I am an immigrant and I see this as a good move. Am I weird? 1. Rwanda gets money to invest in it's economy 2. People so desperate to have a safe life will work hard even in Rwanda and help it's economy 3. Financial refugees won't like the idea and try to go back home (many have already) 4. UK reduces crimes and will save money wasted on people coming and staying illegally
At least they should give it a chance, we here in Britain simply cannot keep taking people in like we are. If for whatever reason it does not work after a fair trial, they can rethink things.
It's not being overrun. It's a tory culture war propaganda exercise. Only 13 thousand asylum seekers, were granted asylum in Britain. As of March 2022. As a side note, 650 thousand babies are born annually. It's literally nothing a percentage of the whole population. 67 million people.
@Valkorion Welcome to the 21st century, where we have boarder’s and rules. By your logic we should start slavery back up again. Time to calm yourself with the false equivalencies.
It also has double the population density of the UK so our sob story about being a small overcrowded island doesn't wash. Rwanda is little bigger than Wales.
Seeking asylum is a human right. Especially when we were responsible for destroying Iraq, Afghanistan and Libya and effectively causing this refugee crisis in the first place.
@@j7ech402 Why do these people all come from war zones? Poland has recently built a wall to stop Iraqi refugees seeking asylum. Poland was the 4th largest military involved in destroying Iraq in 2003 now they can’t accept the consequences. Britain spent billions in illegal wars in Afghanistan, Libya, Syria and Iraq. Why doesn’t the West take responsibility for its own foreign policy mistakes?
@@tomstory8502 a refugee is someone fleeing due to threat of death or other substantial harm or persecution. The vast majority of these illegals are not. Furthermore, if some are, then they still have right to seek asylum here. In the meantime they are safe and will be looked after in Rwanda. They will also be offered the chance of a new life in Rwanda regardless of the success or not of thier asylum claim. If they are really refugees, they should not even be arguing about this.
AINT NOTHING WRONG WITH RWANDA THO?? Whats everyones problem?? The solution to the immigration problem has to start somewhere, for good or bad, this is a start.
its the most idiotic policy ever conceived. Firstly, immigration in the UK is NOT a problem. Its lower than the majority of other EU countries and benefit the UK economy. Secondly, it makes no sense to spend 1000's to transport them abroad, just set up an office in France. The French have said that's fine. Thirdly, 70% of all "immigrants" by the governments own figures are legitimate refugees not migrants. Finally, Rwanda has again by the governments own statements, got serious human right problems.
@@lateknight4754 We're full up ... we can't sustain mass uncontrolled immigration from the third world. It's to the detriment of our society and culture if we continue to do so.... If anything we need mass deportations
@@lateknight4754 it's cheaper to pay for there flights than what there getting now. I think all boats should be escorted back out to sea into French waters. We don't need more mouths to feed.
asylum seekers by definition are not illegal immigrants, because claiming asylum gives them a legally legitimate claim for seeking sanctuary in the recipient country. I don't know much about this scheme, but it seems to me that it's going to do nothing to stop the huge influx of economic migrants we've had in the last year. 4x what it was before Brexit or under Labour. The tories are lying to everybody, pretending to be a party that's 'tough' on immigration with this token against legitimate refugees, and meanwhile opening the door wide open to over a million people in the last year.
@@bethyngalw they let it happen because it’s slave labour in disguise. Genuine slave labour like in the old days. It was never abolished. Just re-named .👍🏼
Rwanda is a very small country who is fighting to expand its own borders, how is it possible for UK to send refugees to a country that has no space 🤔???
@@MrSleeplessnights Its because they had agreements in place with the Ukrainian government to allow a certain number of refugees, plus with alliances and agreements with Ukraine they are kind of obliged to help them out. If they have agreements in place with countries that have refugees coming to the UK please let me know so I have more information.
