That Mavs trade is hilarious. Why would you trade away that many pieces, pieces that were big into getting you to the Finals, for a guy that drops off in the playoffs?
This would be a worst trade for the knicks because how doe this trade improve them? Randle is more of a #2 than bridges so the Knicks would take a step back with this trade.
Garland had a massive injury with a broken jaw last year and lost hella weight due to having to change his diet. I think the cavs are gonna wait till the deadline before dealing him
I don't get how anyone would think the Randle trade would be a good idea for Mavs. I'm sure he could do well with the Mavs, but trading away Gafford and PJ is just crazy.
@@Icedxylophone pj is trash compared to Randle. Him playing with kyrie and Luka would open up so much more for him. Also it would help them two a lot more than pj and gafford combined lol
@@adamdrach3894 I'd have a much easier time with it if it was PJ + Powell/Maxi, but it isn't the Mavs offense is to a large degree run through Luka -> Gafford/DLive, and so I disagree. Looking forward to seeing what their last moves will be.
Because they are casuals. It doesnt take much for these casuals to make videos and try to make themselves look like a GM. They just look at stats and highlights instead of actually watching full games.
As a Magic fan, i hate that Garland trade. Suggs is a really good fit and hes so young, Suggs is a top tier perimeter defender and defense is our calling card
as a jazz fan i already know ainge would never do that trade, we already have 2 young point guards and 2 older ones, we don’t need more guards, so im also saying no
New York isn’t trading Randle until around the deadline. They don’t have the capital to get an upgrade for a guy like KAT or Markkanen and they don’t need to trade Randle for roll players or a guy like BI. At his best, Randle is a very solid #2. Not to mention, with Randle, the Knicks starting 5 is massive: Brunson, Bridges, OG, Randle and Mitchell Robinson.
Knicks gotta see what they have with a healthy squad before big moves are considered definitely. That sample run we had with Brunson, OG, Randle was something else.
@@ifheavenwashuman As a Cavs fan, I hope he isn’t, but the truth of the matter is regardless of his status on the team, the Knicks are the best team in the East.
Don’t think there’s an all-star in the NBA nearly as disrespected as Randle. Last season, prior to injury, dude was playing absolutely elite ball on an All-NBA level and the Knicks were wrecking the East, and yet the dude is treated like a scrub.
@@RW0Acri his first playoffs he had to completely carry a trash team. His second he played on a busted ankle that required surgery at the end of the season, so cut him some slack. Not nearly a large enough sample size to say that.
@@RW0AcriRandle had Elfrid Payton and a 331 yr old Derrick Eose on one of those playoffs series. Imagine Elfrid Payton as the PG for Gafford and PJ Washington. That trio wouldn’t win 20 games let alone carry a team to the playoffs.
Agreed... Dude is a 3 time Allstar and 2 time All NBA player (probably 3 time without injuries), who averages 23/10/5 for the last 4 years on solid efficiency. And he is the 50th highest payed player in the league. So on a good contract on top of the on court production... and people talk about him as if he is a scrub who shouldnt even be a starter!
@@Smido83 Not solid efficiency. Below average efficiency. Below average defense. High turnovers. Plus, he's thrown multiple temper tantrums and pouts when he doesn't get his numbers. He's a high volume high minute player. He needs a Jokic level usage rate to get that 23/10/5. He was about 15th in the league in usage rate and about 50th in the league in PER. The Knicks were basically just as good without him. He's not a perimeter defender. He doesn't protect the rim. He doesn't space the floor. He's not a dominant inside scorer. He's a stat padder. He's the reason advanced metrics exist. The best Knicks season since Randl'es arrival to NYC came with Randle spending the second half of the season in street clothes. Nobody is going to want Randle if the Knicks don't. Randle SHOULD have more value to the Knicks than any other team in the league. There's a reason Randle is seen as such a good "Power forward." Nobody plays like him. The PF position is an old school designation. Bully ball forwards have won how many titles? What do Durant, Wiggins, Harrison Barnes, Aaron Gordon, MPJ, Jaylen Brown, and Tatum have in common? They are championship forwards. None of them are "bully ball" players.
Horrible take. Neither of those guys would even start in NY. Maybe Gafford would start when Robinson is injured but PJ may not get burn at all. He might get 5-10 min behind OG, Bridges, and Hart.
