Why is Britain sending asylum seekers to Rwanda? | Inside Story
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 8 сен 2024
- Being smuggled from France to Britain by boat could earn you a one-way ticket to Rwanda.
That's the British government's message to undocumented migrants making the dangerous voyage across the English Channel.
The Prime Minister says action is needed to stop what he calls 'vile people smugglers'.
Rights groups compare it to Australia's 'offshore processing' policy, which they've condemned as cruel and inhumane.
So will Britain's agreement work?
Presenter: Mohammed Jamjoom
Guests:
Maya Goodfellow - Author, 'Hostile Environment: How Immigrants Became Scapegoats'.
Natalie Hodgson - University of Nottingham
Emilie McDonnell - Human Rights Watch
Kolbassia Haoussou - Freedom from Torture
- Subscribe to our channel: aje.io/AJSubscribe
- Follow us on Twitter: / ajenglish
- Find us on Facebook: / aljazeera
- Check our website: www.aljazeera....
#AlJazeeraEnglish #InsideStory #Rwanda #UnitedKingdom
Thank you very much Rwanda for your cooperation.
This migrants problem is because 25 countries 13 in Africa have sanctions. Sanctions are showing to be a human rights violation
No , this probrem occurs becouse those trying to "illegally" cross border are not treated as invaders- which they are.
Stop with your false narrative!
@@pod11th31 No,this problem occurs because you let leaders of your countries invade other countries and plunder their resources like Libya. You let it happen coz you share the spoils with your govt. Who are the criminals now?
@@minefazz4223 How is it a false narrative?
That gentleman is saying that he wanted protection, why did he cross at least 5 safe countries to get to you wasn't he safe in Greece or Italy, then he says he was surprised when uk authorities put him in detention, he was interning a country illegally was he expecting a red carpet. The worst thing is the host didn't even asked him why did you have to travel to UK specially when you were safe in other countries on the way.
Shahzad amir,I was surprised to read your name,reading your comment I thought it would be an Englishman writing,I u r in the UK I wonder how you got there and why are you there
I think this was exactly what they thought when they encountered the British in their countries. Colonisation and annexation of resources starting to come back to you.
He not just looking for safety from guns, he want safety from poverty too I don’t want to be safe and hungry lol don’t judge people bro
What do you classify as a safe country do you know what Italy is doing to asylum seekers go look at the many documentaries I don’t agree with some of the things the guy said but I guess you just showed how many Arabs think about Africans that’s why I’m ashamed when I see millions of them committed to Islam where they are not welcome
These countries push them towards the UK.
Why would Rwanda agree to such a scheme?I wanna hear the Rwandan view, and in their own words.There has been silence so far.
That is not the first time it was the Israeli who introduced this they send the refugees to Rwanda and Uganda so it is Israeli design
Because they are be given lots of money.
Oh, I did not know the history. Why is the media behaving then as if this is a Brtitish programme if Rwanda offered this service?Steupes.
@@maxisussex which will benefit who
@@tangaz5819 Go ask the Rwandese government.
Those seeking asylum are economic migrants. Decades ago, Europe was a favorite place for many such migrants because the system was made it easy for such migrants.
Some statistics said 63% coming during this period are valid asylum seekers.
If al Jazeera has a problem maybe it's better to send them to Qatar?
😂😂😂
It's a news channel just like a shopping mall. No issues here
Best Comment ❤
Illegal migrants, according to BoJo come from elsewhere rather than Europe. He is forgetting that Europe is the cause of all these turmoil in countries of Africa, for example through slavery, colonialism, neo-colonialism and more recent turmoils such as in Syria, Libya, Ethiopia, etc.
100%
Africans and Arabs had vibrant slave trading for millennia.
If Rwanda is not ok, then lets Qatar and other rich country take them. You just make official request to the government
No any migrants entering the country illegally regardless of their home country would be treated the same. Ukrainians are coming through the approved channels via embassies just like the same for Afgans & Hong Kongers who came through the approved embassies.
@@shap7866 if you mean for Britain I’ve talked to people who say policy is absolutely the same for everyone though it’s implementation shifted over time.
