Here is a Sahih tradition of the Imam(عليه السلام) saying Fatima(sa) was a martyr: Muhammad in Yahya has narrated from al-‘Amrakiy ibn Ali from Ali ibn Ja‘far from his brother from abu al-Hassan ((عليه السلام).) who has said the following. “Fatima is truthful and a martyr. Al Kafi, V 1, Kitab al Hujjah, Ch 114, h 2 Allamah Majlisi: صحيح
Deep from inside Shi'a know that Ahlus Sunnah is the Haqq. They are just emotional because they are born in that family of minority. Anyone born has the fitrah that we don't make ourselfs bleed by whip, and we worship Allah alone directly. Without something in between. The mushrik pagans had statue (stone) between them and Allah, big groep of shi'a take dead people in graves as mediator between them and Allah. This is Shirk. No one in AhlusSunnah worships any companion along (not even as mediator) when they worship Allah. Look our Adhaan is authentic, but your adhaan is modified, you added one sentence on the Word of Allah. Do you think Allah makes mistakes? You think adhaan incomplete? How dare you to instult Allah. Allah is Perfect and Adhaan is Perfect, you can take nothing and remove nothing from it. Not even my own father Wollahi. You are welcome as my brother, just follow the Sunnah of the prophet like us ~90%. Pray Directly to Allah without someone in between. May Allah bless them (Shi'a) all with authentic Islam.
@@xtreme6018 Sunni hadith state actual names, practically all Shi'a ones literally say "someone told someone else" at numerous places in it's hadith chains. Allah azzawajjal gave baraqah to Islam that he made your sources blatantly false
I was exposed to Shia. Mostly me challenging them on social media and not losing despite my very lackluster knowledge on issue. The devil brought up doubts in my mind. And then I found this channel. Alhamdulillah!
@@HiHi-ek1dd there is Misunderstanding of my comment, let me clarify: the letter that was used in this Ayah "Kef" not. "Qaf". Alaikum and not Alaiqum. Regarding your comment now "Salaam" is not recommend, it should be "AsSalamu alaikum wa Rahmatullahi wa Barakatuh". But these are details brother, don't worry. I ask you to have the understanding in Arabic before you invite people to discuss otherwise you will waste time of people. Indeed Allah sent the Quran in Arabic, such that we can understand. My native language isn't Arabic. I see first time a Muslim who doesn't know the difference between the letters Kef and Qaf. Why can't you at least read Arabic? Or at least memorized the letters?
What tashhud u recited when u were shia? And tell me something that shias do in 2nd combined namaz that u sunnis don't do let's see if u were a shia even in first place
I am sure you had a lot of questions that you didn't asked. I am a Islamic teacher and many of the kids don't have knowledge and some of them go to sunni mosques because of their sunni friends are going there, but don't know much about the Shia Islam because they don't ask the right people.
2 года назад+57
''The disbelievers say, “If only a sign could be sent down to him from his Lord.” Say, ˹O Prophet,˺ “Indeed, Allah leaves to stray whoever He wills, and guides to Himself whoever turns to Him.' The Noble Qur'an, 13: 27
If the Prophet Muhammad (SAAWS) prophesied that Sayyida Fatima (RAA) would be the first of his relatives to die after him, but the Twelver Imamiyyah Shi’a Rawafidh claim that her unborn son al-Muhsin (or al-Muhassin) was killed in the alleged “attack” upon Fatima al-Zahraa (RAA), aren’t they basically saying that the Prophet (SAAWS) lied or gave a false prophecy?
@@mohameda5947 they believe that al muhsin was the first to die from ahlul bait after the prophet peace and blessings be upon him. But also have a hadith that says that Fatima ra was the first of ahlul bait to die after the prophet PBBUH. This is contradictory
@@Omer1996E.C Assalamulalkum, muslim 44 55 I can send 4 more. I'll send like 6+ prophecy of 12 successors after me, I'll send you many things if you'd like.
Assalam-O-alaikum Brother I love you for the sake of Allah, may Allah bless you, forgive all of your sins, and admit you into the highest place in Jannah Ameen.
@Rilo Saint Phillip uh? Shias and Sunnis don't believe in different Qurans, the only difference is political- real muslims are those who follow the truth, the truth is subjective in this content.
@@M.S10000 You misunderstood the brother, he's saying their fantasy Imam (12th) has the same story as Dajal - meaning he's been alive and in hiding. I mean it's just a guess, it might be that their 12th Imam has nothing to do with Dajal but the resemblance is certainly there. As for the Mahdi (AS) then we are not talking about him, the Shi'a have no right over him, other than fabricated stories.
Why is Othman not from Ahl al-Bayt? I mean, he married two of the Prophet's daughters In fact, he is the only man who married two of the Prophet's daughters Never knew a man had done this before him Even with the prophets who passed away And he also killed in a bad way , in really bad way
Why are you going to Uthman, they even accuse the mother of the believers Aisha RA who was the wife of the prophet. You cant get any closer to ahlu al bayt than that... Abu Bakr was the father in law of the prophet, thats not ahlu al bayt?
Your cult is a joke “A'isha opined/said that adult breast feeding makes an individual mahram and she breastfed a young adult man and he would enter upon her, but the remainder/other mothers of the believers denied it ie being permisible (adult breast feeding) ...” Ref: 'Fatah ul-Mun’im Sharh Sahih Muslim', volume 5, page 622.
@BubbaInTheBasement you couldn't respond to the hadith in your book saying that aisha breastfeed adult men so this is your best response pathetic see how fragile your religion is we can end it in a second by just using your own book's against you and what pagan Jewish saint alhamdulillah shias worship only Allah unlike you who worship a God that is a beardless man with curly hair as your hadiths say and ibn Taymiyyah your scholar authenticated the hadith In al-Tasis fi al-rad ala Asas al-Taqdis, Volume 3 page 214 Ibn Taymiyyah says this: We conclude that it was eyesight as it is in the Sahih narration from Qutada from Ikrama from Ibn Abbas said that the Prophet said I saw my God in the image of a beardless man with long curly hair in a green garden Your Shaykh Ibn Taymiyyah states here that the hadith is Sahih It's authentic. Audhubillah so who is a jew now I know that you won't respond to my comment in a academical logical way since I brought evidence from your books and absolutely obliterated your cult
@BubbaInTheBasement 1. okay what if it Is Google pasting what's the problem that doesn't change the fact that this is In your books 2. You're avoiding the references I provided to you and brushing them aside like it's not important so your religion is this fragile you can't even explain the things in your books and you're instead jumping to my book's alhamdulillah shia Islam is not a fragile religion like yours and we explain the things in our books yes we have a hadith that says nasibis are penetrated at birth I don't see the issue with this hadith of course you people who love the enemies of ahlulbayt insult their followers and believe that a beardless boy is Allah is penetrated by iblees I don't understand how this is something that destroys our religion or whatever it's not like your book's in which Allah is a human and has a body plus you have similar beliefs about others to you make takfir on us and call us fire worshippers and you have similar hadiths in your book's which says similar things about the Christians and Jews so how is it a big issue when similar things exist in your religion as for the hadiths that forbids building shrines we can discuss them bring the hadiths and I will explain it to you
@@ShiaRafidhiAkhbariIslam bro do you really want to get to that level. I can quote hadiths from your books that show Abu talib breastfed the prophet Muhammad ﷺ 😂
Thanks for the sincerity and academic integrity Farid, truly this slanderous libel of the killing of Fatima has no place in Tashayu' and history in general.
Masha Allah nice clip and to all my brothers in comment section who are so much angry. When you step into their shoes you will realise that they have been taught to hate sunnis since child hood. They have set of beliefs on which the try to mold Islam into and this also happens in some sunni sects specially in the sub continent. You would be surprised to listen to their beliefs. In the end guidance is from Allah. May Allah guide them and us all as well. If we don't stick to the book of Allah we will be lost. Jazakallah once again to brother farid
For critical thinkers and rationalists: These sahaba were the great companions of the prophet (peace be upon him). They accompanied him, lived with him and were supporters and associates. No one creates a clash or conflict between the family of the prophet and the companions except innovators who are incapable to draw evidence from the prophet (peace be upon him) himself or his family which is amazing. What is their historic evidence? From an incident striking controversy that happened from the time of the fourth caliphate and nothing prior. According to them, a bunch of nobodies (not approved by the prophet) are their reliable point of reference (same case with the Christians and their authors of the Bible) instead of those who walked with the "walking revelation" and accompanied him (peace be upon him), maintaining their good relationship until his passing. For mythology believers: "the Hadith of ghadir?" It's like, uh were the narrators reliable, were they? They had "an agenda" yet they narrated their own supposed doom did they? Was Ali put as a leader at that period or was that statement in relation to an incident within a context? "12 imams", another similarity with the Christians of inventing things vis-a-vis the trinity, otherwise nowhere to be found except via later innovators, period. "Muawiyah had a fight with Ali" uh, yes, therefore... 12 imams, therefore... ? "the Quran was preserved by Ali and ahlul bayt (including the women) by themselves and transmitted it to the world", *head scratch*, *cough*, but that's physically impossible, especially in those times and they were under the reign of others therefore what do you say about authorisation (?), and how do you account for a unified, precisely consist book accessed across distant lands? Exactly, associates all along from the beginning. The number of companions overwhelm ahlul bayt, had the accusations been true in the slightest by the innovators, there would be no such authentic Scripture.
