Debunking the 'FAKE' claims once and for all
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 6 июн 2023
- Head to squarespace.com/davemckeegan to save 10% off your first purchase of a website or domain using code davemckeegan
Conspiracy theorists claiming the ISS is just CGI, green screens & wires seem very focused on a particular clip which they say proves its all done in a studio - Time to debunk this once and for all
Full original broadcast: • STS-135 Flight Day 7 I...
PATREON: / davemckeegan
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Music by Bensound.com
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
#globe #science #flatearth #ISS #NASA #fakeISS 
Наука
The reason I prefer your videos to any other debunking videos, is that you don't just call the deniers idiots. You actually address their (mostly ridiculous) claims, and then provide a logical explanation.
Many flat earthers don’t really have any respect, and just ignore clear evidence or blabber on about something unrelated when they know their arguement is about to be debunked all the while insulting everyone who disagrees.
To be fair it’s quite impressive for someone to not insult flat earthers.
They ARE denier idiots and some, sorry most, just shout down any rational argument against their position. They ARE morons except for the smart ones making money from this and they are just despicable. I suggest they don't believe in the tripe they promulgate.
I mean Dave Farina calls them idiots but literally has hour long videos going incredibly in depth into why they are wrong.
@@thepapschmearmd I still love guys like Dave Weiss calling ‘showing how they are wrong’ gaslighting. They’ve heard a word know it has a negative connotation but have no clue how you are suppose to use it.
to be fair, a lot of flat earthers are constantly attacking and insulting others, so it's satisfying to see them also get insulted :p
That dog is such a brilliant ventriloquist. You can almost believe it's "Dave" speaking.
🤭🤭🤭
I dont necessarily think it's fake but I find the fact that her hair doesn't flow around freely in the same manner that her necklace does... kind of odd
It looks completely odd
Her hair isn't _supposed_ to flow around freely in the same manner that her necklace does.
@@Jan_StrzeleckiCan you elaborate?
@@carterfifteen Her hair isn't made out of metal.
Explain her floating necklace then.
Speaking from personal perspective, I can say that the source of such skepticism comes largely from a lack of education. Nearly a decade ago I was big on conspiracy theories. As I got older I decided to pursue educational pursuit in maths, sciences, engineering, and technology. The greater my pool of knowledge becomes, the smaller that pocket of conspiratorial thinking becomes.
Sadly, it's easier for these people to hand wave these things away in denial than it is for them to seek valid sources of trustworthy information.
SO you are saying that high school dropouts should NOT go around saying that all of the Engineers and Physicists are wrong?
Good for you!
@@stuartgray5877 Yeah, I didn't buy into all conspiracy theories. For example, I understood the Earth is round, gravity exists, universal constants etc.. However, I would be one to believe that 5G is a government scheme, I could be swayed to agree with moon landing deniers, and I thought the government would cover up UFOs and extraterrestrial contact.
Also: I'd like to mention that the term conspiracy theorist is a bit of a misnomer. Theories are the best tested proof positives that can yield scientific models. It makes more sense to call them hypotheses conspirators. As you can always make a bad hypothesis that you don't bother to test.
Go watch any of the videos done by Austin Witsit because I bet my next paycheck he's a hell of a lot smarter than 90% of anyone commenting here. You could use some humility and judge others less, because not only are their opinions not harming anyone, but most of us aren't bothered by the beliefs of strangers who are stuck an not growing or evolving like we are supposrd to do. You're mostly followers so you wont get behind or support the truth until the mass majority of others do. Its too much work doing any research or investigating of your own isn't it? Just keep believing what masters say, obey and pay your taxes like good sheep.
Really the conspiracy theories to ignore are the ones that are wacky and can be proven false by modern science. For instance, Israeli colonizers and their claiming of Palestinian land. As they say over and over that historically Palestine once belonged to their ancestors. This can obviously be scientifically disproven. Just like Jews being present in Egypt. Yeah, there is nothing historically or scientifically accurate about that whatsoever. According to archaeological findings, they were never there, period.
So yeah, there are countries still colonizing and committing war crimes based on non scientific, non historical lies spun by their religious texts thousands of years ago. Specifically the book of Joshua when the Israelites massacred the Canaanites. Which is literally how Israelis view themselves in this war against Palestine…
Besides, the conspiracies that tend to be worth investigating and at least a bit of looking into, for sure tend to be the ones that no one has yet to disprove. You know, the ones that the media, the government, and most “skeptics” try to change the subject on nervously every time they’re brought up.
Israel is 1 such example…
Child trafficking and Satanic Ritual Abuse is another…
Ah yes the conspiracies that just about every politician refuses to acknowledge, which are the conspiracies that the CIA tends to somehow always strangely be involved in and bury at the last moment right?
Such as child trafficking and satanic ritual abuse. The Satanic Panic, a bunch of crazy bullshit right? Like a precursor to Pizzagate right?
Well…not so fast their Sparky!
As this is one of the bizarre out of this world conspiracies entirely rooted in truth. And at this point we’ve all heard about Epstein Island sure. As well as all of the bizarre pedophile rings that were discovered in the 1970s and and 1980s. No? Well for starters there was the Franklin Scandal Coverup in Omaha, Nebraska, in which a higher up politician named Laurence King was pimping out children to high up elites and politicians in Washington DC. Where he would fly the children out with him, take them to these fancy parties in DC, when after it would get late a second party would start. And they’d basically have an Eyes Wide Shut satanic blood orgy, but much more sadistic and fucked up. Involving adults abusing children. They were also filmed while doing this. For both blackmail purposes, as well as pornography distribution purposes.
North Fox Island, (Yet another pedo island, surprise surprise -_-), off the coast of Lake Michigan near Detroit involved the same stuff except less politicians and more the wealthy elite CEOs of the old Detroit auto companies empire.
Chicago and the Delta Project, Not to mention all of the bizarre connections between John Wayne Gacey, politics and politicians in Chicago connected to both organized crime and the Democratic Party, Dean Correl, Philip Paske, and John Norman’s The Delta Project, a highly sophisticated national child trafficking ring that allegedly produced snuff films and child porn from their kidnapped young male victims.
And at last, our final group…
The Finders, a literal Satanic Cult involved in kidnapping, sexually abusing, and trafficking young children all over the United States, Europe, Canada, Australia, Africa, and Asia (including I kid you not North Korea). Probably used as a way of blackmailing people by taking pictures of the Men and kids involved in these acts.
This all started when 2 suspicious men in black suits were discovered transporting 6 children all between the ages of 2 and 11. The kids were described as “scruffy” and “hungry” and appeared as though they hadn’t bathed in days. After police were called about the children looking hungry and possibly mistreated under suspicious circumstances, the police questioned them and demanded to search the van.
It was in the van police would find a soiled mattress, a fairly sophisticated computer system, cameras, and a collection of photo albums that featured pictures of naked children, as well as photos showing children wearing white robes and adults wearing black robes as they performed a ritualistic sacrifice on a goat.
The men were promptly arrested and the children were taken into protective custody. All of the children medically examined and showed signs of malnourishment and sexual abuse. The 2 oldest children named Marry and Max were interviewed as the 2 men were interrogated.
