Now, i'm back to see one of your older clip, 3060 ti vs 1080 ti. 3060 ti outperform 1080 ti in 4k in every game with lower power consumption. So 4060 ti is overpriced and too weak 👎
Can I ask where you buy your cards from, I redid your benchmarks in my own rig (4060 ti with an i7 12700f) and I'm getting much more fps than what is shown, like alot more. I bought mine from best buy. Edit: the games I redid your benchmarks on are Hogwarts, RDR2, and The Witcher 3
I bet your 2080 ti won't have the same fps as shown on the video. He tested it with I9-13900K so I am pretty sure the fps is much worse than shown on the video.
@@argon1345nah 4070 ti lower than 3090 ti in performances and have half of vram not worth at all lol. 7900xt is better than 3090 ti and have just 4gb vram less that its so worth bro.
5 years and two gens later 2080 Ti still very relevant. Impressive. If you can accept below Ultra you'd be cracking 60fps on these games easy. Even at 1440p.
Why is everybody focused on how good the 2080 Ti holds up, rather than asking the more obvious question, why a significantly newer and more expensive card, performs worse!
@@skynetintex5878 Hää? but that's the way it's always been! 2080ti release 2018 first price between 1350€ and 1550€ 4060ti July 18, 2023 at 3 p.m for 545€. why should a 450€ graphics card be faster than a 1350€ Graphic card? Sorry, but that's rubbish. this has always been the case for 20 years
ehh 2080ti still has dlss, shouldnt buy either card for 4k 120hz neither will be able to hit 120fps in 4k plus both have display port and most people dont play on tvs they play on monitors which have display port. powerdraw doesnt matter an extra 100 watts an hour if you played 2 hours a day for an entire month is about 1-2 cents extra by me so maybe a few dollars a month where you wouldn't notice. thats at 10 cents a kwh even at 50 cents a kwh you wouldnt notice the 5 cents per hour being used. for 2 hours of gaming a day. when upgrading never side grade unless you have to because you can afford better and a new game just wont physically run on a new game ex alan wake 2 not running on a card without mesh shaders but 2080ti has meshshaders and thats going to be the new standard so it should not be a problem.
@@Cygnus-Phi playing on? high/ultra will get you like 40-50 fps. this is unacceptable. i got my 1080ti and i def dont have to upgrade in the next 2 years. you do though, sooner than you think lol
@@deathrager2404 i5-8400 on a 1440P monitor. It works just fine for the games I play (mostly MMO and RPG) and I don't use ultra settings, it doesn't get silly high fps but then silly high fps is largely silly and meaningless. I've not had a reason to upgrade just yet but Starfield and CP77 DLC might change that.
@DR-cl5jm huh? it has the same power draw as a 3090 around 340-360 watts thats bad power consumption. a rx 6800xt undervolted or a rtx 4070 do the trick
bottom line is the 4060ti is producing the same fps and gaming experience of a 2080ti while running 110w on avg less , with over 1000mhz faster clock speeds . as the owner of 2 2080ti hybrids , thats impressive . yeah the fps are the same , but the power draw is crazy. this video is kinda biased in its presentation . It's not always about fps .... you could run 2 4060ti's in your system for the same power draw as one 2080ti
@@jmangames5562 Bottom line is the RTX 4060 Ti is just a refreshed version of the 2080 Ti with less power usage and faster clock speeds, not to mention (at least where i got it) cheaper with longer lasting driver support. if you do not already have a 2080 (Ti or not) you should get the RTX 4060 Ti if your picking between the two
Good. If your building a new pc 4060ti is better since it offers similar raw performance, has DLSS 3 & frame generation and consumes much less power, but if you already have a 2080ti upgrading is going to be a waste.
You know the funny thing is the 4060 Ti 16gb gives about 2-5fps more than the 8gb model which would mean the 16gb model would be like the 2080 Ti but uses a lot less power.
Correct me if I'm wrong but you are not using dlls3 at any moment with the 4060 ti, if that's the case is a really good option to play any game at good quality for the price
Worse? In some games it performs better, others worse but this doesn't mean that it performs worse. Did you even considered the consumption and temp? 4060ti consume nearly 50% lower watt than 2080ti while being similar in performance. It is not worse, his only issue is that the price is not good for that range card but definitely it is a better option than a 2080ti.
@@Kilson55the issue is the 4060 Ti 8GB shouldn’t even be launched. It’s a $400 card that can’t even run 1080p max without having vram issues. 16GB should have been the only card and marketed as a 4060. Every card is upsold a tier by Nvidia.
@person1745 it's hard to believe that 8gb VRAM are an issue in 1080p considering that the 3070ti has the same VRAM and it is a card used in 1440p too. I think that 8gb VRAM are a limit only in 2160p and for some games in 1440p but for the 1080p they are still fine. I'm saying this monitoring the VRAM used in most games using a 3080 12gb in 1440p, actually only Total War Warhammer 3 and the last of us part 1 used 10gb in 1440p, but I know that the last of us 1 received an update that decreased a bit the VRAM used. Could be probably more games that in 1440p use more than 8gb but we were talking for 1080p which, I will say again, 8gb VRAM are fine.
Hol' up... 8gb keeping up pace with a 11gb card at 1440p???? I thought 8gb wasn't enough like people have been screaming about these last few months... People be crazy.
I mean if you think about it from how the generation and series have been done. a 2 generation newer card 60TI series SHOULD perform on par with the 2 generation older 80TI.
Atleast I haven't experienced a single crash on mine, and I've been playing these new AAA titles at 3440x1440 resolution high settings. Don't let media fool you about 8GB not being enough lol. It's good then buy your new GPU after 5 years when you actually experienced crashes lol
what where the settings for 4060 ti? i played cyberpunk on my daughter's computer at 1440p high settings w/o ray tracing and got around a consistent 55+ fps with her 4060 ti before DLSS 3 lol after dlss and frame generation would get like close to 90 fps my old 2080 ti average was around 60 with DLSS
@@jonelbondyingnuezca742 Basic 4060ti cost $400+ USD. Used 2080ti cost about $250USD. You're getting 11GB VRAM, SImilar performance for less money. Anyone I've bought used cards from let me test them out thoroughly. I've bought many used cards and haven't got a lemon yet (knock on wood). I Picked up a 3060 for $140USD and 3080ti for $430 this year. I push them pretty hard and neither go above 65 degrees. If I was going to buy a new card I'd skip Nvidia anyway and buy a new 6700XT for low to mid systems and 7800XT for mid to high end systems.
In 2 years the 3060ti almost beat him. After 4 years the next 60ti still lose... The 4060ti is just a bad joke! With a 24% cut to the rtx 40 shaders capacity, this is a rtx 4050. The non ti 4060 is a fkn gtx 4660 series or worse, with yours 17% cut.