Yes, reliability is a necessary condition for authenticity and hence preservation. It also demonstrates commitment and truthfulness. If you accept the product, then you concede to the reliability (i.e true believers) of its deliverers. This would also mean that you have to accept their Hadiths too if demonstrated authentic, otherwise you would be guilty of having double standards. Nobody other than the prophets (peace be upon them) are infallible. When you say evil, that could only be in the form of committing ordinary sins that does not affect their truthfulness to Islam otherwise I’m sure you’d agree to the impossibility of a scripture being authentic in its entirety by “evil” people when they are the only ones who first-hand received the revelation from the prophet, making everyone after them dependent on them necessarily. In regards to sins, their good outweigh their mistakes and by virtue of being who they were, they are superior than any people who comes after them as per the prophet’s statements and the Quran. This means that they are removed from “evil”. Moreover, one of the worst yet obvious errors of shias is that they give a blind eye to clear evidence and clear texts which is bewildering and a delusional, pitiful state to be in. It then becomes a purely emotional argument from them that doesn’t allow for the rule of reason and logic which is common with folks of other religions. Some of the virtues of the sahaba: “Allaah knows best with whom to place His Message”. [al-An’aam 6:124] One of the scholars (may Allaah have mercy on him) commented: Allaah knows best where to place His Message, both with regard to the original recipient (the prophet) and those who inherit it from him (his companions). He knows best who is fit to receive His Message and convey it to His slaves in a trustworthy and sincere manner, respecting the Sender and fulfilling his duties towards Him, patiently following His commands and showing gratitude for His blessings and drawing close to Him, and He knows who is not fit for that. Similarly, He knows best who among the nations is fit to be the heirs of His Messengers and to succeed them and convey the Message that they received from their Lord. End quote. Allaah says: “Thus We have tried some of them with others, that they might say: ‘Is it these (poor believers) whom Allaah has favoured from amongst us?’ Does not Allaah know best those who are grateful?” [al-An’aam 6:53] One of the scholars (may Allaah have mercy on him) commented: Those who acknowledge the blessing and affirm it, and who do what it requires of righteous deeds, are the ones on whom Allaah bestows His blessing, to the exclusion of those who are not grateful, for Allaah is wise and He does not place His bounty with one who is not qualified to receive it. Just as there are many verses and ahaadeeth which speak of their virtue and high status, so too there are texts which state the reasons why they deserved this high status, such as the verse in which Allaah says: “Muhammad is the Messenger of Allaah. And those who are with him are severe against the disbelievers (for the general audience: this applies in the context of oppression, see surah al Mumtahanah verse 8 for clarification) and merciful among themselves. You see them bowing and prostrating (in prayer), seeking Bounty from Allaah and (His) Good Pleasure. The mark of them (i.e. of their Faith) is on their faces (foreheads) from the traces of prostration (during prayers). This is their description in the Tawraat (Torah). But their description in the Injeel (Gospel) is like a (sown) seed which sends forth its shoot, then makes it strong, and becomes thick and it stands straight on its stem, delighting the sowers, that He may enrage the disbelievers with them. Allaah has promised those among them who believe (i.e. all those who follow Islamic Monotheism, the religion of Prophet Muhammad till the Day of Resurrection) and do righteous good deeds, forgiveness and a mighty reward (i.e. Paradise)” [al-Fath 48:29] “Indeed, Allaah was pleased with the believers when they gave the Bay‘ah (pledge) to you (O Muhammad) under the tree, He knew what was in their hearts, and He sent down As‑Sakeenah (calmness and tranquillity) upon them, and He rewarded them with a near victory” [al-Fath 48:18] “And the foremost to embrace Islam of the Muhaajiroon and the Ansaar and also those who followed them exactly (in Faith). Allaah is well-pleased with them as they are well-pleased with Him. He has prepared for them Gardens under which rivers flow (Paradise), to dwell therein forever. That is the supreme success” [al-Tawbah 9:100] “Do not revile my companions, for by the One in Whose hand is my soul, if one of you were to spend the equivalent of Uhud in gold, it would not amount to a mudd of one of them, or half of that.” Narrated by al-Bukhaari (3673) and Muslim (2540). The students of knowledge say: Even if there was nothing narrated from Allaah or His Messenger about them, the things that they did such as migrating (hijrah), engaging in jihad (Just war), supporting (the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) and Islam, expending their lives and their wealth, ending their ties (to the extent of war) with their fathers and sons, sincerely following the deen, believing strongly and with certainty, is definitive proof of their good character and sincerity, and shows that they are superior to all those sincere people of good character who come after them, for all time. This is the view of all the scholars, and of the fuqaha’ whose opinion counts. End quote. One of the great scholars (may Allaah have mercy on him) said: Ahl al-Sunnah speak well of them, and pray for mercy and forgiveness for them, but they do not believe that anyone is infallible or that anyone is protected from making mistakes in their ijtihaad except the Messenger of Allaah; it is possible for anyone else to commit sins or make mistakes, but they are as Allaah says: “They are those from whom We shall accept the best of their deeds and overlook their evil deeds. (They shall be) among the dwellers of Paradise ___ a promise of truth, which they have been promised” [al-Ahqaaf 46:16]. The virtue of any deeds is to be judged by the results and consequences. End quote. This is confirmed in the Qur’aan and Sunnah, in more than one place. Allaah forgave those of the Sahaabah who turned back on the day of Uhud, as He says: “Those of you who turned back on the day the two hosts met (i.e. the battle of Uhud), it was Shaytaan (Satan) who caused them to backslide (run away from the battlefield) because of some (sins) they had earned. But Allaah, indeed, has forgiven them. Surely, Allaah is Oft‑Forgiving, Most Forbearing” [Aal ‘Imraan 3:155] And there are other cases in which some of the Sahaabah committed sins, then Allaah, may He be exalted, pardoned them and forgave them, which is indicative of their virtue and honour and that cannot be undermined by any mistake that they made during the time of the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) or after he died. The verses and Hadith quoted above, which speak of their virtue and give them the glad tidings of Paradise, cannot be abrogated by anything. The conclusion is pretty obvious about the sahaba and the aspersions cast upon them are disqualified and invalidated. Allah knows best.
how do u knw this hadith is as same of prophet time??? have u ever studied communication sub tht how news distorted though in early age!! even modern day news r fabricately spread..where america killed 17afghan bcuz of fabricated n wrng news as terror group??? we knw well about mongol n crusador invasion in muslim wrld ..how they burnt the library n books n mosque...how we believe hadith can be authentic which were false attributely to muhammod fr political aim n as well as personal opinions or gain something else like dominence over women...though ppl doubt over quran fr distortion..let alone hadith...bt brimington n saudi n turkey n uzbekistan quran manuscript ensured us fr authenticity of radio carbon date of 99% n allah himself promised us of getting distortion..prophet taught quran mainly, where from 4 companion as well as aisha n hafsa collected n sent to different parts of the wrld...it was spread out as personal note of ppl n culturel n tradition n bigotry n superstition n incomplete narration which anyone can identify
@Isbat UI Kareem Your comment is as poor as your gibberish writing. "Allah himself promised us distortions" ".. Where four companions as well as aisha and hafsa collected n sent it to different parts of the world.. " Ya miskeen. How do we know? Ok, first let me ask you, do you know if your parents are really your parents?
The narration at 17:00 is mistranslated. The original Arabic says, في كل جمعة مرتين: الاثنين، والخميس The translation provided translates the word جمعة as Friday, which is the common usage of the word. However, the way it is written in Arabic (especially using the colon) indicates that جمعة here's means "a week", which is another usage of the word. So the correct translation would be that she visited the graves twice a week: on Mondays and Thursdays
farid just want to clear one thing regarding the second hadith of Rustum , if the chain was sahee but book was not so what will be the ruling of sahih chain and was that hadith somewhere else mentioned bcoz of the sahee chain?