This next part I’m just going to quote from Wikipedia because…well it’s a lot…
“It was discovered that the children were raised on a farm with little adult supervision, with there being twenty adults and one other child present. The younger children were observed to display behavior indicating they were not used to being in a house or using indoor plumbing, requesting to go outside to use the bathroom, or urinating in their pants (noted to lack underwear). "Max" had a poor concept of time. They explained that they were being “weaned” from their mothers and were rarely allowed inside the house, even sleeping outside. Neighbors observed that the children apparently lived in the farm’s watermelon field. Mary described the 2 men as their "teachers", teaching them to read and "play games".
One game involved disrobing a man, wearing his clothes, and going through his pockets for money (she later revised her statement and asserted that only jackets were involved). The two reported seeing female members of the cult naked and believed this to be another game as well. When questioned about "bad touches" Mary denied sexual abuse but "became very fidgety and wanted to end the interview." At another Finders farm in Virginia, agents recorded cages on the premises, with witnesses asserting they were used to keep children. As of 2022, the full medical and psychological reports are not available for public viewing.
According to U.S. District Court records in Washington, a confidential police source had previously told authorities that the Finders were "a cult" that conducted "brainwashing" techniques at a warehouse and a Glover Park duplex raided by law enforcement. This source told of being recruited by the Finders with promises of "financial reward and sexual gratification" and of being invited by one member to "explore" satanism with them, according to the documents. Police sources said some of the items seized showed pictures of children engaged in what appeared to be "cult rituals." Officials of the U.S. Customs Service said that the material seized included photos showing children involved in bloodletting ceremonies of animals and one photograph of a child in chains.
It was noted by a detective during the investigation that documents were discovered with detailed instructions about methods to obtain children for unspecified purposes (including the impregnation of female members of the community, purchasing, trading, and kidnapping), but neither the documents nor anyone else with knowledge of them could later be found.”
Now I hear you asking, how did a simple cult manage to do that…
Well…
The Finders had connections…
Serious connections…
You see, eventually the FBI had built up quite the case. They had photographic proof showing children engaged in literal Satanic rituals for Christ sakes.
However, out of nowhere the entire case was squashed by…
Yup…you guessed it…
The CIA…
To quote Wikipedia again…
“CIA spokesman David Christian asserted that the charges were a misunderstanding stemming from a company by the name of Future Enterprises Inc. being used to train agents, with one member of the Finders working as a part-time accountant there.”
Yeah, whatever the fuck that means…
Just more garbled Government gibberish like the phrase “Magic Bullet Theory,” and “Israeli Defense Strategy.”
My point is with real life conspiracies and massive organized criminal groups involved in some of the worst crimes imaginable that have been proven time and time again to be not only connected to but protected by the very people that are supposed to be in charge of our countries, setting a positive example for their people as they run our country. And yet, time and time again this is proven to be false. As it seems as though anyone that attempts to change things for the better is quickly done away with.
My point is this…
Flat Earth is nothing but a psyop to distract people from the real conspiracy…
The one that everyone deep down to some degree knows is true…
Whether they believe it only happens in places like Mexico, Eastern Europe, and the Philippines and it’s only underground criminal cartels that are involved…
Or they open their eyes and realize it’s so much bigger then they could possibly ever imagine…
Because the more people understand the scope and the type of people involved in that type of traffic. When they realize the only people that could afford to purchase a trafficked child is someone incredibly wealthy. These aren’t sickos that only lurk around basements. These are well respected politicians, CEOs, royal family members, oil barons, bankers, land owners.
This is how it’s an industry…
It’s always been supported by the super rich elites because they’re the only one with the money, power, and influence to make a crime as heinous as that, even with tons of obvious incriminating evidence just completely vanish in thin air…
A healthy level of scepticism is a good thing. Problem being that flerfers and space deniers aren't sceptical, they're either wilfully ignorant or outright liars. . . or both.
Many are compulsive contrarians. They have the secret knowledge the rest of us are too ignorant to have. You get the same kind of thing in Civil War "war was acksually about" and climate change denialism.
I know one. He's neither, just steadfastly believes everything is a lie except what the half baked flat earth RUclips videos show. IMO it stems from not being able to grasp basic concepts like gravity and two people standing on the north and south pole can both stand upright with everything being completely normal.
Denialism is the word you're looking for.
It's a sad life to spend so much time bashing one of humanity s greatest achievements and symbols of international cooperation 😢
_“There is a cult of ignorance in the United States, and there always has been. The strain of anti-intellectualism has been a constant thread winding its way through our political and cultural life, nurtured by the false notion that democracy means that “my ignorance is just as good as your knowledge.””_ -Isaac Asimov, *NEWSWEEK* Op-ed, 21 January 1980
Once again proving that Flat Earthers only pick those parts where they think they have an explanation for it, everything else gets thrown into the bin
They count on the stupidity and/or apathy of the average flat earther to not check.
I am pretty sure they do not even perceive that. People can obviously be conditioned to set out their brain function when confronted with adverse information.
That’s why cherry-picking is a fallacy, and one of the laws of flerfs.
Soooo, basically their brains...
These are the clips that are circulated. Flat earthers a not known for researching sources.
I think most people arguing “it’s not real” just never observe the entire footage outside of their little bubbles.
its not real and I can do this myself. Everything he just said is totally false from a video editing standpoint. You can see the guy passing the mic to the other hand avoiding the harness cables. Watch footage from a 0G plane and see how hair really reacts in 0G. When she took her hair down she had to shake it violently so it would fluff up. I cant believe people are so gullible but my IQ is 139 so I don't know what its like to be mentally challenged. lol
I think most people who think its real never researched FACTS outside of THEIR BIG Propaganda bubbles.
Speaking of bubbles .... in space. Don't stop believing, mate!
Why are you like that? Serious question. Why the fck are you like that@@mikeknight713
Haven’t seen a comment about this, but why does her hair not move AT ALL, yet the chains on her neck are moving around everywhere?
"Her hair looks fake!!"
But lets ignore her floating necklace😂
Lets ignore the CGI and Gallon of HAir Gel you mean...lololol.....pure foolishness, wake up silly
@@GreatNewsVideo any proove for the cgi? I mean actual proove? Not just "nah ah" and "wake up silly"
But analysing ORIGINAL footage with a cgi program or find the code that was used for it...
Oh and gel in a necklace? 🤣
@@jasmijnariel if you dont have enough common sense and awareness of reality to realize fakery when you see it then no proof will suffice...otherwise YES there are loads of videos that show impossible things happening.
@@GreatNewsVideoI feel sorry for ppl like you. Your willfully ignorant or you just lie to yourself to make yourself feel better. It’s sad
It is impossibe to convince a stupid person, let the trolls be trolls @@jasmijnariel
Fun fact. While watching gravity from 2013 with Sandra Bullock, my mom actually caught a mistake. While on the ISS, Bullocks character, Ryan Stone doesn’t have her hair moving freely, or up like in real footage of female astronauts in space. Something i didn’t notice until she brought it up.
Little mistakes like that would come up a lot if NASA is faking space missions, but we don’t. So i think on that regard, Its pretty safe to assume that NASA is actually doing what they say they are doing
It's one of the minor things that fuel these "it's all fake" claims: that things don't look the way we expect them to look... because our expectation can often be based on "fakes" (well, fiction).
@@Groffili we already have a flurry of Space movies, specifically the BTS in films (ex. 2001,Apollo 13, Gravity, Martian, Life) that basically show that it takes a LONG STRENUOUS amount of time to make things look convincing no matter how high tech it is, especially at the cadence that NASA does…ANY broadcast.