This is what Nvidia should have done with the 40 Series GPUs from the getgo.. unfortunately its leveraging its monopoly Below 1080p Tier GPU * 4060 - $250 1080p to 1440p Tier GPUs * 4060Ti 8GB - $300 * 4060 Ti 16GB - $350 * 4070 - $450 1440p to 2160p Tier GPUs * 4070 Ti - $600 * 4080 - $800 * 4080 Ti - $1000 (if released) * 4090 - $1500 * 4090 Ti - $2000 (if released)
Considering that the 2080Ti is more than competitive with the 3070, it makes sense that the 4060Ti is basically a downgrade. A solid reference here is 80Ti class usually matches up with next gen 70 class, and gen after 60/60ti class. 1080Ti was competitive vs 2070S, still competitive vs 3060/Ti. If it weren't for RT and a few other architecture tweaks, the 1080Ti would still be comp with the 4060/Ti
I appreciate you doing 1440p testing which shows the 4060ti is more than capable. Do you have a video that you do 1080p testing with these two GPUs? 1080p high not ultra. 😁
This looks like a stock FE card and therefore is massively sandbagged by nVidia. My copy runs at 2050mhz/8000 too and in benchmarks is as much as 15% faster than FE cards in Timespy and a few games with a power limit set to 330W. If nvidia had competition then they could have made a card 20% faster than they did initially. This is if they paired it with faster 16Gbps GDDR6 (like the 2080super) and a full 384-bit bus (like the titan RTX) and a 350W power target. All of this makes the 4060ti even more of a clown show then it already is along with the 3070/3070ti , and 16GB of VRAM only slightly fixes things.
Turing really has held up well. If you can live without Ray Tracing and appreciate DLSS then a 2080Ti is still a good 1440p or 4K GPU. It is power hungry though.
The 8 gig 4060 wont have enough VRAM to really do DLSS, although the 16 gig model certainly does. In fact even w/o DLSS the 16 is marginally better FPS than 8, Daniel Owen did show some tests and its remarkable both the 4060Ti models have same hardware other than VRAM allotment. Issue at the moment is price its too close to other better video cards in price, there are better options even at the same price.
2080 ti gains about 5% over the 4060 ti when you go for 4k. Everyone is stuck on this old idea that buying a mid-range GPU means 4k is off the table but I disagree. 4k 144hz is pretty equal to 1440 240 as far as price. 4k 144hz monitors can be found as cheap as these GPUs so it is completely reasonable to have this matchup these days. Dlss on 4k runs like 1440p but looks like 1800p so there is def value in having 4k with a weaker GPU. Another thing.. 4k is useful for far more than just clarity in games so if you aren't super competitive.. get 4k 144 over 1440 240 imo
eh on such cards you neither run 1440p 240 hz nor 4k 120 hz even with dlss or fsr. 4k on a 27 monitor is a waste anyway, 1440p 120-144hz is the target here.
Oh and I got my 4k 144hz g7 from microcenter for $270 including 2 year protection plan. Why someone would buy a $500 GPU and run 1440p when that is an option is beyond my scope of understanding. Different strokes.
@@christophermullins7163 my guy my 4070 doesnt reach these fps you stated with dlss and even FG on. And every benchmark from like gamers nexus shows it aint happening. A 4060ti is a 1440p 60-80fps card at most in todays games
@@theplayerofus319 do you know what percentage of gamers play 2023 titles and which ones play older competitive games? If you know the stats you'd understand that 2023 ultra gaming is not what most people are doing.
Which one will you buy when you build new pc if these cards has similiar price?in my country cheapest old 2080ti cost around 390$ and cheapest new 4060ti cost around 430$
Keep in mind you'd be buying an old, used, dusty piece of hardware that has double the power consumption for more or less the same performance as a brand new card. Go with the 4060 ti
It has more vram which could last you 2 more years before it gets outdated for triple a games(very few play them nowadays) and it could last eSports games 5 more years.
1080p would be more CPU bound in terms of results. 1440p-4K in testing if you're testing GPUs basically make it more GPU bound. That's why he tests at 1440p & 4K for GPUs.
Overall 4060ti is better, but 2080ti is impressive. Raw performance wise there similar with the 4060ti winning in some games and the 2080ti winning in others, but what makes the 4060ti is DLSS 3 & Frame generation, way better power efficiency, better temps, and it will receive driver support for longer. Not worth upgrading to a 4060ti if you have a 2080ti.
People are joking, but I'm still impressed that 60 ti class card is equal with or even beats the flagship of 2 generations ago, all of this while being a gimped card and at almost half the power draw. Imagine if this card had 12gb VRAM on at least 192bit bus width, sold at 350-400$ MSRP.
The thing is, the 3060 ti that was a generation behind closed up 90% of the performance difference. That to me was the impressive part. It was also 30% faster than the 2060 Super, which it replaces. 4060 Ti isn’t impressive because it literally is a 4060 upsold as a 4060 Ti. Samsung 8nm to TSMC 4nm is a huge improvement, they could easily improve performance by 30% and still have better power efficiency.
Don't trust everything you see on the internet, just like this video. the rtx 4060 ti is getting a bit less fps because this youtuber messed with the bios settings and in-game settings. If he didn't mess with them, then the rtx 4060 ti would perform a little bit better. But even if you still have an rtx 2080 ti and thinking about upgrading, then you should probably upgrade to the 4070 super or 4070 ti.
Performance is great at those power consumption levels. Still a new PSU would only be about 100-200 if it wasn't. Not worth the upgrade from a 2080Ti most owners already have a 750W + PSU anyways.. only worth upgrading to a 4080Ti for at least + 50% performance.
Im excited for AMD 8000 APUs, they're going to eliminate mid-tier gaming cards. With expectations of GPU pricing rising once again with AI demands, APU will be more critical than ever.
What do you mean with APUs? You don't mean the g CPUs right? Because CPUs like the Ryzen 5 5600g aren't even close to an actual graphics card so I guess you mean other APUs?
Just seen it, seems interesting, but I'm not sure if that's just rumors and could end up being wrong. Also, even if it ends up being 100% true, there'd still be the issue that they would eat up their own GPU sales which can't be in their own interest. So I'd suppose they wouldn't exactly price those cheaply then
@@Nahtotter did you read what i said or do you not realise fsr upscaling and fsr frame gen are two different things? I said, fsr frame gen is as good as dlss frame gen
Conclusion: Never "upgrade" from xx80 Ti to zz60 Ti series, because it's not an apple-to-apple upgrade...it's downgrade even. 😂 Should be from xx80 Ti to zz80 Ti. That's what we called REAL upgrade!
I got my 2080ti "broken" From a warehouse guy that was gonna throw it away. Rebuilt the card, still screams today. Its great to see 4060ti getting performance of a 2080ti for $380. Just got a friend to pick up one of these cards and i'm excited to test it with them =) It shows generational improvements are happening and the prices are falling.
no , what it shows that they've been sitting on their *ss for the last 6 years , relying on AI to do the work For Them , which gets you performance FROM 6 years ago ... today ... relying on Frame Generation and DLSS to give us fake frames ... extra fps , without it ... the gpu just has the same fps ... so what did they make ... , Really ... ?
@@JanM2 5060 Ti should have 16GB, and 4060 12Gb. They release a very bad generation, and after that another bad one, but better, and all people will say that NVIDIA is doing well, because they will re-release 4070 (which is actually a real 4060 Ti) called the 5060 with a price of $350. We have already seen this with RTX 30 generation, after the terrible RTX 20 (3060 12Gb = 2060 Super with 12Gb, useless 3070 8Gb and 3080 10Gb 🤡).
