Interesting clip from August 19, 1965 shows scenes from the Beatles press conference in Houston, Texas with commentary (recorded later) about the "Paul is Dead" controversy.
This interview was in 1965. We are probably looking at the original Paul. It was said on IF60 that when he was about fourteen, he ate some poorly cooked eggs, which gave him a serious stomach condition. He needed to take regular medication to control the infection. He was often sick, and could not appear for performances. This is when his cousins and other ringers began to understudy for him. Ringo also had an understudy. The entirety of Beatles "real" history is not well known. It is rumored, the "Faul" in 2017 is the "third" replacement Paul.
I was there. Amazing! It was the Weird Beard who introduced them. After the matinee was over I waited by stage hoping to get back stage. Mal Evans chose older girls to go back stage. I was too young and was bypassed. I let Mal have it. He walked over and patted me on top of the head and told me to come back in five years.
people bought so many records just to play them in reverse to hear secret words etc they wore the records out so they had to buy new ones and so made amazing sales....the beatles were very smart people.
Not only that, but out of the four of them, what are the odds that it was not the adorakable drummer or either of the tough guys, but Paul, the one who could really use a spooky conspiracy theory to spice up his image.
There's enough clues that , they placed in view of the Albums, on their covers, in the sleeve ,in the lyrics, the backwards messages. All these anomalies, pictures of PaulMcCartney and Faul. Their eyes. ,their teeth, their eyes, ears, etc...
EXACTLY, thank you!!!! Someone needs to tell these crazy conspiracy theorists that EVERYBODY'S ear contours, height, eye color, and facial structure completely changes; it's called common sense, DUHH!!
Have you guys checked out the beatles never existed(the way they were presented to us)? That opened the door for me. I also believe that Paul was probably a twin. Look at his birth, it kind of makes sense. They all had multiples and that is why they ALL changed and fluxed in height over the years. Why their ears, noses, and teeth looked different too. I still love Paul, but i don't think there was ever just one.
Paul never died lol just watch the music videos for Coming Up, Goodnight Tonight, Say Say Say, and Wonderful Christmas Time. They used both Pauls and threw it right in front of our faces this whole time.. There are other music videos, where they used both, Paul McCartney and Billy Shears, or whatever the hell he goes by. I mean, damn, London Town literally features the original Paul McCartney without his double. You can tell the differences by their hair, eyebrows, posture, and facial expressions. We got lied too BIG TIME.
A clue hidden in plain site is Paul's use of his left hand. In this news conf, you see Paul smoking with his left hand. On the Abbey road cover, Paul's holding a cigarette in his right hand as he walks across the road. The real Paul did everything lefty and played bass guitar esp well lefty. The Beatles couldn't continue touring cause Faul hadn't yet mastered playing bass guitar lefty. Even to this day, Faul still has to constantly look down at this hands while playing. His body posture playing guitar is completely different, he stopped bobbing his hand back and forth while singing, stopped smiling while on stage and changed his vocal range. Tis a shame but everyone forgot how really good the original Paul was on stage and how beautiful a voice he had. Faul could never match Paul and thus the Beatles became a sound stage band. No band worth its salt becomes a sounds stage band leaving the stage forever unless they're forced to hide something. If you search the web long enough, you can find Faul playing guitar right handed. ken
Paul is Definitely dead. At this writing, only R S is the only original Beatles alive. Any of John and Paul's childhood friends know the truth. They are not going to talk. People have died because of the truth..
The voice over said if you play Strawberry Fields Forever backwards you can hear John saying "I buried Paul". I'm not the only one, but its at the end of the song when it fades back in it sounds like John saying "I buried Paul" forwards. But John said he sang "cranberry sauce".
Yes it was supposed to be in late 1966 that allegedly he died. The audio that is heard on the tape was not being made the same time they filmed. These are other people that are talking on air ?about that video in the past tense and nothing is said by the actual Beatles that have any tie in to Paul's death. The only thing they are discussing in the video itself is how scared they are at concerts about getting trampled and Paul and John were especially concerned they would end up getting seriously hurt at a concert.
brian epstien, mal evens, jane ashers father. killed or committed suicide. that's a lot of weird deaths for people connected in some way to the beatles "crowd"
So weird: What happened to the KILT sign? Its shown above the Beatles from :00 to :11 then suddenly, the KILT sign disappears from :54 on.... Oooo Conspiracy? ;)
Can't anyone find the original tv and radio news alerts from Nov.1966 that interrupted all broadcasts to say Paul McCartney was killed in a car crash? My mom and my friends' moms heard it during the night and told us when we got up for school the next day. We didn't hear the corrected report until it came out almost 12 hours later.
I was only four and 66 so I wouldn’t know about the news reports and my parents weren’t Beatles fans so they wouldn’t either. But if the PID is true, which I think it is, do you think there’s any way that would be available on the Internet anymore? The way they censor everything from the top?? Nope.
Yeah. And also John, George and Ringo. Check out their 1964 pictures and the ones froms the 70's, they look so different... so logically they were dead and replaced... I'm sarcastic in case you didn't notice it.
If anybody had been replaced, just going by different looks, it would be John. He had lost a lot of weight due to his drug use. With the long hair and thinner face he had in the late sixties he looked totally different. John didn't bring in Yoko Ono. That was his replacement.
I thought even Paul said that all that crap started with the Abbey road album cover. He was walking across the street barefoot so somehow somebody thought that he was dead.
