The Difference Between 2000 and 2200 ELO In Chess
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 17 мар 2024
- GoodknightChess's version!
• I challenged a Nationa...
My Opponent's Channel:
@GoodKnightChess
👉🏽 Say hello to 1500 ELO 📈
chessvibescourses.thinkific.c...
😎 Play Chess Here:
www.chess.com/membership?ref_...
👚 Merch: Chessvibes.shop
Links are affiliate links and help support the Chess Vibes channel via a commission.
Thanks for the opportunity man, I really appreciate💪🏾
I really appreciate your thought process, too!
I am impressed by the sportsmanship in this series
Too bad the internet issue with wasting time on your part after you made your move happened multiple times.
What happened man, why you lost on time?
@@NJDJ1986Do you have a mental deficiency?
REMATCH, REMATCH, REMATCH
The difference between 2000 and 2200:
The 2200 can buy better internet connection
Difference between USA and Nigeria.
The 2200 can get an extra N and an extra M in their name
@@Idiot_IndiansThey have smart people though it seems. Bad governance really ruins these countries :(
20:41 Proudest moment😂😂😂
I personally admired 44:53 the most. Fearless.
Qb3 was a good move, otherwise the position would be pretty gruesome, but is there something wrong with black responding Rb8 Qc3 or Qd3, Bxf3 Nxf3, Nxf3 Qxf3, Bxc1 Rxc1 and Rxb2 winning a pawn?
It was at that moment I realized you were far better than me.
Starlink?
@@RandomGuyOnRUclips601not as far as I can see, well spotted. It might be better to play Nxf3 instead because if Bxf3 the sequence could go: Rb8 Qc3 Bxf3 Nxf3 Nxf3 gxf3 and if Bxc1 there's Rxc1 piling pressure on the c-file's weak pawns.
However, if Nxf3 first Black keeps the bishop pair after gxf3 and can play Bd7 defending c6 and having opened the king.
Wait no, I just realized after Rb8 Qc3 Bxf3 Nxf3 Nxf3 Qxf3 Bxc1 Rxc1 Rxb2 there's Rxc6 I think☠️☠️
@@absolutesonic4266 Oh, yeah... Might be as I remember it. I am not going back to the video.
He is somehow underrated because of his internet connection.
I loved this video. I will try to express why:
One - its not clickbaity, its not about Magnus or other chess personality.
Two - it gives us insight on how you both calculate, how you decide between different moves which all seem good to me.
Three- the fact that both players recorded and you edited and show both sides is great. Its like watching a game with comentary, but not from outsiders but the players themselves.
So im just liking and subscribing
I play a lot on mobile data and that “I made my move whys my time going down” is so painful and relatable 😣
Fax 💩
Bro 😭😭😭
I would like to see a rematch
Was a interesting video for sure
The common opinion here is a rematch!
This one deserves a rematch for sure 👏
I’m calling for a rematch or another match against a 1750+ player. On the recaps if we can display the bar that shows who is winning too. Great game by both. Nelson I thought you were for sure finished down so much time and the fight you showed pivoting to quicker plays was incredible.
We need more of this, very instructive!
I enjoy this kind of videos a lot, keep going !!
I really enjoyed hearing him think out cojunter attacks to your attacks. Really helpful to watch. IMHO do more of these with Goodnight chess.
love this videos, keep them going!
Nooo F in the chat for the internet connection, rematch?
Really enjoyed the commentary on both sides
It felt like he was terrified since the start, had he played with confidence the game could have been much more challenging. It was still interesting though...being a 1700 myself i could see the flaws in my thought process. Thanks for such amazing content Nelson. ❤❤
Nah the game was far from over
I think there will be a rematch
Cool video seeing both peoples thought process during a game
I hope you both come back to this when you can. Would really like to see you 2 analyze this one.
we need more videos like this ❤❤
Awesome move by move thought process!!!
Love your videos
At 16:10 I was thinking knight h4 then queen d7, sac the bishop to h3, when pawn takes take back the pawn with the queen, threatening mate with the next move being queen to d2. Makes it very hard for white to deal with and coordinate a response, they would have to see the attack right at the bishop sac or it would be too late. All of his pieces are on the other side of the board undeveloped. Wonder what you think about this idea
Meet again and play out the last position before the disconnection. It was a really nice game and the game could have went either way
In theory, but Nelson already gave away some things he was planning to do next, and either player could've looked at an engine to see the best moves to continue.
Good game. Would have liked to see it play out. But more than that, I would love to see a game where an opponent actually attacks rather than defends the entire game.
I love your this type of videos to watch😅
That was cool game! Please recreate and finish it, I wonder what with that white rook.
So unfortunate with the connection and (partially resulting) time problems. Would be awesome to see a rematch one day if you both are up for it! :)
such a good game, thank you both for good chess content! ... despite the surprise ending
200 points.
