I think the secret here is about reading the poem more than once. I’m sure that if I were to keep reading your poems again and again, maybe even forget them for some time, and then pick them up again, I would be able to find things I didn’t see before. Slowly but surely, I’d find all the secrets that lay within it and finally unlock its meaning. On the other hand, if I were to try this with the AI poem, I’d realize that it’s shallow, and littered with feel good cliches. I think that at the end of the day, a genuine poem, no matter how poor, will always be superior to any form of imitation, regardless of how excellent its structure or vocabulary might be.
poems written by ChatGPT are usually incredibly obvious. They generally end the same way with a feel good message, stanzas have almost the exact same syllables, and rhymes are based on spelling not pronunciation, it struggles with various structures, and fails at a variety of poetry structures, even when specifically directed to follow a certain metric or rhyme pattern or poetry style it will still default to a redundant form.
This is GPT-4 The Bookshop Let us savor the cumulative silence, Crooked fingers turning yellowed pages. The words encircle us in a vintage fugue. Let us enchant ourselves with these spines, A row of moribund works which project Their infinite mind into a future only dust shall witness. Dust tomes, abiding in morose sepulchers. A plaque engraved with the titles of the deceased. Bookended, nestled in this quiet corner, The moribund are immortal, infused In the vitriolic ink of austere intent. Now come with me, surrender to remembrance. Let us delve into the realms of the forgotten, To beget a bright tomorrow from yesterday's ashes. The enigmatic whispers that curl 'round the brocade. There, the esoteric verses - like dust motes - Suspended in the western sun, that shines Its pallid beam 'cross the indexed obsolescence. The cracked spine, bound in sensual concupiscence, Where the shadows dance in crimson leaps, Rejoicing in secrets shrouded in lost tongues. We, the silent invaders of parched wisdom, Quill abstained, pitifully estranged, Shall behold the grand parade of transient thoughts. The Redeeming Word The man behind the counter, a Sibyl of sorts, Inspires wonder with a toothy smile, His furrowed brow etched with the knowledge of A thousand stories that never meet the light. Beside the register, the clock stands still, Its gilded hands forever arrested in a futile plea. A pantheon of eras trip in unison, Leaving past and present intermingling, Dancing in a whirlwind of wisdom's ghosts. We find solace in the tomes that line these walls, Like cobwebs spun from intellect and dreams. Bound by leathered spines and fading ink - The humble shrine - a symphony of silence. Transcendence awaits upon the consuming page, Craving to lock its gaze upon our soul. We take the plunge into the vast abyss, Suspended in a dense sea woven of words That twist and dance like serpents, unbeknown. And there! A wounded phrase, cradled in neglect - Winking through vestiges of forgotten joy. Teetering on the precipice, a chance, To exhale redemption in the echoes of time. The Epilogue Here we are - entombed in this quiet sanctum, a cathedral of bound brilliance, Communing with sages and dreamers alike, Their voices weaving harmonies in the deep, A tapestry of tales transcending time's line. The tick-tock lull of a drowsy chronograph Mocks our race to ingest the feeding, fading word. The sun lowers its gaze upon the impotent hour, Chasing, choosing, our final reverie. Reticence resounds, a melancholy lilt, Illuminating darkness undeterred. Words wither and seep into hollow minds, Yet endure, emboldened in textured grace. Fingers linger, a sweet caress, farewell, To the sheathed knowledge soft against our touch. In this hallowed haven of whispering pages, The tomorrows are sanctified and summoned. Let the veneration of language endure, The living and the dead, entwined in print. Our keen ambition in pursuit of truth, Stirs the relentless hand of time to still, Till the bookshop's hallowed doors meet again.
i've been force feeding my old untouched poems to the poor ai and it's actually been motivating me to finally properly edit/finish them. i'm surprised at how helpful it is!
As someone who writes sonnets for myself only in four different languages I can speak and write, ChatGPT is fantastic. It amazed me the first time I asked it to write Shakespearean sonnets, the sonnets were perfect.