@@Groffili essentially the actual movies that fake space, show that its nigh on impossible to fake what NASA is doing at the rate they are going.
True. You cannot unsee it once you are pointed to the mistake. Thanks for destroying the silver screen magic 😆
@@arctic_haze no problem 😀
Imagine actually being a flat earther tho.. how much time must you have to think that the earth is flat
i personally think that a portion of flatearthers do it to gain views on youtube or such, because there is no one flat earth model and they have to change their own model for each question so that it makes sence. im not saying that there arent people who truely believe in the flat earth theory, but i dont think that these youtubers truely believe in that. (or they are really that stupid and dont realise that their own model does not make sense in the slightest bit)
They are that paranoid, they don't believe NOTHING they are told, even their own eyes or (lack of) common sense .Everything's a conspiracy.
A lot do it for money, it's the same as the 5g Deniers, all the science proves them wrong, but they make big money selling "anti-5g" devices to idiots who are afraid and don't look up or understand how 5g works. So they buy a little plastic card that says "5G-Protection" on it, for £200 and think they are now protected. Same with ads on youtube, patreon subscribers for flat earthers, the documentaries netflix and people pay for etc. etc. The ones leading these conspiracies rarely believe in them it's their followers who believe whilst they string them along for power and money...where have I heard that before, oh right a cult/religion. You'll notice a lot of time the followers never do any science or tests themselves, they just repeat the phrases and terms they have been taught by their leaders. Even though a lot of these things are very easy to test on your own with basic equipment, easier to believe than to question.
@@angrychompski The majority are religious nut jobs
Both of the flat earthers I know personally are unemployed freeloaders (apparently paying taxes is a racket of the jews or something). They have all the time in the world to think about the flatness
9:36 Sandra's neckless isn't behaving. "It must be CGI!"
Nope. It's WEIGHTLESNESS!
After Sandra takes out the hairtie she runs her fingers through her hair with ease. The amount of hairspray needed to keep the hair in that position on earth would not let you run your fingers through your hair like that. Ignorance, pure ignorance.
well, is photoshped, its has to
@@germanhernandezm.7435 and? We know what he said but he didnt say they were FAKE did he?
If I photoshopped a picture of YOU does that mean YOU are fake?
Use your damn brain!
Unfortunately, Dave, there is no "once and for all." So long as these people draw breath, they'll claim it's fake.
Well no there isn’t because the nuts just repeat the same lie pretending nothing happened.
More fun for us.
The comment I came here for.
why so ominous
@@Erurehtiowhy so serious?
And now, watch the goalposts magically shift 20 feet to the right.
@@TacticalWalmartBag
Ever heard of the expression "shifting goalposts"? It's when you can't deny someone's argument, so you just change the end goal of the argument.
@@sc2_Nightmare ah yes that makes sense thanks, no I haven't heard, I agree
speaking of goalposts...if you watch a PAT kick the arc of the ball proves the Earth is....damn it i cant even make a joke lol
😂 gaslighting
Haven’t seen a comment about this, but why does her hair not move AT ALL, yet the chains on her neck are moving around everywhere? 🤡
This reminds me of "It's hard to win an argument with a smart person, but it’s damn near impossible to win an argument with a stupid person." Bill Murray
I mean go outside at night and on certain days you can SEE the ISS. Even if you could put them on some ship and send them to space they would just claim they were "drugged" or somehow otherwise tricked. They use lack of evidence...as evidence...because it's a conspiracy lol.
WHAT CAN YOU ACTUALLY SEE ?
Yes you can see the ISS. No one said its not up there. The videos are clearly fake as hell though. This guy made no sense at all from a video editing stand point he sounds crazy. I could fake this contradicting everything he just said. He is simply wrong about everything and go look at 0G plane footage so you can see how hair reacts in 0 Gravity. People are so gullible.
Yea idk about that one pal. Anything can be faked. Technology has the ability to seem like magic even to regular citizens. Statistically unlikely we aren’t told lies about some things.
Haven’t seen a comment about this, but why does her hair not move AT ALL, yet the chains on her neck are moving around everywhere?🐸☕️
At this point I’m 80% sure flat earthers and flat earth debunkers are working together so they can endlessly make these kind of videos. And we watch them all (on one side at least).
A smart money making scheme honestly
That’s a decent idea for a money making scheme. Have one person run a FE account, and then also an account to debunk the FE account
And yet again, hunting down the original FULL scene, as opposed to only the cherry picked parts the deniers use, DESTROYS their claims.
Who'd 'a think it?! Oh right, everyone thunk it.
Research is a b**ch for flerfs 😂
@@DaveMcKeegan And the hilarious part is, they claim that they "don't blindly believe what they're told", and that they "do their own research". Yea, right. Suuuure you do...
@@ReValveiT_01 They might do their own research, but since they researched how to research on their own, they suck at doing it.
@@DaveMcKeegan 1st law of flerfs, their own citations prove them wrong.
I posted on Level Earth Observer's channel when he cherry-picked Chris Hadfield's "wires". He isn't bright enough to watch the nearly twenty minutes of the original video and see that Hadfield is "sitting" cross-legged for quite a bit. Chris must have abs of granite to be able to hold that position AND dangle from wires without flipping forwards.
Then there's also the minor inconvenience of Tom playing with the Makita drill and Hadfield floating the Nikon about. But the best part is how obvious Hadfield's watch is floating around completely without gravity's influence.
But hey, no one said they're logical.
I feel like a lot of people who make excuses for it being fake don't actually think them through, they just kick the can down the road. I honestly don't know what people get out of saying these things are fake
Some people are just contrarians. Anything to be the special person who figures out the "sheep" don't. Attention seeking is part of it. Others are just plain idiots. In either case, once you have argued yourself into a corner you just become defensive and are unable to give up on the idea because you'd look extremely foolish.
@@timolynch149 They love calling other people sheep while going about actually acting like one. They often see a claim by one of their kind then all just copy-paste it without even considering or looking at it.
It's called misinformation for a RUclips channel 😢 do you think anyone in this day and age actually thinks the known spherical earth is not what we see true reality 🤔 nooo obviously.
They MUST claim that those are fake to protect their all important narrative. They CAN'T accept the reality of space. Well, they can accept reality.
Flerfs, and conspiratards in general, are dump people who want very badly to be the smart kids but don't have the will or the means to pull it off. The only method left to them is to "see the big coverup that nobody else does" which is perfect for them because anything they can't understand is potentially evidence in their favor. In the event they don't find anything that they can twist into agreeing with their conclusions, the mere lack of evidence is proof of the coverup, which in turn proves their theories.
I love how conspiracy theorists always share clips at the lowest quality possible in order to mask any details that might, ya know, totally blow up their theories. Watched two of your videos so far. Both were great. Definitely subscribed. Partly because of the content but mostly because of your dog 😉
Oh so you are calling NASA conspiracy theorists then since they lost the original footage?
@@redditsucksyo You can literally find a link to a 720p version of the original broadcast in this video’s description… the clip I always see get passed around certainly isn’t 720p. It’s always just fuzzy enough to cast doubt. Seems like a really targeted coincidence….
Also, I’m not just talking about this video. I’m talking about the dishonest way all of these “NASA LIES” videos get passed around. Like the famous “chromakey” video. They say it shows NASA using a green screen. The evidence? A video of an astronaut using a blue screen with a white grid on it (for measuring motion) can be seen on a screen in the background. That video was filmed for and disseminated to the public, yet people pass it around like it’s something that wasn’t meant to be seen… what a joke. Wasn’t meant to be seen? It’s on RUclips right now…
@@redditsucksyo He never said that and you know it. Why are all of you flat earthers so dishonest?