Haven't even finished the video and that first Markkanen trade is hilarious. Hawks are retooling first off, and most importantly, they currently have a log jam at the wing spot. They are literally one of the only teams who wouldn't be looking to trade for Markkanen given how valuable the wing position is in the league rn.
Randle is a better fit in New York than Dallas. I would not trade 25/10/5 for two role players and a set of second rounders. Dude is all nba twice for a reason.
No way people think Randle trade a good trade just cause he from Dallas lol if randle get traded the best place for him is Minnesota, he fit the team persona
Why though? Is it really the case that only diehard Knicks fans see Randle's true value...or MAYBE there are legit reasons Randle isn't seen as being as valuable as his basic stats suggest he is???
@@Michael_Page how tf is being a all nba player twice,playing through a ankle injury and leading the Knicks to be competitive not legit reasons? I swear ya morons don’t be knowing shit about hooping. Stick to baseball
As a mavs fan we do not want to do that trade for Randle Those pieces are too valuable to the roster construction and Randle doesn’t do the things we’d be losing Most we can give up is Kleber exum and one of the two way players and 3 second round picks
Cleveland is going to roll into the season with their “big four.” They’ll likely make moves at or around the deadline. As a Cavs fan, I would love to see us move Strus and Niang for Wiggins and a protected 1st.
We've definitely gotta get rid of Niang but I think trading Allen for Brandon Ingram straight up is a good idea. Either Garland or Mitchell can become off ball players there's no resolve for the issue of Allen & Mobley being less effective playing at the same time. We need a win now player at the 3 that can generate his own offense
I hate that everyone in the comments is hating on the Randle trade from the mavs perspective while not also recognizing it’s bad from the Knicks perspective. We trade an all nba player for a pj Washington who also played worse in the playoffs/ finals and Daniel gafford who was largely unplayable against the celtics
In the past I would have dreamed having Randle come home to Dallas, but hell to the no for this deal!!! I don’t want to lose the Lively/Gafford center dynamic, I don’t want to lose the toughness of PJ Washington and I don’t want to lose the scoring off the bench from Jaden Hardy. Hardy’s first 2 years in Dallas look more promising than Jalen Brunson’s first 2 years were in Dallas from 2018-2020.
If anything, Lauri to Mavs would make a better deal. I mean they will be top heavy a little bit, but the play style of Lauri fits so well with Luka and Kyrie. He's not a DPOY candidate but he's a better defender than Randle. And besides Randle's play style is a little incompatible with the roster that the Mavs have esp during defensive possessions. Lastly, Randle is too streaky for what the Mavs need.
Randle lacks defensive skills and is too injury-prone. If they're willing to take Kleber and Powell along with a couple of second-round picks, then go for it. Otherwise, we should pass on this opportunity. We need reliable players who can contribute consistently on both ends of the floor, and Randle just doesn't fit that profile.
@@liferealgood Old Randle is dead, that's what you don't seem to understand. He's half was he's with all those injuries. Not to mention PJ went to the finals and performed decently (was a key player in the OKC series), unlike playoff choker Randle. The knicks will never get a trade like there for him, ever
That would be a steal for the Knicks, they get a back up big which is a absolute need for the Knicks, and the Mavericks would have to rely on Dwight Powell. If they don't want PJ they can trade him with along the Maverick picks.
@@liferealgoodYes I would, The Knicks need a backup center, and with the assets of PJ, Hardy, and draft picks they could get another depth piece, the Mavericks would have to rely on Dwight Powell as their back up center which would be horrible, the Mavericks don't need a below average defender, and someone who wants the ball.
@@beef2503”they could get another depth” bro they don’t need anymore depth. They nine rotation deep right now. A backup center is a terrible trade off. On face value that’s a terrible trade for both teams. Knicks better with Randle than a backup center who before Dallas was best known for getting yammer on consistently.
@@liferealgood Point is, the Knicks need a back up center and Gafford can be that, Mitchell Robinson isn't going to be healthy all year, the Mavericks get a below average defender, a player who needs the ball and the Knicks get what they want, a backup center. You could never have too much depth you can always improve your team. Also every center gets posterized what is that logic?
