Different lens filters might help, to slightly blur the video, and then try to use different lighting. I'm seeing that fast lenses do not look good for cinematic look, because it's not natural to have the background heavily blurred. The whole point of 24p is to have the background blur when there is motion, and then to come back into focus when there is no movement, which is how our eye naturally sees things. Fast lenses with large apertures ruin people's footage, because the objects in the foreground that are in focus jump out too strong, and are too sharp, and it doesn't look cinematic. Try a small higher aperture setting than you would, so the background is in focus, and try a little less focus on the subject.
Thank you Mathieu! Finally, a balanced comparison with real world examples. I particularly appreciate your willingness to go through all of the mode settings and do the color grading examples. Really nice work!
14:08 - the panning difference here is quite striking. The Z6 sample looks much more eye-natural; whereas the A7iii feels more like that pan-blur that I've always hated about the longtime 24fps standard of the movie industry (though the origin of the A7iii's jittery pan here is probably more complicated than just shutter time or fps).
I seriously do not understand why people care about iso higher than 3200 or ok 6400. Do u ever shoot with this high ISO? I do not. 45% higher bitrate and external 10bit and raw recording is way more stronger advantage on the Nikon side. So Sony a7iii is an outsider in this comparison. Focus works almost the same after latest firmware updates+ a bit better ibis. I seriously don't understand people who are considering Sony a7iii now. The only valuable argument towards Sony for me if a person is already addicted to Sony system, has plenty of lenses, accessories and works more with photography. Otherwise Nikon z6 is an absolute winner.
Why? On DXOMark sensor ratings, both cameras receive the same score with the A7iii only getting around 1/3 of a stop better high ISO performance. If I were buying today, I’d definitely choose the Z6 for the handling, simpler menus and better price, since you can buy a new Z6 with 24-70 f4 for the price of a new A7iii body only. That’s a no brainer.
WOW. This further confirms my decision to purchase a Nikon Z6ii. The Z6ii might have the best firmware settings of anything in its class. This has not been talked about enough on reviews! Thank you so much for showing the firmware settings! The ability to slow the focus speed down, is critical for natural looking footage.
The z lens are so smooth on transitioning I’m so in love with it I have both Sony and Nikon z6 and with the z lens the Sony can’t keep up with it now I added atomos ninja v to my z6
Picture Profiles on Nikon is much more powerful than you think ... You can creat and install on camera what ever picrure profile you want... The posilities are endless. I don't use them much but there are times that are very usefull when you have to deliver pirctures on the spot and the is no time for editing ... Check Picture control utility 2 by nikon.
Nice thorough review. But I feel the coverage on log formats was inconsistent with my, and widely reported, experience. Log codecs effectively only use around half the numerical range for coding luminosity, meaning that they record less information. Granted, they compress the range of real world brightness by taking a log value thereof, but while this gives reach at the extremes, it does not mean more information. It actually means less. Hence that dogged "banding" issue in so much graded log footage. In practice, as implemented, the brightness simply never spans more than ~50% of the available range. I've done plenty of controlled tests, and shot numerous projects using log footage, and found that grading it to a pleasing end result is extremely hit-or-miss. Yours here is some of the least messed-up graded log footage I've seen, but I note it was of scrub vegetation in bright sunlight. Actors on a dark stage would be another thing. Sony's hybrid log option (e.g., PP10 on the A7iii), which you skipped over with only a name-only mention, goes a fair distance to fixing that. But even so, I've even given up on even hybrid log, and moved to straight up linear formats for recording.
Great review. I have possiblity to buy new Nikon Z6 body for 1230 eur. But still thinking about the A7 iii because better Eye AF, which i can get for 1500 €. Would you rather choose Z6 or A7 iii ? Is there big difference between Z6 Eye AF and A73's? I have now Nikon D90. Thank you.
I find the Sony Eye AF better overall, but Nikon has made various improvements via firmware so it's not too far behind. Also consider the lenses. Right now there is more choice of native lenses with Sony, for every budget needs, unless you'd consider adapting Nikkor F lenses on the Z6.