@@GLadiator.RTX 20 and RTX 30 aren't the same architecture so I don't think RTX 2060 super is 3060 12GB and yeah this generation is just bad they uptier most of their card 4070Ti should be 4070 4070 should be 4060Ti 4060Ti should be 4060 4060 should be 4050
@@Blaczek297yeah but it is not worth that much considering this is desktop graphics card so power supply is not big of issue you just need to buy power supply 100w more. It's not something like your gonna use them with laptop that's for sure.
@@theplayerofus319 not by much. 7900xt goes for 850 euros While the 4080 goes for 1250 euros. That's a 400 euros for the same raster performance. Yes you have dlss but let's be honest, if you get a card for 1300 euros and you use dlss well that's basically a waste of money.
@@jonelbondyingnuezca742 sucks where? Gaming? Nvidia sucks because they use dlss and frame gen.... While AMD fights with raster. I got myself the 7900xt for 850 euros. My friend has the 4080 and he told me that the 7900xt is better for price because he paid 1250 euro and that's 400 euros more for almost no benefits. The 6700xt pulse is now 350 euros while the 4060ti is 460 euros The 6700xt kills the 4060ti while being 100 euros cheaper. AMD sucks? It seems Nvidia sucks 😂 I talk facts bro... Wake up ... Stop being a slave mind
Would love to see 4060 TI 16GB vs 2080 TI 11 GB comparison. I am curious to see if the 16GB VRAM version may help in VRAM heavy unoptimized games (e.g. TLOU and Hogwarts Legacy)
@capsloct4863 you drunk? The 4060ti 16gb costs 500. For that you can get a rx 6800 16gb that conplelty destroys the 4060ti and is also super power efficent. No reason to buy a 4060ti exept being clueless or a fanboy really
@capsloct4863 the rx 6800 destroys a 3070ti in raster. Bro a 4060ti is a 1080p card why even bither with raytracing in such a low resolutuin. And it draws 50 watts more big deal 😅 funny how you mention clock speed which tells nothing of Performance. You kinda exposed yourself there. Again peoole who buy a 4060ti are suckers for nvida, every tech reviewer says that. Imaging paying 500 for a 1080p card ahahahahha. But hey ypu be happy with that and i play 1440p with my rx 6800 undeevolted to 150 watts and 20% more fps but hey at least ypu have the nvida logo on ypur card 🌚
@capsloct4863 you must be smoking crack, first of all ray tracing on a 4060ti is pointless, even in 1080p , if you want good ray tracing in 1080p you need a 4070 The 4060ti cannot even beat a 6700xt in performance much less the rx 6800. Rx 6800 sells for 479$ and has 16gbvram the 4060ti 16gb sells for 500$ and has much less raster performance, the difference is night and day in performance
@capsloct4863 NVidia cards aren't worth it unless you have the money for a 4090. The new driver that AMD just released makes the 7900 XTX faster than the 4080 and the 7900 XTX is usually cheaper
Rtx 2080 ti slightly perform better then rtx 4060 ti but the difference between graphic power wattage is huge , rtx 4060 ti performs surprisingly better at this power comsuption
So, current generation entry level gaming card (399$) is at the same level than 2 generation old supercard (999$). What's not to like? Well, the pricing of the more powerful models, that's what. 4070 ti has more power, but it's MSRP of 799$ is absolutely bonkers in comparison. Well, I'll be better off waiting for the 5060 ti to replace my 2080 super, then...
Considering it's 2 gens old, having just 8gb instead of 11gb at 400€ is extremely bad. The 3060 offered the same performance as the 1080 ti + 12gb after all at just 330€ and even this product was kinda disappointing. So I guess that makes the 4060 ti one of the worst value products Nvidia has brought out so far.
This is exactly on par for what the results should be. I have an RTX 2080 t.i. and it performs about as good as a 3070 or 3070ti. It's funny how people get on here and complain and don't know what they are talking about. The RTX 2080 t.i. was 30-40% faster than the 1080ti depending on the game you were playing. It is in no way a bad GPU.
That's why we always say competition is important , no one should buy 4080 cuz u have 7900 xtx cheaper, have more performances and have more vram so its great!. and no one should buy 4070 ti cuz u have 7900 xt cheaper, have more performance and have more vram, lol. Cant wait for 7800 xt and 7700 xt, hope for amd to defeat 4070 and 4060 ti, to make nvidiot know their fault.
This isnt unexpected. It not a rule, but generally, a card matches one level lower per genration. All things being equal, a 2080 matches a 3070, both match a 4060. So far, nothing unexpected. What IS unexpected is for a goddamned 4060 to cost as mich as a 2080! *And* for it to pull down as much power, usually the same level across generations also uses less power. i.e., a 2080 and 4060 would perform the same, but the 4k drawing 100w less, or whatever.
3000 series were a way larger step than usual. Amd is loosig on raytracing, they need to work on that. Then you'll be right. 60's cards were always the "student's cards" and it delivers it.
@@rx10it brought RT cores(and still has quite good RT performance) and DLSS, it aged like fine wine, unlike the 1080ti that struggles running dx12 games now on the hardware level
You should include DLSS 3 vs DLSS 2 with ray tracing in these tests. Since at this point everyone knows how bad the rasterization performance of the 4060 and 4060 Ti is.
That sucks tho, but the main thing of series 40 is the DLSS 3.0 so yeah right now it can be easily beated but if you put the DLSS 3.0 on a serie 40 the 4060 TI outplay the 2080 ti
If i had one i would stil use the rtx 2080 ti for me is a beter gpu. But i must be good with my used rtx 2060 from evga it costed me 137€ boughted at the end of last year.
Well thats the idea behind it. I have the cheapest RTX 4060 Ti in my PC from Gainward, Ghost edition coupled with i5 12400f and 32 gb RAM and I have around 80-90 fps@1080p with full ultra and technology preview "Path Tracing". @telquin6974
@@Hehhhhhhhavvvv after patches not so vram hungry loke ratcher and clank, way less Vram intensvie,but it's also have problems with CPU,ram and vram usage like many ps 5 ports like spider man, where vram usage is higher and higher when u playing for no reason and in spider man u must have fast CPU for avoiding bottleneck especially on 1080 p, Ratcher and clank looks like cartoon and use 13 gb of vram,because game coded with ass
@@rick39413 when the last of us launched I remember my 3080TI and Core i7 13700k was getting around 40 fps in 2k res bro 🗿 Games these days are terrible 💔
Un amigo ha comprado una 3080 y yo le he cambiado mi ventus 3060 12gb por su anterior evga 2080Ti black, con ella habrá jugado 10 horas como máximo, ( le sobra el dinero y compra por puro hobby).... Ahora me importa una mierda el dlss3, 4, 5 o 25...solo activo 1440p, ajustes al máximo y a disfrutar 🤷.