Oh I was waiting for the funny clip at the end I guess you can't make everyone happy and you said that yourself but I am happy anyways the video was great 👍 keep it up
JazakAllah Allah khair for this amazing video! Again absolutely demolished and exposed some of these liars! To me they are no different from Christians
He was just cherry picking. We do have sahih Hadiths about it. Here is a Sahih tradition of the Imam(عليه السلام) saying Fatima(sa) was a martyr: Muhammad in Yahya has narrated from al-‘Amrakiy ibn Ali from Ali ibn Ja‘far from his brother from abu al-Hassan ((عليه السلام).) who has said the following. “Fatima is truthful and a martyr. Al Kafi, V 1, Kitab al Hujjah, Ch 114, h 2 Allamah Majlisi: صحيح
hey farid can you disect this one from their one of the book "وأما ابنتك فتظلم وتحرم ويؤخذ حقها غصبا الذي تجعله لها ، وتضرب وهي حامل ، ويدخل عليها وعلى حريمها ومنزلها بغير إذن ، ثم يمسها هوان وذل ثم لا تجد مانعا ، وتطرح ما في بطنها من الضرب وتموت من ذلك الضرب." in book كامل الزيارات
Salam, does Bukhari and others not say, Fatima died angry with AbuBakr? Is this not a Sahih hadith? Also, does Bukhari not state: Rasulillah said whoever angers Fatima (a.s) angers me. Even if you want to believe this is about imam Ali (a.s), you can't deny Fatima died angry with AbuBakr and not Ali. How do you explain this? It's also a fact that no one knows where Fatima (a.s) was buried (except imam Ali (a.s)), as requested by Fatima (a.s). On the day of judgement we will face Rasulillah (S), who's side will you be on, Fatima (a.s) or AbuBakr? Do you think Rasulillah (S) will take sides with AbuBakr? Will you dissociate yourself from the people who angered Fatima? Please explain your point of view. I would like to learn.
Farid responds please make a refutations against Dr Hany atchan. His channel is base on leading his followers towards being quranists. He claims he's not a quranist but he believes his methodology called abrahamic locution and say that the early scholars had a weak methodology and say his is better astaggfirullah. His channel is the marvelous quran.
I've actually read a book that listed every report for this alleged attack and saw how weak the arguments are. That is why I was confident enough to make this challenge.
I think the problem here is about authenticity standards established post Allama Hilli and authenticity standards of classical scholars. If we go by classical akhbari shia methodology, then Book of sulaim is Sahih / authentic by Ijma as that book has been transmitted by Ashaab Al Ijam + Mashaikh e Ijaza
@@FaridResponds Yeah. But when we know that Shia narrations are actually transmission of Books by ijaza of their sheikh, this removes alot of issues. Besides Hammad Bin Isa is from Ashaab al ijma and he's transmitting the book of sulaim thats like Sahih By Ijma per classical scholars bro. However, post allama hilli may have different standards and they don't have any solid proof for calling someome weak / liar / majhool.
@@syedalimehdi-english ...and your opinion about Ashab al Ijma is that whatever they say is correct even if they are narrating reports that are problematic in isnad?
@@FaridResponds depends how you define the *problematic isnad* here. If you're gonna point to narrations that have *problems* as per standards of Hilli, khoei, sistani etc etc then its different. Classical shia scholars had ijma on sehat of narrations transmitted by ashab al ijma. So if Hilli, khoei, mamqani, jawahiri etc who come 100s of years later object to those isnad that x, y or z from whom ashab al ijma transmitted books is weak, they have no proof for that i believe. Also, considering those people had ijaza to transmit from books of authentic shia scholars also serves as tawtheeq.
@@FaridResponds i'm just learning more, even trying to get a hold of arabic slowly, so i'm not an expert. I'm just listening to everyone to reach a conclusion. However currently, i hold the opinion that content narrated by ashaab al ijma is sahih and reliable by ijma quoted by classical scholars of rijal even if ashaab al ijma narrate from weak narrators / authors.
Hijab / Niqab / Face Cover for Women is a Biblical and Jesus' teachings: “One evening he was walking out in the fields, when suddenly he saw a group of people approaching on camels. So he started toward them. Rebekah saw him coming; she got down from her camel, and asked, “Who is that man?” “He is my master Isaac,” the servant answered. Then Rebekah covered her face with her veil.” (Genesis 24:63-65 CEVDCI) “Your cheeks behind your veil are like a piece of pomegranate.” (Shir haShirim (Song of Songs) 6:7 TS2009) “Your lips are crimson cords, your mouth is shapely; behind your veil are hidden beautiful rosy cheeks.” (Song of Songs 4:3 CEVDCI) “She also realized that Shelah was now a grown man, but she had not been allowed to marry him. So she decided to dress in something other than her widow's clothes and to cover her face with a veil. After this, she sat outside the town of Enaim on the road to Timnah.” (Genesis 38:14 CEVDCI) “A woman should wear something on her head. It is a disgrace for a woman to shave her head or cut her hair. But if she refuses to wear something on her head, let her cut off her hair.” (1 Corinthians 11:6 CEVDCI) “When she came in, her face was covered with a veil. But the two evil men wanted to get one last good look at her, so they ordered her to take off her veil.” (Susanna 13:32 CEVDCI) Christians will never be granted Success if they remain Atheists and propagates Anti-Jesus policies.
Here are a few narrations from Shi'i sources: In the book al-Hujum 'ala bayt-i Fatima (a), written by 'Abd al-Zahra Mahdi, a writer of the 15th/21th century, 260 historical narrations and reports from more than 150 Shiite narrators and writers have been collected, in each of which some of the arguments for the martyrdom of Fatima al-Zahra (a) are mentioned; including the attack on Fatima’s house, abortion of her child and slapping and flogging her.[17] The oldest source cited by Shiite writers is the book of Sulaym b. Qays, who died in 90/708-9. There are narrations from Imam Musa and Imam Jafar in Tabrīzī, Ṣirāṭ al-najāt, vol. 3, p. 440-441.
@@MightyG0RILLA not that it matters but where is the word 'authentic' in my post? Your reply proves you missed the point of my post, which is to show an overwhelming amount of shi'ite hadith that state Fatimah was killed, which is to refute the title of this video.
@@anthonybey1324 so you agree that the report is not authentic? And you are citing it just for the sake of it? The video asked for authentic hadiths, if you believe this then you must believe Abu Talib breastfeed the Prophet
Here is a Sahih tradition of the Imam(عليه السلام) saying Fatima(sa) was a martyr: Muhammad in Yahya has narrated from al-‘Amrakiy ibn Ali from Ali ibn Ja‘far from his brother from abu al-Hassan ((عليه السلام).) who has said the following. “Fatima is truthful and a martyr. Al Kafi, V 1, Kitab al Hujjah, Ch 114, h 2 Allamah Majlisi: صحيح
Shia version of Fatima was strong and had superpowers. Broken rib cannot stop her for travelling roughly 6 hours every week. And Omar put forward Ali's name as possible successor because he was quote on quote " A nasibi". Yes it's crazy to be a shia 😂😂.
I got one for you Mr. Farid. Show me ONE hadith in the 6 sahih books that states that hadith Thaqalayn states (paraphrasing): 'I leave two weighty things...the Qur'an and Sunnah'. In all the sahih sources it states the two weighty things are the Qur'an and Ahlul Bayt.
اخوي فريد امس احمد الكاتب (باحث شيعي) نزل فيديو في قناه اليوتيوب مالته يتكلم عن كيف تحولت مظلوميه الزهراء من اشاعه الى ضرورة عقائدية و يبين بالادلة كيف تطورت الفكره تاريخيا فقلت يمكن يساعدك في بحوثك
Brother Farid what about that Hadith that saying Ali RA not permitted Abu Bakr to do Janaza and Burial during the death of Fatma? Shia side said this is Sahih Al Bukhari. How authentic is this?
@HADI TUBE this makes me think how did firaon die and how did Umer die in Sunni religion. And how did the kafira wife of Prophet Loot die and how did Kafira Aysha die.
Is it not pretty much well accepted in academia that Umar (ra) came to the house of Fatima (ra) and at some point threatened to set the house on fire, the house containing Fatima (ra)? Are there not multiple independent sources confirming this? Is it not true that Abu Bakr (ra) later regretted it? Well to the first question, there are many sources confirming there was some confrontation, but not the physicality of its nature. Edit/Correction: It is not well accepted.
Even the threat is not authentic and that weak Hadith destroys the whole narrative of the Shia since nothing happened and Fatima RA agrees with Umar RA and warns ali RA and zubair RA
@@HiHi-ek1dd It is not a slander it is a term for those who reject one of our imam meaing Abu Bakr, Ali, Umar, Usman. And Those in shia who reject one of these imam are called rafidi its not a slander but tachnical term. If they dosent Reject then i wont call them rafida. And if you say that this is a slander then i will say that calling non muslims kafir is also slander dont you call non muslims kafir or are you gonna say that no it is a slander we cant call them kafir. and if you say that then i will say to you bye Assalamualaikum brother!