@@beef2503 bruh a backup center at the COST of losing an all nba player. A backup center. In what world is losing 25/10/5 a game to gain a backup center make any sense? A non-shooting backup center at that. Literally can’t even stretch the floor.
The randle trade is super unrealistic. Your giving up a 24/9/5 guy for worse players. This trade makes no sense at all. Knicks should keep randle by all means. He’s their second option in scoring and if we traded randle in this case it would be bad since it would only be Brunson mainly scoring. This trade makes no sense for the Knicks, not even a first round pick too. A definite lose for the Knicks. Its also a weird fir for the mavs since randle needs the ball more and your sharing the ball with luka and Kyrie? It won’t work well.
The Cleveland- Orlando trade is one of the few fake trades that make sense Suggs + Mobley is unfair and it paves the way for an Allen-Ingram swap. Suggs makes way sense next to Mitchell than Garland and Carter makes way sense next to Mobley than Allen. The Orlando side... Well it certainly changes their identity. Garland - Banchero actions could be pretty nasty though and the theoretical on ball/off ball version of Garland makes sense with Paolo/Franz and they have the size to protect him
@@Phoenix-pm2qr How? Garland - Mitchell doesn't work on defense. Allen - Mobley doesn't work offense. Cleveland has been trying to find bench offense for years. This trade solves all three issues at once. And if you follow that up by trading Allen, Tyson and LeVert for Ingram you replace whatever offense you lost from trading Garland. Now you're better on offense with Carter's spacing and passing replacing Allen and bumping Mobley closer to the basket. And better on defense with Suggs -- a guy who is basically Gen Z Jrue Holiday -- replacing your worst defender
You don't watch Knicks games. Leave that to Knicks content creators. Julius Randle is an excellent passer with a high IQ. Last season he moved the ball well and made his shots off of movement instead of spit up post play.
F that. Cavs should slam the phone and laugh. He need wings and guys who can shoot Why give away one if the few guys who can score for a bunch of bums who cannot shoot? Cavs already have defensive studs in Mobley, Wade, Okoko, and Allen.
i like non of this trades... the magic should keep their young core togerher, the cavs maybe should desl DG... the hawks need a real idea first, the jazz too. the mavs and knicks look great, why should they trade. and the pacersdeal would not provide improvement, turner is too important.
That Mavs trade is hilarious. Why would you trade away that many pieces, pieces that were big into getting you to the Finals, for a guy that drops off in the playoffs?
hoops channels during off season are absolute trash. anything for clicks
@@chizdip8192 bro I swear people like you don’t even understand basketball
It’s also not ideal for the Knicks, this because the Knicks already have depth of the bench
That Atlanta and Utah trade would never happen in a million years
Nico would NEVER trade away PJ and Gafford after their impact last season. I would be PISSED!
Bringing in Randle in Dallas would be an awful fit we don’t need more scoring at this point
Especially from a guy who is useless without the ball
And don’t need another non defender
Would be a horrible mistake. He’d be the 4th option.
@@MrJman967 say you didnt watch the knicks in january after the og anonuby trade without saying it.
This would be a worst trade for the knicks because how doe this trade improve them? Randle is more of a #2 than bridges so the Knicks would take a step back with this trade.
What a great take on a horrible trade scenario for the mavericks.
Garland had a massive injury with a broken jaw last year and lost hella weight due to having to change his diet. I think the cavs are gonna wait till the deadline before dealing him
@@loudimes5502 most definitely 👍🏿
I don't get how anyone would think the Randle trade would be a good idea for Mavs. I'm sure he could do well with the Mavs, but trading away Gafford and PJ is just crazy.
@@Icedxylophone pj is trash compared to Randle. Him playing with kyrie and Luka would open up so much more for him. Also it would help them two a lot more than pj and gafford combined lol
@@adamdrach3894 I'd have a much easier time with it if it was PJ + Powell/Maxi, but it isn't the Mavs offense is to a large degree run through Luka -> Gafford/DLive, and so I disagree. Looking forward to seeing what their last moves will be.
Because they are casuals. It doesnt take much for these casuals to make videos and try to make themselves look like a GM. They just look at stats and highlights instead of actually watching full games.
Randle trade is foolish to suggest, no point in doing it for mavs to throw away pieces for an inconsistent creator.
