First leaked Geekbench score for M1 Ultra came out just now: 24055. We'll have to see what that means for more intensive multicore tasks. Did you order a Mac Studio? What was the most exciting part of the event?!
Got a bit of a chuckle from CNET's blurb on Intel's latest and greatest: "The most extreme example of this advanced packaging is Intel's Ponte Vecchio processor, which combines separate chiplets for processing, graphics and memory into a mammoth device with more than 100 billion transistors. Ponte Vecchio's number crunching and AI prowess is designed for the Aurora supercomputer..." Meanwhile, Apple just put 114 billion transistors into a mini desktop that you can order today.
I have some clarification and engineering details for you that you might have missed. The M1 Ultra is NOT two separate chips joined together. They were designed and produced on the same wafer die which includes the “Ultra Fusion” connection. From a manufacturing standpoint the ultra would have been the primary chip produced and the Max chips were binned and cut from these wafers. We seen this chip last due to manufacturing delays and all the disposed dies due to the process of making 5nm. The crazy part about all this is. Intels interweave technology between chips is only good for 10.4 gb/s and AMDs theoretical bandwidth using similar technology is capped at 20 gb/s. The fact that Apple got the bandwidth up to 2.5 tb/s is INSANE and should not theoretically even be possible with our current technology. Lastly the Max chip in the studio will out perform the Max in the MBP. Simply due to thermals, the fans they have put on these chips in the studio should allow them to go above and beyond what we’ve already seen. Exciting times are ahead. The Mac Pro is going to be ludicrous just because they can make it. I firmly believe they are rubbing this in intel’s face as hard as they can.
Apple themselves said that they fused two M1 Max chips together. Creating a chip with that kind of footprint from a single diode wafer is impossible. I'm afraid that you might have misread some information.
@@petrifiedmach Please review the M1 Ultra presentation portion from Johny Srouji. “The leading approach is to use two chips and connect them via the motherboard. However, that approach has significant tradeoffs including increased latency, reduced bandwidth and much higher power consumption.” -Johny Srouji Then he proceeds to spin exactly what I said the first time, except in common language and marketing hype. It’s literally two chips designed on a die with a silicon bridge, which is designed in during the engineering of the chip stage and not a part of the manufacturing phase aka replication waste. Basically Apple took a possibility of designing the silicon around the chip and interweaving it within the chip to create the “UltraFusion”, the portion in which would have been recycled anyways. Not all chips will meet QA or testing requirements, which then these would be salvaged by binning and disabling portions of the chip further creating the M1 “Max” chip.
When you get your hands on a Studio display, you should compare it to an early 2000s studio display.
2 года назад+91
I was waiting this video! I don't like to see so accurate leaks (I like to be "sorprised" by Apple) but you nail it. What a fascinatingly future for M2!
M2 is going to be weaker than M1 Pro but okay. That can of course be fascinating in its own way.
2 года назад+3
@@chrispoulsen_ probably, they still have to keep selling every year, same as every iPhone release but not all people update following that cycle. Some will see an affordable MB Air M2 very attractive. Apple is given a lot of work to Intel and AMD.
The thing is he was completely wrong with all his "leaks" for the past 2 years as he was predicting a new 27" silicon iMac (which never happened and the entire 27" lineup was discontinued) and had no mention of the Studio or the monitor until yesterday.
You have to remember that putting a chip into a laptop and a desktop are very different. In laptop they only have very small cooling and stuff, and because of that they eat very little wattage. But in a desktop, with way better cooling, they can eat as much power as they want, and that mean it will be more powerful when in a desktop.
Also worth remembering Apple doesn't throttle the new MBPs on battery, so the performance envelope cannot unduly impact battery life. Luke's own videos already show how the M1 Max drains the battery when compared to the M1 Pro. No point squeezing more power out of the chip for the battery to go in 2 hours.
The cooling systems in the 14" and 16" MacBook Pros were largely overbuilt for the M1 Pro & Max, you couldn't even hear the fan even in intensive workloads, even the 14" MBP with M1 Max didn't get that loud. However, the M1 Max totally *can* compete with the 10-core i5-12600K, and desktop RTX 3060 Ti. 4:19 It's been pointed out that Cinebench R23 isn't a great benchmark to fully saturate and show the capabilities of the M1's cores. Cinebench's CPU renderer is Intel Embree which is specifically optimized for Intel's AVX2 SIMD with a not so great port to the ARM NEON SIMD. Andrei F. formerly from Anandtech had reported that the base M1 only draws 3.8W in the single core test, which is definitely less than you'd expect, which is in the 5-6.5W range per core. I would suggest you to look at M1 Max' SPECint2017 scores instead, it beats a Ryzen 7 5800X there. 7:21 Most reviewers "benchmark" the M1 Max with Rosetta bottlenecked, non-Metal optimized applications, and workflows that aren't popular on the Mac platform. If you actually look at a benchmark that is close to fully taking advantage of Metal and Apple's TBDR pipeline (e.g GFXBench), you'll see that Apple is putting out higher scores than a desktop RTX 3060.
The price of the studio display makes me really happy about my 24 inch M1 iMac because the 5k screen and keyboard, speakers, mouse & camera for about the same price
"I think I did a great job with the leaks I [repeated] yesterday" … I think Apple did an amazing job keeping this under wraps until a day before the launch event. How does that even happen given last few years of product leaks being spot on weeks out from launch events?
I've now been using the Studio Display for about a month. Yes it's overpriced with middling specs but its impact far exceeds its numbers. Hard to define but its bright, crisp display is so much easier on my eyes than the 4K 27" Samsung I've been using for the last year. The speakers sound great and the auto tilt/pan camera is actually pretty useful. But the total package just works; I get non-stop enjoyment using it that I just never experienced with my old monitor. Count me as a very happy Apple Studio Display customer.
This last year or so since M1 is the first time I have been pleased with the direction Apple has taken with Mac in about a decade. Reminds me of the good old days when they first switched to Intel and all their products got way more powerful and functional and in many cases more affordable all at the same time.
I think a big component people are missing is how much better the cooling will be in the studio. With more volumetric space and better cooling, it should be enough to give an edge in performance over the same chip in the Macbook Pro. Their performance figures make sense to me. Got to wait for official benchmarks tho.
Luke, you are entitled to prediction kudos. Well done 👏 And I’ve been waiting for this M1 update to commit $ on an Mac upgrade - still maybe I should wait for the user tests and not let the marketing hype influence me. It’s even more costly than I expected for Apple. At AU$6,099 base price here in Australia for the M1 Ultra - that’s a lot before you start speccing it up. There are several cars on the market, Mitsubishi, Kia and MG 3 that brand new drive away are only 2.5x to 3x that price.
