@@rebeccarittenhouse2203 they also shouldn’t stand quietly when fascism is at the door either because that’s usually when people say things like “why didn’t they say anything?”
I cannot get my head around the fact that for a newspaper, supposed to make "neutral"news, it is normal to endorse a politcal party. Is this not contradictory in itsself? Maybe that is the european on me
@@WizPigTactics In America every News Outlet is not News but opinions. If they were news we would never have see stories about Tawana Brawley or the Duke Players or Kyle Rittenhous or jussie smollett or the Covington Catholic school. They would check the Stories and not run with out checking. So there is no NEWS left not in America and not in Europe. That is why 89% of Americans have little to no trust in the Media. Opinion over News Narrative over News
@@mulimuhninimu459 Because the idea that any newspaper could be neutral is a fantastic idea. The British newspaper industry all looks at the news with their own ideological slants and everyone knows it eg, Guardian is left, Telegraph is right etc
@@fleischersgrasscuttingserv6441 Does not mean that you shouldn't at least try to be more neutral and objective. You can make the same argument about democracy. Should we just abolish democracy whatsover just because it is not ideal and not fully resembling the will of the people?
@@douglemay7989 think it’s more likely related to Voodoo and not quite as wide spread. I work side by side with many Haitians at an Amazon FC. They’ve told me kittys are often on the menu along with dogs in Haiti. As well as more likely used in voodoo practices. Not by all, but some.
@@ToxiCistya couple minutes of a reddit search will confirm Haitians do in fact engage in these practices...what's culturally acceptable in one demographic may seem deplorable to another
Finally, someone who can see that reality of the chicken head liberals, you're right, no president has ever been elected because of being endorsed by a newspaper.
It's called an editorial. Ever hear of them? Editorials are not under journalism. They are the opinions of individual editors. It's been the tradition for as long as there have been newspapers. Maybe you should go back to school.
@@outerrealm I didn't ask what it was. I simply stated my opinion. So according to you if I had more education I would have a different opinion or would I just be smart enough to keep my opinions to myself?
@@SlyFoxZack Well, there is a strong correlation of the level of education and IQ with political views. Less smart, less educated people tend to vote conservative/republican.
It's totally unhinged but at this point if you don't understand that leftists will gladly engage in doublethink if it facilitates their seizure of power, you're not paying attention!
The LA Times Editor did exactly what she should have done. Anytime you cannot go along with what the boss wants, you should move on. The boss may not always be right but he or she is always the boss.
As usual for a right-winger, you have your story all wrong. The editorial board DiD endorse Harris, but the paper’s conservative owner refused to allow them to publish it. Typical right-wing censorship.
Newspapers shouldn't be endorsing a side anyway, not if they want to be considered news. This is a good move by the owner. Editors are highly replaceable in a shrinking industry.
Media, deciding that they should actually be unbiased and not endorse candidates or promote them? Or… could it be they understand she’s a horrible candidate and don’t want to be associated with her.
I own the paper. when you own your own paper you can endorse who you want. I think the owner did not want to lose anymore subscribers. So he did not want to pick a side.
I know you are well off financially and are not competing with illegals and are not worried about them suppressing your wages. I work a job (trucker) that supposedly Americans don't want to do. The millions of illegitimate work visas given out in this administration has decimated transportation wages and rates. We are forgotten.
Why? Corporations are considered people and deserve to donate and endorse candidates thanks to that appalling Citizens United ruling. If they shouldn't no company should.
Hopefully we are seeing the start of a long needed housecleaning in the MSM. Reading the LA Times, the New York Times this past year is like reading Pravda
Gotta disagree with Anna. News organizations in general shouldn’t be endorsing anyone. News organizations should not be trying to persuade anyone of who to vote for. Just report the goddamn news and let the people decide like they used to.
You are right. That's it, as to do anything else is a propaganda. Propaganda is not news. Sadly we have not too many news but we have a lots of propaganda.