Great, the 4060 Ti can match a 80 class card from 2 generations behind... and let's also not forget the RTX 20 series was also an underwhelming generation since the 2080 Ti was only 20% faster than the 1080 Ti. So in reality, the 4060 Ti is 20% faster than the GTX 1080 Ti.
that perf difference is close, more like about ~%25, he did a video on 1080ti vs 4060ti a little over a month ago, if you want to watch the name of it is: "GTX 1080 Ti vs RTX 4060 Ti - Test in 10 Games"
@@thewakly Sorry, I used TechPowerUp as a reference but still, it's pathetic. The 4060 Ti should smash the 1080 Ti in fact it should be comparable to a 3080.
Who cares about it being current gen the 4060ti is around the same or worse than the 2080ti just because it has the performance equivalent to an older card doesn't mean its older.... The ps5 pro isnt an older gen
Games :
Hogwarts Legacy - 0:20 - gvo.deals/TG3HogwartsLegacy
CYBERPUNK 2077 - 1:24 - gvo.deals/TestingGamesCP2077
Forza Horizon 5 - 2:35 - gvo.deals/TestingGamesForza5
Hitman 3 - 3:43 - gvo.deals/TestingGamesHitman3
Remnant 2 - 4:44
The Last of Us Part I - 5:39
Red Dead Redemption 2 - 6:36 - gvo.deals/TestingGamesRDR2
Resident Evil 4 - 7:50
Microsoft Flight Simulator - 8:52 - gvo.deals/TestingGamesMFS20
The Witcher 3 - 9:51 - gvo.deals/TestingGamesWitcher
System:
Windows 11
Core i9-13900K - bit.ly/3SgY3xf
ASUS ROG Strix Z790-E Gaming - bit.ly/3scEZpc
G.SKILL Trident Z5 32GB DDR5 6000MHz - bit.ly/3XlBGdU
CPU Cooler - Arctic Liquid Freezer II 420 - bit.ly/3Pn2xVx
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8GB - bit.ly/3WvSYou
GeForce RTX 2080 Ti 11GB - bit.ly/3xey3sv
SSD - 2xSAMSUNG 970 EVO M.2 2280 1TB - bit.ly/2NmWeQe
Power Supply CORSAIR RM850i 850W - bit.ly/3i2VoGI
Now, i'm back to see one of your older clip, 3060 ti vs 1080 ti. 3060 ti outperform 1080 ti in 4k in every game with lower power consumption. So 4060 ti is overpriced and too weak 👎
Hey testing, please test multiplayer of Max Payne 3, it's so fun and still played
Can I ask where you buy your cards from, I redid your benchmarks in my own rig (4060 ti with an i7 12700f) and I'm getting much more fps than what is shown, like alot more. I bought mine from best buy.
Edit: the games I redid your benchmarks on are Hogwarts, RDR2, and The Witcher 3
In short, if you have an RTX 2080 Ti it's only worth upgrading to an RTX 4070 Ti or better.
no, it is only worth to upgrade to a 4080 4090 preferably as that is over twice the performance and twice vram
@@manuelmunguia616 if someone bought a 2080 Ti, this guys has money to buy a 4070 ti or over
I bet your 2080 ti won't have the same fps as shown on the video. He tested it with I9-13900K so I am pretty sure the fps is much worse than shown on the video.
4070Ti = 3090Ti
@@argon1345nah 4070 ti lower than 3090 ti in performances and have half of vram not worth at all lol. 7900xt is better than 3090 ti and have just 4gb vram less that its so worth bro.
5 years and two gens later 2080 Ti still very relevant. Impressive. If you can accept below Ultra you'd be cracking 60fps on these games easy. Even at 1440p.
Why is everybody focused on how good the 2080 Ti holds up, rather than asking the more obvious question, why a significantly newer and more expensive card, performs worse!
i mean it was top tier gpu,it better does
Eh? 2080 Ti was far more expensive than a 4060 Ti@@skynetintex5878
High settings does 70fps to 80fps in most games,ive bought a used 2080ti for £100 less of what a 4060ti would be
@@skynetintex5878 Hää? but that's the way it's always been! 2080ti release 2018 first price between 1350€ and 1550€ 4060ti July 18, 2023 at 3 p.m for 545€. why should a 450€ graphics card be faster than a 1350€ Graphic card?
Sorry, but that's rubbish. this has always been the case for 20 years
I like the new summary screen after each game test!
Reasons to sidegrade to 4060ti:
1. DLSS
2. HDMI 2.1 output (to your 4k120-hdr oled tv)
3. Power draw
ehh 2080ti still has dlss, shouldnt buy either card for 4k 120hz neither will be able to hit 120fps in 4k plus both have display port and most people dont play on tvs they play on monitors which have display port. powerdraw doesnt matter an extra 100 watts an hour if you played 2 hours a day for an entire month is about 1-2 cents extra by me so maybe a few dollars a month where you wouldn't notice. thats at 10 cents a kwh even at 50 cents a kwh you wouldnt notice the 5 cents per hour being used. for 2 hours of gaming a day. when upgrading never side grade unless you have to because you can afford better and a new game just wont physically run on a new game ex alan wake 2 not running on a card without mesh shaders but 2080ti has meshshaders and thats going to be the new standard so it should not be a problem.
@@zackmandarino1021 few dollars? bruh, I could buy RGB lights every few months with those savings to increase fps down the line
For a new build the 4060 ti... For a upgrade with a 2080 TI it doesn't... At least the 4070.
DLSS is a gimmick.
HDMI is almost pointless.
Irrelevant.
Also, the 4060 is a cpu; NOT a gpu. lmao
@@zackmandarino1021 Agreed.
Good to see Turing architecture cards still holding up with current games.
Ampere too
I still have trouble convincing myself that upgrading my 1070Ti is a good idea atm.
@@Cygnus-PhiSame I have a 2060 and I don’t think it’s worth it
@@Cygnus-Phi playing on? high/ultra will get you like 40-50 fps. this is unacceptable. i got my 1080ti and i def dont have to upgrade in the next 2 years. you do though, sooner than you think lol
@@deathrager2404 i5-8400 on a 1440P monitor. It works just fine for the games I play (mostly MMO and RPG) and I don't use ultra settings, it doesn't get silly high fps but then silly high fps is largely silly and meaningless. I've not had a reason to upgrade just yet but Starfield and CP77 DLC might change that.
The power consumption difference for almost the same fps is impressive.
If i need low consuption, just need shutdown the pc. We need performance!! 3060ti have same fps. Rtx40 is a trash expensive!!
@DR-cl5jm huh? it has the same power draw as a 3090 around 340-360 watts thats bad power consumption. a rx 6800xt undervolted or a rtx 4070 do the trick
@douglasvinicius912 did I stutter? What you said was irrelevant.
You found a good and honest reason to justify the scam 😁
@circumcisio10 another one who can't read.
They should just remove the 8G varient and sell only 4060 TI 16G for $400
bottom line is the 4060ti is producing the same fps and gaming experience of a 2080ti while running 110w on avg less , with over 1000mhz faster clock speeds .
as the owner of 2 2080ti hybrids , thats impressive . yeah the fps are the same , but the power draw is crazy. this video is kinda biased in its presentation . It's not always about fps .... you could run 2 4060ti's in your system for the same power draw as one 2080ti
No they don´t support SLI.