Have an M1 MacBook Pro, not even a shiny one. I got the base model. I do alot of CPU intensive and GPU intensive tasks that sometimes took days on my previous computers like hashing, security auditing, and even wireless penetration testing, I play War Thunder on it, and the battery lasts pretty much all damn day at max brightness all the time. They are worth the money. My MacBook was worth every penny.
@@LastGunslingerTull thanks for your experience. I have been close to pulling the trigger on an M1 MacBook Pro or the higher end Mac Mini (as I have a 32” 4K monitor for photo and video editing I could use either). I’ve got an old Intel i7 16GB RAM MacBook Pro but it struggles now with Lightroom (photos) and DaVinci Resolve (video) and really really struggles with World of Tanks (so have a PC for gaming, easy as). I guess I want to compare if it’s worthwhile going down the path of this new M1 Ultra chipset Mac (which appears to be way way more powerful) or will the current M1 in either a MacBook or Mini be ok and comfortable enough for the next few interations of Lightroom and DaVinci Resolve. When I buy a new Mac I find I get a lot of reliable years out of them so long as it’s high end spec when I get it Price of the Mac Studio is on a different planet of course !!!!
@@shred3005Hi! I’ve had a few MacBooks recently. Very circumstantial due to work and switching jobs. I had a 16gb until i7 6-core MBP from 2018. They keyboard always broke and had it replaced three times. I was eager to get the, then “next gen MBP”. Instead, the MacBook Air was released and I purchased the baseline 8gb model. It was incredible, portable, and more powerful than my previous MBP. I couldn’t believe it. I intended to give this to family as sometimes I would max out the ram. If you get the Air, make sure you upgrade your RAM. Also, you’ll need a high end dongle to do anything worthwhile with photos and videos. My previous job owed me a computer so I got the baseline MBP 14” the day it was released. I waited for this computer for several years! It’s entirely exceeded ALL my expectations. To this day I still haven’t heard the fan. It’s honestly, entirely overkill for what I need. If your MBP is pretty old, you won’t believe what the Air the Mini could do for you. If you want to splurge get the MBP baseline!
@@whatispizza thank you. Have you used you MacBook Pro with a 4K or 5K monitor? If so, does it handle it ok? I’m confident that since M1 chipset even the Air with 8 core GPU and 16GB RAM or MacBook Pro 13” with 16GB RAM would handle Lightroom so easily and even DaVinci Resolve ok. But I do like to plug my old MacBook Pro into my 32” 4K monitor for photo and video editing. It struggles there. That seems crazy the base Air can do so much as in the past I’ve always bought about the most powerful MacBook Pro you buy because it future proofs you for a while as over time you need more and more grunt to handle the latest software versions, higher and higher resolution images and video and bigger and bigger file sizes. The Mac Studio costs but it would drive a 4K monitor in it’s sleep, no problem and have future proof power for years but that locks me to a static system. Your recommendation of Air or Pro gives that mobile laptop flexibility so long as it can handle driving a separate 4K screen without blinking.
Hi @@shred3005, I have used both baseline Air and baseline Pro 14" on two monitors. One is a 27" 5K and the other is a 32" curved ultrawide 4k. Both machines could handle with no issue at all. The Air is limited to one external display, the Pro can handle several. The portability of the Air is insane. It's unlike anything I've ever experienced. A weekend trip with no charger...mind blown. I would also suspect that you'd be able to use the Pro for more years than the Air.
The maxed out M1 mac mini already works very well for most music recording projects . . . the base model Mac Studio with upgraded storage to 1TB or 2TB shall be the perfect workhorse for the very most music/video projects. The new Studio Display is nice to have, but you could get away with a very decent monitor for half the price + slightly larger too. Most serious studios have very good webcams and speakers already. Else, throw in couple of the HomePod mini speakers and that shall be much better option for all its features including the sound and customized colors/placements. Looking forward for your detail analysis. Thanks for spending the hefty money for us. :)
Hence the monitor is sold separately… or you go spend $5000 on the Xdr 32” The studio display is not targeting movie studios. They are targeting people who need the monitor to have a camera for video conferencing and speakers to sample their content creation.
With the standard M1 Mac Mini I'm struggling when putting plugins in the mastering process, the Mac get too slow with Izotope plugins, I guess an ultra max could sove those issues
You know, as much as I want the M1 MBP for music production, there's a silly temptation to wait and see what Apple will offer, and if they are going to replace the M1 MBP, hopefully it comes at a good price (whatever "good price" means)?
Me hearing a tech reviewer say he dropped $10K on tech: 😬 Me hearing a car reviewer say he drop $20K on a used car: 😁 Love the show and congrats on your scoop. I hope it drives more subscribers to your channel.
I had a 27" Mid-2012 iMac for a decade. It's been replaced with an M1 Mac Mini -- now on a 27" Samsung 4K monitor ($500) with an external USB powered speaker ($100) and no camera. It's a "just okay" combination. I will be ordering the new Studio Display announced today to work with my current M1 Mac Mini now, and eventually I'll get a low-end Mac Studio. I expect the Studio Display will remain usable for 12+ more years, allowing me to purchase maybe 3-4 new computers as they're introduced. This is brilliant marketing on Apple's part and it's a new take on a "modular" computer. Sell a kick-ass monitor that'll be kept for a decade or more, then sell multiple computers as accessories to keep the monitor relevant. Apple, take my money!!!
I had a 32" Samsung 4k monitor on my m1 Mac mini, and yeah I agree.. it was okay.. I sold the Mac mini, and I'll be looking to sell the monitor too bc I picked up the MBP 14", and this studio display is quite tempting.. Im waiting for WWDC tho, just incase there's a chance we see a higher end Mini-LED 32" 120HZ display.
A base model Mac Studio and Studio Display + KB&M is $3899. There's still a massive gap in the lineup where the stock 27" iMac used to be. I really wish there was an M1 Pro Mac Studio or Mac Mini with 16GB RAM and 512GB storage around the $1299 point.
I want to see the inside of the Studio, hopefully there is a way to clean out the dust that gets sucked in over time. The display should have 120hz for that price. Nice job on the leak Luke.
