Wow this video is way better than i expected. I really think you got to the heart of the situation in your explanation without really choosing sides. Well done!!
Congrats bro for the 1st sponsor....in fact your channel is the best tech channel that i have encountered till date. The best part about your videos is that they keep improving in terms of quality over time 👍🏻
6:35 It is not available on any iPhone like you’ve said. You have to have Apple A9 chip or later (which is available on iPhone 6s later). I have an iPhone 6 and I’m really sad that I Cannot have this 😢
Seems both companies are dependent on each other. 1. If google doesn't release the product first, apple will not show interest and don't develop a greater product. 2. If apple don't make a greater product google will never know their problems and will never rectify. So, both companies are in sync. That's called a good competition.
DualG-Tech, that is your opinion, I know the opposite to be true. I have studied IT and have a small business where I do IT. I understand technology obviously you don't as you enjoy the company that is more of a fad or hipster type company. I choose quality, functionality, and intuitiveness instead of the walled garden.
DualG -Tech lol, I will firmly disagree. Android is miles ahead of iOS if you compare both. Google did portrait mode much better than Apple without using actual hardware. Apple is only winning in hardware but again Samsung just stomps it again.
You can see Google following Apple on the hardware path when they first make fun at Apple for getting rid of the headphone jack, and then doing the same later to sell their own Google labeled earbuds.
Gopnik Mihail Well first and foremost, you are not everyone. So not everybody is going to like Android more than iOS. That is why i think that your point is biased. Android and iOS have different approaches and target different groups of people. Some like it simple, like a closed ecosystem or use the great apps for productivity or creativitiy, some prefer being able to do everything with their device with a huge variety of devices for less. If you insist on one OS being better than another, then you just dont understand how phones and tablets work.
I suppose Google and Apple have coexisted for so long on polarly opposite strategies, because these strategies made them serve largely complementary markets and customer's interests and therefore never really posed a competition to each other. Now that they start to adopt each other's philosophies they will compete more. Short-term, this will be good for the consumer, because it will force them to outdo each other in designing better and/or cheaper products. Long-term that might result in one of them coming out on top and eventually swallowing or "killing" the other. We will see...
Apple: Quality Hardware, Long lasting support and craving for perfection Google: Beautiful Software, life-changing services and attention to users demands If these two ever start working together someday, technology will develop at a pace of 4 times of today
Make video on "Why do big companies flagship phones don't have flagship batteries ie 5100". Till now my Lenovo p2 (after one year) have the best battery in any smartphone.
without better energy density, bigger batteries mean bigger phones. This means thicker( I personally don't care about this) or a larger phone (which I do care about. My s8 is big enough for me, anything else is too much for me) and with phone being larger it will just have a larger screen that will drain even more battery. the hardware inside phones are also getting more efficient too so smaller batteries will last longer.
Apple's approach used to be different while Steve Jobs was around, but since his passing, it's true: Apple wait for safe bets in terms of products. This however also means that they seemingly lag behind the competition, and many feel like they are the just the shadow of their former shelf.
Not really true. Look at the MacBooks. Everyone was and some still are so mad that USB A, HDMI and all the other traditional ports were taken. Just like Steve did with the MacBook Air. iPhone X controversial as well.
As long as people blindly buying their products, they will keep making money so from a business perspective they are doing great and they shouldn't change a thing. Personally I think that Tim Cook is butchering Steve Jobs's legacy and Apple went from the industry leader in innovation to a manufacturer of overly expensive products which are almost a year behind the competition, while focusing too much on design while usability takes a backseat. And they have so much money they could really-really innovate and be an industry leader again, but instead they are just lagging behind, it's kind of puzzling. If you look at an Apple keynote from Steve Jobs's time, he was really proud how Apple products are faster and better than the competition. Today you don't want to compare them to the competition because they would fail, or be on par at best. Sometimes I think Tim Cook is being paid by Google or Microsoft to bring down Apple with these products. But thanks to the herd mentality of the customers, they are doing very well. Tim Cook is definitely not a 'product person' and won't take pride in making truly great and innovative products and dreaming big, just about making money for the company. While you cannot find another 'Steve Jobs', Tim Cook was not a good choice to lead the company. And without Jobs' Iphone, they would be down the drain with this mentality already.
Peter Suranyi, while I do agree with you, Apple does not seemingly lag behind the competition. They actually do lag behind the competition and a lot of Iphone users are seeing this and making the switch. I don't see Apple or Google going away either.
Apple's design which android copied and optimized/stable ecosystem are what make the brand premium that said both platforms have pros/cons and room for improvement.
Apple's strategy is deeper than we think. If a product is released, it is always good. In fact, this has happened for so long that now if Apple releases any product, even if it is not good people a still get it because Apple has never had a bad product.
Orbite - Edits Apple couldn’t fully buy Google but Android they could. Would be a waste though, since Apple takes a majority of the smartphone profits.
gotta appreciate Apple for bringing such premium hardware to da masses and inspiring other hardware manufacturers while appreciating Google for bringing such premium software to da masses and inspiring other internet services :D
Awesome tech talks! Probably the best in-depth tech talks of company ideology on youtube right now! (My opinion) Keep up the good job! Can’t wait on your uploads!