Hello Sheeple, keep your day job. They stop touring in 1966, Brian Epstein murdered 8 months later in 1967......after 1966, when paul did appear again, he appears playing guitar right-handed and is 2 inches taller. Man, most people really really need to keep their day job.
Even interviews with Paul Stanley as kiss with no makeup, before he got his teeth fixed. They match. His right eye and right eyebrow should be a dead giveaway
So many of the clues are like: If you flip the music video for "Let It Be" upside-down, invert it, and play "Magical Mystery Tour" backwards you'll see that Paul McCartney is in fact dead. Even with the more "serious" evidence, I can't believe it because of all the nuts in the PID group. I personally think it's a whole bunch of bologna. John, the most honest Beatle, shut it down plenty of times. There's just no substance from what I've seen and heard. The best evidence they have comparing a picture of "pre-death" Paul smiling and "post-death" Paul making that signature pouty face that we all know and love.
@ChildofNemesis14 Well I really like the Beatles and admire their influence and everything, but some people in the comments for these videos are treating them like gods XD Maybe it's me, but I think that it's strange to have such strong feelings for a band/actor/musician. Especially those from such a long time ago. I don't care about actors/musicians/artists personal lives either
I am from TeXas... and I still live here... and mister James Paul McCartney ain't -- I repeat -- *not* dead... an' I should know... I had "spotted" him at a local 7-11 convenient store, just the other night while gettin' my hangover meds. [ rolls eyes in sarcasm ] Geez, people... I mean, really... *if* he had died, his imposter must've have fooled a lot of people, including his wife, kids & the members of Wings [from the '70s].
@mickeyelsalsero It would be pretty damn impressive to find a person who looked exactly like paul, was left handed, could play guitar and sing and write music, and moved like him. considering that paul moves a certain way and acts a certain way I'd be impressed if they managed to find someone before anyone had noticed the accident itself. Cus no one ever reported the "car accident" they said paul was in o.o No police no nothing.
my favorite of all time was the always comparing canadian and nfl football and the top secret football game that was kept under wraps cfl edmonton against the saints the game no one knew about
Eyebulb I believe that he is alive but was replaced. He may have continued to sing on the tracks behind the scenes, but as far as being an actual Beatle, he was done! And the story has it that Billy Shears was already a musician in a band. And the absence of the Beatles after 66 was head scratching. This gives credence to the theory that that was the time in which they got Billy acclimated and a shit load of surgery. If u look at todays "Paul" you can tell quite CLEARLY that he has had plenty of Plastic surgery...
You're pretty spot on about most of this. Have been researching for over 2 years. No he did not die, but he was replaced for certain things. But he was still recording with The Beatles behind the scenes all the way up to 1970. You have to really look closely to tell because he used disguises too, heavy moustache and beard. But you can still tell it is Paul by eye color, ears, etc.
It's strange that after the purported Death of Paul, the music of the Beatles changed DRASTICALLY! Paul 1 could not play piano, was left HANDED, and didn't have the grasp of Musical Theory that "Billy Pepperpot," the man who was MOST likely to have replaced him did. Billy Shepherd aka Pepperpot was making his own albums and was quite talented in music and a wonderful piano player. I think that looking back, if the bubblegum "I Wanna Hold your Hand" Beatles had not changed so DRASTICALLY, it might be more difficult to believe that Paul's had died. THE BEATLES MIGHT ALSO HAVE LOST SOME OF THE POPULARITY THEY ORIGINALLY ENJOYED DUE TO THE RAPIDLY CHANGING MUSICAL STYLES COMING INTO FOCUS. The "new" Paul is significantly taller than the original. He has completely different ears, and ears are a sort of fingerprint. Look for yourself. When facial recognition software is overlaid upon the before and after pictures, it shows that the two could not be the same man. The fact is, AFTER THE CLEAR CHANGES in the music and in the way Paul himself LOOKED, it's not easy to deny that SOMETHING WAS VERY VERY DIFFERENT ABOUT "PAUL." CONSIDER THE many strange deaths following Paul's "DEATH" in a CAR ACCIDENT. The people who were a THREAT TO revealing what happened were ELIMINATED. The music industry is MADE to make MONEY. I am SURE THAT many of you believe that things like this could NEVER happen, but THINK ABOUT THE FACT THAT MANY Rich and powerful People would have lost UNTOLD SUMS of 💰 MONEY if the Beatles were to suddenly cease to EXIST. At the time, the technology allowed for an easier switch from Paul to ?Billy Pepperpot?? Today, we could use technology to PROVE that the two men were not one in the same. Funny, Paul 2 is the last Beatle standing. Maybe he was a little bit younger than Paul 1? CONSIDER... "He blew his mind out in a car, He didn't notice that the lights had changed." Hmmm.... interesting lyrics. People wake up!! The world had NEVER BEEN SO INTERESTED IN ANY BAND UNTIL THE "BRITISH INVASION," AND THOSE WHO PROFITED FROM THAT WEREN'T GOING TO END IT BECAUSE OF Paul's DEATH. Paul was LEFT HANDED. He was no super talented musical GENIUS, until he was replaced by a right handed man who could play piano, drums, guitar and Bass, all RIGHT HANDED. Wake up and smell the GREEDY music industry, which compared to then, is a MONSTROSITY that is in EXISTENCE NOT to produce MUSIC, BUT TO USE TECHNOLOGY