Cool video and I've leaned a lot watching this video, specially as a beginner. I'm planning on getting a nice camera. If possible could you do a review of the Nikon Z6 vs the Fuji XT4? Between the Nikon Z6 or Fuji XT4 I might go with. I was thinking of the Sony A7iii to. Peace and love
I was expecting to see a test where Z6 4:2:2 would matter. Did not see any graduated colour changes. Also highlight recovery of 10bit vs 8bit would have been nice (shoot flat & to the right). I have seen a more detailed video on eye-AF, which looks to me to be more useful for portraits then general video. What I like about the Z6 was touchscreen AF, that's generally useful. Sony had very fast AF, and looks better at motion tracking. I kept noticing Sony colour science was on the orange side, and Nikon on the red. I like red more than orange. However human eye is more discerning with luminance than chrominance, which suggests the high ISO low noise performance of the Sony is more important. For video these cameras are very close. I still want to see some 10bit vs 8bit tests like I mentioned first.
Young Freddy Mercury really knows what he's doing here. Great stuff. I'm a Nikon fan myself and as soon as mine dies (around 2040) I will make the leap to the Z.
I've been Nikon all my life. Looking to move from 35mm film to one of these. I'm liking the Nikon in many areas but I've got to say I'm hesitant to stick with Nikon due to the slow autofocus. I've seen it on other videos too. The Sony just smashes the competition out the water with the speed of the face and eye tracking. Seriously thinking about trading all the film cameras and 10 or so Nikon f lenses in and moving over to Sony. What do people think?
I've been impatiently waiting for some news to come from Sony and Nikon as far as replacements to the Z6 or A7iii. I'm ready to buy, but I'm struggling with which to buy. I'm even seriously considering the a6600. Sony got my attention with it's eye AF, and I was leaning Sony, but NOW Nikon just released a firmware that improves the AF. I'm still stuck trying to decide.
@@ElGuapo915 thanks for the update. Didn't hear about the firmware update. Thst makes me sway back to Nikon. Be easier as ive got the lenses. I'll also check out that other camera you mentioned. Thanks
Both are strong cameras for sure. It seems if you want you camera to more closely mimic the fully auto settings of your cell phone camera, the Sony has the edge, especially in the color and HDR department. But I think very few people would buy either camera for their ability to be mostly automatic in operation, or to actually "print" those 'in camera' color choices. This would totally defeat the purpose of editing in post where you have vastly more perspective and control over the image. It would be extremely difficult to make those kind of color decisions under the pressure of real world filming, without a high Rez onsite monitor, The Nikon seems to be clearly aimed at the cinematographer/filmmaker with higher quality output via HDMI and flatter profiles intended for editing after the fact. This is especially true if your shooting in HD where the image/detail of the Nikon is clearly better overall. The Nikon's 10bit output in 4k is the clear winner here for any serious film work. Once that changes to RAW output here in the near future, there will be no further comparison. Both cameras use very similar sensors so it really is the total package/details/ handling that tips the scales.
Hi Mathieu, would you say that the A7iii with its 8bit S-Log profiles bears about the same dynamic range and color grade abiility as the Z6 with tis external log and 10bit?
Now that it has been proven that Nikon has the best build quality and weather protection of all mirrorless cameras in the market today, the choice is easy. Thanks, good review.
@@Skill_Issue92 Yes, they are very fine cameras but even bigger than DSLR. Hardly the mirrorless revolution we've all been waiting for. Nikon Z6/Z7 are a much better compromise between compact size and ergonomics than either Sony's A7 series or Panasonic S series.
It’s important to mention the lenses used. Going with Nikon has a huge advantage is the ability to use a ton of different lenses, most of whom have really excellent color. Using the sigma art lenses might make for a more neutral comparison, but it hobbles a lot of the Nikon’s advantages.
You can use a lot of different lenses with the Sony too. Plus let's be honest, if I had used Nikon lenses, I'm sure somebody else would have found something to say about that. Take this tests as they are: they show you the main differences you need to know. From there, you choose the one you like best and the rest of the work is up to you ;-)
In to low ISO test I just see less noise on Sony but with washed image quality and colors, like when you crank up the noise reduction levels. Nikon shows more fine detail, maybe that´s why more noise is visible. Nikon has more vibrant amazing colors to me.
@@MathieuGasquetMirrorLessons Those river shots look very similar to Heidelberg Germany. Great comparison - I purchased the Z6 about 3-months ago, and I love it! Coming from a D4.
one thing I like about the z6 compared to the gh5 is the highlight rolloff is much nicer. It looks like the sony's rolloff is not quite as elegant as the z6 (this is a big issue for me as a real estate photographer, might not be for others!)