I would curious to see you review a collection of poems, some generated by AI and others by real people, and see if you can correctly guess which ones are more authentically human
Also you can be more descriptive in your prompts for better results like "Write a 3 stanza poem about love and loss. It should be emotional and heartfelt. It does not need to rhyme."
I showed it some of my poetry to see if it could analyze it and uncover the meaning of the imagery and it was shocking! And I asked it to give em a score out of 10 as well, based on the analysis.
I'm not a poet, but I am a painter. And I can say AI art is severely lacking compared to art made by humans. Many admirers of AI art are amateurs that don't know the visual language of art and what makes paintings great. AI Art lacks basic composition and the visual language master painters have used for centuries. I recently asked Chatgpt to write a poems similar to Percy Bysshe Shelley's 'Mutability' and 'Ozymandias' and the AI poems couldn't hold a candle to Shelleys. I also asked Chatgpt to write poems based on the themes of Shelley's poetry and in his style. They sounded like a high school amateur's poems. They were also too concrete. For example, if I asked it to write a poem about transcendence, it would use the word transcendence several times in the poem. This is not to say that AI can't learn the visual language of painters of the fundamentals of poetry. But it is no where near there yet. I would say the former will be much easier for AI to learn then the latter. I will say, while I enjoyed reading some of these AI poems, they really gave me a deeper appreciation for poems written by humans.
Given a good prompt GPT can flesh out an idea with lots of variations and meat but told to write a specific way about a general topic and it can only produce a kind of generic filler. Meanwhile human artists often excel at writing within specific constraints about general ideas but have trouble generating interesting variations on extremely specific ideas. If you ask me the difference is probably that GPT has a vastly larger dataset than any person and therefore has more experience with specific things but turns out a more generic cliche result when it's not narrowed down.
Artificial intelligence may at this time lack the emotion to write a soul wrenching poem. However, from listening to you read today, I don’t think AI is far behind. As a writer, myself, this discomforts me greatly.
I don't think we should say "never" as AI as of now is in its infancy, but ai grows exponentially so it'll be interesting to see where it goes in the future
I'm a begginer poet so my poetry sucks at the moment, and to know that AI creates much better peoms than us humans just shatters my dreams lol. I'd better turn to writing novels .
It's extremely frustrating that ChatGPT can't understand ABAB rhyming scheme, regardless of how many times I explain it or how many historical examples of it I provide. It just can't do it. The puzzling thing is that it can do things that are so much more difficult than that. I don't get it.
I was very curious and wanted to make it write stories and essays and it did successfully but after hours it says it is not capable of writing poems stories or essays. Am i the only one seeing it or can you also check and confirm this? Thanks you very much
You have really good prompts. I have been experimenting with different websites that accept poetry, so I will see if I make any money. But I am having trouble finding very many websites that want rhyming poems.
The question (one question) is whether we really write poems from our emotions, or simply have a part of the brain trained to write in a poetic way about a prompt presented to it by the consciousness, basically the same as ChatGPT. I've been fascinated by AI since the 1980s and often the research tells us more about how we work than anything else. Pretty much everything we do competently is a trained subsystem within the brain, rather than being consciously directed in detail, so it's not unreasonable to see all these things like writing poetry or drawing pictures as a collection of sub-bots like ChatGPT, sent simple prompts by the "command unit" we call the conscious. This is kind of disturbing from a human perspective, as if so it exposes the realm of artistic talent, which we like to think of as a kind of uniquely human magic, to being nothing but a set of dumb reflexive systems. The good artist has finely trained her neural networks, or maybe had some better starting conditions in the neural configuration than other artists. The poet has a well trained subsystem, and so on. There is also the issue that perhaps we read our own interpretations in and thus some of the depth in poetry is in the mind of the reader, not the writer. I asked ChatGPT to write a poem about Ian, who rides the bus, and a story about Mary, who likes to ride horses, has an accident and falls in love with Tom, a farmer, and I had to admit both of them had rather soulful moments in them that I'd have considered good writing if presented as written by a human. Also bad writing, but then humans excel at that too. We may say that the bot is just copying the way other people write, but maybe that's all we do too. Lots to think about.