Bro wtf are you talking about Randle avg 24 and 10 on 47% shooting lol talk about the playoffs but inconsistent he is not
@@cookingwitchefzayy8830 bro these morons don’t know shit about basketball
U rii it’s foolish for the Knicks why would we trade Randle for them
As a Magic fan, i hate that Garland trade. Suggs is a really good fit and hes so young, Suggs is a top tier perimeter defender and defense is our calling card
None of these trades work in my opinion
That's a horrible trade for the Mavs
as a jazz fan i already know ainge would never do that trade, we already have 2 young point guards and 2 older ones, we don’t need more guards, so im also saying no
New York isn’t trading Randle until around the deadline. They don’t have the capital to get an upgrade for a guy like KAT or Markkanen and they don’t need to trade Randle for roll players or a guy like BI. At his best, Randle is a very solid #2. Not to mention, with Randle, the Knicks starting 5 is massive: Brunson, Bridges, OG, Randle and Mitchell Robinson.
I'm still unsure he's a real number two option on an elite team.
Hart DiVincenzo Kolek on the bench. Scary
Knicks gotta see what they have with a healthy squad before big moves are considered definitely. That sample run we had with Brunson, OG, Randle was something else.
@@ifheavenwashumanhow? Man’s had everyone else shooting better just by his presence
@@ifheavenwashuman As a Cavs fan, I hope he isn’t, but the truth of the matter is regardless of his status on the team, the Knicks are the best team in the East.
MFFL we don't want Randle
Anyone would be lucky to have him
@ColetivoLunar *unlucky
You’re a moorrrrrron
Yeah ight lmao
@@DimitriKoeif you don’t know ball
Wouldn’t even trade gafford alone for randle
Don’t think there’s an all-star in the NBA nearly as disrespected as Randle. Last season, prior to injury, dude was playing absolutely elite ball on an All-NBA level and the Knicks were wrecking the East, and yet the dude is treated like a scrub.
Have you seen him in every playoffs series he ever plays? I think it’s justified to say that he’s a regular season shiner, and not a playoffs person.
@@RW0Acri his first playoffs he had to completely carry a trash team. His second he played on a busted ankle that required surgery at the end of the season, so cut him some slack. Not nearly a large enough sample size to say that.
@@RW0AcriRandle had Elfrid Payton and a 331 yr old Derrick Eose on one of those playoffs series. Imagine Elfrid Payton as the PG for Gafford and PJ Washington. That trio wouldn’t win 20 games let alone carry a team to the playoffs.
Agreed... Dude is a 3 time Allstar and 2 time All NBA player (probably 3 time without injuries), who averages 23/10/5 for the last 4 years on solid efficiency. And he is the 50th highest payed player in the league. So on a good contract on top of the on court production... and people talk about him as if he is a scrub who shouldnt even be a starter!
@@Smido83 Not solid efficiency. Below average efficiency. Below average defense. High turnovers. Plus, he's thrown multiple temper tantrums and pouts when he doesn't get his numbers. He's a high volume high minute player. He needs a Jokic level usage rate to get that 23/10/5. He was about 15th in the league in usage rate and about 50th in the league in PER. The Knicks were basically just as good without him. He's not a perimeter defender. He doesn't protect the rim. He doesn't space the floor. He's not a dominant inside scorer. He's a stat padder. He's the reason advanced metrics exist.
The best Knicks season since Randl'es arrival to NYC came with Randle spending the second half of the season in street clothes. Nobody is going to want Randle if the Knicks don't. Randle SHOULD have more value to the Knicks than any other team in the league.
There's a reason Randle is seen as such a good "Power forward." Nobody plays like him. The PF position is an old school designation. Bully ball forwards have won how many titles? What do Durant, Wiggins, Harrison Barnes, Aaron Gordon, MPJ, Jaylen Brown, and Tatum have in common? They are championship forwards. None of them are "bully ball" players.
That Knicks and Mavs trade will be terrible on the Mavs to do. And the Knicks would be a completely upgraded team, more than they already are 😂
Horrible take. Neither of those guys would even start in NY. Maybe Gafford would start when Robinson is injured but PJ may not get burn at all. He might get 5-10 min behind OG, Bridges, and Hart.