Great video. Idk Luke, Apple is not the company constantly lying and inflating their numbers. Also, many, many tech experts pointed out the current benchmark testing processes were unprepared to correctly measure SOC performance. Didn’t Geekbench acknowledge they needed to update their own testing equipment to measure M1 Pro/Max performance correctly?
Indeed. 4:19 It's been pointed out that Cinebench R23 isn't a great benchmark to fully saturate and show the capabilities of the M1's cores. Cinebench's CPU renderer is Intel Embree which is specifically optimized for Intel's AVX2 SIMD with a not so great port to the ARM NEON SIMD. Andrei F. formerly from Anandtech had reported that the base M1 only draws 3.8W in the single core test, which is definitely less than you'd expect, which is in the 5-6.5W range per core. I would suggest you to look at M1 Max' SPECint2017 scores instead, it beats a Ryzen 7 5800X there. 7:21 Most reviewers "benchmark" the M1 Max with Rosetta bottlenecked, non-Metal optimized applications, and workflows that aren't popular on the Mac platform. If you actually look at a benchmark that is close to fully taking advantage of Metal and Apple's TBDR pipeline (e.g GFXBench), you'll see that Apple is putting out higher scores than a desktop RTX 3060.
I really don't like the way apple do product presentations anymore. The old steve jobs with his ultra simple keynote and an engaging conversation is all i want. Give me the specs, show me some cool pictures of the insides and the design. If it does some cool new shit, show it off. That's about all i want to see. I don't like all the bloat and the 10 different people that all need to be from a different continent. Steve jobs knew how to do it. They're just products. There's no need to try and make it into a mainstream event.
Agree, it's so cringe watching that show 🤦🏼♂️ I'm also curious to see when they will do an actual live event again with an audience and not this over polished pre-recorded thing....
Nice job on all the leaks! You were virtually spot on! I’ve been enjoying your videos for a while and you hit this one out of the park! Nice work. Can’t wait to see your reviews on the Mac Studio and monitor.
Ok, let's see the rendering performance of the new Blender 3.1 (the Apple Silicon version with Metal rendering option) on the M1Max and M1Ultra! I am curious!
Even with the latest Blender I think Blender's Metal backend is still in its Alpha stages. You're gonna have to wait a little longer to see the actual performance Apple Silicon chips put out.
@@utubekullanicisi Yes, I know that Blender 3.1 is really the first release version of Blender that offers rendering via Metal. But this is also a big step forward on the Mac, as Blender GPU rendering has been inactive on the Mac for a long time due to the problems with OpenCL. The important thing is that Blender, with its now superior features, thus has a secure future on the Mac platform, I am very happy about that! Benchmarks would thus be important for purchase decisions, especially within the Mac family M1 -> M1Pro -> M1Max -> M1Ultra. A comparison with NVidia Linux or Windows systems also makes sense in the meantime. The following are my own benchmarks: Blender Junk Shop Benchmark Desktop System AMD Ryzen 3950X (16/32 core/threads) CPU 37 seconds AMD Ryzen 3950X (16/32 core/threads) with GPU NVidia 2070super 14 seconds MacBookPro 16" M1Pro (16) CPU (10 core) 73 seconds MacBookPro 16" M1Pro (16) GPU (16 core) 48 seconds As you can see, you can achieve quite good results in a Macbook laptop compared to a fairly powerful upper mid-range desktop system. Working with Blender on a modern Mac system is simply getting much faster. And the MBP is mobile and virtually silent, with much lower power consumption! And macOS :) I am curious, how the M1 Ultra will perform in a Mac Studio.
Instead of getting the Studio Display at the beginning, would it be possible to connect it to my iMac (27-inch, Late 2013) and use as display until I can afford the new display???????
Interesting point about that display for UK customers: normally, Apple have a habit of simply changing the ‘$’ to a ‘£’, whatever the exchange rate (apple studio is $1999 and £1999, but at current exchange rates should be about £1550 - bit of a rip-off), but the display starts at £1499 in the UK; they’ve actually adjusted the price so it’s nearer what it should be. I hope that’s something we see happen more!
Apple is probably using very favorable tests as they have done in the past. It is likely the tests are in programs that are well optimized for Apple Silicon. We have seen for the past two years that software optimization makes a huge difference in performance.
No, they're not using heavily optimized apps, they're using testing methodology that is fair for their silicon and the others they're comparing it to. 4:19 It's been pointed out that Cinebench R23 isn't a great benchmark to fully saturate and show the capabilities of the M1's cores. Cinebench's CPU renderer is Intel Embree which is specifically optimized for Intel's AVX2 SIMD with a not so great port to the ARM NEON SIMD. Andrei F. formerly from Anandtech had reported that the base M1 only draws 3.8W in the single core test, which is definitely less than you'd expect, which is in the 5-6.5W range per core. I would suggest you to look at M1 Max' SPECint2017 scores instead, it beats a Ryzen 7 5800X there. 7:21 Most reviewers "benchmark" the M1 Max with Rosetta bottlenecked, non-Metal optimized applications, and workflows that aren't popular on the Mac platform. If you actually look at a benchmark that is close to fully taking advantage of Metal and Apple's TBDR pipeline (e.g GFXBench), you'll see that Apple is putting out higher scores than a desktop RTX 3060.
You were the first place I thought of to see a review of the new mac studio. Congrats! Also, you gave me a scare. I had the video at full screen on my iMac and on the center bottom of the display, a saw this grey artifact! I thought my display was going bad. I had to stop the video and check. It was your mic.
@Luke I don't think you're reading the graphs correctly at 4:07. Apple is just saying that M1 Max consumes 65% less power at that specific moment in time. Clearly the graph is not complete as the 12600K reaches usually in gaming scenarios 120W and the TDP is 150W while the M1 Max clocked 39.7W while running Cinebench.
I’ve watched several “after” vids and none of them have commented on the death of the 27” iMac! At the end of the Apple presentation they stated only one left to update, MacPro. Huh.
I would have recommended ordering any system that gives someone headroom to grow here. If I was ordering the MacStudio with M1 Max CPU, I would go with Apple M1 Max with 10-core CPU, 32-core GPU, 16-core Neural Engine, 64 GB RAM, and 2 or 4 TB SSD. Why? I'm looking to keep this system for 3+ years.
That is not hard to believe due to thermals and active cooling. The fans in the studio seem to take 75% of the internal space. I am assuming when maxed out, the Studio can maintain performance for longer and maybe even at a higher level.
At the end of the event they mentioned that only the Mac Pro is the next one to upgrade to silicon. Do you think the 27" imac wont get replaced? And we will only be left with the 24"?