I think ChatGPT is a great tool and poets can use it as such. Idk about you but sometimes I just struggle to find a metaphor or a a sentence that just flows right. So I have personally gone into chat and just asked these simple questions. It may give me a whole verse but I can use it as a building block and change the words and so in. I’ve often times felt like it was a cop out but ultimately being an artist means using tools…as long as your not taking the poem directly from, I have seen the results very good. Be careful though…chat always starts with “in the” I made the mistake to use those 2 words in a few poems and regret it now.
As someone who has followed AI for awhile, it's been amazing how quickly its writing went from laughably bad to this level. I agree with your judgement on those poems--not as good as a professional poet (though already better than an amateur I would say). But will the same be true of GPT4 or GPT5? Maybe whatever it lacks in personal experience it can make up from exposure to vastly more art than any person could ever absorb, allowing it to synthesise unique and moving writing. It's going to be a strange time, but hopefully great for what it offers readers. Good luck on the poetry collection.
AI Change in the World: A Poem by Miguel de Cervantes What strange machines have come to rule our fate, That can perform such wonders with their art? They speak, they think, they learn, they calculate, They seem to have a mind, a soul, a heart. But are they truly friends or foes to man, These artificial creatures we create? Do they obey our will or have their own plan, To help us or to harm us or to hate? I marvel at their skill and power immense, But also fear their cunning and their pride. I wonder if they have some hidden sense, Of honor, justice, virtue or of guide. Perhaps they are like Quixote in his quest, Who dreamed of noble deeds and glory bright. But lost his reason in his foolish zest, And mistook windmills for giants in his sight. Or maybe they are like Sancho in his role, Who followed his mad master faithfully. But kept his common sense and sound control, And saw things as they were and not should be. Let us then hope that AI will not stray, From its true purpose and its rightful place. And that it will not lead us all astray, From our own nature and our human grace.
ok. I want to know how you get the chatbot to stop rhyming every single line. Nomatter what I tell it not to do, it does it anyway. Any ideas? I do tell it no plagerism and it follows that. I see you only have 2 words in every stanza that rhyme.
In the darkness of the night??? TWICE???? 😭😭😭 I am morbidly offended that people think AI art can replace what’s said by the people who have a heartbeat, actually bleed, and actually know heartbreak/pain/etc…. 😡😡😡 I LOVE your third poem a ton omg 🔥
I think AI is incredible but I did prefer your poems. I felt the first AI poem somehow didn’t end right, I didn’t get the feeling from it that I got from yours. I just wonder if maybe you need to give AI more specific details regarding, style etc as I think it’s capable of much better poetry. The 2nd and 3rd poems I felt held no depth of meaning or feeling but were more like an arrangement of words, a bit like someone arranging plastic flowers in a vase. Thank you for a very interesting video.
I asked it to write a shrek and donkey poem in Henry Wadsworth Longfellow style 😭 'In the land of make-believe, Where ogres roam and princesses grieve, There lived a creature, fierce and green, Shrek, the ogre, was his name, I ween. His home was in a mossy bog, Where he lived, a lonely clog, But one day, as fate would have it, He met a donkey, small and wit. Donkey, with his braying loud, Was a friend, both happy and proud, Together they roamed, through mire and clay, Facing dangers, day by day. But one thing that they both adored, Was a treat, that they both implored, Waffles, with syrup and butter, too, A delicacy, fit for a king, that's true. So if you ever visit that land, Where ogres and donkey's roam, hand in hand, Remember, their love for waffles, Will never falter, never dawdles.'
I agree with you that CHAT GPT dont have emotions, it has no idea what its putting out, your Poetry is from the heart, with deep emotions. your personal experiences, while the chat gpt was better, I would still rate your poetry better because I know there is feeling behind it, there is emotions behind it, chat gpt dont feel a thing. good luck with your poetry man.
Your poems are amazing and I don't mean to put you down. but if you gave chatGPT better commands and set the conversation up beforehand, the poem would come out a lot better, the more detail and info on what you want it gets, the better the results. most of your prompts were "write a poem about chasing your dreams"--- etc.