What's cruel and inhuman is putting up with this. They are economic migrants with zero respect for laws, country or women. I would like to thank Rwanda!
Why not stay in France or the outher safe countries they cross to get to the uk, Its easy its called social security, dole etc and free housing. Its about time the Goverment did the right thing and they have.
These economic migrants don't respect the laws.
That was how they came to South Africa , from refugees to owners of the land . Rwanda is GONE
May Rwanda collect the illegals overcrowding South Africa, please. They are from Nigeria, Zimbabwe, Mozambique, Ethiopia, Somalia, Pakistan, Serbia, Congo DRC, they are from all over the world.
The white man owns south Africa
@@nyabinghi870 “ white man” no person is white . They are pale , red , yellow or grey. They taught people to call them white to feel superior, they are not
@@nyabinghi870 True. The white man owns South Africa in much the same way as he owns all of Africa and the world.
Literally the majority of people I’ve seen support this
The UNHCR is a bad joke. The protocol for refugees is that they are supposed to identify themselves and seek asylum in the first signatory nation they enter, not sneak into a country, pass through other signatory countries, and sneak into a final country where, when caught, seek asylum.
Purposeful poor choice in interview panel where no contrasting opinions have been provided.
Thats not law, its not in the refugee convention unless you can show me.
At least they sneaked in, not marched up to the front door with a cannon.
The assylum seeker departure centre was fresh out of brochures so they didn't know
What is international law? The UK has a right for national security against illegal. The policy should succeed as Denmark and Israel found success to outsource asylum process. All failed illegal should be sent to Rwanda. People without the right to remain in the UK should be sent to Rwanda.
Priti Patel and Rushi Sunak should be the first to be deported back to Uganda, along with their parents and grandparents. And you Sir should be on the next flight back to Malaya
How lovely an Indian leading other immigrants away!
She is doing good for Britain
Good, fed up of them
Good for the locals.....agree⁉️
Yes, Africans should take care of their own people and treat them well.
Why refugees from Africa have to end in Ukraine when Africa is so big? Take care of your own with dignity and love. That's responsibility.
Very good idea Africa should take care of theirs, and also the western world should also stop exploiting Africa natural resources and rule divide system.
You are scandalously ignorant. Most of those that the British govt is targeting are Afghans, Syrians and Iraqis. Africans living in Ukraine are students. Do your findings before you come on and chat your racist hogwash online.
You fool the make a lot of money the don’t take it for free the give money over billion dollar and much more
Ukrainian sent to Rwanda 😂😂😂 no that is not going to happen. Its just for the people who pay smugglers to sneak into the UK....
To avoid being sent their, all they need to do is apply for asylum correctly 😉
Funnily enough the UK signed a treaty in 1951 that says a ding on the shore is one of the ways that is right.
Then the UK passed a law violating that treaty but they are still signed onto the treaty .
Boris and Priti are breaking their own laws again
I think this is only applies to dark skinned people. Not the white poor people from Ukraine. Of course they get to stay!
@@beautifulone5509 Ukrainians are Europeans, so it's obvious they should be welcome anywhere in Europe, not dark skin aka non europeans
@@beautifulone5509 Ukrainian's are refugees fleeing a war zone.
The majority of the illegal immigrants Britain will send to Rwanda are illegal immigrants who are not refugees.
Agreed
Whats the problem? Rwanda is a lovely place. Respect for them participating in this.
It’s about time the government did something the numbers of people coming across is unsustainable
Do u know how far and how many Brits crossed to Africa during your colonial era? In fact the solution is simple, stop going around the global causing wars, genocides, overthrowing governments and see if anyone will come to your country. do you really understand how much those people actually love their countries? If it wasn't all of the above mentioned problems that you bring to their nations, I swear not even in a dream they would wish even to visit your country
Same can be said for Ukrainians
They have no right to demand to be allowed to live in another country, especially when they have been caught trying to enter another country illegally.
If they are prepared to break the law trying to enter a country, how likely is it that they will obey the law when they actually live in their chosen country??
By your logic the British Empire was illegal ! Well done...