NASA: *experiences one slight glitch in a video feed spanning 254 miles in to space aboard a space station moving at nearly 18,000mph...
36 year old man with a net worth of $17,000, driving a 2000 Cavalier, living in a studio apartment in a dump: "Hah! Clearly they are faking it!"
And cell phones drop signal in the country lol. These people are not so smart are they?
Having more money than someone doesn't mean you are authentic and correct. I would trust the low wage networth $17,000 ORDINARY NORMAL PERSON over the corrupt government funded NASA Freemason a44holes anyday. I owned a Chevy Cavalier, beautiful car, get off your high horse.
Why are the flat Earthers willing to accept zero G in a plane, but then deny that gravity exists?
Because they have zero physics knowledge. Not even enough to do a decent reality debunking.
Because all they ever consider is what they need for the thing they are trying to justify at the current moment. They give no thought to the implications for another claim.
Most conspiracy nuts are that way, like saying the moon footage is slow motion then also claiming seeing wires often talking about clips moments apart.
@@Isolder74 Another example is flerfs who claim we do not see over the horizon because we can only see objects closer than a few miles, forgetting that they also claim sun and moon are thousands of miles above us.
Every FE argument exists in its own separate universe, where it is unaffected by the logic or physics that govern any of the others.
Now we're going to have them calling them Zero Relative density disequilibrium flights 🤦🏻♂️
After watching your first video I was really surprised anyone saw this clip and thought, yep it's fake. Now having seen more of the original video it's clear they didn't think that because nobody could possibly arrive at that conclusion and that clip was selected in bad faith. Again, these science deniers have no honor or class
@@Grauenwolf Yes. Starting with a conclusion and desperately hunting to find something to support that conclusion.
@@Grauenwolf Exactly, pretty much the way these kind of conspiracy theories go is that the purveyors assert that because there's some individual detail in a far larger whole which is "wrong", or appears to be "wrong", they have ostensibly proven something even if everything else fits the official theory and the said detail being "wrong" can be explained in more mundane ways (such as the claimant being mistaken or too inexperienced).
Look at how quickly TC accepts any and all flat proofs offered him without question but picks through every detail of anything related to the globe.
@@Isolder74 That's called Double Standard Fallacy.
@@Kualinar Actually no: it's confirmation bias. You keep answers/explanations that already conforms to your viewpoint.
Double standard is when you hold different people/groups to different standards for the same premise or actions.
Alright sweet now doing one on the people appearing out of nowhere
Not only people. Also objects appearing out of nowhere. Lot of ISS clips clearly identified as cgi and forgery. Maybe not all but a lot.
i love your dog dude, as soon as you start your outro, he realizes, gets excited it and raises his paws, cute afff
It'll never be enough to overcome the power of "nuh uh". But the point isn't to convince those who can't be convinced. It's to show just how weak their claims are to those who might otherwise fall for them. And you've done a fantastic job of that. Clear and thorough, as usual.
Another excellent video from Rusty and his sidekick.
“the power of ‘nuh-uh’”… classic 😂👌🏾
*A piece of information with research done to every last details and logical explanation over physical phenomenon
"Nuh uh!"
Nasa laundering billions
I've come to the conclusion that nobody actually believes the earth is flat. They just have a disorder that direct injects dopamine into their bloodstream when they lie.
It's always funny watching people trying to claim every single one of thsee clips are fake. On the one hand they go in to such detail that they've got jewelry on its own harness and a ridiculous amount of editing time in post with huge teams of people, then on the other hand they have to miss and leave in "obvious" signs of fakery.
Standard flerf thing I guess, picking and choosing to try and have things both ways.
It’s Schrödinger’s Flerf. NASA are both incredibly clever and unbelievably sloppy at exactly the same time.
The conspiracy can only be as smart as the idiot uncovering it.
Globtards need to understand the government/military have weapons,technology heck even spacecrafts we don’t know about the general population after all it was the fbi who went into nikola Tesla office and took everything so they know shit we don’t and ppl have a hard time believing or accepting this cause they are owned by the government mentally and physically
What you mean..?
people did not land in moon?
Neil armstrong was fake?
Seriously, Hollywood needs to start using NASA green screens. They’re so good it looks like they’re not even being used. Seamless effects! 🤔
lol Im so good I can make it look like its not being used. I dont have a nasa budget either lmao
@@mikeknight713No doubt. What’s your channel where you show off your amazing work? With full motion and interacting with objects in the digital background in real time?
@@mikeknight713 Uh, you’re welcome for the 285th view? I guess? But seriously, what channel do you put this seamless green screen work on? Because there was exactly one decent shot in that whole thing (the bullet to the head).
The static shots in the house aren’t exactly hard to get, though the lighting was fine. I can’t say the same thing about the green screen shots. They were definitely no-budget and really obvious.
Spend less time making excuses for looney theories and more time on your day job…because cinematography isn’t your forte.
"Obviously Hollywood is part of the conspiracy and intentionally produces inferior green screen effects to make NASA more credible" - flerfer probably
I've been a hair stylist over 20 years and you absolutely can make hair stand up like that very easily & be able to put your fingers through it you dont have to put so much hairspray that its crunchy at all you use a matt finish past & you you use the hair dryer about 1ft or so and blow the finishing hairspray at same time it will do that effect no problem no need to be "drowned in hairspray" the straight strands on the sides are definitely not free flowing &the way she put her fingers multiple times in it trying to separate it w/ minimal separation absolutely shows there's product in it 100% SIR YOUR DEBUNK HAS BEEN DEBUNKED!
If you were a hair stylist, you'd know that hair has a natural rigidity. Why do you hoaxers feel the need to lie about everything?
(Well, silly question, it is of course because you don't have a single argument in your favor.)
Do you have a demonstration to show it can replicate it?
Without such you might as well claim you can pee diamonds
And regardless the hair wasn't the whole debunk - there is still the issues of the floating necklace & microphone, the prolonged floating of 4 people in close proximity and the drastically changing lighting
@@DaveMcKeegan How is it possible that the astronaut reaches into the air and suddenly holds a stuffed toy in her hand? Can the good woman do magic or is that grennscrene?
@@DaveMcKeegan Not sure how much actual education you have in cosmetology but as a well educated cosmetologist its very easy to see how the hair is done to create that look
pissing diamonds is a idiotic reference you dont have to be an Urologist to know thats impossible Not having any education in cosmetology and claiming that a stylist couldn't creat hair to look & act like that is in no manner similar aspects
@@bigdeal6336 I don't really have any, which is why I asked if we could see a demonstration
Just claiming you're knowledgeable in the subject and that it's easily possible doesn't mean it's true which is why I'd be interested in seeing it actually done
Respectfully; Anybody who thinks the world is flat really needs to get some professional help.
Or a REAL job...as unlikely as that sounds.
but professionals are part of the ominous cabal of misinforming organization perpetuated by the evil NASA so they won't ever seek that.
The Royal College of Psychiatrists just collectively shivered ...
Like all of you who believe the governments arent run by a satanic cult. Right kiddo
Wake up and smell the free masons.
i bet a few dubay followers are angry
You can't prove a flat earther wrong. They'll simply move the goal postvand act as if they never made the disproven claims
Most of them don't even read what you type.
