I hope you are single by choice and for your own peace rather than you are alone because you have hate toward women. In this case its pathetic and not a flex
Women, could be useful in paying the bills, cleaning the house and shopping for goods. Other than these factors, what is the absurd point of their company?
Well, biological and historical records show male animals are born very horny and the basic lust for raw sex. Without the innate lure females bodies have in provoking male lust. Males would leave woman alone as there is a bitchyness in the female of nagging , mood swings and a flare for drama and rage.
Because you are forced to live with someone who has the intellect of a 12 years old and you feel like wasting your time and thoughts on them and their simplistic matters instead of thinking about more important stuff
@@RavinaPandeIn my experience the majority, if not all women like that are one of two: they would jump out of the wagon of career the moment they have a husband/boyfriend with enough money OR they are people of "one trick" in other words, all their lives circles around on that only activity to the point you can't have any kind of conversation with them that doesn't involve their job. And if they are non of this two cases, they seem (at least to me) hollow in spirit, doing what they learned to be, waiting one of the two scenaries above.
Everybody hates marriage. That’s why only 10% of married couples are happily married. And the 50% divorce rate only applies to first marriages. Any subsequent marriages have progressively higher divorce rates. Also, in some areas the divorce rate is as high as 75%. When I was in the navy we used to joke that both the navy and the state of Wyoming had 75% divorce rates. So apparently three/quarters of all sailors and cowboys are philosophers. So it’s not just philosophers who find women annoying. In other words even blue collar workers find it annoying to get their credit card balances run up by silly women who waste their money on useless shit like flowers and clothing.
I am now essentially friendless. My friends from the past enjoyed watching games and playing Madden. In many ways I wished I could be as fulfilled as they seemed to be by those things. Finally I just stopped coming around. Some might think I did that for me, but I did it for them. I bored the piss outta those guys. 😂 The concepts that I find intriguing, tend to be of limited or no interest to pretty much every single human being I happen across. So I remain only with the person who seems interested in the things I do, me.
@@bkwhpo I’m big into God. The nature of reality. Physics, extraterrestrials, philosophy, entrepreneurship, wealth building, politics, human psychology, human liberation, bodybuilding, strength training. Other things.
@@mrwojna tanks for replying. to be honest, i think the things you find interesting, although aren’t at all as popular as video games, films,etc, they still have a few solid enjoyers. but it really needs much more effort to find them in real life.
@@bkwhpo Indeed. My wife is very tolerant. She hears me out. I appreciate that. I’m not complaining about the lack of interaction with like minded folks. It’s actually pretty liberating. I never sit around wanting to go out to the club, or mingle, because I know it’s more than likely to prove fruitless. Now I’m just waiting for my time to run out on this planet.
Good video. The problem is that the intellect does not equal wisdom. So philosophers can be lone thinkers as much as they want but at some point they'll have to live life to grow in wisdom. Instead of avoiding major facets of it. Heartbreak, loss of loved ones, betrayal, brotherhood, overcoming fears, mastery of a skill are examples of things that give wisdom. Thinking about life won't give as much wisdom as just living it fully. Instead many phillsophers choose to live in their heads and see reality through the mental models they have crafted. Dostoevsky wrote a lot about such types. While reality can never be reduced to a mental model. This trap is infamous in religious and spiritual traditions.
What people are missing is that philosophy never existed without logic and maths. You would not be allowed to Plato's academy without fluency in all contemporary maths. Some lazy people just frequently try to call themselves philosophers while they can't even be bothered to learn formal logic. In modern times, one should not be allowed to study philosophy without knowledge of higher mathematics and the latter should be strictly connected to the course. There is no philosophy without strict methods of evaluation.
just who do you think you are? you think these so-called philosophers have absolutely no life experience and live entirely within their heads? what a patronizing and ridiculous statement.
How did you recognize AI in the script beside the images? The script sound like a men full of resentment, hate AND use useless words like "so when..." This video Is just an opinion of a petty person.
even though i choose to remain single but i dont hate women. infact i like their company. this comment section seems like confession room for Unlaid people.
Never thought of it, its true. Ive never seen a married philosopher. Also, i remember watching red pill content once when someone said if you having a conversation and want to women to go elsewhere without insulting them, switch the conversation to philosophy and watch how all the women disappear. Now the math is complete. 1+1=2
Not too many that fits that criteria. If men were to just focus on a woman that is philosophical and nothing else, that is slim. Add in all the other things that make up a pleasant woman, and you are looking at the good’ol 1% of women. It’s a tough world out there.