@@gorillanobaka9772 it was, duh
by your logic, you have no right to leave your house. all people should be free to move anywhere on Earth. Countries are just dictator-made things.
good idea. Britain is an island. it's not some large expanse like Russia or China. 1950's refugee convention is outdated.
Dreadful ethics u have
Rwanda is 9 times smaller than Britain.
If these migrants are fleeing persecution this a fantastic opportunity for them. If they’re economic migrants that’s bad luck then.
Rwanda 🇷🇼 is 6th safest country globally, 4th least corrupt country in Africa and 2rd in Africa & 29th globally according to WEF as the easiest place to do business, 5th safest country globally for woman to move safely at night
Source : trust me bro!
Keep you safeness to yourself rwanda is a dictatorship country who have long history of genocide and inequality no freedom of expression or what so ever
Why u lying tho ain’t point of lying🤦🏽♂️
That's propaganda. It's just business .
I am rwandese , do u know how many rwandese refugees in the world? How many rwandese leave the country per year? We know kagame is white agent. Every body who want to do bad things to Africa , they ask a help to kagame and of course pay him.
But not for gays homosesual right u forgot that how is rwanda Street going to react when men start holding hands o the street of rwanda tell me many will be coming trust me,no one is talking about that
Why not just be honest and say we don't want any Asylum Seekers, unless they come from the Ukraine. Are all asylum seekers equal?
asylum seekers need to go to the nearest safe country they can. there are no countries that border the uk except ireland so we dont need to take anyone in, not even ukrainians, they should go to poland, slovakia etc
One asylum is white and one is black. That is the difference!
No nothing to do with colour you racist . difference is one is fleeing war the other is coming from safe France do you get it now?
No all asylum seekers are not equal. Some refugees will never integrate to the society after multiple generations
@@sunshine7453 Exactly
The UK is overstretched, so I've heard. There is no feasible way that anyone has a 'right' to be in a nation that is not theirs. This has gone on in the US for too long as well and this political behavior of treating the land and welfare system as some kind of smorgasbord has to end.
Agreed. However, it will be better if these so-called civilised countries keep their noses out of other people's businesses. Libya was doing just fine until the do-gooders stuck their noses in. Even under the former dictator, Saddam Hussein, Iraq was stable, thriving and getting on with daily business until the shameful UK and US governments decided to invade. That torpedoed the security and lives of thousands of people. Afghanistan was the same. Nonetheless, one good thing that came out of these catastrophic wars is that the West is so weak and vulnerable, and the so-called Military might they claim they have is a complete farce.
It's not illegal. It's a legal way to handle a problem and stop illegal trafficking. If they don't want to go to Rwanda then they should stay away from the UK.
Shame on you ur inhuman person u can not giving anykindness to people.
@Critical Thinker "It's not illegal. It's a legal way to handle a problem and stop illegal trafficking. If they don't want to go to Rwanda then they should stay away from the UK." How does this affect the people smugglers? They will continue to ply their trade; convincing desperate people that this is temporary or some such lie, we forfeited our influence over any EU decision by leaving, now we have no say in Eu policy. Change you handle to : Naïve Bumpkin"
Critical Thinkker: You said if the assylum seekers don't want to go to Rwanda they should stay away from the UK. Have you forgotten that,the UK supported and participated in the US-led invasions of Iraq in 2003, Libya in 2011, and the war in Syria. If UK does not want assylum seekers in the UK, then they must stop inciting and supporting wars abroad. Perhaps developing countries should start to arm insurgents like the IRA to cause insecurity and civil war in the UK so that the British can also start to seek assylum abroad. Would you be happy?
😃😂😃😂
Why people are so racist to the people of Africa? Rwanda is a good place with good people, way better than any non-black dominated nation, therefore sending asylum seekers to Africa is for the good sake for those asylum seekers.
Why they come in illegal way.
@@user-vw6bk4pb4l got it. Thank u
Exactly
It’s a dismissive attitude towards Africa generally. More than anything it laziness about learning more.
Terrible move and security risk for Rwanda in the long term for UK's historic failed asylum seekers policies.
Brits dont want them either
UK must stop thinking Rwanda is their Colony and Prison where they can send refugees whom they think are Criminals.