Finally a video which is not making controversial stuff and comment wars so finally i got a channel which got tech loving subscribers instead of a brand or ass loving audience? Cool then😀
There is a difference between overall company strategy and cherrypicked cases. The point made in the video is that Apple does not have a strategy of launching experimental products and then killing them off if they don't pan out.
Hrithwik Bharadwaj hardware wasnt broken software was thats how all phone makers do it like samsung with bixby, google with pixel 2 xl screen, razer phone with camera, essential with camera you see almost everyone does because software can be fixed later but hardware cant
This is the nature of machine learning, it's not trial and error experiment. ML needs more data to improve it’s algorithm. This delay is the price of privacy. Google use GDrive photos to feed it’s ML system, thus improving it’s ML abilities.
This is a fine exampe of how Apple is adopting more Google'sh strategies. These phones are relatively new and reflect a lot of the ideological changes the company has gone through over the years. Allowing themselves to take more risks with obvious beta features
Saggit iPhone X.... Let's correct something here...this is true when jobs was alive but now apple can't release an iOS like they use too anymore. Shows the important of a man that sees the picture.
Dude, your topics are amazing and show that you have unique thoughts. But you can polish the ideas and theories more, I believe. Last but not least, you've GOTTA do something with your hair. I mean, look at MKBHD, Lew from unbox, Linus. You've GOTTA DO SOMETHING. The rest is GOOD. Cheers.
At the *very* least, they make premium-bodied devices. I've had 4 laptops (2 HP, 1 Dell, and 1 Asus) physically self-destruct on me under normal use (whether it's the top casing, or hinges breaking apart and failing) because of 95% of their price being made up of the CPU/GPU/RAM and 5% being the chassis. Seriously, cheap plastics and a 7lb 17.3" form factor is a recipe for self-destructing housing. Meanwhile, my two cousins' 2006 Macbook Pros are still in mint condition in 2018, even after one got freaking *RUN OVER BY A CAR* in 2010. I've had over $2500 worth of Windows laptops break from 2012 to 2016, while those $2700 Macbook Pros are still in excellent working condition to this very day.
"Apple don't abandon anything" Well, I'm not sure about that. I think that new cheap move of slowing down iPhones is cosidered raping not just abandoning :/
The point of slowing down old iPhones is to reduce power consumption. Why? It's because the old batteries in old iPhones started to lose their power capacity, thus decreasing the maximum amount of power those batteries can give. If Apple didn't slow down those old iPhones, then those iPhones will just randomly shut down without any warning while doing heavy tasks. That's because the battery can't give enough power to the CPU to get the work done. Imagine having your gaming PC suddenly shut down in the middle of a game due to a bad power supply. That will be the exact same thing that will happen to those old iPhones if they weren't slowed down.
both apple and google have not focused on delivery of quality long lasting products, Apple doesn't believe in repairs, that is a shit move for customers especially in India, the economy is not as what is in USA and people are buying too expensive phones due to rigorous marketing.
then their is MS, the company which start or innovate new hardware, but fails to capitalize on it. Whereas Google and Apple waits until MS product dies, so they can release theirs polished products.
abhilash jena Microsoft basically relies on large organizations & basically using their networks to expose the public to their products. this can be debilitating because it gets seen as formal (which closes access to the personal information you'd need for advertising which you can get via casual relationships). also Microsoft relied on private in-house access to technology support (IT department). this is historically because they allowed use of different hardware components but didn't have the interactions of those planned, so everything was very specialized. compare this though to the genius bars at physical Apple stores. people do like that competence but with Microsoft's model there were too many things needed to sell competence. also in an economy where large corporate business structures are unstable, Microsoft are too. (basically because automation & it takes like less than 100 people to get a billion dollar business these days.) basically Microsoft is incompetent with casual networking skills. they are competent in formalized networking. basically Microsoft is the technology sector equivalent of Hillary Rodham Clinton in USAmerican politics.
Google follows what the end users want and then do it.. Apple use their trained people to decide what is best. That's the difference and thats why android is a mess of unnecessary stuff. Because people who don't know what they are talking about get just say something on the internet and then Google do what they want
They use different strategy, but both are successful... *Google's strategy:* target tech savvy, professional, newbie, casual users, literally everyone *Apple's strategy:* target hipsters, simpletons, the uninformed
Microsoft, Apple's direct competitor, follows Google's plan of experimentation. Well, Apple is currently the world's biggest company. So you can guess which strategy is better on the long-term.
Google is and always a search and marketing company, mining on informations and pushing AI is their thing. Apple is always focusing on human and well design tech and a very different software. Apple brand is very strong and you can only understand once you are in the ecosystem.
Adwait Sharma apples innovation comes from every Android, honestly why try so hard and waste money on being innovative when you can let dozens of others companies do it,I'm not a apple fan boy,but I respect there hustle.
Dude, please don't go along the sponsored video path. Your content is so good because it is spot on and not full of ads. I liked that. I have watched all of your videos. Ok, I understand Skillshare is a sponsor, but don't follow the path of other channels like @RealEngineering. They have videos that begin and end with ads with content that sometimes feel created only to display between the ads. Don't do that please!