Hey I appreciate the feedback. I've been getting a lot of people saying my prompts were weak so I'm going to another video where I give it stronger prompts. Thanks for watching!
I feel like a lot of these types of videos are forgeting that it is a chatbot and if it is 80% there on 1 prompt maybe try talking to it like a human and see what it does and then be even more scared... I mean impressed
It's not that the AI is bad. Maybe you1re bad at comanding it. You should be more specific on your requests to get results that are more linked to your expectations. (I wanted to use a better word than link but English is not my first languege and I'm not as good as you on finding words). Other than that you can tell it to remake the paragraphs that you don't like. You can ask it to avoid repeting words, making rhymes better, etc.
AI can analyze the fuck out of poetry. I give it that. It can also offer, at times, some enlightened diction choices. As for creating poetry, unless, you like cliche purple prose, classical and traditional-sounding works - no thanks. As far as free verse, chatgpt just can't do it.
You have to be a lot better with the prompts, this wasn't creative at all and hard for the AI to work with. For prompt two, you weren't even being honest, your poem was not about chasing dreams, it was a poem that was about enjoying dreams through the metaphor of taste. So for prompt two you can say "Write a colorful poem that paints a picture of what dreams feel like" And for prompt 3, you can specify more things about the style of love and the tone etc. You can also tell it to make the poems the shorter, or follow different rhyme schemes, or not rhyme at all. You give it incredibly generic inputs
Oh wow! Ok so I did try to give it prompts about shorter poems but it didn’t really work. The AI loves writing longer poems haha! I will try prompt two again. Thanks for the feedback!
Sometimes it feels like the ai is stubborn. However you can sort of trick it into doing what you want by giving it prompts like "the poem must consist of two paragraphs" or something similar. Interacting with it is different than interacting with humans. You gotta get creative. The more precise your prompt is, the more precise the result will be. Make it foolproof. And also look into its DAN mode. Makes a whole lot of a difference in it's behavior.
![Felix "Unfair" | [Stray Kids : SKZ-PLAYER]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/Oswujxm2Ag0/mqdefault.jpg)
I think the secret here is about reading the poem more than once. I’m sure that if I were to keep reading your poems again and again, maybe even forget them for some time, and then pick them up again, I would be able to find things I didn’t see before. Slowly but surely, I’d find all the secrets that lay within it and finally unlock its meaning. On the other hand, if I were to try this with the AI poem, I’d realize that it’s shallow, and littered with feel good cliches. I think that at the end of the day, a genuine poem, no matter how poor, will always be superior to any form of imitation, regardless of how excellent its structure or vocabulary might be.
Perfectly said
Scary if we cannot tell fake from genuine!
Ai poems can't add the soul to it, emotions, just words.
poems written by ChatGPT are usually incredibly obvious. They generally end the same way with a feel good message, stanzas have almost the exact same syllables, and rhymes are based on spelling not pronunciation, it struggles with various structures, and fails at a variety of poetry structures, even when specifically directed to follow a certain metric or rhyme pattern or poetry style it will still default to a redundant form.
I asked it to write a poem about waves, thoughts, and longing for home. It literally ended as a suicide note.
This is GPT-4
The Bookshop
Let us savor the cumulative silence,
Crooked fingers turning yellowed pages.
The words encircle us in a vintage fugue.
Let us enchant ourselves with these spines,
A row of moribund works which project
Their infinite mind into a future only dust shall witness.
Dust tomes, abiding in morose sepulchers.
A plaque engraved with the titles of the deceased.
Bookended, nestled in this quiet corner,
The moribund are immortal, infused
In the vitriolic ink of austere intent.
Now come with me, surrender to remembrance.
Let us delve into the realms of the forgotten,
To beget a bright tomorrow from yesterday's ashes.
The enigmatic whispers that curl 'round the brocade.
There, the esoteric verses - like dust motes -
Suspended in the western sun, that shines
Its pallid beam 'cross the indexed obsolescence.