“If fleeing danger is illegal” If they had applied for refugee status or not skipped over many other safe countries then it doesn’t matter what they flee, they are illegal
@@michaelmorris2300 I think going on your point about Ukraine, the country had an agreement with Ukraine to allow some refuguees in and allow a certain number. They all came boarding flights, the problem is with refugeesuees is that the take 'unecessary and illegal trips' therefore they have a problem with it. I think what they want them to do is seek aylumn in France because its much easier for the UK.
@@ek7758 Distinguishing between boarding a plane or boarding a boat, is the kind of hair splitting that undermines your argument. The Ukrainians had other neighbouring countries they could go to, which a lot of them did. However some had family in the UK and were allowed to come to the here. The last time I heard, the UK already had too many refugees.
A fair question deserves a fair answer. So here is my two cents. Even if one doesn't care about breaking international law, disregarding basic human rights, giving people who run for their lives from war zones a fair chance and all that, it is not cost effective. Only a small amount of people will be sent off in half empty planes for a lot of taxpayer money. It would be far easier to talk with the French government and open an office in France where people can apply for asylum in the UK. The whole application process could then be done in France. Anyone who gets asylum can subsequently take the ferry to the UK, people who are rejected can stay in France or go elsewhere. If rejected people do try to cross the Channel, they could be legitimally arrested, because they went through the process. Denying people a chance to ask for asylum breaks a whole lot of international treaties.
One day is a yr worth that Rwanda going to take. Plus pay their keep over their, taxpayers again plus legal aid cost and 110 separate flights. Distraction folks
Me and my daughter have just spoke about this, If Black Lives Matter is so important and the white British class is so terrible, surely they’ll have a better life in Africa, those are the words of an 8 year old not mine
@@lucysadanscan7057 she said if they passed through 8 safe countries before they got to the UK then why are they moaning about being given the chance to live in another Safe country 😮 they all have an excuse as to why they want/need to live in the UK. Its all bulls&£t live in Rwanda or be sent back to your home country.... Your choice
Please give your 8 years old some British colonial history lessons as well. If this is her opinion at this age I don't think parenting is going so great.
Its controversial for one reason only , it would work, and stop the lefties groaning on about brexit , Let's be democratic about it , let's have a national vote , and they would be gone .
I think the Ruwanda plan is good for the following reasons; 1) It discourages illegal immigration. We need to keep in mind every illegal immigrant take up the chance of a legal immigrant or a honest asylum seeker. And it makes immigration unpopular among the citizens. 2) It send money to Africa, where money is desperately needed However, there should be exceptions, such as for LGBT people, since Ruwanda is not hospitable to them.
@@lawrencebolt3540 Okay.... then it needs to be fixed. But still it's a no secret that Africa is the poorest continent. There are lots of reasons for that, such as colonialism, etc. but the fact remains that Africa needs money more than any continent.
@@Earth098 again, Africans don't need money. Africans need western multinationals out of Africa. If the west left Africa, Africa would be rich. Africa doesn't need cash. Britain needs cash because Britain hasn't got enough natural resources to maintain itself.
What surprise is that East African community the country around Rwanda,?they have as yet to say anything, this will definitely affect the country around Rwanda security, economy and social. The should also demand support to increase security in and out their boarders
Sorry I am super anti immigration i don't believe uk should take any person in wshould consecrate on our own economy they need to stop ✋ urkiane as well Britain needs to sort homeless people in uk first then sort others
Wait wait wait. I thought the migrants would stay in Rwanda until their asylum application is processed and accepted by the UK? But what I'm understanding from this video is that even once they are accepted as refugee they have to stay in Rwanda? Can they actually go to the UK at some point?
just 8000?! It is presented as the major UK problem that needs a immediate solution... and it's for just 8000 in 6 months.... jesus, get your priorities straight....