During British Imperialism they used to send criminals from their former colonies to America. UK must give up its Colonial Mindset and Ego of thinking they can do whatever they like.
I think most (if not all of those) African migrants are peaceful and are just looking for a better life; naively thought Europe is the best place to go for a better life
UK made a great deal! Hate when some people feel entitled to jump the line and illegally invade other countries. They can always go back home if Rwanda don’t suit them.
Can always stay in Europe
@@Decoy1957 Blacks are not welcome, didn't you know ???
You must be stupid
Leftists basically won’t accept any constraints on illegal immigration. They’ll always say the accommodations are insufficient and the treatment is racist. They rarely will have a conversation about the topic that gets specific.
Jump the line you say?? You guys are simply getting rid of the black and Arab while making way for the blue eyes and blond hair Ukrainian period. It’s all hypocrisy
600 in one day is crazy …can’t blame the Brits,Europe can’t take the population of Africa in.
We just want their wealth...!
@@AAA-pv7zf Africans don't have wealth. They want ours. But without hard work or skills to get it so play the race card. Pathetic.
@@AAA-pv7zf hence why there trying to keep you out
If Rwanda is inhumane, they can stay in France… it’s lovely there…
Considering the skill sets of these refugees I expect the national health service of Rwanda will greatly improve and a space industry will quickly develop. Rwanda wins big!
Your sarcasm has not gone unnoticed.
A new Great Silicon Rift Valley.
@@SeeLasSee Well, your sarcasm has not gone unnoticed. Leading Western nations dont not have a monopoly on intelligence. If anything, whatever they touch particularly in recent times turns out to be a disaster. the profound disaster they caused in Libya, Iraq and Afghanistan etc are classic examples.
@@adetolaayodele3425 it’s not sarcasm.
to try and stop them from crossing the channel illegally
To distabilise DRC and find a reason to split it into so many small countries then legally loot its minerals
👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽
Exactly
Ahh Europeans always plotting I see 😔
Yeah it was a horrid 10 years for the asylum seekers in Australia. The only good that came of it was stopping the people smugglers. Arrested and jailed some. Work was also done in shri lanka to educate the people not to believe the smugglers. So many people drowned!!
Why were people trying to illegally invade another country- Australia? Australia did right putting them on an offshore island.
@@minefazz4223 so but didn't Europeans come to Australia and commit a genocide against the indigenous folk there ? a bit hypocritical kf you ask me
BoJo’s perspective, first of all, is that these are not refugees. Sending the migrants to Rwanda is not a gesture of magnanimity on the part of Britain; they are trying to remove migrants because of the concern that British people will ultimately be black washed. Rather than Britain, it is Rwanda that must be put on the spot. Once again it is not about being magnanimous, otherwise, Rwanda would be taking all refugees, Africans, Asians and Arabs. Rwanda must stop being disingenuous and tell all, including the Rwandans, what this is all about, could it be because of money?
Honestly this is extremely humiliating on the part of Rwanda. Many of these "refugees" are economic migrants and just look at Sweden right now, they have no intention of integration. Wait until Rwanda is filled with 30,000 people with zero respect for the local culture, racist and a superiority complex. Look what is happening in Sweden right now. Is Rwanda really capable of handling that?
Come on, these people you call economic refugees come from countries that have been destabilised or bombed by countries in the West! Therefore the western countries should take responsibility for the people who have to leave because of the actions of your countries.
If you don’t people to come, maybe not meddle in other countries 🤔
Ethnic compositions will change around the world but it must be gradual to preserve destiny character and diversity between nations. If the UK did not want non-Europeans, it’s taken in like 5 million too many in recent decades. Your talk rings hollow somehow.
These are not refugees, these are ehtnic minorities.
Respects to the Rwandan president for doing the deal. It really has made a lot of Brits happy.
Made you happy you mean. Immigrants should be allowed to stay in the UK.
The ancestors of the Brits should have gotten the same treated when they migrated illegally to African countries, the Americas, and the Caribbean.
@@coz2j69 This is the mistake Africans always made Too damm friendly to people accross the ocean like COLUMBUS, and you know how that ended!
@@coz2j69 Caribbean countries are removing the Queen as head of state. Probably in response to the planned repatriation of Caribbean migrants and their offspring.