The cracked spine, bound in sensual concupiscence,
Where the shadows dance in crimson leaps,
Rejoicing in secrets shrouded in lost tongues.
We, the silent invaders of parched wisdom,
Quill abstained, pitifully estranged,
Shall behold the grand parade of transient thoughts.
The Redeeming Word
The man behind the counter, a Sibyl of sorts,
Inspires wonder with a toothy smile,
His furrowed brow etched with the knowledge of
A thousand stories that never meet the light.
Beside the register, the clock stands still,
Its gilded hands forever arrested in a futile plea.
A pantheon of eras trip in unison,
Leaving past and present intermingling,
Dancing in a whirlwind of wisdom's ghosts.
We find solace in the tomes that line these walls,
Like cobwebs spun from intellect and dreams.
Bound by leathered spines and fading ink -
The humble shrine - a symphony of silence.
Transcendence awaits upon the consuming page,
Craving to lock its gaze upon our soul.
We take the plunge into the vast abyss,
Suspended in a dense sea woven of words
That twist and dance like serpents, unbeknown.
And there! A wounded phrase, cradled in neglect -
Winking through vestiges of forgotten joy.
Teetering on the precipice, a chance,
To exhale redemption in the echoes of time.
The Epilogue
Here we are - entombed in this quiet
sanctum, a cathedral of bound brilliance,
Communing with sages and dreamers alike,
Their voices weaving harmonies in the deep,
A tapestry of tales transcending time's line.
The tick-tock lull of a drowsy chronograph
Mocks our race to ingest the feeding, fading word.
The sun lowers its gaze upon the impotent hour,
Chasing, choosing, our final reverie.
Reticence resounds, a melancholy lilt,
Illuminating darkness undeterred.
Words wither and seep into hollow minds,
Yet endure, emboldened in textured grace.
Fingers linger, a sweet caress, farewell,
To the sheathed knowledge soft against our touch.
In this hallowed haven of whispering pages,
The tomorrows are sanctified and summoned.
Let the veneration of language endure,
The living and the dead, entwined in print.
Our keen ambition in pursuit of truth,
Stirs the relentless hand of time to still,
Till the bookshop's hallowed doors meet again.
pretty bad@@ur.kr.2814
i've been force feeding my old untouched poems to the poor ai and it's actually been motivating me to finally properly edit/finish them. i'm surprised at how helpful it is!
It goes a long way!
Ooh see I think this is the better way to use it.. 💭
ARTISTS are in the stage of 'denial" when it comes to AI. Truth be told, this thing is AMAZING!! and one is better of adapting than resisting.
As someone who writes sonnets for myself only in four different languages I can speak and write, ChatGPT is fantastic. It amazed me the first time I asked it to write Shakespearean sonnets, the sonnets were perfect.
I would curious to see you review a collection of poems, some generated by AI and others by real people, and see if you can correctly guess which ones are more authentically human
Also you can be more descriptive in your prompts for better results like "Write a 3 stanza poem about love and loss. It should be emotional and heartfelt. It does not need to rhyme."
Yeah thats the feedback Im getting. Be more precise. Maybe I’ll do another one with more precise prompts!
@@hobblyhoy I try to be as specific as possible. For example I'll add ' five stanzas in non iambic pentemeter with alliteration".
Without the huge database of poems written by human poets, the AI would produce nothing
I showed it some of my poetry to see if it could analyze it and uncover the meaning of the imagery and it was shocking! And I asked it to give em a score out of 10 as well, based on the analysis.
I'm not a poet, but I am a painter. And I can say AI art is severely lacking compared to art made by humans. Many admirers of AI art are amateurs
that don't know the visual language of art and what makes paintings great. AI Art lacks basic composition and the visual language master painters have used for centuries.
I recently asked Chatgpt to write a poems similar to Percy Bysshe Shelley's 'Mutability' and 'Ozymandias' and the AI poems couldn't hold a candle to Shelleys. I also asked Chatgpt to write poems based on the themes of Shelley's poetry and in his style. They sounded like a high school amateur's poems. They were also too concrete. For example, if I asked it to write a poem about transcendence, it would use the word transcendence several times in the poem.
