3DMakerpro Seal 3D Scanner Review

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 19 янв 2025

Комментарии • 16

  • @nziniz25
    @nziniz25 10 месяцев назад +3

    Hi great video, I come from a CNC background and would love to see an accuracy test to see if the seal pro lives up to the 0.01 mm claim

    • @serialhobbyism_official
      @serialhobbyism_official  10 месяцев назад +1

      My background is in CNC, too. The 0.01mm claim is unrealistic. Maybe 0.01mm precision, but definitely not accuracy. For example, you could scan a perfectly flat inspection table and your model would show visible variation in the surface. I would not recommend this for anything where accuracy matters at all, unfortunately.

    • @nziniz25
      @nziniz25 10 месяцев назад

      Thanks for the reply 😊

  • @swfreeD
    @swfreeD 11 месяцев назад +2

    if you want to see a carbon copy, you would have to look at the 3dmakerpro Mole. its essentially the creality lizard hardware wise.

    • @serialhobbyism_official
      @serialhobbyism_official  11 месяцев назад

      Good to know! I wonder if one company is designing/manufacturing these and selling them to other companies? Or all they all just buying components from the same suppliers?

    • @swfreeD
      @swfreeD 11 месяцев назад

      @@serialhobbyism_official i guess its some sort of white label oem selling licenses so these companies can slap their name and design onto the products. creality cheaped out on the matching software it seems and blatantly stole core code elements from artec´s software in the beginning, and artec argued the used structured light method creality had in their scanner was lifted of their scanners as well, which ended in a juicy artec vs creality patent infringement lawsuit.

  • @shepalderson
    @shepalderson 11 месяцев назад +1

    Thanks for sharing your thoughts and experience here. I've been thinking about getting a 3D scanner sometime soon, but they all seem either not quite ready for prime time or they are wildly expensive.

    • @serialhobbyism_official
      @serialhobbyism_official  11 месяцев назад

      Yeah, I can't speak to the practicality of the higher-end models, but these mid-range consumer models can be pretty frustrating to use. As an example, I needed to recreate the back cover for a Kindle. I spend probably 10+ hours and 100+ scans trying to get a usable result before I gave up and just modeled it from scratch in CAD.

  • @networkg
    @networkg 11 месяцев назад +1

    Excellent review.

  • @erickjoers8490
    @erickjoers8490 7 месяцев назад +1

    Cual me recomendarias para escanear objetos pequeños, estoy entre el 3dmakerpro seal y el recopint mini 2 o alguna otra marca que recomiendes por favor

  • @tegmentoo
    @tegmentoo 8 месяцев назад +1

    honest and detailed thank you

  • @cnccarving
    @cnccarving 8 месяцев назад

    i just bought seal lite
    it was discounted to 359
    for me the color isnt important but, the blue light allegedly better
    for its price a real affordable solition
    later might add the lynx
    for larger objects and for human figures
    i was wishing for nextengine laserscanner, but today im glad i couldnt afford

  • @rapidnetrick
    @rapidnetrick 11 месяцев назад

    @serialhobbyism_official Wow, that's quite an old CPU for software! It doesn't meet the requirements of the hardware / software....
    You have a 3rd gen ( Intel i7-3700k ) , requirements i5 8th gen or better!!
    Minimum computer requirements: Intel Core i5 8th, 16GB RAM MX250 GPU with 2GB VRAM
    Recommended computer requirements: Intel Core i7 8th, 16GB RAMNVDIA 3060 GPU with 4GB VRAM

    • @serialhobbyism_official
      @serialhobbyism_official  11 месяцев назад

      That was a typo, my bad! It's a i7-13700k (not 3700k), which is 13th gen.