Road Test: 2012 Mercedes-Benz C250 Sport Coupe

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 6 сен 2024
  • MotorWeek road test review of the 2012 Mercedes-Benz C250 Sport Coupe.

Комментарии • 103

  • @extremedrivr
    @extremedrivr 2 года назад +14

    You guys made my day!! Thank you for this video because I am the proud new owner of a 2013 Coupe.
    I love every mile I drive it. Awesome car!!

    • @noemitellez3098
      @noemitellez3098 2 года назад +2

      Updates ? How’s it holdin up?

    • @extremedrivr
      @extremedrivr 2 года назад +3

      @@noemitellez3098 Still good. No complaints here.

  • @sleeksilver
    @sleeksilver 12 лет назад +8

    Yeah, I was thinking that the 0-60 was wayyy off.
    Motorweek actually has great reviews, they did mention they couldn't get traction though.

  • @sleeksilver
    @sleeksilver 12 лет назад +3

    It is a 1.8 turbo, not a 2.5.
    Other publications have clocked low 6 second 0-60 times. They even had a disclaimer that it was traction limited.
    Did you even watch the whole video???

  • @1970borntorun
    @1970borntorun 3 года назад +4

    You know, it's interesting. I just went from a 2013 G37x sedan to a 2014 C Class Sport Sedan 4Matic, and I'm still adjusting to the slightly numb electric steering. This isn't a "criticism" per se, more of an observation. That G37 model, or better yet, an E90-era 3 Series would provide the most steering feel, but the Benz DOES feel very precise and refined, so I guess it's a pretty fair trade :)

  • @MrTONYTONYM
    @MrTONYTONYM 12 лет назад +5

    how is it a waste of money? C300's V6 engine consumes at least 15L per 100km and is only nearly as fast as C250 sedan. Sure you can say C300 sounds nicer but with every inch of throttle you push comes with a heavy price of gas. And besides i don't think it would cause you some big troubles if you are driving a C250 and arrive to work just a few seconds later than C300.

  • @adrianniemiec8669
    @adrianniemiec8669 2 года назад +2

    I believe it is capable of less than 7.9 0-60. Properly broken in , I say 7.

  • @IKhanNot
    @IKhanNot 11 лет назад +2

    In terms of features you're right. The thing is though that all electronic gadgets is just one aspect of a car. The Benz will ride nice and heavy, be quieter, have a more luxurious interior and feel more effortless all around which is what makes a Benz a Benz. You can't compare the 2 anyway and features like whether I can plug my iPod in or not doesn't make one car better than the other.

  • @AD-sp5cv
    @AD-sp5cv 2 года назад +2

    i remember beating the hell out of one of these in my 2014 camry hybrid le LOL he was llivd but i kept pulling no matte what the speedd

  • @fredsalfa
    @fredsalfa 5 лет назад +6

    Should do 0-60 in 7.2 secs in Australian version anyway

  • @mlps93
    @mlps93 12 лет назад

    you only get that on the luxury versions
    they took it off for the sports version to make it look more sporty and improve aerodynamics

  • @MIAthe305
    @MIAthe305 12 лет назад +1

    its a real let down that we dont get exhaust on both sides...how much would it cost after market to get exhaust on both sides?

  • @59summerset
    @59summerset 11 лет назад +1

    The Focus is actually quieter at 70mph. 65db vs 68db for the Merc. You won't notice much of a difference besides losing that v6, but a ST Focus will outrun anything apart from the AMG.

  • @JuanDG93
    @JuanDG93 10 лет назад +4

    my turbo sometimes stop working after setting off a light or accelerating a little hard for like 10 min and i have to turn off the car and wait i don't know if this happens to anyone else with this car.... and my c250 sport sedan does the quarter mile in 15 secs at 94 mph!! and 0-60 in around 6.8 secs !!

  • @FicoBezKocnicaBL
    @FicoBezKocnicaBL 12 лет назад +5

    Well they should have done it on another day. This car is faster than 7.9 sec to 60.

  • @ArnoldWatson
    @ArnoldWatson 12 лет назад +1

    Very nice car and far better than the 2002 attempt for sure.

  • @matdamond
    @matdamond 12 лет назад +3

    looks nice

  • @realchimera
    @realchimera 12 лет назад +1

    You can't compare this car with 2012 bimmer3. That car is so good. It has no competition at least for 2012.