For some reason the comment section seems empty here. If the evidence for this martyrdom is so scant, I wonder when and how this idea took hold within the Shii community.
How can one believe that Hazrat Abu Bakr R.A or Hazrat Umar R.A killed Hazrat Fatima R.A and Hazrat Ali R.A or their Children did nothing? And the fact that Prophet Muhammed S.a.w.w. said Hazrat Abu Bakr R.A and Hazrat Umar R.A are among the people of Jannah? To think that closest Companions of Prophet Muhammed S.a.w.w. were hypocrites is straight up stupid.
Ali hated Omar so much that he gave him his daughter's hand in marriage. (Taqyah or love?) Ali hated Omar, Abu Bakr and Uthman to the point that he named his children Omar, Abu Bakr and Uthman. (Taqyah or love?) Ali was known for his bravery especially in wars but let Omar and Abu Bakr enter his house in his presence and beat his wife and kill his child and despite this Ali named his sons Omar and Abu Bakr. (Taqyah or love?) Imam Zain al-Abideen (4th Imam) hated Omar to the point that he named his son Omar al Ashraf. (Taqyah or love?) Imam al-Hussein ibn Ali ibn Abi Tâlib gave the name of Omar to his son in revenge on Omar Ibn Alkhattab. (Taqyah or love?) Imam Ja'far al-Sadiq (6th Imam) gave the name of Aisha to his own daughter. (Taqyah or love?) Imam Musa Al Kadhim (7th Imam) hated Aisha so much that he gave his daughter his name. (Taqyah or love?) Imam Ridha hated Aisha so much that he also named her his daughter Aisha. (taqyah or love?) Imam Ali al-Hadi (10th Imam) hated Aisha and as proof of this hatred he named his daughter Aisha. (Taqyah or love?) If the Shias really follow their imams as they claim, they should have imotated them by calling their sons and daughters: Abu Bakr, Omar, Othman, Aicha ... The Shias of today are liars saying that they pursue their imams but they pursue Satan and that is why they are not considered as Muslims ... they insult the mothers of Muslims and the wives of our prophet, they also insult almost all of our prophet's companions, they say that the Quran is falsified, they have their own cults which have nothing to do with Islam ...
Google results on walking with broken rib Most broken ribs resolve within six weeks. You'll need to take it easy during this time, but you should still be able to walk around and do your daily activities. If you find that the pain isn't getting any better, see a doctor to rule out any additional injuries that could be causing your symptoms
Shia is way better then Ali r.a. even saydina ali r.a pledge allegiance to his friend saydina abu bakar and umar r.a but not the shia. They think they know better the relationship between those prophet muhammad s.a.w companion then saydina ali himself.
firstly, the last hadith Farid brought was an extremly dumb argument. She went to the graves before being attacked and stopped after she no longer could. Also there is a reason why Farid is constantly repeating that he wants only one hadith. He claims he is making it easier, lol, who r u making fun of? He does this so he can cope with that single chain and play around that one hadith, but the truth is, we have HUNDREDS of different chains about the attack, HUNDREDS! what else is tawatur?
hundreds of broken weak chains doesn't make a sahih one. with that logic a 100 years from now we could fabricate anything we want if we rile enough people today. plus wdym the last statement is dumb. what are you on. it states 'every'. you don't think one of your most important scholars would state 'every week before the attack'. no. it states EVERY FRIDAY and prior to that clearly mentions she was alive for 75 days. again, 3 shia scholars came together and were refuted by farid using your own books. May Allah guide you.
![Debunking Shia Claim: Abu Bakr and Omar killed Fatima!! [Mahdi Modarresi]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/u92BmUM3rxM/mqdefault.jpg)
![Debunking Shia Claim: Abu Bakr and Omar killed Fatima!! [Mahdi Modarresi]](/img/tr.png)
"You cant even prove it from Shii standards, and you want the world to believe in it"
Thats so powerful.
Here is a Sahih tradition of the Imam(عليه السلام) saying Fatima(sa) was a martyr:
Muhammad in Yahya has narrated from al-‘Amrakiy ibn Ali from Ali ibn Ja‘far from his brother from abu al-Hassan ((عليه السلام).) who has said the following. “Fatima is truthful and a martyr.
Al Kafi, V 1, Kitab al Hujjah, Ch 114, h 2
Allamah Majlisi: صحيح
"Authentic Shia hadith" is one of my favorite oxymorons 😁
Deep😂
that applies over sunnsm mostly...😂😂
Deep from inside Shi'a know that Ahlus Sunnah is the Haqq. They are just emotional because they are born in that family of minority.
Anyone born has the fitrah that we don't make ourselfs bleed by whip, and we worship Allah alone directly. Without something in between.
The mushrik pagans had statue (stone) between them and Allah, big groep of shi'a take dead people in graves as mediator between them and Allah. This is Shirk.
No one in AhlusSunnah worships any companion along (not even as mediator) when they worship Allah. Look our Adhaan is authentic, but your adhaan is modified, you added one sentence on the Word of Allah. Do you think Allah makes mistakes? You think adhaan incomplete? How dare you to instult Allah. Allah is Perfect and Adhaan is Perfect, you can take nothing and remove nothing from it. Not even my own father Wollahi.
You are welcome as my brother, just follow the Sunnah of the prophet like us ~90%. Pray Directly to Allah without someone in between.
May Allah bless them (Shi'a) all with authentic Islam.
@@xtreme6018
Sunni hadith state actual names, practically all Shi'a ones literally say "someone told someone else" at numerous places in it's hadith chains. Allah azzawajjal gave baraqah to Islam that he made your sources blatantly false
@@anneeq008 Haven't really looked into shia. I didn't know that. But that's quite interesting.
Well I was not expecting this one but it's popcorn time
Lol
😂😂 facts!
I was exposed to Shia. Mostly me challenging them on social media and not losing despite my very lackluster knowledge on issue. The devil brought up doubts in my mind. And then I found this channel. Alhamdulillah!
Assalamulakum, I'm willing to discuss you.
@@HiHi-ek1dd There is no "Qaf" in Salaam.
@@ridovercascade4551 Surah rad ayat 24
@@ridovercascade4551 I'm don't know Arabic a lot, so I might be wrong. Anyways I edited it.
@@HiHi-ek1dd there is Misunderstanding of my comment, let me clarify: the letter that was used in this Ayah "Kef" not. "Qaf". Alaikum and not Alaiqum.
Regarding your comment now "Salaam" is not recommend, it should be "AsSalamu alaikum wa Rahmatullahi wa Barakatuh".
But these are details brother, don't worry. I ask you to have the understanding in Arabic before you invite people to discuss otherwise you will waste time of people.
Indeed Allah sent the Quran in Arabic, such that we can understand.
My native language isn't Arabic. I see first time a Muslim who doesn't know the difference between the letters Kef and Qaf. Why can't you at least read Arabic? Or at least memorized the letters?
I became Sunni at the age of 15 alhamdulillah.
Mashallah brother
What tashhud u recited when u were shia? And tell me something that shias do in 2nd combined namaz that u sunnis don't do let's see if u were a shia even in first place
you became a real muslim not sunni
@DODOPLAYZ013 I am twelver Shia but why do u ask?
I am sure you had a lot of questions that you didn't asked. I am a Islamic teacher and many of the kids don't have knowledge and some of them go to sunni mosques because of their sunni friends are going there, but don't know much about the Shia Islam because they don't ask the right people.
''The disbelievers say, “If only a sign could be sent down to him from his Lord.”
Say, ˹O Prophet,˺ “Indeed, Allah leaves to stray whoever He wills, and
guides to Himself whoever turns to Him.' The Noble Qur'an, 13: 27
@Rilo Saint Phillip we don’t hate each other but Wahhabism hates to see unity of Muslims and they try to make hatred among Sunni and Shia Muslims.
@@hadisehlavasaniantiwahhabi1572 you're ignorant may Allah guide us all
@@ismailah4576 what?????
@@ismailah4576 and I think you are brainwashed.
@Rilo Saint Phillip tell that to catholic and protestant, how many people died because of the difference between catholic and protestant
If the Prophet Muhammad (SAAWS) prophesied that Sayyida Fatima (RAA) would be the first of his relatives to die after him, but the Twelver Imamiyyah Shi’a Rawafidh claim that her unborn son al-Muhsin (or al-Muhassin) was killed in the alleged “attack” upon Fatima al-Zahraa (RAA), aren’t they basically saying that the Prophet (SAAWS) lied or gave a false prophecy?
sorry connect the dots for me, what does this unborn child who for some reason has a name have to do with prophecy of her death.