to CREATE STARS of whomever they please. PLASTIC SURGERY AND AUTOTUNED CRAP ARE HALLMARKS OF TODAY'S ARTIFICIAL POP STARS. I personally prefer natural talent to the CRAP they call music today, I am a trained vocalist with perfect pitch, and I can't FIND music today that is free of Auto tuned garbage and computer editing, PEOPLE WITH ACTUAL TALENT ARE RARE, and the industry will do whatever it takes to make sure that the money rolls in. Music was VERY DIFFERENT in the 1960's and 1970's, and it required ACTUAL TALENT. SO MANY HUGE STARS CAME FROM THE U.K. BECAUSE THE U.K. HAS ALWAYS TAUGHT STUDENTS TO APPRECIATE THE ARTS, UNLIKE AMERICA, ESPECIALLY TODAY. The Government NO LONGER FUNDS SCHOOLS TO CREATE COMPETITIVE AND INTELLIGENT STUDENTS AND BY CHOPPING THE BUDGET, THE US GOVERNMENT has cut off the kids from the ABILITY to STUDY CULTURE and ARTS such as MUSIC (THEORY) CHORUS, OR INSTRUMENTAL MUSIC. HELL, ILLINOIS IS THE ONLY STATE THAT STILL REQUIRES PHYSICAL EDUCATION. This CLEARLY is DESTROYING the kids in US SCHOOLS today, and funny enough, many of them LOVE MUSIC FROM THE 90'S AND EARLIER BECAUSE EVEN THE UNTRAINED, to some degree, CAN TELL GARBAGE FROM REAL MUSIC. THE NEW PAUL IS BILLY "PEPPERPOT" SHEPHERD. CHECK IT OUT MORE CAREFULLY AND BE SKEPTICAL. MONEY MAKES THE WORLD TURN... And had the Beatles ceased to be, the world would have stopped turning.
Admirable passion, but, before getting to the bulk of ur presentation, an important question needs to be answered - why would the Beatles "suddenly cease to EXIST" if Paul McCartney had actually died in 1966?
The original Paul was both better looking, and had a more lyrical voice. Once you see, you can't unsee!! Faul is a very convincing and talented double, but not the same man.
I agree, once you see it, you can't unsee. It took me 48 years to finally see Paul was replaced. When you compare the photos, but more importantly, the videos. Watch A Hard Day's Night, Help! and Eight Days a Week, then watch Magical Mystery Tour, Let It Be and Wingspan and it is clear they are two different people. Paul had a small, round head and was shorter, a smaller man. Sir Faul is taller, has a thinner, longer face. They resemble each other, yes, but you can tell they are different once you can psychologically accept it, which was tough for me.
mysticmaverick1 I bet that it’s hard for lifelong fans of the Beatles to accept. I have been a fan since my childhood in the 80’s, and I was given old Beatles records to listen to, and they were all of the more “original “ early “bubble gum pop rock” Beatles, with Paul. I remember later thinking about how much different their music sounded, but didn’t know until my mother told me that there was a rumor that Paul had died, and was silently replaced by another man. It was not until the past year or two that I really started scouring their music, and I was able to HEAR the different men sing right after each other. At that point I could hear different vocal qualities between the two Pauls. I have also seen videos on height difference, parting the hair in a different natural direction, differences in their ear 👂 shape and the differences in their faces and head shape. The interesting thing is that Faul went to a great deal of trouble in covering his ears with longer hair, and it’s really common on several series of pictures. Then one Day, I ran into a face matching side by side analysis, and that was more than the cherry on top. It was irrefutable at that point. I thought, how crazy it was for anyone who has been lied to for life. I would have a hard time trying to accept such a shock TOO! But, it’s truly impossible to ignore the preponderance of the evidence, along with many strange things that.the Beatles said about Paul and things that Faul said. I love the music from both of them, and am sorry for the fans that don’t want to see the “obvious.” It would be Hard for anyone. My Condolences to you all.
It was extremely difficult for me, if not impossible for others, to psychologically process and accept that this happened. But I think it did. I watched A Hard Day's Night, Help!, Eight Days a Week, concert and video footage (up to 1966); then watched Magical Mystery Tour, Let It Be, and Wingspan (1967 on), and it is clear they are two different people. Video is even more convincing than the photos, which are easier to falsify with Photoshop.
@BarryDennen12 Hey you might be otyo somethimg there... what if we say something like "he pretended to die but pretended to be his own stunt double and then his pretended stunt double pretended to die but he didn't really die and now he's alive and really always was the same guy".... WOW what a conspiracy, I'll write a book on that, II think!!!
Paul did die....After extensive cosmetic surgery he was replaced . You may know his replacement by his stage name "The Hamburgler". Yes, previously famous as a McDonalds fast foot mascot he happily agreed to put down the burgers and become the new Paul McCartney.
@IwillKillYourCereal There are a lot of people like you. I'm usually like that with most celebrities, but there's just something about these four lads...I can't help but like them. Its inexplicable, really. But I get what you're talking about. Some people overdo it with the praise and admiration.
Let me help you set your track straight. This is Paul Stanley in 1965 he was the original Paul McCartney. I have studied scars, and Paul McCartney's top of his right arm over and over. The only difference is Paul Stanley's plastic surgery and his little Rose over that spot........ on your marks get set and go!!!!!! Don't believe me? Get all your pictures together
the people who believe that paul was replaced are just people who want attention, basically, they are sick. Paul: doesn’t like wearing shoes Fans: he’s dead.