  • @bmwmsport11
    @bmwmsport11 12 лет назад

    What's a better buy? Honda civic SI or Mercedes Benz C250 coupe? They put the same power, but the only difference is the power train and brand class

  • @59summerset
    @59summerset 12 лет назад

    I cross shopped a Focus with the C class. The new Titanium trim can go for $30,000 and you're getting more equipment than you would in the Mercedes.

  • @bmwmsport11
    @bmwmsport11 12 лет назад

    it was asking more like "should i get RWD luxury over FWD entry-level" wasnt comparing driving specs, features etc.
    i know that they are NOT competiators. if i was comparing i would have replaced Honda civic with BMW 328i

  • @Trades46
    @Trades46 12 лет назад

    It's not a 2.5L on this newer model. 2012 and beyond C250 uses a 1.8L Turbo 4 cylinder.
    You are right though. My 2011 model with a 2.5 V6 is lethargic. Car's too heavy for the 201hp and 181lb/ft engine to haul.

  • @Jeremandre
    @Jeremandre 12 лет назад +1

    ITS NOT a 3.8!!!! its a 5.3 LS4.303 hp 330lbft of torque

  • @Insanity_Crow
    @Insanity_Crow 12 лет назад

    This is kind of sad when you consider Motorweeks own test of the 2012 Focus showed faster 0-60 times. Granted I'd rather have the Merc, but this to me says buy the 350 or pass. Either one you buy is going to break a lot though.

  • @IKhanNot
    @IKhanNot 11 лет назад

    Lol where did you read that? If 65dB is correct for the Focus then it cruises quieter than a Lexus ES350 which is probably one of the quietest cars for the price. I haven't driven a Focus so I can't really comment on it but still the Focus and Benz will have 2 different types of feel to them which cater to 2 different kind of customers. I've driven a C300 which was amazing but that's the kind of car that caters to what I like in a car.

  • @MrTONYTONYM
    @MrTONYTONYM 12 лет назад

    yeah i guess some people prefers the serenity and the sheer smoothness of the V6 over the turbo4. But if i were to get a V6 C-class, I would be a C350 not a C300 lol

  • @siamiam
    @siamiam 12 лет назад

    their not testing the cars to sell the cars, they are testing them to give a factual report on the car, you cant always take the best times from a test to base what it will do ,some times you have to take all the numbers from various sources to get an overall average
    over the past few decades they have had performance times that were slower and faster then other testers
    you use the sit as an example ,the 90 esprit they tested was quicker then other testers back in the day

  • @kevinon22s
    @kevinon22s 12 лет назад

    "It's a clean car if you want the sporty look close to the C63 coupe with the economy of a 1.8 inline 4 with the AMG wheels and good looks, speed is not what this car is for, if your like me and have tons of speeding tickets for driving a fast car,you would like this car its for you."

  • @pontiacGXPfan
    @pontiacGXPfan 12 лет назад

    Unless you like the thrumming and buzzing of a 4-banger in addition to the whooshing of a turbo. Which is why i recommend the C300. People seem to forget that fuel economy depends on how the car is driven and not always the factory ratings.

  • @mike88g1
    @mike88g1 12 лет назад

    I saw a 350 take off next to meand i was in my mach 1... They have crazy grip at take off

  • @Raffix394
    @Raffix394 12 лет назад

    Why "especially if it's a German car"? the word coupé is of Frence origin, in German the word is "Stufenheck-Limousine" .

  • @siamiam
    @siamiam 12 лет назад

    different cars, different weather conditions, different tracks etc etc......

  • @bmwmsport11
    @bmwmsport11 12 лет назад

    Nice car. Though the price is abit too high. I really wish the generation after this doesn't steer me away from this generation. That way the a used one wouldn't be so bad. Good vid

  • @aayonce4
    @aayonce4 8 лет назад +1

    are these things reliable ?

  • @onoff314
    @onoff314 12 лет назад +2

    This engine is more powerful than your 3.8 LOL! STAY REKT

  • @troyka86
    @troyka86 12 лет назад

    No HID's? 16.1 sec 1/4 mile? Nearly 40 Grand? No wonder it will only make up 10% of their C class sales.

  • @sleeksilver
    @sleeksilver 12 лет назад +7

    Are you seriously comparing a Civic to a Mercedes?
    If you have to ask, you aren't even in the target market.

  • @YankeemanLT
    @YankeemanLT 12 лет назад +1

    I'd have disagree with this Mercedes decision. They've had it on 190, w202, w203. Its something that makes the car stand out. And the star they've put on this one is way too big. In my opinion, every Merc should come with it.