@@jorgefigueroa2245 bro ya kids are dumb asf
The Magic are not trading Suggs
If Knicks took super dwight and lay-up line maxi misalot then added 2 first round picks might think about it but probably still say no.
I'd rather have Randall for 30 million then Paul George for 55 million
Turner for Ingram? Hell no! are they fcking drunk? He is not even worth like 10% of Turner in terms of the contribution to the team.
Turner so underrated
All of these trades are horrible for at least one team except the Markkanen one...
Terrible trade for the Knicks. BR really have some of the most atrocious hypothetical trades around
Randle on the Mavs would be awful. Luka and Kai handle the ball way too much already
None of these make sense per usual🕊
Haven't even finished the video and that first Markkanen trade is hilarious. Hawks are retooling first off, and most importantly, they currently have a log jam at the wing spot. They are literally one of the only teams who wouldn't be looking to trade for Markkanen given how valuable the wing position is in the league rn.
Randle is a better fit in New York than Dallas. I would not trade 25/10/5 for two role players and a set of second rounders. Dude is all nba twice for a reason.
We trade Garland and get nothing for the wing position what you shit trade🎯
No way people think Randle trade a good trade just cause he from Dallas lol if randle get traded the best place for him is Minnesota, he fit the team persona
@@bigbenji__ homie you make zero fucking sense
@@adamdrach3894 then why you commented goofy
everyone sleeping on randle
Why though? Is it really the case that only diehard Knicks fans see Randle's true value...or MAYBE there are legit reasons Randle isn't seen as being as valuable as his basic stats suggest he is???
@@Michael_Page how tf is being a all nba player twice,playing through a ankle injury and leading the Knicks to be competitive not legit reasons? I swear ya morons don’t be knowing shit about hooping. Stick to baseball
Bruh BR literally posted these just to post these 😂 all of these are trash
Just found this Channel great content
Bot
That Mavs/Knicks trade is not happening
As a mavs fan we do not want to do that trade for Randle
Those pieces are too valuable to the roster construction and Randle doesn’t do the things we’d be losing
Most we can give up is Kleber exum and one of the two way players and 3 second round picks
You cant mention lauri without thr clip of him dunking on vooch 🤣🤣🤣
Cleveland is going to roll into the season with their “big four.” They’ll likely make moves at or around the deadline. As a Cavs fan, I would love to see us move Strus and Niang for Wiggins and a protected 1st.
We've definitely gotta get rid of Niang but I think trading Allen for Brandon Ingram straight up is a good idea. Either Garland or Mitchell can become off ball players there's no resolve for the issue of Allen & Mobley being less effective playing at the same time. We need a win now player at the 3 that can generate his own offense
Agreed, If I’m the cavs I make this trade. Works for the pels too because they need a starting centre.
I hate that everyone in the comments is hating on the Randle trade from the mavs perspective while not also recognizing it’s bad from the Knicks perspective. We trade an all nba player for a pj Washington who also played worse in the playoffs/ finals and Daniel gafford who was largely unplayable against the celtics
We dint want give gaff or pj...
Say it louder for the ones in the back! Who the heck would trade an All NBA PF for two guys who won’t start.
@@liferealgood keep your injured All-Star off bench
@@sportgame9316 buddy luka ain’t gonna win that team ya put together. Lmao he needs a player like Randle to make things easier for him
All these trades are horrible, all of them. Why would the Knicks trade Randle for some scrubs and 2 seconds?
You clearly do not watch any cavs games if you think that is a good trade
It's a slow summer but still need them views I guess. Just do Caitlin and Bromny videos
Whoever conceived of that Mavs trade was smoking crack
In the past I would have dreamed having Randle come home to Dallas, but hell to the no for this deal!!!
I don’t want to lose the Lively/Gafford center dynamic, I don’t want to lose the toughness of PJ Washington and I don’t want to lose the scoring off the bench from Jaden Hardy. Hardy’s first 2 years in Dallas look more promising than Jalen Brunson’s first 2 years were in Dallas from 2018-2020.
@@SinaSoh what toughness? Pj turned bitch against Boston. Man’s came through in one series for ya lol. I swear ya people don’t know shit about hooping
@@SinaSoh there’s no way your dumbass just compared jb and a role player he hasn’t even sniffed 12 ppg lmao
Yo does anyone else find his vids quiet. I feel like i shouldn't have to turn my tv to 20 to hear it.