Bottom line is 5$ more per year difference in power consumption. If that is why you buy a GPU you shouldn't be gaming!
@@jmangames5562 Bottom line is the RTX 4060 Ti is just a refreshed version of the 2080 Ti with less power usage and faster clock speeds, not to mention (at least where i got it) cheaper with longer lasting driver support. if you do not already have a 2080 (Ti or not) you should get the RTX 4060 Ti if your picking between the two
@@8iosatlost209it’s called a metaphor…
its amazing that what was a beast back then is being matched by "budget" level hardware these days
But 5 freakin years later!
@@crackingspace thats not a long time
@@alfrdhrnndz if 5 years is not a long time in tech the i don't think what is
@@crackingspace ok but look at the power draw
@@crackingspace compare their msrp too
Am sticking to my 2080 ti…I tot of trading it for 4060 but after this comparison I change my mind
Nice.
Good. If your building a new pc 4060ti is better since it offers similar raw performance, has DLSS 3 & frame generation and consumes much less power, but if you already have a 2080ti upgrading is going to be a waste.
@@Bob-c7u5w DLSS 3 & frame generation are gimmicks, bro.
@@IncognitoActivado you've never used it. I'm speaking from experience because I actually used it and it works.
Dude you have a beast GPU, keep it in good condition to prolong its lifespan. Who knows how long Turing cards will be around. 2080Ti has aged so well.
Very impressive from the 4050!
You mean the 4040 Super
@capsloct4863gt 4010
i love my 2080Ti gpu! i still use it till this day with gaming. i never had any problems with AAA gaming.
You know the funny thing is the 4060 Ti 16gb gives about 2-5fps more than the 8gb model which would mean the 16gb model would be like the 2080 Ti but uses a lot less power.
it's still surprising how a 60ti class card cant beat an 80ti from TWO GENERATIONS AGO.
You do realise 3060ti to already did like.... 95-98% of that?
More surprising to see current gen 60ti struggle to gain anything over last gen 60ti
lol it cant! this is too funny people believe this.. A 2080 ti will game in 4k and smoke the the 4060ti.
@@azjeep26 my point is, the previous generation's 3060ti could smoke a 1080ti
You realize the 3060 ti is already almost a 4 year old card now & no one in their right mind should be buying one for more than $225
Tell me the power draw and core counts... This Is like said my new midrange Mustang Is not faster than a Shelby Mustang from 2014.
Correct me if I'm wrong but you are not using dlls3 at any moment with the 4060 ti, if that's the case is a really good option to play any game at good quality for the price
Thank you bro. I've been waiting a long time for this comparison.
4060 ti is a joke at this price and it performs worse than a 4 years old card
5 yr old
Worse? In some games it performs better, others worse but this doesn't mean that it performs worse. Did you even considered the consumption and temp? 4060ti consume nearly 50% lower watt than 2080ti while being similar in performance. It is not worse, his only issue is that the price is not good for that range card but definitely it is a better option than a 2080ti.
@@Kilson55the issue is the 4060 Ti 8GB shouldn’t even be launched. It’s a $400 card that can’t even run 1080p max without having vram issues.
16GB should have been the only card and marketed as a 4060. Every card is upsold a tier by Nvidia.
@person1745 it's hard to believe that 8gb VRAM are an issue in 1080p considering that the 3070ti has the same VRAM and it is a card used in 1440p too. I think that 8gb VRAM are a limit only in 2160p and for some games in 1440p but for the 1080p they are still fine. I'm saying this monitoring the VRAM used in most games using a 3080 12gb in 1440p, actually only Total War Warhammer 3 and the last of us part 1 used 10gb in 1440p, but I know that the last of us 1 received an update that decreased a bit the VRAM used. Could be probably more games that in 1440p use more than 8gb but we were talking for 1080p which, I will say again, 8gb VRAM are fine.
@@Kilson55 Your nuanced take generally doesn't sit well with the copy/paste brigade, more so because a majority of them are AMD fanboys.
What people fail to notice it that the 4060 ti consumes nearly half as much power as the 2080 ti for similar results.
When parents still pay for energy, doesn’t matter, if you pay it comes to your mind
same performance for less money and more v ram... idk sounds better to me
thx..without dlss has same performance...but 4060TI consumes half energy and has dlss 3.5 against dlss 2.0 from 2080TI...
Damn, the 4050ti got some nice power efficiency
What a shame to see a 3 year old card performing better than a new release card😢
We are talking about a 3 year ago top gamma vs an almost new entry-level.
you mean 5 years
Yeah.... the 2080ti is almost 5 years old
and 2nd next gen lol🤣🤣🤣
2080 Ti is almost 5 years old
Hol' up... 8gb keeping up pace with a 11gb card at 1440p???? I thought 8gb wasn't enough like people have been screaming about these last few months... People be crazy.
Amd fan boy mouthpieces that only listen to streamers for their opinions
I mean if you think about it from how the generation and series have been done. a 2 generation newer card 60TI series SHOULD perform on par with the 2 generation older 80TI.
That's disappointing to say the least... 4060 ti with 8GB is a disastrous combo
This performance and vram is garbage after 4 years. Xx60ti would need at least 3080 performance.
Atleast I haven't experienced a single crash on mine, and I've been playing these new AAA titles at 3440x1440 resolution high settings. Don't let media fool you about 8GB not being enough lol.
It's good then buy your new GPU after 5 years when you actually experienced crashes lol
but girls love 8gb and think it's alot tho
8GB is dated 2080ti FTW
@@jake9854 i am using 6 gb just fine and never have issues
what where the settings for 4060 ti? i played cyberpunk on my daughter's computer at 1440p high settings w/o ray tracing and got around a consistent 55+ fps with her 4060 ti before DLSS 3 lol after dlss and frame generation would get like close to 90 fps my old 2080 ti average was around 60 with DLSS
true his fps is wrong
Similar performance at 100 less watts, but you can get a used 2080ti for much less than a 4060 ti
A 2080 ti smokes the 4060ti in 4k these people are crazy they must play in 1080p
Why would I buy an old, outdated, 2nd hand GPU with issues, probably used for Bitcoin mining, no Frame Gen and has no warranty?
@@jonelbondyingnuezca742 Basic 4060ti cost $400+ USD. Used 2080ti cost about $250USD.
You're getting 11GB VRAM, SImilar performance for less money.
Anyone I've bought used cards from let me test them out thoroughly. I've bought many used cards and haven't got a lemon yet (knock on wood). I Picked up a 3060 for $140USD and 3080ti for $430 this year. I push them pretty hard and neither go above 65 degrees.
If I was going to buy a new card I'd skip Nvidia anyway and buy a new 6700XT for low to mid systems and 7800XT for mid to high end systems.
I have an RTX 2080 ti and I don't see the need to upgrade any time soon.
@telquin6974we're getting fsr 3 soon :D
In 2 years the 3060ti almost beat him. After 4 years the next 60ti still lose... The 4060ti is just a bad joke!
With a 24% cut to the rtx 40 shaders capacity, this is a rtx 4050. The non ti 4060 is a fkn gtx 4660 series or worse, with yours 17% cut.
Literally 50% of the power draw .... same performance! That is insane levels of efficiency! Great job NVIDIA!