  • @blaboy2012
    @blaboy2012 12 лет назад

    BMW can get their 2.0T to produce 240hp with much quicker times. plus it gets 36mpg on the highway

  • @autonathan
    @autonathan 12 лет назад

    I would take a 328i Coupe over this if I wanted a "sporty" car, but if I wanted a luxury coupe, I would get the C350.

  • @massey706
    @massey706 11 лет назад

    Yea because the CL didn't have two doors...

  • @importcarenthusiast
    @importcarenthusiast 12 лет назад

    I really miss the old hatchback. i want one so badly.... or rather, I dont, cause theyre unreliable, but still..

  • @FooFightor1
    @FooFightor1 12 лет назад +3

    7.9 sec 0-60 LOL that's on par with a base model corolla

  • @IKhanNot
    @IKhanNot 12 лет назад

    Meh just put the extra money in and get the C350. You won't lost out on too much real world fuel economy and get a ton more power to go with that wonderful solid ride this car gives. I test drove an 08 C350 and it has a great blend of power and comfort.

  • @pontiacGXPfan
    @pontiacGXPfan 12 лет назад

    Even if MB does have prior experience with 4-banger cars in Europe, this isn't Europe. The C250 is a waste of money as are all 4-banger powered sport sedans. The C300 is better except it is now AWD only.

  • @andrenj1970
    @andrenj1970 12 лет назад

    nice but the base engine is useless for the $ compared to the competition

  • @Jeremandre
    @Jeremandre 12 лет назад

    ohh i understand..........but i always thought mercedes built bigger and more powerful engines..........and btw its 5.3 v8 LS4..........it never came to mind that Merc would build such a little engine.........thats all

  • @mluu510
    @mluu510 12 лет назад +1

    fugly headlights. screw benz are wanting to charge more for projectors. hell, screw them for charging ~$450 just for split & fold seats. this is why i'll never buy germany luxury.

  • @donbosco0101
    @donbosco0101 12 лет назад +3

    Mine in a year.

    • @HighFidelityFox
      @HighFidelityFox 4 года назад

      Did you get it ,,

    • @donbosco0101
      @donbosco0101 4 года назад

      Zzyzx Fox yep. Extremely unreliable. I’m glad I leased it. I’ll get a Toyota suv next lol

    • @saleemjavaid8870
      @saleemjavaid8870 4 года назад

      Hey bro. How unreliable was it? Imma grad student and I found a cheap 2012 c250 coupe with very low miles one owner. Has accident though but no airbags deployed.

    • @HighFidelityFox
      @HighFidelityFox 4 года назад

      Saleem Javaid k currently have a 2013 c260 and have only had one issue.
      The fuel injector valve malfunctioned and was causing the car to stall when going from highway speeds to slower speeds. Set me back USD 250 but have had zero problems since then

    • @donbosco0101
      @donbosco0101 4 года назад

      Saleem Javaid I was having oil pump problems right after the first year, Mercedes took care of it. And then it was the transmission jerking when going from a higher speed to a stop. They put a rebuilt which did the same thing. I might a got a lemon, but considering how much I would have to pay if I owned it, I decided to not get any german technology unless I lease it.

  • @CynicalBastard511
    @CynicalBastard511 5 лет назад

    The C250 is SLOWER than the diesel E250 Bluetec.

  • @1979irock
    @1979irock 12 лет назад +1

    Nice passenger seat controls
    Fail

    • @1970borntorun
      @1970borntorun 3 года назад

      Yes Moron, because THAT'S a good reason not to buy this car lol

  • @timtime88
    @timtime88 12 лет назад

    slower than i expected.

  • @DamienRasheed
    @DamienRasheed 12 лет назад

    This performance is not as great as they are being made out to be. Especially with the performance BMW managed out of their 4 cylinder. I'm a Benz dude, and I still have to give nod to the Bimmer. SMH

  • @1SirCarlton
    @1SirCarlton 12 лет назад

    well this is America where its predominantly pronounced coupe (coop).

  • @KhrissyDaDon
    @KhrissyDaDon 12 лет назад

    I like the sedan better.

  • @BMan100
    @BMan100 12 лет назад

    hmm this or my challenger srt8.. mmmm yeah challenger.

  • @mcximus
    @mcximus 12 лет назад

    0-60 in 7.9 sec..I think the baby bimmer will be home already by that time. Merc and base 3 series are price competitively too. Merc is 40 hp behind the baby bimmer too. My money is on the bimmer

  • @techdude6693
    @techdude6693 12 лет назад

    I agree. I like Japanese lux cars better. More value and better reliability.
    I think If I could buy a luxury car right now, It'd probably be the Acura TL SH-AWD w/ manual and tech package haha

  • @MAV_DJ
    @MAV_DJ 10 лет назад +7

    my c250 goes from 0-60 in 5 seconds....