This is one of biggest today in infancy digital camera problem. How can we work with such immature products ? It's the easy & economical workflow winning, but products still sucks highlights like hell.
The Z6ii has more contrast and looks cooler in video temperature, and is much harder on the pale skin tone. The A7iii seems to have a more cinematic look, with less contrast in most of the default video settings. But the A7iii looks terrible when panning, the whole image looks jiddery and wallowing, where as the Z6iii looks rock solid.
I have a question, towards the end of the this video, about 80% in, 17:33 you talk about setting the speed of the transition from one focus point to another for video on the touch screen of Z6. Where do you do this in the menu on the Z6? I looked but could not see where in the Movie Menu on the Z6 What would be the settings? This would be very cool for video, Rack focus, by touch screen! Please!
me too. I like video from sony much more than z6 but the stability in z6 is a lot better than A7 iii. However low light video from sony is still the king. Maybe staying with Sony for a little bit longer to see if sony implement 4k60 at higher bitrate and improve its IBIS
Yeah as far as I can tell they used an average Nikon lens up against a significantly sharper more expensive Zeiss Sony lens. Not entirely sure the test is fair.
I think still sony has better image video if you doing some job, watch gerald undone when he compared to s1 still sony has better color accuracy. And if you say sony image flat, just change the contrast. But if u use for still, nikon has better color in skin tones
Is there a brand with a worse ergonomics and after-sale service than Sony ? Camera performances are nothing compared to ease of use and reliability. That's why I sold my A7RIII after 4 month (and 3 break down), despite my awesome 55 F/1.8 Zeiss lens. But it seems that the 50 F/1.8 Z Nikon is about as good. So, this Nikon could be my next buy.
I prefer the Z6 over the a7iii. I own both cameras plus many more brands and the honest truth the NIKON is much better. Only someone who had all invested into Sony and or never picked up another brand will defend it at all cost.
i have z6 i want to shoot video in nlog but i havent ninja v .... i want to shoot in nlog f6 pro moniter or not tell me some trips ....i cannot undestand what can i do ...plz help me ...
8:02 what's with the color shift in couch and curtains in this side-by-side (also seen in log comparison later)? Based on your log profile color correction a minute later it seems the Nikon is less faithfully reproducing shadow colors?
At 8:02 I'm using the Flat profile on the Z6 and PP10 on the A7 III, without any correction in post. So the difference in the shadow areas is just the difference between the two cameras in terms of colour reproduction, with the Sony having more red/magenta and the Nikon more green.
I was going to post a troll comment saying that this is a 4K comparison uploaded in 1080p. Then I realised this was I was a fucking idiot because it was upped in 4k. FML
What you are really buying into is the ecosystem, aka mount. The comparison is not even close when this is taken into account. Sony has a plethora of lenses whereas Nikon is getting lost in their own pointless apsc camera rather than making sure the Z cameras are getting a sensible lense selection.
Very similar performance. I prefer the ergonomics of the Z6 tho. Plus I prefer the rear screen and evf on the Z6.
Awesome test! Love my Z6 and I also shoot with Sony's every now and then!
sony for video hehe
Witch one makes beter videos?
Z6 all the way I have both Sony and Nikon Nikon is better with the z lens the autofocus is so smooth on the z6
Thanks so much for doing this. I've struggled to get the results I wanted when shooting video with the Z6. This gives me some directions to try.
Different lens filters might help, to slightly blur the video, and then try to use different lighting. I'm seeing that fast lenses do not look good for cinematic look, because it's not natural to have the background heavily blurred. The whole point of 24p is to have the background blur when there is motion, and then to come back into focus when there is no movement, which is how our eye naturally sees things. Fast lenses with large apertures ruin people's footage, because the objects in the foreground that are in focus jump out too strong, and are too sharp, and it doesn't look cinematic. Try a small higher aperture setting than you would, so the background is in focus, and try a little less focus on the subject.
Thank you Mathieu! Finally, a balanced comparison with real world examples. I particularly appreciate your willingness to go through all of the mode settings and do the color grading examples. Really nice work!
Thank you!