That is exactly how these price gougers feel and therefore raising their prices unnecessarily on food and gas. So, thank you for pointing that fact out.
Do you know why LA Times, The Washington post and others are not associating with her? Because if she wins and it (will) all goes to shitty town, no one can blame them.
Wait, you're telling me that a newspaper that is supposed to report the news and not be a propaganda rag, isn't endorsing a candidate? Wow... Something tells me that they're better off without that editor.
It's the editorial board. Editorial boards are opinion based parts of the paper. This part of the paper is not actual news. That's the actual news section.
@@jcreek2002 even editorials are supposed to have some basis in reality, and traditionally, editorial boards have been bipartisan where they put out opinions on both sides and let the readers decide for themselves. There's a term for one-sided editorial boards; propaganda.
@@asinglemaleinuk dude, I have relatives who were imprisoned in the concentration camps during WW2 and a grandparent who liberated one of the camps. You sound like an idiot throwing that phrase around. Trump is many terrible things, a Nazi isn't one of them. Go back to school and learn about what Nazism actually means while you're shipping money off to actual ideological Nazis in Ukraine, okay?
Outside of a couple of news outlets talking about it, how does her resignation really affect the paper....not hard to find some new English major to do the same job
People everywhere are accepting that her campaign is failing. Notice all players slowly backing away from the disaster just prior to the final known outcome.
Kudos to the editor for taking a stand and exposing how even allegedly “liberal” papers with anti-Trump readers are still controlled by conservative leaning owners.
Cenk, kudos for allowing Anna (and other guests) the freedom to express their views and opinions. That’s why I like the show. Anna provides diversity in THOUGHT which is heathy and the way it SHOULD be. Left or right circlejerks don’t challenge you to defend your positions or options which is how you get extremism. Keep up the great work TYT. 👍🏻
Ana i have to disagree. Should the owners allow unbiased reporting? Yes! Should they allow their business to be a vehicle for their employees politics? Absolutely not!
If it’s wrong for the owner to say he doesn’t agree with the editor why does the editor get to run off anyone with a different opinion. Cenk is 100% right there is no journalistic integrity it’s just dollars and marketing.
What is the point of making an endorsement every year if you are going to unconditionally support the Democratic candidate? There comes a point where your endorsement is meaningless.
I do not like these so called endorsements. Nobody should in news endorse anybody. I do not even think they should use singers and actors to endorse politicians.
If you have a track record of being biased, removing that bias is an endorsement of the other candidate. So while Cenk may have made Anna happy with his perspective, the owners move in and of itself clearly shows favorable bias towards Trump by default. The editor did the right thing and hopefully flipped em off on the way out. Trump=military against US citizens who disagree with him. Is that really that hard to remember?
I miss real journalism. It used to be you could watch 1 news station for 30 minutes and be caught up on all the important news for the week. There was mo spin. The things that set different news organizations apart was the accuracy of the information and how fast they got it. They would never tell you what to think or who to vote for. Now everyone has a spin or an angle they try to preach to you. I have to watch the news for an hour or 2 every day from a wide verity of sources to get a full pucture of what's going on in the world and even then I'm wondering which side is lying.
Local news is still the best. These 24-hour news channels, that have their entire business model based around you watching out of anger or fear, are not that trustworthy.
I didn’t know newspapers could endorse candidates. I thought all journalists were supposed to not voice their opinions on things like that and have biased reporting
@@jaynecobb6711Folks are really showing their ignorance! That’s why these incompetent Republican leaders can literally do and say ANYTHING, bc they know their base will support them!🤡🤡🤡
Tucker Carlson was the only one in Legacy media to criticize the endless wars and Fox News allowed him to do it. This is one of the main reasons he became so popular. He also invited progressives on his show and he would let them speak. Fox did lose advertising revenue from defense contractors because they want media outlets they advertise on to push endless wars which Tucker Carlson refused to do and that was bad for Raytheon and Lockheed Martin's bottom line.
