This was an extremely helpful introduction to Field Theory. It was easy to understand and seems to cover enough to help me understand a more in-depth study of the concepts. Thank you!
This is a really fantastic summation of Bourdieu's field theory. Thank you so much. At 18:21 you reference Walther 2005, 13 and I s imply cannot find this reference anywhere. Are you able to provide more details on this reference, please? Thanks once again.
Hi Craig. My apologies for the poor referencing. It should say Walther 2014. Here is the paper from which the excert is taken: link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-658-05700-8_2
This is a fantastic video, and it is extremely appreciated. This theory is spot on and has been proven to be valid endless times.
Thanks for your support!
This was an extremely helpful introduction to Field Theory. It was easy to understand and seems to cover enough to help me understand a more in-depth study of the concepts. Thank you!
Very happy to have helped. Thanks for your comment!
All this makes very logical sense to me. Thanks for the production.
By far the best Bourdieu video ever!
Thanks for the comment! It is appreciated.
An absolutely amazing introduction to market theories of art especially useful when you extend it to the algorithm in marketing.
Very good video. Love that you included Nomos. Seems like a common misunderstanding among many to confuse doxa with nomos.
amazing!
Lovely
Excellent.
20 people selected the dislike button because it's not what the majority would select.
This was very interesting, thanks.
Wow really nicely put together and informative video, thanks.
Your welcome. Thanks for the comment!
This video is excellent! Thank you
Your Welcome. Thanks for the comment!
Great video! Thank you so much :)
Cheers! Thanks for commenting!
Thanks so much. such a very helpful video.
Brilliant video!
Very good explanation overall, thank you for the video, keep ti up :!
Thanks!
Good narrative
This is a really fantastic summation of Bourdieu's field theory. Thank you so much. At 18:21 you reference Walther 2005, 13 and I s imply cannot find this reference anywhere. Are you able to provide more details on this reference, please? Thanks once again.
Hi Craig. My apologies for the poor referencing. It should say Walther 2014. Here is the paper from which the excert is taken: link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-658-05700-8_2
Thank you! Now Im ready to make my paper :)
You are welcome. Best of luck with the paper!
great clarifications !
thank you so much, great explanations!
Brilliant! :-)
Paul sent me here and it was kinda dry ngl. 'Ray it bois
jenny's class wasssuuuuppppppppppppppppppp
.AVANTGUARD.
*THIS* is why I wanted to major in Sociology. So fyi: Stanford is a ripoff.