You can't prove _to_ a flat earther _that they are_ wrong. It's about them, not about the facts.
@@ShizukuSeiji Or see the videos where they comment
You can prove them wrong, but it doesn't mean they have the attention span to listen or remember your debunking. Low IQ people simply don't have much attention span. The moment it gets a little bit complicated is the moment their mind drifts off. That's why flerfs immediately follow up with a new question after getting an answer. And at some point they are gonna start from the beginning and ask the 1st question again.
You can literally send them to space and they would still make excuses.
I like how you just un-picked their cherries by pulling out the entire broadcast
This debunking is absolute bunk.
You're very much welcome to explain why.
Having worked with green screen editing and animation, I can say that it is extremely difficult to get the shadows falling on a green screen to line up with a background image. Especially like the irregular parts that jut out in the background behind the astronauts. One would have to construct a 3D model that matches the background structure to enable the green screen shadows to conform on it. It certainly could not be done in real time for a live stream.
You reckon you have the same green screen technology as NASA?
@@keithmc8654 🤦♂
@@keithmc8654 Yes.
@@Isaac_Flat_Earth Biggest cult ever
If earth is flying at 800,000 kmph, let's say India is flying upwards, then America would be flying downwards, because it's opposite, so after 12 hours India flies downwards and America flies upwards, right? Meantime other countries fly sideways.
This is the event that you claim that happens everyday. So as you can see how silly and laughable is this! Right?
So sad, billions of people believed on flying ball earth so deep in their every cell, since their childhood, now this sudden truth bothers them deeply, because every brain cell is filled with ball earth, it's the most heart breaking for globers.
Flerf: _Cherry picks video he thinks has a gotcha and demands explanation._
Glerf: _Addresses flerf's points, soundly debunking them._
Flerf: YoU cHeRy PicKeD tHat VideO! WaTcH tHe WhOLe tHinG!
Flerf: Choosing whichever parts of physics they don't like to ignore.
Also Flerf: No, you cherry picking the video.
Feels like flerfs don't have the attention span to pay attention to the debunking and remember it. They gonna ask 15 other questions and then ask this one again.
If there was a cable, wouldn't his leg get tangled with it during the back flip?
It’s funny to me that space deniers don’t believe that it’s possible to be in space, but acknowledge zero g’s in a plane is possible. The ironic part about being in orbit around the earth, is that that’s exactly what the plane trick is. The only difference is that the zero g’s in a plane has a time limit. All an orbit is, is an object constantly falling towards the earth, but because it’s traveling sideways at such a high speed, it’s always missing the earth. So of course you experience zero g’s in orbit. It’s the plane trick on a more permanent scale. You’re always falling so you always experience this weightlessness.
Flat earthers decided they were right
While roundearthers proved we are correct
Crazy part is how the proof just gets ignored 😂
I don't think the earth is flat but I do know for a fact all nations are run by the free mason cult meaning that they are lying to us. Welcome to the world run by the pyramids eye
@@xXJerry202Xxabsolutely gets ignored when it clearly showed he grabbed wires😂😂😂
You mean globetards?
Haven’t seen a comment about this, but why does her hair not move AT ALL, yet the chains on her neck are moving around everywhere?🐸☕️
The effort it takes to create/manipulate this kind of footage is almost more difficult than actually going to space
When it comes to the moon landing footage, from a technial standpoint it was easier to send people to the moon than to film something that looked the way it did.
@@RocketboyX Sure it was rocket boy sure it was . Unfortunately all the telimentry data was trashed so hard to back it with numbers and facts .
@@creamwobbly yeah and launching from moon and docking with tiny module was child’s play.
@@rustybeltrebel6213 Any proof ?
@@pierreboissonneault Proof of what ?
I love how you stay respectful at all times while debunking this. This is exactly the style of debunking we need, so people who are in doubt stay with you and don't be pushed away by feeling ridiculed. Thank you so much
I agree with you. This is the style of debunking we need but at the same time things don't always need to be debunked. If it's not hurting anybody then sometimes you just have to let people believe what they wanna believe. Left brain logic doesn't need to be brought into every situation in life
Thank you my friend its called live and let live. Wolves are not bothered by the opinions of sheep. Which is why I don't try to convert anyone, I don't need others confirmation to back up my beliefs. I form them based on my own experiences and not the opinions of strangers.
I work with a Chroma screen every day as part of my job. A green screen would be blatantly obvious.
But they could use Rear Projection (like they did for the moon landing) or disney sodium vapor
@@MarquisDeSang I cannot tell if you're being serious or not, and that scares me...
@@fafnir242 The earth is flat, join me, we will jump from the edge.
FE: They must have faked it with a plane that can go fast and free fall longer.
GE: Yes.
Wait, no, wait that's technically true
I mean, even then it would also have to fly at _extremely_ high altitude, like over 200 miles. Oh, wait…
They faked it with a plane that goes so fast that it is freefalling around the Earth... Oh dear, that would require a globe... 🤣🤣🤣
Underrated comment of the year. Bravo :D
Yes but it goes in circles
Holy! You utterly destroyed any and all notions this video is faked and not in orbit around the earth. One of the best most thorough savage beat downs I’ve ever witnessed!!
Agreed.
Agreed!
Indeed.
Ah yes when im in a cgi green screen my jewelry and hair are being manipulated by zero g gravity
Okay how do you explain the gravity pockets
It was a green screen that was filmed in a water tank in a zerogee plane, obviously.
They were reptilians so ofc it's possible for them to nreath under water, obviously.
😁👍😃
Maybe the zero G plane was on a harness and that's how they avoided it crashing into the floor 😁
@@DaveMcKeegan Nah, they just flew it at 17500mph at an altitude of around 250 miles above sea level, that way they can get those long, continuous shots.
@@joeschmo3844 wait a minute.. sounds familiar
The fact this stuff needs to be explained to people makes me weep for common sense.
Its okay, I did the maths. I seriously doubt there are more than a million flerfs on the planet, most of those in the USA's bible belt of course. Not a single one in the southern hemisphere. Not one with a half-decent education. With 8 billion humans on the planet flerfs make up only 0.0125% so we're totally fine; "common" sense is good to go, there's just a stupidly small percentage of uncommon sense out there and we can safely ignore it.
The wires dont get tangled with the mic cable because he switches the mic from one hand to another mid roll
THANK YOU! finally someone with a brain lol
@@mikeknight713 You serious? What about the cable at 9:48 what do you think there. It's wild to me that you watch this entire video and you're still convinced its fake because you think that one tiny element could make sense with your theory. Wild!
If I am ever graced with the opportunity to visit and inhabit the ISS, I would like to see if I could take with me the LEGO Ideas ISS set to assemble on a live stream.
Then I could ask Flerfers how would that footage be fake when there are 864 LEGO pieces floating about in whatever trajectory they were moving upon opening the bags that contained them.
Of course the real entertainment value would be in seeing me chase after these pieces in a Zero G environment.
Send a message to Elon Musk. Sounds like a pretty cool idea. Never hurts to ask. I'd personally donate to fund even the most staunch FE to send up in space and someone film his face as he's seeing our beautiful planet.
I'd donate to send you up with your idea even. I'm all for showing proof and I know millions would also support. This has to stop its screwing up the future for our Grandkids.
