A few things I ran into putting together the BF-110. www.bitgohobby.com/Dynam-BF-1... Dubro EZ Connector: www.dubro.com/collections/e-z... Never Stop the RC!
Thanks for the information….great video….I admire Dynam…even though the builds are a pain….they make the most interesting planes that you can’t find anywhere else…hint hint….thanks again guys.
Its a great looking plane. I think we have all had kits like this .. Y'know felt like no one tested the darn thing for fit before sending it out to sell. Nothing quite fits right and a lot of the build is a struggle. Oh yes been there . done that. Thanks for sharing Jon.
I have a love/hate relationship with Dynam. I think everyone who has had the "pleasure" of owning one had that moment of clarity just before throwing tools across the room. I like the planes, I really do! But good gravy... the build.
Great tips for any builder. I like Dynam because I get to tinker with whatever model it may be. Sometimes you just want to work on something, preferably a plane. AirHammer out
👍👍😊 Nice to see this model up close.. And great tips ! Not just for this model - no factory line is perfect - better to check everything than just trust and be sorry .. Dynam retracts were (?) especially notorious - I found (and others) - mostly, cause was sloppy applying of grease on drive shaft - and end microswitches were dirty - INOP until thorough cleaning and than very carefully re-applying very small amount of grease .. Sure, it is not expected from (every) buyer to perform "surgery" like this - but like said - better check and do what is needed than sorry .. Claiming a warranty is first option - but sometime it is more cumbersome than just fix (if you can..)
Awesome build commentary, Jon. I had a P-47 and it was a BEAR to get put together well. Their airframe designer is... brain-damaged? Head injury? I don't know. They LOOK and FLY really well, however. For what they are, they are over-priced.
it's a good thing they do fly well and look good - tho, if you catch this weeks video coming tomorrow you will see the nuttiest take off yet with this plane.
@@warbuzzard7167 Every airframe has a thrust angle, even if it's neutral. May be easy to "counterdict", but will require more than changing props and reversing ESC wires, which was my point. No one said it was rocket science. Making the changes as you indicated without taking other things into consideration can fix one problem but cause others, not giving you the desired result. That's all.
@@DiscoverRC now much better, I have been looking for counter rotating props, I have only be able to find one set 10x7-3. And the are the thin bladed props instead of the wide belly props that are on war bird, but a pusher prop in that style of prop I believe would cure a bunch of the problem, I noticed Bobby K taking it off and he did not seem to have that problem, wonder if he has a magic mix.🤔🤔🤔. But next to the 1.5 mustang, it has a bad p factor for sure
@@boss2234 I've had one take-off where I've managed to track it straight. Otherwise, I correct the left pull, things look good and then suddenly it wants to wildly swing right before I can catch it. Single engine taildraggers are easy compared to this thing.
absolutely pain in azz to build...ha ha...no idea where any thing electrical can go....play it by ear !!!...cant even access receiver or adjust tail feather servos without pulling wing or some modifications !!!....its a challenge to build..but FUN !!!!
Развлечения
![Cordae - Saturday Mornings (feat. Lil Wayne) [Official Music Video]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/z2GYJua09F0/mqdefault.jpg)
Great video my friend. Big salute from Slovenia, Pilot Robert
very informative and helpful. Havnt pulled the trigger yet but close. Thanks
Thanks for the information….great video….I admire Dynam…even though the builds are a pain….they make the most interesting planes that you can’t find anywhere else…hint hint….thanks again guys.
Yep I like that they do unusual planes. But man they can be a pain to put together lol
Thanks. Great Video. Lookng at buying one of these, Will use ur video to put it together.
Looks really good for a Dynam 👍🏻
you do end up with a good looking model
Enjoyed the build video. Never 🛑
thanks Daren - never stop!
Its a great looking plane. I think we have all had kits like this .. Y'know felt like no one tested the darn thing for fit before sending it out to sell. Nothing quite fits right and a lot of the build is a struggle. Oh yes been there . done that. Thanks for sharing Jon.
part of the hobby we all run into at some point.
I have a love/hate relationship with Dynam. I think everyone who has had the "pleasure" of owning one had that moment of clarity just before throwing tools across the room. I like the planes, I really do! But good gravy... the build.
lol yes another thing you need is patience and knowing when to just put it away for a while and come back later.