So you find stupid articles from stupid people and give your opinion on that. What a great existence. You really bring a lot to the NBA community.
If anything, Lauri to Mavs would make a better deal. I mean they will be top heavy a little bit, but the play style of Lauri fits so well with Luka and Kyrie. He's not a DPOY candidate but he's a better defender than Randle. And besides Randle's play style is a little incompatible with the roster that the Mavs have esp during defensive possessions. Lastly, Randle is too streaky for what the Mavs need.
I think the Magic can be the OKC of the east ,
What if Magic traded Cole Anthony, J Howell or Gary Harris (futire 2nd rd pick swap) for Ant Simmons
If Indy does this they'll need to try for j. Allen from cavs
Brandon Ingram to the Bucks makes sense. Middleton is always hurt. They need a younger replacement that is more reliable
Randle lacks defensive skills and is too injury-prone. If they're willing to take Kleber and Powell along with a couple of second-round picks, then go for it. Otherwise, we should pass on this opportunity. We need reliable players who can contribute consistently on both ends of the floor, and Randle just doesn't fit that profile.
Miles turner underrated
Pj and Gaffy out ? No freaking way !
You're insane to think Randle is worth that much at this point. At best it's PJ only and a pick for Randle, come on bro 😂
try listening to the video, it's a reaction to Bleacher Report proposals
If you think an all nba player is worth a role player and a pick you smoking crack. PJ on his best day is Randle through 80% of the season
@@liferealgood Old Randle is dead, that's what you don't seem to understand. He's half was he's with all those injuries. Not to mention PJ went to the finals and performed decently (was a key player in the OKC series), unlike playoff choker Randle.
The knicks will never get a trade like there for him, ever
@@jdand12 point stands the same. Plus dude analyzed it like it makes any sense
That much? Holy...
No way. Julius inefficient and he turns into the Dak of basketball in playoffs. No numbers! Melts down. No way.
The Knicks will keep their dollar rather than trade it for four quarters or anything less. Let’s go Knicks.
Garland need to get out, he needs to be the point guard , Mitchell took his spot
That would be a steal for the Knicks, they get a back up big which is a absolute need for the Knicks, and the Mavericks would have to rely on Dwight Powell. If they don't want PJ they can trade him with along the Maverick picks.
You would send out an ALL NBA PF in his prime for a backup Center? And call it a win? The Randle disrespect is wild.
@@liferealgoodYes I would, The Knicks need a backup center, and with the assets of PJ, Hardy, and draft picks they could get another depth piece, the Mavericks would have to rely on Dwight Powell as their back up center which would be horrible, the Mavericks don't need a below average defender, and someone who wants the ball.
@@beef2503”they could get another depth” bro they don’t need anymore depth. They nine rotation deep right now. A backup center is a terrible trade off. On face value that’s a terrible trade for both teams. Knicks better with Randle than a backup center who before Dallas was best known for getting yammer on consistently.
@@liferealgood Point is, the Knicks need a back up center and Gafford can be that, Mitchell Robinson isn't going to be healthy all year, the Mavericks get a below average defender, a player who needs the ball and the Knicks get what they want, a backup center. You could never have too much depth you can always improve your team. Also every center gets posterized what is that logic?
@@beef2503 bruh a backup center at the COST of losing an all nba player. A backup center. In what world is losing 25/10/5 a game to gain a backup center make any sense? A non-shooting backup center at that. Literally can’t even stretch the floor.
Dallas should trade for DeAndre ayton. Portland will unload him halfway through the season. It'd be a good fit
Mavs don’t need Randle at all just 2 way wing players
The randle trade is super unrealistic. Your giving up a 24/9/5 guy for worse players. This trade makes no sense at all. Knicks should keep randle by all means. He’s their second option in scoring and if we traded randle in this case it would be bad since it would only be Brunson mainly scoring. This trade makes no sense for the Knicks, not even a first round pick too. A definite lose for the Knicks. Its also a weird fir for the mavs since randle needs the ball more and your sharing the ball with luka and Kyrie? It won’t work well.
The Knicks would never 😂😂
Magic trading a guy that just had a breakout season???????
