NAD+ and FAD+ Cofactors

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 1 янв 2025

Комментарии • 70

  • @davidcastillo5623
    @davidcastillo5623 6 лет назад +10

    You taught me more in 9 Mins than my chem professor in a whole quarter

  • @Jagopei97
    @Jagopei97 10 лет назад +4

    I'm from Spain but I understood everything well. Great video my friend I had dudes about this but they are now resolved

  • @GoodbyeRubyTu3sday
    @GoodbyeRubyTu3sday 7 лет назад +18

    Correct me if I'm wrong, shouldn't the reactant in the reduction reaction of FAD be FAD instead of FAD+? Is the + not correct? Because otherwise the reaction doesn't make sense

  • @damianokoroafor8497
    @damianokoroafor8497 8 лет назад +9

    The reaction FAD+ + 2H+ +2e- ===== FADH2 seems wrong. The net reaction comes out to be FAD(+)H2.

    • @bobtheman50
      @bobtheman50 8 лет назад +2

      I think you are correct. My biochem text has the reaction as FAD + H+ + H: = FADH2, where H+ is a proton and H: is a hydride ion.

    • @fazeel147
      @fazeel147 8 лет назад +5

      You're soooooo beautiful Damian

    • @danielstacey2660
      @danielstacey2660 7 лет назад +4

      I think the error comes from the original molecule charge. The FAD+ should actually be just FAD, without the +.
      Then it just accepts two neutral H atoms basically (One proton and one electron from each)

  • @danalasa
    @danalasa 7 лет назад +10

    rookie question incoming: why do we need FAD+ and FADH2 if we have NAD+ and NADH?

    • @ioNicholas
      @ioNicholas 5 лет назад +12

      I had the exact same question the first time I learned this. I think it has to do with the differences in their redox potential. High energy hydrides can be released for large amounts of energy with NADH but this is not always the ideal scenario. In some instances less energy is required for a particular metabolic step so FADH2 can be used to release an amount of energy which more precisely fits the needs of that step. If we only used NADH then we would be releasing more energy than is necessary at times. If anyone has a more precise answer feel free to elaborate or correct me.

    • @oogenesis12
      @oogenesis12 3 года назад +1

      FAD can transfer single electrons (or two electrons), NAD+ can only transfer 2 electrons

  • @MakoKong
    @MakoKong 10 лет назад +2

    Finally, a lecture on nad that makes sense and that you keep track of. Great video

    • @AKLECTURES
      @AKLECTURES  10 лет назад

      Jeff thanks! :)

    • @nellyhoffman6194
      @nellyhoffman6194 8 лет назад

      Man you explain better than my professor of biochemistry ! lol

  • @NikkisTemptation1
    @NikkisTemptation1 5 лет назад +2

    I love your videos they help me revise concepts going into post grad. However, can you please discuss the role that magnesium plays in this? It doesn’t seem to be clear in any teachings anywhere!

  • @leaamira7996
    @leaamira7996 3 года назад

    So much better explained than any german video

  • @rizamkhan2143
    @rizamkhan2143 5 лет назад +1

    Nice explanation

  • @mattphorwich
    @mattphorwich 3 года назад

    Great video! Inspire and educate! God bless the multiverse!

  • @carryon5021
    @carryon5021 4 года назад

    Thanks, the speech was direct and easy to grasp.

  • @nellyhoffman6194
    @nellyhoffman6194 8 лет назад +1

    Thank you ak lectures !

  • @saram7586
    @saram7586 9 лет назад

    this guy is the real mvp man!

  • @dellah8656
    @dellah8656 7 лет назад +3

    FADH2 is synthesized in protein complex one?? Is that an error?

    • @ASD321XYZ
      @ASD321XYZ 3 года назад

      Naa in Complex 2, where no hydrogen ions are pumped (the only complex that doesn't pump hydrogen ions out of the 5)

  • @elanomiguel4698
    @elanomiguel4698 5 лет назад

    My question is
    Nad and fad always binding to apoenzyme. OR can be exist in free form without binding to apoenzyme

  • @arpitabanerjee7665
    @arpitabanerjee7665 7 лет назад

    thanks for all the great videos. u made biochem easy!!

  • @alyaasaad433
    @alyaasaad433 5 лет назад

    You are a great person 👏👏👏👏

  • @EducatorSharmin
    @EducatorSharmin 5 лет назад

    Amazing class!!!

  • @goji8430
    @goji8430 6 лет назад

    Should I be taking NAD like Niagen Nicotinamide Riboside or NDAH? Which one is better to take?