@@douglemay7989 It's funny because liberals used to love Edward Snowden and Julian Assange but once they exposed the Clintons like they did Bush/Cheney, now everyone is a Russian agent including Tulsi Gabbard. News Flash, Russia is no longer communist and I've been to Moscow and St Petersburg 3 didn't times. They are very nice people.
Calling anything that is owned by a billionaire "liberal" is a bad joke, you don't know what you're talking about, NO billionaires are "liberal" hording that much capital is 100% against the concept of liberal politics.
@@justsaying14 just because you don't hate gays, doesn't make you "liberal" i would love to hear what policy decisions make a FOR PROFIT business "liberal" somehow?
Cenk, when a newspaper gives an endorsement doesn't that imply a bias in a certian direction? Saying that canidate is the type of candidate tha aligns with the staff/owner of that paper?
well first of all, if the owner owns a company then it ABSOLUTELY has power on who the paper endorses or not endorses. Second of all, it is NOT the paper's job to endorse anyone. an endorsing is an opinion
These spoiled brat editors and reporters have policies that have brought these newspapers to ruin. About time that these owners took control of these money pits newspapers
I would have fired her and any others like her a long time ago. The duty of a newspaper is to report the news fairly and impartially. State and present the facts. When a media forum takes sides it becomes a surrogate of the state regardless of party affiliation. Garza is an embarrassment of free speech in that she, and others like her, took sides.
Mabe is something to do with jailing parents for taking care of their sick children. That was a story that state stopped and the owner unfortunately knows.
When ever there is a human involved there will always be emotional bias. Good journalism is presenting pure untainted facts and allowing the consumer to arrive at their own conclusions.
The term "news" stopped having any meaning once expectations became attached to it. We need the newspaper to be X number of pages. It needs to be printed by 6am. The TV news starts at 5pm and needs to be 30 minutes to satisfy our advertisers. Suddenly, journalists became content creators and the newsroom became a business center.
This is a nothing burger anyways because let’s be real it’s not like Trump is gonna even remotely win California 🤣. Who cares about any of this? Even if by some stretch they endorsed Trump he isn’t winning CA!
News papers should not endorse anyone.
@@paularmstrong1566 yes, about 200 years ago. Tradition of newspapers endorsing candidates is almost as old as newspapers themselves.
And the rest of News media.
@@rebeccarittenhouse2203 they also shouldn’t stand quietly when fascism is at the door either because that’s usually when people say things like “why didn’t they say anything?”
Better. They learnt from 2020 who not to endorse.
I cannot get my head around the fact that for a newspaper, supposed to make "neutral"news, it is normal to endorse a politcal party. Is this not contradictory in itsself? Maybe that is the european on me
every news outlet has a bias on their opinion pieces.
@@WizPigTactics In America every News Outlet is not News but opinions. If they were news we would never have see stories about Tawana Brawley or the Duke Players or Kyle Rittenhous or jussie smollett or the Covington Catholic school. They would check the Stories and not run with out checking. So there is no NEWS left not in America and not in Europe. That is why 89% of Americans have little to no trust in the Media. Opinion over News Narrative over News
@@mulimuhninimu459 Because the idea that any newspaper could be neutral is a fantastic idea. The British newspaper industry all looks at the news with their own ideological slants and everyone knows it eg, Guardian is left, Telegraph is right etc
@@fleischersgrasscuttingserv6441 Does not mean that you shouldn't at least try to be more neutral and objective. You can make the same argument about democracy. Should we just abolish democracy whatsover just because it is not ideal and not fully resembling the will of the people?
@@mulimuhninimu459 you don’t understand the difference between news and opinion?
Endorse no one. Endorse ethics. Endorse accountability.
Even CNN is waving the flag of defeat after the town hall performance by KH.
They are eating the dogs.