Agree, the 2080 Ti is great.
5 years later, that's not impressive at all
@@virtualpilgrim8645great 5 years ago
It's -60% less dude 😊
This is what Nvidia should have done with the 40 Series GPUs from the getgo.. unfortunately its leveraging its monopoly
Below 1080p Tier GPU
* 4060 - $250
1080p to 1440p Tier GPUs
* 4060Ti 8GB - $300
* 4060 Ti 16GB - $350
* 4070 - $450
1440p to 2160p Tier GPUs
* 4070 Ti - $600
* 4080 - $800
* 4080 Ti - $1000 (if released)
* 4090 - $1500
* 4090 Ti - $2000 (if released)
Considering that the 2080Ti is more than competitive with the 3070, it makes sense that the 4060Ti is basically a downgrade. A solid reference here is 80Ti class usually matches up with next gen 70 class, and gen after 60/60ti class. 1080Ti was competitive vs 2070S, still competitive vs 3060/Ti. If it weren't for RT and a few other architecture tweaks, the 1080Ti would still be comp with the 4060/Ti
I appreciate you doing 1440p testing which shows the 4060ti is more than capable.
Do you have a video that you do 1080p testing with these two GPUs?
1080p high not ultra. 😁
bruh look at the power draw :O
Why is the 2080 Ti's clock speeds that low? Mine out of the box sits at roughly 2100MHz and 7999mhz on the memory clock.
This looks like a stock FE card and therefore is massively sandbagged by nVidia. My copy runs at 2050mhz/8000 too and in benchmarks is as much as 15% faster than FE cards in Timespy and a few games with a power limit set to 330W.
If nvidia had competition then they could have made a card 20% faster than they did initially. This is if they paired it with faster 16Gbps GDDR6 (like the 2080super) and a full 384-bit bus (like the titan RTX) and a 350W power target.
All of this makes the 4060ti even more of a clown show then it already is along with the 3070/3070ti , and 16GB of VRAM only slightly fixes things.
4050Ti pumping out some good performance
4050
@@gramostv_official 4050ti*
4050e
Pass.
Only the performance of a 80 ti of 2 GENs back!
Turing really has held up well. If you can live without Ray Tracing and appreciate DLSS then a 2080Ti is still a good 1440p or 4K GPU. It is power hungry though.
Maybe it is already fair to also add DLSS 3 and 2 comparisons after main test
The 8 gig 4060 wont have enough VRAM to really do DLSS, although the 16 gig model certainly does. In fact even w/o DLSS the 16 is marginally better FPS than 8, Daniel Owen did show some tests and its remarkable both the 4060Ti models have same hardware other than VRAM allotment. Issue at the moment is price its too close to other better video cards in price, there are better options even at the same price.
2080ti is a great card ageless
2080 ti gains about 5% over the 4060 ti when you go for 4k. Everyone is stuck on this old idea that buying a mid-range GPU means 4k is off the table but I disagree. 4k 144hz is pretty equal to 1440 240 as far as price. 4k 144hz monitors can be found as cheap as these GPUs so it is completely reasonable to have this matchup these days. Dlss on 4k runs like 1440p but looks like 1800p so there is def value in having 4k with a weaker GPU. Another thing.. 4k is useful for far more than just clarity in games so if you aren't super competitive.. get 4k 144 over 1440 240 imo
eh on such cards you neither run 1440p 240 hz nor 4k 120 hz even with dlss or fsr. 4k on a 27 monitor is a waste anyway, 1440p 120-144hz is the target here.
@@theplayerofus319 speak for yourself. I have both as well as stronger and weaker GPUs.
Oh and I got my 4k 144hz g7 from microcenter for $270 including 2 year protection plan. Why someone would buy a $500 GPU and run 1440p when that is an option is beyond my scope of understanding. Different strokes.
@@christophermullins7163 my guy my 4070 doesnt reach these fps you stated with dlss and even FG on. And every benchmark from like gamers nexus shows it aint happening. A 4060ti is a 1440p 60-80fps card at most in todays games
@@theplayerofus319 do you know what percentage of gamers play 2023 titles and which ones play older competitive games? If you know the stats you'd understand that 2023 ultra gaming is not what most people are doing.
Which one will you buy when you build new pc if these cards has similiar price?in my country cheapest old 2080ti cost around 390$ and cheapest new 4060ti cost around 430$
Keep in mind you'd be buying an old, used, dusty piece of hardware that has double the power consumption for more or less the same performance as a brand new card. Go with the 4060 ti
It has more vram which could last you 2 more years before it gets outdated for triple a games(very few play them nowadays) and it could last eSports games 5 more years.
Isnt it more realistic to compare at 1080p? Still interesting to see, cheers.
1080p would be more CPU bound in terms of results. 1440p-4K in testing if you're testing GPUs basically make it more GPU bound. That's why he tests at 1440p & 4K for GPUs.
Overall 4060ti is better, but 2080ti is impressive. Raw performance wise there similar with the 4060ti winning in some games and the 2080ti winning in others, but what makes the 4060ti is DLSS 3 & Frame generation, way better power efficiency, better temps, and it will receive driver support for longer. Not worth upgrading to a 4060ti if you have a 2080ti.
becasue of upscale and fake frames generator the game developers and engineer are not like to waste time on any gpu and game performance.😔😔
People are joking, but I'm still impressed that 60 ti class card is equal with or even beats the flagship of 2 generations ago, all of this while being a gimped card and at almost half the power draw. Imagine if this card had 12gb VRAM on at least 192bit bus width, sold at 350-400$ MSRP.
It's a neat reminder. The pricing and marketing for these cards is bullshit, don't get me wrong, but they are impressive technological achievements.
The thing is, the 3060 ti that was a generation behind closed up 90% of the performance difference. That to me was the impressive part. It was also 30% faster than the 2060 Super, which it replaces.
4060 Ti isn’t impressive because it literally is a 4060 upsold as a 4060 Ti.
Samsung 8nm to TSMC 4nm is a huge improvement, they could easily improve performance by 30% and still have better power efficiency.
4060ti better low watt
power assumption is crazily different. I have 2080ti. Hopefully change to 5090 next time.
Right? Ppl only focus on the fps
Don't trust everything you see on the internet, just like this video. the rtx 4060 ti is getting a bit less fps because this youtuber messed with the bios settings and in-game settings. If he didn't mess with them, then the rtx 4060 ti would perform a little bit better. But even if you still have an rtx 2080 ti and thinking about upgrading, then you should probably upgrade to the 4070 super or 4070 ti.
yes 2080 ti is a monster but, over an average of 100 less watts with 4060 ti.
Performance is great at those power consumption levels. Still a new PSU would only be about 100-200 if it wasn't. Not worth the upgrade from a 2080Ti most owners already have a 750W + PSU anyways.. only worth upgrading to a 4080Ti for at least + 50% performance.
I still can't believe this was a masterpiece from 5 years ago!💥
Im excited for AMD 8000 APUs, they're going to eliminate mid-tier gaming cards. With expectations of GPU pricing rising once again with AI demands, APU will be more critical than ever.