@@deathandrebirth-y8x women don't work? That's statistically false. There are lazy women, true, but there are lazy men too, and they don't represent the majority hence your generalization is invalid. And not wanting a broke guy is good - this is why historically the groom pays dowry to prove financial capacity. No father wants to see his daughter become poor because of a broke dude.
Great minds can see women’s nature. There is a lot of evil in women today, and it’s worse because of a leftist society in the West. However, there is a good in women too obviously. It’s just way more rare in the state of society since they are poisoning every women
There is no gay thing involved. Well, so called sexual energy is an energy form which you can use, save or redirect. Directly using it would be having sexual relationship(s). Saving or redirecting it would be using your energy as a fuel of what you enjoy: Science, philosophy, art and so on. After sex men gets physical pleasure but loses energy. I as an artist use my sexual energy to create my art, I don't hate women, I set my own priorities this way. There is nothing wrong with having sex/relationships if one priorities those, It's just a matter of taste.
@furiousinsects6386 yep, before puberty I was drawing, building model airplanes, just creative. After puberty hit all i did was beat off and chase girls smoked cigarettes, ect. Pretty much all the bad shyt I did started because of chasing that nut high. Sad but true
You cant live with them and you cant live without them. Simple saying but it’s true, but honestly if it wasnt for sex and our human need to bond to them most men couldn't even have a woman. Were generally to independent to need a partner and put up with the nagging and complaing etc
I like philosophy but this is kind of cope No, women may not be so philosophically inclined but it’s also the fact that most people drawn to philosophy are not exactly winning at life to begin with. I guarantee you Espinoza or Nietzsche would have liked female company if they could regularly have it. What we perceive as the more mundane nature of women may just be the fact that they are in some ways more practical than men despite being less logical. Men, especially philosophers, must exert extra effort to avoid letting their logic lead to aberrant philosophies and conclusions less compatible with reality than the superficial vanity of women.
@@jurassicthunder he literally proposed to a woman multiple times who didn’t even reciprocate his interest If your philosophy doesn’t reflect reality well enough to have at least a normie level of success at a time when there wasn’t this absurd inflation of women’s value your philosophy is incomplete or you suffer from some kind of dissonance
@@adriantepesut Nietzsche experienced unrequited love, wow, that means he must've been hated by all women in his life as a result of his philosophy! Back to reality, in his early adulthood, he was a successful academic with close ties to one of the most prominent musicians and other cultural figures of his time, which gave him access to fancy parties and meetings. That means, Nietzsche most definitely, at least at one point in his life, experienced a much richer social life than you could ever aspire to have (and I KNOW you aspire to these things as based on what you've just wrote, I KNOW you obsess over social status) It is only in his later adulthood when he became debilitated from sickness that he became more isolated. His philosophy also reflects this. And this guy couldn't even be bothered to read Nietzsche's biography, then proceeds to vomit out his opinion. Talks about philosophy aligning with reality like he has a clue. What an absolutely worthless individual.
@@gumis123PL I didn’t say he was a social reject Having a good social life does not mean you aren’t a pathetic simp for women And proposing multiple times to a woman who doesn’t reciprocate your interest is pathetic and indicates some dissonance between Nietzsche and his philosophy I am not big into status nor do I even claim to be some kind of chad, but even today the least a guy can do is not be a pathetic simp for women not interested in them which is especially true for someone of Nietzsche’s higher status who furthermore lived in a time where men still benefited from the fact the internet didn’t exist and that women weren’t sexually liberated Not even saying he should have been some kind of chad, just that he should have experienced at least a normie level of success with women especially in light of what you said about his status Even if I were completely wrong about Nietzsche my main point is in response to this video that seems to be trying to suggest philosophers are too high and mighty for women when I’m saying that’s cope; most philosophers would love female companionship but struggle like a vast majority of men and that something about women’s social sensitivity and intuition counteracts the tendency men have to use their superior logic to follow certain premises incompatible with reality too far I suppose what’s even worse than simping is defending a man who’s simping as you are doing because I pointed out this more embarrassing moment in Nietzsche’s life which is undeniably pathetic. I like Nietzsche but simping is pathetic no matter who does it but Nietzsche furthermore had the insight to rationally perceive the contrasting wills between all men and women yet still gave a woman that kind of power over him without any reciprocated investment from her
A man is half. Without woman, you may live long and happy, but you’ve tackled nothing, engaged nothing, solved nothing. A game of Solitaire. Hardly a life of intellectual pursuit.
They knew women are trouble.
man are sooo innocent yes keep dreaming sir
Absolutly. They are philosophers for a reason 😂💜✌
I think most people are trouble. 😂
Most philosophers don't hate women, they might criticize them but they don't hate them. They also heavily criticize men to.