This is all total bullshit..even by the pure shake... that Paul did die..in 66...... how would their managers.?? Get another Paul mccartney??. That could write songs with lennon???... the rest of the band?? . That sounded just like thee original mccartney???. N just go on like nothin happened??. Impossible.. way to much twilight zone bullshit...impossible...
Mark Cianfarani ...read Miles Mathis’ genealogy papers, just keep an open mind. paul was a product of the peerage. the peerage has been manipulating the populations for literally centuries.
why are people even so obsessed with this theory? if it were even true then yes, it would be heartbreaking, but "Faul" is still talented as far as I'm concerned. but still. the evidence that believers of the theory provide is generally so unconvincing. especially the height and face differences. it's called *maturing with age.*
You never notice John is consistently rough looking from 1967 onwards, although at least half the time before that he's often quite handsome and genuinely charming? Look up the 1964 Australia interview with just John, that's the real guy. Normal, funny, thoughtful. The other guy is doing a nasty impression of the real deal. He even has a longer face and nose and his voice is more nasally. All 4 Beatles had doubles though. Fab 4 = fabricated 4.
![Paul McCartney • Interview (Beatles’ Early Career) • 1964 [Reelin' In The Years Archive]](/img/1.gif)
When Paul dies, I'm gonna start telling people Paul is Alive.
That'll show em 👌✨
Lmfao yesss!!
Too funny!
PRINCESS DIANA
00:40 y'all talking about Paul but boi Ringo had me dying
Lol
Reporter: Ringo is dead
Giant ghost swath flies behind Ringo*
Ringo: I don't think I like where this is going 😰
If you really wanted to know, you would see proof that it is Billy Spears. Look in the right places. There is more than enough proof
Yesss 😂
THE DAMN TABLE IS FREAKING DANCING....
crrepppyy
Ringo knew he was gonna die. Just look at his paranoid reaction at 0:41 !
0:40 hahahahah Ringo watches the KILT poster falls down hahahahahahah
This interview was in 1965. We are probably looking at the original Paul. It was said on IF60 that when he was about fourteen, he ate some poorly cooked eggs, which gave him a serious stomach condition. He needed to take regular medication to control the infection. He was often sick, and could not appear for performances. This is when his cousins and other ringers began to understudy for him. Ringo also had an understudy. The entirety of Beatles "real" history is not well known. It is rumored, the "Faul" in 2017 is the "third" replacement Paul.
Now take your fuckin Meds!....you sad knobhead!...
@notthatbad4113y’all are psychopaths
I was there. Amazing! It was the Weird Beard who introduced them. After the matinee was over I waited by stage hoping to get back stage. Mal Evans chose older girls to go back stage. I was too young and was bypassed. I let Mal have it. He walked over and patted me on top of the head and told me to come back in five years.
And in five years the group disbanded.
0:40 LOL
I was at this press conference and it was awesome‼️~Y E A H Y E A H Y E A H~
people bought so many records just to play them in reverse to hear secret words etc they wore the records out so they had to buy new ones and so made amazing sales....the beatles were very smart people.
scott walker exactly. ive seen a few interviews and articles where they even admitted it was just a big marketing scheme.
Not only that, but out of the four of them, what are the odds that it was not the adorakable drummer or either of the tough guys, but Paul, the one who could really use a spooky conspiracy theory to spice up his image.
Well of course they’d say that... they’re IN on it...
There's enough clues that , they placed in view of the Albums, on their covers, in the sleeve ,in the lyrics, the backwards messages. All these anomalies, pictures of PaulMcCartney and Faul. Their eyes. ,their teeth, their eyes, ears, etc...
Paul isn't dead omg
EXACTLY, thank you!!!! Someone needs to tell these crazy conspiracy theorists that EVERYBODY'S ear contours, height, eye color, and facial structure completely changes; it's called common sense, DUHH!!
@Rain oh I know, right?????? These people are just blinded .
Exactly put pid believers won’t care and will bring up all the trash evidence every single time🥱 it’s quite tiring
@@breakfastsurreal5650 Go off girl!
Bro he is NOT dead I hate people that say he is
Have you guys checked out the beatles never existed(the way they were presented to us)? That opened the door for me. I also believe that Paul was probably a twin. Look at his birth, it kind of makes sense. They all had multiples and that is why they ALL changed and fluxed in height over the years. Why their ears, noses, and teeth looked different too. I still love Paul, but i don't think there was ever just one.
I believe there Is a whole Village full of Paul duplicates, because they are clones and they Need to be replaced every few years
@President P. Wilber Oinker Haha...that is funny.
I want one as a butler...haha
Paul never died lol just watch the music videos for Coming Up, Goodnight Tonight, Say Say Say, and Wonderful Christmas Time. They used both Pauls and threw it right in front of our faces this whole time.. There are other music videos, where they used both, Paul McCartney and Billy Shears, or whatever the hell he goes by. I mean, damn, London Town literally features the original Paul McCartney without his double. You can tell the differences by their hair, eyebrows, posture, and facial expressions. We got lied too BIG TIME.
@@batwings7027there is no double, for ANY OF THEM. y’all are brain dead to believe in any of these conspiracies. get help yall are sad
@notthatbad4113no
This is 1965 and Paul was supposed to die in 1966. So what are you guys Point???
NO point. ever.
he is not dead!