why do all foreigners get flights accommodation healthcare and everything for free......this uk government is so descrimitive and racist to British people....we have to work and pay for these things
If Rwanda wants to be a problem solver for the migration problem as they claim.. Well,, Right on the continent where they're situated there are mocho immigrants.. Why don't they get in contact with the various countries on the continent,,There are those that got wars,, Those that got famine and the people are in desperate need of food and water.. Why don't Rwanda take them all in since she claims to be a problem solver.. And leave Britain solve it own problems. Just a couple dollars,, And Rwanda is hoping and skipping,, That's whats at the root of it all....MONEY... THE LOVE OF MONEY IS THE ROOT OF ALL EVIL...
all these do gooders what keep stopping immigrants going to rwanda and being sent back home should be held responsable for them and be made to look after them and support them while they stay here
It doesn't matter what country it is going to, Lefties will do everything in their power to block deportation of illegal immigrants. That's what Lefties do.
@@josephm5287Whatever the reality is, the Rawandan government have a contract with the British government. If Rawanda starts to mistreat the people that Britain sends there, the British government can take action and even revoke the contract. That means a valuable loss of money to Rawanda. I really don't think they are going to mistreat British deportees. And anyway, it is not a reason to not send people to Rawanda in case they might be abused. It needs to evidence based. And there is zero evidence at present that British deportees will be or have been abused by Rawandan authorities. If abuse occurs, then the situation changes and the contract with Rawanda should be reviewed and remedial action take to stop any abuse.
There’s an old adage here in America that states , “If it sounds to good to be true it probably is”: what about the indigenous people who are already living in Rwanda? ?🤨. How are they going to feel about foreigners coming to their land being set up to live better than they themselves? 🤔. QUESTION EVERYTHING: What Is The Truth (WIT)??? 🤔 GYHOOYA: OYE!!! 😕
They are going to feel a damned sight happier than the British taxpayers are at the moment, who don't get paid one penny for housing, educating and looking after the health of our uninvited guests. Ignore the placard wavers. They have never worked in their lives. They are just a big a drain as the migrants. If only we could send them too!
I am an immigrant and I see this as a good move. Am I weird?
1. Rwanda gets money to invest in it's economy
2. People so desperate to have a safe life will work hard even in Rwanda and help it's economy
3. Financial refugees won't like the idea and try to go back home (many have already)
4. UK reduces crimes and will save money wasted on people coming and staying illegally
So when are they offering this to British people? I bet a lot of us would jump at the chance I know I would.
Go try it for size?
It looks pretty nice. Sunny!
I was thinking this
Us to Spain was a shock I legit screamed “WTF???”
Ur welcome lmfao
Obviously people from Latin America whose first language is Spanish.
I would much rather be in a country that wants me instead of being in a country that doesn't want me !
At least they should give it a chance, we here in Britain simply cannot keep taking people in like we are. If for whatever reason it does not work after a fair trial, they can rethink things.
😂😂😂
It is possible not to want your country and culture overrun with foreign people and cultures, without hating foreign people and cultures.
Well said
Is possible to just want everything to stay the same and everyone stay in the place they were born with out being a fascist?
Long live the British Islamic Republic
It's not being overrun. It's a tory culture war propaganda exercise. Only 13 thousand asylum seekers, were granted asylum in Britain. As of March 2022. As a side note, 650 thousand babies are born annually. It's literally nothing a percentage of the whole population. 67 million people.
@Valkorion Welcome to the 21st century, where we have boarder’s and rules. By your logic we should start slavery back up again. Time to calm yourself with the false equivalencies.
Send them all back
Can I go? 🥺 Looks better than my flat at present.
😂 thats what homeless people in the US are prob thinking!
doesn't sound like a bad deal, Rwanda is growing fast and has a great climate.. Its looking for become the Singapore of Africa..
@Barry Diego London I live in Singapore..
Stop lying 🤥
No good idea comes from a politician, there is always some dark hidden agendas behind.