Thank you so much for this comparison! So glad you included the autofocus tests as I film myself a lot
14:08 - the panning difference here is quite striking. The Z6 sample looks much more eye-natural; whereas the A7iii feels more like that pan-blur that I've always hated about the longtime 24fps standard of the movie industry (though the origin of the A7iii's jittery pan here is probably more complicated than just shutter time or fps).
Fantastic comparison, very similar, I'm quite happy with the Z6, but envious of the A7iii ISO performance.
I seriously do not understand why people care about iso higher than 3200 or ok 6400. Do u ever shoot with this high ISO? I do not. 45% higher bitrate and external 10bit and raw recording is way more stronger advantage on the Nikon side. So Sony a7iii is an outsider in this comparison. Focus works almost the same after latest firmware updates+ a bit better ibis. I seriously don't understand people who are considering Sony a7iii now. The only valuable argument towards Sony for me if a person is already addicted to Sony system, has plenty of lenses, accessories and works more with photography. Otherwise Nikon z6 is an absolute winner.
Why? On DXOMark sensor ratings, both cameras receive the same score with the A7iii only getting around 1/3 of a stop better high ISO performance. If I were buying today, I’d definitely choose the Z6 for the handling, simpler menus and better price, since you can buy a new Z6 with 24-70 f4 for the price of a new A7iii body only. That’s a no brainer.
Great video!!! Can’t wait to see what you produce on the Z5! Would you love to see low light comparison between Z5 and z6.
Thanks. I'll keep your suggestion in mind ;-)
WOW. This further confirms my decision to purchase a Nikon Z6ii. The Z6ii might have the best firmware settings of anything in its class. This has not been talked about enough on reviews! Thank you so much for showing the firmware settings! The ability to slow the focus speed down, is critical for natural looking footage.
One of the best review on you tube about z6 superb thanks
thanks!
These are so similar, that if they were not side by side in a split screen, 99% of the people wouldn't be able to tell a difference.
@michael p Z6 looks way better to me...what do you think?
@@naomishindou7197 slow mo is def better on a7
Exceptional comparison, thanks! Trying to decide between the A7Riii and the Z6ii (Primarily for stills). This helped!
Congratulations on your video. He is the most honest I've seen
thanks!
I vote for Z6, love that body and new lenses without focus breathing, fast and noiceless focusing. Top 👌
The z lens are so smooth on transitioning I’m so in love with it I have both Sony and Nikon z6 and with the z lens the Sony can’t keep up with it now I added atomos ninja v to my z6
To my eyes, Z6 color, sharpness, contrast, detail are much better than A73. Actually, I like Z6 better pretty much in all aspects you compared.
Same here.
great video bro thank you thinking about getting the nikon z6 myself....
Picture Profiles on Nikon is much more powerful than you think ... You can creat and install on camera what ever picrure profile you want... The posilities are endless. I don't use them much but there are times that are very usefull when you have to deliver pirctures on the spot and the is no time for editing ... Check Picture control utility 2 by nikon.
Wow ! Detailed features comparison .Thumbs up for your efforts.
Nice thorough review. But I feel the coverage on log formats was inconsistent with my, and widely reported, experience. Log codecs effectively only use around half the numerical range for coding luminosity, meaning that they record less information. Granted, they compress the range of real world brightness by taking a log value thereof, but while this gives reach at the extremes, it does not mean more information. It actually means less. Hence that dogged "banding" issue in so much graded log footage. In practice, as implemented, the brightness simply never spans more than ~50% of the available range. I've done plenty of controlled tests, and shot numerous projects using log footage, and found that grading it to a pleasing end result is extremely hit-or-miss. Yours here is some of the least messed-up graded log footage I've seen, but I note it was of scrub vegetation in bright sunlight. Actors on a dark stage would be another thing. Sony's hybrid log option (e.g., PP10 on the A7iii), which you skipped over with only a name-only mention, goes a fair distance to fixing that. But even so, I've even given up on even hybrid log, and moved to straight up linear formats for recording.
Nikon D90 User here. Thanks for your comparison. 1 subs from me
Excellent and very impartial review of both cameras.
Great review. I have possiblity to buy new Nikon Z6 body for 1230 eur. But still thinking about the A7 iii because better Eye AF, which i can get for 1500 €. Would you rather choose Z6 or A7 iii ? Is there big difference between Z6 Eye AF and A73's? I have now Nikon D90.
Thank you.
I find the Sony Eye AF better overall, but Nikon has made various improvements via firmware so it's not too far behind.