A clue hidden in plain site is Paul's use of his left hand. In this news conf, you see Paul smoking with his left hand. On the Abbey road cover, Paul's holding a cigarette in his right hand as he walks across the road. The real Paul did everything lefty and played bass guitar esp well lefty. The Beatles couldn't continue touring cause Faul hadn't yet mastered playing bass guitar lefty. Even to this day, Faul still has to constantly look down at this hands while playing. His body posture playing guitar is completely different, he stopped bobbing his hand back and forth while singing, stopped smiling while on stage and changed his vocal range. Tis a shame but everyone forgot how really good the original Paul was on stage and how beautiful a voice he had. Faul could never match Paul and thus the Beatles became a sound stage band. No band worth its salt becomes a sounds stage band leaving the stage forever unless they're forced to hide something. If you search the web long enough, you can find Faul playing guitar right handed.
ken
You're such a bullshitter. Not one thing you wrote is true.
Or maybe he had the cigarette in his right hand because the photo was being taken on his right
Oh looketh who smoketh with 'is right hand...
www.thebeatlesneverexisted.com/albp1a/rhp-32.jpg
Paul is Definitely dead. At this writing, only R S is the only original Beatles alive. Any of John and Paul's childhood friends know the truth. They are not going to talk. People have died because of the truth..
@@idfy2599he is NOT DEAD. what’s wrong with you people???
PAUL IS PAUL! ❤
MY GOD !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
IK!!!!!!
So was there princess 👸 and that bitch dead af 🤣 except they didn’t need her still around anymore
holy shit 5 bucks a ticket i wish it was like that now...
Bill replaced Paul .
Paul is dead,
and the Earth is flat...
ALL IN ONE DAY!
I HATE RUclips.
Paul is Dead.
@@kickbuttoski666 ...yeah... and the earth is flat.
@@luiszaeta2057 No it isn't flat.
@@joepeavy3936 of course it isn't flat; I'm just being sarcastic.
Paul did die .... he was replaced . Too many differences that can’t be ignored or denied . The new Paul grew on us and there you have it ...
Whoa never seen this footage!! Want to see the full film of that concert!
The voice over said if you play Strawberry Fields Forever backwards you can hear John saying "I buried Paul". I'm not the only one, but its at the end of the song when it fades back in it sounds like John saying "I buried Paul" forwards. But John said he sang "cranberry sauce".
i thought paul was supposed to have died in late 1966 but this is from 65 weird
gaz riley i was also a bit confused about this theory,
Paul's last appearance was in July 1965, European tour. In America he was already replaced by a double.
Yes it was supposed to be in late 1966 that allegedly he died. The audio that is heard on the tape was not being made the same time they filmed. These are other people that are talking on air ?about that video in the past tense and nothing is said by the actual Beatles that have any tie in to Paul's death. The only thing they are discussing in the video itself is how scared they are at concerts about getting trampled and Paul and John were especially concerned they would end up getting seriously hurt at a concert.
brian epstien, mal evens, jane ashers father. killed or committed suicide. that's a lot of weird deaths for people connected in some way to the beatles "crowd"
Some kind of cleanup operation. People who say Paul's alive are just helping cover up the death of Paul. They're not fans.
Jaems Harilie All the more reason to hide is if Paul was murdered and did not die in a car crash.
Wow I'm from Houston too.
Omg John is dead?
Of course John is dead.
Paul's last appearance was in July 1965, European tour. In America he was already replaced by a double.
Paul's last concert was Candlestick park imo.
paul is life !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Yes❤❤❤❤❤
@thebeatlescrazee The KILT sign fell right behind him (: I'd jump too lol
Thanks for posting!
Who 'KILT' Paul McCartney?
Paul die. Is easy to see differences. Pre 67 armony anf happiness in beatles. Post 67 all sadness.
@tunenito One of the guy's said it was Kilt Radio. Like a radio station.
So weird: What happened to the KILT sign? Its shown above the Beatles from :00 to :11 then suddenly, the KILT sign disappears from :54 on.... Oooo Conspiracy? ;)
paul can play left or right.
Can't anyone find the original tv and radio news alerts from Nov.1966 that interrupted all broadcasts to say Paul McCartney was killed in a car crash? My mom and my friends' moms heard it during the night and told us when we got up for school the next day. We didn't hear the corrected report until it came out almost 12 hours later.
I was only four and 66 so I wouldn’t know about the news reports and my parents weren’t Beatles fans so they wouldn’t either. But if the PID is true, which I think it is, do you think there’s any way that would be available on the Internet anymore? The way they censor everything from the top?? Nope.
paul is dead....there are more than clues...facial...voice...his ears....
You are correct.
Yeah. And also John, George and Ringo. Check out their 1964 pictures and the ones froms the 70's, they look so different... so logically they were dead and replaced... I'm sarcastic in case you didn't notice it.
@@luiszaeta2057 Thier looks did change.
Still does not change the fact that Paul was replaced by William.
@@thorpenator9148 yeah.. and the other 3 same thing... they were replaced too... based on the same evidences.
If anybody had been replaced, just going by different looks, it would be John. He had lost a lot of weight due to his drug use. With the long hair and thinner face he had in the late sixties he looked totally different. John didn't bring in Yoko Ono. That was his replacement.
I believe the major reason the Beatles stopped touring is the guy that replaced Paul could not play left handed.
0:40 something falls down just behind him...
...so he must be dead!...right?...
@MusicalGod9091 I know. Paul and Ringo were bestowed with immortality after George died. It is impossible for them to die, especially Paul.
Chloe Helton wtf? That ain’t possible. They will die eventually like everyone else. Even the most rich and famous can’t cheat death.