@@coz2j69 you forgot australia, they literally wiped out the natives and colonized the best lands
Wish Weah and the Liberian government was smart enough to make a deal like this.
Paul kagame is a smart leader
Make Rwanda Great. The vigour of these fighting age men, will be incredibly beneficial for the Rwandan workforce and economy. A real enrichment for Rwanda. Ambitious, and nation building
Visit Rwanda 😂
Rwanda should take the money, and then deport them to the Middle East.
Or force them to where ever their homelands are. Lazy people wanting others to feed them.
Refugees are vulnerable people and the action taken by Boris Johnson is a let down to Great Britain.
@@proton3362 Save the Fake narrative about vulnerable people! You are no longer a refugee the moment you start country-shopping for a country that has the best benefits/money to give!
BUT tell us about the wars going on countries surrounding UK . If you are to speak for the criminals- military aged men & women forcing themselves in UK THROUGH ILLEGAL Channels.
The middle east can then deport them back to UK
Rwanda is good ask someone who is in Rwanda? Aljazeera they are welcome! British official announced that because they investigated that there is no Problem guys
That's not fair. In Rwanda there is no free anything...that is unless England foots the bill.
migrant smuggled to UK has obviously no right whatever and has to accept whatever
Wake up Africa you don't need world
World needs you
Aljazeera asks why, when they are the reporters..
They’re sending the “economic migrants” and the ones that are illegally to Rwanda. They should have no problem since Rwanda is a safe country. Secondly, the majority of asylum seekers pass through many safe countries in order to get to the U.K, why didn’t they apply for asylum there? Thirdly the U.K while sympathetic to asylum seekers cannot take everyone, only people who are under or face threats of persecution.
The first country who introduced is Israel they sent African refugees to Rwanda and Uganda.... the British are applying same principle
This african guy don't know about Rwanda come and VISIT Rwanda before wondering!!!
Rwanda is a lovely country and among the most prosperous in Africa. UK is broke and cannot handle anymore. The refugees will like it there.
Only broke country can accept this immigration deal other countries Rejected this offer
@Boss it would cost more to allow them to stay in Britain. There is better cost benefit by directing them to Rwanda. They can always try going to Sweden.
I paid a ton of money to visit Rwanda and Uganda years ago to trek for gorillas. Amazing and beautiful. I would love to be sent there for free!
@Boss which ever country/s the asylum seeker/s comes from should foot the bill.
Are they sending the brown ones only? Now that they're receiving hundreds of thousands of Ukrainians, I guess they need to make space.
" Leave London for them they said.." against international laws.
The fact that Uk 🇬🇧 send refugees to Rwandan is not effective immediate.There is chance to still be processed and still can go Britain 🇬🇧 as a refugee even in 🇷🇼 Rwanda 🇷🇼.???
I know there is a NAVY law about rescuing any person over the board, but also the safety rules and when you take on the board anyone, then you sink the ship and everyone will drown.
When you enter Anywhere illegally, you expect the consequences. And by the way, those people are Not running from danger, but from Beautiful Democratic France! I understand that it is a Huge problem for France, but anyone can go on the British embassy in Paris and ask for the help. From my country during Communism people used to run over the border, risking of being a shot, and many of them were, and then they were waiting many years in immigration camps to be processed and many of them were also returned.. Year 1989 by the way.
This situation is not ideal, but there is a fact that More you will take in, than Even More will come. And you can see that on the American case. Many people just left their home in South America only because they thought they could. I think that Qatar is a Very Interesting country, but I wonder what would Qatar do if you had thousands of immigrants Without any ID coming in to your country.
Rwandans are all over the world looking for better lives why is their president not think of that first
Why can't Qatar take the responsibility of processing refugee applications?
Humans Are Equals..
Africans - Ukraine - Italian - Yemen -
Etc Etc..
Treat Folks the Same..
Yes, stop racism and hypocrisie against Europeans
Africa is still not a country.