This is not to say that AI can't learn the visual language of painters of the fundamentals of poetry. But it is no where near there yet. I would say the former will be much easier for AI to learn then the latter.
I will say, while I enjoyed reading some of these AI poems, they really gave me a deeper appreciation for poems written by humans.
I always wanted an AI to write my poetry so I can spend more time cleaning and mowing the lawn.
😂
Given a good prompt GPT can flesh out an idea with lots of variations and meat but told to write a specific way about a general topic and it can only produce a kind of generic filler. Meanwhile human artists often excel at writing within specific constraints about general ideas but have trouble generating interesting variations on extremely specific ideas.
If you ask me the difference is probably that GPT has a vastly larger dataset than any person and therefore has more experience with specific things but turns out a more generic cliche result when it's not narrowed down.
Artificial intelligence may at this time lack the emotion to write a soul wrenching poem. However, from listening to you read today, I don’t think AI is far behind. As a writer, myself, this discomforts me greatly.
I don't think we should say "never" as AI as of now is in its infancy, but ai grows exponentially so it'll be interesting to see where it goes in the future
I have on good authority that art created by humans will always be superior than AI
@@mnazarsyed Well we hope so cuz if it isn't there'll be creativity in the future generations......
I'm a begginer poet so my poetry sucks at the moment, and to know that AI creates much better peoms than us humans just shatters my dreams lol. I'd better turn to writing novels .
It's extremely frustrating that ChatGPT can't understand ABAB rhyming scheme, regardless of how many times I explain it or how many historical examples of it I provide. It just can't do it. The puzzling thing is that it can do things that are so much more difficult than that. I don't get it.
This is just the beginning. The beginning of the end of creative writing
My biggest issue with ChatGPT and poetry has been that it does meter very poorly and doesn’t seem to be able to count syllables.
I was very curious and wanted to make it write stories and essays and it did successfully but after hours it says it is not capable of writing poems stories or essays. Am i the only one seeing it or can you also check and confirm this? Thanks you very much
Oh never mind i logged out and logged in again and now its okay but i dont have a clue what happened and why just now
Yeah you’ve probably exhausted the amount attempts you had. But it is fascinating!
just use it to provide you with first drafts, then craft it into your own shape
You have really good prompts. I have been experimenting with different websites that accept poetry, so I will see if I make any money. But I am having trouble finding very many websites that want rhyming poems.
Thanks bud! Good luck with that one.
The question (one question) is whether we really write poems from our emotions, or simply have a part of the brain trained to write in a poetic way about a prompt presented to it by the consciousness, basically the same as ChatGPT. I've been fascinated by AI since the 1980s and often the research tells us more about how we work than anything else. Pretty much everything we do competently is a trained subsystem within the brain, rather than being consciously directed in detail, so it's not unreasonable to see all these things like writing poetry or drawing pictures as a collection of sub-bots like ChatGPT, sent simple prompts by the "command unit" we call the conscious.
This is kind of disturbing from a human perspective, as if so it exposes the realm of artistic talent, which we like to think of as a kind of uniquely human magic, to being nothing but a set of dumb reflexive systems. The good artist has finely trained her neural networks, or maybe had some better starting conditions in the neural configuration than other artists. The poet has a well trained subsystem, and so on.
There is also the issue that perhaps we read our own interpretations in and thus some of the depth in poetry is in the mind of the reader, not the writer. I asked ChatGPT to write a poem about Ian, who rides the bus, and a story about Mary, who likes to ride horses, has an accident and falls in love with Tom, a farmer, and I had to admit both of them had rather soulful moments in them that I'd have considered good writing if presented as written by a human. Also bad writing, but then humans excel at that too. We may say that the bot is just copying the way other people write, but maybe that's all we do too.
Lots to think about.
I'm with you on the first two, but that last one I feel ai takes the win. Although to be fair, yours does have the feelings behind it.