Gopnik Mihail first you need a pen use it and second look at it, that is not a smartphone. Apple made the first smartphones and everyone else copied them
Apple formula of watch and learn is good, but there are a lot of China phone maker know that Apple's formula is the successful one so they follow Apple's path of making their phone. For example, when fingerprint on phone came out, a lot china manufacturer followed too, when apple made dual camera, china phone maker followed too, when iphoneX with notch came out, china phone followed too with A MUCH COMPETITIVE price. That's why Apple felt threatened, and this might be one of the driving cause of the trade war between china and US.
Apple user here. There are a few Apple products that don't fit the description that Apple extensively tests things first to get them working properly before releasing them. Apple Maps was a buggy and broken mess for at least half a year when it launched. iPhone 4 had a universal antenna problem that prompted Apple to give out free bump cases for all users. And iOS 11 has been the buggiest iPhone OS release ever. I had to revert back to iOS 10 because iOS 11 was severely draining my battery even on stand-by. iOS 11 is also the first time I've ever experienced slowdown and random restarts on an iPhone. This isn't just me, there are widespread reports of these issues from many iOS 11 users.
The first video i've seen in this channel was Lumnia 950 review and i was fascinated with the quality of your videos (back then when you had much much less subs) and subscribed instantly. I'm so happy that you are getting bigger and bigger! Congratulations for your first sponsor!
Studying business and being a tech geek myself, I find your channel truly inspiring and informative. I'm always excited to see a new video posted. Thank you for all the quality content! :)
Google as a starship captain vs apple as a starship captain. Google: "FULL SPEED AHEAD" Pilot: but captain the calculations aren't done yet! Google: "I SAID FULL SPEED AHEAD!" Apple: "..." Pilot: "shouldn't we get going?" Apple: "wait and see if Google makes it first, if they do, full speed ahead but on a safer route." Yes I know how stupid this is.
Mentioned this video on: betanews.com/2018/01/15/are-progressive-web-apps-pwas-the-future-of-mobile/ "Are Progressive Web Apps (PWAs) the future of mobile" not so sure on: > " ... Championed by Google, ... " The in_house, and-or out_house argument has been a standard business problem. In both computing & internet worlds, these issues have always been debated, under different names. Each "new" feature and innovation starts as an out_house, foreign invasion t the status-quo. If it shows worth, some in_house operators will then try to bring it away from the out_house world. Microsoft is now debating internally more openly now: should "Cortana" stop being an alien foreigner to the operating system, or deeply & tightly embedded? Apple's BSD (Unix-type) operating systems are secretly following Microsoft's spaghetti threading, by tightly embedding the "progressive-applications" into the tightly "efficient" code. This is opposite to the Unix principles of having well-functioning independent units, unified by an expanding architecture. "Efficiency" is given much higher value, in regards to other factors: reliability, versatility, etc. As Apple has shown, it forces its (irrational & religious) devotees into expensive iTaxation, because it offers quick, instant, learning-free "solutions". When these locked in "solutions" become less financially profitable for its ultra-wealthy investors, it forces it Apple devotees into paying more iTaxes. These iTaxes involve more hardware, software & firmware. No learning (seemingly) needed. Find the RUclips video on this: "Why are Apple and Google so different?", by "TechAltar", Published on Jan 12, 2018. 8mins 56secs > " ... Comparing the innovation cultures of Apple and Google (The Story Behind Ep. 27). "
[GD] Dj4dasher, sorry man. I love Windows 98 and XP, but they are both pretty much dead. There is no more support for either of them. Windows 7 still rocks, not as good as Windows 10 Pro, but it still is a viable alternative.
Apple does not abandon anything? Mac Pro, Server, professional expandable and competitive productivity hardware, java6, mac server, mac mini, ... the headphone jack.... should i continue?
Edge is fucked by whoever in M$ decided to wrap it in a UWP box, which makes it Windows 10 (which SUCKS) only. Yes, Windows 7~8.1 don't hold the most market share anymore but there still is a large amount, some of those users are even IE users today (I still use IE 11 for basic browsing as it uses far less RAM comparing to Chrome) what kind of stupid strategy is it to block them from accessing Edge?
Apple: a user interface (human-feeling-based) company e.g. operating system + hardware = a single UI Google: an infrastructure (data-flowing-based) company e.g. Android OS = the infrastructure for mobile devices
A video that answers a question that NO ONE who knows anything about these two companies, a MANUFACTURER and an INTERNET SERVICES PROVIDER doesn't know. That they sem to both be striving to become vertically integrated soup to nuts providers, in=s interesting, but is unlikelt to change the way that they approach each tier.
Thanks for the overview on these IT Tech giants. I think Google's strategy is best in this domain because it fosters creativity and flexibility and individual entrepreneurship. Also, this corporation is much less rigidly structured than Apple. I see Google as the typical 21st century/Millennial corporation, while Apple is still very late 20th century/Generation X in its approach to business, HR and PR. So, Google is all the way up for me when it comes to IT. Still, as an early Millennial, I wouldn't work with/for them as I prefer my own ventures/projects, nor would I sell them whatever products/apps I come up with. I much prefer the concept of Open Source/freeware: it makes the World go round and sound, free from money-tricks :).