😂😂
275
I was rooting for both of you so the outcome works for me. I almost jumped up when he went ahead with the queen sacrifice. The whole time I was like, "do it, do it, do it "
Play unranked and set that position up with similar time when good knight has a better connection, very entertaining game
OK this is a really tough opponent
Nelson loses ~15-20% of the time against this rating range
I wonder why Nelson didn’t consider …Bb4 instead of …Bg5. It’s a better version of the same idea, in that it not only attacks the knight on d2 but pins it to the rook on e1. Thus, for instance, White’s response in the game (Qb3) is unavailable because Black takes on f3 (probably with the bishop) and the d2 knight can’t recapture due to the pin. Weird blind spot?
Edit: just saw that Nelson covered this in the postgame review.
He did move but the timer kept counting down looked like IIs
i've already made my move ... famous last words
Good game, i wish the internet didn't fail to see the outcome. I would've taken the exchange with the queen as well.
Such an anticlimax 😢
At 41 minutes, white has knight takes d5
Great, level game. Too bad about the bad connection.
Yo guys what do you think would happen if when queen qb3 -> f6 ?
Whats the difference between a 2100 and a 2200? 🤔
I have heard that from 2000 and 2200 is a major gap. However, I do not hear much about 2100 to 2200 in chess. Anyways, this video is great and I learned a lot; this will help with my OTB games too!
There's very little difference between a 2100 and a 2200 truth be told, and this guy is probably underrated because of his connection issues. The only major difference is between the top elite level and the rest. I believe that anyone can reach Nelson's level with diligent study.
@@danielward7008 fax
Aww that was unfortunate, Goodknight Chess lost on time, the game would have kept going if he didnt run out of time!
In an E-sport, equipment failure is absolutely part of the sport but a tough way to go out
Next time no time limit so you can finish the game and take the time to explain the moves from both perspectives
That would be like a 2 hr video
My goat!!!
Love to see 2100 Vs 2200 because I'm 2100 and it would be very cool or maybe 2400 vs 2200
You get to see the 2400 vs 2200 in Titled Tuesday, Nelson got killed
@@DanielSong39where I can watch
@@yomanyomandx5609Once in a while Nelson does a RUclips livestream for Titled Tuesday
Rematch Nelson
Nice game, both sides.
ruy lopez against lopez xD
46:25 Third world problem? (several times?)
The Difference Between ....
hell yeah
Im 1900, and I want to challenge you. But only if I am in my mental equilibrium since I am careless when im not in my mental equilibrium
I'm 1700 and I'd like to play a rapid game against you sometime so I can improve. Would you mind adding me so we could play a game? (AbsoluteChess72)
@@absolutesonic4266 ey bro. I dropped from 2040 to 1850 so we are in the same level.
And heres some advice. Act like you are Magnus Carlsen. Commentate by yourself, yeah literally. Like you are a streamer. To improve.
If you lose 2 games. DONT RAGE AND KEEP CALM. THOUGH EASIER SAID THAN DONE.
Analyze them. If you blundered or if you missed a win. That does not mean you are terrible.
That means you are not *Focused*
My username Is Mellocrackowed fyi
rematch
I wanna play you bro I'm 840 elo
Me to I'm 9points higher tho
I’m 550 points higher.
@@tianlecheng2656 I'm now 49 point higher
Can you play a game with Gotham chess?
🎉🎉🎉
More of this yes yes
I like cold milk.
I like warm milk
notification gang
First 🥇🥇🥇🥇🥇🥇🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆😅😅
I'm puzzled how persistent is the goal for settling pawns in the center of the board. Literally every game revolves around such aim, as if pawns were to deliver checkmate. Tired of this pointless approach, so discouraging at fueling some interest for the game.
Having a strong center means more space, more space means more piece mobility, more piece mobility means chances for an attack and a chance to seize the initiative and call the shots i.e your opponent would have to respond to your moves as opposed to making their having time for their own plans and trying to execute them.
Of course the opponent isn't just going to sit back and let you get all that hence the struggle which sometimes clouds the benefits of having a strong center. But if you were to see a game between a strong opponent and a much lower rated one who has no idea why they should fight for the center or how to go about it, most of the things I mentioned above would be demonstrated clearly.
try playing a game against a strong opponent without trying to control the center with pawns or pieces at some point; you will get crushed.
Your argument is like saying that players should be less materialistic and stop caring about the "arbitrary" point system (3 points for bishops, knights, etc.), since chess is about checkmate and not points. But the argument often falls flat since sacrificing a queen for 2 minor pieces will most often give you more limited options and less chances to win the game. Even if chess principles are not written in the rules, they arise naturally and have to be understood to master the game
Try it. :)
It does kinda suck and take away from some of the creativity of the game, but if you don’t do it your opponent will forcing the game to always go a certain way. There still is a lot of room for interesting and fun middle games with a lot of tactics and free thinking strategy. “Opening studies” has partially ruined the game though
@chessvlogger