@@TheUnderCoverMother2020 I don't have an X account, so that might be tough lol
But that would be entertaining as well.
@@TheUnderCoverMother2020 That would be quite the donation. The funny thing is, LEGO has once used a high atmosphere balloon and broadcasted the entire journey of a bunch of Classic Space Minifigs being sent to near space before eventually landing to the Earth. RUclips doesn't like links, but I think it's somewhere on LEGO's official RUclips channel. Though FE's will likely just claim its CGI.
People are sometimes critically stupid
And in the case of flat earthers...they're stupid all the time
Yes, we all are! I used to believe in an almighty and invisible god that loves me until I was 10 and started wondering if some entity like that actually exists. When I was 19 I believed that there was strong evidence that aliens had visited Earth in the past. Who knows which of the beliefs that I hold today are equally nonsensical? I am 64 now and somewhere along the way I got degrees in chemistry and in physics and I have often been "accused" of having a scientific mindset. (I take that as a compliment even when I know the person stating it didn't mean it that way! 😜) It's really hard to know which of one's beliefs are utter nonsense and which aren't! Hopefully I have learned to be way more skeptical as I grew older but that doesn't completely protect me from holding nonsensical beliefs and that's true for all humans! At least I know that I can still give up strongly held beliefs even after multiple decades because I did just that about half a year ago. Still, I have no idea what nonsense remains in my little grey cells!
@@ruschein see how arsenal got 36 likes but you got 0? Its because we aren’t talking about religion and you are just begging for attention
@@ruschein also nobody asked lmao
@@a_coloradan8689 I am neither begging for attention nor do I care how many likes I get! And yes, religion is the greatest example for people believing in unsubstantiated nonsense and therefore pertinent in this discussion!
If I may weigh in: all those special effects deniers are invoking require so many re-takes, and so much post-production work to make it even remotely believable. Those conferences were held live, with questions from the audience. There is NO image technology that allows any of that. Not even close.
The deniers would say it wasn't live, I think.
Well, that would just be a baseless claim without evidence, so…
They just claim that NASA has secret technology which makes such image manipulation possible. :D
(And at the same time, they claim that NASA does _not_ have the technology for spacefligt. :D )
You are wrong there are even videos of it and you can add objects in real-time eveb interacting with them. Bet ya everything in my savings account. But you go ahead and keep thinking you know what you are talkin about buddy!
It's actually genuinely incredible that the people that claim it's green screens, or wires, or what-have-you clearly have no idea how any of those things work and seem to be ignorant to even how things behave here on earth in regards to gravity, drag and even just being in water.
Yep, that is the funniest part of flerfers and moon hoaxers coming up with comparisons and technical details: they just reveal that they have no clue about those either.
WHATS SO INCREDIBLE ABOUT ORDINARY PEOPLE COMMENTING ON THINGS THERE NOT EXPERT ON?
One of the greatest pieces of evidence is you can go out and see the ISS. Ive seen it fly over a dozen times. It really puts onto perspective how awesome humanity really is. We can do this shit, how awesome!
I don't get why people try to disprove space travel. Do people not like the idea that we can do great things, that we can challenge nature and do things that are far beyond the wildest dreams of our ancestors?
The idea! You said it yourself...its nothing more than an idea...a fantastical lie. They programmesd you with science fiction (star wars etc). You have an emotional connection to the lie that is outer space...but what it comes down to is that you feel like you don't have
the strength inside you to accept that you're living a lie
And with regards to you seeing the I.S.S...you have seen something travel across the sky that you've been told is a spaceship....one that is around 100 miles above you and is not much different in size to a jumbo jet.....could u see a jumbo jet if it were at the same height as the supposed I.S.S?
The answer is no....ALSO there are many videos showing the supposed I.S.S fading in and out in the sky...as if it it is nothing more than some kind of holographic projection
Holographic Projections exist and can be run quite easy with current technology. Believing that the ISS exists by just trusting your eyes is no different that it doesn't exist by just listening to "flat earth conspiracists". The issue here is that you cannot prove it for yourself here on earth. aka take a flight and actually venture into the ISS
Occam‘s razor: exists
Flerfs: I pretend I didn’t see that
5:30 his arm and leg would also collide with the "wire" that was "grabbed". So either the wire somehow passed through his arm and leg, or the wire became disconnected during the roll and instantly reconnected (somehow) in time to be grabbed.
Absolutely. That is the first thing I noticed with this supposedly " Fake " video. His arms and legs must also be CGI.
@@galaxyhunter1978 These astronauts must be fully CGI! In fact, they must be robots invented by NASA for the sake of faking these images!
Side note on "it looks like the other fingers are grabbing something": Yes, the whole hand acts together. The main grabbing muscle, flexor digitorum profundus, connects to all the fingers. Which finger would catch a fold wasn't a great concern, and moving them separately is complicated.
The view from that window is frightening!! But beautiful at the same time
Does anybody know were to find the full video of this interview???
He showed the title of it in the video.
STS-135 Flight Day 7 Interviews, Part 2
ruclips.net/video/iV-X0NcG8Lc/видео.htmlsi=ZsYuwo41_tm2vsxR
I personally believe that if a flat earther got invited to go into space and to the Station to see for them selves that the earth is a globe, they would come back and still claim it was fake.
Yup, they'd say they'd been drugged and shown fake movies on a screen.
Yup, absolutely.
William Shatner went to the supposed edge of space and he said all he saw was the deepest darkness he's ever seen and nothing but death above us and and that earth shall always be our only home and none of you want to hear that.
@@tommosher8271 and despite all the poetry, earth is still sphere shaped haha
@@tommosher8271 Why does William Shatner's opinion matter?
If only flerfers put this much mental energy into productive things.
yeah, like a real map or pictures/images showing a wide flat plain spreading off into the distance showing the lights at night of other cities far away .....
I have this feeling that flerfs are not productive people, no matter what they do with their time.
They write some pretty entertaining songs, and make amusing desk knick-knacks.
@@bunnykillerthese kind of things have been shown many times, but you will never hear of it on these channels, I have seen footage if mountain ranges from over 200 miles away which not even the most extreme/convenient amount of refraction would allow to see that far
@@Ellegedly Incorrect. Flat earthers have never been able to put forth an actual functioning map or any of the other things bunny mentioned. All observations line up with a globe expectation. If you think otherwise then by all means provide the picture along with all the necessary data to put it to the test. If you are going to try pic de Finestrelles to pic Gaspard in the alps well that fits the globe just fine as the photographer himself said he tried many different times and got the perfect moment relying upon refraction in order to see it. Furthermore the taller mountain being observed is below the level of the photographer which confirms the curvature of the earth as on a flat earth the other mountain would still be above the level of the photographer.
I thought earth is for real flat, but after watching your videos i can sleep well tonight knowing earth is not flat.
You're scared of reality...you need to be told a a fairytale so that you can sleep..you said it yourself. I bet you haven't even watched any decent F.E videos I.E 200 proofs
people dont understand, they film this with markers tiem in a flying studio within antigravity plane.. they do several antigravity loops, that is when they do that tumbles
So you have never seen actual footage of parabolic flight to compare this to? Shouldn't that be the minimal research before writing such nonsense?
I have definite proof that your videos are shot under water. Your "dog" is obviously a seal in disguise 😜
Genetically engineered gills. 🤫
Are you sure it's not a dogfish?