Things seem so simple and obvious once TechAlter explains them 😀😀
Digressingme nice saying! That definitely applies to him!
Digressingme ...That's not a saying...is it?
Digressingme Ah that's more like it! Cheers.
So true
The answer is mottos:
Google's is: don't be evil
Apple's is:
Let's milk as much as possible before they realise
Wow this video is way better than i expected. I really think you got to the heart of the situation in your explanation without really choosing sides. Well done!!
Congrats bro for the 1st sponsor....in fact your channel is the best tech channel that i have encountered till date. The best part about your videos is that they keep improving in terms of quality over time 👍🏻
You're probably the smartest guy on RUclips, lol. To make this kind of thing interesting is really hard. Nice work...
Hi
Thanks for the link, I'll try it out and see what I can learn. Keep on the good work!
Wow dude! I really like your content! Keep up the good work!
6:35 It is not available on any iPhone like you’ve said. You have to have Apple A9 chip or later (which is available on iPhone 6s later). I have an iPhone 6 and I’m really sad that I Cannot have this 😢
Apple doesn't release unpolished products? Two words: Apple Maps.
They fired the guy who was responsible for it. And then still didn't abandon the product.
And it’s actually comparable to gmaps now if you care to look at it again
TechAltar video = insta-like
Apple = Three piece Suits
Google = Casuals
At-least this is how I see it.
P.S: I'm a google fan boy and I love their Nexus and Pixel devices. I'm also a beginner Android Developer.
Google did officially announce the discontinuation of Tango.
NEVER STOP DOING THE STORY BEHIND SERIES
Eirik Skjørstad Calm down
@@benjamingeorge874 good job
good job
good job
Congrats on your 1st sponsor! Also, great video.
+1
@Natas Liah her? lol
The new animations are great!
Glad you like them, took me ages to make :D
TechAltar It's worth it!
i have animation off is it ok. no
Congrats on your first sponsor!!! Milestone unlocked
Absolutely! Thanks :)
Firsten sponsoren congratsen
Seems both companies are dependent on each other.
1. If google doesn't release the product first, apple will not show interest and don't develop a greater product.
2. If apple don't make a greater product google will never know their problems and will never rectify.
So, both companies are in sync. That's called a good competition.
Buro Dadu agreed
Buro Dadu yay capitalism
Buro Dadu except apple’s way better
DualG-Tech, that is your opinion, I know the opposite to be true. I have studied IT and have a small business where I do IT. I understand technology obviously you don't as you enjoy the company that is more of a fad or hipster type company. I choose quality, functionality, and intuitiveness instead of the walled garden.
DualG -Tech lol, I will firmly disagree. Android is miles ahead of iOS if you compare both. Google did portrait mode much better than Apple without using actual hardware. Apple is only winning in hardware but again Samsung just stomps it again.
Glad that this video is completely unbiased, so you won’t start a war in the comments. Great video!
Yeah, but 90% of the People, who know TechAltar, already knew that ;)
FFFFfffuuuck google ! (there !)
Oh yeah? ANDROID>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>APPLE
Yeah! Because fuck appleshit!
lvlaple4Ever
how do you compare a fucking OS to a company? idiot noob
This channel is the definition of quality over quantity
Well said :)
@@KitsGravity good job
Unlike apple which is neither
It's a joke
You can see Google following Apple on the hardware path when they first make fun at Apple for getting rid of the headphone jack, and then doing the same later to sell their own Google labeled earbuds.
yeah google is hypocritical af, and they still make all of their money selling out their users
Yeah the Pixel phones are basically Google iPhones in my opinion.
Gopnik Mihail
Thats pretty biased to say that.
Mabirc Holy shit dude I see you on every video that has something to do with Apple.
Gopnik Mihail
Well first and foremost, you are not everyone. So not everybody is going to like Android more than iOS.
That is why i think that your point is biased.
Android and iOS have different approaches and target different groups of people. Some like it simple, like a closed ecosystem or use the great apps for productivity or creativitiy, some prefer being able to do everything with their device with a huge variety of devices for less.
If you insist on one OS being better than another, then you just dont understand how phones and tablets work.
I suppose Google and Apple have coexisted for so long on polarly opposite strategies, because these strategies made them serve largely complementary markets and customer's interests and therefore never really posed a competition to each other. Now that they start to adopt each other's philosophies they will compete more. Short-term, this will be good for the consumer, because it will force them to outdo each other in designing better and/or cheaper products. Long-term that might result in one of them coming out on top and eventually swallowing or "killing" the other. We will see...
Everest314 yeah.i agree
Apple: Quality Hardware, Long lasting support and craving for perfection
Google: Beautiful Software, life-changing services and attention to users demands
If these two ever start working together someday, technology will develop at a pace of 4 times of today
Well, they are copying each other and improve by looking at each other's product, trying to one-up the competition.
Manish Bisht I disagree, I think competition is good for progress.
Sweet Roll true
Sweet Roll Here come the Android fanboys. Did you say your pledge of allegiance to Google this morning? No? Better hurry up. They’re watching you!
lol, fuck off ishill. Praise DuARTe
I love Apple maps.
Said no one ever
akshay kr but it is more accurate than Google maps for some places and other places it is just crap
It always makes me smile when TechAltar uploads! Who else feels the same?