Also consider the lenses. Right now there is more choice of native lenses with Sony, for every budget needs, unless you'd consider adapting Nikkor F lenses on the Z6.
Awesome video - I learned things about my z6 that I didn't even know about!
Cool video and I've leaned a lot watching this video, specially as a beginner. I'm planning on getting a nice camera. If possible could you do a review of the Nikon Z6 vs the Fuji XT4? Between the Nikon Z6 or Fuji XT4 I might go with. I was thinking of the Sony A7iii to. Peace and love
15:24 There is a smile with the A7
Thank you for an interesting comparison video.
Good Comparison my Brother..Keep rocking for the upcoming Videos.. 🙏
This is a very, very good comparison. Thank you.
Great video , but for you PP7- Slog2 is the better choice video for Sony A7III
Excellent technical comparison my friend! Thank you so much!
Glad you enjoyed it!
I was expecting to see a test where Z6 4:2:2 would matter. Did not see any graduated colour changes. Also highlight recovery of 10bit vs 8bit would have been nice (shoot flat & to the right). I have seen a more detailed video on eye-AF, which looks to me to be more useful for portraits then general video. What I like about the Z6 was touchscreen AF, that's generally useful. Sony had very fast AF, and looks better at motion tracking. I kept noticing Sony colour science was on the orange side, and Nikon on the red. I like red more than orange. However human eye is more discerning with luminance than chrominance, which suggests the high ISO low noise performance of the Sony is more important. For video these cameras are very close. I still want to see some 10bit vs 8bit tests like I mentioned first.
Классный тест, Sony A7 III это уже не первое поколение их беззеркалок, а Nikon получается сделали вообще достойное первое поколение своих беззеркалок.
Young Freddy Mercury really knows what he's doing here. Great stuff. I'm a Nikon fan myself and as soon as mine dies (around 2040) I will make the leap to the Z.
Young Freddy Mercury?? :-D
That's exactly, what I thought, when the guy with the moustache showed up.
Thank you for this comparison!
Even though the Z6 has more noise, it looks alot better, sharper and more contrast.
Great content, thanks for uploading quality comparison !
My pleasure!
Best comparison video! Thank you so much!!!
Pro Res Raw soon? How much longer we wait?
Yeah I was hoping they would have released it by now.
That new function on that Z6 it’s ProRes Raw 10 Bit’s UHD on HDMI.
Good Job!!!
How do you remove the magenta from the skinton to the z6 in flat pp???
Z6 is definitely better if you don’t care about the price. A typical good-condition used a73 is almost half the price of z6 now.
I've been Nikon all my life. Looking to move from 35mm film to one of these. I'm liking the Nikon in many areas but I've got to say I'm hesitant to stick with Nikon due to the slow autofocus. I've seen it on other videos too. The Sony just smashes the competition out the water with the speed of the face and eye tracking. Seriously thinking about trading all the film cameras and 10 or so Nikon f lenses in and moving over to Sony. What do people think?
I've been impatiently waiting for some news to come from Sony and Nikon as far as replacements to the Z6 or A7iii. I'm ready to buy, but I'm struggling with which to buy. I'm even seriously considering the a6600. Sony got my attention with it's eye AF, and I was leaning Sony, but NOW Nikon just released a firmware that improves the AF. I'm still stuck trying to decide.
@@ElGuapo915 thanks for the update. Didn't hear about the firmware update. Thst makes me sway back to Nikon. Be easier as ive got the lenses. I'll also check out that other camera you mentioned. Thanks
Both are strong cameras for sure. It seems if you want you camera to more closely mimic the fully auto settings of your cell phone camera, the Sony has the edge, especially in the color and HDR department. But I think very few people would buy either camera for their ability to be mostly automatic in operation, or to actually "print" those 'in camera' color choices. This would totally defeat the purpose of editing in post where you have vastly more perspective and control over the image. It would be extremely difficult to make those kind of color decisions under the pressure of real world filming, without a high Rez onsite monitor, The Nikon seems to be clearly aimed at the cinematographer/filmmaker with higher quality output via HDMI and flatter profiles intended for editing after the fact. This is especially true if your shooting in HD where the image/detail of the Nikon is clearly better overall. The Nikon's 10bit output in 4k is the clear winner here for any serious film work. Once that changes to RAW output here in the near future, there will be no further comparison.