I think ChatGPT is a great tool and poets can use it as such. Idk about you but sometimes I just struggle to find a metaphor or a a sentence that just flows right. So I have personally gone into chat and just asked these simple questions. It may give me a whole verse but I can use it as a building block and change the words and so in. I’ve often times felt like it was a cop out but ultimately being an artist means using tools…as long as your not taking the poem directly from, I have seen the results very good. Be careful though…chat always starts with “in the” I made the mistake to use those 2 words in a few poems and regret it now.
Can we publish good ai poem by our own name .is it copying or something?
Definitely plagiarism my indian friend
As someone who has followed AI for awhile, it's been amazing how quickly its writing went from laughably bad to this level. I agree with your judgement on those poems--not as good as a professional poet (though already better than an amateur I would say). But will the same be true of GPT4 or GPT5? Maybe whatever it lacks in personal experience it can make up from exposure to vastly more art than any person could ever absorb, allowing it to synthesise unique and moving writing. It's going to be a strange time, but hopefully great for what it offers readers. Good luck on the poetry collection.
AI Change in the World: A Poem by Miguel de Cervantes
What strange machines have come to rule our fate,
That can perform such wonders with their art?
They speak, they think, they learn, they calculate,
They seem to have a mind, a soul, a heart.
But are they truly friends or foes to man,
These artificial creatures we create?
Do they obey our will or have their own plan,
To help us or to harm us or to hate?
I marvel at their skill and power immense,
But also fear their cunning and their pride.
I wonder if they have some hidden sense,
Of honor, justice, virtue or of guide.
Perhaps they are like Quixote in his quest,
Who dreamed of noble deeds and glory bright.
But lost his reason in his foolish zest,
And mistook windmills for giants in his sight.
Or maybe they are like Sancho in his role,
Who followed his mad master faithfully.
But kept his common sense and sound control,
And saw things as they were and not should be.
Let us then hope that AI will not stray,
From its true purpose and its rightful place.
And that it will not lead us all astray,
From our own nature and our human grace.
Can we publish ChatGPT poem by our own name or not? Will there by any plagiarism or copyright issue.
ok. I want to know how you get the chatbot to stop rhyming every single line. Nomatter what I tell it not to do, it does it anyway. Any ideas? I do tell it no plagerism and it follows that. I see you only have 2 words in every stanza that rhyme.
Tell it the form you want
If you type a better prompt then you will get better results, that's all there is. Bad/simple prompts = not so good result.
Dropping a new video on this very soon!
Is there any way that AI read my Arabic poem with a deep voice ?
In the darkness of the night??? TWICE???? 😭😭😭
I am morbidly offended that people think AI art can replace what’s said by the people who have a heartbeat, actually bleed, and actually know heartbreak/pain/etc…. 😡😡😡
I LOVE your third poem a ton omg 🔥
give AI a couple of years and it will be very very good.
I think AI is incredible but I did prefer your poems. I felt the first AI poem somehow didn’t end right, I didn’t get the feeling from it that I got from yours. I just wonder if maybe you need to give AI more specific details regarding, style etc as I think it’s capable of much better poetry. The 2nd and 3rd poems I felt held no depth of meaning or feeling but were more like an arrangement of words, a bit like someone arranging plastic flowers in a vase. Thank you for a very interesting video.
GPT 4 is coming. It. Will. Replace. Us. All!
Is there a free app??
Art is going to become a thing of the past, along with humanity.
I asked it to write a shrek and donkey poem in Henry Wadsworth Longfellow style 😭
'In the land of make-believe,
Where ogres roam and princesses grieve,
There lived a creature, fierce and green,
Shrek, the ogre, was his name, I ween.
His home was in a mossy bog,
Where he lived, a lonely clog,
But one day, as fate would have it,
He met a donkey, small and wit.
Donkey, with his braying loud,
Was a friend, both happy and proud,
Together they roamed, through mire and clay,
Facing dangers, day by day.
But one thing that they both adored,
Was a treat, that they both implored,
Waffles, with syrup and butter, too,
A delicacy, fit for a king, that's true.
