Glad you like them! If you like our video lessons, it would be appreciated if you could take 2 minutes of your time to leave us a review here: trustpilot.com/review/analystprep.com
Please do some examples where you are either given portfolio standard deviation or the portfolio expected return and you have to compute portfolio weights.
How do you determine which calculation use percentage and which arent? In example 1 the question's data use percentage, but removed in computation, but the the result is back on percentage. Thanks
Although answer C is correct, its a little off from the actual answer. The actual answer is 0.00849, not 0.00851. The mistake is in calculating the covariance, where the actual covariance is 0.00005550, not 0.0000561. I've calculated it multiple times so I'm pretty sure of it. Hope that helps.
Same, I thought I was wrong and had to recalculate multiple times, the incorrect part was the 2nd probability 0.6(0.08-0.082)(0.05-0.04975) which should have resulted in a negative number -0.0000003, but they got it as positive 0.0000003 so ended up with covariance of 0.0000561
Thanks, and you continue to share other course
These are great - thank you so much
Glad you like them! If you like our video lessons, it would be appreciated if you could take 2 minutes of your time to leave us a review here: trustpilot.com/review/analystprep.com
Please do some examples where you are either given portfolio standard deviation or the portfolio expected return and you have to compute portfolio weights.
Thank you!
You're welcome!
How do you determine which calculation use percentage and which arent? In example 1 the question's data use percentage, but removed in computation, but the the result is back on percentage. Thanks
Although answer C is correct, its a little off from the actual answer. The actual answer is 0.00849, not 0.00851. The mistake is in calculating the covariance, where the actual covariance is 0.00005550, not 0.0000561. I've calculated it multiple times so I'm pretty sure of it. Hope that helps.
Same, I thought I was wrong and had to recalculate multiple times, the incorrect part was the 2nd probability 0.6(0.08-0.082)(0.05-0.04975) which should have resulted in a negative number -0.0000003, but they got it as positive 0.0000003 so ended up with covariance of 0.0000561
5:43 in the note is a litle mistake :)
The last sigma should be the rho for correlation :)
👍
👍