Both cameras use very similar sensors so it really is the total package/details/ handling that tips the scales.
Hi Mathieu, would you say that the A7iii with its 8bit S-Log profiles bears about the same dynamic range and color grade abiility as the Z6 with tis external log and 10bit?
Yes in terms of DR, but there is more colour grade ability with 10-bit (the Sony can produce more colour artefacts).
very nice video bro. thank you!
but you did forget the battery longlife
battery life is better on the A7 III
Fantastic test ! WOW!
man what a hell of a review. thank you!
cheers!
i like the Z6 better, good test
Now that it has been proven that Nikon has the best build quality and weather protection of all mirrorless cameras in the market today, the choice is easy. Thanks, good review.
view, Teardown of the Nikon Z7 Mirrorless Camera
The Lumix S cameras have a far superior build quality and weather sealing.
@@Skill_Issue92 Yes, they are very fine cameras but even bigger than DSLR. Hardly the mirrorless revolution we've all been waiting for. Nikon Z6/Z7 are a much better compromise between compact size and ergonomics than either Sony's A7 series or Panasonic S series.
It’s important to mention the lenses used. Going with Nikon has a huge advantage is the ability to use a ton of different lenses, most of whom have really excellent color. Using the sigma art lenses might make for a more neutral comparison, but it hobbles a lot of the Nikon’s advantages.
You can use a lot of different lenses with the Sony too. Plus let's be honest, if I had used Nikon lenses, I'm sure somebody else would have found something to say about that. Take this tests as they are: they show you the main differences you need to know. From there, you choose the one you like best and the rest of the work is up to you ;-)
wow .. cool and clear tests .. thank you
Amazing work, thank you.
In to low ISO test I just see less noise on Sony but with washed image quality and colors, like when you crank up the noise reduction levels. Nikon shows more fine detail, maybe that´s why more noise is visible. Nikon has more vibrant amazing colors to me.
Thank you! This was a very helpful comparison. If only NLOG didn't require an external recorder I might pick up a Z6.
Marin Real Estate Photography that’s coming with a firmware update
Raymond Garcia
How do you know that? Would be awesome!
@@raymondgarcia5535 internally N-log recording?
@@raymondgarcia5535 unfortunetly looks like not
its gotta be north wales, right? good work :) although I think sony's face tones tend to the green a bit too much for me.
Yes it is.
@@MathieuGasquetMirrorLessons Those river shots look very similar to Heidelberg Germany. Great comparison - I purchased the Z6 about 3-months ago, and I love it! Coming from a D4.
one thing I like about the z6 compared to the gh5 is the highlight rolloff is much nicer. It looks like the sony's rolloff is not quite as elegant as the z6 (this is a big issue for me as a real estate photographer, might not be for others!)
This is one of biggest today in infancy digital camera problem. How can we work with such immature products ? It's the easy & economical workflow winning, but products still sucks highlights like hell.
the ISO performance of the A7III is unreal in terms of noise
I didn't speak about battery life neither dual slot card of the sony camera.
The Z6ii has more contrast and looks cooler in video temperature, and is much harder on the pale skin tone. The A7iii seems to have a more cinematic look, with less contrast in most of the default video settings. But the A7iii looks terrible when panning, the whole image looks jiddery and wallowing, where as the Z6iii looks rock solid.
I've owned a Sony a6000 and a7ii and always get the colour artifacts (usually purple) on walls etc. Is this mainly a Sony problem?
Get your in cam white balance right or else it's snou problem
Can I have the A7III with the Nikon firmware? xD
Thank you very much..☺️☺️
Both Cameras use the same sensor from Sony, only the lens and softwares are the only differences...
What makes a camera are the things that work around the censor. Processor and software is the real deal.
HLG3 profile should've been included in the comparison too.
I have a question, towards the end of the this video, about 80% in, 17:33 you talk about setting the speed of the transition from one focus point to another for video on the touch screen of Z6.
Where do you do this in the menu on the Z6? I looked but could not see where in the Movie Menu on the Z6 What would be the settings? This would be very cool for video, Rack focus, by touch screen! Please!
Custom Setting Menu / g Movie / g4 and g5 (AF speed and AF Tracking Sensitivity)
i am confused plz suggest z6 or a7iii who is best in photography? plz plz..