@@mohameda5947 they believe that al muhsin was the first to die from ahlul bait after the prophet peace and blessings be upon him. But also have a hadith that says that Fatima ra was the first of ahlul bait to die after the prophet PBBUH. This is contradictory
@@Omer1996E.C thank you.
@@mohameda5947 it's my pleasure
@@Omer1996E.C Assalamulalkum, muslim 44 55 I can send 4 more. I'll send like 6+ prophecy of 12 successors after me, I'll send you many things if you'd like.
MashaAllah brother Farid... May Allah bless you.💐 Love you.👌
He sift through that nonsense like a boss.. MasyaAllah.. Baarakallahu fiik
Roads are flattened and straightened now.
In the past, there were village roads and zigzag routes. That same route took longer.
Mashallah bro. May Allah bless you ♥️
I miss you bro What ever you do you do it in the best way possible may you be highly rewarded for that
MashaAllah you don't hold back any punches bro Farid, may Allah Azzawajal bless you and your family, ameen
Assalam-O-alaikum Brother I love you for the sake of Allah, may Allah bless you, forgive all of your sins, and admit you into the highest place in Jannah Ameen.
@Rilo Saint Phillip Not as divided as christians or nationalist atheists :)
Ameen
@Rilo Saint Phillip uh? Shias and Sunnis don't believe in different Qurans, the only difference is political- real muslims are those who follow the truth, the truth is subjective in this content.
Lets see if their "divine" 12th dajjal imam can handle the challenge.
@@AbdulH97 Very busy , the video is 3+ hours long btw.
why are you saying them dajjal they are imam of muslims Ahle Sunnah love and respect them read Books of rijal this not the way Ahle Sunnah should go
@@M.S10000 You misunderstood the brother, he's saying their fantasy Imam (12th) has the same story as Dajal - meaning he's been alive and in hiding. I mean it's just a guess, it might be that their 12th Imam has nothing to do with Dajal but the resemblance is certainly there. As for the Mahdi (AS) then we are not talking about him, the Shi'a have no right over him, other than fabricated stories.
@@one_dawah May Allah reward you for your efforts. I look forward to the video :)
I believe in spidermans existence more than Imam Zamans existence
Why is Othman not from Ahl al-Bayt?
I mean, he married two of the Prophet's daughters
In fact, he is the only man who married two of the Prophet's daughters
Never knew a man had done this before him
Even with the prophets who passed away
And he also killed in a bad way , in really bad way
forget shia man they believe Ali is allah auzubillah
Why are you going to Uthman, they even accuse the mother of the believers Aisha RA who was the wife of the prophet. You cant get any closer to ahlu al bayt than that... Abu Bakr was the father in law of the prophet, thats not ahlu al bayt?
@@MrIkytv
Not true.
Only the extremists who they also regard as outside the fold of Islam.
Please don't submit incorrect information.
because Ahlul Bayt are not those in your imagination, thus 'uthman isn't from them even if he married the 2 r.a :)
@@user-co8uf1mj6c so your wife and your family in law is not your ahlu’l bait? I mean I genuinely asking this question as I’m confused
I would describe this as a subtle “super saiyan” slap in the face of rafidah!🤣😆
Your cult is a joke
“A'isha opined/said that adult breast feeding makes an individual mahram and she breastfed a young adult man and he would enter upon her, but the remainder/other mothers of the believers denied it ie being permisible (adult breast feeding) ...”
Ref: 'Fatah ul-Mun’im Sharh Sahih Muslim', volume 5, page 622.
@BubbaInTheBasement you couldn't respond to the hadith in your book saying that aisha breastfeed adult men so this is your best response pathetic see how fragile your religion is we can end it in a second by just using your own book's against you and what pagan Jewish saint alhamdulillah shias worship only Allah unlike you who worship a God that is a beardless man with curly hair as your hadiths say and ibn Taymiyyah your scholar authenticated the hadith
In al-Tasis fi al-rad ala Asas al-Taqdis, Volume 3 page 214 Ibn Taymiyyah says this:
We conclude that it was eyesight as it is in the Sahih narration from Qutada from Ikrama from Ibn Abbas said that the Prophet said I saw my God in the image of a beardless man with long curly hair in a green garden
Your Shaykh Ibn Taymiyyah states here that the hadith is Sahih It's authentic. Audhubillah so who is a jew now I know that you won't respond to my comment in a academical logical way since I brought evidence from your books and absolutely obliterated your cult
@BubbaInTheBasement 1. okay what if it Is Google pasting what's the problem that doesn't change the fact that this is In your books 2. You're avoiding the references I provided to you and brushing them aside like it's not important so your religion is this fragile you can't even explain the things in your books and you're instead jumping to my book's alhamdulillah shia Islam is not a fragile religion like yours and we explain the things in our books yes we have a hadith that says nasibis are penetrated at birth I don't see the issue with this hadith of course you people who love the enemies of ahlulbayt insult their followers and believe that a beardless boy is Allah is penetrated by iblees I don't understand how this is something that destroys our religion or whatever it's not like your book's in which Allah is a human and has a body plus you have similar beliefs about others to you make takfir on us and call us fire worshippers and you have similar hadiths in your book's which says similar things about the Christians and Jews so how is it a big issue when similar things exist in your religion as for the hadiths that forbids building shrines we can discuss them bring the hadiths and I will explain it to you
They are done🤣
@@ShiaRafidhiAkhbariIslam bro do you really want to get to that level. I can quote hadiths from your books that show Abu talib breastfed the prophet Muhammad ﷺ 😂
Thanks for the sincerity and academic integrity Farid, truly this slanderous libel of the killing of Fatima has no place in Tashayu' and history in general.
Masha Allah nice clip and to all my brothers in comment section who are so much angry. When you step into their shoes you will realise that they have been taught to hate sunnis since child hood. They have set of beliefs on which the try to mold Islam into and this also happens in some sunni sects specially in the sub continent. You would be surprised to listen to their beliefs. In the end guidance is from Allah. May Allah guide them and us all as well. If we don't stick to the book of Allah we will be lost. Jazakallah once again to brother farid
Truth stands out clear from falsehood.
Amen, if you want i can answer his claim.
Farid bro need more videos from you on shia polemics
May Allah guide all Shia to the truth of Sunni Islam.
For critical thinkers and rationalists: These sahaba were the great companions of the prophet (peace be upon him). They accompanied him, lived with him and were supporters and associates. No one creates a clash or conflict between the family of the prophet and the companions except innovators who are incapable to draw evidence from the prophet (peace be upon him) himself or his family which is amazing. What is their historic evidence? From an incident striking controversy that happened from the time of the fourth caliphate and nothing prior. According to them, a bunch of nobodies (not approved by the prophet) are their reliable point of reference (same case with the Christians and their authors of the Bible) instead of those who walked with the "walking revelation" and accompanied him (peace be upon him), maintaining their good relationship until his passing.
For mythology believers: "the Hadith of ghadir?" It's like, uh were the narrators reliable, were they? They had "an agenda" yet they narrated their own supposed doom did they? Was Ali put as a leader at that period or was that statement in relation to an incident within a context? "12 imams", another similarity with the Christians of inventing things vis-a-vis the trinity, otherwise nowhere to be found except via later innovators, period. "Muawiyah had a fight with Ali" uh, yes, therefore... 12 imams, therefore... ? "the Quran was preserved by Ali and ahlul bayt (including the women) by themselves and transmitted it to the world", *head scratch*, *cough*, but that's physically impossible, especially in those times and they were under the reign of others therefore what do you say about authorisation (?), and how do you account for a unified, precisely consist book accessed across distant lands? Exactly, associates all along from the beginning. The number of companions overwhelm ahlul bayt, had the accusations been true in the slightest by the innovators, there would be no such authentic Scripture.
So you're saying if the Sahaba were not righteous and were evil the Qur'an would not have been preserved?
Yes, reliability is a necessary condition for authenticity and hence preservation. It also demonstrates commitment and truthfulness. If you accept the product, then you concede to the reliability (i.e true believers) of its deliverers.
This would also mean that you have to accept their Hadiths too if demonstrated authentic, otherwise you would be guilty of having double standards.
Nobody other than the prophets (peace be upon them) are infallible. When you say evil, that could only be in the form of committing ordinary sins that does not affect their truthfulness to Islam otherwise I’m sure you’d agree to the impossibility of a scripture being authentic in its entirety by “evil” people when they are the only ones who first-hand received the revelation from the prophet, making everyone after them dependent on them necessarily.