What do you mean with APUs? You don't mean the g CPUs right? Because CPUs like the Ryzen 5 5600g aren't even close to an actual graphics card so I guess you mean other APUs?
@@JanM2 amd will bring extremly fast apus that rival a 4070 max q for example with Ryzen 8000. that is what he means
Just seen it, seems interesting, but I'm not sure if that's just rumors and could end up being wrong. Also, even if it ends up being 100% true, there'd still be the issue that they would eat up their own GPU sales which can't be in their own interest. So I'd suppose they wouldn't exactly price those cheaply then
i feel like the 2080ti is worth waiting for the 7080ti
And with frame generation?
lol use fsr 3 on 2080 ti
@@pravnavlol fsr it's SHT
@@Nahtotter do you even realise that fsr frame gen is the same quality as dlss or are you too blinded by your own ignorance to realise that
@@pravnavbro, it's you blind if you didn't see difference between DLSS + FG and FSR + FG.
DLSS works better than FSR it's fact
@@Nahtotter did you read what i said or do you not realise fsr upscaling and fsr frame gen are two different things? I said, fsr frame gen is as good as dlss frame gen
Conclusion: Never "upgrade" from xx80 Ti to zz60 Ti series, because it's not an apple-to-apple upgrade...it's downgrade even. 😂 Should be from xx80 Ti to zz80 Ti. That's what we called REAL upgrade!
i9 13900K cpu power 30w ?
You can easily overclock a 2080 ti to 2100mhz so thats another 10-15% more perfomance
I think 700 w power supply is more then enough for rtx 2080ti with i3 12100 which is equal or better then i5 10400.
2080ti is faster FASTER! 🏆🍻And have more vram is even FASTER 🥇🍻 than 3070 8gb. Epic win defeat both cards 🍻
it was a 1200 dollar card so yea
@@ImperialDiecast now is 400 used
I got my 2080ti "broken" From a warehouse guy that was gonna throw it away. Rebuilt the card, still screams today.
Its great to see 4060ti getting performance of a 2080ti for $380. Just got a friend to pick up one of these cards and i'm excited to test it with them =)
It shows generational improvements are happening and the prices are falling.
no , what it shows that they've been sitting on their *ss for the last 6 years ,
relying on AI to do the work For Them , which gets you performance FROM 6 years ago ... today ...
relying on Frame Generation and DLSS to give us fake frames ...
extra fps , without it ... the gpu just has the same fps ...
so what did they make ... , Really ... ?
I wonder if the 5060/5060 Ti will be on par with the 4080. As well as have at least 12GB of VRAM.
bruh man the 4080 has the double or more fps than the 4060 its just impossible
5070=4080
If the 5060 ti comes with 8gb of VRAM, I promise I'll personally sue them so you don't have to
@@JanM2 5060 Ti should have 16GB, and 4060 12Gb. They release a very bad generation, and after that another bad one, but better, and all people will say that NVIDIA is doing well, because they will re-release 4070 (which is actually a real 4060 Ti) called the 5060 with a price of $350. We have already seen this with RTX 30 generation, after the terrible RTX 20 (3060 12Gb = 2060 Super with 12Gb, useless 3070 8Gb and 3080 10Gb 🤡).
@@GLadiator.RTX 20 and RTX 30 aren't the same architecture so I don't think RTX 2060 super is 3060 12GB and yeah this generation is just bad they uptier most of their card
4070Ti should be 4070
4070 should be 4060Ti
4060Ti should be 4060
4060 should be 4050
Keep in mind that the newer card consumes *drastically* less power.
I think that's the only 4060 ti advantage over 2080 ti. Rest is just worse
@@Blaczek297yeah but it is not worth that much considering this is desktop graphics card so power supply is not big of issue you just need to buy power supply 100w more. It's not something like your gonna use them with laptop that's for sure.
If you pay the energy bill yourself its worth the upgrade with current prices 😃 It cost like 50 euro extra a month in power if you are hardcore gamer.
4060ti is trash for 500 euros.
id rather get the 6800xt or 7900xt
well yea the 6800xt rips the 4060 ti to shredds haha and the 7900xt is another price class.
@@theplayerofus319 not by much.
7900xt goes for 850 euros
While the 4080 goes for 1250 euros.
That's a 400 euros for the same raster performance.
Yes you have dlss but let's be honest,
if you get a card for 1300 euros and you use dlss well that's basically a waste of money.
AMD sucks
@@jonelbondyingnuezca742 sucks where?
Gaming?
Nvidia sucks because they use dlss and frame gen.... While AMD fights with raster.
I got myself the 7900xt for 850 euros.
My friend has the 4080 and he told me that the 7900xt is better for price because he paid 1250 euro and that's 400 euros more for almost no benefits.
The 6700xt pulse is now 350 euros while the 4060ti is 460 euros
The 6700xt kills the 4060ti while being 100 euros cheaper.
AMD sucks?
It seems Nvidia sucks 😂
I talk facts bro... Wake up ... Stop being a slave mind
@@nephilimslayer frame gen is the future, it also has a low wattage. If that is your mindset then do not use Tessellation because it is fake polygons.
the 4080ti is also one of the best GPU's for rendering still delivering almost the same computing performance as the 4080.
*2080ti
@@prashantmishra9985 yeah, sorry ahah
its actually 2080ti vs 4050ti
Yes. and sell for joke $399.
Would love to see 4060 TI 16GB vs 2080 TI 11 GB comparison.
I am curious to see if the 16GB VRAM version may help in VRAM heavy unoptimized games (e.g. TLOU and Hogwarts Legacy)
honestly yes but its way too expensive wwith 16
@capsloct4863 you drunk? The 4060ti 16gb costs 500. For that you can get a rx 6800 16gb that conplelty destroys the 4060ti and is also super power efficent. No reason to buy a 4060ti exept being clueless or a fanboy really
@capsloct4863 the rx 6800 destroys a 3070ti in raster. Bro a 4060ti is a 1080p card why even bither with raytracing in such a low resolutuin. And it draws 50 watts more big deal 😅 funny how you mention clock speed which tells nothing of Performance. You kinda exposed yourself there. Again peoole who buy a 4060ti are suckers for nvida, every tech reviewer says that. Imaging paying 500 for a 1080p card ahahahahha. But hey ypu be happy with that and i play 1440p with my rx 6800 undeevolted to 150 watts and 20% more fps but hey at least ypu have the nvida logo on ypur card 🌚
@capsloct4863 you must be smoking crack, first of all ray tracing on a 4060ti is pointless, even in 1080p , if you want good ray tracing in 1080p you need a 4070
The 4060ti cannot even beat a 6700xt in performance much less the rx 6800. Rx 6800 sells for 479$ and has 16gbvram the 4060ti 16gb sells for 500$ and has much less raster performance, the difference is night and day in performance
@capsloct4863 NVidia cards aren't worth it unless you have the money for a 4090. The new driver that AMD just released makes the 7900 XTX faster than the 4080 and the 7900 XTX is usually cheaper
Rtx 2080 ti slightly perform better then rtx 4060 ti but the difference between graphic power wattage is huge , rtx 4060 ti performs surprisingly better at this power comsuption
only 1.9ghz sometimes 1.8 on the 2080ti???