Men tend to value the LOGOS
Women the MYTHOS
Obviously
Simple answer. Philosophers like to think, and it’s near impossible to do that with women nearby.
THIS. They're so incredibly empty and soul-sucking. "Entertain meeeeeee!!!!"
I’m so glad I’m turning 41 years old and single
I hope you are single by choice and for your own peace rather than you are alone because you have hate toward women. In this case its pathetic and not a flex
@@GoldenBeetl3 it is mostly by choice
I'm glad too
@@GoldenBeetl3most of these guys are single because they can’t attract women
@@GoldenBeetl3bruhh check his replies, he hates them cause they did something bad to him 😕
I prefer my own company
Cope
I do, too.
@@arvyreyes7782 what is your problem??
Yeah, I would just ignore all this verbal fluff and jump to Schopenhauer to learn why.
facts he kneweth the way
Women, could be useful in paying the bills, cleaning the house and shopping for goods. Other than these factors, what is the absurd point of their company?
Well, biological and historical records show male animals are born very horny and the basic lust for raw sex. Without the innate lure females bodies have in provoking male lust. Males would leave woman alone as there is a bitchyness in the female of nagging , mood swings and a flare for drama and rage.
"i aM tHe taBLe"
So we can ask you if you think that waitress is hot. There is no right answer 😅😅😅
They aren't useful for that as well.
paying the bills??😂😂
Because you are forced to live with someone who has the intellect of a 12 years old and you feel like wasting your time and thoughts on them and their simplistic matters instead of thinking about more important stuff
Women aren't like this. They are very intelligent today they are a doctor, a scientist, a philosopher just like u men.
@@RavinaPandeyeah the difficulties dealing with women isn’t due to their lack of intellect
@@RavinaPandeIn my experience the majority, if not all women like that are one of two: they would jump out of the wagon of career the moment they have a husband/boyfriend with enough money OR they are people of "one trick" in other words, all their lives circles around on that only activity to the point you can't have any kind of conversation with them that doesn't involve their job.
And if they are non of this two cases, they seem (at least to me) hollow in spirit, doing what they learned to be, waiting one of the two scenaries above.
@@betinsky2678 blah blah blah
@@betinsky2678Man this is exactly it
Everybody hates marriage. That’s why only 10% of married couples are happily married. And the 50% divorce rate only applies to first marriages. Any subsequent marriages have progressively higher divorce rates. Also, in some areas the divorce rate is as high as 75%. When I was in the navy we used to joke that both the navy and the state of Wyoming had 75% divorce rates. So apparently three/quarters of all sailors and cowboys are philosophers. So it’s not just philosophers who find women annoying. In other words even blue collar workers find it annoying to get their credit card balances run up by silly women who waste their money on useless shit like flowers and clothing.
Every philosopher's wife would believe themselves superior to their husband
I am now essentially friendless. My friends from the past enjoyed watching games and playing Madden. In many ways I wished I could be as fulfilled as they seemed to be by those things. Finally I just stopped coming around. Some might think I did that for me, but I did it for them. I bored the piss outta those guys. 😂
The concepts that I find intriguing, tend to be of limited or no interest to pretty much every single human being I happen across. So I remain only with the person who seems interested in the things I do, me.
hello,
i’m curious,
what concepts you find interesting?
@@bkwhpo I’m big into God. The nature of reality. Physics, extraterrestrials, philosophy, entrepreneurship, wealth building, politics, human psychology, human liberation, bodybuilding, strength training. Other things.
@@mrwojna tanks for replying.
to be honest, i think the things you find interesting, although aren’t at all as popular as video games, films,etc, they still have a few solid enjoyers. but it really needs much more effort to find them in real life.
@@bkwhpo Indeed. My wife is very tolerant. She hears me out. I appreciate that. I’m not complaining about the lack of interaction with like minded folks. It’s actually pretty liberating. I never sit around wanting to go out to the club, or mingle, because I know it’s more than likely to prove fruitless. Now I’m just waiting for my time to run out on this planet.
@mrwojna Nonetheless, you can help people out as you wait for the clock to run out. Why not? Maybe you do that already..
You simply can't think with a woman screaming at you!!
It’s ok bro, you’re not an incel, you’re a philosopher!
I just assumed they were ick (ie. too weak to bully or dominate - otherwise they'd do that instead of contemplate abstract ideas).
What
Good video. The problem is that the intellect does not equal wisdom. So philosophers can be lone thinkers as much as they want but at some point they'll have to live life to grow in wisdom.