I have been to Rwanda, it's beautiful, probably one of the nicest in Africa
Any chance of a seat on the plane, to get out of this cesspit of a country?? 🤔
It also has double the population density of the UK so our sob story about being a small overcrowded island doesn't wash. Rwanda is little bigger than Wales.
With the heating costs in the UK getting to Rwanda before winter sounds great 👍
Long live the British Islamic Republic
Give me 100000 k and I bounce Happly to Rwanda
🤣
It's only "controversial" to Sky, BBC and assorted luvvies!
Seeking asylum is a human right.
Especially when we were responsible for destroying Iraq, Afghanistan and Libya and effectively causing this refugee crisis in the first place.
@@tomstory8502 economic migration and asylum seeking are 2 different things.
Long live the British Islamic Republic
@@j7ech402
Why do these people all come from war zones?
Poland has recently built a wall to stop Iraqi refugees seeking asylum. Poland was the 4th largest military involved in destroying Iraq in 2003 now they can’t accept the consequences.
Britain spent billions in illegal wars in Afghanistan, Libya, Syria and Iraq.
Why doesn’t the West take responsibility for its own foreign policy mistakes?
@@tomstory8502 a refugee is someone fleeing due to threat of death or other substantial harm or persecution. The vast majority of these illegals are not. Furthermore, if some are, then they still have right to seek asylum here. In the meantime they are safe and will be looked after in Rwanda. They will also be offered the chance of a new life in Rwanda regardless of the success or not of thier asylum claim. If they are really refugees, they should not even be arguing about this.
AINT NOTHING WRONG WITH RWANDA THO?? Whats everyones problem?? The solution to the immigration problem has to start somewhere, for good or bad, this is a start.
Or France or Spain or Italy or or
its the most idiotic policy ever conceived. Firstly, immigration in the UK is NOT a problem. Its lower than the majority of other EU countries and benefit the UK economy. Secondly, it makes no sense to spend 1000's to transport them abroad, just set up an office in France. The French have said that's fine. Thirdly, 70% of all "immigrants" by the governments own figures are legitimate refugees not migrants. Finally, Rwanda has again by the governments own statements, got serious human right problems.
@@lateknight4754 We're full up ... we can't sustain mass uncontrolled immigration from the third world. It's to the detriment of our society and culture if we continue to do so.... If anything we need mass deportations
@@lateknight4754 it's cheaper to pay for there flights than what there getting now. I think all boats should be escorted back out to sea into French waters. We don't need more mouths to feed.
@@lateknight4754
No to your whole comment. Dear god..
A truly brilliant idea ! Send them all to Rwanda ! 🎉🎉🎉
Exactly. Disincentives illegal boarder crossings.
It's a straight swop , we are giving some and getting some and we pay 120 million extra tax
Sounds like people trafficking to me.
Why should it be controversial?
They are illegal immigrants.
asylum seekers by definition are not illegal immigrants, because claiming asylum gives them a legally legitimate claim for seeking sanctuary in the recipient country. I don't know much about this scheme, but it seems to me that it's going to do nothing to stop the huge influx of economic migrants we've had in the last year. 4x what it was before Brexit or under Labour. The tories are lying to everybody, pretending to be a party that's 'tough' on immigration with this token against legitimate refugees, and meanwhile opening the door wide open to over a million people in the last year.
@@bethyngalw they let it happen because it’s slave labour in disguise.
Genuine slave labour like in the old days.
It was never abolished.
Just re-named .👍🏼
Long live the British Islamic Republic
@@Laughing_Lord ... in your dreams Abdul
It's not controversial, not for the majority of ordinary native British people who support it.
Rwanda is a very small country who is fighting to expand its own borders, how is it possible for UK to send refugees to a country that has no space 🤔???
What is the definition of a refugee?
It isn’t controversial. It is only described as such by the left wing media, I.e. the bbc and Sky news.
So the Ukrainian refugees are ok to stay in your house though right?