So, current generation entry level gaming card (399$) is at the same level than 2 generation old supercard (999$). What's not to like?
Well, the pricing of the more powerful models, that's what. 4070 ti has more power, but it's MSRP of 799$ is absolutely bonkers in comparison. Well, I'll be better off waiting for the 5060 ti to replace my 2080 super, then...
Nvidia really got a big head with the 3000’s it’s sad
4060 ti consumes 100w less, not bad at all
except price
It is bad when you factor in the price, the memory bus and the 4 year age difference. This card underperforms severely.
A card that can match an 80 class GPU from 2 generations ago while costing $400 is pretty bad.
Low power is because nVidia starts using TSMC 5nm chip. In the future, no more benefit of power saving !!!
Considering it's 2 gens old, having just 8gb instead of 11gb at 400€ is extremely bad. The 3060 offered the same performance as the 1080 ti + 12gb after all at just 330€ and even this product was kinda disappointing. So I guess that makes the 4060 ti one of the worst value products Nvidia has brought out so far.
This is exactly on par for what the results should be. I have an RTX 2080 t.i. and it performs about as good as a 3070 or 3070ti.
It's funny how people get on here and complain and don't know what they are talking about.
The RTX 2080 t.i. was 30-40% faster than the 1080ti depending on the game you were playing.
It is in no way a bad GPU.
40% is an exaggeration. 2080 Ti was 30% faster yes
40 series is a effective generation rather than normal performance leap
Look at that power consumption difference.
I DON'T TRUST ANYTHING ABOUT THIS CHANNEL, ABOVE IT NEVER DOES THE TESTS WITH THE BENCHMARKS THAT THE GAMES HAVE INTEGRATED
true
That's why we always say competition is important , no one should buy 4080 cuz u have 7900 xtx cheaper, have more performances and have more vram so its great!. and no one should buy 4070 ti cuz u have 7900 xt cheaper, have more performance and have more vram, lol. Cant wait for 7800 xt and 7700 xt, hope for amd to defeat 4070 and 4060 ti, to make nvidiot know their fault.
vram tards still exist? lol
Top tier card vs middle card? 3070 would the same
So, basically the 4060Ti has almost the same performance than 2080ti
My poor 2080ti is being forced to play cyberpunk in 4k with ray tracing and the real life mod. It hates me.
This isnt unexpected. It not a rule, but generally, a card matches one level lower per genration. All things being equal, a 2080 matches a 3070, both match a 4060. So far, nothing unexpected.
What IS unexpected is for a goddamned 4060 to cost as mich as a 2080! *And* for it to pull down as much power, usually the same level across generations also uses less power. i.e., a 2080 and 4060 would perform the same, but the 4k drawing 100w less, or whatever.
1080ti vs 3060ti : 3060ti wins most of the time
2080ti vs 4060ti : 2080ti wins most of the time
Conclusion, BUY AN AMD GPU
3000 series were a way larger step than usual. Amd is loosig on raytracing, they need to work on that. Then you'll be right. 60's cards were always the "student's cards" and it delivers it.
4060ti gives more smooth gameplay even when fps is the same, fps is only a overall performance, but details are not displayed throw fps itself.
I can't believe that?! Is that Gen 4?!😮😢😅😂
2080ti is a one in a hundred generation masterpiece 👌
It was garbage value and barely an improvement over the 1080ti. 30 series were that if it wasnt for mining
@@rx10it brought RT cores(and still has quite good RT performance) and DLSS, it aged like fine wine, unlike the 1080ti that struggles running dx12 games now on the hardware level
Evidently the textures seems inferior and lacking detail compared to 2080 ti.
Only power draw is impressive of 4060
POWERFUL？YES！Trade by nearly 100W more power consumption lol
You should include DLSS 3 vs DLSS 2 with ray tracing in these tests. Since at this point everyone knows how bad the rasterization performance of the 4060 and 4060 Ti is.
150 vs 250watt with a difference 5-6 fps is awesome
That sucks tho, but the main thing of series 40 is the DLSS 3.0 so yeah right now it can be easily beated but if you put the DLSS 3.0 on a serie 40 the 4060 TI outplay the 2080 ti
If i had one i would stil use the rtx 2080 ti for me is a beter gpu. But i must be good with my used rtx 2060 from evga it costed me 137€ boughted at the end of last year.
Is this test for real?
a second hand 2080 Ti is probably way cheaper than 4060 Ti.
260 dollars in my country 😢
Huh, turn frame generation on and see the results. The 4060 ti is awesome.
Well thats the idea behind it. I have the cheapest RTX 4060 Ti in my PC from Gainward, Ghost edition coupled with i5 12400f and 32 gb RAM and I have around 80-90 fps@1080p with full ultra and technology preview "Path Tracing". @telquin6974
and ratchet and clank?
It's broken crap,even 11 gb of vram is not enough, this game use above 13 gb of vram even at 1080 p,so broken ps 5 shit
@@rick39413 sadge
@@rick39413like the last of us😂
@@Hehhhhhhhavvvv after patches not so vram hungry loke ratcher and clank, way less Vram intensvie,but it's also have problems with CPU,ram and vram usage like many ps 5 ports like spider man, where vram usage is higher and higher when u playing for no reason and in spider man u must have fast CPU for avoiding bottleneck especially on 1080 p, Ratcher and clank looks like cartoon and use 13 gb of vram,because game coded with ass
@@rick39413 when the last of us launched I remember my 3080TI and Core i7 13700k was getting around 40 fps in 2k res bro 🗿
Games these days are terrible 💔
Un amigo ha comprado una 3080 y yo le he cambiado mi ventus 3060 12gb por su anterior evga 2080Ti black, con ella habrá jugado 10 horas como máximo, ( le sobra el dinero y compra por puro hobby)....
Ahora me importa una mierda el dlss3, 4, 5 o 25...solo activo 1440p, ajustes al máximo y a disfrutar 🤷.
hold on, so the power draw is twice as much on 2080ti?
Great, the 4060 Ti can match a 80 class card from 2 generations behind... and let's also not forget the RTX 20 series was also an underwhelming generation since the 2080 Ti was only 20% faster than the 1080 Ti. So in reality, the 4060 Ti is 20% faster than the GTX 1080 Ti.
2080 ti is 35% faster than 1080 ti at least now
that perf difference is close, more like about ~%25, he did a video on 1080ti vs 4060ti a little over a month ago, if you want to watch the name of it is:
"GTX 1080 Ti vs RTX 4060 Ti - Test in 10 Games"
@@HitMarkersAreFun ruclips.net/video/j2XhYHb2ctU/видео.html
@@thewakly Sorry, I used TechPowerUp as a reference but still, it's pathetic. The 4060 Ti should smash the 1080 Ti in fact it should be comparable to a 3080.
@@HitMarkersAreFun Still weak, 4060 Ti should trade blows with a 3080.
Affordable 2023 vs OverPrice 2019-2021
RTX 4060 TI VS RTX 2080 TI
Who cares about it being current gen the 4060ti is around the same or worse than the 2080ti just because it has the performance equivalent to an older card doesn't mean its older.... The ps5 pro isnt an older gen