Thanks for the more objective view. Looking forward to your videos and some actual data. I bought an M1 Pro laptop and felt like it was overkill, but it will be fun to see how the Ultra performs. I think the technology they've used is really impressive.
I’m gonna venture to guess that the M1 Max benchmark against the i5 is within the Mac Studio. The benchmarks previous were in a laptop chassis, and I think that cooling system they were super proud of in the keynote probably has something to do with that performance. I’m not sure though, we’ll see what’s really going on once they start shipping out to people.
The cooling systems in the 14" and 16" MacBook Pros were largely overbuilt for the M1 Pro & Max, you couldn't even hear the fan even in intensive workloads, even the 14" MBP with M1 Max didn't get that loud. By the way, the M1 Max totally *can* compete with the 10-core i5-12600K, and desktop RTX 3060 Ti. 4:19 It's been pointed out that Cinebench R23 isn't a great benchmark to fully saturate and show the capabilities of the M1's cores. Cinebench's CPU renderer is Intel Embree which is specifically optimized for Intel's AVX2 SIMD with a not so great port to the ARM NEON SIMD. Andrei F. formerly from Anandtech had reported that the base M1 only draws 3.8W in the single core test, which is definitely less than you'd expect, which is in the 5-6.5W range per core. I would suggest you to look at M1 Max' SPECint2017 scores instead, it beats a Ryzen 7 5800X there. 7:21 Most reviewers "benchmark" the M1 Max with Rosetta bottlenecked, non-Metal optimized applications, and workflows that aren't popular on the Mac platform. If you actually look at a benchmark that is close to fully taking advantage of Metal and Apple's TBDR pipeline (e.g GFXBench), you'll see that Apple is putting out higher scores than a desktop RTX 3060.
Hey Luke, if you look at the graph comparing the m1 Max to the 12600k, you see that it shows the M1 Max’s peak being less than that of the 12600k. It simply shows that the peak performance of the M1 Max is matched by the 12600k but with a 65% gap in power consumption.
There’s some thing that confuses me a lot about the pricing structure. If you upgrade an M1 Max from 24 to 32 graphics, it’s an extra $200. But if you upgrade an M1 ultra from 48 to 60 for graphics, it’s an extra thousand dollars. But the ultra is just to max chips put together, so why the extra $600, it’s like you’re upgrading five chips from 24 to 32.
Hi Luke, the M1 Max in the MacBook Pro and Mac Studio have different performance levels based on Apple’s data. The MacBook M1 Max can only handle 7 8K ProRes 422 Streams, whereas the Mac Studio M1 Max can handle 9 8K ProRes 422 Streams.
With Studio does that mean the Mini has now effectively been discontinued, or will it be updated later this year? Disappointed that we had no Mini update in this keynote.
I'm most excited about the new iPad Air. I have been in the market for an iPad and was eyeing the iPad Pro for a while. It will be very interesting to see how it perfoms and if it is worth the price.
![Here's why Apple won't let YOU upgrade a Mac Studio [Part 2]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/O7wrf2D-j5g/mqdefault.jpg)
![Here's why Apple won't let YOU upgrade a Mac Studio [Part 2]](/img/tr.png)
First leaked Geekbench score for M1 Ultra came out just now: 24055. We'll have to see what that means for more intensive multicore tasks. Did you order a Mac Studio? What was the most exciting part of the event?!
That’s the 2nd highest geekbench CPU score😮
Geek bench and all that nonsense doesn’t matter compared to real world performance.
@Bob Ross About 1K
M1 Air still worth it?
I don't think the graphs use the intel 12th gen to compare. I think they use the Xeon 16 cores in the Mac Pro to compare.
Got a bit of a chuckle from CNET's blurb on Intel's latest and greatest: "The most extreme example of this advanced packaging is Intel's Ponte Vecchio processor, which combines separate chiplets for processing, graphics and memory into a mammoth device with more than 100 billion transistors. Ponte Vecchio's number crunching and AI prowess is designed for the Aurora supercomputer..."
Meanwhile, Apple just put 114 billion transistors into a mini desktop that you can order today.
Lol
isn't the ponte vecchio a gpu?
@@centrion45 It's a bridge they want to sell you.
@@jpdemer5 ????
I have some clarification and engineering details for you that you might have missed. The M1 Ultra is NOT two separate chips joined together. They were designed and produced on the same wafer die which includes the “Ultra Fusion” connection. From a manufacturing standpoint the ultra would have been the primary chip produced and the Max chips were binned and cut from these wafers. We seen this chip last due to manufacturing delays and all the disposed dies due to the process of making 5nm.
The crazy part about all this is. Intels interweave technology between chips is only good for 10.4 gb/s and AMDs theoretical bandwidth using similar technology is capped at 20 gb/s. The fact that Apple got the bandwidth up to 2.5 tb/s is INSANE and should not theoretically even be possible with our current technology.
Lastly the Max chip in the studio will out perform the Max in the MBP. Simply due to thermals, the fans they have put on these chips in the studio should allow them to go above and beyond what we’ve already seen.
Exciting times are ahead. The Mac Pro is going to be ludicrous just because they can make it. I firmly believe they are rubbing this in intel’s face as hard as they can.
Hi. Might I ask if you're an industry insider ? Do you have relevant links / tweets from an insider?
Apple themselves said that they fused two M1 Max chips together. Creating a chip with that kind of footprint from a single diode wafer is impossible. I'm afraid that you might have misread some information.
@@petrifiedmach obviously Apple not going to say what he said. They'd say it in a way that makes sense for everyone even if it's slightly untrue.
@@bombbossgaming3408 no they wouldn't
@@petrifiedmach Please review the M1 Ultra presentation portion from Johny Srouji. “The leading approach is to use two chips
and connect them via the motherboard. However, that approach
has significant tradeoffs including increased latency, reduced bandwidth and much higher
power consumption.” -Johny Srouji
Then he proceeds to spin exactly what I said the first time, except in common language and marketing hype. It’s literally two chips designed on a die with a silicon bridge, which is designed in during the engineering of the chip stage and not a part of the manufacturing phase aka replication waste. Basically Apple took a possibility of designing the silicon around the chip and interweaving it within the chip to create the “UltraFusion”, the portion in which would have been recycled anyways. Not all chips will meet QA or testing requirements, which then these would be salvaged by binning and disabling portions of the chip further creating the M1 “Max” chip.
Was anybody else disappointed they didn't update the M1 chip in the Mac Minis? I was really hoping for that!
