harm UK! It's nonsense imo

    • @muckle8
      @muckle8 Месяц назад

      The Uk milking it for every last drop of political leverage and anti- Russian propaganda. Pathetic way to carry on.

    • @MommaLousKitchen
      @MommaLousKitchen Месяц назад

      That was my question.

  • @mdcclxxviepluribusunum1066
    @mdcclxxviepluribusunum1066 Месяц назад +2

    Western civilians should be more worried about what their own governments are doing rather than what said governments feed you.

  • @OutOfWards
    @OutOfWards Месяц назад

    So is there a live feed of this thing?

  • @moleculemagician8616
    @moleculemagician8616 Месяц назад +38

    I wonder if Vladimir Putin has “Start a Nuclear War” on his bucket list?

    • @user-fl6ko9do5y
      @user-fl6ko9do5y Месяц назад +6

      no but it sounds like it was on Nato's

    • @leewilson2937
      @leewilson2937 Месяц назад +7

      nah its just on his facebook

    • @zulubeatz1
      @zulubeatz1 Месяц назад +2

      @@user-fl6ko9do5yHow ? By standing up to a bully ?

    • @hoppes9658
      @hoppes9658 Месяц назад +1

      Vladimir gave fair warning. Don’t get punchy on the border.

    • @moleculemagician8616
      @moleculemagician8616 Месяц назад +4

      @@hoppes9658 Let’s redraw the border so that Ukraine gets all of the land that it originally had, plus 1/2 of the land that Russia originally had ( Ukraine gets to choose which half).

  • @johngreen4610
    @johngreen4610 Месяц назад +8

    Times Radio I am disapointed in you. Why do you put people like this on. #1 he keeps saying 20,000 kilotons of explosive. he should be saying 20 kilotons or 20,000 tons. Also he keeps equating ammonium nitrate to TNT they are not equivalent in explosive power. Ammonium nitrate is about 40% equivalent to TNT.

    • @RobinSkoglund-g6k
      @RobinSkoglund-g6k Месяц назад

      and "nucular"

    • @edstar83
      @edstar83 Месяц назад

      In Soviet Russia, ammonium nitrate go Big B000oom!

  • @jasonlox27
    @jasonlox27 Месяц назад +11

    its called propaganda ffs

  • @JamesJones-zs6bu
    @JamesJones-zs6bu Месяц назад +1

    How was this allowed so near the uk. This should never have happened. Whoes to blame for this.

  • @ivanhelovanitch7444
    @ivanhelovanitch7444 Месяц назад +1

    If it goes off it might stop the boats

  • @andyleighton6969
    @andyleighton6969 Месяц назад +14

    Set of by "a firework"?
    It was a warehouse full!

    • @mrb.5610
      @mrb.5610 Месяц назад +2

      Seem to remember it was some idiot doing welding repairs on the storage silo.

    • @soylentgreenb
      @soylentgreenb Месяц назад +4

      In small amount it burns like a cigar. Even if you mix it with fuel oil it will just not detonate without a primer (think stick of dynamite); blasting cap won't work. But with tons to kilotons it becomes self-confining; it burns like a cigar, but there's no where for the heat to go but to heat the surrounding material, eventually it is burning fast enough that the pressure and heat can't escape fast enough it just runs away towards a full on detonation. The problem is just the amount; in a 50 kg bag it is a safe chemical that might at worst accelerate a fire.

    • @andrewbalfour7130
      @andrewbalfour7130 Месяц назад +1

      ​@soylentgreenb a fire broken out in the warehouse. Fireworks as well as the Ammonium Nitrate which had been sitting too long. It was removed from an old Russian ship that was not allowed to sail. The Ammonia was off loaded and apparently forgotten about.

    • @SA12String
      @SA12String Месяц назад

      @@mrb.5610 The blame of the welders is still pretty unreasonable. Lots of experts deny the welders were at fault. Who knows? The only people clearly to blame were the government at the time, who has resigned, and the port authority, who just ignored the problem until it essentially removed the port from existence in less than a second. Still, no one is being held responsible. Criminal charges against those most closely involved were dropped. Corruption is rampant in the government...ALL governments, everywhere.

    • @soylentgreenb
      @soylentgreenb Месяц назад

      @@andrewbalfour7130 It wasn't thousands of tonnes of fireworks that exploded. Nor was it ammonia. Nor were fireworks required to set off the ammonium nitrate detonation. It was thousands of tonnes of ammonium nitrate that detonated due to an uncontrolled fire. Nothing more than an uncontrolled fire is required to detonate ammonium nitrate if you have sufficient amounts in a pile and it's all on fire. It becomes self-confining.
      If you burn ammonium nitrate in kg amounts it will smoulder like a cigar. Nothing terrible will happen. It's the amount; what you know from bench scale doesn't transfer to thousands-of-tonnes scale.
      Flash powder is an excellent analogy on a small scale. A fraction of a gram loose flash will just go "FWWOOFF" with a bright flash. A few grams in a pile might detonate if it is a sufficiently good preparation and formula. Hundreds of grams *will* detonate. But if you confine it even poorly in a cardboard tube it now will detonate even in small quantities like hundreds of mg. This is the main reason people lose fingers messing with this stuff. What's safe in 100 mg amounts becomes drastically unsafe with 20 grams in a glass beaker.

  • @chrisclarke4541
    @chrisclarke4541 Месяц назад

    I have been to Belarus and Russia and i was struck by just how friendly and welcoming the people were. I don't ever wish to go to war with Russia or Belarus. Let's all work towards a peaceful solution to the conflict in Ukraine please God!!!!