True but borders also exist
the uk treats everyone the same
Being from Scotland I agree that we should be willing to accept a certain amount each year into the country within reason. The sheer amount of people trying to get into this country is unsustainable amd would be detrimental to the economy also we need to eemver not all these migrants are fleeing persecution I know most people like the ones on this panel love to ignore this fact and pretend it isn't real but the fact is a large percentage of the immigrants are only coming to try get a better life here rather than fighting to improve their own countries, but for people who are fleeing a threat to their life should be allowed in.
None of them are in danger in France, so they've no reason to cross into the UK.
@@davidz3879 "They have no reason to come to the uk". they could have family here or they may feel that this is the best place to live because we are meant to be helpful to these people
@@stockimageshrimp Like millions of Brits, I have relatives in other countries. There's no chance that any of those countries would let me move there, then give me welfare benefits, housing etc. on that basis.
Let Rwanda take some money from Britain, it's a Business deal. African asylum seekers will definitely stay in Africa cos they're African but Arabs asylum seekers will be willing to go back the same route.
The one from Israel didn’t stay in Rwanda
We don't want anymore religous nutters that segregate in our country we have enough issues . If they are atheist Liberal they can come. Rwanda is a safe country.
Kagame is sending a strong message, we went from needing shelter to providing shelter and getting hard currency for it to invest in our economy. Kagame is G bro
It would be foolish not to give it a try. There could be benefits. Some migrants really might like Rwanda.
Exactly. Rwanda is needing skills into his newly developed country. It’s a better country than most of East Africa. Kagame is following Singaporean model of rule.
This is a good plan. Spread the immigrants to other countries too like Sierra Leon, Pakistan, India, China, Burkina Faso and more we should help one another.
Great plan! Rwanda is a great country and will benefit with the skills that migrants bring. Welldone Rwanda and Britain!
Africa is a continent not a country, bigger than the USA, china, Canada and Western Europe put together. FYI.
Ask someone who is not Rwandan who is there in Rwanda will tell you the truth how it is beautiful
Kenya was offered the same deal but they shut it down. Find out why and you'll realise why this is a horrible idea.
Kenyatta does not want competition for his property Kenya.
@@julielilote3496 lol competition from refugees? Kenya already has about a million of those.
why specifically uk and they pass through safe countries like France and Germany and Turkey? Rwanda is also safe.. why put themselves in dangerous crossing if they really value their life.. Rwanda is SAFE SINCE THEY ARE LOOKING FOR SAFE COUNTRY...Rwanda is one of the safest country in Africa,, even UK & USA are not safe..
If you're escaping or leaving your country due to whatever reason, you should be able to go to the safest country next you. Getting on the boat 🚢 and Saling to the UK makes you an illegal immigrant not a refugee!
Do u know how far and how many Brits crossed to Africa during your colonial era? In fact the solution is simple, stop going around the global causing wars, genocides, overthrowing governments and see if anyone will come to your country. do you really understand how much those people actually love their countries? If it wasn't all of the above mentioned problems that you bring to their nations, I swear not even in a dream they would wish even to visit your country
Like the way million of British people migrated and colonized the new world, South Africa, Australia, etc?
Priti Patel and Rushi Sunak should be the first to be deported back to Uganda, along with their parents and grandparents
Rwanda is a very good country with good condition of life , they will wait and respect the foregnairs , if you realy escape a war you accept to stay in Rwanda one year , if you are a smart guy you want accept and esclude UK from your list , jhonson have find the system for filter real refugees from smart guys
UK must stop thinking Rwanda is their Colony and Prison where they can send refugees whom they think are Criminals.
During British Imperialism they used to send criminals from their former colonies to America. UK must give up its Colonial Mindset and Ego of thinking they can do whatever they like.
Foreigners
Rwanda needs to open their doors to their neighbours first.
Seems as if the perception of the former colonies are mere “outposts” of the empire is still uppermost in the imperial minds.
Most definitely! 💯
Rwanda was never a British colonial territory, it was a Belgian territory.
Just imagine what China woudl do if the Refugees are at their boundary.. Inhumane - don't think so at least someone is taking care for them. THE TRUTH!
They get 150mil for them so better for them and Britain instant of just flee the country - help the country helping it self..
The nations should be asking China to take in refugee's, since China is so concerned with other countries human rights. Then have ALL media, call China out 24/7 when China refuses.
why? because there are too many immigrants in UK already. and only few have right for asylum.