Yeah. Was hoping for both an M2 reveal and an M1 Pro/Max Mini. Not to mention an M2 Air. 😃
Seems like not happening before Apple is done with all of the M1 variations.
You deserve that victory lap. Your videos are always great and well thought out. Keep 'em coming!
When you get your hands on a Studio display, you should compare it to an early 2000s studio display.
I was waiting this video! I don't like to see so accurate leaks (I like to be "sorprised" by Apple) but you nail it. What a fascinatingly future for M2!
Thank you!
M2 is going to be weaker than M1 Pro but okay. That can of course be fascinating in its own way.
@@chrispoulsen_ probably, they still have to keep selling every year, same as every iPhone release but not all people update following that cycle. Some will see an affordable MB Air M2 very attractive. Apple is given a lot of work to Intel and AMD.
The thing is he was completely wrong with all his "leaks" for the past 2 years as he was predicting a new 27" silicon iMac (which never happened and the entire 27" lineup was discontinued) and had no mention of the Studio or the monitor until yesterday.
You have to remember that putting a chip into a laptop and a desktop are very different. In laptop they only have very small cooling and stuff, and because of that they eat very little wattage. But in a desktop, with way better cooling, they can eat as much power as they want, and that mean it will be more powerful when in a desktop.
Also worth remembering Apple doesn't throttle the new MBPs on battery, so the performance envelope cannot unduly impact battery life. Luke's own videos already show how the M1 Max drains the battery when compared to the M1 Pro. No point squeezing more power out of the chip for the battery to go in 2 hours.
The cooling systems in the 14" and 16" MacBook Pros were largely overbuilt for the M1 Pro & Max, you couldn't even hear the fan even in intensive workloads, even the 14" MBP with M1 Max didn't get that loud. However, the M1 Max totally *can* compete with the 10-core i5-12600K, and desktop RTX 3060 Ti.
4:19 It's been pointed out that Cinebench R23 isn't a great benchmark to fully saturate and show the capabilities of the M1's cores. Cinebench's CPU renderer is Intel Embree which is specifically optimized for Intel's AVX2 SIMD with a not so great port to the ARM NEON SIMD. Andrei F. formerly from Anandtech had reported that the base M1 only draws 3.8W in the single core test, which is definitely less than you'd expect, which is in the 5-6.5W range per core. I would suggest you to look at M1 Max' SPECint2017 scores instead, it beats a Ryzen 7 5800X there.
7:21 Most reviewers "benchmark" the M1 Max with Rosetta bottlenecked, non-Metal optimized applications, and workflows that aren't popular on the Mac platform. If you actually look at a benchmark that is close to fully taking advantage of Metal and Apple's TBDR pipeline (e.g GFXBench), you'll see that Apple is putting out higher scores than a desktop RTX 3060.
@@utubekullanicisi thank you for spending so much time and effort writing this comment. I understand it now
Danke!
The price of the studio display makes me really happy about my 24 inch M1 iMac because the 5k screen and keyboard, speakers, mouse & camera for about the same price
"I think I did a great job with the leaks I [repeated] yesterday" …
I think Apple did an amazing job keeping this under wraps until a day before the launch event. How does that even happen given last few years of product leaks being spot on weeks out from launch events?
It was fun watching the stream yesterday haha. Looking forward to the content ahead!
Hell of an exclusive you had, presented perfectly. Great work Luke
Glad you enjoyed it!
I've now been using the Studio Display for about a month. Yes it's overpriced with middling specs but its impact far exceeds its numbers. Hard to define but its bright, crisp display is so much easier on my eyes than the 4K 27" Samsung I've been using for the last year. The speakers sound great and the auto tilt/pan camera is actually pretty useful. But the total package just works; I get non-stop enjoyment using it that I just never experienced with my old monitor. Count me as a very happy Apple Studio Display customer.
Didn't Apple refer to the link between the CPU's is called - ultra fusion!
This last year or so since M1 is the first time I have been pleased with the direction Apple has taken with Mac in about a decade. Reminds me of the good old days when they first switched to Intel and all their products got way more powerful and functional and in many cases more affordable all at the same time.
I have to say, you absolutely nailed it in the leaks. And the renders you and Ian Zelbo made were spot on
I think a big component people are missing is how much better the cooling will be in the studio. With more volumetric space and better cooling, it should be enough to give an edge in performance over the same chip in the Macbook Pro. Their performance figures make sense to me. Got to wait for official benchmarks tho.
Luke, you are entitled to prediction kudos. Well done 👏
And I’ve been waiting for this M1 update to commit $ on an Mac upgrade - still maybe I should wait for the user tests and not let the marketing hype influence me.
It’s even more costly than I expected for Apple. At AU$6,099 base price here in Australia for the M1 Ultra - that’s a lot before you start speccing it up. There are several cars on the market, Mitsubishi, Kia and MG 3 that brand new drive away are only 2.5x to 3x that price.
Have an M1 MacBook Pro, not even a shiny one. I got the base model. I do alot of CPU intensive and GPU intensive tasks that sometimes took days on my previous computers like hashing, security auditing, and even wireless penetration testing, I play War Thunder on it, and the battery lasts pretty much all damn day at max brightness all the time. They are worth the money. My MacBook was worth every penny.
@@LastGunslingerTull thanks for your experience. I have been close to pulling the trigger on an M1 MacBook Pro or the higher end Mac Mini (as I have a 32” 4K monitor for photo and video editing I could use either). I’ve got an old Intel i7 16GB RAM MacBook Pro but it struggles now with Lightroom (photos) and DaVinci Resolve (video) and really really struggles with World of Tanks (so have a PC for gaming, easy as).
I guess I want to compare if it’s worthwhile going down the path of this new M1 Ultra chipset Mac (which appears to be way way more powerful) or will the current M1 in either a MacBook or Mini be ok and comfortable enough for the next few interations of Lightroom and DaVinci Resolve. When I buy a new Mac I find I get a lot of reliable years out of them so long as it’s high end spec when I get it
Price of the Mac Studio is on a different planet of course !!!!
@@shred3005Hi! I’ve had a few MacBooks recently. Very circumstantial due to work and switching jobs. I had a 16gb until i7 6-core MBP from 2018. They keyboard always broke and had it replaced three times. I was eager to get the, then “next gen MBP”. Instead, the MacBook Air was released and I purchased the baseline 8gb model. It was incredible, portable, and more powerful than my previous MBP. I couldn’t believe it. I intended to give this to family as sometimes I would max out the ram. If you get the Air, make sure you upgrade your RAM. Also, you’ll need a high end dongle to do anything worthwhile with photos and videos.