In regards to sins, their good outweigh their mistakes and by virtue of being who they were, they are superior than any people who comes after them as per the prophet’s statements and the Quran. This means that they are removed from “evil”.
Moreover, one of the worst yet obvious errors of shias is that they give a blind eye to clear evidence and clear texts which is bewildering and a delusional, pitiful state to be in. It then becomes a purely emotional argument from them that doesn’t allow for the rule of reason and logic which is common with folks of other religions.
Some of the virtues of the sahaba:
“Allaah knows best with whom to place His Message”. [al-An’aam 6:124]
One of the scholars (may Allaah have mercy on him) commented: Allaah knows best where to place His Message, both with regard to the original recipient (the prophet) and those who inherit it from him (his companions). He knows best who is fit to receive His Message and convey it to His slaves in a trustworthy and sincere manner, respecting the Sender and fulfilling his duties towards Him, patiently following His commands and showing gratitude for His blessings and drawing close to Him, and He knows who is not fit for that. Similarly, He knows best who among the nations is fit to be the heirs of His Messengers and to succeed them and convey the Message that they received from their Lord. End quote.
Allaah says: “Thus We have tried some of them with others, that they might say: ‘Is it these (poor believers) whom Allaah has favoured from amongst us?’ Does not Allaah know best those who are grateful?” [al-An’aam 6:53]
One of the scholars (may Allaah have mercy on him) commented: Those who acknowledge the blessing and affirm it, and who do what it requires of righteous deeds, are the ones on whom Allaah bestows His blessing, to the exclusion of those who are not grateful, for Allaah is wise and He does not place His bounty with one who is not qualified to receive it.
Just as there are many verses and ahaadeeth which speak of their virtue and high status, so too there are texts which state the reasons why they deserved this high status, such as the verse in which Allaah says:
“Muhammad is the Messenger of Allaah. And those who are with him are severe against the disbelievers (for the general audience: this applies in the context of oppression, see surah al Mumtahanah verse 8 for clarification) and merciful among themselves. You see them bowing and prostrating (in prayer), seeking Bounty from Allaah and (His) Good Pleasure. The mark of them (i.e. of their Faith) is on their faces (foreheads) from the traces of prostration (during prayers). This is their description in the Tawraat (Torah). But their description in the Injeel (Gospel) is like a (sown) seed which sends forth its shoot, then makes it strong, and becomes thick and it stands straight on its stem, delighting the sowers, that He may enrage the disbelievers with them. Allaah has promised those among them who believe (i.e. all those who follow Islamic Monotheism, the religion of Prophet Muhammad till the Day of Resurrection) and do righteous good deeds, forgiveness and a mighty reward (i.e. Paradise)”
[al-Fath 48:29]
“Indeed, Allaah was pleased with the believers when they gave the Bay‘ah (pledge) to you (O Muhammad) under the tree, He knew what was in their hearts, and He sent down As‑Sakeenah (calmness and tranquillity) upon them, and He rewarded them with a near victory”
[al-Fath 48:18]
“And the foremost to embrace Islam of the Muhaajiroon and the Ansaar and also those who followed them exactly (in Faith). Allaah is well-pleased with them as they are well-pleased with Him. He has prepared for them Gardens under which rivers flow (Paradise), to dwell therein forever. That is the supreme success”
[al-Tawbah 9:100]
“Do not revile my companions, for by the One in Whose hand is my soul, if one of you were to spend the equivalent of Uhud in gold, it would not amount to a mudd of one of them, or half of that.” Narrated by al-Bukhaari (3673) and Muslim (2540).
The students of knowledge say: Even if there was nothing narrated from Allaah or His Messenger about them, the things that they did such as migrating (hijrah), engaging in jihad (Just war), supporting (the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) and Islam, expending their lives and their wealth, ending their ties (to the extent of war) with their fathers and sons, sincerely following the deen, believing strongly and with certainty, is definitive proof of their good character and sincerity, and shows that they are superior to all those sincere people of good character who come after them, for all time. This is the view of all the scholars, and of the fuqaha’ whose opinion counts. End quote.
One of the great scholars (may Allaah have mercy on him) said: Ahl al-Sunnah speak well of them, and pray for mercy and forgiveness for them, but they do not believe that anyone is infallible or that anyone is protected from making mistakes in their ijtihaad except the Messenger of Allaah; it is possible for anyone else to commit sins or make mistakes, but they are as Allaah says:
“They are those from whom We shall accept the best of their deeds and overlook their evil deeds. (They shall be) among the dwellers of Paradise ___ a promise of truth, which they have been promised” [al-Ahqaaf 46:16].
The virtue of any deeds is to be judged by the results and consequences. End quote.
This is confirmed in the Qur’aan and Sunnah, in more than one place. Allaah forgave those of the Sahaabah who turned back on the day of Uhud, as He says:
“Those of you who turned back on the day the two hosts met (i.e. the battle of Uhud), it was Shaytaan (Satan) who caused them to backslide (run away from the battlefield) because of some (sins) they had earned. But Allaah, indeed, has forgiven them. Surely, Allaah is Oft‑Forgiving, Most Forbearing”
[Aal ‘Imraan 3:155]
And there are other cases in which some of the Sahaabah committed sins, then Allaah, may He be exalted, pardoned them and forgave them, which is indicative of their virtue and honour and that cannot be undermined by any mistake that they made during the time of the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) or after he died. The verses and Hadith quoted above, which speak of their virtue and give them the glad tidings of Paradise, cannot be abrogated by anything.
The conclusion is pretty obvious about the sahaba and the aspersions cast upon them are disqualified and invalidated.
Allah knows best.
how do u knw this hadith is as same of prophet time??? have u ever studied communication sub tht how news distorted though in early age!! even modern day news r fabricately spread..where america killed 17afghan bcuz of fabricated n wrng news as terror group??? we knw well about mongol n crusador invasion in muslim wrld ..how they burnt the library n books n mosque...how we believe hadith can be authentic which were false attributely to muhammod fr political aim n as well as personal opinions or gain something else like dominence over women...though ppl doubt over quran fr distortion..let alone hadith...bt brimington n saudi n turkey n uzbekistan quran manuscript ensured us fr authenticity of radio carbon date of 99% n allah himself promised us of getting distortion..prophet taught quran mainly, where from 4 companion as well as aisha n hafsa collected n sent to different parts of the wrld...it was spread out as personal note of ppl n culturel n tradition n bigotry n superstition n incomplete narration which anyone can identify
@@xtreme6018 You must be a Quranist. First go and learn about Hadith sciences, then come back, kid.
@Isbat UI Kareem Your comment is as poor as your gibberish writing.
"Allah himself promised us distortions"
".. Where four companions as well as aisha and hafsa collected n sent it to different parts of the world.. "
Ya miskeen.
How do we know? Ok, first let me ask you, do you know if your parents are really your parents?
The narration at 17:00 is mistranslated.
The original Arabic says, في كل جمعة مرتين: الاثنين، والخميس
The translation provided translates the word جمعة as Friday, which is the common usage of the word. However, the way it is written in Arabic (especially using the colon) indicates that جمعة here's means "a week", which is another usage of the word. So the correct translation would be that she visited the graves twice a week: on Mondays and Thursdays
this makes alot of sense, thanks.
Where is ur proof? I never no such thing jum'a being translated as week mate
@@jamworthy14 the “:” is the proof to say that جمعة is indicating a spectrum rather than a specific day.
@@HanTian777 what . R u referring to taa marboota
@@HanTian777 that's not proof. Do u know Arabic ? How do u do it. Make up ur own stuff. That's how jumma is written mate. It means Friday not week 🙏🏻
Farid is really knowledgeable. JazakumulLahu khairan.
new fan of yours,
May Allah bless u
Allah is first
Always
May Allah bless younam very very happy to see your knowledge masallah
Barak Allahu feeka brother Farid .
May Allah bless u brother ❤☝
shia hadith science most important method is "just believe me bro"
Salam Alaikum farid. May ALLAH bless you akhi❤️
farid just want to clear one thing regarding the second hadith of Rustum , if the chain was sahee but book was not so what will be the ruling of sahih chain and was that hadith somewhere else mentioned bcoz of the sahee chain?
Since the attribution is a problem, then the compiler is unreliable. So technically, the first person in the chain is weak.
@@FaridResponds Alhumdulliah
Why is it harder to prove the authenticity of a mass transmitted report? If it is mass transmitted, it needs to be of higher quality right?
My favorite Shi’a hadith narrator is definitely José Florez.
Oh I was waiting for the funny clip at the end I guess you can't make everyone happy and you said that yourself but I am happy anyways the video was great 👍 keep it up
At the end you crushed their doctrine Al hum du LILLAH
He's back!