@@MrSleeplessnights Its because they had agreements in place with the Ukrainian government to allow a certain number of refugees, plus with alliances and agreements with Ukraine they are kind of obliged to help them out. If they have agreements in place with countries that have refugees coming to the UK please let me know so I have more information.
“If fleeing danger is illegal”
If they had applied for refugee status or not skipped over many other safe countries then it doesn’t matter what they flee, they are illegal
A gift shop??
To send presents back to Priti Patel & Bojo for the one way ticket to the unknown
why not have a go at the countries' that generate the refugees? they are the ones in the wrong
This is a great scheme but I think the government needs to be a bit more harsher.
Does this include people from Ukraine?
@@michaelmorris2300 I think going on your point about Ukraine, the country had an agreement with Ukraine to allow some refuguees in and allow a certain number. They all came boarding flights, the problem is with refugeesuees is that the take 'unecessary and illegal trips' therefore they have a problem with it. I think what they want them to do is seek aylumn in France because its much easier for the UK.
@@ek7758 Distinguishing between boarding a plane or boarding a boat, is the kind of hair splitting that undermines your argument. The Ukrainians had other neighbouring countries they could go to, which a lot of them did. However some had family in the UK and were allowed to come to the here. The last time I heard, the UK already had too many refugees.
still dont really know why people oppose it. Any fair observations?
Make it make sense please
A fair question deserves a fair answer. So here is my two cents. Even if one doesn't care about breaking international law, disregarding basic human rights, giving people who run for their lives from war zones a fair chance and all that, it is not cost effective. Only a small amount of people will be sent off in half empty planes for a lot of taxpayer money. It would be far easier to talk with the French government and open an office in France where people can apply for asylum in the UK. The whole application process could then be done in France. Anyone who gets asylum can subsequently take the ferry to the UK, people who are rejected can stay in France or go elsewhere. If rejected people do try to cross the Channel, they could be legitimally arrested, because they went through the process. Denying people a chance to ask for asylum breaks a whole lot of international treaties.
How about it's a tiny country not much bigger than Wales, with double the population density of the UK?
A damn good idea if the Government ever had the balls to enforce and implement it. They probably won't.
2 computer centres and a gift shop? It’s 2 computers and a basket of cigs. This commentator is as daft as this policy
why not have a go at the countries' that generate the refugees? they are the daft ones
Disgusting and appalling. They have a history of human rights violations. This goes against the European human rights laws.
One day is a yr worth that Rwanda going to take. Plus pay their keep over their, taxpayers again plus legal aid cost and 110 separate flights. Distraction folks
Love and peace from Sherpa 😇💖
Why is no one talking about the fact that Rwanda as part of the deal is going to send people to us.
No borders no nations I stand with Ukraine.
Great idea ,now we just need to catch a load that have disappeared into these sweatshops not paying taxes and owners making a fortune
Me and my daughter have just spoke about this, If Black Lives Matter is so important and the white British class is so terrible, surely they’ll have a better life in Africa, those are the words of an 8 year old not mine
And what does the 8 year old think should happen to the Ukrainian refugees ?
@@lucysadanscan7057 her honest opinion I just asked her, “the uk shouldn’t get involved in other countries business”
@@lucysadanscan7057 she said if they passed through 8 safe countries before they got to the UK then why are they moaning about being given the chance to live in another Safe country 😮 they all have an excuse as to why they want/need to live in the UK. Its all bulls&£t live in Rwanda or be sent back to your home country.... Your choice
Please give your 8 years old some British colonial history lessons as well. If this is her opinion at this age I don't think parenting is going so great.
Fully agree no person is going to run to their oppressor. They want everything for free
120million pound is a down payment-we will be fleeced-we have already suffered enough!!
Why did he describe it as a “gift shop”? It’s clearly just a “shop”.
Beggars can’t be choosers
It's only controversial with out of touch people and the media. Most people actually support it, I'm not even a Tory and support it.