My previous job owed me a computer so I got the baseline MBP 14” the day it was released. I waited for this computer for several years! It’s entirely exceeded ALL my expectations. To this day I still haven’t heard the fan. It’s honestly, entirely overkill for what I need.
If your MBP is pretty old, you won’t believe what the Air the Mini could do for you. If you want to splurge get the MBP baseline!
@@whatispizza thank you. Have you used you MacBook Pro with a 4K or 5K monitor? If so, does it handle it ok?
I’m confident that since M1 chipset even the Air with 8 core GPU and 16GB RAM or MacBook Pro 13” with 16GB RAM would handle Lightroom so easily and even DaVinci Resolve ok. But I do like to plug my old MacBook Pro into my 32” 4K monitor for photo and video editing. It struggles there.
That seems crazy the base Air can do so much as in the past I’ve always bought about the most powerful MacBook Pro you buy because it future proofs you for a while as over time you need more and more grunt to handle the latest software versions, higher and higher resolution images and video and bigger and bigger file sizes.
The Mac Studio costs but it would drive a 4K monitor in it’s sleep, no problem and have future proof power for years but that locks me to a static system. Your recommendation of Air or Pro gives that mobile laptop flexibility so long as it can handle driving a separate 4K screen without blinking.
Hi @@shred3005, I have used both baseline Air and baseline Pro 14" on two monitors. One is a 27" 5K and the other is a 32" curved ultrawide 4k. Both machines could handle with no issue at all.
The Air is limited to one external display, the Pro can handle several. The portability of the Air is insane. It's unlike anything I've ever experienced. A weekend trip with no charger...mind blown. I would also suspect that you'd be able to use the Pro for more years than the Air.
This was the most sane reaction to the event I’ve seen so far. You gained a subscriber, Sir.
The maxed out M1 mac mini already works very well for most music recording projects . . . the base model Mac Studio with upgraded storage to 1TB or 2TB shall be the perfect workhorse for the very most music/video projects. The new Studio Display is nice to have, but you could get away with a very decent monitor for half the price + slightly larger too. Most serious studios have very good webcams and speakers already. Else, throw in couple of the HomePod mini speakers and that shall be much better option for all its features including the sound and customized colors/placements. Looking forward for your detail analysis. Thanks for spending the hefty money for us. :)
Hence the monitor is sold separately… or you go spend $5000 on the Xdr 32”
The studio display is not targeting movie studios. They are targeting people who need the monitor to have a camera for video conferencing and speakers to sample their content creation.
With the standard M1 Mac Mini I'm struggling when putting plugins in the mastering process, the Mac get too slow with Izotope plugins, I guess an ultra max could sove those issues
@@paultnl I do not believe Izotope plug-ins are optimized for M1 yet.
You know, as much as I want the M1 MBP for music production, there's a silly temptation to wait and see what Apple will offer, and if they are going to replace the M1 MBP, hopefully it comes at a good price (whatever "good price" means)?
Reallly? Then Why do my m1 Max 16 inch get too hot when adding some extra plugins
Not only they didn't update the Mac Mini but they raised the price for the basic model here in Spain :/
This is SOOO exciting!!!
I am going to watch the videos, don't worry.
As long as you run some blender tests on that Ultra I will watch them :)
Me hearing a tech reviewer say he dropped $10K on tech: 😬
Me hearing a car reviewer say he drop $20K on a used car: 😁
Love the show and congrats on your scoop. I hope it drives more subscribers to your channel.
I had a 27" Mid-2012 iMac for a decade. It's been replaced with an M1 Mac Mini -- now on a 27" Samsung 4K monitor ($500) with an external USB powered speaker ($100) and no camera. It's a "just okay" combination. I will be ordering the new Studio Display announced today to work with my current M1 Mac Mini now, and eventually I'll get a low-end Mac Studio. I expect the Studio Display will remain usable for 12+ more years, allowing me to purchase maybe 3-4 new computers as they're introduced. This is brilliant marketing on Apple's part and it's a new take on a "modular" computer. Sell a kick-ass monitor that'll be kept for a decade or more, then sell multiple computers as accessories to keep the monitor relevant. Apple, take my money!!!
I had a 32" Samsung 4k monitor on my m1 Mac mini, and yeah I agree.. it was okay.. I sold the Mac mini, and I'll be looking to sell the monitor too bc I picked up the MBP 14", and this studio display is quite tempting.. Im waiting for WWDC tho, just incase there's a chance we see a higher end Mini-LED 32" 120HZ display.
The display is really overpriced. They essentially removed the mac from the 27" iMac while keeping it at almost the same price.
Slightly annoying that the memory ceiling is only 128gb
Keep up the good work Luke 😀 yesterday was fun lol The L squad
Niceeeeeeee
Niceeeeeeee
Wow. This is the replacement for the 27 iMac and it has a starting price of $4000
Expect the iMac and MacPro at the WWDC
We’re their comparisons accurate compared to their previous products, iMac 27 and Mac Pro?
The M1Max in the Studio is running @ higher clocks than in the MacBooks?
A base model Mac Studio and Studio Display + KB&M is $3899. There's still a massive gap in the lineup where the stock 27" iMac used to be. I really wish there was an M1 Pro Mac Studio or Mac Mini with 16GB RAM and 512GB storage around the $1299 point.
I want to see the inside of the Studio, hopefully there is a way to clean out the dust that gets sucked in over time. The display should have 120hz for that price. Nice job on the leak Luke.
I agree, it should have had 120hz and, it should have had Thunderbolt 4 instead of Thunderbolt 3 for that price.
I can’t wait for Benchmarks… leaks were on point… so much Adrenaline watching the event… like m1 ultra can’t wait… Luke’s just the best
You made it Luke - You are a credible leak source now!
Ty for the honest breakdown. Did not have a chance to watch the event today
You may have missed blurring out your zip code on the checkout page in the video
Still no AV1 hardware decoder? Sounds inadequate for release in 2022.
Hey Luke, could you please compare the Mac Studio performance to two Mac Minis attached with super glue?
One thing though.... I understand there is no keyboard with the Mac Mini to keep the price down. But why is there no keyboard and mouse included?
I’m sure you’ve gained a lot of new subs today. Amazing work with the Mac Studio leak, now don’t let us down in the future
1:35 You "predicted" is a little over the top! You "leaked" is a more accurate statement! You have good sources! You were spot on! 👍🏼 Keep it up!