@@douglemay7989 think it’s more likely related to Voodoo and not quite as wide spread. I work side by side with many Haitians at an Amazon FC. They’ve told me kittys are often on the menu along with dogs in Haiti. As well as more likely used in voodoo practices. Not by all, but some.
@@ToxiCistya couple minutes of a reddit search will confirm Haitians do in fact engage in these practices...what's culturally acceptable in one demographic may seem deplorable to another
And they wonder why media is declining. People want news not propaganda.
Vote no on WWIII, no to WEF depopulation plans, no on Billions in taxes to invading Venezuelan gangs, no to death and poverty. Vote for Trump.
Get off the conspiracy web sites champ.
You look like a deluded fool.
Let's be real. Nobody gives a shit about newspaper endorsements. They never have and they never will.
Finally, someone who can see that reality of the chicken head liberals, you're right, no president has ever been elected because of being endorsed by a newspaper.
Doesn't an endorsement take the impartiality out of journalism? Journalists and media shouldn't be taking sides...
It's called an editorial. Ever hear of them? Editorials are not under journalism. They are the opinions of individual editors. It's been the tradition for as long as there have been newspapers. Maybe you should go back to school.
@@outerrealm I didn't ask what it was. I simply stated my opinion. So according to you if I had more education I would have a different opinion or would I just be smart enough to keep my opinions to myself?
@@SlyFoxZack Well, there is a strong correlation of the level of education and IQ with political views. Less smart, less educated people tend to vote conservative/republican.
Someone resigns because NO ONE was endorsed? Not her opponent but NO ONE. She can go start her own newspaper I guess.
Finally a news outlet trying to remain neutral like they should.
This new narrative that the media is easy on Trump is wild 😂
They've been massaging his balls all his life.
It's totally unhinged but at this point if you don't understand that leftists will gladly engage in doublethink if it facilitates their seizure of power, you're not paying attention!
the failing liberals will grasp at anything to explain why they lose. That is anything but their own actions
She's quitting because the owner doesn't want to run a propaganda rag for Harris, good riddance.
Cenk coming in with a legitimate take at the end earns a little bit of respect from me.
The Democratic Party is finished. The infighting is friggin' hilarious.
The LA Times Editor did exactly what she should have done. Anytime you cannot go along with what the boss wants, you should move on. The boss may not always be right but he or she is always the boss.
The LA Times doesn’t want their name attached to the inevitable loser 😂😂😂😂😂
It needs to be said... Kamala is from a middle class background
I hear she lived in a neighborhood in which people took pride in their lawn.
Imagine being so bad that even a far left editorial wont endorse you in your own state
Brutal! Have you considered a career in MME?
MMA, mixed martial arts.
As usual for a right-winger, you have your story all wrong. The editorial board DiD endorse Harris, but the paper’s conservative owner refused to allow them to publish it. Typical right-wing censorship.
@@andrewmastin4312delusional take
@@andrewmastin4312
C'mon Andy. It's a slap in the face.
The old pie in the face type hilarity.
He's the owner. He can do whatever the heck he wants with his company. Also, The Washington Post has just decided not to endorse a candidate.
I am really happy that she started to identify as black instead of Indian. It was an embarrassment.
Your job won't let you use its resources to further your own personal opinions? Welcome to the rest of the world. Go ahead and quit.
Newspapers shouldn't be endorsing a side anyway, not if they want to be considered news. This is a good move by the owner. Editors are highly replaceable in a shrinking industry.
I agree. Now, she's looking for another job and will soon realize she's not a hot commodity.
I’m sure that editor will be missed dearly and immediately replaced.
Newspapers should stop endorsing period
Abso-fuckin-lutely
Agreed completely
Media, deciding that they should actually be unbiased and not endorse candidates or promote them? Or… could it be they understand she’s a horrible candidate and don’t want to be associated with her.
I own the paper. when you own your own paper you can endorse who you want. I think the owner did not want to lose anymore subscribers. So he did not want to pick a side.