SO many do not like the truth. Scoialist woke retards who have already done so much damage to the UK in recent decades.
That's not Ruanda's problem
@@thedonn138 they are getting paid big bucks for it so yes now it is their problem and any economic migrant who make it across the channell in a dingy will become Rwandas problem, thank God
@@thedonn138 Ruanda will get money.
@@patc7573 Rwanda will be soon aware that they shot in their own foot signing this agreement and Rwanda becomes second Palestine..
There's plenty of room in England for refugees. There is no housing crisis .
Children are not starving.
families are not using foodbanks.
we are the smallest country where we suppose to put them?!! We don't have enough room for our own crikey!!!
Are you sure about that? Bro it's look like you aren't Rwandan right?
The face he makes when he says there is no safe place in that country 😂😂😂😂
Old colonial criminal always committed crime. ................? ? ?
Because our little island is bursting at the seams and running out of money.
Why in God's sake Arab countries are not taking Refugees in their countries...
These illegal immigrants come UK from Yemen 🤦🏻♂️
why Qutar is not taking them ?
They don't want freeloaders
Why is Rwanda agreeing to this? I get Britain’s reasons but don’t understand why Rwanda wants a flood of asylum seekers in their developing country. 🤷🏿♂️
Cash, cold-hearted cash, @kaydenpat 😏
me too I don't understand
You said it
Rwanda is doing busness
@@user-ec4wh2hr7i I hope it won't bite them later
but why send none Rwandanians to Rwanda? Afghans and Syrians should be sent to their own countries
rwandians dont leave their country mainy middles easterns and nigerians
Refugees should not worry they will be safe warm welcome. The East Africa Region is safe and peaceful
Although legal because of binding UK-Rwanda agreement, it is inhuman and wasteful. The government of Rwanda should have honourably declined the offer regardless of how lucrative it is. It shows how the UK can take advantage of poor states to implement it's immigration and assylum policies. The fomlowing questions need answers from the UK and Rwanda before implementing this inhuman assylum policy: 1- What will happen to assylum seekers whose cases will not be successful? 2- Will Rwanda then grant assylum to the failed UK assylum seekers cases? 3- How much will the people of Rwanda benefit from this inhuman UK assylum processing policy in Rwanda? Is the UK testing it's offshore assylum processing strategy in Rwanda? 4-How will the UNHCR react to this, and will they support it? 5- Has the UK assylum policy failed? The UK supported and participated in the US-led invasions of Iraq in 2003, Libya in 2011, and the war in Syria. If UK does not want assylum seekers in the UK, then they must stop inciting and supporting wars abroad. What if other countries start to arm insurgents like the IRA to cause insecurity and civil war in the UK such that the British will also start to seek assylum abroad. Would the British be happy to be sent to China, Eritrea, Zimbabwe, Uganda, Nigeria or Ghana to await the processing of their assylum cases?
I will respond as much as I can.
1- Every migrants who arrive in Rwanda will settle in Rwanda whatever their cases is successful or not. UK will not take those who have successful cases. They aren’t going to ship back and forth (it will cost too much money). They want to make Rwanda like Turkey.
2- The successful cases will get financial help and maybe path to citizenship in Rwanda, those who don’t may get just get a little to survive.
3- Their gouvernement will get more $$$ so it will create more investments, more jobs, more skilled migrants...
4- UNHCR will do nothing, Europe already do the same with Turkey, Poland, Libya, Niger now Rwanda.
5- It failed this is why more and more europeans countries are taking strict measures. Danmark already had that idea, same with israel few years ago.
I agree, UK or any gouvernement should stop creating or waging war in another countries in the name of freedom or democracy.
And I think White british will prefer going to another white europeans countries who will likely accept them (in Europe, USA, Canada, Australia).
The africans british will likely be welcomed in africa or african majority countries.
The arabs/asians will likely be welcomed in arabs/asians countries.
Legal changes, people don't change their spots either, Psaki should move to Rwanda , maybe Lagos in Nigeria or something. She's a redhead liberal you'll just love her.