@@kevinskinner4986 Only Hans can get to the bottom of this pantomime! 🙃
@@arctic_haze Would that be Hans Hass, who with his wife Lotte pioneered under water film making and documentaries in the 1950s? Or would that be Hans Wormhat, the all round nutter who believes that just about every animal on the planet is fake?
@@thearmouredpenguin7148 In the flat earth, there is only one Hans. The one who claims that koalas are disaster actors. Yes, Wormhat.
I love all the "it has to be fake because [thing that would be impossible on Earth]" claims 😂
I can’t see why people think it’s fake, I just love watching you debunk videos, it’s actually hilarious
You'd think a multi billion dollar company spanning the globe would have enough money/authority to order a re-take of the shot where everyone's obviously messing with the wires.
Also, spinning around and wires don't go well together. 8:34 Try doing that with wires.
10:33 Obviously "Highrish" doesn't know how a green screen works. It's not for making things overlapping the actors look like something it's not, it's to make the background look like something it's not.
Also, the fact that Christopher drifts to the left is another reason why he's obviously not on cables.
Yes, if he was on cables he would swing in a gentle arc.
people who claim they are in harnesses have never spent time in a harness, not only would what you say in the video be true but spending that much time in a harness without taking weight off of it can lead to toxic shock
Her hair behaves as a rigid object attached to her head. It's like a mohawk, not like real loose hair.
And what happens to a mohawk when putting on a hat?
No, it just looks like bushy long hair.
Have you ever seen a person under water?
No it doesn't?
Did you even see the part of the video where she runs her fingers through her hair? Did you even watch the video before jumping to conclusions and going "nuh uh" like a total buffoon
This video is a great example of Occam's Razor, something I'm sure Flat Earthers understand, but wrongfully apply all the time.
OMG!!! You could actually bring some these people on the ISS and they still wouldn't believe it.
Even as they died in agony after “stepping outside” they’d still be thinking “Nah, this hard vacuum that’s killing me isn’t real.”
@@joeschmo3844 They probably would think that someone put the ISS inside a vacuum chamber just to fool them. And after the flerf died, others would think that person was killed to protect the secret.
Nasa never share raw footage
Calm , Rational well reasoned - debunking done pretty well perfectly
😂😂😂😂 which part did tye debunking more like it just showed actual proof of wires 😂😂 dufus tf
Liars liars pants on wires.
How do the astronauts move their arms through the wires? LOL You guys really are stupid.
Use your eyes, neanderthal.
Does no one remember the fact you can fly a plane in a sky and create zero gravity by flying in a specific pattern? You don't have to be in space to float.... Great video btw, you've convinced me he was grabbing his pocket.
Did you bother to look up for how long that microgravity would work and what happens when the are at the lowest point? Don't answer - it is clear that you didn't. Because people like you never bother to be skeptical towards their own brain farts. Because if you were honest, you would admit that those are all this is about: you brilliance to understand these things without studying them.
Sadly, with flatards and reality deniers, there's no such thing as 'once and for all'
As the old saying goes, 'You can't teach stupid" 🙄
You can't cure stupid. Being as stupid as a flatard is a disease.
I think we're all stupid, it's just a matter of degree!
@Johannes Ruscheinski
Ignorant, yes, foolish too, but stupid in the science denying flatardian sense is something of a special kind.
A degree is something no flatards will ever have. 😉
@@Zubareffstream111 Well, just look at the millions that believe that there is no climate change caused by humans even though there is near universal consensus in the scientific community or the all the nuts that believe in various conspiracies relating to vaccinations or the millions that believe that Trump's re-election was stolen etc., etc.
Also, don't get me started on religious beliefs! We humans love to believe things that make us feel good, whether it's that we're in on something that others aren't or that we're special etc.
@@Zubareffstream111 Wilfully ignorant people are the worst.
It’s totally obvious and clear that the microphone cord is connected to a harness to give the appearance it’s in outer space, and each individual one of her hairs is connected to a harness to give the appearance they’re in outer space, in fact this comment currently is connected to a harness to give the appearance it’s in outer space 😳
I don't believe you.
So, when she flips upside down, 1st time, her necklace falls DOWN quickly... then, where her hair is up every where else, it keeps that odd "upness" while she's also upside down... it doesn't shift at all...
Things shift when something makes them shift. They don't do that on their own.
Holyyy fuck. You seriously watched allll of this video, where he explains in perfect detail every little possible thing that makes it IMPOSSIBLE that this video is fake, and you still ask a question like that? Oh my GOD you are dense.
I agree it’s bizarre
Dear Rusty’s human, I want to keep Rusty. Yours truly, not Rusty’s human
I watch your "flat earth" video with the same humor of knowing I should not drive by a road way accident, and slow down to view the carnage. You do a great job of countering all of the conspiracy theories of "...it was on a sound stage, with green screen...". Well done Dave.
Dave, nobody never mentions the obvious effect of gravity on faces, or lack thereof in ISS shots. All faces in zero G look puffed up because the gravity is not pulling it down or any other direction and their faces are unchanged whichever way they are positioned. Is this a bit too much of a mental arithmetics for the flerfs?
Exactly. They all look like they’re doing handstands.
Exactly. Same way your face hangs differently when you're upside down (here on the ground I mean).
@@brianparr988 Yes. If you take photos of your face whilst on the ground, the right way up, upside down and on each side and then flip them all right side up, you can appreciate just how much gravity affects or faces. That doesn’t happen in zero g and the face looks equally distorted which ever way they are pointing and that is the best evidence for absence of gravity in those shots. Zero G plane mimics that to an extent but its too short and inconsistent and very expensive I must add. Its awesome that Dave included shots of Apollo 13 shooting scenes in Zero G plane - one wonders why would they do that if they can just fake it, as they claim everything in space is faked. Why paying so much money if they can just use studio and strings 🤔
@@kruger78 Strong point Even Hollywood need real, actuall zero G (or near as) for the movie to be as realistic as possible. Be interesting to hear a flerf's take on this point. A very long pause, occasional distant bell, and some kind of tumbleweed scenario comes to mind.
Problems on these "debunkings" is that there are too many what to debunk overall. The hair is the biggest problem, those don't float on these footages, those are pointing straight up, like involving with the gravity. Like, when you are in the water, those are floating AROUND, those are on your face, back, side, every where. Those are not pointing up all the time. There are air in the "space station" and air conditioning. Yet, those hairs are stuck upwards.
Right. If she was moving around, her hair should move around in the direction too regardless of gravity. The definition of inertia is the tendency of objects in motion to stay in motion, and objects at rest to stay at rest, unless a force causes its speed or direction to change. Like we saw in the moon videos with the flag moving due to inertia, her hair should have moved even though there* was air in the room.
I can't believe that this still has to be explained to adults.
MANY "adults" are still emotional adolescents...
It would actually be really interesting to see someone try to recreate this clip on earth using wires and green screen, just to see how different it would end up looking. Space scenes in films and tv can be somewhat convincing, but there's always something that gives away that it's fake.
Let's get @Corridor on it!
@@RikardPeterson yes! It could be the next in their conspiracy debunking series.
If I can get 50-60 million a day for the 50 years I'll have it no problem
That reminds me of the moon hoax nuts who think that Kubrick faked the moon landings. He took a couple of years to photograph 2001: A Space Odyssey. In which has a few scenes on the moon. All of which totally ignore 1/6th gravity. They always just walk normally, as if on Earth. Unlike Apollo, where the leave the surface with both feet on almost every fast step.