HE HAVE ENOUGH IMMIGRANTS HERE - IF WE SENT 100 PER DAY TO RWANDA IT WOULD TAKE AGES TO SEE THE BACK END OF THEM .
Its controversial for one reason only , it would work, and stop the lefties groaning on about brexit ,
Let's be democratic about it , let's have a national vote , and they would be gone .
Are lefties people who got their life in order and don't mind sharing with others because they don't need to fight for crumbs? I'm confused.
@@erikschmidt476 no there the ones shouting let them stay , oh but not in my village
Where’s Priti ? She’s awfully quite.
Now they will think 2 before going to uk illegal
I want to go to rwanda that looks good😮😮😂
ECONOMIC MIGRANTS NOT ASYLUM SEEKERS
Wow, I actually didn't know they would end up moving to Rwanda permanently!
Godbless earth
I think the Ruwanda plan is good for the following reasons;
1) It discourages illegal immigration. We need to keep in mind every illegal immigrant take up the chance of a legal immigrant or a honest asylum seeker. And it makes immigration unpopular among the citizens.
2) It send money to Africa, where money is desperately needed
However, there should be exceptions, such as for LGBT people, since Ruwanda is not hospitable to them.
Money isn't needed in Africa.
400 billion dollars is stolen from Africa every year and makes its way through European financial systems.
@@lawrencebolt3540 Okay.... then it needs to be fixed. But still it's a no secret that Africa is the poorest continent. There are lots of reasons for that, such as colonialism, etc. but the fact remains that Africa needs money more than any continent.
@@Earth098 again, Africans don't need money. Africans need western multinationals out of Africa.
If the west left Africa, Africa would be rich.
Africa doesn't need cash. Britain needs cash because Britain hasn't got enough natural resources to maintain itself.
Lgbt will get a re education it's a win win situation
What's to stop anyone from claiming to be lgbt if it stops them from being deported there?
Botany Bay …………..Rwanda ………………. History repeats itself !
🏴☠️All aboard me Harties 🏴☠️
1:16 OMG why are they complaining for?... That's luxury... Many native British are lucky if they even get a roof over their head....
Stop the lawyers interfering.
120 million every year that is paying in that country
What surprise is that East African community the country around Rwanda,?they have as yet to say anything, this will definitely affect the country around Rwanda security, economy and social. The should also demand support to increase security in and out their boarders
Good
Just get on with it. The UK is full
🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉خلاص جيد
😢
Sorry I am super anti immigration i don't believe uk should take any person in wshould consecrate on our own economy they need to stop ✋ urkiane as well Britain needs to sort homeless people in uk first then sort others
export our gold and Diamonds, along with the people
This has nothing to do with immigration. We understand what UK truly wants in that particular region of Africa. We’re not blind
What do they want?
What is it that they want? Tell us.
Yeah,Amazon..........etc
W must pay Rwanda for life!
Wait wait wait. I thought the migrants would stay in Rwanda until their asylum application is processed and accepted by the UK? But what I'm understanding from this video is that even once they are accepted as refugee they have to stay in Rwanda? Can they actually go to the UK at some point?
👍👍👍👍
The agreement states that the UK must take refugees from Rawanda.
Only 300 a year will be sent there. Not bad for 120 million.
1:15 that look good now i want to go
Horrible world!
why not have a go at the countries' that generate the refugees in the first place? they are the ones in the wrong
book your seats now from Ryan Air.😂
Send Priti Patel relatives to Rwanda...
Priti Patel is checking into her own Rwanda concentration camp next week and there's no return flight for her¬
why not have a go at the countries' that generate the refugees in the first place? they are the ones in the wrong
The protesters can house them + feed them +any medical care they can pay for that too
I'm a liberal but I can support this.
just 8000?! It is presented as the major UK problem that needs a immediate solution... and it's for just 8000 in 6 months.... jesus, get your priorities straight....