I am a Mavs fan, and want nothing to do with that trade.
Lol ill never understand why people are high on randle
Why would the hawks do that for Lauri when they js drafted risache
Suggs and isaac for garland
Your not winning any chip w Myles turner as you center
These zoomed in edits making me dizzy
No chance magic trade Suggs for garland ,
Please stop shipping Randle off lol
Lol jazz needa hurry up and trade lauri…dude finna be on a expiring contract
Luke and Randle WILL NOT WORK OUT. They will but heads.
the Mavs aint giving up valuable players for a player Knicks should be attaching picks to..to get rid off
Bad calls I can't see it
Trade package for Randle is trash
Terrible trade for mavs they dont need him having depth is better
The Cleveland- Orlando trade is one of the few fake trades that make sense
Suggs + Mobley is unfair and it paves the way for an Allen-Ingram swap. Suggs makes way sense next to Mitchell than Garland and Carter makes way sense next to Mobley than Allen.
The Orlando side... Well it certainly changes their identity. Garland - Banchero actions could be pretty nasty though and the theoretical on ball/off ball version of Garland makes sense with Paolo/Franz and they have the size to protect him
Hell no. That is a HORRIBLE trade for the Cavs. Any GM who accepts that needs to be fired
@@Phoenix-pm2qr How?
Garland - Mitchell doesn't work on defense. Allen - Mobley doesn't work offense. Cleveland has been trying to find bench offense for years.
This trade solves all three issues at once.
And if you follow that up by trading Allen, Tyson and LeVert for Ingram you replace whatever offense you lost from trading Garland.
Now you're better on offense with Carter's spacing and passing replacing Allen and bumping Mobley closer to the basket. And better on defense with Suggs -- a guy who is basically Gen Z Jrue Holiday -- replacing your worst defender
Siakam & ingram w/o a Center is a hahahahahahahahaha
Dat cavs magic trade is nasty work
Hoops Reference has got to be one of the clueless NBA channels. Do these people even watch NBA games? I think they just look at stats and highlights.
Randle is better than Pj Washington and gafford and Better than keener and Powell put Together the Mavs would win this trade
Lauri Markkanen worth two 1st round picks? LMFAO L take! 🤡
Randle will never give you a full season. Too many injuries. And when he got to the playoffs with the knicks, he was a total bust!
FUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCCCCCCCCCCCCCK NOOOOOOOO to whatever ignoramus Knicks fan proposed Randle to the Mavericks.
nah
Hell no
Wtf Y would the Knicks do that
Fuck what the mavs need
Knicks is a better fit for Randle
the mavericks don't need julius lol, the knicks need a back up center and fuck what the knicks want
I think thr Garland Trade is really interessting to be honest
What about Ingram to ATL for Capela and a few pieces?
danny still thinking other GMs will trade away their teams futures after the CBA rule changes is ridiculous 😂
all these dumass trades none of them happening 😑
Why would magic want more guards?? They need bigmen.. trading away one useful bigman they have is dumb
These are horrible trade
You don't watch Knicks games. Leave that to Knicks content creators. Julius Randle is an excellent passer with a high IQ. Last season he moved the ball well and made his shots off of movement instead of spit up post play.
Wait for the playoffs :) you won’t say the same
@@evenbest4952 I just said I'm MFFL . obviously I don't watch NY
trash
@@RW0Acri yeah I will
Because I stand on what I say
These trades suck
Mavs wouldn’t ever trade for Randle lmao. Trash video
wow all these trades are ass
Markannen to Warriors, Garland to Lakers, B.I to Rockets, Randle to Spurs
😂
Not trading Suggs lol ruins the identity Mabye isssaic and if we trade Wendell I need Jarret back will throw in some picks
F that. Cavs should slam the phone and laugh. He need wings and guys who can shoot
Why give away one if the few guys who can score for a bunch of bums who cannot shoot? Cavs already have defensive studs in Mobley, Wade, Okoko, and Allen.
i like non of this trades... the magic should keep their young core togerher, the cavs maybe should desl DG... the hawks need a real idea first, the jazz too. the mavs and knicks look great, why should they trade. and the pacersdeal would not provide improvement, turner is too important.
Lets goooo!!!! I got first comment
W
First