I know you are well off financially and are not competing with illegals and are not worried about them suppressing your wages. I work a job (trucker) that supposedly Americans don't want to do. The millions of illegitimate work visas given out in this administration has decimated transportation wages and rates. We are forgotten.
I think the news media should report the truth.
They should not endorse any politician.
Why?
Conflict of interest.
Newspapers should never endorse anyone
Why? Corporations are considered people and deserve to donate and endorse candidates thanks to that appalling Citizens United ruling. If they shouldn't no company should.
Agreed completely
@@shawnsosa1159 Corporations are not people, and should not be considered as such. It is a TRAVESTY that they are.
Hopefully we are seeing the start of a long needed housecleaning in the MSM. Reading the LA Times, the New York Times this past year is like reading Pravda
Fun fact: The LA Times owner is a Chinese South African billionaire who was born in a city called Gqeberha.
Gotta disagree with Anna. News organizations in general shouldn’t be endorsing anyone. News organizations should not be trying to persuade anyone of who to vote for. Just report the goddamn news and let the people decide like they used to.
You are right. That's it, as to do anything else is a propaganda. Propaganda is not news. Sadly we have not too many news but we have a lots of propaganda.
His paper. His rules. Ana is so annoying
That is exactly how these price gougers feel and therefore raising their prices unnecessarily on food and gas. So, thank you for pointing that fact out.
Cenk allows everybody to have their own opinion on The Young Turks except Jimmy Dore
Dore's opinion goes with whomever writes the biggest cheques.
I am not a friend of TYT nor of the left but Jimmy Dore is a lunatic with no coherent views.
Jimmy is bought. He shouldn't have a voice anymore.
@@bunyipdragon9499 exactly.
@@moonie9000 do you believe the same thing about Ana
The paper’s owner has ever right withhold an endorsement for any candidate. It’s his paper and didn’t want anyone speaking on his behalf.
Yet let others “speak on his behalf” every election up to this point. Gotcha.
These journalists are just activists… The owner of the paper has all the rights here. It is his business.
Post media buying up all the real news to give us fake conservative news. Nothing but fascists.
You don’t understand the difference between a journalist and an Editorial Board.
Do you know why LA Times, The Washington post and others are not associating with her? Because if she wins and it (will) all goes to shitty town, no one can blame them.
That certainly made sense.
Wait, you're telling me that a newspaper that is supposed to report the news and not be a propaganda rag, isn't endorsing a candidate?
Wow... Something tells me that they're better off without that editor.
It's the editorial board. Editorial boards are opinion based parts of the paper. This part of the paper is not actual news. That's the actual news section.
@@jcreek2002 even editorials are supposed to have some basis in reality, and traditionally, editorial boards have been bipartisan where they put out opinions on both sides and let the readers decide for themselves.
There's a term for one-sided editorial boards; propaganda.
So you’re happy they ignore a Nazi ?
@@asinglemaleinuk dude, I have relatives who were imprisoned in the concentration camps during WW2 and a grandparent who liberated one of the camps. You sound like an idiot throwing that phrase around. Trump is many terrible things, a Nazi isn't one of them.
Go back to school and learn about what Nazism actually means while you're shipping money off to actual ideological Nazis in Ukraine, okay?
Soon-Shiong twice privately met with Donald Trump during his presidential transition to unsuccessfully try and get a position in the administration.
The editorial board can endorse her just not through the owners paper. That’s his prerogative
Outside of a couple of news outlets talking about it, how does her resignation really affect the paper....not hard to find some new English major to do the same job
Ana aren't you okay with LA Times pivoting to a "fairer" reporting style?
Electing to make no endorsement is a move against Harris? I am almost sure you are smarter than that.
He’s the owner he can do what he wants
Of course that's why she quit
Exactly 💯
No newspapers should be endorsing anyone. They need to stick to journalism.
Kamala is a “perfectly decent democrat challenger”? That’s what you call “damning with faint praise.”