    • @kimoceanfamily123
      @kimoceanfamily123 9 лет назад +3

      Is your C250 (1.8L turbo 4 cylinder) stock or tuned? Even with Stage 1 burger motorsports tuning and hardware installs, it's impossible to crack 6 seconds with the C250.

    • @shakeandbake808
      @shakeandbake808 9 лет назад +1

      Vilar04 I really doubt that…fastest I've gotten mine to go is around 6.5 to 60 with a 2500 rpm launch.

    • @MAV_DJ
      @MAV_DJ 9 лет назад

      ***** oh i don't care about the 250 i have a cla 45 amg now which is way better

    • @baltasaar
      @baltasaar 7 лет назад +1

      Vilar04 My C250 Coupe in 0-100 takes 5.9 in sport and in comfort 6.6

    • @ColinCindricvideos
      @ColinCindricvideos 7 лет назад +2

      Ive done 0-60 in about 5.7-5.9, and mine is the coupe w/sport plus. If you launch this car right, then itll reward you.

  • @realchimera
    @realchimera 12 лет назад +1

    7.9s...This 2.5L engine is as weak as Lexus IS250

  • @Howie262
    @Howie262 12 лет назад +1

    You're right about performance, but as far as build quality, Mercedes trumps new bmw's..
    the new 325i is amazing though, i think it gets close to 40mpg while still 0-60 in the high 5 second range...
    Id have either, but clearly Benz has gotten a whole lot better with quality and reliability even to rival lexus fags..
    I think this coop is pure secks looking, even though i wouldn't go for anything less then an AMG..

  • @Touchgrassdork
    @Touchgrassdork 12 лет назад

    $500 more u can get a g37 coupe,,,sorry this aint cutting it for me.

  • @Sanpedranoazul
    @Sanpedranoazul 12 лет назад

    The Civic coupe´s behind looks exactly the same :O

  • @MrHeadshot1982
    @MrHeadshot1982 12 лет назад

    I take the new lexus GS

    • @1970borntorun
      @1970borntorun 3 года назад

      Have a ball in your Sleep-Inducing Lexus lol

  • @1979irock
    @1979irock 12 лет назад

    You guys are nerds with your french vs. drama mercedes are over priced by $18k

  • @Kaiser187
    @Kaiser187 12 лет назад

    LMFAO @ 7.9 seconds 0-60

  • @vvysoc
    @vvysoc 12 лет назад

    my tl would destroy this car wow

    • @1970borntorun
      @1970borntorun 3 года назад +1

      Yeah, well, you're in a plasticky, FWD Chassis Japanese sedan that is pretending to be a BMW or Benz, so there's that .... LOL

  • @Jeremandre
    @Jeremandre 12 лет назад

    WOW!!! My 08 impala ss could beat this thing

    • @Von715
      @Von715 3 года назад

      Its luxury sedan not a race car u punk

  • @sab0nes
    @sab0nes 12 лет назад

    It looks like a Honda Accord from the side.

  • @Little199
    @Little199 12 лет назад

    Great review, but the car is off of my list now. too weak

  • @blacuraRL
    @blacuraRL 12 лет назад

    3rd, but who the hell cares?

  • @zendaro
    @zendaro 12 лет назад +1

    First!!!

  • @hong99sm
    @hong99sm 12 лет назад

    slow!

  • @YankeemanLT
    @YankeemanLT 12 лет назад +1

    no "external" mercedes star on the hood? Come on mercedes, don't cheap out on your image. Seeing the star from inside is what makes you feel just a little nicer about driving a merc. Not approved.

    • @57RollsRoycePhantom
      @57RollsRoycePhantom 4 года назад

      YankeemanLT exactly! This one would look great w/ the standing star! How unique is that? Only coupe that still does the ornament is RR.

  • @90Mrknowitall
    @90Mrknowitall 8 лет назад +1

    Mercedes don't age well at all nice cars just looks dated fast

    • @Diego_Barrr
      @Diego_Barrr 5 лет назад +3

      meh not this one though. It looks great in 2019

    • @57RollsRoycePhantom
      @57RollsRoycePhantom 4 года назад +2

      2020 and 204 line stills looks very modern. One of the best they’ve ever designed. Timeless.