Meeeee
I am
TechAltar makes me smile every day
Wow you replied! Thanks Man 🙏
I like your pace, its one of few channels which should be watched without increasing playback speed.
Again: Get Patreon. Shut up and take my money!
don't shut up though, thinking about it
Lol! I am considering it, thanks
Legends are watching this video on Windows phone .
hah, a real holdout here!
With what?? A browser? 😂
This is so sad, almost crying... :'(
Just switched to a Nokia 6 from a Lumia 650. I hate Android, but kind of need it.
i hate google services but cannot not use them.
I like apple services but sometimes they have better alternatives.
great vid really loving the story behind series and the information on certain things ive wondered about being explained in a professional manner.
Make video on "Why do big companies flagship phones don't have flagship batteries ie 5100". Till now my Lenovo p2 (after one year) have the best battery in any smartphone.
Pratik Jain They always trying to push a better chip.
Adding more RAM or a bigger battery, etc are so lazy and not so innovative
Bigger batteries means fatter phones which arent as pretty which means less hype
Fatter and heavier
You clearly Haven't heard of Mi Max 2.
without better energy density, bigger batteries mean bigger phones. This means thicker( I personally don't care about this) or a larger phone (which I do care about. My s8 is big enough for me, anything else is too much for me) and with phone being larger it will just have a larger screen that will drain even more battery. the hardware inside phones are also getting more efficient too so smaller batteries will last longer.
Apple's approach used to be different while Steve Jobs was around, but since his passing, it's true: Apple wait for safe bets in terms of products. This however also means that they seemingly lag behind the competition, and many feel like they are the just the shadow of their former shelf.
Peter Suranyi they have taken some harsh steps like removing fingerprint sensor and headphone jack, but overall they are playing safe.
Not really true. Look at the MacBooks. Everyone was and some still are so mad that USB A, HDMI and all the other traditional ports were taken.
Just like Steve did with the MacBook Air. iPhone X controversial as well.
As long as people blindly buying their products, they will keep making money so from a business perspective they are doing great and they shouldn't change a thing. Personally I think that Tim Cook is butchering Steve Jobs's legacy and Apple went from the industry leader in innovation to a manufacturer of overly expensive products which are almost a year behind the competition, while focusing too much on design while usability takes a backseat. And they have so much money they could really-really innovate and be an industry leader again, but instead they are just lagging behind, it's kind of puzzling. If you look at an Apple keynote from Steve Jobs's time, he was really proud how Apple products are faster and better than the competition. Today you don't want to compare them to the competition because they would fail, or be on par at best. Sometimes I think Tim Cook is being paid by Google or Microsoft to bring down Apple with these products. But thanks to the herd mentality of the customers, they are doing very well. Tim Cook is definitely not a 'product person' and won't take pride in making truly great and innovative products and dreaming big, just about making money for the company. While you cannot find another 'Steve Jobs', Tim Cook was not a good choice to lead the company. And without Jobs' Iphone, they would be down the drain with this mentality already.
Peter Suranyi, while I do agree with you, Apple does not seemingly lag behind the competition. They actually do lag behind the competition and a lot of Iphone users are seeing this and making the switch. I don't see Apple or Google going away either.
Peter Suryani, I think you are right about Tim Cook. He is killing the legacy that Steve Jobs built. Apple lags behind by two, not one year.
Everything is fine but why does iPhone 8 exist if they were such perfections.
They like to wait.. They're waiting on completely abandoning 16:9 displays..
Because supply of A-grade OLEDs is limited and just selling 1000+$ phones would make sales plummet.
Very Happy for your First Sponsor...Following your channel since 20k sub and really like your content...Keep up the good work!
Apple sells hardware while Google sells your private data to advertisers
Veeery nice video!! Thanks for it :)
Why are different because apple work mobile and google work all things therfore is different companies
apple gets its customers to believe that its premium when its really not. expensive does not equal good.
DoGiraffe but, Samsung s9 is nearly as expensive...
@@michaelblack8141
No, it isn't.
I don't know in which country you live, but the newest Samsung Galaxy phones are so dirt cheap right now...
Apple's design which android copied and optimized/stable ecosystem are what make the brand premium that said both platforms have pros/cons and room for improvement.
Ha! Android copying Apple! Hahaha! Good one!
@@seacue615 Google's original prototye didn't have a touchscreen but when they found out apple was using one they redesigned it adding the feature
Google killing things that don't work immediately? DID YOU FORGET WHAT HAPPENED WITH GOOGLE PLUS?!?!?!
Google plus isnt dead, its still alive but not in its orginal form. Its connecting google products together
Googel life make easy.
apple make life expensive.
Google makes life easy, *to be spied on* .
grrr 。 yes google is spying on us! They even made it official! I'm switching to iOS ASAP!
NoName i don't get your sarcasm here! Check the recent tech news!
BRAYDOS_ Apple is definitely not!
Yash Bhandari Very True
Apple's strategy is deeper than we think. If a product is released, it is always good. In fact, this has happened for so long that now if Apple releases any product, even if it is not good people a still get it because Apple has never had a bad product.
*Android Always*
Unless Apple bought it ....