Instead of avoiding major facets of it.
Heartbreak, loss of loved ones, betrayal, brotherhood, overcoming fears, mastery of a skill are examples of things that give wisdom.
Thinking about life won't give as much wisdom as just living it fully.
Instead many phillsophers choose to live in their heads and see reality through the mental models they have crafted. Dostoevsky wrote a lot about such types.
While reality can never be reduced to a mental model.
This trap is infamous in religious and spiritual traditions.
I'm not sure if I agree with you. How would you define "the intellect" and what is your definition of "wisdom" ?
@@stoicepictetus3875 The mind. The faculty within that produces thoughts.
The understanding of how to best live life.
I don't believe you.
What people are missing is that philosophy never existed without logic and maths. You would not be allowed to Plato's academy without fluency in all contemporary maths.
Some lazy people just frequently try to call themselves philosophers while they can't even be bothered to learn formal logic.
In modern times, one should not be allowed to study philosophy without knowledge of higher mathematics and the latter should be strictly connected to the course. There is no philosophy without strict methods of evaluation.
just who do you think you are? you think these so-called philosophers have absolutely no life experience and live entirely within their heads? what a patronizing and ridiculous statement.
and nihilism is the the universe's betrayal of that love for wisdom and ultimate truth
Woman will hold you back
As if men didn't hold women back!
did ai write the script? just from the first 14 seconds
Bro, AI did the script the images and the voice. It's 100% boneless content.
dead internet becoming true
How did you recognize AI in the script beside the images? The script sound like a men full of resentment, hate AND use useless words like "so when..." This video Is just an opinion of a petty person.
Solitude is the Abode of the Gods, until you fall in Love, and then you join the Hell-Fire-Club.
We get to watch award winning demon bukkake shows and s&m clubs at least
All the good stuff 👍
A certain scene from the shining comes to mind when I read the thumbnail.
On one hand, this is definitely the incel side of philsophy, on the other, its kinda true
Reading through this comment section, I’m confused as to why modern men are confused about why they don’t have a girlfriend.
"Women aren't worth my time" and in the next breath: "why won't they give me the time of day?
@ pretty much
This was written by A.i
Quoting "Bone Tomahawk"
- Smart men dont get married.
Neither do smart women.
Its something akin to,get married and love your wife with all you got but if marriage is not for you,love Christ with all you've got.
Nah. I’m good.
Why Christ? Why not one of other thousands of Gods?
Oh no, AI content. Here we are.
But atleast its spitting facts
Finally…some understands me 🥹
Your description relies on the notion that it is a "choice" made freely by the individuals in question. It isn't
even though i choose to remain single but i dont hate women. infact i like their company. this comment section seems like confession room for Unlaid people.
This kind of content tends to attract this kind of people. Contents about men also have similar comments.
Never thought of it, its true. Ive never seen a married philosopher. Also, i remember watching red pill content once when someone said if you having a conversation and want to women to go elsewhere without insulting them, switch the conversation to philosophy and watch how all the women disappear. Now the math is complete. 1+1=2
Solution: Marry a woman who is also a philosopher!
Not too many that fits that criteria. If men were to just focus on a woman that is philosophical and nothing else, that is slim. Add in all the other things that make up a pleasant woman, and you are looking at the good’ol 1% of women.
It’s a tough world out there.
@@halcyon_official952 Yep
Are more than one percent of men philosophers? 😂
@@valerietaylor9615 moving the goal post is disingenuous. That isn’t the argument here. Being triggered doesn’t get you anywhere. Think critically.
Maybe most philosophers don't attract girls, why blame women?
they dont make no bread. chicks dont want a broke boi
@@deathandrebirth-y8x women don't work? That's statistically false. There are lazy women, true, but there are lazy men too, and they don't represent the majority hence your generalization is invalid.
And not wanting a broke guy is good - this is why historically the groom pays dowry to prove financial capacity. No father wants to see his daughter become poor because of a broke dude.
Great minds can see women’s nature. There is a lot of evil in women today, and it’s worse because of a leftist society in the West. However, there is a good in women too obviously. It’s just way more rare in the state of society since they are poisoning every women
So, are you married Joseph?
What? They could buy wifes, there is no comparison with today.
Is this AI?
Sorry, is this a joke? I can't see how this could be meant seriously.
This is nonsense. Oversimplified.
Sounds pretty gay to me
Aye yo, that’s a little gay
Aye yo, you're iq is 60
There is no gay thing involved. Well, so called sexual energy is an energy form which you can use, save or redirect.
Directly using it would be having sexual relationship(s).