Welcome to Africa…
Africa is good, if you are running from war, welcome to peaceful Rwanda
The difference between White Christian and non Christian English is that they are intelligent enough to find asylum in a country with very similar culture, religion and ideology. Thus they will not impede newly adopted country's rapid progression.
Chinese immigrant can out do almost any others though. Look what happened when British colonialist left Singapore to the Chinese and South Indian immigrants.
Let the right 3rd world people in and China cyaan touch wi! Let the wrong ones in and you'll take the place in history as the next collapsed civilization.
Civilization of the Dragon seems to be next in line for the throne though.
FYI, I am not white nor Chinese. :)
Didmasela, Kagame could have declined but GLUTTON and CREED as prompted him to committed him to such actions.A SLAVE mentality. A LEOPARD can never change his spots!. These are the disguise puppet leaders. The love of money is the ROOT of all EVIL!
How is it illegal? I can’t show up at someone’s door and demand they let me in.
I can smell colonialism.
DOES THIS DEPORTATION NOT PUT THE PEOPLE OF RWANDA IN THE SAME POSITION THAT THE BRITISH ARE SCARED OF WITH THESE REFUGEES?
VOTE FOR REFORM UK 🇬🇧 STOP THIS INVASION
A Black man going to UK/Europe for protection/safety, SMH
World is one let's help the needy God will bless you
Yes
Safe country Rwanda!!! I know the problem Al-Jazeera asking are basing on recent writings come and VISIT Rwanda
That is what i have been saying all this time the British entered Africa illegally.
Listen Rwandan foreign minister Biruta who wants to go back will do it it is for their rights please!!!
Kenya should look at it as means to offset some of our national debts
ujinga
Uganda took in afghan migrants under a similar agreement and within a month two bombs went off 🤔 wacha tu…
Mlevi alikataa Kenya is his private property He should have sent them to those ranches in Laikipia owned by the British. Build resorts for them to shelter instead of Dadab and Kakuma.
or make the ruling family even more wealthier!
Kenyatta he's a smart man Rwanda president he is the dumbest leader in the Africa stupid
And of course no Rwandan or anyone else currently living in Rwanda is on the panel, that's where it's wrong.
May be Qatar can take few Syrian refugees
They gonna make the same thing they did with Palestine but with different excuse this time..
Wisdom
🇬🇧 My QUESTION is:What happens to those REFUGEES who are deemed NOT to Qualify by BRITISH Government? Where do they go from RWANDA?🤔🤔🤔
They are not shipping Ukrainians.
It is shameful for BoJo to say that sending migrants to Rwanda will be a deterrent, when Rwanda claims it is being generous to the migrants. I studied in England for two years and it was common to hear British people agitating for all Africans to be sent back to Africa. This British paranoid about Africans is not new and it is going to get worse overtime as the Conservative party stranglehold on political power persists.
This is a good ideas 💡💡💡💡, please bring them back to Africa, we need Africa to develop like Europe and America
Under pressure from? - easy response: 1) a distraction from being the only PM to be prosecuted by the law 2) a distraction from having partied when the Queen was alone with her grief at the loss of her spouse as were thousands of UK citizens. 3) running from the disgrace of lying to the UK public and parliament and not admitting it. 4) preventing Ukrainians from entering the UK as easily as in any other European country. This action is simple misdirection - look here bigits and xenophobes, we are doing something about a problem we caused ourselves!
Oh shut up, world's got more problems than a party
The man is pathetically shameless. He has dragged the UK in the mud with his blatant lies and deceitfulness.
let me just add, don't throw away Ruanda's generous gesture, it's very kind of them to invite Europeans, that were oppressors of Africans, i am a white South African lived through apartheid years, and love South Africa, if one sees how those migrants were treated all over in Europe in tents and captured, one can understand the frustration of Europeans, people pouring in like rain every day. It's a wonderful surprise to see Ruanda that suffered Genocide from Hutu against Tutsi ,because the French sided and gave the Tutsi more power, i hope i am correct? The only concern would be the Congo, if they break out in fights among themselves, will the asylum seekers be protected. The first African country to welcome asylum seekers, i feel so proud of Ruanda
Borris is a fool that's why.