Elias Dolinsek I actually forgot the "😂" emoji
Mustafa Mamuwala Well, Apple already have better coded mobile OS lol
Orbite - Edits Apple couldn’t fully buy Google but Android they could. Would be a waste though, since Apple takes a majority of the smartphone profits.
How could they buy an open - source project?
Mustafa Mamuwala buying android will only help them to kill the competition nothing else
gotta appreciate Apple for bringing such premium hardware to da masses and inspiring other hardware manufacturers while appreciating Google for bringing such premium software to da masses and inspiring other internet services :D
Awesome video! Even more awesome as Techaltar got it's 1st sponsor! 👍😊
Your channel is growing. Keep working hard, you are sure to get success!
something about your voice, your face, your interests...I don't know but thank you for helping me sleep.
Awesome tech talks! Probably the best in-depth tech talks of company ideology on youtube right now! (My opinion) Keep up the good job! Can’t wait on your uploads!
Finally a video which is not making controversial stuff and comment wars so finally i got a channel which got tech loving subscribers instead of a brand or ass loving audience? Cool then😀
Worth waiting every video proves so.😍😘😍😘
Thanks man, glad you like them!
I think that..
Google is technically smart.
And Apple is practically smart.
Apple was popular. They've lost their edge IMO
You left out the part where Google makes almost all its money on ads, and their market value and profits are significantly lower than Apple.
Release first fix later - Apple
iPhone 7Plus Portrait mode and iPhone X Portrait mode selfie
There is a difference between overall company strategy and cherrypicked cases. The point made in the video is that Apple does not have a strategy of launching experimental products and then killing them off if they don't pan out.
Hrithwik Bharadwaj hardware wasnt broken software was thats how all phone makers do it like samsung with bixby, google with pixel 2 xl screen, razer phone with camera, essential with camera you see almost everyone does because software can be fixed later but hardware cant
This is the nature of machine learning, it's not trial and error experiment. ML needs more data to improve it’s algorithm. This delay is the price of privacy. Google use GDrive photos to feed it’s ML system, thus improving it’s ML abilities.
This is a fine exampe of how Apple is adopting more Google'sh strategies. These phones are relatively new and reflect a lot of the ideological changes the company has gone through over the years. Allowing themselves to take more risks with obvious beta features
Saggit iPhone X.... Let's correct something here...this is true when jobs was alive but now apple can't release an iOS like they use too anymore. Shows the important of a man that sees the picture.
Basically Apple exploits wallet while Google exploits your identity
Dude, your topics are amazing and show that you have unique thoughts. But you can polish the ideas and theories more, I believe. Last but not least, you've GOTTA do something with your hair. I mean, look at MKBHD, Lew from unbox, Linus. You've GOTTA DO SOMETHING. The rest is GOOD. Cheers.
"Apple is a premium hardware maker.." hahahaha good one😂
Yeah
People don't pay for Apple brand. They pay for the secure and reliable features or services.
At the *very* least, they make premium-bodied devices.
I've had 4 laptops (2 HP, 1 Dell, and 1 Asus) physically self-destruct on me under normal use (whether it's the top casing, or hinges breaking apart and failing) because of 95% of their price being made up of the CPU/GPU/RAM and 5% being the chassis. Seriously, cheap plastics and a 7lb 17.3" form factor is a recipe for self-destructing housing. Meanwhile, my two cousins' 2006 Macbook Pros are still in mint condition in 2018, even after one got freaking *RUN OVER BY A CAR* in 2010. I've had over $2500 worth of Windows laptops break from 2012 to 2016, while those $2700 Macbook Pros are still in excellent working condition to this very day.
Google certainly is not.
Bend gate
"Apple don't abandon anything" Well, I'm not sure about that. I think that new cheap move of slowing down iPhones is cosidered raping not just abandoning :/
The point of slowing down old iPhones is to reduce power consumption. Why? It's because the old batteries in old iPhones started to lose their power capacity, thus decreasing the maximum amount of power those batteries can give. If Apple didn't slow down those old iPhones, then those iPhones will just randomly shut down without any warning while doing heavy tasks. That's because the battery can't give enough power to the CPU to get the work done. Imagine having your gaming PC suddenly shut down in the middle of a game due to a bad power supply. That will be the exact same thing that will happen to those old iPhones if they weren't slowed down.
One of the few best genuine RUclips channel ❤️
Google Pixar not have a good design and camera is best on Apple and design
Why don't 2018 mid range phones use 2017 flagship processor....????
yes
They don't
yes
What are you trying to say?
Subin George yes
both apple and google have not focused on delivery of quality long lasting products, Apple doesn't believe in repairs, that is a shit move for customers especially in India, the economy is not as what is in USA and people are buying too expensive phones due to rigorous marketing.
then their is MS, the company which start or innovate new hardware, but fails to capitalize on it. Whereas Google and Apple waits until MS product dies, so they can release theirs polished products.
abhilash jena Microsoft basically relies on large organizations & basically using their networks to expose the public to their products. this can be debilitating because it gets seen as formal (which closes access to the personal information you'd need for advertising which you can get via casual relationships). also Microsoft relied on private in-house access to technology support (IT department). this is historically because they allowed use of different hardware components but didn't have the interactions of those planned, so everything was very specialized. compare this though to the genius bars at physical Apple stores. people do like that competence but with Microsoft's model there were too many things needed to sell competence. also in an economy where large corporate business structures are unstable, Microsoft are too. (basically because automation & it takes like less than 100 people to get a billion dollar business these days.)
basically Microsoft is incompetent with casual networking skills. they are competent in formalized networking.
basically Microsoft is the technology sector equivalent of Hillary Rodham Clinton in USAmerican politics.