Cool. I picked one of these up for a steal at $50 flown once at the swap meet. Have not set it up yet on the radio so this should help.
have fun with it - I had the worst take off with it today and almost killed it.
Good job
Great tips for any builder. I like Dynam because I get to tinker with whatever model it may be. Sometimes you just want to work on something, preferably a plane. AirHammer out
arfs have changed a lot over the years
👍👍😊 Nice to see this model up close.. And great tips !
Not just for this model - no factory line is perfect - better to check everything than just trust and be sorry ..
Dynam retracts were (?) especially notorious - I found (and others) - mostly, cause was sloppy applying of grease on drive shaft - and end microswitches were dirty - INOP until thorough cleaning and than very carefully re-applying very small amount of grease ..
Sure, it is not expected from (every) buyer to perform "surgery" like this - but like said - better check and do what is needed than sorry ..
Claiming a warranty is first option - but sometime it is more cumbersome than just fix (if you can..)
very true - I had a prop fly off an e-flite p-51 because I trusted it was tightened correctly from the factory. nope, not at all.
Very nice 👍👍
So many tips!
nothing on inav sorry
Dynam. Hmmm, are you okay? LOL
looks at the ground...sort of
It might be a pain but it's an impressive plane I think!
it's a cool plane but the take-offs are really messing with me - this weeks was the most bizarre take-off I've ever had lol
where the heck does the Piton tube go ???? cant see it in any videos !!! thanks
Why is the rotation of the motors the same? Why not just reverse one motor and change the prop? Seems logical...yes?
Awesome build commentary, Jon. I had a P-47 and it was a BEAR to get put together well. Their airframe designer is... brain-damaged? Head injury? I don't know. They LOOK and FLY really well, however. For what they are, they are over-priced.
it's a good thing they do fly well and look good - tho, if you catch this weeks video coming tomorrow you will see the nuttiest take off yet with this plane.
Dynam planes come stopped. Up to us to #NSTRC and make it right. 😅
LOL.
you missed me almost killing it today, but Mikey filmed it.
@@DiscoverRC needs to be Freewing/Flightline...BUT comes with a price I guess. 🤷♂️
How hard would it really be to modify for counter rotation?
Steve..help him fix'd it please
You Need To Just Change The Props To Counter Rotate, One Left & One Right, Plus Switch A Couple ESC Leads, A Pretty Simple Fix! 😎
@@grumpyjohntxredneckrc6346 Except that the thrust angles on the motor mounts are not setup for counter rotation.
@@shelbyseelbach9568 I'd suspect that there's no thrust angle on that airframe. Maybe I'm wrong. Not rocket-science to counterdict, though.
@@warbuzzard7167 Every airframe has a thrust angle, even if it's neutral. May be easy to "counterdict", but will require more than changing props and reversing ESC wires, which was my point. No one said it was rocket science. Making the changes as you indicated without taking other things into consideration can fix one problem but cause others, not giving you the desired result. That's all.
Very Nice L@@Kin Plane w/Great Details! Butt It's A Dynam... 🤣 Thanks Jon #NeverStopTheRC
Hey John, yep I know lol
I have detailed mine out looks good but my rudders are not very responsive.🧐
how are your take-offs? I can't tame it yet.
@@DiscoverRC now much better, I have been looking for counter rotating props, I have only be able to find one set 10x7-3. And the are the thin bladed props instead of the wide belly props that are on war bird, but a pusher prop in that style of prop I believe would cure a bunch of the problem, I noticed Bobby K taking it off and he did not seem to have that problem, wonder if he has a magic mix.🤔🤔🤔. But next to the 1.5 mustang, it has a bad p factor for sure
@@boss2234 I've had one take-off where I've managed to track it straight. Otherwise, I correct the left pull, things look good and then suddenly it wants to wildly swing right before I can catch it. Single engine taildraggers are easy compared to this thing.
Non-counter rotating props seems like a bad design choice to me.
Agreed. Probably afraid that the extra cost in making a second prop and training their employees wasn't worth the squeeze.
I wish they were - had the wonkiest take off ever today and almost killed the darn plane.
@@DiscoverRC Jon, you should refit the kit and make the props both turn inward. You're great modeler, you can do it.
absolutely pain in azz to build...ha ha...no idea where any thing electrical can go....play it by ear !!!...cant even access receiver or adjust tail feather servos without pulling wing or some modifications !!!....its a challenge to build..but FUN !!!!