@@dmmice2344 liar
I thought even Paul said that all that crap started with the Abbey road album cover. He was walking across the street barefoot so somehow somebody thought that he was dead.
Paul looks very a live in the film see he's right there breathing and living n' stuff
When Paul was barefoot on Abbey Road, I think they were mocking the whole 'Paul is dead' thing.
Hello Sheeple, keep your day job. They stop touring in 1966, Brian Epstein murdered 8 months later in 1967......after 1966, when paul did appear again, he appears playing guitar right-handed and is 2 inches taller. Man, most people really really need to keep their day job.
brian epstein commited suicide ? i am wrong ? please send me an answer thanks best regards
@assault and battery oooo you're definitely going to convince people this conspiracy is true and you're not a nutter
Epstein died of an accidental drug overdose.
Lmao have you even personally measured paul's height before/after or, you just based though pictures? How convenient.
Paul is dead..not even going to give a courtesy opinion to that crazy theory...ooops, too late
Fili Buster no he's not
He is Not-! Dead
False interview, the narrators superimposed an audio that did not belong to that video, that is why they did not flinch or answer anything about it.
Best secret backwards message on an Lp is on one of "Girlschool" 's ...." Don't do that mate you'll ruin the needle" ( -Stylus)
@thebeatles962 that's an interesting term.That describes them well! I'm a long time Beatles fan.
John was changing his habit everyyear
thats not from 1965
I am the real Paul. We swapped in Houston and I retired a truck driver .
Even interviews with Paul Stanley as kiss with no makeup, before he got his teeth fixed. They match. His right eye and right eyebrow should be a dead giveaway
Interesting Maskerade point!
Saying Paul is dead, is dead. Give it a rest.
The people commenting on this are either hard core Beatles fans or are watching this because they think they're sexy. I feel like such an outcast :(
So many of the clues are like: If you flip the music video for "Let It Be" upside-down, invert it, and play "Magical Mystery Tour" backwards you'll see that Paul McCartney is in fact dead. Even with the more "serious" evidence, I can't believe it because of all the nuts in the PID group. I personally think it's a whole bunch of bologna. John, the most honest Beatle, shut it down plenty of times. There's just no substance from what I've seen and heard. The best evidence they have comparing a picture of "pre-death" Paul smiling and "post-death" Paul making that signature pouty face that we all know and love.
Cranberry sauce.
omg i live in houstin :O
the footage is...the people talking isn't. simple.
Who are the people talking? What broadcast is this from?
@ChildofNemesis14 Well I really like the Beatles and admire their influence and everything, but some people in the comments for these videos are treating them like gods XD Maybe it's me, but I think that it's strange to have such strong feelings for a band/actor/musician. Especially those from such a long time ago. I don't care about actors/musicians/artists personal lives either
it's dubbed
I love me a freckled Paulllllll!!!! Yumm!!
lennon is dead !!!
Małgosia C. :: GEORGE TOO!
PAT Appleton :: With JFK!!
Paul dead... Please believe.... What about the living Paul?
Pauls son James, born 1977, is the spitting image of Paul ala 1963, especially the eyes. Explain that. End of myth. Mats, Sweden.
I am from TeXas... and I still live here... and mister James Paul McCartney ain't -- I repeat -- *not* dead... an' I should know... I had "spotted" him at a local 7-11 convenient store, just the other night while gettin' my hangover meds.
[ rolls eyes in sarcasm ]
Geez, people... I mean, really... *if* he had died, his imposter must've have fooled a lot of people, including his wife, kids & the members of Wings [from the '70s].
You see princess Diana with him to😇
@BarryDennen12 Paul never dies.
I wont comment re: Paul is dead, but I will say he does seem different starting around 1967. Just something not quite the same.
A lot of it is his attitude. I can see the looks,too, but he just acts more arrogant and talky than the original Paul
@JoseMari41 The people must've been talking after Strawberry Fields
@mickeyelsalsero It would be pretty damn impressive to find a person who looked exactly like paul, was left handed, could play guitar and sing and write music, and moved like him. considering that paul moves a certain way and acts a certain way I'd be impressed if they managed to find someone before anyone had noticed the accident itself. Cus no one ever reported the "car accident" they said paul was in o.o No police no nothing.
my favorite of all time was the always comparing canadian and nfl football and the top secret football game that was kept under wraps cfl edmonton against the saints the game no one knew about
Eyebulb I believe that he is alive but was replaced. He may have continued to sing on the tracks behind the scenes, but as far as being an actual Beatle, he was done! And the story has it that Billy Shears was already a musician in a band. And the absence of the Beatles after 66 was head scratching. This gives credence to the theory that that was the time in which they got Billy acclimated and a shit load of surgery. If u look at todays "Paul" you can tell quite CLEARLY that he has had plenty of Plastic surgery...
You're pretty spot on about most of this. Have been researching for over 2 years. No he did not die, but he was replaced for certain things. But he was still recording with The Beatles behind the scenes all the way up to 1970. You have to really look closely to tell because he used disguises too, heavy moustache and beard. But you can still tell it is Paul by eye color, ears, etc.
Paul nunca existió, todo fue una ilusión. Siempre fue Ringo disfrazado. O.o
@georgiee25931 and john doesnt have glasses!
I'm still baffled why anyone would want to see Ringo
??
2 Paul es muy dificil con tanto talento la verdad es que sean solo uno y esto sea tansolo un invento promosional
Nothing to do to save his life. Call his wife in. He blew his mind out in a car
@@concorde2569 It rhymed and sounded good. So John ran with it.