Google follows what the end users want and then do it.. Apple use their trained people to decide what is best. That's the difference and thats why android is a mess of unnecessary stuff. Because people who don't know what they are talking about get just say something on the internet and then Google do what they want
Titan Karate, that's not how it works.
How many of did hit likes👍 b4 playing▶
It's a habit of mine. I do this to all youtube videos. I remove the like if I didn't enjoy the video.
Good habit! :D
Apple waited a decade to make sure that there are no bugs in 'app drawer'
They use different strategy, but both are successful...
*Google's strategy:* target tech savvy, professional, newbie, casual users, literally everyone
*Apple's strategy:* target hipsters, simpletons, the uninformed
Microsoft, Apple's direct competitor, follows Google's plan of experimentation. Well, Apple is currently the world's biggest company. So you can guess which strategy is better on the long-term.
Like for Google👍👍
Is a like for the violation of privacy.
Felix Tessel at least Google isn't slowing down the phones
Nirbhay Shukla Yeah Google doesn‘t (Stock Android) but Samsung does
You make complicated topics so easy to understand.
Anyone else get that bit of a Fiz whenever TechAltar notification pops? Yeah? Yeah?!?
I do :D
Google is and always a search and marketing company, mining on informations and pushing AI is their thing.
Apple is always focusing on human and well design tech and a very different software. Apple brand is very strong and you can only understand once you are in the ecosystem.
Actually this video proves Apple lives off the innovation from Google
Adwait Sharma apples innovation comes from every Android, honestly why try so hard and waste money on being innovative when you can let dozens of others companies do it,I'm not a apple fan boy,but I respect there hustle.
Everyone borrows ideas. That does not mean that Apple doesn't do its own share of innovation.
apple logo should be recycle symbol. they do just that, recycle old technology ots always a 1 to 4 yrs old on release
Saggit show me any innovation that can be linked to apple itself... not other companies
PixelBuds. Innovation.
Chromebook. Innovation.
You should, unless you don’t have access to a brain, know better.
Apple´s got the universal best criteria. Wait, think, do.
anyway... hello?!?! anyone?
what is it mate
Dude, please don't go along the sponsored video path. Your content is so good because it is spot on and not full of ads. I liked that. I have watched all of your videos. Ok, I understand Skillshare is a sponsor, but don't follow the path of other channels like @RealEngineering. They have videos that begin and end with ads with content that sometimes feel created only to display between the ads. Don't do that please!
At least the sponsor is mentioned in the end so it's no biggie. Let the guy earn some well deserved money lol.
Dude his job is RUclips and do the unstableness of RUclips is hard to make money without sponsorship and pateron
Subin George At least the sponsor is not in the same category as the companies/products he talks about.
I don't think the approaches are different. It is just the engineers and developers on both sides work really hard to produce new innovations.
2:45 half backed iPhone X
You have no idea what "half baked" means
Half baked iphone x? Damn, then all other android phones must be a shit pile, not even half baked lol
i just got an iphone, i hate it, but it looks nice, the plus side is, i hardly use it.
Apple invented the smartphone
Gopnik Mihail then what touchscreen phones came before
The IBM simon came out in 1994
Gopnik Mihail first you need a pen use it and second look at it, that is not a smartphone. Apple made the first smartphones and everyone else copied them
ELI ? So what you're trying to say is that all the other companies are copycats and that Apple should have a monopoly?
Sloth Jesz Apple should not have a monopoly but it should be reconsidered that the android is copying Apple
Great dude and channel, you sure deserve M after your subs number and not a K :)
Team Apple 👋🏽
SamJam #teamneutral
Powdcast they are coming for you! And hate you for no reason. Lol
Team not being stupid and paying for overpriced and overrated fashion statements :D
Team Android *జ్ఞా*
Apple formula of watch and learn is good, but there are a lot of China phone maker know that Apple's formula is the successful one so they follow Apple's path of making their phone. For example, when fingerprint on phone came out, a lot china manufacturer followed too, when apple made dual camera, china phone maker followed too, when iphoneX with notch came out, china phone followed too with A MUCH COMPETITIVE price. That's why Apple felt threatened, and this might be one of the driving cause of the trade war between china and US.
Apple user here. There are a few Apple products that don't fit the description that Apple extensively tests things first to get them working properly before releasing them. Apple Maps was a buggy and broken mess for at least half a year when it launched. iPhone 4 had a universal antenna problem that prompted Apple to give out free bump cases for all users. And iOS 11 has been the buggiest iPhone OS release ever. I had to revert back to iOS 10 because iOS 11 was severely draining my battery even on stand-by. iOS 11 is also the first time I've ever experienced slowdown and random restarts on an iPhone. This isn't just me, there are widespread reports of these issues from many iOS 11 users.