Does anyone know how I can come in contact with Farid?
he reads all the comments, just type it.
Maybe from his Twitter
@15:00 Last/3rd narration was general... there was no mention of Umar or Abu Bakr in that. رضي الله عنهما
May Allaah keep me upon the haqq
Farid what about the hadith above the one you mentioned...is it also authentic becoz it prohibits from building mosques on graves
Can you please post link of this hadith here.....
JazakAllah Allah khair for this amazing video!
Again absolutely demolished and exposed some of these liars! To me they are no different from Christians
Jazakallahu khayran
U da man! JazakAllahu khairan
How can you tell a shia from a sunni?
Shias have no noor in their faces
I have seen many Shia Muslims that show Noor.
Shia and sunni both can have Noor. It depends on their own taqwa in Allah (SWT), personality and actions
And Iman of course
Alhamdulilah, you responded to that video! These Shias are so petty.
He was just cherry picking. We do have sahih Hadiths about it.
Here is a Sahih tradition of the Imam(عليه السلام) saying Fatima(sa) was a martyr:
Muhammad in Yahya has narrated from al-‘Amrakiy ibn Ali from Ali ibn Ja‘far from his brother from abu al-Hassan ((عليه السلام).) who has said the following. “Fatima is truthful and a martyr.
Al Kafi, V 1, Kitab al Hujjah, Ch 114, h 2
Allamah Majlisi: صحيح
May Allah reward you 🤲🏼
How calm this schlor seems to be
Barkallahfikum 💫
Mashallah!
Shia and Abzia are our brothers.
They have gone astray.
May ALLAH Guide Them
hey farid can you disect this one from their one of the book "وأما ابنتك فتظلم وتحرم ويؤخذ حقها غصبا الذي تجعله لها ، وتضرب وهي حامل ، ويدخل عليها وعلى حريمها ومنزلها بغير إذن ، ثم يمسها هوان وذل ثم لا تجد مانعا ، وتطرح ما في بطنها من الضرب وتموت من ذلك الضرب." in book كامل الزيارات
Well done bro.. Jazak Allah
Bro what happend to your vids responding to AP? :(
Been busy. Gimme a bit.
PLease make a video on shia ilm ur rijal o hadith
Salam, does Bukhari and others not say, Fatima died angry with AbuBakr? Is this not a Sahih hadith? Also, does Bukhari not state: Rasulillah said whoever angers Fatima (a.s) angers me. Even if you want to believe this is about imam Ali (a.s), you can't deny Fatima died angry with AbuBakr and not Ali. How do you explain this? It's also a fact that no one knows where Fatima (a.s) was buried (except imam Ali (a.s)), as requested by Fatima (a.s). On the day of judgement we will face Rasulillah (S), who's side will you be on, Fatima (a.s) or AbuBakr? Do you think Rasulillah (S) will take sides with AbuBakr? Will you dissociate yourself from the people who angered Fatima? Please explain your point of view. I would like to learn.
If you tell a big lie and repeat it often enough, people will believe it in the end without questioning.
Are you talking about the Shia or Sunni?
Jazaakallaahu khayran
Farid responds please make a refutations against Dr Hany atchan. His channel is base on leading his followers towards being quranists. He claims he's not a quranist but he believes his methodology called abrahamic locution and say that the early scholars had a weak methodology and say his is better astaggfirullah. His channel is the marvelous quran.
Working on it.
❤ from kerala, india
All this video did was prove that Farid doesn’t care about his own sources and that he only wants one report because he’s too lazy to read more.
I've actually read a book that listed every report for this alleged attack and saw how weak the arguments are. That is why I was confident enough to make this challenge.
@@FaridResponds What book? I’m seeing multiple sources and references for this, wouldn’t that make it mutawatir?
@@zayn670 No
@@thereligionofabraham explain
@@FaridResponds Akhi can you please name the book? Would be very beneficial for a lot of people
I think the problem here is about authenticity standards established post Allama Hilli and authenticity standards of classical scholars. If we go by classical akhbari shia methodology, then Book of sulaim is Sahih / authentic by Ijma as that book has been transmitted by Ashaab Al Ijam + Mashaikh e Ijaza
Akhbari standards aren't classical though.
@@FaridResponds Yeah. But when we know that Shia narrations are actually transmission of Books by ijaza of their sheikh, this removes alot of issues. Besides Hammad Bin Isa is from Ashaab al ijma and he's transmitting the book of sulaim thats like Sahih By Ijma per classical scholars bro. However, post allama hilli may have different standards and they don't have any solid proof for calling someome weak / liar / majhool.
@@syedalimehdi-english ...and your opinion about Ashab al Ijma is that whatever they say is correct even if they are narrating reports that are problematic in isnad?
@@FaridResponds depends how you define the *problematic isnad* here.
If you're gonna point to narrations that have *problems* as per standards of Hilli, khoei, sistani etc etc then its different. Classical shia scholars had ijma on sehat of narrations transmitted by ashab al ijma. So if Hilli, khoei, mamqani, jawahiri etc who come 100s of years later object to those isnad that x, y or z from whom ashab al ijma transmitted books is weak, they have no proof for that i believe. Also, considering those people had ijaza to transmit from books of authentic shia scholars also serves as tawtheeq.
@@FaridResponds i'm just learning more, even trying to get a hold of arabic slowly, so i'm not an expert. I'm just listening to everyone to reach a conclusion. However currently, i hold the opinion that content narrated by ashaab al ijma is sahih and reliable by ijma quoted by classical scholars of rijal even if ashaab al ijma narrate from weak narrators / authors.
Youre doing a very good job, and you are one of the very few, who are able to do so, keep it up.
Hijab / Niqab / Face Cover for Women is a Biblical and Jesus' teachings:
“One evening he was walking out in the fields, when suddenly he saw a group of people approaching on camels. So he started toward them. Rebekah saw him coming; she got down from her camel, and asked, “Who is that man?” “He is my master Isaac,” the servant answered. Then Rebekah covered her face with her veil.” (Genesis 24:63-65 CEVDCI)
“Your cheeks behind your veil are like a piece of pomegranate.” (Shir haShirim (Song of Songs) 6:7 TS2009)
“Your lips are crimson cords, your mouth is shapely; behind your veil are hidden beautiful rosy cheeks.” (Song of Songs 4:3 CEVDCI)
“She also realized that Shelah was now a grown man, but she had not been allowed to marry him. So she decided to dress in something other than her widow's clothes and to cover her face with a veil. After this, she sat outside the town of Enaim on the road to Timnah.” (Genesis 38:14 CEVDCI)
“A woman should wear something on her head. It is a disgrace for a woman to shave her head or cut her hair. But if she refuses to wear something on her head, let her cut off her hair.” (1 Corinthians 11:6 CEVDCI)
“When she came in, her face was covered with a veil. But the two evil men wanted to get one last good look at her, so they ordered her to take off her veil.” (Susanna 13:32 CEVDCI)
Christians will never be granted Success if they remain Atheists and propagates Anti-Jesus policies.
9:45 LOL The compiler came before the narrator...smh
Salam brother Farid, everything good? Yaahaafaazaak'Allah.
Excellent work!
I don't think you need to do anything beyond reading the Qur'an to realize how alien the Shi'i beliefs are to the Qur'an.
Here are a few narrations from Shi'i sources:
In the book al-Hujum 'ala bayt-i Fatima (a), written by 'Abd al-Zahra Mahdi, a writer of the 15th/21th century, 260 historical narrations and reports from more than 150 Shiite narrators and writers have been collected, in each of which some of the arguments for the martyrdom of Fatima al-Zahra (a) are mentioned; including the attack on Fatima’s house, abortion of her child and slapping and flogging her.[17] The oldest source cited by Shiite writers is the book of Sulaym b. Qays, who died in 90/708-9.
There are narrations from Imam Musa and Imam Jafar in Tabrīzī, Ṣirāṭ al-najāt, vol. 3, p. 440-441.
how can you mention Kitab of Sulaym b. Qays and the word authentic togther💀💀
@@MightyG0RILLA not that it matters but where is the word 'authentic' in my post? Your reply proves you missed the point of my post, which is to show an overwhelming amount of shi'ite hadith that state Fatimah was killed, which is to refute the title of this video.
@@anthonybey1324 Did you watch the video???? He literally refuted "Mutawatir"
@@anthonybey1324 so you agree that the report is not authentic? And you are citing it just for the sake of it? The video asked for authentic hadiths, if you believe this then you must believe Abu Talib breastfeed the Prophet
100 weak reports doesn't make a sahih report. 💀
Subhanallah ❣️❣️❣️
وعليكم السلام ورحمة الله وبركاته
Here is a Sahih tradition of the Imam(عليه السلام) saying Fatima(sa) was a martyr:
Muhammad in Yahya has narrated from al-‘Amrakiy ibn Ali from Ali ibn Ja‘far from his brother from abu al-Hassan ((عليه السلام).) who has said the following. “Fatima is truthful and a martyr.