What a baby! Quit your job you lump.
Just maybe they wanted not to embarass the paper and to try to save some shreds of credibility
Even the LAT realizes that Kamala would be a HORRIBLE choice for POTUS.
It's another rich guy using his money to influence politics.
Apparently the LA Times can see a $1,000,000,000+ sinking ship.
🤨 Now he doesn't have to fire the parasite activist.
People everywhere are accepting that her campaign is failing. Notice all players slowly backing away from the disaster just prior to the final known outcome.
Kudos to the editor for taking a stand and exposing how even allegedly “liberal” papers with anti-Trump readers are still controlled by conservative leaning owners.
Maybe the paper owner wasn't comfortable endorsing genocide in gaza
Cenk, kudos for allowing Anna (and other guests) the freedom to express their views and opinions. That’s why I like the show. Anna provides diversity in THOUGHT which is heathy and the way it SHOULD be.
Left or right circlejerks don’t challenge you to defend your positions or options which is how you get extremism. Keep up the great work TYT. 👍🏻
It looks weird since they endorsed her 3 times before 😂 twice for AG and once for US Senate
Ana i have to disagree. Should the owners allow unbiased reporting? Yes! Should they allow their business to be a vehicle for their employees politics? Absolutely not!
The only one who “should be allowed” to do anything is the owner. That’s the perk of ownership.
Meh, she doesn't have to like it and she can resign. Its a free economy.
I don't like journalism getting involved with mandates etc.
If it’s wrong for the owner to say he doesn’t agree with the editor why does the editor get to run off anyone with a different opinion. Cenk is 100% right there is no journalistic integrity it’s just dollars and marketing.
I forgot why I stopped watching TYT
They want to avoid any backlash once trump wins. Good strategy
lol...good riddance i hope no one hires her ever !
The owner of the paper can do what he wants to. It's his paper. The editorial lady is out of line. She works for the owner. She was right to resign.
It’s the owner’s brand of course he gets final say on an endorsement using his brand.
What is the point of making an endorsement every year if you are going to unconditionally support the Democratic candidate? There comes a point where your endorsement is meaningless.
I do not like these so called endorsements. Nobody should in news endorse anybody. I do not even think they should use singers and actors to endorse politicians.
Well spoken---I agree 100%!
Me too!
i cant believe they quit because they couldnt shill a corporatist. its not worth it at all
The owner of the paper has the right to not endorse either candidate.
God riddence
The real headline is "LA times unable to lie to itself about Kamala"
Most attention LA Times has gotten in years, so smart move from a marketing perspective
If you have a track record of being biased, removing that bias is an endorsement of the other candidate. So while Cenk may have made Anna happy with his perspective, the owners move in and of itself clearly shows favorable bias towards Trump by default.
The editor did the right thing and hopefully flipped em off on the way out.
Trump=military against US citizens who disagree with him. Is that really that hard to remember?
Per MLK, Jr. "In the end, we will remember not the words of our enemies, but the silence of our friends."
And Kamala just lost another prominent endorsement, it’s obvious the ship is sinking, the joy is gone.
I miss real journalism. It used to be you could watch 1 news station for 30 minutes and be caught up on all the important news for the week. There was mo spin. The things that set different news organizations apart was the accuracy of the information and how fast they got it. They would never tell you what to think or who to vote for.
Now everyone has a spin or an angle they try to preach to you. I have to watch the news for an hour or 2 every day from a wide verity of sources to get a full pucture of what's going on in the world and even then I'm wondering which side is lying.
Local news is still the best. These 24-hour news channels, that have their entire business model based around you watching out of anger or fear, are not that trustworthy.
If this election is so consequential, it's deeply irresponsible to not make an endorsement
It's only consequential for the two party system
I didn’t know newspapers could endorse candidates. I thought all journalists were supposed to not voice their opinions on things like that and have biased reporting
It is called a OPINION PAGE.