You must have used the force. Luke. Great show.
You got a subscriber bro!! Keep it up
Great video. Idk Luke, Apple is not the company constantly lying and inflating their numbers. Also, many, many tech experts pointed out the current benchmark testing processes were unprepared to correctly measure SOC performance. Didn’t Geekbench acknowledge they needed to update their own testing equipment to measure M1 Pro/Max performance correctly?
GeekBench needs to be updated but Cinebench works perfect and flawlessly. So yeah, Apple is lying about the performance once again.
Indeed.
4:19 It's been pointed out that Cinebench R23 isn't a great benchmark to fully saturate and show the capabilities of the M1's cores. Cinebench's CPU renderer is Intel Embree which is specifically optimized for Intel's AVX2 SIMD with a not so great port to the ARM NEON SIMD. Andrei F. formerly from Anandtech had reported that the base M1 only draws 3.8W in the single core test, which is definitely less than you'd expect, which is in the 5-6.5W range per core. I would suggest you to look at M1 Max' SPECint2017 scores instead, it beats a Ryzen 7 5800X there.
7:21 Most reviewers "benchmark" the M1 Max with Rosetta bottlenecked, non-Metal optimized applications, and workflows that aren't popular on the Mac platform. If you actually look at a benchmark that is close to fully taking advantage of Metal and Apple's TBDR pipeline (e.g GFXBench), you'll see that Apple is putting out higher scores than a desktop RTX 3060.
@@petrifiedmach They're not. Cinebench is not fully saturating the cores. Go away PCMR coomer
@@utubekullanicisi thanks, very informative!
Luke what do you think of the display? The fact it’s not high refresh rate or even 32 inch is kind of silly.
Your victory-lap is well deserved! Minus splitting a few hairs, yeah... You nailed it!! Kudos to you!!!
I really just wanted a mac mini with the m1 pro chip.
I really don't like the way apple do product presentations anymore. The old steve jobs with his ultra simple keynote and an engaging conversation is all i want. Give me the specs, show me some cool pictures of the insides and the design. If it does some cool new shit, show it off. That's about all i want to see. I don't like all the bloat and the 10 different people that all need to be from a different continent. Steve jobs knew how to do it. They're just products. There's no need to try and make it into a mainstream event.
Agree, it's so cringe watching that show 🤦🏼♂️ I'm also curious to see when they will do an actual live event again with an audience and not this over polished pre-recorded thing....
The sign language person was annoying me. Couldn't they just have a subtitles option.
Nice job on all the leaks! You were virtually spot on! I’ve been enjoying your videos for a while and you hit this one out of the park! Nice work. Can’t wait to see your reviews on the Mac Studio and monitor.
Ok, let's see the rendering performance of the new Blender 3.1 (the Apple Silicon version with Metal rendering option) on the M1Max and M1Ultra! I am curious!
throw some prime 95 on it and see how long it lasts 😈
Even with the latest Blender I think Blender's Metal backend is still in its Alpha stages. You're gonna have to wait a little longer to see the actual performance Apple Silicon chips put out.
@@utubekullanicisi Yes, I know that Blender 3.1 is really the first release version of Blender that offers rendering via Metal. But this is also a big step forward on the Mac, as Blender GPU rendering has been inactive on the Mac for a long time due to the problems with OpenCL. The important thing is that Blender, with its now superior features, thus has a secure future on the Mac platform, I am very happy about that!
Benchmarks would thus be important for purchase decisions, especially within the Mac family M1 -> M1Pro -> M1Max -> M1Ultra. A comparison with NVidia Linux or Windows systems also makes sense in the meantime.
The following are my own benchmarks:
Blender Junk Shop Benchmark
Desktop System
AMD Ryzen 3950X (16/32 core/threads) CPU
37 seconds
AMD Ryzen 3950X (16/32 core/threads) with GPU NVidia 2070super
14 seconds
MacBookPro 16" M1Pro (16) CPU (10 core)
73 seconds
MacBookPro 16" M1Pro (16) GPU (16 core)
48 seconds
As you can see, you can achieve quite good results in a Macbook laptop compared to a fairly powerful upper mid-range desktop system. Working with Blender on a modern Mac system is simply getting much faster.
And the MBP is mobile and virtually silent, with much lower power consumption! And macOS :)
I am curious, how the M1 Ultra will perform in a Mac Studio.
You were spot on with those leaks so flex a little.
I was disappointed to see there was no new MacBook Air. Might need to bite the bullet and get the entry
level one.
I never doubted your leak,Luke!
Mac Pro Mini or Mac Mini Pro? Mac Studio doesn’t seem descriptive enough for me
Hyped for the review 😮💨😮💨😮💨
Soooooooo....where is the Mac Mini ???? 👀 Not sure everyone needs a M1 max or Ultra
Instead of getting the Studio Display at the beginning, would it be possible to connect it to my iMac (27-inch, Late 2013) and use as display until I can afford the new display???????
Interesting point about that display for UK customers: normally, Apple have a habit of simply changing the ‘$’ to a ‘£’, whatever the exchange rate (apple studio is $1999 and £1999, but at current exchange rates should be about £1550 - bit of a rip-off), but the display starts at £1499 in the UK; they’ve actually adjusted the price so it’s nearer what it should be. I hope that’s something we see happen more!
I want to see how much better the battery is in the New SE iPhone
Great job on the leaks, Luke. Turned out to be a great event. Watched all the ads for you lol!
Apple is probably using very favorable tests as they have done in the past. It is likely the tests are in programs that are well optimized for Apple Silicon. We have seen for the past two years that software optimization makes a huge difference in performance.
No, they're not using heavily optimized apps, they're using testing methodology that is fair for their silicon and the others they're comparing it to.
4:19 It's been pointed out that Cinebench R23 isn't a great benchmark to fully saturate and show the capabilities of the M1's cores. Cinebench's CPU renderer is Intel Embree which is specifically optimized for Intel's AVX2 SIMD with a not so great port to the ARM NEON SIMD. Andrei F. formerly from Anandtech had reported that the base M1 only draws 3.8W in the single core test, which is definitely less than you'd expect, which is in the 5-6.5W range per core. I would suggest you to look at M1 Max' SPECint2017 scores instead, it beats a Ryzen 7 5800X there.