Al Kafi, V 1, Kitab al Hujjah, Ch 114, h 2
Allamah Majlisi: صحيح
Shia version of Fatima was strong and had superpowers. Broken rib cannot stop her for travelling roughly 6 hours every week. And Omar put forward Ali's name as possible successor because he was quote on quote " A nasibi". Yes it's crazy to be a shia 😂😂.
Shia left the comment section
I got one for you Mr. Farid. Show me ONE hadith in the 6 sahih books that states that hadith Thaqalayn states (paraphrasing): 'I leave two weighty things...the Qur'an and Sunnah'. In all the sahih sources it states the two weighty things are the Qur'an and Ahlul Bayt.
I agree with you.
@@FaridResponds Huh? Brother that leaves it at a cliff hanger. Atleast explain your views further
اخوي فريد امس احمد الكاتب (باحث شيعي) نزل فيديو في قناه اليوتيوب مالته يتكلم عن كيف تحولت مظلوميه الزهراء من اشاعه الى ضرورة عقائدية و يبين بالادلة كيف تطورت الفكره تاريخيا فقلت يمكن يساعدك في بحوثك
Assalamu aleykum brother
Brother Farid what about that Hadith that saying Ali RA not permitted Abu Bakr to do Janaza and Burial during the death of Fatma? Shia side said this is Sahih Al Bukhari. How authentic is this?
authentic but it was due to the modesty of Fatima a.s, even in death she did not wish for any man to see her.
This make me think how did judas die in the Bible and now how did Fatima died in shia hadith
@HADI TUBE this makes me think how did firaon die and how did Umer die in Sunni religion. And how did the kafira wife of Prophet Loot die and how did Kafira Aysha die.
@@abutalibansary4502kafira shia died on kufr while umar radiallahanhu died on sunnah of prophet saw leading Fajr prayer....🌝
@@abutalibansary4502umar رضي الله عنه died the same way of your imam 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
Is it not pretty much well accepted in academia that Umar (ra) came to the house of Fatima (ra) and at some point threatened to set the house on fire, the house containing Fatima (ra)? Are there not multiple independent sources confirming this? Is it not true that Abu Bakr (ra) later regretted it?
Well to the first question, there are many sources confirming there was some confrontation, but not the physicality of its nature.
Edit/Correction: It is not well accepted.
Even the threat is not authentic and that weak Hadith destroys the whole narrative of the Shia since nothing happened and Fatima RA agrees with Umar RA and warns ali RA and zubair RA
@@HH-er4qh Iam a from Alhe sunnah myself but i know that these people are not Shia these are Rafidha
@@abuhanif9896 Slandering is also a sin. So, why use the term rafidi Im just a Warner.
@@HiHi-ek1dd It is not a slander it is a term for those who reject one of our imam meaing Abu Bakr, Ali, Umar, Usman. And Those in shia who reject one of these imam are called rafidi its not a slander but tachnical term. If they dosent Reject then i wont call them rafida. And if you say that this is a slander then i will say that calling non muslims kafir is also slander dont you call non muslims kafir or are you gonna say that no it is a slander we cant call them kafir. and if you say that then i will say to you bye Assalamualaikum brother!
@@abuhanif9896 I can proof Ghadir, 12 successors and etc if you'd like
I think.
For some reason the comment section seems empty here. If the evidence for this martyrdom is so scant, I wonder when and how this idea took hold within the Shii community.
You should do a response video to "Orthodox Shahada" They get so many things wrong about Islam it is laughable.
@Farid plzk give us the reference of that alkafi Hadith About Fatima SA travelling to Uhud Graveyard
Google the words verbatim. It is in al-Kafi in a chapter about grave visitation.
@@FaridResponds not able to find yet :( can you paste the link directly
Pls bro keep this channel for non muslims
No.
@@FaridResponds K it's ur hikmah and ijtihad
Btw love u n the work you are doing
@@furqanshariff Thanks. ;)
12 er shia majority are non muslims
Shias are non muslims
Bit hard when Omar didn't allow anyone to record hadith bro
Shia hadith were written post Omar.
It's hard when you're faking and amputating narratives to change meaning. Have you ever asked yourself when Omar said it and why؟
ماشاءالله تبارك الله
There's nothing like authentic in 12vers
How can one believe that Hazrat Abu Bakr R.A or Hazrat Umar R.A killed Hazrat Fatima R.A and Hazrat Ali R.A or their Children did nothing?
And the fact that Prophet Muhammed S.a.w.w. said Hazrat Abu Bakr R.A and Hazrat Umar R.A are among the people of Jannah?
To think that closest Companions of Prophet Muhammed S.a.w.w. were hypocrites is straight up stupid.
Ali hated Omar so much that he gave him his daughter's hand in marriage. (Taqyah or love?)
Ali hated Omar, Abu Bakr and Uthman to the point that he named his children Omar, Abu Bakr and Uthman. (Taqyah or love?)
Ali was known for his bravery especially in wars but let Omar and Abu Bakr enter his house in his presence and beat his wife and kill his child and despite this Ali named his sons Omar and Abu Bakr. (Taqyah or love?)
Imam Zain al-Abideen (4th Imam) hated Omar to the point that he named his son Omar al Ashraf. (Taqyah or love?)
Imam al-Hussein ibn Ali ibn Abi Tâlib gave the name of Omar to his son in revenge on Omar Ibn Alkhattab. (Taqyah or love?)
Imam Ja'far al-Sadiq (6th Imam) gave the name of Aisha to his own daughter. (Taqyah or love?)
Imam Musa Al Kadhim (7th Imam) hated Aisha so much that he gave his daughter his name. (Taqyah or love?)
Imam Ridha hated Aisha so much that he also named her his daughter Aisha. (taqyah or love?)
Imam Ali al-Hadi (10th Imam) hated Aisha and as proof of this hatred he named his daughter Aisha. (Taqyah or love?)
If the Shias really follow their imams as they claim, they should have imotated them by calling their sons and daughters: Abu Bakr, Omar, Othman, Aicha ...
The Shias of today are liars saying that they pursue their imams but they pursue Satan and that is why they are not considered as Muslims ... they insult the mothers of Muslims and the wives of our prophet, they also insult almost all of our prophet's companions, they say that the Quran is falsified, they have their own cults which have nothing to do with Islam ...
Allahümme bareek
I'll answer this insha Allah.
@@HiHi-ek1dd stop spamming every chat with the same message.
@@ridovercascade4551 Wdym im trying to give the answer.
@@HiHi-ek1dd where is the answer? You only write in shaa Allah and no answer.
Salam alaikum Farid! Sorry I haven't responded in a while. Let's do a video together insha Allah.
Google results on walking with broken rib
Most broken ribs resolve within six weeks. You'll need to take it easy during this time, but you should still be able to walk around and do your daily activities. If you find that the pain isn't getting any better, see a doctor to rule out any additional injuries that could be causing your symptoms
I know a person who goes to visit their father in the hospital everyday with a broken rib ... Stays there for hours.
Do they walk for 1 hour + 4 × a week also?
He goes with taxi right?😂
@@Soyodi I'm pretty sure the average human walks more than that.
@@iMan-610 Car 🧐 Who has that much money?!
Shia is way better then Ali r.a. even saydina ali r.a pledge allegiance to his friend saydina abu bakar and umar r.a but not the shia. They think they know better the relationship between those prophet muhammad s.a.w companion then saydina ali himself.
Ameen
waiting for apuss series.....
firstly, the last hadith Farid brought was an extremly dumb argument. She went to the graves before being attacked and stopped after she no longer could. Also there is a reason why Farid is constantly repeating that he wants only one hadith. He claims he is making it easier, lol, who r u making fun of? He does this so he can cope with that single chain and play around that one hadith, but the truth is, we have HUNDREDS of different chains about the attack, HUNDREDS!
what else is tawatur?
hundreds of broken weak chains doesn't make a sahih one. with that logic a 100 years from now we could fabricate anything we want if we rile enough people today. plus wdym the last statement is dumb. what are you on. it states 'every'. you don't think one of your most important scholars would state 'every week before the attack'. no. it states EVERY FRIDAY and prior to that clearly mentions she was alive for 75 days. again, 3 shia scholars came together and were refuted by farid using your own books. May Allah guide you.
Alhum'dulillah
The actual video is 40 minutes long and his refutation is 20 minutes long I am sure he's going to cover all the points