That is where both sides get to express their OPINION on a subject. Both pro and con.
What is so difficult about this?
@@jaynecobb6711Folks are really showing their ignorance! That’s why these incompetent Republican leaders can literally do and say ANYTHING, bc they know their base will support them!🤡🤡🤡
After eight year of calling Trump Hitler they've decided, ehh, Harris is no better.
cenk has no problem with his staff expressing their opinions as long as they understand his is the correct one.
Freedom of the Press means Freedom of the OWNERS of the Press. It's always been this way.
La times , isn’t that a French newspaper.
Lol. Nice!!
Good one!
haha
Tucker Carlson was the only one in Legacy media to criticize the endless wars and Fox News allowed him to do it. This is one of the main reasons he became so popular. He also invited progressives on his show and he would let them speak. Fox did lose advertising revenue from defense contractors because they want media outlets they advertise on to push endless wars which Tucker Carlson refused to do and that was bad for Raytheon and Lockheed Martin's bottom line.
He can shop in Moscow for the rest of his life, as far as I am concerned.
@@douglemay7989 It's funny because liberals used to love Edward Snowden and Julian Assange but once they exposed the Clintons like they did Bush/Cheney, now everyone is a Russian agent including Tulsi Gabbard. News Flash, Russia is no longer communist and I've been to Moscow and St Petersburg 3 didn't times. They are very nice people.
Wapo too, they refused to endorse her
Calling anything that is owned by a billionaire "liberal" is a bad joke, you don't know what you're talking about, NO billionaires are "liberal" hording that much capital is 100% against the concept of liberal politics.
This assumed connection baffled me since the first time it was brought to my opinion.
@@justsaying14 just because you don't hate gays, doesn't make you "liberal" i would love to hear what policy decisions make a FOR PROFIT business "liberal" somehow?
Quiting is never helpful to any cause.
Cenk, when a newspaper gives an endorsement doesn't that imply a bias in a certian direction? Saying that canidate is the type of candidate tha aligns with the staff/owner of that paper?
The owner made a good move. Isn't being independent what journalism is all about?
well first of all, if the owner owns a company then it ABSOLUTELY has power on who the paper endorses or not endorses.
Second of all, it is NOT the paper's job to endorse anyone. an endorsing is an opinion
These spoiled brat editors and reporters have policies that have brought these newspapers to ruin. About time that these owners took control of these money pits newspapers
Agree 100%
Does an endorsement from a newspaper translate into getting undecideds to vote anyways?
I would have fired her and any others like her a long time ago. The duty of a newspaper is to report the news fairly and impartially. State and present the facts. When a media forum takes sides it becomes a surrogate of the state regardless of party affiliation. Garza is an embarrassment of free speech in that she, and others like her, took sides.
Mabe is something to do with jailing parents for taking care of their sick children. That was a story that state stopped and the owner unfortunately knows.
Yeah, that's definitely it.
When ever there is a human involved there will always be emotional bias. Good journalism is presenting pure untainted facts and allowing the consumer to arrive at their own conclusions.
These jokers finally accepted that they are doing propaganda for Kamala
Okay, Cenks. Hire Gutfeld! Also: re-name the show more accurately: "Hot Armenians with Brains. "
The term "news" stopped having any meaning once expectations became attached to it.
We need the newspaper to be X number of pages. It needs to be printed by 6am. The TV news starts at 5pm and needs to be 30 minutes to satisfy our advertisers. Suddenly, journalists became content creators and the newsroom became a business center.
This is a nothing burger anyways because let’s be real it’s not like Trump is gonna even remotely win California 🤣. Who cares about any of this? Even if by some stretch they endorsed Trump he isn’t winning CA!
Ana, you STILL put your blush too high on your cheeks. Hit the hollows. You are very young looking, so you can do this without looking older.
All should quit and boycott the LA Times and let the chicken owner run the LA Times by himself!