@thebeatles962 no,he was very...
George Harrison is dead
but is he? cant believe anything anymore
craggy rock George died back in 2001, dumbass.
It's strange that after the purported Death of Paul, the music of the Beatles changed DRASTICALLY!
Paul 1 could not play piano, was left HANDED, and didn't have the grasp of Musical Theory that "Billy Pepperpot," the man who was MOST likely to have replaced him did. Billy Shepherd aka Pepperpot was making his own albums and was quite talented in music and a wonderful piano player. I think that looking back, if the bubblegum "I Wanna Hold your Hand" Beatles had not changed so DRASTICALLY, it might be more difficult to believe that Paul's had died. THE BEATLES MIGHT ALSO HAVE LOST SOME OF THE POPULARITY THEY ORIGINALLY ENJOYED DUE TO THE RAPIDLY CHANGING MUSICAL STYLES COMING INTO FOCUS.
The "new" Paul is significantly taller than the original. He has completely different ears, and ears are a sort of fingerprint. Look for yourself. When facial recognition software is overlaid upon the before and after pictures, it shows that the two could not be the same man. The fact is, AFTER THE CLEAR CHANGES in the music and in the way Paul himself LOOKED, it's not easy to deny that SOMETHING WAS VERY VERY DIFFERENT ABOUT "PAUL."
CONSIDER THE many strange deaths following Paul's "DEATH" in a CAR ACCIDENT. The people who were a THREAT TO revealing what happened were ELIMINATED.
The music industry is MADE to make MONEY. I am SURE THAT many of you believe that things like this could NEVER happen, but THINK ABOUT THE FACT THAT MANY Rich and powerful People would have lost UNTOLD SUMS of 💰 MONEY if the Beatles were to suddenly cease to EXIST.
At the time, the technology allowed for an easier switch from Paul to ?Billy Pepperpot?? Today, we could use technology to PROVE that the two men were not one in the same. Funny, Paul 2 is the last Beatle standing. Maybe he was a little bit younger than Paul 1?
CONSIDER...
"He blew his mind out in a car, He didn't notice that the lights had changed." Hmmm.... interesting lyrics. People wake up!! The world had NEVER BEEN SO INTERESTED IN ANY BAND UNTIL THE "BRITISH INVASION," AND THOSE WHO PROFITED FROM THAT WEREN'T GOING TO END IT BECAUSE OF Paul's DEATH.
Paul was LEFT HANDED. He was no super talented musical GENIUS, until he was replaced by a right handed man who could play piano, drums, guitar and Bass, all RIGHT HANDED. Wake up and smell the GREEDY music industry, which compared to then, is a MONSTROSITY that is in EXISTENCE NOT to produce MUSIC, BUT TO USE TECHNOLOGY to CREATE STARS of whomever they please. PLASTIC SURGERY AND AUTOTUNED CRAP ARE HALLMARKS OF TODAY'S ARTIFICIAL POP STARS.
I personally prefer natural talent to the CRAP they call music today, I am a trained vocalist with perfect pitch, and I can't FIND music today that is free of Auto tuned garbage and computer editing, PEOPLE WITH ACTUAL TALENT ARE RARE, and the industry will do whatever it takes to make sure that the money rolls in.
Music was VERY DIFFERENT in the 1960's and 1970's, and it required ACTUAL TALENT. SO MANY HUGE STARS CAME FROM THE U.K. BECAUSE THE U.K. HAS ALWAYS TAUGHT STUDENTS TO APPRECIATE THE ARTS, UNLIKE AMERICA, ESPECIALLY TODAY. The Government NO LONGER FUNDS SCHOOLS TO CREATE COMPETITIVE AND INTELLIGENT STUDENTS AND BY CHOPPING THE BUDGET, THE US GOVERNMENT has cut off the kids from the ABILITY to STUDY CULTURE and ARTS such as MUSIC (THEORY) CHORUS, OR INSTRUMENTAL MUSIC.
HELL, ILLINOIS IS THE ONLY STATE THAT STILL REQUIRES PHYSICAL EDUCATION.
This CLEARLY is DESTROYING the kids in US SCHOOLS today, and funny enough, many of them LOVE MUSIC FROM THE 90'S AND EARLIER BECAUSE EVEN THE UNTRAINED, to some degree, CAN TELL GARBAGE FROM REAL MUSIC.
THE NEW PAUL IS BILLY "PEPPERPOT" SHEPHERD. CHECK IT OUT MORE CAREFULLY AND BE SKEPTICAL. MONEY MAKES THE WORLD TURN... And had the Beatles ceased to be, the world would have stopped turning.
Admirable passion, but, before getting to the bulk of ur presentation, an important question needs to be answered - why would the Beatles "suddenly cease to EXIST" if Paul McCartney had actually died in 1966?
The original Paul was both better looking, and had a more lyrical voice. Once you see, you can't unsee!! Faul is a very convincing and talented double, but not the same man.