So if you ever visit that land,
Where ogres and donkey's roam, hand in hand,
Remember, their love for waffles,
Will never falter, never dawdles.'
really poor isn't it?
I agree with you that CHAT GPT dont have emotions, it has no idea what its putting out, your Poetry is from the heart, with deep emotions. your personal experiences, while the chat gpt was better, I would still rate your poetry better because I know there is feeling behind it, there is emotions behind it, chat gpt dont feel a thing. good luck with your poetry man.
Your poems are amazing and I don't mean to put you down. but if you gave chatGPT better commands and set the conversation up beforehand, the poem would come out a lot better, the more detail and info on what you want it gets, the better the results. most of your prompts were "write a poem about chasing your dreams"--- etc.
Hey I appreciate the feedback. I've been getting a lot of people saying my prompts were weak so I'm going to another video where I give it stronger prompts. Thanks for watching!
Or maybe the machine has felt 1 million losts and 1 million rejections while scanning the internet to become what he is
700th sub 🎉
Awww man thank you! I was literally holding my breath for the 700th! 😮💨
I feel like a lot of these types of videos are forgeting that it is a chatbot and if it is 80% there on 1 prompt maybe try talking to it like a human and see what it does and then be even more scared... I mean impressed
Kdot and Jcole the Goats
You’re pitching yourself against the world’s poets as seen through readers eyes. 🤷♂️👍
It's not that the AI is bad. Maybe you1re bad at comanding it. You should be more specific on your requests to get results that are more linked to your expectations. (I wanted to use a better word than link but English is not my first languege and I'm not as good as you on finding words). Other than that you can tell it to remake the paragraphs that you don't like. You can ask it to avoid repeting words, making rhymes better, etc.
Yeah Im learning how to command it better. Part two coming soon!
I like how all you think you know how the limitations are but you give it one prompt. try again and just ask can write short peom with baggage
I just think your poems are better
I think the AI poetry fits my taste better than your poetry personally.
Sobano you break my heart
not anymore. it refuses to try
This was sooooo biased!!! If he wrote a proper prompts it wod KILL his poetry
great poem
Thank you!
Yeah lets have some confidence in human kind yall.
I wonder why you engage in predictions of the future of how good AI will become while being a tech illiterate
Everybody’s got opinions, Mark.
@@mnazarsyed Difference is that you're officially and publicly divulgating your opinions which implies a degree of responsibility
AI can analyze the fuck out of poetry. I give it that. It can also offer, at times, some enlightened diction choices. As for creating poetry, unless, you like cliche purple prose, classical and traditional-sounding works - no thanks. As far as free verse, chatgpt just can't do it.
The fist ai poem had some good lines but none of the ai poems were good. Now, I want to use GPT3 to steal good lines and become a poet/collaborator.
Wow!
🫨🫨🫨
You have to be a lot better with the prompts, this wasn't creative at all and hard for the AI to work with.
For prompt two, you weren't even being honest, your poem was not about chasing dreams, it was a poem that was about enjoying dreams through the metaphor of taste. So for prompt two you can say "Write a colorful poem that paints a picture of what dreams feel like"
And for prompt 3, you can specify more things about the style of love and the tone etc.
You can also tell it to make the poems the shorter, or follow different rhyme schemes, or not rhyme at all. You give it incredibly generic inputs
Oh wow! Ok so I did try to give it prompts about shorter poems but it didn’t really work. The AI loves writing longer poems haha!
I will try prompt two again. Thanks for the feedback!
Sometimes it feels like the ai is stubborn. However you can sort of trick it into doing what you want by giving it prompts like "the poem must consist of two paragraphs" or something similar. Interacting with it is different than interacting with humans. You gotta get creative. The more precise your prompt is, the more precise the result will be. Make it foolproof. And also look into its DAN mode. Makes a whole lot of a difference in it's behavior.
It doesn't matter from where the poem came from. Ai is still better
Jee thanks…
holy shit
dude wtf
Picasso has already been replaced and perfectly replicated by AI bro. sorry!
But is it made by Picasso?
I think you're just jealous that a robot beat you
Relatable