Saving or redirecting it would be using your energy as a fuel of what you enjoy: Science, philosophy, art and so on.
After sex men gets physical pleasure but loses energy.
I as an artist use my sexual energy to create my art, I don't hate women, I set my own priorities this way.
There is nothing wrong with having sex/relationships if one priorities those, It's just a matter of taste.
@furiousinsects6386 yep, before puberty I was drawing, building model airplanes, just creative. After puberty hit all i did was beat off and chase girls smoked cigarettes, ect. Pretty much all the bad shyt I did started because of chasing that nut high. Sad but true
@@JoeyB31208 I wish you all the best, be healthy and wealthy! 💜💪
You cant live with them and you cant live without them. Simple saying but it’s true, but honestly if it wasnt for sex and our human need to bond to them most men couldn't even have a woman.
Were generally to independent to need a partner and put up with the nagging and complaing etc
O rizz
This is Ai generated by the way, the comments might be also
Scary times
Your comments make me smile and are abundant in wisdom ❤️ 💙 💜
..............am I a bot or not a bot that is the question 🤔
@@dorkbrandon4422I agree, he doesn't exist, It is an AI generated comment.
I like philosophy but this is kind of cope
No, women may not be so philosophically inclined but it’s also the fact that most people drawn to philosophy are not exactly winning at life to begin with. I guarantee you Espinoza or Nietzsche would have liked female company if they could regularly have it. What we perceive as the more mundane nature of women may just be the fact that they are in some ways more practical than men despite being less logical. Men, especially philosophers, must exert extra effort to avoid letting their logic lead to aberrant philosophies and conclusions less compatible with reality than the superficial vanity of women.
Yet statistics say that man are more practical
No, this take is cope. Marriage =/= sex. Nietzsche would love to get some but I'm pretty sure he wouldn't want the whole baggage.
@@jurassicthunder he literally proposed to a woman multiple times who didn’t even reciprocate his interest
If your philosophy doesn’t reflect reality well enough to have at least a normie level of success at a time when there wasn’t this absurd inflation of women’s value your philosophy is incomplete or you suffer from some kind of dissonance
@@adriantepesut Nietzsche experienced unrequited love, wow, that means he must've been hated by all women in his life as a result of his philosophy! Back to reality, in his early adulthood, he was a successful academic with close ties to one of the most prominent musicians and other cultural figures of his time, which gave him access to fancy parties and meetings. That means, Nietzsche most definitely, at least at one point in his life, experienced a much richer social life than you could ever aspire to have (and I KNOW you aspire to these things as based on what you've just wrote, I KNOW you obsess over social status)
It is only in his later adulthood when he became debilitated from sickness that he became more isolated. His philosophy also reflects this.
And this guy couldn't even be bothered to read Nietzsche's biography, then proceeds to vomit out his opinion. Talks about philosophy aligning with reality like he has a clue. What an absolutely worthless individual.
@@gumis123PL I didn’t say he was a social reject
Having a good social life does not mean you aren’t a pathetic simp for women
And proposing multiple times to a woman who doesn’t reciprocate your interest is pathetic and indicates some dissonance between Nietzsche and his philosophy
I am not big into status nor do I even claim to be some kind of chad, but even today the least a guy can do is not be a pathetic simp for women not interested in them which is especially true for someone of Nietzsche’s higher status who furthermore lived in a time where men still benefited from the fact the internet didn’t exist and that women weren’t sexually liberated
Not even saying he should have been some kind of chad, just that he should have experienced at least a normie level of success with women especially in light of what you said about his status
Even if I were completely wrong about Nietzsche my main point is in response to this video that seems to be trying to suggest philosophers are too high and mighty for women when I’m saying that’s cope; most philosophers would love female companionship but struggle like a vast majority of men and that something about women’s social sensitivity and intuition counteracts the tendency men have to use their superior logic to follow certain premises incompatible with reality too far
I suppose what’s even worse than simping is defending a man who’s simping as you are doing because I pointed out this more embarrassing moment in Nietzsche’s life which is undeniably pathetic. I like Nietzsche but simping is pathetic no matter who does it but Nietzsche furthermore had the insight to rationally perceive the contrasting wills between all men and women yet still gave a woman that kind of power over him without any reciprocated investment from her
Philosophy isn’t very attractive
Finally someone said it.
Why are you here then? Enjoying suffering yourself? 😂😂😂
A man is half. Without woman, you may live long and happy, but you’ve tackled nothing, engaged nothing, solved nothing. A game of Solitaire. Hardly a life of intellectual pursuit.
Thank you for your bloviating bullshit! 😂