@@Ellegedly For that much money I could build a rocket and film it for real!
Honestly surprises me the fact that flat earthers cry that you're cherry picking when the video itself debunks their own claims. They literally cherry picked the video for points to throw at you when there are blatant inconsistencies when you look at the video as a whole. They've seen their proof and elected to ignore it.
When he says when we view a higher quality version of the footage the guys shirt is obviously tugged by something which is why he drifts to the side in the 1st place. Smh lol
Great review. And mentioning that it is just a cut of a much longer, continuous video is a killer. That microphone cord, during rolls and putting over Doug's head is pretty tough to explain as well. It's easy for someone to say 'green screen', but only by those that haven't actually done it. I've learned so much by watching your channel, and you always have a calm, informative approach. Keep it up.
Ask any hairdresser. Lots of hair spray (or gel) can make your hair stick up, but rigidly, like punk mohawks. Not *flow* upwards like that. There's at least one video showing a lady astronaut washing her hair in space, wet hair sticking up. Why that video is never mentioned by flatearthers? 😏
Well LEO has but mostly to complain that it’s fake because the water would damage systems so it can’t be in space ‘cause pantomime. He even implies that to be real NASA would insist they shave their heads and never bathe/wash their hair.
Not that he ever says anything of substance as his main argument is space is fake so fake because I say so(while saying big words he clearly doesn’t understand).
Exactly, hair that's been sprayed/gelled doesn't stand straight up after removing a hair tie. No matter how much you shake your head, it will not stand straight up. They can't even do a simple experiment before making such a S+uPlD claim.
Because it destroys their claims.
Just watch how she runs her fingers through her hair after taking the bowtie off, impossible with all that hairspray the flerfs claim.
Sandra's necklace is about the most obvious thing in shot which indicates that this is happening in zero G.
It's also a, fairly common, piece of jewelry which would be hugely expensive to fake using CGI.
I had a feeling that this tired clip was cherry picked, but man, I've seen less cherries picked for a pie eating contest.
Thanks for finding the extended clip that flerfers dare not talk about.
How long before Slappys sock puppets turn up and start blathering about triangles instead?
I hate it when they go off on _tangents_ about it being impossible to measure angles from curved adjacents. It makes it obvious that when their math classes started discussing math using letters instead of numbers their brains shutdown.
IT WOULD LITERALLY BE HARDER TO FAKE THIS, THAN TO DO IT FOR REAL.
So you're saying we should film the fake moon landing... on the moon?!
An excellently placed Mitchell and Webb reference? Why I think so!❤
@@Hawk_of_Battlebut then it wouldn't be fake
@@kittyn5222 that's the point we've been trying to make for years.
Globtards need to understand the government/military have weapons,technology heck even spacecrafts we don’t know about the general population after all it was the fbi who went into nikola Tesla office and took everything so they know shit we don’t and ppl have a hard time believing or accepting this cause they are owned by the government mentally and physically
Well done, sir.
You delve into responses to hopefully "...show hopefully once and for all..." (1:15) that the ISS vids are not fake.
They're not fake, of course. My compliments on your glittering display of optimism in when attempting to convince the FE folks of _anything_ .
In every shot of Dave, he has more dog hairs on his shirt. Must be CGI!
I’d love to imagine that it is “once and for all”,but I haven’t got high hopes. Let them drown in their misunderstandings and let’s move on.
By the way,this video is exceptionally well done 👍
To be fair, I do appreciate these people arguing.
I've learned so much about space, zero-gravity, photography, Globe theory from watching these videos.
Always pretty informative and never truly disrespectful.
On the other hand....
I've never watched flat-earther content. Who knows, they're views might also be informative, and one always needs to see a story rom both sides, right?
Guess I'm cursed to remain uninformed for the rest of my life
@@eugenebruyns4999 as someone who has seen flerf content you aren't missing much. Half of them think that screaming is good argumentation and not a single one even knows what the modern theory of our solar system even claims.
@@eugenebruyns4999 Believe me you really aren't missing much.
@@eugenebruyns4999 That's because there is NO substance to ANY of their fanciful claims. Their only game is "prove the globe", and they NEVER provide evidence one for their fantasy.
"They faked it by (insert insanely complicated set of explanations that require a stupid amount of effort just to perpetrate a hoax that has no plausible reason to bother perpetrating)."
Really what about the BILLIONS NASA spends every year? It's more than the annual profits of the music, movie/tv, & gaming industries COMBINED...multiple times more. That's nothing?
An all we get is CGI composites and make believe stories in return. The cog dis is real hope you can overcome! Blessings.
If someone was using a green screen for this, they would not have let Sandra take her hair out of that bun. Anyone who has actually worked with green screen knows what a nightmare long, loose hair can be to try to key out in post. It can be done, but it's incredibly difficult and you really need to have a near perfect lighting setup on set to make it look good (which the lighting in this clip is clearly not conducive for high-quality green screen).
Indeed - it is one of the many "why would they bother with that if it could be avoided?" moments. Just like when they move through the whole station without an edit - possible to fake but they could produce hours worth of material when avoiding that. Gravity is just over 90 minutes for a reason.
"I reject your reality and substitude my own" -- All those crew members are CGI too, so no harnesses needed... 🤪
This is a joke right?
@@fifofafo3999 offcourse 😂
mfw don't have cute 3d CGI waifu 😮💨
@@volkerdechow8562 oh my god thank you for not r/woooshing me
10:32 Addressing the floating necklace with "green screen" is comically daft because the necklace isn't in front of the background. Its in front of her neck and clothes.
Do these people think they used a green neck?
If the necklace was a CG construction not only would it need to be painstakingly blended with her body frame by frame for the entire length of the 20 minute shot but so would its shadows. Any video effects artist asked to do this would tell you to piss off because it would be a monumental (and virtually impossible) task to do convincingly.
For some reason I did the math. If the video is shot at 24 frames per second, it means there are 1440 frames in 1 minute and that would 28800 frames for 20 minutes.
Let us say it takes 1 minute to edit 1 frame (Nase gfx editors are wizards), it would take 480 hours to edit it. That's 20 days of non-stop editing (24u / day). And that's just for the necklace.
@@elBartoDR and it would take far more than a minute to mask the necklace in one frame.....not even counting the shadows.
The key with Flat Earth folks is that they have FAITH. Thus they can explain away any facts and logic you present.
Faith? Like Flerfs are a 'Religion' ... or dare I say ... 'Cult' 😂😂😂
@@TheMvoelker1 Yes, like a religion (FE RUclips are their holy scriptures), but no to the cult. There's no leader, just some FE folks are more prominent than others.
Debunking the BS is always a good thing. There is always a great potential to keep someone on the brink from falling for the foolishness. There is seldom a chance to reach a true believer who can simply cry 'fake!' at any evidence presented.
Never underestimate the power of stupid.
He goes all those wire cables would be carnage! You’re “defeating” a “ ridiculous” concept with an equally ridiculous idea 😭 yeah that’s why they can’t fake their videos because it would be too hard with all the wires
Big applause to you Dave. You're quickly becoming one of the best out there at showing the flerfs how deluded they are. Keep up the good work.
Much appreciated 😊
Especially for stuff like this. You know how to actually do what they pretend is happening.
Both sides are wrong and no 1 truly understands reality…just a bunch of humans enslaved by their 5 senses