I agree, once you see it, you can't unsee. It took me 48 years to finally see Paul was replaced. When you compare the photos, but more importantly, the videos. Watch A Hard Day's Night, Help! and Eight Days a Week, then watch Magical Mystery Tour, Let It Be and Wingspan and it is clear they are two different people. Paul had a small, round head and was shorter, a smaller man. Sir Faul is taller, has a thinner, longer face. They resemble each other, yes, but you can tell they are different once you can psychologically accept it, which was tough for me.
mysticmaverick1 I bet that it’s hard for lifelong fans of the Beatles to accept. I have been a fan since my childhood in the 80’s, and I was given old Beatles records to listen to, and they were all of the more “original “ early “bubble gum pop rock” Beatles, with Paul. I remember later thinking about how much different their music sounded, but didn’t know until my mother told me that there was a rumor that Paul had died, and was silently replaced by another man. It was not until the past year or two that I really started scouring their music, and I was able to HEAR the different men sing right after each other. At that point I could hear different vocal qualities between the two Pauls. I have also seen videos on height difference, parting the hair in a different natural direction, differences in their ear 👂 shape and the differences in their faces and head shape. The interesting thing is that Faul went to a great deal of trouble in covering his ears with longer hair, and it’s really common on several series of pictures. Then one Day, I ran into a face matching side by side analysis, and that was more than the cherry on top. It was irrefutable at that point. I thought, how crazy it was for anyone who has been lied to for life. I would have a hard time trying to accept such a shock TOO! But, it’s truly impossible to ignore the preponderance of the evidence, along with many strange things that.the Beatles said about Paul and things that Faul said. I love the music from both of them, and am sorry for the fans that don’t want to see the “obvious.” It would be Hard for anyone. My Condolences to you all.
It was extremely difficult for me, if not impossible for others, to psychologically process and accept that this happened. But I think it did. I watched A Hard Day's Night, Help!, Eight Days a Week, concert and video footage (up to 1966); then watched Magical Mystery Tour, Let It Be, and Wingspan (1967 on), and it is clear they are two different people. Video is even more convincing than the photos, which are easier to falsify with Photoshop.
why is youtube pushing paul mccartney is dead conspiracies onto me???? i dont even listen to the beatles
@BarryDennen12 HA! HA! HA! HA! HA!!!! GOOD ONE! I hope Paul NEVER DIES!
@BarryDennen12 Hey you might be otyo somethimg there... what if we say something like "he pretended to die but pretended to be his own stunt double and then his pretended stunt double pretended to die but he didn't really die and now he's alive and really always was the same guy".... WOW what a conspiracy, I'll write a book on that, II think!!!
Read The Life and Death of Paul McCartney 1942-1966 by Nicholas Kollerstrom
Your welcome
Damn h town
@byrdsmaniac That's pretty amazing .... KILT .... lol !!
By
Paul did die....After extensive cosmetic surgery he was replaced . You may know his replacement by his stage name "The Hamburgler". Yes, previously famous as a McDonalds fast foot mascot he happily agreed to put down the burgers and become the new Paul McCartney.
So sad.....November 22, 1963.....Paul was shot in that motorcade......oh wait....that was someone else.....never mind.
@IwillKillYourCereal There are a lot of people like you. I'm usually like that with most celebrities, but there's just something about these four lads...I can't help but like them. Its inexplicable, really. But I get what you're talking about. Some people overdo it with the praise and admiration.
Let me help you set your track straight. This is Paul Stanley in 1965 he was the original Paul McCartney. I have studied scars, and Paul McCartney's top of his right arm over and over. The only difference is Paul Stanley's plastic surgery and his little Rose over that spot........ on your marks get set and go!!!!!! Don't believe me? Get all your pictures together
You're on the wrong track lady
I miss Paul but faul is good too... it was a great plan to sell records that you get to play forwards and backwards!
@georgiee25931 Haha nice names, right?
SURE THE PEOPLE ARE GOING TO SEE THE FEATLES CAUSE THERE WAS NOTHING ELSE TO DO,,,LOL
Jajajaja
feca, grasa con manteca
Bullshit ....whats this ..nothing to do .hes alive reatarfs
the people who believe that paul was replaced are just people who want attention, basically, they are sick.
Paul: doesn’t like wearing shoes
Fans: he’s dead.
@notThatBad411 mucho texto
@notThatBad411 bro people grow up and change phisically
@notThatBad411 Zzzz
@notThatBad411 Yeah bro now go eat some chips
@notThatBad411 the fiction are the proofs
Actually the other 3 died in 1966 and Paul was the only one to survive. (I'm just kidding.)
This is all total bullshit..even by the pure shake... that Paul did die..in 66...... how would their managers.?? Get another Paul mccartney??. That could write songs with lennon???... the rest of the band?? . That sounded just like thee original mccartney???. N just go on like nothin happened??. Impossible.. way to much twilight zone bullshit...impossible...
Mark Cianfarani ...read Miles Mathis’ genealogy papers, just keep an open mind. paul was a product of the peerage. the peerage has been manipulating the populations for literally centuries.
why are people even so obsessed with this theory? if it were even true then yes, it would be heartbreaking, but "Faul" is still talented as far as I'm concerned. but still. the evidence that believers of the theory provide is generally so unconvincing. especially the height and face differences. it's called *maturing with age.*
Fake John and fake Paul.
sloppyjimboxiuxiu Are you crazy? Fake John? Omg.... '-'
You never notice John is consistently rough looking from 1967 onwards, although at least half the time before that he's often quite handsome and genuinely charming? Look up the 1964 Australia interview with just John, that's the real guy. Normal, funny, thoughtful. The other guy is doing a nasty impression of the real deal. He even has a longer face and nose and his voice is more nasally. All 4 Beatles had doubles though. Fab 4 = fabricated 4.
I don't care..Imo..they sucked anyway...