I think Google should stick to Software and Apple to Hardware. They should stick to what they do best. Otherwise they will be replaced!!
Why do you have google chrome listed as an operating system?
Potato King chrome OS for chromebooks
Hey man! Congrats on your first sponsor! Keep doing this awesome content. You have a loyal subscriber from Venezuela
The first video i've seen in this channel was Lumnia 950 review and i was fascinated with the quality of your videos (back then when you had much much less subs) and subscribed instantly. I'm so happy that you are getting bigger and bigger! Congratulations for your first sponsor!
Studying business and being a tech geek myself, I find your channel truly inspiring and informative. I'm always excited to see a new video posted. Thank you for all the quality content! :)
Great video. Next time Consider removing that lamps in the background ,bright object in the background create unnecessary distracted from the subject.
As always you identify the kernel of the argument and make ateriific informative video.. more power to you
Google as a starship captain vs apple as a starship captain.
Google: "FULL SPEED AHEAD"
Pilot: but captain the calculations aren't done yet!
Google: "I SAID FULL SPEED AHEAD!"
Apple: "..."
Pilot: "shouldn't we get going?"
Apple: "wait and see if Google makes it first, if they do, full speed ahead but on a safer route."
Yes I know how stupid this is.
Presence of very deep analysis of
psychological factors. Thank God it didn't turn out like usual!
I'm pretty much like Apple: let the idiots experiment and fail, and I'll just take their working steps and develop it my way! 🤣
No need to watch the clip. Answer: because they are different companies. NEXT QUESTION.
Mentioned this video on:
betanews.com/2018/01/15/are-progressive-web-apps-pwas-the-future-of-mobile/
"Are Progressive Web Apps (PWAs) the future of mobile"
not so sure on:
> " ... Championed by Google, ... "
The in_house, and-or out_house argument has been a standard business problem. In both computing & internet worlds, these issues have always been debated, under different names.
Each "new" feature and innovation starts as an out_house, foreign invasion t the status-quo. If it shows worth, some in_house operators will then try to bring it away from the out_house world. Microsoft is now debating internally more openly now: should "Cortana" stop being an alien foreigner to the operating system, or deeply & tightly embedded?
Apple's BSD (Unix-type) operating systems are secretly following Microsoft's spaghetti threading, by tightly embedding the "progressive-applications" into the tightly "efficient" code. This is opposite to the Unix principles of having well-functioning independent units, unified by an expanding architecture. "Efficiency" is given much higher value, in regards to other factors: reliability, versatility, etc.
As Apple has shown, it forces its (irrational & religious) devotees into expensive iTaxation, because it offers quick, instant, learning-free "solutions". When these locked in "solutions" become less financially profitable for its ultra-wealthy investors, it forces it Apple devotees into paying more iTaxes. These iTaxes involve more hardware, software & firmware. No learning (seemingly) needed.
Find the RUclips video on this:
"Why are Apple and Google so different?", by "TechAltar", Published on Jan 12, 2018.
8mins 56secs
> " ... Comparing the innovation cultures of Apple and Google (The Story Behind Ep. 27). "
Even though, you're quite relentless when it comes to comments, the videos are a joy to watch.
Who cares about Google and Apple, it's all about that Windows 98
[GD] Dj4dasher, sorry man. I love Windows 98 and XP, but they are both pretty much dead. There is no more support for either of them. Windows 7 still rocks, not as good as Windows 10 Pro, but it still is a viable alternative.
+Galen Black bro, I was joking...
[GD] Dj4dasher, LOL....gotcha.
Apple does not abandon anything? Mac Pro, Server, professional expandable and competitive productivity hardware, java6, mac server, mac mini, ... the headphone jack.... should i continue?
Edge is fucked by whoever in M$ decided to wrap it in a UWP box, which makes it Windows 10 (which SUCKS) only.
Yes, Windows 7~8.1 don't hold the most market share anymore but there still is a large amount, some of those users are even IE users today (I still use IE 11 for basic browsing as it uses far less RAM comparing to Chrome) what kind of stupid strategy is it to block them from accessing Edge?
Saw all of your videos and with such great contents, you deserve far more subscribers...can't wait for your next video...
Apple: a user interface (human-feeling-based) company
e.g. operating system + hardware = a single UI
Google: an infrastructure (data-flowing-based) company
e.g. Android OS = the infrastructure for mobile devices
A video that answers a question that NO ONE who knows anything about these two companies, a MANUFACTURER and an INTERNET SERVICES PROVIDER doesn't know. That they sem to both be striving to become vertically integrated soup to nuts providers, in=s interesting, but is unlikelt to change the way that they approach each tier.
Thanks for the overview on these IT Tech giants.
I think Google's strategy is best in this domain because it fosters creativity and flexibility and individual entrepreneurship. Also, this corporation is much less rigidly structured than Apple. I see Google as the typical 21st century/Millennial corporation, while Apple is still very late 20th century/Generation X in its approach to business, HR and PR.
So, Google is all the way up for me when it comes to IT. Still, as an early Millennial, I wouldn't work with/for them as I prefer my own ventures/projects, nor would I sell them whatever products/apps I come up with. I much prefer the concept of Open Source/freeware: it makes the World go round and sound, free from money-tricks :).