Our full article might help ;-)
mirrorlesscomparison.com/sony-vs-nikon/z6-vs-a7iii/
@@MathieuGasquetMirrorLessons z6 best
It is damn difficult because overall i prefer the Nikon as a camera, but i like more the sharpness and rendering of the sony video....
" the sharpness and rendering of the sony video" wut?
me too. I like video from sony much more than z6 but the stability in z6 is a lot better than A7 iii. However low light video from sony is still the king. Maybe staying with Sony for a little bit longer to see if sony implement 4k60 at higher bitrate and improve its IBIS
The sharpness can also vary because of lens choice.
Yeah as far as I can tell they used an average Nikon lens up against a significantly sharper more expensive Zeiss Sony lens. Not entirely sure the test is fair.
Hope you test their respective 35mm 1.8 lenses soon
very very nice ..video ... sir... wow.........sony photo video .. best ... nikon photo best
Thanks
I think still sony has better image video if you doing some job, watch gerald undone when he compared to s1 still sony has better color accuracy. And if you say sony image flat, just change the contrast. But if u use for still, nikon has better color in skin tones
Ariawan Darmanto color accuracy at the expense of pleasing colors. That was a conscious choice on Nikon’s part.
Is there a brand with a worse ergonomics and after-sale service than Sony ? Camera performances are nothing compared to ease of use and reliability. That's why I sold my A7RIII after 4 month (and 3 break down), despite my awesome 55 F/1.8 Zeiss lens. But it seems that the 50 F/1.8 Z Nikon is about as good. So, this Nikon could be my next buy.
Great job! Thank you!
The Sony seems more magenta everywhere
Great stuff
why does nikon have the higher iso with much worse noise all around?
aDAM oscar because the Sony adds more noise reduction by default.
Noise reduction is added to 3rd iteration of A series cameras due to high noise level on astrophotography and avoid overheating but loses data a lot.
I prefer the Z6 over the a7iii. I own both cameras plus many more brands and the honest truth the NIKON is much better. Only someone who had all invested into Sony and or never picked up another brand will defend it at all cost.
The Z6 is amazing. Both photos and video. I now own 2 of them
It's clear hear ,z6 is the best choice
Great job!
Sony a7 iii lowlight beast 12:28
The skin tone on a7iii is so sick. Looks like the man in front of the camera is made of vegetable...
Thank You!!
Thank you
i have z6 i want to shoot video in nlog but i havent ninja v .... i want to shoot in nlog f6 pro moniter or not tell me some trips ....i cannot undestand what can i do ...plz help me ...
You need an external recorder to record in N-Log. The F6 Pro monitor doesn't have any recording option as far as I understand it.
Thanks for your information
8:02 what's with the color shift in couch and curtains in this side-by-side (also seen in log comparison later)? Based on your log profile color correction a minute later it seems the Nikon is less faithfully reproducing shadow colors?
At 8:02 I'm using the Flat profile on the Z6 and PP10 on the A7 III, without any correction in post. So the difference in the shadow areas is just the difference between the two cameras in terms of colour reproduction, with the Sony having more red/magenta and the Nikon more green.
11:52 That's Turin in the background!
ok
Ciampornio! Agnulott! Cicles!
skin colour on Z6 is superior than sony, but ... cannot beat fuji XH1
Thank you, the comparison I looked for
z6 NR high looks just as soft as the a73 raw at high iso
I was going to post a troll comment saying that this is a 4K comparison uploaded in 1080p. Then I realised this was I was a fucking idiot because it was upped in 4k. FML
nice video
The Sony looks better
In terms of design
What you are really buying into is the ecosystem, aka mount. The comparison is not even close when this is taken into account. Sony has a plethora of lenses whereas Nikon is getting lost in their own pointless apsc camera rather than making sure the Z cameras are getting a sensible lense selection.
Sony doesn't have native lenses when they started they were the "king of adapted lenses". Nikon now have 8-9 glasses in a span of 1 year.
they are basically the same camera, at least thats what i tell myself as a z6 owner
@6:53 Am i the only one who noticed his beard isnt centered?
So why do Sony filmers cry for a new A7s? I mean look at both of them in the High ISO test, these are both low light beasts!
Frankly speaking, differences doesn't matter, knowledge and skills of photographer is much more important ;-)
I think , Nikon performs better . This is my personel opinion only
хорошее сравнение, грамотное!