About time
Rwanda is nice af…
8000! i wonder what uk ppl would say to the numbers we take in in germany
What was Priti Patel doing in Israel? Why did she hide her trip. Was she buying the Pegasus programme for the UK government?
They like cigarettes, yes 🚬 😂
It’s not controversial with the actual English population
Can Brits apply ?? I'm in
We don’t need it! Pick them up in the channel and immediately return them to France! Boris just needs to grow a pair!!
They took 120 millions and they built rooms for a fiver lol
Do all these snowflakes have a solid proposal as to how we pay for all these refugees and not have our public services overrun to breaking point??
Sigaretta befor food that’s not good no no no 👎
Bravo!
😮
Where's all the Comments?
Govt should send fail asylum seeker to states why not since their are already millions and counting 😂😂😂❤
20,000 arrive this year, 4 on the plane costing over a million? Tell me this isn't a British operation
Hello
why do all foreigners get flights accommodation healthcare and everything for free......this uk government is so descrimitive and racist to British people....we have to work and pay for these things
despicable
If Rwanda wants to be a problem solver for the migration problem as they claim..
Well,, Right on the continent where they're situated there are mocho immigrants..
Why don't they get in contact with the various countries on the continent,,There are those that got wars,, Those that got famine and the people are in desperate need of food and water..
Why don't Rwanda take them all in since she claims to be a problem solver..
And leave Britain solve it own problems.
Just a couple dollars,, And Rwanda is hoping and skipping,, That's whats at the root of it all....MONEY...
THE LOVE OF MONEY IS THE ROOT OF ALL EVIL...
Scheme or Scam?
Isn't strange how the protesters haven't been arrested for showing racism against Rwanda.
After this no one can say anything about Hungary and migration, right?
Evil that's what it is
wicked woman she is
why not have a go at the countries' that generate the refugees in the first place? they are the ones in the wrong
all these do gooders what keep stopping immigrants going to rwanda and being sent back home should be held responsable for them and be made to look after them and support them while they stay here
This is criminal
So many people hating the idea, what’s wrong with Rwanda? It’s a beautiful country, and has a history of being great for Libyan refugees
It doesn't matter what country it is going to, Lefties will do everything in their power to block deportation of illegal immigrants. That's what Lefties do.
@@josephm5287Whatever the reality is, the Rawandan government have a contract with the British government. If Rawanda starts to mistreat the people that Britain sends there, the British government can take action and even revoke the contract. That means a valuable loss of money to Rawanda. I really don't think they are going to mistreat British deportees.
And anyway, it is not a reason to not send people to Rawanda in case they might be abused. It needs to evidence based. And there is zero evidence at present that British deportees will be or have been abused by Rawandan authorities.
If abuse occurs, then the situation changes and the contract with Rawanda should be reviewed and remedial action take to stop any abuse.
There’s an old adage here in America that states , “If it sounds to good to be true it probably is”: what about the indigenous people who are already living in Rwanda? ?🤨. How are they going to feel about foreigners coming to their land being set up to live better than they themselves? 🤔. QUESTION EVERYTHING: What Is The Truth (WIT)??? 🤔 GYHOOYA: OYE!!! 😕
They are going to feel a damned sight happier than the British taxpayers are at the moment, who don't get paid one penny for housing, educating and looking after the health of our uninvited guests. Ignore the placard wavers. They have never worked in their lives. They are just a big a drain as the migrants. If only we could send them too!
400 arrived today
Government MIGHT deport a couple of illegals
When will this madness stop
How's rim tin flying the landees to Rw going to stop them Channel drowning ¿?
Long live the British Islamic Republic
Bon voyage 👋👋👋
Nobody is ever going to arrive in a concentration camp in Rwanda!
Rwanda is the mostt expensive country on earth! Britain will never pay off her debt to Rwanda!
Africa is a bottomless pit!
why not have a go at the countries' that generate the refugees in the first place? they are the ones in the wrong
These only one building for the refugees