  • @Ricardo-jg3jf
    @Ricardo-jg3jf 7 лет назад

    So if NAD supplementation makes sense does FAD supplementation make sense also?

  • @rennierennie321
    @rennierennie321 6 лет назад

    Thank you sir. But, are they not coenzymes?...(organic non-protein part)

  • @SissouwChan
    @SissouwChan 7 лет назад

    Everything makes sense to me now, thank you! :)

  • @prational
    @prational 10 лет назад

    Excellent lecture!
    Thanks

  • @SuperLika17
    @SuperLika17 4 года назад

    great video

  • @AFGPride2332
    @AFGPride2332 9 лет назад

    This is Golden!

    • @AKLECTURES
      @AKLECTURES  9 лет назад

      Hasib Haidary lol thanks! :)

  • @duhaarshadshaker3951
    @duhaarshadshaker3951 4 года назад

    Thank you so much ❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️

  • @gracehutahaean3306
    @gracehutahaean3306 3 года назад

    Could you help me explain this? Actually how many H+ that NAD+ accepts? I also read there is anothet equation :
    NAD + 2H+ + 2e --> NADH + H
    I'm confused 🙏

  • @amandagarza5050
    @amandagarza5050 7 лет назад

    Please make more videos for vitamin metabolism!

  • @sciencenerd7639
    @sciencenerd7639 3 года назад

    thank you

  • @averybrennan3216
    @averybrennan3216 2 года назад

    Fairly certain that NAD+ is a coenzyme

  • @davidanderson8778
    @davidanderson8778 8 лет назад

    so is this witnessed in human subjects, is it verifiable?

  • @whatdoyouknow4843
    @whatdoyouknow4843 8 лет назад

    Where are you from.... I can't place the accent?

  • @blastbangblast
    @blastbangblast 9 лет назад

    Very good explanation indeed :)

  • @willyt2357
    @willyt2357 8 лет назад

    Thank you sir!

  • @donnam4730
    @donnam4730 3 года назад

    lol who is this person!!!! so easy to understand!

  • @abbagarba641
    @abbagarba641 8 лет назад

    thanks a lot Sir

  • @MrNerveux
    @MrNerveux 3 года назад

    "and when we PAHMP EM"

  • @fadeskywards1245
    @fadeskywards1245 6 лет назад +1

    What's your age, man? Great explanations btw

  • @sabretoothed99
    @sabretoothed99 7 лет назад

    FAD needs boron as a cofactor

  • @BraianaDiaz
    @BraianaDiaz 7 лет назад

    amazing

  • @shilpaaswal6469
    @shilpaaswal6469 5 лет назад

    Sir pls make a video on fMN nd NADP+

  • @raxmaibrahim3166
    @raxmaibrahim3166 9 лет назад

    helpful thanks

  • @krestenhermansen1260
    @krestenhermansen1260 5 лет назад

    Is FAD+ and NAD+ cofactors? I thought it was coenzymes.

    • @qehc
      @qehc 5 лет назад +1

      Coenzymes are cofactors

  • @sabbyschannel1293
    @sabbyschannel1293 10 лет назад +1

    thanks so much!!

  • @cloudmintswirl1169
    @cloudmintswirl1169 5 лет назад

    did anybody else get ASMR feels from watching this?

  • @liviankasiraja5670
    @liviankasiraja5670 10 лет назад

    very useful . thanks :)

    • @AKLECTURES
      @AKLECTURES  10 лет назад

      Livian Kasiraja You're welcome Livian!

  • @abeersh8541
    @abeersh8541 7 лет назад +1

    I don't understand how reduction of NAD to NADH 😭

    • @danielstacey2660
      @danielstacey2660 7 лет назад +4

      The incoming high energy "package" consists of three things: H+ and TWO electrons.
      The first electron is used to reduce the original NAD+ molecule to NAD.
      The second electron is used to reduce the H+ to H.
      Now the NAD and H can join to make the product (NADH). All electrons have been accounted for.

  • @yagmurcamd
    @yagmurcamd 2 года назад +1

    Progress.

  • @saram7586
    @saram7586 9 лет назад

    wicked man!!!

  • @mariamali1190
    @mariamali1190 3 года назад

    ليش ماكو ترجمة عربي -،-

  • @martinushjrungnes9542
    @martinushjrungnes9542 5 лет назад +1

    Bro relax please

  • @whatdoyouknow4843
    @whatdoyouknow4843 8 лет назад

    Where are you from.... I can't place the accent?