7:21 Most reviewers "benchmark" the M1 Max with Rosetta bottlenecked, non-Metal optimized applications, and workflows that aren't popular on the Mac platform. If you actually look at a benchmark that is close to fully taking advantage of Metal and Apple's TBDR pipeline (e.g GFXBench), you'll see that Apple is putting out higher scores than a desktop RTX 3060.
You deserve a victory lap on the leaks… I can’t wait to see how the performance of the Ultra stacks up in real life!
"I spent $10,000 USD ... please watch the videos" LOL!
You did a great job with the leaks!
It's a peek at the Mac Pro performance....
I gotta say, I was skeptical as hell but those leaks were on point
How come these ship right away but I order my 14’ mbp in January and it still hasn’t shipped??
You were the first place I thought of to see a review of the new mac studio. Congrats! Also, you gave me a scare. I had the video at full screen on my iMac and on the center bottom of the display, a saw this grey artifact! I thought my display was going bad. I had to stop the video and check. It was your mic.
Can it hold the connection to a bluetooth speaker though?
Can't wait for next week...
@Luke I don't think you're reading the graphs correctly at 4:07. Apple is just saying that M1 Max consumes 65% less power at that specific moment in time. Clearly the graph is not complete as the 12600K reaches usually in gaming scenarios 120W and the TDP is 150W while the M1 Max clocked 39.7W while running Cinebench.
Why don't you stack a few M1 mac minis in order to build a mac studio?
I’ve watched several “after” vids and none of them have commented on the death of the 27” iMac! At the end of the Apple presentation they stated only one left to update, MacPro. Huh.
I would have recommended ordering any system that gives someone headroom to grow here. If I was ordering the MacStudio with M1 Max CPU, I would go with Apple M1 Max with 10-core CPU, 32-core GPU, 16-core Neural Engine, 64 GB RAM, and 2 or 4 TB SSD. Why? I'm looking to keep this system for 3+ years.
never been this early
i'd like to thank luke for his great content and channel
thank you everyone
really good points about Apple's claims of M1 Max being more powerful in Mac Studio than M1 Max in a 16" MBP.
That is not hard to believe due to thermals and active cooling. The fans in the studio seem to take 75% of the internal space. I am assuming when maxed out, the Studio can maintain performance for longer and maybe even at a higher level.
Sad there's still no M1 Pro desktop option for those of us that need more CPU than the M1 but don't need the extra graphics of the Max.
Yep. Can we please get an M1 Pro Mac mini.
Think we'll get an m1 pro Mac mini at some point?
At the end of the event they mentioned that only the Mac Pro is the next one to upgrade to silicon. Do you think the 27" imac wont get replaced? And we will only be left with the 24"?
Thanks for the more objective view. Looking forward to your videos and some actual data. I bought an M1 Pro laptop and felt like it was overkill, but it will be fun to see how the Ultra performs. I think the technology they've used is really impressive.
Do you rate the "peek" refers to the Mac Studio being a sort of teaser for what to expect for the Mac Pro?
Will you return it when you finish reviewing it?
Thank you for the quick video so soon after the event. Looking forward to the videos showcasing the Studio and putting it through its paces!
I purchased my Mac Studio this morning. M1 Pro chip 1TB 32 gb ram. Will be here April 8 week.
I’m gonna venture to guess that the M1 Max benchmark against the i5 is within the Mac Studio. The benchmarks previous were in a laptop chassis, and I think that cooling system they were super proud of in the keynote probably has something to do with that performance. I’m not sure though, we’ll see what’s really going on once they start shipping out to people.
The cooling systems in the 14" and 16" MacBook Pros were largely overbuilt for the M1 Pro & Max, you couldn't even hear the fan even in intensive workloads, even the 14" MBP with M1 Max didn't get that loud. By the way, the M1 Max totally *can* compete with the 10-core i5-12600K, and desktop RTX 3060 Ti.
4:19 It's been pointed out that Cinebench R23 isn't a great benchmark to fully saturate and show the capabilities of the M1's cores. Cinebench's CPU renderer is Intel Embree which is specifically optimized for Intel's AVX2 SIMD with a not so great port to the ARM NEON SIMD. Andrei F. formerly from Anandtech had reported that the base M1 only draws 3.8W in the single core test, which is definitely less than you'd expect, which is in the 5-6.5W range per core. I would suggest you to look at M1 Max' SPECint2017 scores instead, it beats a Ryzen 7 5800X there.
7:21 Most reviewers "benchmark" the M1 Max with Rosetta bottlenecked, non-Metal optimized applications, and workflows that aren't popular on the Mac platform. If you actually look at a benchmark that is close to fully taking advantage of Metal and Apple's TBDR pipeline (e.g GFXBench), you'll see that Apple is putting out higher scores than a desktop RTX 3060.
Think the base model M1Ultra will be ideal for me, filming Davinci Resolve 17 tutorials and editing 4K 10 bit projects for clients
Watching for your analysis!
Hey Luke, if you look at the graph comparing the m1 Max to the 12600k, you see that it shows the M1 Max’s peak being less than that of the 12600k. It simply shows that the peak performance of the M1 Max is matched by the 12600k but with a 65% gap in power consumption.
There’s some thing that confuses me a lot about the pricing structure. If you upgrade an M1 Max from 24 to 32 graphics, it’s an extra $200. But if you upgrade an M1 ultra from 48 to 60 for graphics, it’s an extra thousand dollars. But the ultra is just to max chips put together, so why the extra $600, it’s like you’re upgrading five chips from 24 to 32.
Hi Luke, the M1 Max in the MacBook Pro and Mac Studio have different performance levels based on Apple’s data. The MacBook M1 Max can only handle 7 8K ProRes 422 Streams, whereas the Mac Studio M1 Max can handle 9 8K ProRes 422 Streams.
"please watch the videos" xD Dudeee that killed me.
With Studio does that mean the Mini has now effectively been discontinued, or will it be updated later this year? Disappointed that we had no Mini update in this keynote.
Clearly the Studio is a new product category from Apple, to sit above the Mac mini. It's not a replacement for it.
Congratulations LUKE
Seems like the non binned m1 max mac studio config or base m1 ultra are the better value, looking forward for the review!
Hang in there Luke! whatever you bought its great hardware! Already subscribed.
Great video as usual 🔥 🔥
I'm most excited about the new iPad Air. I have been in the market for an iPad and was eyeing the iPad Pro for a while. It will be very interesting to see how it perfoms and if it is worth the price.
yo same
Can Apple silicon do ray tracing for architectural renderings?
And the base iMac 27 ist now the combination of the studio display with the mac mini, right? 😄